Abstract
Bacterial motility is driven by the rotation of flagellar filaments which supercoil. The supercoiling involves the switching of coiled-coil protofilaments between two different states. In archaea, the flagellar filaments responsible for motility are formed by proteins with distinct homology in their N-terminal portion to bacterial Type IV pilins. The bacterial pilins have a single N-terminal hydrophobic α-helix, not the coiled-coil found in flagellin. We have used cryo-EM to study the adhesion filaments from the archaeon Ignicoccus hospitalis. While I. hospitalis is non-motile, these filaments make transitions between rigid stretches and curved regions, and appear morphologically similar to true archaeal flagellar filaments. A resolution of ~ 7.5 Å allows us to unambiguously build a model for the packing of these N-terminal α-helices, and this packing is different from several bacterial Type IV pili whose structure has been analyzed by electron microscopy and modeling. Our results show that the mechanism responsible for the supercoiling of bacterial flagellar filaments cannot apply to archaeal filaments.
Introduction
Bacterial motility has been a fascinating topic for many reasons. One question has been how a homopolymer, assembled from the protein flagellin, can form helical filaments that supercoil1. For an ideal helical polymer every subunit must be in an equivalent environment, and this generates a straight filament. But straight filaments generate no thrust when rotating, and mutant flagellins2, 3 have been found that form such ideal straight filaments with a resulting non-motile phenotype. For a supercoiled filament, subunits on the inside of the supercoil are in a different environment than subunits on the outside, but this creates a problem since all subunits are chemically identical. The resolution of this problem1, 4–9 involved a model for the flagella filament being composed of protofilaments that could discretely switch between two different states, one slightly longer in length than the other. The longer protofilaments would be found on the outside of the supercoil, while the shorter protofilaments would be found on the inside10, and the number of protofilaments in each state would determine the supercoil waveform. Detailed experimental studies by both x-ray fiber diffraction and electron cryo-microscopy (cryo-EM) have provided beautiful confirmation of this idea11–14 with models for both states of the protofilament at near-atomic resolution.
The protofilaments, 11 in the case of Salmonella and a number of other bacteria, but only seven for Campylobacter 15, are formed by intrasubunit coiled-coils involving the N- and C-terminal portions of flagellin12, 16, 17. However, it has now become clear that archaeal flagellar filaments are formed not by homologs of bacterial flagellin, but rather by proteins with distinct homology in their N-terminal portion to bacterial Type IV pilins18–25. All Type IV pilins are characterized by a conserved single N-terminal α-helix formed almost entirely from hydrophobic residues26–28. These pilins all have a signal sequence at the N-terminus that becomes cleaved and is not present in the mature pilin, and have globular domains that are highly divergent, even among related species 29, 30. The argument for homology between the archaeal flagellins and the bacterial Type IV pilins is supported by the similarity of the unusual signal sequences that are present in the preproteins, and the homology of the signal peptidases in bacteria and archaea that cleave this signal sequence22, 31, 32. Bacterial Type IV pilins assemble into pili that are involved in many activities, including adhesion and motility30.
Since archaeal flagellar filaments supercoil, as do the bacterial ones, a fascinating question is whether the mechanism of supercoiling is similar between the two. Existing structural studies of archaeal flagellar filaments23–25 have lacked the resolution needed to see whether coiled-coils might exist in these polymers and whether there are constituent protofilaments. We have used cryo-EM to study the Iho670 adhesion filaments33 from the archaeon I. hospitalis. This organism is non-motile, so these flagellar-like filaments that extend from the cell appear to be mainly involved in adhesion. Like bacterial Type IV pilins, Iho670 contains a short signal peptide at the N-terminus that is cleaved and not found in the mature protein. Inspection of the processed Iho670 N-terminal sequence (Fig. 1) shows that residues 4–25 are all hydrophobic. A comparison of the N-terminal amino acids with several bacterial Type IV pilins and an archaeal flagellar filament protein (Fig. 1) shows the strong conservation of these hydrophobic residues. Consistent with the globular D2/D3 domains in bacterial flagellin34 and the globular domains in bacterial Type IV pili35 which are all hyper-variable, the remainder of the Iho670 sequence shows no sequence conservation with other proteins.
