Skip to main content
Iranian Biomedical Journal logoLink to Iranian Biomedical Journal
. 2013 Jan;17(1):1–7. doi: 10.6091/ibj.22.2012

Cloning, Expression and Characterization of Recombinant Exotoxin A-Flagellin Fusion Protein as a New Vaccine Candidate against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections

Asghar Tanom 1, Safar Farajnia 2,*, Shahin Najar Peerayeh 1, Jafar Majidi 3
PMCID: PMC3600974  PMID: 23279828

Abstract

Background: Infections due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa are among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in patients who suffer from impaired immune responses and chronic diseases such as cystic fibrosis. At present, aggressive antibiotic therapy is the only choice for management of P. aeruginosa infections, but emergence of highly resistant strains necessitated the development of novel alternative therapeutics including an effective vaccine. Several P. aeruginosa antigens have been tested for vaccine development, including lipopolysaccharide alone, polysaccharides alginate, extracellular proteins, exotoxin A (exo A) and killed whole cell. However, none of them are currently available clinically. Methods: In this research, recombinant exoA-flagellin (fliC) fusion protein as a cocktail antigen was expressed and purified and its antigenic characteristics were evaluated. Results: Expression of recombinant fusion protein by E. coli using pET22b vector resulted in production of exoA-fliC fusion protein in high concentration. Based on Western-blotting results, recombinant fusion protein showed a good antigenic interaction with sera from patients with various P. aeruginosa infections. Conclusion: These results suggested that recombinant exoA-fliC fusion protein can be produced in the laboratory, and tested as a candidate vaccine in P. aeruginosa infections.

Key Words: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Exotoxin A (exoA), Flagellin (fliC), Vaccines

Introduction

pseudomonas aeruginosa is a Gram-negative opportunistic pathogen that commonly infects patients with impaired immune response. P. aeruginosa is associated with severe infections in patients with burns, cystic fibrosis and subjects receiving immunosuppressive drugs. The bacterium is frequently isolated from wounds, sputum, blood and other clinical samples from nosocomial infections. P. aeruginosa septicemia has a high mortality especially in burn patients [1].

P. aeruginosa has several virulence factors that play important roles in the pathogenesis of the bacterium. Surface factors, such as pilli, flagellum and polysaccharide layer of lipopolysaccharide are involved in attachment and colonization of the bacterium. Proteins secreted by this bacterium also have an important role in the distribution and tissue damage [1, 2]. This bacterium has different chromosomal and plasmid-mediated resistance genes involved in the resistance of the bacterium to anti-microbial agents. Even newly developed antibiotics have failed to reduce the mortality rate associated with this organism. Low permeability of outer membrane and different efflux pumps are also among common mechanisms of drug resistance in P. aeruginosa [3]. Hence, due to high prevalence of antimicrobial resistance, the immunoprophylaxis and immunotherapy might be an effective method for treatment and control of P. aeruginosa infections. It has been shown that neutralization of bacterial virulence factors can result in prevention and reduction of mortalities due to P. aeruginosa infections [4].

For this purpose, different antigenic and virulence factors, such as outer membrane proteins, toxins, flagella, pilli and high molecular weight poly-saccharides have been evaluated as vaccine candidates [5-8]. P. aeruginosa exotoxin A (exoA) plays an important role in virulence of the bacterium and it has been shown that the exoA-deficient mutants exhibit virulence 20 times less than the wild type strain in the mouse models [9].

The mechanism of exoA activity in mammalian cells has been studied in detail [9-11]. The toxin binds and enters into the cells by receptor-mediated endocytosis and then translocates to the cell cytoplasm, where it inactivates elongation factor 2 and inhibits protein synthesis. Also, exoA has ability to inhibit the host response to infection [9]. ExoA is an antigenic protein that induces humoral immune responses in animal models. Based on the results of different studies, these antibodies are highly protective. Therefore, exoA has been considered as a promising vaccine candidate for pseudomonas infections [10-12].

The bacterial flagellum binds to epithelial cells via asialo-GM1 receptors and induces inflammatory responses through activation of kappa B nuclear factor by interaction with the toll-like receptor-5 and -2 [13]. The bacterial flagella are strong immunogenic factors and active or passive immunization with flagellar antigens induces antibody production. These antibodies inhibit bacterial distribution, thus prevent systemic infection in a mouse model of burn and pulmonary infections [13]. Studies have shown that monoclonal antibodies against P. aeruginosa flagellin (fliC) are very protective against P. aeruginosa infections in various animal models. Therefore, this antigen has been also suggested as a vaccine candidate for P. aeruginosa [14-16].

