Abstract
Ron receptor kinase (MST1R) is important in promoting epithelial tumorigenesis, but the potential contributions of its specific expression in stromal cells have not been examined. Herein, we show that the Ron receptor is expressed in mouse and human stromal cells of the prostate tumor microenvironment. To test the significance of stromal Ron expression, prostate cancer cells were orthotopically implanted into the prostates of either wild type (WT) or Ron tyrosine kinase deficient (TK−/−; Mst1r−/−) hosts. In TK−/− hosts, prostate cancer cell growth was significantly reduced compared to tumor growth in TK+/+ hosts. Prostate tumors in TK−/− hosts exhibited an increase in tumor cell apoptosis, macrophage infiltration and altered cytokine expression. Reciprocal bone marrow transplantation studies and utilizing myeloid cell specific ablation of Ron demonstrated that loss of Ron in myeloid cells is sufficient to inhibit prostate cancer cell growth. Interestingly, depletion of CD8+ T-cells, but not CD4+ T-cells, was able to restore prostate tumor growth in hosts devoid of myeloid-specific Ron expression. These studies demonstrate a critical role for the Ron receptor in the tumor microenvironment, whereby Ron loss in tumor-associated macrophages inhibits prostate cancer cell growth, at least in part, by de-repressing the activity of CD8+ T cells.
Keywords: Ron receptor, stroma, tumor microenvironment, tumor-associated macrophages, myeloid cells, receptor tyrosine kinase
Introduction
Coordinated signaling between different cell types of the stroma is required for the development and maintenance of an adult prostate secretory epithelium. The stroma also supports prostate tumor initiation and progression (1, 2). Inflammatory infiltrates are major cellular components of tumor stroma and include adaptive and innate immune cell types (3, 4). Tumor-associated immune cells support tumor growth by producing an immunosuppressive microenvironment capable of blocking productive antitumor immunity. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) play pivotal roles in tumor progression and can promote or inhibit tumor growth depending on their activation state (5, 6).
The Ron receptor tyrosine kinase is expressed on several tissue-resident macrophage populations (7–11). Ron activation in peritoneal macrophages suppresses inflammation and promotes alternative macrophage activation (12, 13). Following LPS stimulation in macrophages, Ron activation inhibits the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) while promoting expression of arginase-1, an enzyme that competes with iNOS (14, 15). iNOS-mediated nitric oxide production is cytotoxic and tumor suppressive, whereas products of arginase-1 promote tissue repair and tumorigenesis (16).
Studies from our laboratory have shown Ron to be a negative regulator of inflammation in lung injury and bacterial peritonitis models (17, 18). Utilizing mice with myeloid cell-specific Ron deletion, macrophages were identified as the major cell type regulating inflammatory responses in lung and liver injury models (19, 20). Ron signaling in peritoneal macrophages increases the phosphorylation of STAT3, suggesting an interaction between these two pathways (17, 21).
Moreover, STAT3−/− mice show similar phenotypic responses as that of Ron-deficient mice (22). Phosphorylation of STAT3 in TAMs is important for attenuating antitumor immunity by suppressing macrophage-mediated antigen presentation to cytotoxic CD8+ T-lymphocytes (23, 24). Given that Ron regulates macrophage activation and inflammation, Ron signaling in TAMs may be important for maintenance of an immunosuppressive microenvironment.
Ron is overexpressed in > 90% of human prostate cancers (25–27). Ron activation in tumor cells elicits a range of cellular responses including growth, differentiation, migration, and survival through various signaling pathways (27, 28). Gain- and loss-of-function studies in tumor epithelial cells, including human prostate cells, have shown that Ron expression is important for promoting tumor growth in vivo (29–32). Moreover, data from our laboratory has shown that mice containing a germline deletion of the Ron tyrosine kinase signaling domain exhibit significant reduction in tumor mass when bred to mice predisposed to develop prostate cancer (32). While numerous studies have outlined the importance of epithelial-expressed Ron in supporting tumorigenesis, the importance of Ron expression in the tumor stroma has not been extensively investigated. Although a recently published study outlined the importance of Ron expression in the tumor microenvironment, the Ron-expressing stromal cell lineage that supported tumor growth was not identified (13).
This study identifies Ron expression in the stroma, particularly in TAMs, to be a critical factor that supports tumor growth through the regulation of apoptosis in tumor epithelial cells. Additionally, we show that Ron expression in TAMs suppresses tumor immune surveillance through CD8+ T-cell regulation and that Ron-expressing TAMs have increased activation of STAT3. Our findings indicate that in addition to the well-established tumor-cell-autonomous role, Ron plays a novel role in TAMs by promoting tumor cell survival through cytotoxic CD8+ T-cell regulation.
Materials and Methods
Mice
Wild-type (TK+/+), Ron tyrosine kinase-deficient mice (TK−/−), homozygous Ron-floxed mice (TKf/f), and LysMcre (TKf/fLysMcre+) mice were generated and maintained in a C57BL/6 background as described (20, 33). All experiments utilized 8–12 week old male mice. For bone marrow transplantation, donor bone marrow cells from TK+/+ and TK−/− mice were injected into the tail vein of irradiated mice (Supplemental Methods). All mice were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions and were treated in accordance with protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Cincinnati.
Cell Lines and Orthotopic Injections
Murine TRAMP-C2Re3 cells were obtained from Dr. Zhongyun Dong (University of Cincinnati, OH) and grown as previously described (34). The cells are of murine origin and were tested through growth in syngeneic mice; no further validation was performed. Cells (2.5×105) were injected into the ventro-lateral prostates of mice and harvested after 30 days (26).
T-Cell Depletion
Mice were subcutaneously injected with 5×105 TRAMP-C2Re3 cells. To deplete T-cell subsets, mice were injected on days 1, 7, 14, 21, and 24 with 1mg/ml of rat monoclonal antibody that depleted specific lymphocyte subsets: mAb-GK1.5 (anti-CD4, IgG2b); mAb-2.43 (anti-CD8, IgG2b); and Rat-IgG2b isotype control antibody (35) (Bio X Cell). Tumor volume was recorded biweekly and tumors were harvested on day 28.