Figure 1.

A ClustalW alignment58 of the N-termini of four bacterial Type IV pilins (Pseudomonas aeruginosa PilA from strain PAK; Neisseria gonorrhoeae PilE; Klebsiella oxytoca PulG; Vibrio cholera TcpA) with two archaeal flagellar proteins (Halobacterium salinarum FlgB2; Thermoplasma acidophilum FlaB) and the Iho670 protein from Ignicoccus hospitalis. The color code represents hydrophobicity, with red being the most hydrophobic and blue being hydrophilic.
Results
The Iho670 filaments were initially examined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of negatively stained specimens both while attached to cells (Fig. 2a) and after being sheared off the cells (Fig. 2b). Intact cells (Fig. 2a) of I. hospitalis were grown directly on carbon-coated gold grids, and the fibers were previously identified as being composed of Iho67033, 36. Due to the high number of fibers present, it was often impossible to say which fiber belonged to which cell. Many filaments appeared to be quite rigid over distances of ~ 20 μm. On the other hand, regions were seen (Fig. 2a, black arrows) where the filaments had a sinusoidal curvature. The sinusoidal paths were not all identical in amplitude and period. These characteristic curves were frequently found when two fibers crossed each other, but could also be found in isolated fibers. In addition, regions were found where the fibers looped about themselves (Fig. 2a, white arrows), completely inconsistent with the rigid appearance of these fibers in other areas. Similar images were obtained looking at many grids. These fibers were never exposed to any isolation procedure and were actually grown on the EM grids to reduce the chance of preparative artifacts, so we think that these observations represent the native characteristics of these filaments.
Figure 2.

Images of negatively stained (a, b) and unstained frozen/hydrated (c) Iho670 filaments. In (a) cells were grown on carbon-coated EM grids to avoid any mechanical damage to the filaments due to shear, transfer to the grids, etc. The black arrows point to regions where the filaments adopt a characteristic curved shape, which is frequently seen when one filament crosses over another one. The white arrows point to regions of what appear to be anomalous flexibility, where these normally rigid filaments can form tight loops. In (b) the filaments were sheared off the cells and concentrated. The black arrows (b) point to regions where the filaments undergo a bend of ~ 180°. In (c) the boxes that have been placed around the filaments are 250 Å (200 px) in width. The scale bar in (a) is 2 μm.
When the filaments were sheared off the cells and examined by negative stain EM (Fig. 2b), they also appeared to behave anomalously. That is, they were inconsistent with the appearance of filaments having a uniform flexural rigidity whose curvature is driven by thermal forces37. Most of the filaments appeared quite rigid over long distances, but some (Fig. 2b, arrows) showed a characteristic curvature responsible for reversing the direction of the filament.
Cryo-EM
We used cryo-EM of unstained frozen/hydrated Iho670 for further image analysis (Fig. 2c). A total of 17 micrographs were used after eliminating those with any astigmatism, drift, or aggregation of the filaments. The defocus range was from 1.7 to 3.4 μm. A power spectrum (Fig. 3) calculated from the cryo-EM segments shows more than seven layer lines. Given that the one at ~ 1/(17.9 Å) could only be either n=+1 or n=−1, the indexing of this pattern was relatively unambiguous, particularly since the two strongest layer lines (labeled n=7, n=−3 in Fig. 3) were of odd Bessel order based upon phase relations in Fourier Transforms of EM images of negatively stained filaments. This contrasts with other helical specimens where substantial ambiguities may exist in the indexing of such patterns38, 39. The only ambiguity from this pattern is whether the layer line at 1/(17.9 Å) is n=+1 or n=−1. We show (below) that it is most likely to be n=+1, so we use that convention in the figure. The indexing scheme shown (Fig. 3) corresponds to ~ 3.4 subunits per turn of a 17.9 Å pitch helix.
