Abstract
Phase space has been used to visualize and analyze the dynamic behavior of stochastic and chaotic systems. We applied this concept to maxi channels recorded from excised inside-out patches of in situ interstitial cells of Cajal. Pseudo-phase portraits of channel current were fairly homogeneous from patch to patch. They showed three main peaks, α, β, and γ, in increasing conductance. These represented single or near aggregated states. The α-peak was the closed state. The β-peak was small, consisting of a single conductance state, or in some cases two (a doublet). The β-peak state(s) had a long lifetime and displayed a characteristic behavior of frequent short transitions to γ but not to α. It was always preceded by a short series of α/γ-transitions. The γ-peak was the largest and consisted of a large number of conductance states with fast state transitions, sometimes to the extent of causing a diffusive-type behavior. Phase portraits allowed us to construct a provisional gating scheme for the maxi channel and suggest that further analysis of recordings in higher dimensional phase space and with related techniques may be promising.
Keywords: ion channel, maxi channel, kinetics, phase portrait
the maxi channel is frequently observed in patch-clamp recordings of interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC), the pacemaker cells of the gut (11, 33, 34, 46, 47). When patches are excised from the cell, the maxi channel often activates within a minute or two. This excision activation is a characteristic property of the channel, as is a large conductance of ∼210 pS in culture and ∼320 pS in situ (hence, the maxi in maxi channel); multiple and complex subconductance states; a bell-shaped open probability-potential relationship, peaking at 0 mV; slow inactivation at potentials away from 0 mV; a low discrimination between anions and cations; and activation by protein kinase A. These properties are shared with a class of ion channels called maxi-anion or maxi-chloride channels (36). As we found poor discrimination between cations and anions, we thought it more appropriate to name our channel simply the maxi channel (33).
It is our general aim to obtain a detailed kinetic model of the maxi channel using traditional kinetic techniques such as dwell time distributions and Hidden Markov Models. However, a first step is to obtain a low-resolution, rough grain view of its kinetics, so that two questions can be answered. First, are the maxi channels likely a homogeneous group according to their kinetics? This will determine if the maxi channels should be split into groups or if indeed a detailed model is at all suitable. Secondly, what are the likely complexities of their kinetics? This will determine the precise approach to a more detailed analysis. To gain this rough grain view we found pseudo-phase portraits to be very useful. Phase space is a central concept in nonlinear dynamics with applications in all branches of science (7, 8). The etymology of “phase space” is very much a historical contingency (31), but in outline it is a rather simple concept. A time series of n variables can be thought of as a trajectory through an n-dimensional space, a phase space. If there is only one variable, then the trajectory can be mapped onto a multidimensional space by having each dimension represent the value of the variable at a time separated from each other dimension by some lag (2, 38). This is often called pseudo-phase space. Visualization of the n dimensional phase space, or pseudo-phase space, is simple for n of two or three. The resulting graph of the trajectory is often called a phase portrait. However, for n greater than three there are methods to find the most interesting region of the space and project this onto two or three dimensions. This is called embedding, with specific methods including principle component analysis, normal mode analysis, and Poincare sections.
Here we show how two-dimensional pseudo-phase portraits of patch-clamp recordings of the maxi channel can be used to answer our two questions about its kinetics. This should provide a basis for detailed kinetic modeling.
METHODS
Patch clamp of the maxi channel.
The maxi channel was recorded from excised inside-out patches of small intestinal ICC in situ as described previously (33). All procedures were approved and carried out in accordance with regulations from the Animal Ethics Board of McMaster University. Maxi channels were identified in excised patches from voltage ramps with inactivation at negative potentials and activation at potentials near to 0 mV, as described previously (33). The same voltage-clamp protocol was used for all recordings presented and analyzed here: +20 mV for 2 s followed by a step to −40 mV for 4 s. The initial +20-mV step was required to keep the channel open at −40 mV, as the maxi channel inactivates at potentials away from 0 mV (33, 34). For each patch, this 6-s protocol was repeated 100 times (i.e., for t10 min). The pipette solution throughout consisted of 150 mM NaCl and 10 mM HEPES adjusted to pH 7.35 with Tris base [2-amino-2-(hydroxymethyl)-1,3-propanediol]. The bath solution was 95% O2-5% CO2 bubbled Krebs containing the following (mM): 120.3 NaCl, 5.9 KCl, 15.5 NaHCO3, 1.2 NaH2PO4, 0.1 citric acid, 0.1 aspartic acid, 2.5 CaCl2, 1.2 MgCl2, and 11.5 glucose.