It has been demonstrated that immunization with a single antigen cannot induce protective immune response in an optimal level, whereas vaccines containing cocktail of different antigens are capable of generating higher level of immune responses. Different cocktails or fusion proteins have been attempted against pseudomonas infections, such as exoA-pillin [10], exoA-oprF-oprI [12], fliCa,b-oprF-oprI [7], but there is no any report on preparation of exoA-fliC-combined vaccine for pseudomonas infection.

In the present study, we describe the preparation of recombinant exoA and fliC protein as a new vaccine candidate against pseudomonas infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and plasmids. P. aeruginosa strains PAO1 and 8821M were used for DNA extraction and amplification of exoA and fliC genes, respectively. E. coli strains DH5α and BL21 (Novagen, USA), plasmids pTZ57R (Fermentas, Lithuania) and pET22b (Novagen, USA) were used in cloning and recombinant expression.

Primer design. Primers for exoA gene (domains I-II, the binding and translocator domains) were designed based on exoA gene sequence of P. aeruginosa PAO1. Primers for fliC were designed to amplify N-terminal 170 amino acids from fliC gene sequence of P. aeruginosa 8821M. Therefore, 1212 bp N-terminal nucleotides of exoA gene and 510 bp N-terminal nucleotides of fliC gene were selected for primer design (Table 1).

Table 1.

Primer sequences were used in amplification of exotoxin A (exoA) and flagellin (fliC) gene fragments.

ExoA gene Forward GGATCCCCGAGGAAGCCTTCGAC Bam HI
Reverse GTGTTGACGGTCAAGGCCATGCCGTCGCCGAGGAACTC
FliC gene Forward GAGTTCCTCGGCGACGGCATGGCCTTGACCGTCAACACCAAC
Reverse GTTCAGCGACTCTGCGCTCATCTCCTCGAG Xho I

DNA extraction and PCR amplification of fliC and exoA genes. Genomic DNA was extracted with phenol-chloroform method as described elsewhere [17]. ExoA and fliC genes were amplified separately by PCR in 25-μl volumes. The amplification conditions for exoA were initial denaturation at 94°C (4 min) and 31 cycles consisting of 94°C (1 min), 65°C (1 min), 72°C (1 min) and a final extension at 72°C (5 min). The program for fliC were 94°C (4 min), 31 cycles consisting of 94°C (1 min), 58°C (1 min), 72°C (1 min) and an additional extension time at 72°C (5 min). PCR products related to fliC and exoA were gel purified separately by a purification kit (Macherey Nagel, Germany) and analyzed by electrophoresis.

Preparation and amplification of exoA-fliC fusion gene by overlapping PCR method. Overlapping PCR was used for construction of exoA-fliC fusion gene [18]. Briefly, 5 μl of exoA and fliC PCR products was annealed and used as template in a PCR reaction containing exoA forward and fliC reverse primers. The gene amplification conditions were 95°C (4 min), 30 cycles consisting of 94°C (1 min), 60°C (60 s), 72°C (1.5 min) and an additional extension time at 72°C (10 min). The PCR product was electrophoresed on 1% agarose gel and analyzed by gel document. The PCR band related to fusion gene was cut and recovered by using a purification kit (MN, Macherey Nagel, Germany).

Cloning and sequencing. Cloning of fusion gene was carried out by ligation of PCR product into the pTZ57R vector using TA cloning method according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Fermentas, Lithuania). The ligation was transformed into the E. coli DH5a, and screening was performed by PCR and restriction analysis. Positive clones of pTZ-exoA-fliC were sequenced (Eurofins MWG Operon, Germany) for analysis of the sequence integrity.

S ubcloning and f usion protein expression . For recombinant expression of exoA-fliC fusion protein in E. coli, the insert was removed from pTZ-exoA-fliC vector by digestion with XhoI enzymes and subcloned into the pET22b expression vector. Then, the pET22b-exoA-fliC construct was transformed into E. coli BL21, cultured in LB broth containing ampicillin and incubated at 37°C and 15 rpm/min shaking. In an optical density equal to 0.5 (600 nm), the culture was induced by adding 1 mM IPTG and it was continued for further four hours. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 6,000 ×g for 3 minutes and the protein expression was assessed using SDS-PAGE.