Figure 3.

A power spectrum computed from 14,731 overlapping segments of the Iho670 filaments (each segment 500 Å long). The log of the power spectrum is shown to allow for the very large dynamic range. Because each image was first multiplied by the measured CTF to boost the overall signal-to-noise ratio in the images, the modulation of the pattern due to the CTF is readily apparent. The strongest layer lines are labeled with their Bessel orders, assuming that the layer line at 1/(17.9 Å) is n=+1, and not n=−1 (see text).
These estimates for the helical symmetry were used in the IHRSR procedure 40, starting with a solid cylinder as the initial reference. A total of 22,966 overlapping boxes (each 400 px long, 1.25 Å/px) were used, but the final reconstruction (Fig. 4) was generated from 17,476 segments, with the remainder discarded due to poor alignment statistics. The IHRSR procedure converged to a rotation of 106.65° per subunit and an axial rise of 5.3 Å. The reconstructed volume is ~ 140 Å in diameter, with large globular domains on the outside, and a center containing nearly vertical rod-like densities (Fig. 4c, arrow). These rod-like densities appear to be the N-terminal α-helices, and this arrangement is similar in broad terms to what has been proposed for Type IV pili26, 41 with two differences: the globular domains are significantly larger in the Iho670 filaments, and the resolution achieved here is unprecedented. The larger globular domains in Iho670 filaments are expected, as the total MW of Iho670 is 33 kDa, while a typical bacterial Type pilin is ~ 17 kDa.
Figure 4.
The surface of a reconstruction of the Iho670 fiber (a, b) and in cross-section (c). The cross-section (c) shows the nearly vertical rod-like densities (arrow) that are at the center of the volume. The reconstruction has been filtered to 7.5 Å. The space bar (c) is 50 Å.
To determine the resolution of this reconstruction, we first used the Fourier Shell Correlation (FSC) approach. While this method is widely used, it has also been noted that it can be quite misleading42, 43. The main problem is that the two volumes being compared are rarely independent, since the most common approach (that used in Fig. 5) involves aligning both sets of images to a common three-dimensional reference. Thus, noise can become correlated as well as any true signal. Using the more conservative FSC=0.5 criterion44 the resolution suggested (Fig. 5) is a phenomenal 3.75 Å. To obtain a better estimate of resolution, one must use truly separate sets of filament images for the two reconstructions being compared, as opposed to extensively overlapped segments45. We have used a molecular modeling approach to derive a more meaningful estimate of the resolution.
Figure 5.
The Fourier Shell Correlation is shown between two volumes, each containing half of the 17,476 segments used in the total reconstruction (Fig. 4). Since the sampling is 1.25 Å /px, the “conservative” measure of FSC=0.5 yields a resolution of 1/(3.75 Å) which we can show to be absurd using molecular modeling.
Modeling the N-terminus
Secondary structure prediction46 shows a strong helix propensity for the N-terminal residues (Fig. 1), so we think it is quite reasonable to assume those residues to be a helix. Given the enantiomorphic ambiguity present in the reconstruction, whether the 1/(17.9 Å) layer line is n=+1 (right-handed) or n=−1 (left-handed), and given the two possible polarities of the helix, four cases were considered: 1) right-handed density, N-terminus at the center of the core; 2) right-handed density, C-terminus of the α-helix at the center of the core; 3) left-handed density, N-terminus at the center of the core; 4) left-handed density, C-terminus of the α-helix at the center of the core. The helix was modeled as a perfect α-helix with all side-chain atoms present. For the side-chain rotamers we chose the most probable rotamer in Coot47, which uses the the Richardson rotamer library48. This helical model was then kept rigid with tight restraints during the refinement. For each case 10 different starting positions of the α-helix were generated, which differed only in the rotation around the long axis of the helix; the 10 starting models covered rotation angles between 0–360°. This resulted in 40 individual refinements which were performed using the program DireX49. The α-helix was kept almost rigid using strong restraints during the refinement. A cross-validation approach (details will be published elsewhere) was used to evaluate the fitting, from which we get a Cwork and a Cfree value (Fig. 6). The Cwork value is the cross-correlation of the model density with the experimental density map using the spatial frequency range of 9–200Å which was used to perform the fitting. The Cfree value is obtained with maps bandpass filtered between the frequencies of 6–9 Å, a range that has not been used in the fitting. Fig. 6 shows the Cfree/Cwork values for the last 30 steps of all 40 fittings.
