Abstract
Although it varies from center to center, the frequency of temporal artery biopsy in patients suspected of having temporal arteritis (TA) is relatively small. Most commonly, patients suspected of having TA are placed on prednisone for varying periods of time, and if symptoms disappear or lessen the diagnosis is made. During a recent 13-year period at Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas, 15 patients with TA had the diagnosis of TA confirmed by histological examination of a biopsy of one temporal artery. The length of the biopsied artery varied from 0.7 to 5.5 cm (mean 2.7). The 15 patients ranged in age from 68 to 94 years (mean 82, median 85), and 11 (73%) were women. In 13 of the 15 patients (87%), the lumen of the temporal artery was narrowed >95% in cross-sectional area by the panarteritis, and the temporal artery was associated with giant cells in 11 patients (73%). Large collections of erythrocytes were present in the inflamed arterial walls in 5 patients (33%). All 15 patients were treated with varying doses of prednisone with favorable response in each. Eight patients (53%) died from 1 to 105 months (mean 52, median 57) after biopsy of the temporal artery. We have neither positive nor negative evidence that the TA played a role in the patients’ death. Despite the present study and numerous others in the last 70 years, the cause of TA remains a mystery.
In 1932 and in 1934, Bayard T. Horton, a vascular specialist at the Mayo Clinic, and others (1, 2) reported two patients with headache, scalp tenderness, weight loss, fever, and night sweats, and histologic examination of one biopsied temporal artery disclosed granulomatous panarteritis. Thereafter, the condition was called temporal arteritis (TA) by some and Horton's disease by others. In 1937, Horton and Magath (3) described visual loss, jaw claudication, and elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rates in several additional patients with the disease. According to Boes (4), Horton in 1942 was the first to give a patient with TA Kendall's adrenocorticoid extract (nonpure), but apparently it had no effect on the patient's disease. Shick and colleagues (5), in 1950, also at the Mayo Clinic, reported clinical improvement in two patients with TA using a pure form of cortisone. The present study summarizes findings in 15 patients with TA seen at Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas (BUMC) in the last 13 years and describes in detail the various histological features in the temporal artery in these patients.
METHODS
Cases coded as TA by the surgical pathology division of the Department of Pathology of BUMC from 1997 through 2012 were retrieved. Fifteen such cases having biopsy of one temporal artery were found. The paraffin blocks of the temporal artery in each patient were retrieved and recut. The resulting 6-micron-thick sections were stained by both the hematoxylin-eosin method and by the Movat method, and the sections were examined. The clinical records in each patient were retrieved and examined in the BUMC record room, and pertinent findings were tabulated in each patient. Finally, the Social Security Death Index was searched to determine how many of the 15 patients had died.
RESULTS
Pertinent findings in the 15 patients are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. The 15 patients ranged in age from 68 to 94 years (mean 82) at the time of the temporal artery biopsy; 11 were women and 4 were men. The age at biopsy in all 15 patients corresponded to the age at which symptoms and/or signs of TA appeared. The symptoms at the time of temporal artery biopsy are displayed for each patient in Table 1: headache in 12, visual disturbance in 10, mastication pain in 7, and temporal artery tenderness in 6. At the time of biopsy, the indirect systemic arterial pressure was ≥140 mm Hg systolic and/or ≥90 mm Hg diastolic in 11 patients (73%). The body mass index was >25 kg/m2 in 8 of the 15 patients, but in none was it ≥30 kg/m2. Anemia (hematocrit <35%) was present in 8 (57%) of the 14 patients in which the result of this test was available. The platelet count was >250 mm3 in 9 of the 11 patients in whom it was performed. The erythrocyte sedimentation rates were elevated (>20 mm/hour) in all 10 patients where the results were available. The serum C-reactive protein was elevated in all 5 patients in which it was done. One patient (#2) had an aortic aneurysm, and one patient (#8) had had a stroke a few months before biopsy. The length of the temporal artery biopsied ranged from 0.7 to 5.5 cm (mean 2.7); sample images and descriptions appear in Figures 1 to 9. In 13 of the 15 patients (87%), the lumen of the temporal artery was narrowed >95% in cross-sectional area. The temporal artery was associated with giant cells in 11 patients (73%). All 15 patients received prednisone (maximal dose 40–70 mg) for 0.25 to 73 months (mean 22), and all had symptomatic improvement, including 5 with loss or virtual loss of symptoms.