Pseudo-phase portraits.
A pseudo-phase portrait is the graph of vx+τ(vx) where vx is the magnitude of the measured variable at time x and vx+τ is its value at some later time. This is usually plotted as a scatter of {vx+τ, vx} pairs or a connected trajectory. Due to the near instantaneous changes in conductance of an ion channel, {vx+τ, vx} pairs should cluster at spots (Fig. 1) and with a large number of pairs the density of these spots will be great. Therefore, instead of plotting the vx+τ(vx) trajectory or scatter, we plotted the log frequency of {vx+τ, vx} pairs as a two-dimensional image,
where a and b are bins of v, each bin represented by a pixel in the F(a, b) image. A similar binning of pseudo-phase space has been employed by Janssen and Nyberg (12); they just did not log the count. Unless otherwise stated bins were 0.1-pA wide. Also. we summated F(a, b) with several different values of τ. These pseudo-phase portraits are denoted as F(a, b)p,q,r... where p, q, r, etc. are lag values. These summated images produce a more populated and therefore smoother portrait. Some simple facts of interpretation of pseudo-phase portraits are illustrated in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Interpretation of pseudo-phase portraits. For a single channel with 2 states (α and β), 4 density peaks will be apparent in the pseudo-phase portrait; 2 peaks along the principle diagonal (vx = vx+τ; dotted line), representing no change in state, and 2 peaks along the counter diagonal, representing change from one state to another. Of course by “no change” and “change,” we mean only between the 2 lag separated samples, not the intermediate samples. Three independent channels, also with 2 states each, will appear as 3 stacked versions of the single channel portrait, giving the portrait a “blocky,” appearance. If the number of states per channel is increased, this blocky appearance will blur into a smear along the principle diagonal but with a width at 45° to the principle diagonal conserved, corresponding to the single channel current. This can be used to distinguish data with many channels vs. many states.
RESULTS
Pseudo-phase portraits of single maxi channels were diverse in their appearance (Fig. 2A). Most, if not all, shared two or more features of the scheme in Fig. 2C. In this scheme, there are three main peaks along the principle diagonal, α, β, and γ, in increasing conductance, with γ much larger than the others. Many portraits has just these three peaks (Fig. 2A, d, g, and h), but often there were more. In these cases, peaks were lumped into α, β, or γ by the following operational definition: β-peaks were small and associated with long transition “streaks” extending from their origin to near the maximum conductance of the channel; α-peaks were any peaks smaller in conductance than β; and γ-peaks were any peaks larger in conductance than β. The α included the closed state but was stretched along the principle diagonal to varying degrees (not circular, as would be expected for just noise), suggesting the additional presence of low conductance states. As with α, the extension of the β-peak along the principle was variable to the extent that sometimes it split into a doublet (Fig. 2A, b, f, i, j, and p). The γ was the largest peak, suggesting either a large number of near aggregate (near the same conductance) states or diffusive conductance changes (see below). In some cases, there was a partial splitting of a small lower γ conductance peak (Fig. 2A, m, o, and p). There were strong α/γ-transition peaks, less so for α/β.
Fig. 2.
Pseudo-phase portraits of single maxi channel patches. A: F(a, b)50,100,150 ms for 16 patches (a–p) containing a single maxi channel. Each portrait represents 6 min of 10-kHz sampled data recorded at −40 mV (100 steps at 3.6-s per step). Data was low-pass filtered at a 250-Hz cutoff before calculation of portraits. Bin range for all portraits is −24 to +2 pA with a bin size of 0.1 pA (note that as current is inward, conductance increases along the principle diagonal from top right to bottom left). B: average of all 16 portraits in A. Three peaks along the principle diagonal can be seen in most portraits, α, β, and γ. These are indicated in C along with the state transition areas. In many patches (b, f, i, j, and p), β is a doublet of 2 peaks. In one patch, a, there is a peak (δ) below γ.