Figure 6.
The correlation coefficient between the model and the density map bandpass filtered between 9 and 200 Å is plotted as Cwork, while the correlation coefficient between the model and the density map filtered between 6 and 9 Å is plotted as Cfree. Four different classes of models were used, two having a right-handed one-start helix and two having a left-handed helix, and two having the N-terminus at the inside of the core and two having the N-terminus at the outside of the core.
The best models are those with the highest Cfree (Fig. 6, red ellipse). These results suggest that the one-start helix is indeed right-handed, as labeled in Fig. 3, and that the N-terminus is located at the very core, with the C-terminal end of this helix leading into the globular domain, as expected. The five best models were virtually identical, and the best is shown (Fig. 7). In addition to the modeling arriving at the correct helix directionality (with the N-terminal end at the core), the axial position of the helix appears to have been found correctly as well, despite the fact that the first two N-terminal amino acids (Val-Ser) are not predicted to form an α-helix and were not used in the fitting described. When these two amino acids are added afterwards, they are contained within the density envelope (Fig. 7), while an incorrect fit of the α-helix to the density map would have shifted the helices down to fill this unoccupied density. This finding provides further support for our model. A comparison between the model and the reconstruction by computing the FSC between a density map derived from the model and the reconstructed density, suggests that the actual resolution, at least in the core of the volume, is ~ 7.5 Å. This shows that the even/odd FSC estimate (Fig. 5) in this instance is hugely over-optimistic, and suggests that reality checks are frequently needed to properly assess resolution.
Figure 7.
A model for the packing of the first 26 N-terminal residues in the Iho670 filaments (magenta ribbons) shown with the electron density present within the central core of the filament (transparent yellow surface). The density has been filtered to 7.5 Å. The density and model within a radius of 20 Å from the helical axis are shown in both (a) and (b), but in (b) the front half has been cut away.
Discussion
Our results show unambiguously that the core of the Iho670 filaments contain single α-helices, and that the details of the packing of these helices is very different from what has previously been described for the Neisseria gonorrhoeae PilE26 and the Klebsiella oxytoca PulG41 pili. In the case of PilE, the helical parameters were a rotation of 100.8° and an axial rise of 10.5 Å, while for PulG the parameters were a rotation of 84.7° and an axial rise of 10.4 Å, in contrast to the 106.65° and 5.3 Å that we find for Iho670. These observations support the notion that although all N-terminal hydrophobic helices in these Type IV pilin-like proteins may have a common origin, a large divergence in the quaternary structure of the filaments formed by these proteins has occurred. Similar arguments have been made for bacterial flagellins15 and bacterial actin-like proteins50–54. In contrast to the case of bacterial flagellins, where the strong conservation of the regions responsible for filament assembly led to the reasonable expectation that the packing of all flagellins would be conserved34, the substitution of one hydrophobic residue for another in the archaeal homologs of Type IV pilin might lead to less of an expectation for a conserved packing. The loss of a charged residue, Glu5 in bacterial pilins, which is expected to be a key determinant in the packing of Type IV pilins30, may have also allowed for the large change in quaternary organization of these α-helices. On the other hand, the different symmetry in the Iho670 filament may still mean that a conserved assembly mechanism is shared with the bacterial Type IV pilins.