Cell Isolations
A single-cell suspension of normal or tumor-bearing prostate tissue was obtained by mechanical dissociation and enzymatic digestion. Enrichment for epithelial cells, fibroblasts and immune cells was completed by differential centrifugation using standard procedures (Supplemental Methods). TAMs were enriched from the immune cell fraction by magnetic beads coated with mouse CD11b according to manufacturer’s instructions. (Miltenyi Biotech). The isolated cells were >95% pure.
Flow Analysis
Immune infiltrates were treated with Fc anti-CD16/CD32 antibody and stained with antibodies that detect macrophages (anti-mCD11b), granulocytes (anti-mGr-1) and CD8+ T-cells (anti-mCD8a) (eBiosciences). Epithelial cells were stained for AnnexinV/PI, per manufacturer’s instructions (BD Biosciences). Cells were analyzed using the FACS Aria and FACS Diva software (BD Biosciences).
Luminex Array
Plasma was analyzed utilizing the Milliplex Map Mouse Cytokine/Chemokine Panel with Luminex Map detection per manufacturer’s instructions (Millipore, #MPXMCYTO-70).
Immunohistochemistry
Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections were stained for F4/80 (eBiociences), CD-31 (Dako), and α-SMA (Sigma Aldrich) using standard procedures.
Human Tissue Array and Scoring
Immunohistochemistry for Ron was performed on human prostate cancer tissue microarray specimens (IMH-303, Imgenex; TMA1202-4, Chemicon/Millipore; 75–4063, Zymed), using the Ron-α antibody (BD-Transduction Laboratories). The percentage of Ron-positive stromal cells was determined and staining intensity graded (0–3). The stromal staining index, a factor of the staining percentage and intensity, was obtained for each tissue section.
Quantitative Real-Time (qRT)-PCR and Immunoblot Analyses
qRT-PCR was performed utilizing primer pairs listed in the Supplemental Methods as previously described (20). Expression levels were normalized to β-glucuronidase and relative gene expression reported. Western analyses utilized the following antibodies: Ron-C20 (Santa-Cruz-biotechnologies) STAT3 and pSTAT3-Y705 (Cell Signaling) and Arginase-1 (BD Biosciences).
Statistical Analysis
Data are expressed as mean ± standard error (SE). Statistical significance was determined by t-tests for pairwise comparisons or ANOVA for comparison of multiple groups with Graph Pad Prism software. Significance was set at P<0.05.
Results
Ron is expressed in stromal cells of normal and tumor-bearing prostates and is critical for promoting prostate tumor growth
Ron mRNA expression was detected in primary cells isolated from the prostates of TK+/+ mice including resident prostate macrophages, epithelial cells, and fibroblasts (Figure 1A). Ron expression in human stromal cells was examined by immunohistochemistry on a panel of human prostate tissues. As depicted in Figure 1B, Ron was detected in the stromal cells of normal human prostates, benign prostate hyperplasia and prostate adenocarcinoma samples at approximately similar levels. Interestingly, Ron expression in stromal cells did not parallel its expression in the prostate epithelium, which has been previously shown to increase with disease progression (26). While the levels of stromal Ron are not altered with prostate tumor progression, the functional role of this receptor may be regulated by the availability/processing of its ligand, hepatocyte growth factor-like protein, whose expression has been reported to increase with tumor progression (36–39).
Figure 1. Ron is expressed in stromal cells of normal and tumor-bearing prostates and is important for promoting prostate tumor growth.
(A) qRT-PCR analysis of Ron mRNA expression in cells isolated from TK+/+ mice. The expression of Ron in whole TK+/+ and TK−/− prostates is shown for comparison. Expression levels are representative of two independent isolations. (B) Ron expression in human prostate tissue specimens. A representative human prostate adenocarcinoma section depicting positive Ron staining in both epithelial (E) and stromal (S) compartments. The horizontal line in the scatter plot represents the mean ± SE. (C) TRAMP-C2Re3 cells were injected into the prostates of TK+/+ and TK−/− mice; tumor weights were determined 30 days post-implantation. (TK+/+, n=36; TK−/−, n=33, *P<0.0001). Red line = average weight (0.18±0.012g) of normal prostates from TK+/+ mice. (D) Hematoxylin and eosin-stained TK+/+ and TK−/− prostate tumor sections showing similar tissue architecture. Scale bar = 100μm.
The role of Ron expression in the tumor microenvironment was assessed after orthotopic transplantation of TRAMP-C2Re3 prostate cancer cells into the prostates of TK+/+ and TK−/− mice. TRAMP-C2Re3 cells were able to grow in TK+/+ and TK−/− animals; however, growth was markedly inhibited in the TK−/− host microenvironment with an average prostate weight of 1.10±0.20g in TK+/+ mice compared to 0.27±0.05g in TK−/− mice (Figure 1C). Histological analysis of the TRAMP-C2Re3 cells from the prostates of TK+/+ and TK−/− hosts revealed similarities in tissue architecture (Figure 1D). These findings demonstrate that Ron expression in the prostate tumor microenvironment is a critical mediator of prostate tumor growth.
Comparison of the stromal compartment in TK+/+ and TK−/− prostates following TRAMP-C2Re3 cell implantation
To characterize the host environment following transplantation of TRAMP-C2Re3 cells into the prostates of TK+/+ and TK−/− mice, histological sections were stained for cell-surface markers. F4/80 staining showed significantly more macrophage infiltration in tumors from TK−/− hosts compared to tumors from TK+/+ hosts (Figure 2A). Interestingly, tumor macrophage distribution was distinct within each group, with macrophages observed around the tumor periphery in prostates from TK+/+ mice as opposed to diffuse intratumoral macrophages in tumors from TK−/− mice. Flow analyses confirmed increased macrophage infiltration in tumors from TK−/− hosts compared to controls (Supplementary Figure S1A). To examine Ron-dependent macrophage migration in vitro, the murine macrophage cell line, MH-S cells, without (shNT) and with Ron knockdown (shRon) were utilized (11). Loss of Ron in these cells significantly increased their migration potential compared to the controls (Supplementary Figure S1B).