Of course this scheme is just an attempt at generalization. In some cases, it is questionable whether the β-peak was actually present at all (Fig. 2A, k). Some maxi channels could clearly not be fit into our scheme, even at a stretch (Fig. 2A, e and f). Excluding these latter two channels we subjectively quantified the peak conductances (Table 1). Specifically, we wanted to test the hypothesis that β was a simple fraction of the total conductance, as has been shown for the maxi channel in cultured ICC (11, 34); thus the β/total conductance ratios were calculated. The β was around a quarter or a third of the full conductance of the channel depending on the method of calculation.
Table 1.
Statistics of pseudo-phase portrait peaks
| γB − α, pA | (β − α)/(γB − α), unitless | γ − α, pA | (β − α)/(γ − α), unitless | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | 16 | 26 | 16 | 26 |
| Min | 14.00 | 0.137 | 8.60 | 0.162 |
| Max | 22.40 | 0.351 | 18.60 | 0.500 |
| Mean | 17.34 | 0.262 | 12.96 | 0.357 |
| SD | 2.10 | 0.054 | 3.16 | 0.087 |
| SE | 0.52 | 0.011 | 0.79 | 0.017 |
Data are from 16 patches. Last 2 columns show n >16 because in patches with β-doublets each peak was counted. α, β, and γ, center of α-, β-, and γ-peaks along the principle diagonal; γΒ, outer bound of γ-peak along the principle diagonal.
The features of our scheme could be identified and explained from observation of current traces (Fig. 3). The large size of the γ-peak was explained by 1) a large number of quickly transitioning, near aggregate states, almost leading to the appearance of noise but with clear step like transitions (Fig. 3, hU and pU); 2) relaxations in current, likely reflecting changes in the lipid environment of the channel (3, 6) (grey arrow lines in Fig. 3, iL and pU); and 3) transitions to lower conductance levels that were so short as to be cut in apparent amplitude by the band-width of the recording apparatus (Fig. 3). The β-peak state tended to be long lived, interrupted only by a propensity of short, band-width limited β/γ-transitions (Fig. 3, hL, iL, and pL). This explains the long β/γ-transition streak in many of the pseudo-phase portraits. However, there were almost no α/β-transitions, explaining why there were generally only weak α/β-transition streaks. Another curious feature of the β-peak state was that it was always preceded by one or more α/γ-transitions before a final α/β-transition (Fig. 3, hL, iL, and pL). With pseudo-phase portraits where the γ-peak was very large, this resulted from either trains of short, band-width limited α/γ-transitions (Fig. 3, dU) or a diffusive pattern of conductance change (Fig. 3, dL). It might be possible that if the size of the γ-peak was only due to very fast, band-width limited transitions (rather than a multiplicity of near aggregate states), then changing the filtering of the data or portrait lag might resolve γ into smaller peaks. However, we found this not to be the case (Fig. 4).
Fig. 3.
Traces of single maxi channel patches. Single sweeps at −40 mV from five patches. First letter of each panel (h, i, p, a, and d) corresponds to the patch and its pseudo-phase portrait in Fig. 2. Left: whole extent of the sweep at −40 mV (3.6 s). Right: each corresponding panel is an expanded region of 100 ms (expanded region is indicated by a grey box with arrow at left). Dotted lines indicate 0 pA. For patches h, I, and p, each is shown a pair of sweeps, upper (U) and lower (L), showing α/γ and β/γ-transitions, respectively. Single sweep from a shows the γ/δ-transitions. Two sweeps from d show a train of short α/γ-transitions (U) and diffusive behavior (L). None of the data have been digitally filtered. Grey arrows indicate relaxation behavior.
Fig. 4.