How similar are the Iho670 filaments to archaeal flagellar filaments? Only two archaeal flagellar filaments have been studied in any structural detail, from Halobacterium salinarum24, 25 and from Sulfolobus shibatae 23. In the case of H. salinarum it was shown that both the twist and axial rise were variable24, but that the mean symmetry was a 108.0° rotation and a 5.4 Å rise. For S. shibatae the situation was even more complicated, as the filaments could exist either in a purely helical state or as stacks of rings23. For the helical state, the symmetry was 108.0° and a rise of 5.3 Å. These symmetries are quite similar to what we observe for the Iho670 filaments (106.65°, 5.3 Å), consistent with our argument that these adhesion fibers are actually similar to the two other archaeal flagellar filaments described so far. The reconstructions of both the H. salinarum and the S. shibatae filaments were from negatively stained samples, and the resolution was probably limited to 15 Å or worse. At this resolution, it would be very difficult or impossible to resolve single α-helices, so the possibility that coiled-coils or protofilaments might exist (both as in the bacterial flagellar filaments) could not be excluded. For the Iho670 filaments we show that the core can only be composed of single α-helices, and that these can only be making interactions with the helices from 3 or 4 neighboring subunits. This contrasts with the Salmonella flagellar filament, where very strong interactions are made (forming protofilaments) between the coiled-coil formed by the N- and C-terminus of subunit n and that from n+11. Thus, the mechanism for supercoiling that has been so beautifully established for bacterial flagellar filaments10–14 is unlikely to apply to the archaeal flagellar filaments, and these filaments appear to have developed a different mechanism for the supercoiling of helical homopolymers through convergent evolution.
The transitions that we observe between rigid and straight Iho670 filament segments and those with a characteristic curvature (Fig. 2) raise questions about where this switching occurs. The flexural rigidity of a filament will, in general, scale with the fourth power of the radial mass distribution, so almost all of the rigidity will be due to the highest radius contacts between protomers in these 140 Å diameter filaments. An equivalent statement is that the α-helices packed in the core of these filaments (within a radius of 20 Å) will contribute very little to the flexural rigidity. So contacts among the globular outer domains at the highest radii will most likely be involved in the switching that is observed. Understanding how these adhesion filaments can make such transitions, and how archaeal flagellar filaments supercoil, will be the aim of future research.
Materials and Methods
Preparation of the I. hospitalis filaments
Growth of cells and preparation of their filaments was as described earlier33. In short, this procedure included: growth of cells in a 300-liter fermenter in the medium described earlier55 followed by harvesting the cells via overnight flow-through centrifugation. From the supernatant of this centrifugation, filaments were precipitated overnight at 4° C (by PEG6000 / NaCl addition at 10.5 and 5.8% final concentration, respectively) and harvested by centrifugation (30 min at 10,000 x g). Aliquots representing 10 liter of original fermentation were dissolved in 8 ml buffer; thereafter 3.6 g CsCl were added. After CsCl gradient centrifugation (48 hrs at 250,000 x g) the resulting band was collected by a 20 gauge needle and filaments were dialyzed against 5 mM MES buffer (pH 6.0) containing 1 mM MgSO4 × 7 H2O + 1 mM dithiothreitol and stored at 4° C.
Electron microscopic imaging and analysis
Samples were routinely analyzed by application to glow-discharged, carbon-coated Cu grids, negative staining using uranyl acetate (2% wt/v), and imaging in a FEI CM12 TEM at an accelerating voltage of 120 keV, equipped with a TVIPS 0124 CCD camera (1k × 1k pixel). For cryo-TEM, fibre samples (3 μl) were applied to freshly glow-discharged C-flat grids, blotted, and plunged into liquid ethane using a home-built cryo-plunger. Grids were imaged using a Tecnai F20 microscope (FEI) at an accelerating voltage of 200 keV and a nominal magnification of 50,000x, and recorded on film. Micrographs were scanned with a Nikon Coolscan 8000 at a raster of 1.25 Å per pixel. The helixboxer routine in EMAN56 was used for cutting filaments from micrographs. The SPIDER software package57 was used for most of the subsequent processing. A negative B-factor of 300 Å 2 was applied to the final volume to compensate for the envelope function of the microscope and other effects that reduce the power in the reconstruction at the highest resolution.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by NIH EB001567 (to E.H.E.) and by WI 731/10-1 from the DFG to (R.W. and R.R.).