Figure 2. Characterization of stromal cells in TRAMP-C2Re3 tumors from TK+/+ and TK−/− prostates.
(A) Representative F4/80 staining of TRAMP-C2Re3 tumors from TK+/+ and TK−/− mice. Differences in the spatial distribution of macrophages are noted with red arrows depicting tumor peripheral infiltration while green arrows depict intratumoral infiltration. Macrophages were quantitated and the data represents the mean number of F4/80+ macrophages per 40X field (five fields per tumor, TK+/+, n=5; TK−/−, n=5, *P<0.05). Scale bar = 50μm. (B) Representative images showing CD31 staining in microvessels and quantification of the microvessel density per tumor area (*P<0.01). Scale bar = 100μm. (C) α-SMA–positive fibroblasts in the tumors and the average intensity of α-SMA expression per 40X field (*P<0.01). Scale bar = 50μm.
The impact of stromal Ron on tumor vascularization was determined by microvessel staining which showed a significant increase in microvessel density in tumors from TK+/+ hosts compared to tumors in TK−/− mice (Figure 2B). Immunohistochemistry for tumor-associated myofibroblasts showed an increase in α-SMA staining in tumors from TK−/− prostates compared to controls (Figure 2C). Taken together, our data show that Ron signaling in the host regulates key events linked with tumor malignancy including angiogenesis, α-SMA expression, and macrophage infiltration.
Lack of host Ron expression promotes prostate cancer cell apoptosis
Given the significant difference in tumor size in TK+/+ versus TK−/− host environments, we examined tumor cell proliferation and death. There was no difference in proliferation of the transplanted TRAMP-C2Re3 cells (data not shown). However, a 2-fold increase in necrosis was noted in histological sections of tumors from TK−/− compared to TK+/+ hosts (Figure 3A). To evaluate differences in survival between groups, tumor cells from each host genotype were isolated and examined by AnnexinV/PI staining. A significant increase in the number of apoptotic (AnnexinV+PI−) and dead cells (AnnexinV+PI+ and AnnexinV−PI+) was detected in TRAMP-C2Re3 tumor cells isolated from TK−/− hosts compared to controls (Figure 3B). These data are consistent with immunohistochemistry for cleaved caspase-3, which demonstrated an appreciable increase in the number of activated/cleaved caspase-3–positive tumor cells from TK−/− hosts compared to controls (data not shown). Furthermore, AnnexinV/PI staining on the F4/80 positive macrophages showed a trend towards increased cell death in the TK−/− macrophages compared to TK+/+. However, this latter observation may be attributed to the increased necrotic environment observed in tumors from TK−/− hosts (Supplementary Figure S2 and Figure 3A).
Figure 3. Lack of Ron signaling in the host leads to increases in tumor necrosis and apoptosis.
(A) Quantification of necrotic areas in TRAMP-C2Re3 tumor sections from TK+/+ and TK−/− hosts. Representative tissue sections are shown. Scale bar = 1cm. (B) Flow analysis for AnnexinV/PI on TRAMP-C2Re3 tumor cells isolated from TK+/+ and TK−/− hosts. A representative flow plot is shown with a histogram depicting data from all experiments (TK+/+, n=4; TK−/−, n=3). Data are the mean percentage of cells in early apoptosis (AnnexinV+PI−), late apoptosis (AnnexinV+PI+), dead cells (AnnexinV−PI+), and live/viable cells (AnnexinV−PI−) ± SE.
Ron regulation of the inflammatory tumor microenvironment is associated with STAT3 activation in TAMs
We next examined the inflammatory milieu in tumor-bearing TK+/+ and TK−/− hosts. A 3-fold increase in iNOS mRNA was observed in tumors isolated from TK−/− mice compared to controls (Figure 4A). Increased iNOS protein from tumors in TK−/− hosts was confirmed by Western analysis (data not shown). Blood nitrite levels were also increased in the sera from tumor-bearing TK−/− animals (Figure 4B). Expression of IL-9, MIG, and IL-17 was significantly greater in tumor-bearing TK−/− sera while M-CSF was higher in TK+/+ sera (Figure 4C). Intratumoral gene expression examined by qRT-PCR showed significant increases in MIG and TNF-α expression in tumors from TK−/− hosts as well as a significant increase in TGF-β in tumors from TK+/+ hosts (Supplementary Figure S3A). Significant increases in the intratumoral expression of STAT1, CXCR3, IL-12b, and ICOS were observed in tumor cells from TK−/− hosts compared to controls while CD80 and IL-27 levels did not change (Figure 4D).
Figure 4. Loss of Ron leads to changes in the inflammatory tumor microenvironment and loss of STAT3 phosphorylation in TAMs.
(A) qRT-PCR analyses for iNOS mRNA in TRAMP-C2Re3 tumors from TK+/+ and TK−/− hosts. Data represented as relative change compared to β-glucuronidase (TK+/+, n=5; TK−/−, n=5, *P<0.01). (B) Concentration of serum nitrite from TRAMP-C2Re3 tumor-bearing TK+/+ and TK−/− mice. (TK+/+, n=5; TK−/−, n=5, *P<0.05). (C) Levels of inflammatory cytokines in the serum of tumor-bearing mice. (TK+/+, n=5; TK−/−, n=5, *P<0.05) (D) Gene expression for T-cell regulatory genes depicted as fold change in TK−/− tumors over controls. (E) Western analysis for pSTAT3-Y705 and Total STAT3 in TAMs isolated from orthotopic TRAMP-C2Re3 tumors from TK+/+ and TK−/− mice and is representative of four independent isolations.