Table 1.
Clinical and laboratory findings in the 15 patients with temporal arteritis confirmed by biopsy and treated with prednisone
| Symptoms at time of biopsy | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient | Date of biopsy | Age at biopsy (years) | Sex | Interval from biopsy to death (mo) | Age at death (yr) | Age at symptom onset (yr) | H | MP | VD | CS | PR | LC | Temporal artery tenderness | BP s/d (mm Hg) | Hgb (g/dL) | HCT (%) | Platelet count (mm3) | ESR (mm/hr) | CRP (mg/dL) | BMI (kg/m2) | Minimal time on prednisone (mo) | Maximal dose of prednisone (mg) |
| 1 | 8/6/1998 | 75 | F | − | − | 75 | + | + | + | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 130/80 | 11.7 | 35.2 | – | − | 20.8 | 73 | 70 | |
| 2 | 8/3/2001 | 75 | F | 50 | 79 | 75 | + | + | + | + | 0 | + | + | 170/75 | 8.5 | 26.9 | 331 | − | − | 20.0 | 26 | 60 |
| 3 | 6/25/1997 | 77 | F | − | − | 77 | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 140/80 | 11.5 | 37.0 | 76 | − | 27.1 | − | 60 | |
| 4 | 10/23/2001 | 77 | F | 105 | 85 | 77 | + | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 180/90 | 13.3 | 40.1 | 470 | − | − | 26.2 | 17 | 40 |
| 5 | 11/21/2002 | 80 | F | 65 | 85 | 80 | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | 130/60 | 10.5 | 32.0 | 347 | 121 | − | 24.6 | − | 60 |
| 6 | 1/29/2002 | 82 | F | 87 | 90 | 82 | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 130/90 | 12.4 | 38.2 | 379 | − | − | 23.0 | 73 | 60 |
| 7 | 3/22/2001 | 85 | F | 1 | 85 | 85 | + | + | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | 140/80 | 10.6 | 32.2 | 245 | 92 | 26 | 24.3 | 0.5 | 60 |
| 8 | 11/22/2010 | 86 | F | − | − | 86 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 150/55 | 12.1 | 35.8 | 230 | ↑ | ↑ | 26.0 | 0.25 | 60 |
| 9 | 3/26/2002 | 86 | F | − | − | 86 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 140/60 | 11.2 | 33.5 | 269 | ↑ | − | 20.8 | 11 | 60 |
| 10 | 9/8/2004 | 89 | F | 74 | 96 | 89 | + | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 220/80 | 9.8 | 29.9 | 565 | 130 | 28 | 29.1 | 14 | 60 |
| 11 | 2/10/2000 | 90 | F | 28 | 92 | 90 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 175/80 | 13.6 | 32.4 | ↑ | − | 21.8 | 24 | 60 | |
| 12 | 9/9/2010 | 68 | M | 3 | 68 | 68 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 110/70 | 11.0 | 32.0 | 258 | 57 | − | 25.1 | 4 | 60 |
| 13 | 4/25/1998 | 81 | M | − | − | 81 | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | + | 155/95 | − | − | − | − | − | 29.8 | − | 60 |
| 14 | 8/22/2008 | 83 | M | − | − | 83 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 115/70 | 9.9 | 29.5 | 369 | 103 | 19 | 25.4 | 3 | 50 |
| 15 | 4/13/2009 | 94 | M | − | − | 94 | + | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | 160/90 | 14.3 | 40.0 | 281 | 41 | 6 | 26.2 | 19 | 60 |
BMI indicates body mass index; BP, blood pressure; CRP, C-reactive protein; CS, cigarette smokers; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; H, headache; HCT, hematocrit; Hgb, hemoglobin; LC, leg claudication; MP, mastication pain; PR, polymyalgia rheumatica; S/D, peak systole/end diastole; VD, visual disturbance; –, not done, not applicable, or no information.