Preparation of cellular lysate and analysis of solubility of expressed protein. For expressed protein solubility analysis, E. coli BL21 containing pET22b-exoA-fliC vector was cultured in 10-ml LB broth supplemented with ampicillin. After 18 hours, it was transferred to 100-ml LB broth containing ampicillin and incubated at 37°C and 250 rpm shaking. In optical density eua = 0.5 (600 nm) 1 mM IPTG was added to the culture and the incubation was continued for two hours in 37°C and 250 rpm shaking. Then, bacterial

pellet was collected by centrifugation at 7000 ×g for 10 min, dissolved in 3 ml of lysis buffer and sonicated on ice (20 s, 80%, 10 periods). After cell lysis, it was centrifuged at 8000 ×g for 10 min and the supernatant and pellet were analyzed by SDS-PAGE for determining the solubility of expressed protein.

Protein purification from inclusion body. Ni-NTA affinity chromatography method (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA, USA) was used for His-tagged fusion protein purification according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Purification was performed under denaturing condition using 8 M urea for denaturation. The sonication pellet (inclusion body) was washed 3× with PBS + 1% Triton X-100 and dissolved in 4-6 ml of 8 M urea lysis buffer. The supernatant was then mixed with 2 ml resin, incubated at room temperature for 30 min and transferred to chromatography column. The contamination proteins were washed away from the column using wash buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate, 300 mM NaCl, 50 mM imidazol, pH 8.0). The protein was then collected from column by using elution buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate, 300 mM NaCl and 250 mM imidazol, pH 8.0). For removing imidazol, the purified recombinant protein was dialyzed against PBS, pH 7.4. The purity of protein was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and protein concentration was assessed by Bradford's method.

Western-blotting. Western-blotting was used to evaluate the immunological properties of recombinant exoA-fliC fusion protein. For this purpose, the recombinant protein was separated on SDS-PAGE gel and transferred to PVDF membranes by semi-dry blotting. Then, the reactivity of recombinant protein with antibody to P. aeruginosa native exoA (Sigma Product Number P2318) and sera (1:2000) from patients with P. aeruginosa infections were analyzed. The blood samples of patients with systemic and local P. aeruginosa infections were obtained from Sina Hospital (Tabriz). The P. aeruginosa infections in these patients were nosocomial and multi-resistant drug infections. HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (1:5000), HRP-conjugated anti-human IgG (1:5000) and DAB substrate were used for reaction detection.

Results

PCR amplification of P. aeruginosa exoA and fliC genes. PCR amplification of exoA (domains I and II) gene from P. aeruginosa strain PAO1 and fliC gene from P. aeruginosa strain 8821M resulted in a PCR products of 1212 bp and 510 bp, respectively, that was in expected product sizes (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Electrophoresis of PCR product on agarose gel (1%). Lane 1, exoA, lane 2, fliC and lane 3, DNA size marker (1 kb).

Preparation of exoA-fliC fusion gene by overlapping PCR. PCR amplification of exoA-fliC fusion gene using exoA forward and fliC reverse primers resulted in a fragment of 1722 bp (Fig. 2). Sequencing fusion gene after cloning into pTZ57 vector confirmed the integrity and in-frame fusion of exoA-fliC genes.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Electrophoresis of overlapping PCR product on agarose gel (1%). Lane 1, exotoxinA-fliC and Lane 2, DNA size marker (1 kb).

Recombinant expression of exoA-flagellin fusion protein. For high-level expression of exoA-fliC fusion protein in E. coli, the insert was removed from pTZ-57 cloning vector and subcloned into the pET22b expression vector along with c-terminal 6-His tag (Fig. 3). Induction of E. coli BL21 with IPTG transformed with expression cassette resulted in a high level expression of recombinant protein as appeared in SDS-PAGE analysis of the lysate of induced bacteria. Figure 4 shows the Coomassie blue stained SDS-PAGE gels of E. coli culture before and after induction. Recombinant exoA-fliC fusion protein was expressed as a 63-kDa protein in high concentration. Purification of His-tagged fusion protein by Ni-NTA affinity chromatography resulted in a highly pure protein which was appeared as a single band in SDS-PAGE analysis of purified protein (Fig. 4).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Electrophoresis of digestion product. Lane 1 and 2, recombinant vector pET22b-exo-fliC digested whit BamhI and XhoI; Lane 3, DNA size marker (1 kb).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Analysis of expressed and purified recombinant fusion protein on SDS-PAGE (12%). Lane 1, standard protein size marker; lane 2, pellet of un-induced bacteria; lane 3, pellet of IPTG-induced bacteria and lane 4, purified-recombinant fusion protein.

