Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: European J Org Chem. 2012 Oct 22;2012(33):6508–6512. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.201201101

Combined Pd/C and Montmorillonite Catalysis for One-Pot Synthesis of Benzimidazoles

Nicholas A Weires [a], Jared Boster [a], Jakob Magolan [a],*
PMCID: PMC3601921  NIHMSID: NIHMS430900  PMID: 23525858

Abstract

A series of nineteen benzimidazoles are prepared from ortho-nitroanilines via one-pot transfer hydrogenation, condensation, and dehydrogenation enabled by the concurrent use of two heterogeneous catalysts: montmorillonite-K10 and Pd/C. This strategy is further employed to accomplish a five-step, three-component synthesis of an antifungal benzimidazoquinazoline using a simple one-pot procedure.

Keywords: heterogeneous catalysis, heterocycles, synthetic methods, clays, benzimidazoles

Introduction

The use of multiple catalysts in one-pot reactions to achieve sequential transformations, termed ‘tandem concurrent catalysis’, is documented predominantly for homogeneous systems.[1] Extension of this strategy to heterogeneous catalysts offers noteworthy advantages. In such cases, the inherent economic and environmental benefits of one-pot multistep sequences are paired with facile catalyst removal by filtration and opportunities for convenient catalyst recycling.[2] Indeed, the development of multi-functional heterogeneous catalysts is enabling multistep transformations with remarkable efficiency.[3] While incorporation of complex catalytic materials, such as polyfunctional mesoporous silicas,[3d, 3i] into routine use in synthetic research laboratories is limited by catalyst availability, the pragmatic chemist can now choose from an abundance of simpler heterogeneous options.[4] In principle, any two or more chemically compatible heterogeneous materials are potential tandem catalysts for one-pot multistep transformations. Herein we aim to draw attention to this underutilized strategy by demonstrating a facile preparation of benzimidazoles from ortho-nitroanilines and aldehydes enabled by the simultaneous use of two heterogeneous catalysts, palladium on carbon and the acid-treated clay montmorillonite-K10.[5] Not only is the isolation of two intermediates avoided but products of high purity are recovered by simple filtration.

Benzimidazoles demonstrate wide ranging biological activities including efficacy against cancers,[6] HIV,[7] and HSV-1.[8] Benzimidazole are most commonly prepared from ortho-arylenediamines which, in turn, are available via ortho-nitration of anilines and subsequent reduction of the nitro moiety.[9] The two principal synthetic strategies for benzimidazole formation are: a) condensation of ortho-arylenediamines with carboxylic acids and derivatives thereof,[10] and b) dehydrogenation of benzimidazoline intermediates generated from condensation of ortho-arylenediamines with aldehydes.[11] The first of these methods entails acidic conditions and high temperatures while the second typically requires stoichiometric or excess oxidants. Catalytic aerobic methods have recently emerged as suitable green alternatives for benzimidazoline oxidation.[12] Transition metal catalyzed aryl amination,[13] C-H functionalization,[14] and oxidation of alcohols,[15] have also been employed in the efficient preparation of benzimidazoles.

Results and Discussion

We envisioned a three-step sequence starting from ortho-nitroaniline (1) where Pd/C would catalyze both the initial hydrogenation of the nitro moiety and the terminal benzimidazoline dehydrogenation, while montmorillonite-K10 would catalyze condensation of diamine (2) with an aldehyde (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Proposed one-pot synthesis of benzimidazoles.

The reduction of the aryl nitro moiety via transfer hydrogenation over Pd/C is a well-documented process.[16] The compatibility of montmorillonite-K10 and Pd/C has also been previously established.[17] Thus, as anticipated, the reduction of ortho-nitroaniline in the presence of montmorillonite-K10 was readily accomplished in refluxing toluene with ammonium formate (>3 equiv.) as the hydrogen donor. Cyclohexene and ammonium acetate were also found to be suitable hydrogen donors but ammonium formate was preferred due to comparative ease of handling. We were pleased to observe that inclusion of benzaldehyde in this reaction mixture resulted in formation of the desired 2-phenyl benzimidazole 5 albeit in modest yield (65%) and contaminated by a small amount of the 1,2-disubstituted benzimidazole 6 (Table 1, Entry 1). A considerable amount of unreacted phenylenediamine was also recovered indicating that some of the benzaldehyde had likely undergone reduction.