Table 2.
Morphological findings in the 15 patients with biopsy-proven temporal arteritis
| Patient | Length (cm) of excised TA | Number of histological cross-sections | Maximal diameter (mm) of cross-sections | Cross-sectional narrowing | Collection of red blood cells in intima | Lymphocytes | Giant cells |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.2 | 8 | 3 | >95% | 0 | +++ | ++ |
| 2 | 4.7 | 11 | 2 | >95% | + | +++ | ++ |
| 3 | 2.4 | 8 | 2 | >95% | 0 | +++ | ++ |
| 4 | 2.0 | 8 | 2 | >95% | + | +++ | ++ |
| 5 | 2.4 | 12 | 2 | >95% | + | +++ | ++ |
| 6 | 0.7 | 3 | 2 | >95% | 0 | + | 0 |
| 7 | 2.6 | 8 | 2 | 51%–75% | + | + | 0 |
| 8 | 2.2 | 4 | 2 | >95% | 0 | +++ | ++ |
| 9 | 5.5 | 19 | 6 | >95% | 0 | +++ | ++ |
| 10 | 3.0 | 8 | 4 | >95% | 0 | +++ | + |
| 11 | 0.7 | 2 | 2 | >95% | 0 | + | + |
| 12 | 1.9 | 4 | 2 | >95% | + | +++ | ++ |
| 13 | 2.1 | 6 | 3 | >95% | 0 | +++ | ++ |
| 14 | 3.5 | 7 | 4 | >95% | 0 | +++ | 0 |
| 15 | 3.0 | 7 | 3 | 51%–75% | 0 | +++ | 0 |
TA indicates temporal arteritis.
Figure 1.

Patient 1. Various views of the temporal artery. (a) Movat-stained section (×40) showing relatively intact media (pink), very thickened intima (green) with severe luminal narrowing, and severely thickened fibrous tissue of the adventitia (tan). (b) Hematoxylin-eosin (H&E)–stained section showing numerous inflammatory cells involving the outer intima, media, and inner adventitia (×100). (c) A close-up showing intimal granulomatous-type cells adjacent to the media with penetration of the media (H&E, ×400). (d) Another view showing an inflamed nodule in brackets in the adventitia (H&E, ×40). (e) A close-up of that nodule (H&E, ×400).
Figure 9.

Patient 13. (a) A Movat-stained section of the temporal artery (×40) with severe luminal narrowing. The lumen in all sections in temporal arteritis tends to be in the more central portion of the artery and not on the periphery, as it is in typical atherosclerosis. (b) A close-up hematoxylin-eosin–stained section (×400) shows several giant cells in the outer intima adjacent to the media. These cells are lined up perpendicular to the smooth muscle cells in the media.
DISCUSSION
It might seem a bit inappropriate in 2013 to report a series of only 15 patients with biopsy-proven TA when others have reported such large series of patients with biopsy-proven TA (6–35). Gonzalez-Gay and colleagues (13, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 31), for example, in 7 articles from 1998 to 2011 described anywhere from 161 to 255 patients with biopsy-proven TA (called “giant cell arteritis” by the authors), but none contained a photomicrograph of a temporal artery. Indeed, of the 30 studies presented in Table 3 (6–35), only two included a photomicrograph of a temporal artery, and in both only hematoxylin-eosin–stained sections had been used. It is not possible to demonstrate the locations of the panarteritis, i.e., how much of the process involved the intima, media, and adventitia, without an elastic tissue stain that readily identifies the internal and external elastic membranes allowing clear demonstration of media, thus separating it from the intima and adventitia. We employed the Movat stain for this purpose in our study (36).
Table 3.