Reference List
- 1.Asakura S. Polymerization of flagellin and polymorphism of flagella. Adv Biophys. 1970;1:99–155. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Trachtenberg S, DeRosier DJ. A molecular switch: subunit rotations involved in the right-handed to left-handed transitions of Salmonella typhimurium flagellar filaments. J Mol Biol. 1991;220:67–77. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90381-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hyman HC, Trachtenberg S. Point mutations that lock Salmonella typhimurium flagellar filaments in the straight right-handed and left-handed forms and their relation to filament superhelicity. J Mol Biol. 1991;220:79–88. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90382-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kamiya R, Asakura S, Yamaguchi S. Formation of helical filaments by copolymerization of two types of ‘straight’ flagellins. Nature. 1980;286:628–630. doi: 10.1038/286628a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kamiya R, Asakura S. Flagellar transformations at alkaline pH. J Mol Biol. 1976;108:513–518. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(76)80133-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kamiya R, Asakura S. Helical transformations of Salmonella flagella in vitro. J Mol Biol. 1976;106:167–186. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(76)90306-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Asakura S, Eguchi G, Iino T. Salmonella flagella: in vitro reconstruction and over-all shapes of flagellar filaments. J Mol Biol. 1966;16:302–316. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(66)80174-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Calladine CR. Change of waveform in bacterial flagella: the role of mechanics at the molecular level. J Mol Biol. 1978;118:457–479. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Calladine CR. Construction of bacterial flagella. Nature. 1975;255:121–124. doi: 10.1038/255121a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hasegawa K, Yamashita I, Namba K. Quasi- and nonequivalence in the structure of bacterial flagellar filament. Biophys J. 1998;74:569–575. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77815-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Maki-Yonekura S, Yonekura K, Namba K. Conformational change of flagellin for polymorphic supercoiling of the flagellar filament. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17:417–422. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yonekura K, Maki-Yonekura S, Namba K. Complete atomic model of the bacterial flagellar filament by electron cryomicroscopy. Nature. 2003;424:643–650. doi: 10.1038/nature01830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Samatey FA, Imada K, Nagashima S, Vonderviszt F, Kumasaka T, Yamamoto M, Namba K. Structure of the bacterial flagellar protofilament and implications for a switch for supercoiling. Nature. 2001;410:331–337. doi: 10.1038/35066504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yamashita I, Hasegawa K, Suzuki H, Vonderviszt F, Mimori-Kiyosue Y, Namba K. Structure and switching of bacterial flagellar filaments studied by X-ray fiber diffraction. Nat Struct Biol. 1998;5:125–132. doi: 10.1038/nsb0298-125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Galkin VE, Yu X, Bielnicki J, Heuser J, Ewing CP, Guerry P, Egelman EH. Divergence of quaternary structures among bacterial flagellar filaments. Science. 2008;320:382–385. doi: 10.1126/science.1155307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mimori-Kiyosue Y, Vonderviszt F, Yamashita I, Fujiyoshi Y, Namba K. Direct interaction of flagellin termini essential for polymorphic ability of flagellar filament. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:15108–15113. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.26.15108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Vonderviszt F, Aizawa S, Namba K. Role of the disordered terminal regions of flagellin in filament formation and stability. J Mol Biol. 1991;221:1461–1474. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90946-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Thomas NA, Jarrell KF. Characterization of flagellum gene families of methanogenic archaea and localization of novel flagellum accessory proteins. J Bacteriol. 2001;183:7154–7164. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.24.7154-7164.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Thomas NA, Bardy SL, Jarrell KF. The archaeal flagellum: a different kind of prokaryotic motility structure. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2001;25:147–174. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2001.tb00575.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Thomas NA, Pawson CT, Jarrell KF. Insertional inactivation of the flaH gene in the archaeon Methanococcus voltae results in non-flagellated cells. Mol Genet Genomics. 