Effect of lag and filtering on pseudo-phase portraits. Pseudo-phase portraits of the same patch in Fig. 2Ai, calculated with different lags (τ) and low-pass filter cut offs (Fc). For Fc = 5 kHz, the filtering was by the recording amplifier only (80 dB/decade Bessel filter). For Fc = 250 and 50 Hz, the data were additionally digitally filtered with an 8 pole Bessel filter. The same analysis of the other15 patches showed similar results; the γ-peak was not resolved into any further peaks.
A number of patches contained more than one maxi channel (Fig. 5). In some of their pseudo-phase portraits, the sojourns to subconductance states were limited enough so that the number of channels can be clearly counted as stepped blocks (Fig. 5A, e, f, i, j, and B, q). In others, however, the number of subconductances and/or extent of the γ-peak meant that the blocks smeared to varying extents into a smear along the principle diagonal (Fig. 5, compare with Fig. 1).
Fig. 5.
Pseudo-phase portraits of multi-maxi channel patches. F(a, b)50,100,150 ms for seventeen patches containing either 2 (A, a–k) or greater than 2 (B, l–q) maxi channels. Each portrait represents 6 min of 10-kHz sampled data recorded at −40 mV (100 steps at 3.6 s per step). Data was low-pass filtered at a 250-Hz cutoff before calculation of portraits. Bin size is 0.1 pA. Frequency (F) scale applies to both A and B.
DISCUSSION
Analysis of maxi channel recordings with pseudo-phase portraits has allowed us to answer our two questions. Most of the single maxi channels seemed to form a kinetically homogeneous group, with phase portraits conforming to the scheme in Fig. 2C. This together with observations of the traces (Fig. 3) allows us to construct a provisional gating scheme (Fig. 6). This scheme can be partitioned into three modes, normal, β, and β-entry. For extended periods of time, the channel stays in either the normal or β-mode. The normal mode as the name suggests is what the channels exists in most of the time. The β-mode appears to represent a voltage-dependent inactivation that occurs sometimes with the step to −40 mV from +20 mV and is always preceded by the β-entry mode. The presence in some phase portraits of a β-doublet (Fig. 2A, l and p), each peak of which contains a β/γ-streak (thereby confirming that both are indeed β-peaks), could be due to two possibilities. First, there may be two “parallel” β-modes. This is not to suggest that there are two completely different conformational states; that would be taking a too literal view of what a gating scheme represents, for it does only represent something physical. Instead there must be parts of the channel that are conformationally independent of each other, while both effecting conductance. One part causes the β-mode pattern, and the other, some much more long-lived conformation, either increases or decrease the overall conductance (causing the β-mode doublet). The second possibility is that the doublet is caused by a leak current (rather than a modulating independent conformation). This is possibly less likely as it would cause all the other peaks to double.
Fig. 6.
Provisional gating scheme for the maxi channel. A: gating scheme. Normal mode consists of α/γ-transitions. The γ-state actually represents a near aggregate of many states not distinguished in phase portraits. The β-mode consists of the β-peak and short transitions to the γ-peak (Fig. 3, hL, pL, and iL), and these transitions appear as the β/γ-transition streaks in the phase portrait (B). The γ-state in these β/γ-transitions is probably not the normal mode γ-state, as there would then be no reason why there would not be quick reentry to the normal mode (the β-mode is long lived, with many β/γ-transitions in recordings). Entry into the β-mode is via a series of α/γ and α/β-transitions. Again these must be different states to the normal mode α/γ-transitions. Usually exit from the β-mode back to the normal mode is not been seen at −40 mV, but in 1 trace it did and appeared to enter the normal mode via γ. This possible transition is indicated in grey. Single arrows are not meant to suggest irreversibility but rather indicate that the missing trajectory has a negligible rate constant compared with the marked one. This may be due to the system not being at equilibrium (it is constantly being cycled through +20/−40-mV steps).