Reported studies of patients with temporal arteritis confirmed by biopsy of the temporal artery
| First author, year of publication | Patients(n) | Biopsyproven TA (n) | M/F | Age range (mean) | Length of study (yr) | Follow-up (yr) | Deaths (n) | Deaths attributed to TA | Mean ESR values (mm/hr) | Median hemo globin values (g/dl) | Median platelet count (mm3) | Visual loss (n) | Received cortico steroids (n) | Maximallength of treatment (mo) | Patients that relapsed (n) | Temporalartery photo mics | Giant cell histology (n) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Birkhead, 1957 | 55 | 55 | 28/27 | 60–83 | 6 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 21 | 55 | 15 | – | 0 | – |
| Huston, 1978 | 42 | 38 | 9/33 | 56–92 (75) | 25 | 19 | 21 | 1 | 96 | 11.5 | – | 17 | 42 | 77 | 11 | 0 | – |
| Graham, 1981 | 90 | 90 | 26/64 | 55–88 | 10 | 11 | 32 | 3 | 81 | – | – | 55 | 90 | 84 | 18 | 0 | – |
| Nordborg, 1989 | 284 | 284 | – | – | 10 | 1 | 82 | 7 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0 | – |
| Achkar, 1994 | 535 | 175 | 190/345 | 31–93 (71.7) | 3 | – | – | – | 63 | – | – | – | 249 | – | – | 0 | – |
| Lie, 1995 | 72 | 67 | 21/51 | 54–96 (69) | 25 | – | – | – | 96 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0 | – |
| Salvarani, 1995 | 125 | 115 | 22/103 | 50–80+ | 42 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0 | – |
| Gonzalez-Gay, 1998 | 239 | 239 | 106/133 | 50+ (73.5) | 21 | – | – | – | 94 | – | – | 64 | 239 | – | – | 0 | – |
| Cid, 1998 | 200 | 200 | 59/141 | 57–92 (74.5) | 16 | – | – | – | 82.7 | 12.2 | 337,000 | 28 | – | – | – | 0 | – |
| Duhaut, 1998 | 400 | 207 | 118/282 | 50+ (74) | 6 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0 | – |
| Duhaut, 1999 | 292 | 207 | 50/157 | 50+ (74.5) | 6 | 36 | 38 | 1 | 88 | 15.6 | 424,000 | 20 | 292 | 36 | – | 0 | – |
| Brack, 1999 | 148 | 74 | 16/58 | 50+ (72) | 36 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 18 | 74 | – | – | 0 | – |
| Boyev, 1999 | 756 | 722 | – | – | 28 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0 | – |
| Gonzalez-Gay, 2000 | 190 | 161 | 79/82 | 50–80+ (75) | 18 | – | – | – | 93 | 11.8 | 412,816 | 42 | – | – | – | 0 | – |
| Gonzalez-Gay, 2001 | 190 | 161 | 79/82 | 50–80+ (75) | 18 | – | – | – | 93 | 11.8 | 412,816 | – | – | – | – | 0 | – |
| Liozon, 2001 | 174 | 147 | 38/109 | – (75) | 22 | – | – | – | 90 | 11.3 | 419,000 | 58 | 174 | – | – | 0 | – |
| Ray-Chaudhur, 2002 | 11 | 9 | 3/8 | 65–90 (75) | – | – | – | – | 66 | – | – | 5 | 11 | 1.5 | – | 0 | 7 |
| Hall, 2003 | 181 | 74 | – | – | 11 | 2 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0 | – |
| Salvarani, 2004 | 173 | 151 | 36/137 | 50–80+ | 50 | 6.8 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0 | – |
| Gonzalez-Gay, 2005 | 240 | 240 | 110/130 | 50–80+ (74) | 23 | – | – | – | 93 | 11.7 | 397,000 | 21 | – | – | – | 0 | – |
| Larsson, 2006 | 49 | 49 | 0/49 | 50–69 (64.1) | 9 | 3 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0 | – |
| Gonzalez-Gay, 2007 | 255 | 255 | 116/139 | 55–94 (75) | 25 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 89 | – | – | – | 0 | – |
| Narvaez, 2007 | 78 | 57 | 28/50 | 56–89 (74.6) | 18 | – | – | – | 94.4 | 11.4 | 340,000 | 16 | 78 | 1 | – | 0 | – |
| Makkuni, 2008 | 30 | 30 | 10/20 | – (77.5) | 6 | – | – | – | 78.5 | – | – | 12 | – | – | – | + | – |
| Gonzalez-Gay, 2009 | 287 | 287 | 132/155 | 50–80+ | 27 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 138 | – | – | – | 0 | – |
| Zhou, 2009 | 107 | 26 | – | – | 19 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | 26 |
| Martinez-Lado, 2011 | 207 | 174 | 80/94 | (74.2) | 14 | 3.5 | 0 | 0 | 92.7 | 11.7 | 392,000 | 36 | 174 | 44.1 | 71 | 0 | – |
| Walvick, 2011 | 3001 | 459 | – | – | 9 | – | – | – | 81 | – | 391,000 | – | – | – | – | 0 | – |
| Ninan, 2011 | 225 | 225 | 62/163 | (78.2) | 14 | 5.5 | 71 | 12 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0 | – |
ESR indicates erythrocyte sedimentation rate; F, female; M, male; TA, temporal arteritis; −, no information.