Table 1.

Initial attempted one-pot benzimidazole synthesis.graphic file with name nihms-430900-t0004.jpg

Entry Conditions Yield[a] (5+6) Ratio (5:6)
1 PhCHO (1.0 equiv. added at
start of reaction)
65 % 50 : 1
2 Reflux 1 hour, then PhCHO (1.0
equiv.), then reflux 16 hours
71 % 8 : 1
2 Reflux 1 hour, then PhCHO (2.0
equiv.), then reflux 16 hours
85 % 1 : 1
[a]

Yield after chromatography (5 + 6 were co-eluted).

When benzaldehyde addition was withheld until complete reduction of the nitro moiety (1 h), a modest improvement in yield was observed along with a drop in selectivity for 5 over 6 (Table 1, Entry 2).

Formation of the undesired 1,2-disubstituted benzimidazole, 6, was a predictable complication. Under a variety of conditions, ortho-arylenediamines are documented to react with two aldehyde equivalents to yield 1,2-disubstituted benzimidazoles.[18] This presumably proceeds via isomerization of intermediate 9 to benzimidazole 6 (Scheme 2). This aromatization has been previously proposed to proceed via 1,3-hydride shift.[18c, 18d] However, given that suprafacial 1,3-hydride shifts are symmetry forbidden and the antarafacial pathway would be geometrically disfavoured, it is conceivable that an intermolecular hydride transfer may be occurring. Addition of two molar equivalents of benzaldehyde to our reaction did not yield exclusively 6 but rather a 1 : 1 mixture of 5 and 6 (Table 1, Entry 3).

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Rationale for formation of benzimidazole 6.

Given the equilibrium between compounds 7 and 9 under acidic conditions, exclusive formation of the monosubstituted benzimidazole (5) requires that dehydrogenation of benzimidazoline (7 to 5) is favored over isomerization of 9 to 6 (Scheme 2). While a number of oxidants are known to mediate selective formation for 5 over 6 in such systems,[11,12] dehydrogenation using Pd/C is not previously reported.

A brief screen of conditions for the reaction of phenylenediamine with benzaldehyde in the presence of both catalysts, revealed that selectivity between 5 and 6 was remarkably temperature-dependent (Table 2). Above 60 °C, a substantial amount of 6 was produced while at or below room temperature the desired benzimidazole 5 was formed exclusively. In fact, when the reaction was performed in an ice bath (4 °C – rt) only trace formation of 6 was observed even in the presence of two equivalents of benzaldehyde (Table 2, Entry 6).

Table 2.

Optimization of selectivity of benzimidazole 5 over 6.graphic file with name nihms-430900-t0005.jpg

Entry Conditions Ratio of 5 : 6 [a]
1 120 °C, 1 h 4 : 1
2 60 °C, 16 h 4 : 1
3 45 °C, 16 h 20 : 1
4 22 °C, 16 h >100 : 1
5 4 °C - rt, 16 h >100 : 1
6 4 °C - rt, 16 h, 2 equiv. of PhCHO 100 : 1
[a]

Determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy of crude reaction mixture.

With the issue of selectivity resolved, a suitable set of conditions was established for the one-pot three-step reaction. The substrate is first treated with NH4HCO2 (3.3 equiv.), Pd/C (0.05 equiv. Pd), and montmorillonite-K10 (300 mg/mmol of substrate) in refluxing toluene for 1 hour to complete the reduction of the nitro moiety. Next the reaction is cooled and an aldehyde (1 equiv.) is added before stirring for a further 16 hours while allowing the reaction to warm from 4 °C to ambient temperature. Notably, we found that both Pd/C and montmorillonite-K10 are needed for high yielding benzimidazole synthesis but a some product formation (< 20%) was also observed in the absence of montmorillonite. Using the optimized procedure we prepared 19 benzimidazoles (5, 10-27 Table 3). as a mixture of tautomers that equilibrate at elevated temperatures (see supporting information). [d] 2-nitrophenol was used as the substrate.