To examine signaling pathways in the TK+/+ versus TK−/− microenvironment that may account for altered cytokine expression, TAMs were isolated from TK+/+ and TK−/− tumors. Western analysis of TAMs from TK−/− hosts tumors showed a significant reduction in phosphorylated (p)STAT3 compared to controls (Figure 4E). TAMs were isolated by CD11b coated magnetic bead pulldown assays and cells from this isolation included both CD11b+Gr1− (TAMs) and CD11b+Gr1+ (myeloid-derived-suppressor cells, MDSCs) cells. We refer to this population as TAMs hereafter as flow cytometry analysis demonstrated a 7.3-fold higher number of CD11b+Gr1− compared to CD11b+Gr1+ cells (data not shown). qRT-PCR analysis of flow-sorted immune cells demonstrated Ron mRNA expression in the various myeloid cell populations including CD11b+Gr1− (TAMs), CD11b+ Gr1+ (MDSCs) and to a lesser extent in CD11b−Gr1+ (granulocytes) (Supplementary Figure S3B). Ron protein expression in TAMs isolated from TRAMP-C2Re3 tumors from TK+/+ mice is also depicted by Western analysis (Supplementary Figure S3B).
TK−/− bone marrow-derived cells inhibit the growth of TRAMP-C2Re3 cells in chimeric TK+/+ mice
Given the role of Ron in regulating macrophage activation, as well as the increase in proinflammatory cytokines observed in the TK−/− microenvironment, we next determined whether the hematopoietic compartment of TK−/− mice is sufficient to inhibit TRAMP-C2Re3 tumor growth in vivo. Utilizing reciprocal bone marrow transplantation experiments, TK+/+ and TK−/− mice were irradiated and reconstituted with either TK+/+ or TK−/− donor bone marrow to generate the following groups TK+/+→TK+/+ (irradiated TK+/+ mice transplanted with TK+/+ donor marrow), TK−/−→TK−/−, TK+/+→TK−/− and TK−/−→TK+/+. Following bone marrow reconstitution, the chimeras were intraprostatically injected with TRAMP-C2Re3 cells and tumor weight was measured after 30 days. TRAMP-C2Re3 cells injected into non-irradiated TK+/+ and TK−/− mice served as controls. qRT-PCR analysis for Ron expression on whole bone marrow-derived cells and on CD11b+ TAMs isolated from tumors indicated efficient reconstitution (82%) of donor-derived bone marrow cells into recipient animals (Figure 5A–5B). At baseline, no appreciable differences in the number of myeloid precursor cells were noted between genotypes (Supplementary Figure S4).
Figure 5. TK−/− bone marrow-derived cells decrease the growth of TRAMP-C2Re3 tumors in TK+/+ chimeras.
(A) Ron mRNA in bone marrow cells isolated from tumor-bearing TK+/+, TK−/− or chimeric mice. (B) Ron mRNA expression in TAMs isolated from TRAMP-C2Re3 tumors from TK+/+→TK−/− and TK−/−→TK+/+ chimeric mice. (C) Tumor weights determined at day 30 after intraprostatic injection of TRAMP-C2Re3 cells into TK+/+, TK−/− and bone marrow transplantation mice. Tumor progression in both chimeras was delayed compared to TK+/+→TK+/+ mice (*P<0.05). Data are pooled from two independent experiments. (TK+/+, n=7; TK−/−, n=6; TK+/+→TK+/+, n=5; TK−/−→TK−/−, n=5; TK+/+→TK−/−, n=24; TK−/−→TK+/+, n=24; *P<0.05). (D) FACS analysis for tumor immune infiltrates in TRAMP-C2Re3 tumors from TK+/+→TK−/− and TK−/−→TK+/+ chimeric mice. Tumors from TK+/+→TK−/− chimeric mice had significantly more macrophages (CD11b+ Gr1− cells) compared to tumors from TK−/−→TK+/+ chimeric mice. Data are mean percentage of cells ± SE (TK+/+→TK−/−, n=2; TK−/−→TK+/+, n=2; *P<0.01).
Irradiation had no effect on the growth of TRAMP-C2Re3 cells (Figure 5C). However, tumor growth was significantly delayed in TK+/+→TK−/− and TK−/−→TK+/+ chimeras relative to TK+/+→TK+/+ mice. Interestingly, tumor growth in TK+/+→TK−/− and TK−/−→TK+/+ mice was not significantly different from growth in TK−/−→TK−/− mice. These data indicate that tumor growth in Ron-deficient animals is due to contributions by hematopoietic and non-hematopoietic cells in the host microenvironment, as TK+/+ bone marrow-derived cells were not sufficient to restore tumor growth in TK−/− animals. In contrast, TK−/− bone marrow-derived cells significantly reduced tumor growth in TK+/+ animals. Analysis of tumor infiltrates from the chimeric mice demonstrated a significant infiltration of TK−/− donor-derived macrophages compared to TK+/+ donor macrophages (Figure 5D) similar to that observed with TK−/−macrophages from tumors of TK−/− mice (Figure 2A, Supplementary Figure S1).
Myeloid-specific Ron loss is sufficient to decrease prostate tumor cell growth
To delineate the Ron-expressing hematopoietic cell type that influences tumor growth, we crossed LysMcre+ mice with TKf/f to generate TKf/fLysMcre+ mice. LysMcre+ mice specifically express Cre recombinase in myeloid cells and efficiently delete Ron in this cell population (19, 20). To test the efficiency of Ron deletion in TAMs, TRAMP-C2Re3 cells were intraprostatically injected into TKf/f control and TKf/fLysMcre+ mice and TAMs were isolated 30 days post transplantation. A dramatic loss of Ron mRNA expression (>90%) was observed in TAMs isolated from TKf/fLysMcre+ tumors compared to TAMs from TKf/f tumors (Figure 6A). To test the functional importance of Ron-expressing myeloid cells, prostate tumor weight was compared across genotypes. Growth of TRAMP-C2Re3 cells was significantly reduced in TKf/fLysMcre+ animals compared to controls (Figure 6B). Flow analysis for AnnexinV/PI on tumors from TKf/fLysMcre+ mice demonstrated a significant increase in total apoptotic and dead cells compared to controls, signifying that lack of Ron in myeloid cells is sufficient to inhibit tumor growth through a mechanism that induces tumor-cell apoptosis (Figure 6C). Immunohistochemistry for macrophages on tumors from TKf/f and TKf/fLysMcre+ mice indicated a significant increase in macrophage numbers in TKf/fLysMcre+ tumors compared to controls, thus reaffirming studies whereby Ron-deficient macrophages localize to the tumors in greater numbers (Figure 6D). Moreover, iNOS expression was increased in tumors from TKf/fLysMcre+ mice (Figure 6E). Western analysis on TAMs isolated from TKf/fLysMcre+ tumors showed significantly less pSTAT3 and arginase-1 expression than TKf/f TAMs (Figure 6F–6G). Despite the similarities in tumor growth, no differences were observed in microvessel density of tumors transplanted into TKf/fLysMcre+ mice and TKf/f compared to tumors from TK−/− mice, suggesting that myeloid-specific Ron deletion does not replicate a complete Ron deficiency (Supplementary Figure S5). Combined, these studies demonstrate that Ron signaling in macrophages/myeloid cells promotes tumor growth and is associated with STAT3 activation, increased arginase-1 and decreased iNOS.