The large size and principle extension of the γ-peak and inspection of recordings suggest that the γ-peak consists of a large number of near aggregate states. Aggregated states are those states with the same conductance (45). By near aggregated we mean a collection of states with nearly the same conductance. If there are enough of these states and there is some noise, then they will form one indistinguishable peak. What might be the possible solution to the complexity of the γ-peak states? In the traditional approach to ion channel kinetic analysis, aggregated states are distinguished by plotting the distribution of dwell times in the aggregate conductance (26, 41). Each state should contribute a single exponential to the dwell time distribution with a time constant proportional to the microscopic rate constant(s) of escape from that state. In this way the number of states can be found. Of course as the number of states goes up, their exponents become indistinguishable, usually forming a power-law distribution. Some information can still be gained from such a distribution, although not of the detail as obtained from exponentials (9, 29, 32, 37, 40, 44). Both the exponential and power-law distribution approaches have been applied to properly aggregated states (i.e., a single open or closed conductance). However, in the case of the γ-peak the states are near aggregated. This fact may open an avenue to its kinetic analysis using pseudo-phase space, as follows.
The pseudo-phase portrait is a two-dimensional space where each point is the value of the time series at time x and time x + τ. This can be extended to the concept of an n-dimensional pseudo-phase space where each point is the value of the time series at time x, time x + τ, time x +2τ,....x + (n − 1)τ. As n increases more of the local trajectory will be described by the position of a single point and so more near aggregated states should be distinguished as point clusters as they will tend to have different local trajectories. Of course the crunch comes when trying to visualize this n-dimensional space and identify clusters, but there are several established methods to do this coming under the rubric of “embedding” or “embedology” (38). Phase space and embedding have been applied to molecular dynamics simulations of proteins (2, 13, 15, 30, 35, 39, 43), but as far as we know they have not been applied to a recording of a physical molecule. By distinguishing near aggregated states, they could be useful for the maxi channel.
Komatsuzaki and colleagues (16) developed a theory similar to phase space called the “multiscale state space network.” Like phase space its abstraction and distance from more traditional modes of analysis could be a deterrent. However, they have also developed a related concept called “local equilibrium states” (LES) that is more relatable to traditional approaches of single channel analysis (1). In traditional analysis, all the samples in a time series are binned in a single amplitude histogram and the bumps in that histogram are used to distinguish observable states (mixture modeling). In the LES approach, distributions are calculated for small segments of the time series instead and these distributions clustered by statistical similarity to discover LES. It can be seen that the LES approach is related to phase space, with the length of the LES segment equivalent to the dimensionality of the phase space. The major difference is that LES does not take into account the time order of samples, whereas phase space does.
Clustering of trajectories in phase space should allow the separation (segmentation in time) and identification of near aggregated states such as constitute the γ-peak. Once this is done more traditional methods can then be applied, such as dwell time analysis and Hidden Markov Modeling. Pseudo-phase space probably cannot be used to replace these traditional methods, as although rough guesses of transition rates (Fig. 6B) can be made from the intensity of transition peaks, these will only ever be rough guesses due to the fact of the lag used in construction of the space and that a single transition peak can be aggregated (represent more than one conformational transition). Phase space should be seen as one extra tool for kinetic analysis, not an alternative to those already established.
Summary.
Liebovitch and colleagues (5, 17–25, 42) have been proponents of the application of fractals and other aspects of chaos theory and nonlinear dynamics to ion channels. This advocacy proved rather controversial for some in the traditional Markovian camp (see 4, 10, 14, 19, 27, 28, 37). As the interest of Liebovitch and colleagues (23, 24) has been in chaos theory, they have employed pseudo-phase portraits in at least some of their work on ion channels. A pseudo-phase portrait has also been made of the locust muscle BK channel by Usherwood and colleagues (5). We have shown here using pseudo-phase portraits that there is a degree of homogeneity in the kinetics of maxi channels so that a partial gating scheme could be constructed. It should be possible to further refine and expand this scheme with phase space and related methods that can handle the many near aggregated states in the maxi channel. However, this can only be as a complement to traditional kinetic techniques, it cannot replace them, as such the gating scheme we present is only provisional (“rough grain” as we say in the Introduction). Also, the gating scheme corresponds to only one set of experimental conditions, voltage protocol, ionic conditions, etc. Under different conditions (such as changing permeant ions), different trajectories will occur at different rates and these will be a subject of future studies.
GRANTS
This work was supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Operating Grant MOP12874 and Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Discovery Grant 386877.