Table 3.

One-pot synthesis of benzimidazoles.graphic file with name nihms-430900-t0006.jpg

graphic file with name nihms-430900-t0007.jpg graphic file with name nihms-430900-t0008.jpg graphic file with name nihms-430900-t0009.jpg
graphic file with name nihms-430900-t0010.jpg graphic file with name nihms-430900-t0011.jpg graphic file with name nihms-430900-t0012.jpg
graphic file with name nihms-430900-t0013.jpg graphic file with name nihms-430900-t0014.jpg graphic file with name nihms-430900-t0015.jpg
graphic file with name nihms-430900-t0016.jpg graphic file with name nihms-430900-t0017.jpg graphic file with name nihms-430900-t0018.jpg
graphic file with name nihms-430900-t0019.jpg graphic file with name nihms-430900-t0020.jpg graphic file with name nihms-430900-t0021.jpg
graphic file with name nihms-430900-t0022.jpg graphic file with name nihms-430900-t0023.jpg graphic file with name nihms-430900-t0024.jpg
graphic file with name nihms-430900-t0025.jpg graphic file with name nihms-430900-t0026.jpg

[a] Reaction conditions: substrate (1.0 mmol), NH4CHO2 (3.3 equiv.), Mont-K10 (300 mg), Pd/C (0.05 equiv. Pd), reflux, 1 h; then aldehyde (1 equiv.), 4 °C - rt, 16 h [b] Isolated yield after chromatography. [c] Isolated as a mixture of tautomers that equilibrate at elevated temperatures (see supporting information). [d] 2-nitrophenol was used as the substrate.

The procedure was found to be suitable for a variety of electron-rich and -poor substituted benzaldehydes (10-19). These included three ortho-substituted benzaldehydes (16, 18, 19) as well meta-hydroxy benzaldehyde (12). Several aliphatic aldehydes were also found to be suitable substrates for the reaction (20-24) and alkyl substitution on the 1,2-nitroaniline substrate was tolerated (13, 24, 26). Three heteroaromatic aldehydes were also suitable substrates (25-27). When 2-nitrophenol and benzaldehyde were used as substrates, 2-phenyl benzoxazole (28) was obtained in low yield.

To further highlight the synthetic value of this general strategy we set out to synthesize a substituted dihydrobenzo[4,5]imidazo[1,2-c]quinazoline, 34, using a one-pot, three-component, five-step sequence (Scheme 3). 34 has previously been shown to have narrow-spectrum anti-fungal activity against E. Flocossum.[19] We envisioned a one-pot sequence whereby 4,5-dimethyl-2-nitroaniline (29) is initially reacted with ortho-nitrobenzaldehyde (30) to yield to benzimidazole 31 which is not isolated but rather subjected to a second nitro-reduction and condensation with para-anisaldehyde (32, Scheme 3).

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

One-pot, five step synthesis of anti-fungal agent 34.

Gratifyingly, the one-pot five-step procedure proceeded as planned giving the desired heterocyclic product (34) in 60% overall yield. We found that the last stage of the reaction sequence, condensation of anisaldehyde (33), required a mild elevation of temperature (40 °C) to proceed at a reasonable rate. We were cautious to avoid excessive heating at this stage due to the potential of further dehydrogenation of 34 or condensation between 34 and a second equivalent of anisaldehyde (33) followed by isomerization to the fully aromatic species (analogous to formation of 6, Scheme 2). Although 1H NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixture containing 33 suggested a trace amount of dehydrogenation of this product, we were unable to isolate any substantial byproducts of the reaction. From a procedural standpoint, this one-pot five-step synthesis of 33 was exceptionally facile requiring no workup apart from a single filtration followed by chromatographic purification of the product.