2001;265:596–603. doi: 10.1007/s004380100451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bayley DP, Jarrell KF. Further evidence to suggest that archaeal flagella are related to bacterial type IV pili. J Mol Evol. 1998;46:370–373. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Szabo Z, Stahl AO, Albers SV, Kissinger JC, Driessen AJ, Pohlschroder M. Identification of diverse archaeal proteins with class III signal peptides cleaved by distinct archaeal prepilin peptidases. J Bacteriol. 2007;189:772–778. doi: 10.1128/JB.01547-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cohen-Krausz S, Trachtenberg S. The flagellar filament structure of the extreme acidothermophile Sulfolobus shibatae B12 suggests that archaeabacterial flagella have a unique and common symmetry and design. J Mol Biol. 2008;375:1113–1124. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.10.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Trachtenberg S, Galkin VE, Egelman EH. Refining the structure of the Halobacterium salinarum flagellar filament using the iterative helical real space reconstruction method: insights into polymorphism. J Mol Biol. 2005;346:665–676. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cohen-Krausz S, Trachtenberg S. The structure of the archeabacterial flagellar filament of the extreme halophile Halobacterium salinarum R1M1 and its relation to eubacterial flagellar filaments and type IV pili. J Mol Biol. 2002;321:383–395. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00616-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Craig L, Volkmann N, Arvai AS, Pique ME, Yeager M, Egelman EH, Tainer JA. Type IV pilus structure by cryo-electron microscopy and crystallography: implications for pilus assembly and functions. Mol Cell. 2006;23:651–662. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Forest KT, Tainer JA. Type-4 pilus-structure: outside to inside and top to bottom--a minireview. Gene. 1997;192:165–169. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(97)00008-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Parge HE, Forest KT, Hickey MJ, Christensen DA, Getzoff ED, Tainer JA. Structure of the fibre-forming protein pilin at 2.6 A resolution. Nature. 1995;378:32–38. doi: 10.1038/378032a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pelicic V. Type IV pili: e pluribus unum? Mol Microbiol. 2008;68:827–837. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06197.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Craig L, Pique ME, Tainer JA. Type IV pilus structure and bacterial pathogenicity. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2:363–378. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Albers SV, Szabo Z, Driessen AJ. Archaeal homolog of bacterial type IV prepilin signal peptidases with broad substrate specificity. J Bacteriol. 2003;185:3918–3925. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.13.3918-3925.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Pohlschroder M, Ghosh A, Tripepi M, Albers SV. Archaeal type IV pilus-like structures--evolutionarily conserved prokaryotic surface organelles. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2011;14:357–363. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2011.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Müller DW, Meyer C, Gürster S, Küper U, Huber H, Rachel R, Wanner G, Wirth R, Bellack A. The Iho670 fibers of Ignicoccus hospitalis: a new type of archaeal cell surface appendage. J Bacteriol. 2009;191:6465–6468. doi: 10.1128/JB.00858-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Beatson SA, Minamino T, Pallen MJ. Variation in bacterial flagellins: from sequence to structure. Trends Microbiol. 2006;14:151–155. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2006.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hansen JK, Forest KT. Type IV pilin structures: insights on shared architecture, fiber assembly, receptor binding and type II secretion. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006;11:192–207. doi: 10.1159/000094054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Müller DW. Die Fibers von Ignicoccus hospitalis: Ultrastruktur, Verankerung und molekularbiologische Untersuchungen. University of Regensburg; Regensburg, Germany: 2010. Ref Type: Thesis/Dissertation. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Rivetti C, Guthold M, Bustamante C. Scanning force microscopy of DNA deposited onto mica: equilibration versus kinetic trapping studied by statistical polymer chain analysis. J Mol Biol. 1996;264:919–932. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Yu X, Egelman EH. Helical filaments of human Dmc1 protein on single-stranded DNA: a cautionary tale. J Mol Biol. 2010;401:544–551. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.06.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Egelman EH. Reconstruction of helical filaments and tubes. Methods Enzymol. 