We prefer the phrase “temporal arteritis” to the phrase “giant cell arteritis” because giant cells are not seen in all TA patients having biopsies of the temporal arteries. Among our 15 patients, we found giant cells in only 11. Mahr and colleagues (37) suggested that finding giant cells in patients with TA is determined in part by the lengths of the temporal arteries examined. These authors examined surgical reports of temporal artery biopsies in 223 patients with TA and found that 164 (74%) of the reports mentioned the presence of giant cells. These authors also mentioned that a temporal artery length of at least 0.5 cm was sufficient for diagnosis of TA. Our smallest length among the patients was 0.7 cm. Among the four patients in whom we did not see giant cells, the lengths of the temporal artery biopsied were 0.7, 2.6, 3.0, and 3.5 cm; the latter three lengths were among the longest in the patients we studied.
Although the present study focuses on the histologic features of TA, one might reasonably ask if biopsy of this artery is a useful routine endeavor. A near universal observation in TA is a rapid, sometimes dramatic, diminution or loss of symptoms after corticosteroid therapy has been initiated. If there is not a quick symptomatic response, biopsy can then be performed. There appears to be little change in the histologic features of the TA before corticosteroid therapy and up to about 6 weeks after initiation of therapy (10). A report by Guevara et al described a positive biopsy after 6 months of prednisone treatment (38). If a patient with suspected TA has a negative biopsy of the temporal artery, is it useful then to biopsy the contralateral temporal artery? According to a study by Boyev and colleagues (18), biopsy of one temporal artery in a patient with TA provides a 97% chance that the same findings would be present in the contralateral temporal artery, so that the additional biopsy would rarely be useful diagnostically.
On occasion, TA resolves without corticosteroid therapy. Horton et al, in their original two patients, described temporary remissions with relapses (1), and they later described seven additional patients in whom remission occurred without drug therapy months after diagnosis (3). Patients have been described where headaches and local symptoms have disappeared simply by removal of a portion of the temporal artery for diagnostic purposes (39, 40).
Figure 2.

Patient 2. (a) A Movat-stained section (×100) of temporal artery with severely narrowed lumen (within the green portion) of the intima with blood (red) within the intimal plaque and marked disruption of the internal elastic membrane (black). The adventitia is thickened by dense fibrous tissue (tan). (b) The same section stained by hematoxylin-eosin (×100). (c) A close up of a portion of the media showing numerous mononuclear cells (×400).
Figure 3.

Patient 4. Movat-stained section (×40) of the temporal artery showing near-total occlusion of the lumen, blood (red) within the intimal plaque, disruption of the internal elastic membrane (black), and severely thickened adventitia by dense fibrous tissue (tan). The absence of much lumen and the marked thickening of the adventitia by dense fibrous tissue makes these arteries, by external palpation, quite firm and nodular.
Figure 4.