Conclusions

Synthetic innovation today increasingly stresses the themes of efficiency, procedural simplicity and minimal environmental impact. In this context multiple reactions conducted in one-pot, employing easily removable and reuseable heterogeneous catalysts, and non-polluting redox procedures constitute desirable tools with the potential to improve access to valuable compounds. We have combined these themes to prepare benzimidazoles from ortho-nitroanilines by means of a one-pot transfer hydrogenation, condensation, and dehydrogenation sequence made possible by the concurrent use of montmorillonite-K10 and Pd/C. In this manner, nineteen benzimidazoles were prepared in good yields. The process was further extended to a one-pot, five-step, three-component synthesis of a bioactive tetracyclic benzimidazoquinazoline, 34. With this methodology we hope to highlight the largely untapped potential of tandem concurrent heterogeneous catalysis to facilitate multi-step organic synthesis.

Experimental Section

General procedure for the one-pot three-step synthesis of benzimidazoles 5, 10-27: To 25 mL round bottom flask charged with a magnetic stir bar are added: the nitroaniline (1.00 mmol), ammonium formate (3.30 mmol), Montmorillonite-K10 (300 mg) and 5% Pd/C (106 mg, 0.05 mmol Pd). Solids remaining on the sides of the flask are then rinsed to the bottom with toluene (10 mL) to give a bright yellow solution interspersed with black heterogeneous particles. This reaction mixture is refluxed vigorously at 120°C for 1 hr. Effervescence of CO2 is evidenced by a frothing of the reaction that is distinguishable from reflux. This settles after about 30 minutes. The resulting solution is colorless, interspersed with black heterogeneous particles. The reaction mixture is allowed to cool and 1.00 mmol of the desired aldehyde is added by micropipette (liquid) or funneled weighing paper (solid). The reaction mixture is stirred in an ice bath and allowed to warm to ambient temperature overnight (16 hrs). The reaction mixture is filtered through a pad of Celite and rinsed with methanol under mild air pressure. The solvent of the filtrate is then removed in vacuo to give the corresponding benzimidazole in typically high purity. All benzimidazoles were further purified by liquid chromatography using 1% methanol/99% dichloromethane as the eluent.

One-pot, five step procedure for the synthesis of 6-(4-methoxyphenyl)-9,10-dimethyl-5,6-dihydrobenzo[4,5]imidazo[1,2-c]quinazoline (34): To 25 mL round bottom flask equipped with a magnetic stir bar are added: 166. 9 m g o f 4 , 5-dimethyl-2-nitroaniline (1.00 mmol), 208.7 mg of ammonium formate (3.31 mmol), 300 mg of Montmorillonite-K10 and 108.7 mg of 5% Pd/C (0.05 mmol Pd). Solids remaining on the sides of the flask are then rinsed to the bottom with 10 mL toluene. This mixture is refluxed vigorously at 120°C for 1 hr. Effervescence of CO2 is observed. This reaction mixture is cooled to room and 151.5 mg 2-nitrobenzaldehyde (1.00 mmol) is added by funneled weighing paper. The resulting yellow reaction mixture is stirred in an ice bath and allowed to warm to room temperature overnight (16 hrs). To this mixture (containing 31) is added 208.6 mg of ammonium formate (3.31 mmol) by funneled weighing paper, after which the reaction is again refluxed vigorously at 120°C for 1 hr to yield a colorless solution interspersed with black heterogeneous particles. To this is added 138.8 mg p-anisaldehyde (1.02 mmol) by micropipette, yielding a yellow mixture. This reaction is heated at 40°C in an oil bath for an 16 hrs to yield a colorless solution of the crude benzimidazoquinazoline (34) interspersed with black heterogeneous particles. The reaction mixture is filtered through a pad of Celite pad and rinsed with methanol. The solvent is removed in vacuo and the product is purified by chromatography (1% methanol / 99% dichloromethane as eluent). Yield 215.3 mg (60%, mp 111-114 °C); yellow solid; Rf 0.70 (5%MeOH-95%DCM); 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.90 (dd, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, 1.5 Hz), 7.45-7.39 (m, 2H), 7.23-7.18 (m, 1H), 7.17-7.11 (m, 2H), 6.94-6.90 (m, 2H), 6.89-6.85 (m, 2H), 6.84-6.77 (m, 2H), 3.69 (s, 3H), 2.27 (s, 3H), 2.21 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 159.5, 146.1, 142.8, 142.4, 132.7, 131.3, 131.1, 130.5, 130.4, 127.1, 124.3, 118.7, 118.0, 114.7, 114.0, 112.3, 110.6, 67.3, 55.1, 20.1, 19.8. These data are in agreement with reported literature values.[19]

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

Acknowledgments

This work was made possible by the University of Idaho and by the INBRE program, NIH Grant Nos. P20 RR016454 (National Center for Research Resources) and P20 GM103408 (National Institute of General Medical Science). N.A.W. received generous support from the Brian and Gayle Hill Undergraduate Research Fellowship. We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Dr. Alex Blumenfeld with NMR analysis.