Figure 6. Loss of Ron signaling in myeloid cells is sufficient to abrogate TRAMP-C2Re3 tumor growth.
(A) Ron mRNA in TAMs isolated from TRAMP-C2Re3 tumors from TKf/f and TKf/fLysMcre+ mice. Data represented as relative change from two independent TAM isolations. (B) TRAMP-C2Re3 cells were injected into the prostates of TKf/f and TKf/fLysMcre+ mice and tumor weight determined after 30 days (TKf/f, n=15; TKf/fLysMcre+, n=13; *P<0.001). Data represent two independent experiments. (C) FACS analysis for AnnexinV/PI on epithelial cells isolated from TKf/f and TKf/fLysMcre+ mice 23 days post-tumor cell implantation (TKf/f, n=4; TKf/fLysMcre+, n=4; *P<0.01). (D) Quantification for F4/80 on TRAMP-C2Re3 tumor sections from TKf/f and TKf/fLysMcre+. Data represented as mean F4/80+ cells per 40X field. (TKf/f, n=5; TKf/fLysMcre+, n=5; *P<0.05). (E) qRT-PCR for iNOS expression in TRAMP-C2Re3 tumors from TKf/f and TKf/fLysMcre+ mice. (F) Western analysis of pSTAT3-Y705 and Total STAT3 in TAMs isolated from TRAMP-C2Re3 tumors from TKf/f and TKf/fLysMcre+ mice. (G) Western analysis of arginase-1 expression in TAMs isolated from TRAMP-C2Re3 tumors from TKf/f and TKf/fLysMcre+ mice. F and G are representative of four independent TAM isolations.
CD8+T-cells are essential for the antitumor immune response in TK−/− animals
Flow cytometry and qRT-PCR analyses of tumors for T-cells showed an increase in CD8+ T-cells in tumors from TK−/− hosts compared to the controls, although this number was not significant (Supplementary Figure S6A–S6B). To determine if macrophage-mediated education of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells was important for reduced tumor burden in TK−/− mice, mice were depleted of CD4+, CD8+, or both T-cell subsets by injection of cytotoxic monoclonal antibodies. To allow for accurate measurement of tumor growth, TRAMP-C2Re3 cells were injected subcutaneously and tumor growth was assessed biweekly. The efficiency with which T-cell subsets were depleted was determined by flow analysis (>99%) for T-cell subset markers on splenocytes obtained at the time of sacrifice (Supplementary Figure S6C). As shown in Figure 7A, TRAMP-C2Re3 cells grew similarly in the TK+/+ and TK−/− mice in the subcutaneous environment compared to the prostate microenvironment (Figure 1C), wherein a 3-fold increase in tumor growth was observed in the TK+/+ mice as compared to TK−/− mice; however, TRAMP-C2Re3 cells implanted orthotopically grew approximately 2-fold faster than cells implanted subcutaneously, in spite of the reduced inoculum cell numbers (40).
Figure 7. Depletion of CD8+ T-cells restores TRAMP-C2Re3 tumor growth in Ron-deficient mice.
(A) Growth curve of subcutaneously injected TRAMP-C2Re3 cells in TK+/+ and TK−/− mice administered with cytotoxic monoclonal antibodies against CD4+ T-cells, CD8+ T-cells, both T-cell subsets, or an isotype control (n=3 per genotype/group). (B) Final tumor volume of TRAMP-C2Re3 cells from TK+/+ and TK−/− mice at 28 days post injection. (C) Growth of TRAMP-C2Re3 cells in control and TKf/fLysMcre+ mice treated with cytotoxic monoclonal antibodies against CD8+ T-cells or an isotype control (n=3 per genotype/group). (D) Final tumor volumes from control and TKf/fLysMcre+ mice at 28 days.
Depletion of CD4+ T-cells had a limited effect on tumor growth in both genotypes, as tumor growth in TK+/+ versus TK−/− mice was similar to that of isotype treated controls (Figure 7A–7B). In contrast, depletion of CD8+ T-cells restored tumor growth in TK−/− animals to that of controls. Depletion of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell subsets resulted in similar growth rates in TK+/+ and TK−/− mice; however, a dramatic increase in tumor growth was observed in both genotypes.
Depletion of CD8+ T-cells in TKf/fLysMcre+ mice restores TRAMP-C2Re3 tumor growth
To determine if Ron loss in macrophages was sufficient to engage an antitumor immune response, CD8+ T-cell depletion studies were performed in TKf/f and TKf/fLysMcre+ tumor-bearing mice. Depletion of CD8+ T-cells in TKf/fLysMcre mice abolished the antitumor immune response (Figure 7C–7D). Taken together, our results indicate that Ron expression in the tumor microenvironment, specifically in macrophages, aids in evasion of tumor immune surveillance by impacting CD8+ T-cell function.
Discussion
Tumors are regulated by complex signaling networks involving interactions between malignant epithelial cells and the adjacent stroma. While many publications have reported the importance of tumor-stromal interactions for supporting tumor growth, further investigations are required for the identification of the stromal cellular mediators and their associated signaling networks that promote tumorigenesis. In this report, we provide compelling evidence supporting the novel role for the Ron receptor in regulating tumor growth by virtue of its signaling in host bone marrow-derived cells, particularly myeloid cells, of the tumor microenvironment.