Western-blotting results. Western-blotting analysis showed that recombinant exoA-fliC was reacted with antibody against native exoA antibody (Fig. 5). This finding verified the correct conformational structure of recombinant protein produced in E. coli. Analysis for reactivity of recombinant fusion protein to sera from patients with P. aeruginosa infections showed that all sera contained antibody against exoA-fliC and they were highly reacted to the recombinant protein (Fig. 6).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Western-blot of recombinant fusion protein probed with polyclonal anti-exotoxin antibody (Sigma, UK). Lane 1, pre-stained protein size marker and lane 2, purified fusion protein.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Western-blot of recombinant fusion protein probed with the sera from patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Lane1, pre-stained protein size marker and Lanes 2-6, reaction of purified recombinant fusion protein with the sera from patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection.

Discussion

P. aeruginosa is the second-leading cause of nosocomial infections that is frequently resistant to most of commonly used antibiotics [19]. Therefore, the management of P. aeruginosa infections is a major problem in clinical practice. Nowadays, development of alternative methods for treatment of P. aeruginosa infections is very necessary [20]. Various new approaches have been investigated to combat pseudo-monas infection. Among them, immunotherapy and vaccine development seem to be promising therapeutic and preventive tools [4]. Several different antigens have been evaluated for their immunogenicity and protective response in mouse models [21, 22], but it has shown that none of these tested antigens alone were able to induce sufficient protective response. Therefore, it has been postulated that effective immune response induction may need the use of a cocktail of different antigens [9, 21, 22].

Enhanced clearance of P. aeruginosa following immunization of mice with different cocktail antigens, including LPS-exoA [23], exoA-oprF-oprI [12], exoA-alginate [24], fliCa,b-oprF-oprI [7] and exoA-Elastase-alkaline protease [25] have been reported by different investigators. These studies proposed exoA and fliC of P. aeruginosa as important vaccine candidates [13, 26].

We report here the development of a recombinant exoA-fliC fusion protein as a new vaccine candidate against P. aeruginosa infections. A study has used native exoA and fliC purified from bacterial culture; however, it has shown that purification of native exoA from culture medium is very difficult and proteases secreted into the culture medium decrease the yield of product [27]. Therefore, production of recombinant exoA is preferred for preparation of exoA with high quality and quantity.

On the other hand, the native exoA is toxic and its modification into toxoid form by different methods may alter its conformation, which this can affect immunological properties of the protein. However, in the recombinant approach, it is possible to genetically manipulate the structure of exoA and select desired domains and epitopes. For example, it has been shown that deletion of Glu-553 in the toxic domain of exoA abolishes the toxicity of pseudomonas exoA [28]. In our study, non-toxic exoA with suitable immunogenic properties was obtained by deletion of enzymatic domain.

In the case of fliC, it has been shown that efficiency of purification of native fliC from bacteria is low and production of fliC by recombinant technology is a preferred method [29]. In the recombinant method, not only production of large amounts of fliC is possible but also selection of conserved and immunogenic domains and deleting of unnecessary domains are feasible. In our study, a 510-bp fragment of fliC gene (encoding 170 conserved N-terminal amino acids of fliC) and a 1212-bp fragment of exoA gene (encoding 404 N-terminal amino acids of exoA as non-toxic domain) were selected and used for recombinant expression and protein production.

In this research, exoA-fliC fusion gene was prepared by overlapping PCR method and showed that this method is rapid, easy and cost-effective for preparation of fusion protein. This finding is consistent with the previous reports about advantages of overlapping PCR for production of fusion genes [18, 30].