Footnotes

Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW under http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.xxxxxxxxx.

Supporting Information (see footnote on the first page of this article): General information, characterization data and copies of 1H and 13C NMR spectra for compounds 5, 10-28, and 34.

References

  • [1].a) Wasilke J-C, Obrey SJ, Baker RT, Bazan GC. Chem. Rev. 2005;105:1001–1020. doi: 10.1021/cr020018n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Fogg DE, dos SEN. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2004;248:2365–2379. [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Felpin F-X, Fouquet E. ChemSusChem. 2008;1:718–724. doi: 10.1002/cssc.200800110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].a) Climent MJ, Corma A, Iborra S. Chem. Rev. 2011;111:1072–1133. doi: 10.1021/cr1002084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Shylesh S, Thiel WR. ChemCatChem. 2011;3:278–287. [Google Scholar]; c) Fraile JM, Garcia N, Herrerias CI, Mayoral JA. Catal. Today. 2011;173:15–20. [Google Scholar]; d) Shylesh S, Wagener A, Seifert A, Ernst S, Thiel WR. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010;49:184–187. doi: 10.1002/anie.200903985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Motokura K, Tada M, Iwasawa Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:7944–7945. doi: 10.1021/ja9012003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Akagawa K, Sakamoto S, Kudo K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007;48:985–987. [Google Scholar]; g) Motokura K, Fujita N, Mori K, Mizugaki T, Ebitani K, Kaneda K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:9674–9675. doi: 10.1021/ja052386p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h) Pilling AW, Boehmer J, Dixon DJ. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007;46:5428–5430. doi: 10.1002/anie.200701079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; i) Zeidan RK, Hwang S-J, Davis ME. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006;45:6332–6335. doi: 10.1002/anie.200602243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].a) Ley SV, Baxendale IR, Bream RN, Jackson PS, Leach AG, Longbottom DA, Nesi M, Scott JS, Storer RI, Taylor SJ. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1. 2000:3815–4195. [Google Scholar]; b) Corma A, Garcia H. Chem. Rev. 2003;103:4307–4365. doi: 10.1021/cr030680z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].a) Varma RS. Tetrahedron. 2002;58:1235–1255. [Google Scholar]; b) Vaccari A. Appl. Clay Sci. 1999;14:161–198. [Google Scholar]
  • [6].White AW, Almassy R, Calvert AH, Curtin NJ, Griffin RJ, Hostomsky Z, Maegley K, Newell DR, Srinivasan S, Golding BT. J. Med. Chem. 2000;43:4084–4097. doi: 10.1021/jm000950v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Morningstar ML, Roth T, Farnsworth DW, Smith MK, Watson K, Buckheit RW, Jr., Das K, Zhang W, Arnold E, Julias JG, Hughes SH, Michejda CJ. J. Med. Chem. 2007;50:4003–4015. doi: 10.1021/jm060103d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Zhu Z, Lippa B, Drach JC, Townsend LB. J. Med. Chem. 2000;43:2430–2437. doi: 10.1021/jm990290y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].a) Preston PN. Chem. Rev. 1974;74:279–314. [Google Scholar]; b) Wright JB. Chem. Rev. 1951;48:397–541. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].a) Alinezhad H, Salehian F, Biparva P. Synth. Commun. 2012;42:102–108. [Google Scholar]; b) Wang R, Lu X.-x., Yu X.-q., Shi L, Sun Y. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2007;266:198–201. [Google Scholar]; c) Hornberger KR, Adjabeng GM, Dickson HD, Davis-Ward RG. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006;47:5359–5361. [Google Scholar]; d) Wang Y, Sarris K, Sauer DR, Djuric SW. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006;47:4823–4826. [Google Scholar]; e) Lin S-Y, Isome Y, Stewart E, Liu J-F, Yohannes D, Yu L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006;47:2883–2886. [Google Scholar]; f) Tandon VK, Kumar M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004;45:4185–4187. [Google Scholar]