Myeloid cells and bone marrow-derived precursors are recruited to tumors and promote tumor growth, neovascularization, and aid in antitumor immune suppression (3, 41). Our experiments indicate that Ron loss in macrophages increases their localization to tumors and is associated with decreased tumor growth. Interestingly, this influx of macrophages into tumors was only observed in the presence of TK−/− bone marrow-derived cells, even in the context of bone marrow transplantation experiments (Figure 3A, 6D). Furthermore, TK−/− mice were on par with wild types as they exhibited similar numbers of bone marrow-derived cells and hematological values [Supplementary Figure S4 and (33)]. These results suggest that Ron deficiency does not affect the number and development of the hematopoietic cell lineages, but instead improves localization of macrophages to tumors. Loss of Ron expression in the host environment also resulted in an increase in the expression of inflammatory cytokines including IL-9, MIG, IL-17, and TNF-α, which are known to promote macrophage infiltration and inhibit tumor growth through mechanisms that regulate phagocytic activity or support the activation of effector cells of the innate and adaptive immune responses. Alternatively, the increase in TK−/− TAMs in either host genotype may be due to the need to clear cellular debris. The underlying mechanism that leads to the increased localization of macrophages to tumors in the presence of TK−/− bone marrow-derived cells as well as the functional significances of increased macrophage numbers on tumor growth warrants further investigation.
In addition to the increased influx of Ron-deficient macrophages to tumors, our data show that a conditional loss of Ron in myeloid cells is sufficient to inhibit tumor growth in vivo. These studies are analogous to several previous studies which demonstrated decreased tumor growth in mice harboring myeloid-specific deletions of IKKβ (42), STAT3 (43, 44), HIF-1α (45) and HIF-2α (46). A previous study on IKKβ has shown that deletion of this gene in either epithelial cells (enterocytes) or myeloid cells reduces colitis-associated cancer. In this study, enterocyte IKKβ expression promoted tumorigenesis by suppressing apoptosis while myeloid expression enhanced tumor growth by controlling the production of inflammatory mediators, showing distinct roles for the protein in different cell types (42). The cell-type specific regulation of tumor growth by Ron is similar to that observed for IKKβ. Published studies have shown that loss of Ron in prostate cancer epithelial cells leads to a reduction in tumor growth by promoting epithelial cell apoptosis and limiting tumor vascularization (26, 32). In myeloid cells, Ron loss leads to increased tumor cell apoptosis associated with alterations in the inflammatory microenvironment and is independent of an effect on blood vessel formation Of note, our data utilizing bone marrow transplantation in chimeric mice suggested that in addition to hematopoietic cells, other non-hematopoietic Ron expressing stromal cell types contribute to tumor progression. These data reinforce the notion of multiple cell-type specific roles for Ron in promoting tumor growth.
Previous studies from our laboratory in peritoneal macrophages have shown that Ron activation enhances macrophage STAT3 phosphorylation, while macrophages from TK−/− mice exhibit decreased STAT3 activation (17). Consistent with this data, our current study shows that Ron loss is associated with lower STAT3 activity in TAMs. STAT3 signaling in macrophages attenuates antitumor immunity in a variety of in vivo tumor models (23, 47). Similar to the studies in this report, disruption of STAT3 in myeloid cells through the use of LysMcre mice enhanced the ability of macrophages to stimulate CD8+ T-cell activity in response to tumor antigens (23). Ron signaling may also regulate T-cell activity through the induction of T-cell anergy by downregulating the expression of costimulatory molecules or regulating cytokine/chemokine production. A significant induction in costimulatory molecules CXCR3 and ICOS as well as an induction of IL-9, iNOS, MIG were observed in tumors taken from TK−/− compared to wild-type hosts, suggesting multiple components downstream of Ron that may regulate T-cell activity. While further studies are needed to determine the mechanism(s) by which myeloid-specific Ron signaling regulates tumor growth, our experiments with depletion of CD8+ T-cells in TKf/fLysMcre+ mice suggest that Ron loss in myeloid cells leads to enhanced tumor cell death through a mechanism that may depend upon STAT3 signaling and the activation of the immune response. Moreover, given the lack of current technologies to effectively target transcription factors such as STAT3, targeting Ron may serve as an important surrogate to activate the immune response for cancer therapy.
In addition to alterations in the immune response, Ron signaling has been shown to regulate key metabolites that support an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Ron activation in macrophages results in the inhibition of iNOS and increased arginase-1 expression (15, 33). iNOS expression in tumor tissues has been shown to be either pro- or anti-tumorigenic, depending on the level of expression and the duration of NO (48). Consistent with published observations, Ron loss in the tumor microenvironment increased local expression of iNOS. This increase in iNOS expression may be partly attributed to the expression of Ron in myeloid cells, as tumors from TKf/fLysMcre+ mice also displayed increases in iNOS levels compared to controls. Taken together, our data suggest that Ron expression in myeloid cells is important for regulating the fine balance of iNOS expression, which may skew the microenvironment towards a tumor-promoting state. Conversely, expression of arginase-1 has been reported to protect tissue from damage. Consistently, our data show that Ron-deficient TAMs exhibited significant decreases in arginase-1 levels. The downregulation of arginase-1 in Ron-deficient TAMs may be significant, as arginase-1 and arginine have been shown to be important in regulating a variety of T-cell activities including proliferation, differentiation and activation (49, 50).
In summary, our data suggest a new role for Ron in regulating tumor intrinsic and extrinsic circuits within the tumor microenvironment. In light of immune impairment in individuals with cancer, short-term blockade of Ron in a controlled manner, such as the infusion of Ron-inhibited macrophages, may reverse the immunosuppressive microenvironment and activate antitumor immune responses. Further research in dissecting bidirectional signaling and the context-dependent role of Ron in cancer may provide a novel therapeutic strategy to improve the efficacy of cancer therapy.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Financial Support: This work was supported by Public Health Service Grants CA125379 (SEW), DK73552 (SEW) and P30 DK078392 from the National Institutes of Health and by an award from the Department of Defense Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program PC101840 (DG).