2010;482:167–183. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(10)82006-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Egelman EH. A robust algorithm for the reconstruction of helical filaments using single-particle methods. Ultramicroscopy. 2000;85:225–234. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3991(00)00062-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Campos M, Nilges M, Cisneros DA, Francetic O. Detailed structural and assembly model of the type II secretion pilus from sparse data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:13081–13086. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1001703107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Yang S, Yu X, Galkin VE, Egelman EH. Issues of resolution and polymorphism in single-particle reconstruction. J Struct Biol. 2003;144:162–171. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2003.09.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Grigorieff N. Resolution measurement in structures derived from single particles. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2000;56 (Pt 10):1270–1277. doi: 10.1107/s0907444900009549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Rosenthal PB, Henderson R. Optimal Determination of Particle Orientation, Absolute Hand, and Contrast Loss in Single-particle Electron Cryomicroscopy. J Mol Biol. 2003;333:721–745. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Galkin VE, Orlova A, Salmazo A, Djinovic-Carugo K, Egelman EH. Opening of tandem calponin homology domains regulates their affinity for F-actin. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17:614–616. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Jones DT. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J Mol Biol. 1999;292:195–202. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Emsley P, Cowtan K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2004;60:2126–2132. doi: 10.1107/S0907444904019158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lovell SC, Word JM, Richardson JS, Richardson DC. The penultimate rotamer library. Proteins. 2000;40:389–408. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Schröder GF, Brunger AT, Levitt M. Combining efficient conformational sampling with a deformable elastic network model facilitates structure refinement at low resolution. Structure. 2007;15:1630–1641. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2007.09.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Galkin VE, Orlova A, Rivera C, Mullins RD, Egelman EH. Structural polymorphism of the ParM filament and dynamic instability. Structure. 2009;17:1253–1264. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2009.07.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Polka JK, Kollman JM, Agard DA, Mullins RD. The structure and assembly dynamics of plasmid actin AlfA imply a novel mechanism of DNA segregation. J Bacteriol. 2009;191:6219–6230. doi: 10.1128/JB.00676-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Orlova A, Garner EC, Galkin VE, Heuser J, Mullins RD, Egelman EH. The Structure of Bacterial ParM Filaments. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2007;14:921–926. doi: 10.1038/nsmb1300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Popp D, Narita A, Ghoshdastider U, Maeda K, Maeda Y, Oda T, Fujisawa T, Onishi H, Ito K, Robinson RC. Polymeric structures and dynamic properties of the bacterial actin AlfA. J Mol Biol. 2010;397:1031–1041. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Popp D, Xu W, Narita A, Brzoska AJ, Skurray RA, Firth N, Ghoshdastider U, Maeda Y, Robinson RC, Schumacher MA. Structure and filament dynamics of the pSK41 actin-like ParM protein: implications for plasmid DNA segregation. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:10130–10140. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.071613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Paper W, Jahn U, Hohn MJ, Kronner M, Nather DJ, Burghardt T, Rachel R, Stetter KO, Huber H. Ignicoccus hospitalis sp nov., the host of ‘Nanoarchaeum equitans’. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57:803–808. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64721-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Ludtke SJ, Baldwin PR, Chiu W. EMAN: semiautomated software for high-resolution single-particle reconstructions. J Struct Biol. 1999;128:82–97. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.1999.4174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Frank J, Radermacher M, Penczek P, Zhu J, Li Y, Ladjadj M, Leith A. SPIDER and WEB: Processing and visualization of images in 3D electron microscopy and related fields. J Struct Biol. 1996;116:190–199. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.1996.0030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:4673–4680. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