Expression of recombinant fusion protein by E. coli using pET22b vector resulted in production of exoA- fliC fusion protein in high concentration, that it is appeared as an approximately 63-kDa band in SDS-PAGE. Western-blot analysis showed the reactivity of exoA-fliC fusion protein with antibody against native exoA, that confirms the correct structure of recombinant fusion protein. This finding indicated that this system is a suitable expression system for production of recombinant exoA-fliC fusion protein, that is consistent with several previous studies [17, 27-29].

Sera from patients infected with P. aeruginosa recognized the recombinant fusion protein in 1:2000 dilution. This finding verified the highly antigenic properties of the selected proteins. These results showed that exoA and fliC of P. aeruginosa are immunogenic during infection and all patients’ sera reacted with recombinant protein. These results also indicate that this fusion protein may be used as a serodiagnostic antigen for rapid diagnosis of P. aeruginosa infections.

In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that the exoA-fliC fusion protein prepared in this study is a highly antigenic molecule that can be considered as a new vaccine candidate for further evaluations in animal models.

Acknowledgment

We thanks Dr. Ashraf Mobarez (Dept. of Bacteriology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University), Hamid Mostafazadeh, Leila Rahbarnia and Shiva Ahdi Khosroshahi (Biotechnology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences) for their kindly helps and suggestions.