The authors thank Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center-Comprehensive Mouse and Cancer Core, William Stuart, Glenn Doerman and Drs. Diaz-Meco, Duran, Plas, Barger, and Benight for assistance with this project.
Footnotes
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Authors Contributions
The author(s) have made the following declarations about their contributions: Conceived and designed experiments: DG and SEW. Performed experiments: DG, JKG, PP, and RMK. Analyzed the data: DG and SEW. Wrote the paper: DG and SEW. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SEW and FDF.
References
- 1.Condon MS. The role of the stromal microenvironment in prostate cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. 2005;15:132–7. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2004.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Grossfeld GDSWH, Tlsty TD, Cunha GR. The role of stroma in prostatic carcinogenesis. Endocrine-Related Cancer. 1998;5:253–70. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Whiteside TL. The tumor microenvironment and its role in promoting tumor growth. Oncogene. 2008;27:5904–12. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Qian BZ, Pollard JW. Macrophage diversity enhances tumor progression and metastasis. Cell. 2010;141:39–51. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Condeelis J, Pollard JW. Macrophages: obligate partners for tumor cell migration, invasion, and metastasis. Cell. 2006;124:263–6. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sica A, Larghi P, Mancino A, Rubino L, Porta C, Totaro MG, et al. Macrophage polarization in tumour progression. Semin Cancer Biol. 2008;18:349–55. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2008.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kurihara N, Iwama A, Tatsumi J, Ikeda K, Suda T. Macrophage-stimulating protein activates STK receptor tyrosine kinase on osteoclasts and facilitates bone resorption by osteoclast-like cells. Blood. 1996;87:3704–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Brunelleschi S, Penengo L, Lavagno L, Santoro C, Colangelo D, Viano I, et al. Macrophage stimulating protein (MSP) evokes superoxide anion production by human macrophages of different origin. Br J Pharmacol. 2001;134:1285–95. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Iwama A, Wang MH, Yamaguchi N, Ohno N, Okano K, Sudo T, et al. Terminal differentiation of murine resident peritoneal macrophages is characterized by expression of the STK protein tyrosine kinase, a receptor for macrophage-stimulating protein. Blood. 1995;86:3394–403. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nanney LB, Skeel A, Luan J, Polis S, Richmond A, Wang MH, et al. Proteolytic cleavage and activation of pro-macrophage-stimulating protein and upregulation of its receptor in tissue injury. J Invest Dermatol. 1998;111:573–81. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1998.00332.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nikolaidis NM, Gray JK, Gurusamy D, Fox W, Stuart WD, Huber N, et al. Ron receptor tyrosine kinase negatively regulates TNFalpha production in alveolar macrophages by inhibiting NF-kappaB activity and Adam17 production. Shock. 2010;33:197–204. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e3181ae8155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ray M, Yu S, Sharda DR, Wilson CB, Liu Q, Kaushal N, et al. Inhibition of TLR4-induced IkappaB kinase activity by the RON receptor tyrosine kinase and its ligand, macrophage-stimulating protein. J Immunol. 2010;185:7309–16. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sharda DR, Yu S, Ray M, Squadrito ML, De Palma M, Wynn TA, et al. Regulation of macrophage arginase expression and tumor growth by the ron receptor tyrosine kinase. J Immunol. 2011;187:2181–92. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Morrison AC, Correll PH. Activation of the stem cell-derived tyrosine kinase/RON receptor tyrosine kinase by macrophage-stimulating protein results in the induction of arginase activity in murine peritoneal macrophages. J Immunol. 2002;168:853–60. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.2.853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chen YQ, Fisher JH, Wang MH. Activation of the RON receptor tyrosine kinase inhibits inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression by murine peritoneal exudate macrophages: phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase is required for RON-mediated inhibition of iNOS expression. J Immunol. 1998;161:4950–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chang CI, Liao JC, Kuo L. Macrophage arginase promotes tumor cell growth and suppresses nitric oxide-mediated tumor cytotoxicity. Cancer Res. 2001;61:1100–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Caldwell CC, Martignoni A, Leonis MA, Ondiveeran HK, Fox-Robichaud AE, Waltz SE. Ron receptor tyrosine kinase-dependent hepatic neutrophil recruitment and survival benefit in a murine model of bacterial peritonitis. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:1585–93. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318170a8c2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.McDowell SA, Mallakin A, Bachurski CJ, Toney-Earley K, Prows DR, Bruno T, et al. The role of the receptor tyrosine kinase Ron in nickel-induced acute lung injury. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2002;26:99–104. doi: 10.1165/ajrcmb.26.1.4621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nikolaidis NM, Kulkarni RM, Gray JK, Collins MH, Waltz SE. Ron receptor deficient alveolar myeloid cells exacerbate LPS-induced acute lung injury in the murine lung. Innate Immun. 2011;17:499–507. doi: 10.1177/1753425910383725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Stuart WD, Kulkarni RM, Gray JK, Vasiliauskas J, Leonis MA, Waltz SE. Ron receptor regulates Kupffer cell-dependent cytokine production and hepatocyte survival following endotoxin exposure in mice. Hepatology. 2011;53:1618–28. doi: 10.1002/hep.24239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wilson CB, Ray M, Lutz M, Sharda D, Xu J, Hankey PA. The RON receptor tyrosine kinase regulates IFN-gamma production and responses in innate immunity. J Immunol. 2008;181:2303–10. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.4.2303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fu XY. STAT3 in immune responses and inflammatory bowel diseases. Cell Res. 2006;16:214–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.cr.7310029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Brayer J, Cheng F, Wang H, Horna P, Vicente-Suarez I, Pinilla-Ibarz J, et al. Enhanced CD8 T cell cross-presentation by macrophages with targeted disruption of STAT3. Immunol Lett. 2010;131:126–30. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2010.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yu H, Pardoll D, Jove R. STATs in cancer inflammation and immunity: a leading role for STAT3. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9:798–809. doi: 10.1038/nrc2734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.O’Toole JM, Rabenau KE, Burns K, Lu D, Mangalampalli V, Balderes P, et al. Therapeutic implications of a human neutralizing antibody to the macrophage-stimulating protein receptor tyrosine kinase (RON), a c-MET family member. Cancer Res. 2006;66:9162–70. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Thobe MN, Gurusamy D, Pathrose P, Waltz SE. The Ron receptor tyrosine kinase positively regulates angiogenic chemokine production in prostate cancer cells. Oncogene. 2010;29:214–26. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wagh PK, Peace BE, Waltz SE. Met-related receptor tyrosine kinase Ron in tumor growth and metastasis. Adv Cancer Res. 2008;100:1–33. doi: 10.1016/S0065-230X(08)00001-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Leonis MA, Thobe MN, Waltz SE. Ron-receptor tyrosine kinase in tumorigenesis and metastasis. Future Oncol. 2007;3:441–8. doi: 10.2217/14796694.3.4.441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Peace BE, Toney-Earley K, Collins MH, Waltz SE. Ron receptor signaling augments mammary tumor formation and metastasis in a murine model of breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2005;65:1285–93. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zinser GM, Leonis MA, Toney K, Pathrose P, Thobe M, Kader SA, et al. Mammary-specific Ron receptor overexpression induces highly metastatic mammary tumors associated with beta-catenin activation. Cancer Res. 2006;66:11967–74. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Thomas RM, Toney K, Fenoglio-Preiser C, Revelo-Penafiel MP, Hingorani SR, Tuveson DA, et al. The RON receptor tyrosine kinase mediates oncogenic phenotypes in pancreatic cancer cells and is increasingly expressed during pancreatic cancer progression. Cancer Res. 2007;67:6075–82. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Thobe MN, Gray JK, Gurusamy D, Paluch AM, Wagh PK, Pathrose P, et al. The Ron receptor promotes prostate tumor growth in the TRAMP mouse model. Oncogene. 2011 doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Waltz SE, Eaton L, Toney-Earley K, Hess KA, Peace BE, Ihlendorf JR, et al. Ron-mediated cytoplasmic signaling is dispensable for viability but is required to limit inflammatory responses. J Clin Invest. 2001;108:567–76. doi: 10.1172/JCI11881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Olson MV, Lee J, Zhang F, Wang A, Dong Z. Inducible nitric oxide synthase activity is essential for inhibition of prostatic tumor growth by interferon-beta gene therapy. Nature. 2006;13:676–85. doi: 10.1038/sj.cgt.7700941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Welm BE, Dijkgraaf GJ, Bledau AS, Welm AL, Werb Z. Lentiviral transduction of mammary stem cells for analysis of gene function during development and cancer. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;2:90–102. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2007.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Cheng N, Bhowmick NA, Chytil A, Gorksa AE, Brown KA, Muraoka R, et al. Loss of TGF-beta type II receptor in fibroblasts promotes mammary carcinoma growth and invasion through upregulation of TGF-alpha-, MSP- and HGF-mediated signaling networks. Oncogene. 2005;24:5053–68. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bhatt AS, Welm A, Farady CJ, Vasquez M, Wilson K, Craik CS. Coordinate expression and functional profiling identify an extracellular proteolytic signaling pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:5771–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0606514104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sato S, Hanibuchi M, Kuramoto T, Yamamori N, Goto H, Ogawa H, et al. Macrophage stimulating protein promotes liver metastases of small cell lung cancer cells by affecting the organ microenvironment. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2012 doi: 10.1007/s10585-012-9540-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Eckerich C, Schulte A, Martens T, Zapf S, Westphal M, Lamszus K. RON receptor tyrosine kinase in human gliomas: expression, function, and identification of a novel soluble splice variant. J Neurochem. 2009;109:969–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06027.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Liotta LA, Kohn EC. The microenvironment of the tumour-host interface. Cancer Gene Therapy. 2001;411:375–9. doi: 10.1038/35077241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Murdoch C, Muthana M, Coffelt SB, Lewis CE. The role of myeloid cells in the promotion of tumour angiogenesis. Nature reviews Cancer. 2008;8:618–31. doi: 10.1038/nrc2444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Greten FR, Karin M. The IKK/NF-kappaB activation pathway-a target for prevention and treatment of cancer. Cancer Lett. 2004;206:193–9. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2003.08.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Grivennikov S, Karin E, Terzic J, Mucida D, Yu GY, Vallabhapurapu S, et al. IL-6 and Stat3 are required for survival of intestinal epithelial cells and development of colitis-associated cancer. Cancer Cell. 2009;15:103–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kortylewski M, Kujawski M, Wang T, Wei S, Zhang S, Pilon-Thomas S, et al. Inhibiting Stat3 signaling in the hematopoietic system elicits multicomponent antitumor immunity. Nat Med. 2005;11:1314–21. doi: 10.1038/nm1325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Doedens AL, Stockmann C, Rubinstein MP, Liao D, Zhang N, DeNardo DG, et al. Macrophage expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha suppresses T-cell function and promotes tumor progression. Cancer research. 2010;70:7465–75. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Roda JM, Sumner LA, Evans R, Phillips GS, Marsh CB, Eubank TD. Hypoxia-inducible factor-2alpha regulates GM-CSF-derived soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 production from macrophages and inhibits tumor growth and angiogenesis. Journal of immunology. 2011;187:1970–6. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1100841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Zhang L, Alizadeh D, Van Handel M, Kortylewski M, Yu H, Badie B. Stat3 inhibition activates tumor macrophages and abrogates glioma growth in mice. Glia. 2009;57:1458–67. doi: 10.1002/glia.20863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Fukumura D, Kashiwagi S, Jain RK. The role of nitric oxide in tumour progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:521–34. doi: 10.1038/nrc1910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Stempin CC, Dulgerian LR, Garrido VV, Cerban FM. Arginase in parasitic infections: macrophage activation, immunosuppression, and intracellular signals. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010:683485. doi: 10.1155/2010/683485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Huber S, Hoffmann R, Muskens F, Voehringer D. Alternatively activated macrophages inhibit T-cell proliferation by Stat6-dependent expression of PD-L2. Blood. 2010;116:3311–20. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-02-271981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.