  • [11].a) Creencia EC, Kosaka M, Muramatsu T, Kobayashi M, Iizuka T, Horaguchi T. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2009;46:1309–1317. [Google Scholar]; b) Lin C, Lai P-T, Liao SK-S, Hung W-T, Yang W-B, Fang J-M. J. Org. Chem. 2008;73:3848–3853. doi: 10.1021/jo800234x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Ma H, Wang Y, Wang J. Heterocycles. 2006;68:1669–1673. [Google Scholar]; d) Sun P, Hu Z. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2006;43:773–775. [Google Scholar]; e) Beaulieu PL, Hache B, Von ME. Synthesis. 2003:1683–1692. [Google Scholar]; f) Chari MA, Shobha D, Sasaki T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011;52:5575–5580. [Google Scholar]; g) Panda SS, Jain SC. Synth. Commun. 2011;41:729–735. [Google Scholar]
  • [12].a) Itoh T, Nagata K, Ishikawa H, Ohsawa A. Heterocycles. 2004;63:2769–2783. [Google Scholar]; b) Curini M, Epifano F, Montanari F, Rosati O, Taccone S. Synlett. 2004:1832–1834. [Google Scholar]; c) Lin S, Yang L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005;46:4315–4319. [Google Scholar]; d) Das B, Kanth BS, Reddy KR, Kumar AS. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2008;45:1499–1502. [Google Scholar]; e) Mukhopadhyay C, Tapaswi PK. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008;49:6237–6240. [Google Scholar]
  • [13].a) Brain CT, Brunton SA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002;43:1893–1895. [Google Scholar]; b) Kim Y, Kumar MR, Park N, Heo Y, Lee S. J. Org. Chem. 2011;76:9577–9583. doi: 10.1021/jo2019416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].a) Brasche G, Buchwald SL. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008;47:1932–1934. doi: 10.1002/anie.200705420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Xiao Q, Wang W-H, Liu G, Meng F-K, Chen J-H, Yang Z, Shi Z-J. Chem.-Eur. J. 2009;15:7292–7296. doi: 10.1002/chem.200900154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].a) Blacker AJ, Farah MM, Hall MI, Marsden SP, Saidi O, Williams JMJ. Org. Lett. 2009;11:2039–2042. doi: 10.1021/ol900557u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Shiraishi Y, Sugano Y, Tanaka S, Hirai T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010;49:1656–1660. doi: 10.1002/anie.200906573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Moorthy JN, Neogi I. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011;52:3868–3871. [Google Scholar]
  • [16].a) Johnstone RAW, Wilby AH, Entwistle ID. Chem. Rev. 1985;85:129–170. [Google Scholar]; b) Brieger G, Nestrick TJ. Chem. Rev. 1974;74:567–580. [Google Scholar]
  • [17].a) Kulkarni A, Abid M, Torok B, Huang X. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009;50:1791–1794. [Google Scholar]; b) Landge SM, Schmidt A, Outerbridge V, Torok B. Synlett. 2007:1600–1604. [Google Scholar]
  • [18].a) Perumal S, Mariappan S, Selvaraj S. ARKIVOC. 2004:46–51. [Google Scholar]; b) Landge SM, Torok B. Catal. Lett. 2008;122:338–343. [Google Scholar]; c) Sharghi H, Asemani O, Tabaei SMH. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2008;45:1293–1298. [Google Scholar]; d) Varala R, Nasreen A, Enugala R, Adapa SR. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007;48:69–72. [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Insuasty BA, Torres H, Quiroga J, Abonia R, Rodriguez R, Nogueras M, Sanchez A, Saitz C, Alvarez SL, Zacchino SA. J. Chil. Chem. Soc. 2006;51:927–932. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

RESOURCES