References

  • 1.Mesaros N, Nordmann P, Plesiat P, Roussel-Devallez M, Van EldereJ, Glupczynski Y, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: resistance and therapeutic options at the turn of the new millennium. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007 Jun;13(6):560–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01681.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sadikot R, Blackwell TS, Christman JW, Prince AS. Pathogen-host interactions in Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 Jun;171(11):1209–23. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200408-1044SO. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tavajjohi Z, Moniri R. Detection of ESBLs and MDR in Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a tertiary-care teaching hospital. Iranian J Clin Infect Dis. 2011;6(1):18–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Doring G, Pierb GB. Vaccines and immunotherapy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Vaccine. 2008 Feb;26(8):1011–24. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Manafi A, Kohanteb J, Mehrabani D, Japoni A, Amini M, Naghmachi M, et al. Active immunization using exotoxin A confers protection against Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in a mouse burn model. BMC Microbiol. 2009;(23):223–7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-9-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cryz SJ, Fiirer E, Sadoff JC, Germanier R, Pastan I, Willingham MC, et al. Use of pseudomonas aeruginosa toxin A in the construction of conjugate vaccines and immunotoxins. Rev Infect Dis. 1987 Sep-Oct;(5):S644–S9. doi: 10.1093/clinids/9.supplement_5.s644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Weimer ET, Haiping Lu, Kock N, Wozniak D, Mizel S. A fusion protein vaccine containing OprF Epitope 8, OprI, and type A and B flagellins promotes enhanced clearance of nonmucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect Immun. 2009 Jun;77(6):2356–66. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00054-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Doring G, Meisne C, Stern M. A double-blind randomized placebo-controlled phase III study of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa flagella vaccine in cystic fibrosis patients. PNAS. 2007 Jun;104(26):11020–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702403104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wolf P, Beile U. Pseudomonas exotoxin A: From virulence factor to anti-cancer agent. Int J Med Microbiol. 2009 Mar;299(3):161–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2008.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hertle R, Mrsny R, Fitzgerald D. Dual-Function Vaccine for Pseudomonas aeruginosa: characterization of chimeric exotoxin A-pilin protein. Infect Immun. 2001 Nov;69(11):6962–9. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.11.6962-6969.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Denis-Mize KS, Price BM. Analysis of immunization with DNA encoding Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2000 Feb;27(2):147–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2000.tb01425.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chen TY, Shang HF. Recombinant protein composed of pseudomonas exotoxin A outer membrane proteins I and F as vaccine against P aeruginosa infection. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1999 Oct;52(4):524–33. doi: 10.1007/s002530051555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Campodo´nico V, Llosa N, Grout M, Do¨ring G, Maira-Litra´n T, Pier G. Evaluation of flagella and flagellin of Pseudomonas aeruginosa as vaccines. Infect Immun. 2010;78(2):746–55. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00806-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Matsumoto T, Tateda K, Miyazaki S, Furuya N, Ohno A, Ishii Y, et al. Effect of antiflagellar human monoclonal antibody on gut-derived Pseudomonas aeruginosa sepsis in mice. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1999 Jul;6(4):537–41. doi: 10.1128/cdli.6.4.537-541.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Barnea Y, Carmeli Y, Neville L, Kahel-Reifer H, Eren R, Dagan S, et al. Therapy with anti-flagellin A monoclonal antibody limits Pseudomonas aeruginosa invasiveness in a mouse burn wound sepsis model. Burns. 2009 May;35(3):390–96. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2008.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nilsson E, Amini A, Wretlind B, Larsson A. Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections are prevented in cystic fibrosis patients by avian antibodies binding Pseudomonas aeruginosa flagellin. J Chromatogr. 2007;856(1-2):75–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2007.05.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Farajnia S, Hassanpour R, Lotfipour F. Cloning and expression of human IL-11 in E. coli. Pharm Sci. 2010;15(4):353–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Heckman K, Pease L. Gene splicing and mutagenesis by PCR-driven overlap extension. Nat Protoc. 2007;2(4):924–32. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tohidpour A, Najar PeerayehS, Mehrabadi JF, Rezaei YazdiH. Determination of the efflux pump-mediated resistance prevalence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, using an efflux pump inhibitor. Curr Microbiolol. 2009 Sep;59(3):352–5. doi: 10.1007/s00284-009-9444-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Stanislavsky ES, Lam JS. Pseudomonas aeruginosa antigens as potential vaccines. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1997 Nov;21(3):243–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1997.tb00353.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Weimer ET, Ervin SE, Wozniak DJ, Mizel SB. Immunization of young African green monkeys with OprF epitope 8–OprI–type A- and B-flagellin fusion proteins promotes the production of protective anti-bodies against non-mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Vaccine. 2009 Nov;27(48):6762–9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.08.080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kamei A, Coutinho-Sledge YS, Goldberg JB, Priebe GP, Pier GB. Mucosal vaccination with a multivalent, live-attenuated vaccine induces multifactorial immunity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa acute lung infection. Infect Immun. 2011 Mar;79(3):1289–99. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01139-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lang AB, Horn MP, Imboden MA, Zuercher AW. Prophylaxis and therapy of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in cystic fibrosis and immunocompromised patients. Vaccine. 2004 Dec;22(Suppl 1):S44–S8. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Johansen HK, Espersen F, Cryz SJJr, Hougen HP, Fomsgaard A, Rygaard J. Immunization with Pseudomonas aeruginosa vaccines and adjuvant can modulate the type of inflammatory response subsequent to infection. Infect Immun. 1994 Aug;62(8):3146–55. doi: 10.1128/iai.62.8.3146-3155.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Matsumoto T, Tateda K, Furuya , N , MiyazakiS , Ohno A, Ishii Y, et al. Efficacies of alkaline protease, elastase and exotoxin A toxoid vaccines against gut-derived Pseudomonas aeruginosa sepsis in mice. J Med Microbiol. 1998 Apr;47:303–8. doi: 10.1099/00222615-47-4-303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fogle MR, Griswold JA, Oliver JW, Hamood AN. Anti-ETA IgG neutralizes the effects of Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A. J Surg Res. 2002 Jul;106(1):86–98. doi: 10.1006/jsre.2002.6433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Douglas CM, Guidi-Rontani C, Collier RJ. Exotoxin A of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: active, cloned toxin is secreted into the periplasmic space of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1987;169(11):4962–4966. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.11.4962-4966.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chen TY, Lin CP, Loa CC, Chen TL, Shang HF, Hwang J, et al. A nontoxic Pseudomonas exotoxin A induces active immunity and passive protective antibody against pseudomonas exotoxin A intoxication. J Biomed Sci. 1999 Sep-Oct;6(5):357–63. doi: 10.1007/BF02253525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Goudarzi G, Sattari M, Habibi RoudkenarM, Montajabi-Niyat M, Zavaran-Hosseini A, Mosavi-Hosseini K. Cloning, expression, purification, and characterization of recombinant flagellin isolated from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biotechnol Lett. 2009 Sep;31(9):1353–60. doi: 10.1007/s10529-009-0026-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bryksin AV, Matsumur I. Overlap extension PCR cloning: a simple and reliable way to create recombinant plasmids. BioTechniques. 2010 Jun;48(6):463–5. doi: 10.2144/000113418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Biomedical Journal are provided here courtesy of Pasteur Institute of Iran

RESOURCES