Patient 6. Two views of Movat-stained sections of the temporal artery showing (a) virtual occlusion (×100) and (b) severe narrowing (×100). The internal elastic membrane (black) is interrupted and the quantity of fibrous tissue in the adventitia is considerably less than in previously illustrated cases.
Figure 5.

Patient 8. (a) A Movat-stained section of the temporal artery showing near occlusion of the lumen by fibrous tissue and mucopolysaccharide material (green) and dense fibrous tissue causing considerable thickening of the adventitia. (b) Hematoxylin-eosin stain (×40) of another section of the same artery showing numerous inflammatory cells between the 8:00 and 11:00 positions. (c) Close-up (×400) of a portion of the inflammatory cells.
Figure 6.

Patient 9. (a) View of a hematoxylin-eosin–stained section (×20) of the temporal artery with virtual total occlusion of its lumen. The darkened area represents collections of inflammatory cells. The adventitia is thickened by fibrous tissue. (b) A close-up (×400) of a minute portion of the inflammatory infiltrates. Granulomatous-type cells and a giant cell are visible.
Figure 7.

Patient 9. (a) A Movat-stained section (×40) of three branches of a temporal artery with narrowing of each branch, marked disruption of the media in two of the branches, and dense fibrous tissue in the adventitia. (b) A close-up of a hematoxylin-eosin–stained section (×400) of a portion of the inflammatory cells in the media. (c) Another hematoxylin-eosin stained section (×400) showing giant cells among the collection of cells.
Figure 8.

Patient 10. A Movat-stained section of the temporal artery showing (a) severe narrowing of the lumen (×100) and (b) less narrowing (×100). The amount of adventitial fibrous tissue is considerable. Inflammatory cells are present in the intima, media, and adventitia. The dark staining in the medial wall in part b represents calcific deposits.
References
- 1.Horton BT, Magath TB, Brown GE. An undescribed form of arteritis of the temporal vessels. Proc Staff Meet Mayo Clinic. 1932;7:700–701. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Horton BT, Magath TB, Brown GE. Arteritis of the temporal vessels: a previously undescribed form. Arch Intern Med. 1934;53:400–409. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Horton BT, Magath TB. Arteritis of the temporal vessels: report of seven cases. Proc Staff Meet Mayo Clinic. 1937;12:548–553. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Boes CJ. Bayard Horton's clinicopathological description of giant cell (temporal) arteritis. Cephalalgia. 2007;27(1):68–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01238.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shick RM, Baggenstoss AH, Fuller BF, Polley HF. Effects of cortisone and ACTH on periarteritis nodosa and cranial arteritis. Proc Staff Meet Mayo Clin. 1950;25(17):492–494. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Birkhead NC, Wagener HP, Shick RM. Treatment of temporal arteritis with adrenal corticosteroids; results in fifty-five cases in which lesion was proved at biopsy. J Am Med Assoc. 1957;163(10):821–827. doi: 10.1001/jama.1957.02970450023007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Huston KA, Hunder GG, Lie JT, Kennedy RH, Elveback LR. Temporal arteritis: a 25-year epidemiologic, clinical, and pathologic study. Ann Intern Med. 1978;88(2):162–167. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-88-2-162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Graham E, Holland A, Avery A, Russell RW. Prognosis in giant-cell arteritis. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1981;282(6260):269–271. doi: 10.1136/bmj.282.6260.269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nordborg E, Bengtsson BA. Death rates and causes of death in 284 consecutive patients with giant cell arteritis confirmed by biopsy. BMJ. 1989;299(6698):549–550. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6698.549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Achkar AA, Lie JT, Hunder GG, O’Fallon WM, Gabriel SE. How does previous corticosteroid treatment affect the biopsy findings in giant cell (temporal) arteritis? Ann Intern Med. 1994;120(12):987–992. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-120-12-199406150-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lie JT. Aortic and extracranial large vessel giant cell arteritis: a review of 72 cases with histopathologic documentation. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1995;24(6):422–431. doi: 10.1016/s0049-0172(95)80010-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Salvarani C, Gabriel SE, O’Fallon WM, Hunder GG. The incidence of giant cell arteritis in Olmsted County, Minnesota: apparent fluctuations in a cyclic pattern. Ann Intern Med. 1995;123(3):192–194. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-123-3-199508010-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.González-Gay MA, Blanco R, Rodríguez-Valverde V, Martínez-Taboada VM, Delgado-Rodriguez M, Figueroa M, Uriarte E. Permanent visual loss and cerebrovascular accidents in giant cell arteritis: predictors and response to treatment. Arthritis Rheum. 1998;41(8):1497–1504. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199808)41:8<1497::AID-ART22>3.0.CO;2-Z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cid MC, Font C, Oristrell J, de la Sierra A, Coll-Vinent B, López-Soto A, Vilaseca J, Urbano-Márquez A, Grau JM. Association between strong inflammatory response and low risk of developing visual loss and other cranial ischemic complications in giant cell (temporal) arteritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1998;41(1):26–32. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199801)41:1<26::AID-ART4>3.0.CO;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Duhaut P, Pinede L, Demolombe-Rague S, Loire R, Seydoux D, Ninet J, Pasquier J. Groupe de Recherche sur l’Artérite à Cellules Géantes. Giant cell arteritis and cardiovascular risk factors: a multicenter, prospective case-control study. Arthritis Rheum. 1998;41(11):1960–1965. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199811)41:11<1960::AID-ART10>3.0.CO;2-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Duhaut P, Pinède L, Bornet H, Demolombe-Ragué S, Dumontet C, Ninet J, Loire R, Pasquier J Groupe de Recherche sur l’Artérite à Cellules Géantes. Biopsy proven and biopsy negative temporal arteritis: differences in clinical spectrum at the onset of the disease. Ann Rheum Dis. 1999;58(6):335–341. doi: 10.1136/ard.58.6.335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Brack A, Martinez-Taboada V, Stanson A, Goronzy JJ, Weyand CM. Disease pattern in cranial and large-vessel giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42(2):311–317. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199902)42:2<311::AID-ANR14>3.0.CO;2-F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Boyev LR, Miller NR, Green WR. Efficacy of unilateral versus bilateral temporal artery biopsies for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;128(2):211–215. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(99)00101-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.González-Gay MA, García-Porrúa C, Llorca J, Hajeer AH, Brañas F, Dababneh A, González-Louzao C, Rodriguez-Gil E, Rodríguez-Ledo P, Ollier WE. Visual manifestations of giant cell arteritis. Trends and clinical spectrum in 161 patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 2000;79(5):283–292. doi: 10.1097/00005792-200009000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.González-Gay MA, Garcia-Porrua C, Rivas MJ, Rodriguez-Ledo P, Llorca J. Epidemiology of biopsy proven giant cell arteritis in northwestern Spain: trend over an 18 year period. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001;60(4):367–371. doi: 10.1136/ard.60.4.367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Liozon E, Herrmann F, Ly K, Robert PY, Loustaud V, Soria P, Vidal E. Risk factors for visual loss in giant cell (temporal) arteritis: a prospective study of 174 patients. Am J Med. 2001;111(3):211–217. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(01)00770-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ray-Chaudhuri N, Kiné DA, Tijani SO, Parums DV, Cartlidge N, Strong NP, Dayan MR. Effect of prior steroid treatment on temporal artery biopsy findings in giant cell arteritis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(5):530–532. doi: 10.1136/bjo.86.5.530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hall JK, Volpe NJ, Galetta SL, Liu GT, Syed NA, Balcer LJ. The role of unilateral temporal artery biopsy. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(3):543–548. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01758-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Salvarani C, Crowson CS, O’Fallon WM, Hunder GG, Gabriel SE. Reappraisal of the epidemiology of giant cell arteritis in Olmsted County, Minnesota, over a fifty-year period. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51(2):264–268. doi: 10.1002/art.20227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gonzalez-Gay MA, Lopez-Diaz MJ, Barros S, Garcia-Porrua C, Sanchez-Andrade A, Paz-Carreira J, Martin J, Llorca J. Giant cell arteritis: laboratory tests at the time of diagnosis in a series of 240 patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 2005;84(5):277–290. doi: 10.1097/01.md.0000180043.19285.54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gonzalez-Gay MA, Barros S, Lopez-Diaz MJ, Garcia-Porrua C, Sanchez-Andrade A, Llorca J. Giant cell arteritis: disease patterns of clinical presentation in a series of 240 patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 2005;84(5):269–276. doi: 10.1097/01.md.0000180042.42156.d1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Larsson K, Mellström D, Nordborg E, Odén A, Nordborg E. Early menopause, low body mass index, and smoking are independent risk factors for developing giant cell arteritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65(4):529–532. doi: 10.1136/ard.2005.039404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gonzalez-Gay MA, Miranda-Filloy JA, Lopez-Diaz MJ, Perez-Alvarez R, Gonzalez-Juanatey C, Sanchez-Andrade A, Martin J, Llorca J. Giant cell arteritis in northwestern Spain: a 25-year epidemiologic study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2007;86(2):61–68. doi: 10.1097/md.0b013e31803d1764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Narváez J, Bernad B, Roig-Vilaseca D, García-Gómez C, Gómez-Vaquero C, Juanola X, Rodriguez-Moreno J, Nolla JM, Valverde J. Influence of previous corticosteroid therapy on temporal artery biopsy yield in giant cell arteritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2007;37(1):13–19. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2006.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Makkuni D, Bharadwaj A, Wolfe K, Payne S, Hutchings A, Dasgupta B. Is intimal hyperplasia a marker of neuro-ophthalmic complications of giant cell arteritis? Rheumatology (Oxford) 2008;47(4):488–490. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ken012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gonzalez-Gay MA, Vazquez-Rodriguez TR, Gomez-Acebo I, Pego-Reigosa R, Lopez-Diaz MJ, Vazquez-Triñanes MC, Miranda-Filloy JA, Blanco R, Dierssen T, Llorca J. Strokes at time of disease diagnosis in a series of 287 patients with biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2009;88(4):227–235. doi: 10.1097/MD.0b013e3181af4518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhou L, Luneau K, Weyand CM, Biousse V, Newman NJ, Grossniklaus HE. Clinicopathologic correlations in giant cell arteritis: a retrospective study of 107 cases. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(8):1574–1580. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.02.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Martinez-Lado L, Calviño-Díaz C, Piñeiro A, Dierssen T, Vazquez-Rodriguez TR, Miranda-Filloy JA, Lopez-Diaz MJ, Blanco R, Llorca J, Gonzalez-Gay MA. Relapses and recurrences in giant cell arteritis: a population-based study of patients with biopsy-proven disease from northwestern Spain. Medicine (Baltimore) 2011;90(3):186–193. doi: 10.1097/MD.0b013e31821c4fad. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Walvick MD, Walvick MP. Giant cell arteritis: laboratory predictors of a positive temporal artery biopsy. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(6):1201–1204. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ninan J, Nguyen AM, Cole A, Rischmueller M, Dodd T, Roberts-Thomson P, Hill CL. Mortality in patients with biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis: a south Australian population-based study. J Rheumatol. 2011;38(10):2215–2217. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.101254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Movat HZ. Demonstration of all connective tissue elements in a single stain: pentochrome stains. Arch Pathol. 1955;60:289–295. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mahr A, Saba M, Kambouchner M, Polivka M, Baudrimont M, Brochériou I, Coste J, Guillevin L. Temporal artery biopsy for diagnosing giant cell arteritis: the longer, the better? Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65(6):826–828. doi: 10.1136/ard.2005.042770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Guevara RA, Newman NJ, Grossniklaus HE. Positive temporal artery biopsy 6 months after prednisone treatment. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116(9):1252–1253. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bowers JM. Arteritis of the temporal vessels: report of a case. Arch Intern Med. 1940;66:384–392. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Harrison CV. Giant-cell or temporal arteritis: a review. J Clin Pathol. 1948;1:197–211. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