DISCLOSURES
No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the author(s).
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Author contributions: S.P.P. conception and design of research; S.P.P. performed experiments; S.P.P. analyzed data; S.P.P. interpreted results of experiments; S.P.P. prepared figures; S.P.P. drafted manuscript; S.P.P. and J.D.H. edited and revised manuscript; S.P.P. and J.D.H. approved final version of manuscript.
REFERENCES
- 1. Baba A, Komatsuzaki T. Construction of effective free energy landscape from single-molecule time series. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 19297–19302, 2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Caves LSD, Verma CS. Congruent qualitative behavior of complete and reconstructed phase space trajectories from biomolecular dynamics simulation. Proteins 47: 25–30, 2002 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Chui JK, Fyles TM. Ionic conductance of synthetic channels: analysis, lessons, and recommendations. Chem Soc Rev 41: 148–175, 2012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Colquhoun D, Hawkes AG. The principles of the stochastic interpretation of ion-channel mechanisms. In: Single-Channel Recording, edited by Sakmann B, Neher E. New York: Plenum, 1995 [Google Scholar]
- 5. Fulinski A, Grzywna Z, Mellor I, Siwy Z, Usherwood PN. Non-Markovian character of ionic current fluctuations in membrane channels. Phys Rev E 58: 919–924, 1998 [Google Scholar]
- 6. Fyles TM, Loock D, Zhou X. Ion channels based on bis-macrocyclic bolaamphiphiles: effects of hydrophobic substitutions. Can J Chem 76: 1015–1026, 1998 [Google Scholar]
- 7. Glass L, Mackey MC. From Clocks to Chaos: the Rhythms of Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press, 1988 [Google Scholar]
- 8. Gleick J. Chaos: Making a New Science. New York: Viking, 1987 [Google Scholar]
- 9. Goychuk I, Hanggi P. Ion channel gating: a first-passage time analysis of the Kramers type. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 3552–3556, 2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Horn R, Korn SJ. Model selection: reliability and bias. Biophys J 55: 379–381, 1989 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Huizinga JD, Zhu Y, Ye J, Molleman A. High-conductance chloride channels generate pacemaker currents in interstitial cells of Cajal. Gastroenterology 123: 1627–1636, 2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Jansen BH, Nyberg HN. Measuring the similarity between trajectories using clustering techniques. Chaos 3: 1993 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kitao A, Go N. Investigating protein dynamics in collective coordinate space. Curr Opin Struct Biol 9: 164–169, 1999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Korn SJ, Horn R. Statistical discrimination of fractal and Markov models of single-channel gating. Biophys J 54: 871–877, 1988 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Levitt M. Molecular-dynamics of native protein. 2 Analysis and nature of motion. J Mol Biol 168: 621–657, 1983 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Li CB, Yang H, Komatsuzaki T. Multiscale complex network of protein conformational fluctuations in single-molecule time series. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 536–541, 2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Liebovitch LS. Analysis of fractal ion channel gating kinetics: kinetic rates, energy levels, and activation energies. Math Biosci 93: 97–115, 1989 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Liebovitch LS. The fractal random telegraph signal: signal analysis and applications. Ann Biomed Eng 16: 483–494, 1988 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Liebovitch LS. Testing fractal and Markov models of ion channel kinetics. Biophys J 55: 373–377, 1989 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Liebovitch LS, Fischbarg J, Koniarek JP, Todorova I, Wang M. Fractal model of ion-channel kinetics. Biochim Biophys Acta 896: 173–180, 1987 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Liebovitch LS, Sullivan JM. Fractal analysis of a voltage-dependent potassium channel from cultured mouse hippocampal neurons. Biophys J 52: 979–988, 1987 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Liebovitch LS, Todorov AT. Using fractals and nonlinear dynamics to determine the physical properties of ion channel proteins. Crit Rev Neurobiol 10: 169–187, 1996 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Liebovitch LS, Toth TI. Fractal activity in cell membrane ion channels. Ann NY Acad Sci 591: 375–391, 1990 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Liebovitch LS, Toth TI. A model of ion channel kinetics using deterministic chaotic rather than stochastic processes. J Theor Biol 148: 243–267, 1991 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Lowen SB, Teich MC. Fractal renewal processes generate 1/F noise. Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics 47: 992–1001, 1993 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. McManus OB, Blatz AL, Magleby KL. Sampling, log binning, fitting, and plotting durations of open and shut intervals from single channels and the effects of noise. Pflügers Arch 410: 530–553, 1987 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. McManus OB, Spivak CE, Blatz AL, Weiss DS, Magleby KL. Fractal models, Markov models, and channel kinetics. Biophys J 55: 383–385, 1989 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. McManus OB, Weiss DS, Spivak CE, Blatz AL, Magleby KL. Fractal models are inadequate for the kinetics of four different ion channels. Biophys J 54: 859–870, 1988 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Millhauser GL, Salpeter EE, Oswald RE. Diffusion models of ion-channel gating and the origin of power-law distributions from single-channel recording. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 1503–1507, 1988 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Noguti T, Go N. Structural basis of hierarchical multiple substates of a protein. 3. Side-chain and main chain local conformations. Proteins 5: 113–124, 1989 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Nolte DD. The tangled tale of phase space. Physics Today 63: 33–38, 2010 [Google Scholar]
- 32. Oswald RE, Millhauser GL, Carter AA. Diffusion model in ion channel gating. Extension to agonist-activated ion channels. Biophys J 59: 1136–1142, 1991 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Parsons SP, Kunze WA, Huizinga JD. Maxi-channels recorded in situ from ICC and pericytes associated with the mouse myenteric plexus. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 302: C1055–C1069, 2012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Parsons SP, Sanders KM. An outwardly rectifying and deactivating chloride channel expressed by interstitial cells of cajal from the murine small intestine. J Membr Biol 221: 123–132, 2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Phillips JL, Colvin ME, Newsam S. Validating clustering of molecular dynamics simulations using polymer models. BMC Bioinformatics 12: 2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Sabirov RZ, Okada Y. The maxi-anion channel: a classical channel playing novel roles through an unidentified molecular entity. J Physiol Sci 59: 3–21, 2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Sansom MS, Ball FG, Kerry CJ, McGee R, Ramsey RL, Usherwood PN. Markov, fractal, diffusion, and related models of ion channel gating. A comparison with experimental data from two ion channels. Biophys J 56: 1229–1243, 1989 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Schreiber T. Interdisciplinary application of nonlinear time series methods. Phys Rep 308: 2–64, 1999 [Google Scholar]
- 39. Shao JY, Tanner SW, Thompson N, Cheatham TE. Clustering molecular dynamics trajectories. 1. Characterizing the performance of different clustering algorithms. J Chem Theory Comput 3: 2312–2334, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Sigg D, Qian H, Bezanilla F. Kramers' diffusion theory applied to gating kinetics of voltage-dependent ion channels. Biophys J 76: 782–803, 1999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Sigworth FJ, Sine SM. Data transformations for improved display and fitting of single-channel dwell time histograms. Biophys J 52: 1047–1054, 1987 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Timmer J, Klein S. Testing the Markov condition in ion channel recordings. Phys Rev E 55: 3306–3311, 1997 [Google Scholar]
- 43. Torda AE, Vangunsteren WF. Algorithms for Clustering Molecular-Dynamics Configurations. J Comput Chem 15: 1331–1340, 1994 [Google Scholar]
- 44. Vaccaro SR. Nonlinear drift-diffusion model of gating in the fast Cl channel. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 76: 011923, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Venkataramanan L, Sigworth FJ. Applying hidden Markov models to the analysis of single ion channel activity. Biophys J 82: 1930–1942, 2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Wright GW, Parsons SP, Huizinga JD. Ca2+ sensitivity of the maxi chloride channel in interstitial cells of Cajal. Neurogastroenterol Motil 24: e221–234, 2012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Zhu Y, Mucci A, Huizinga JD. Inwardly rectifying chloride channel activity in intestinal pacemaker cells. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 288: G809–G821, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]






