Skip to main content
BMJ Case Reports logoLink to BMJ Case Reports
. 2013 Feb 4;2013:bcr2012007702. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2012-007702

Pseudomyxoma extraperitonei: a rare presentation of a rare tumour

Carmina Diaz-Zorrilla 1, Antonio Ramos-De la Medina 1, Peter Grube-Pagola 2, Alfredo Ramirez-Gutierrez de Velasco 1
PMCID: PMC3604548  PMID: 23386488

Abstract

Pseudomyxoma extraperitonei is rare lesion resulting from the rupture of an appendiceal mucocele into the extraperitoneal tissues. We report a case of an 80-year-old woman with a medical history for a left hemicolectomy and a laparoscopic cholecystectomy 11 and 6 years, respectively, referred to our hospital for abdominal pain of increasing severity localised to the right hemiabdomen. The abdominal examination revealed a mobile mass a multidetector CT was performed; the patient was taken to surgery which was performed with no complications. Histopathological analysis of the tumour reported a pseudomyxoma associated to a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. The patient remains asymptomatic at a 1-year follow-up.

Background

A rare presentation of a rare tumour.

Case presentation

An 80-year-old female patient was referred to our hospital with a 3-year history of abdominal pain of increasing severity localised to the right hemiabdomen. Her medical history was relevant for a left hemicolectomy for colonic poliposis and a laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallstone disease 11 and 6 years, respectively, prior to her admission.

Investigations

On physical examination, she did not appear to be in acute distress. The abdominal examination revealed a mobile mass located to the right of the midline that extended from just below the costal border to the right iliac crest that was painful to palpation. There were no cervical, axillary or inguinal lymphadenopathies and there was not ascites. The rest of her exam was irrelevant. A multidetector CT (MDCT) was performed that showed a well-circumscribed mass anterior the right rectus muscle that measured 251×92 mm. The appendix and ovaries were not visible (figures 1 and 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

A multidetector CT showing an extraperitoneal mass.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

A multidetector CT showing an extraperitoneal mass.

Treatment

The patient was taken to operation where an extraperitoneal encapsulated mass was found without any involvement of neighbouring structures or intra-abdominal organs. It was completely resected without breaking the capsule or entering the abdominal cavity. Histopathological analysis reported a pseudomyxoma associated to a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemistry was positive for CK20 and CDX2 and negative for CK7 and calretinin (intestinal origin) (figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(A) Neoplastic epithelium with complex architecture, also appreciate abundant mucin (H&E, ×5). (B) Note cytological atypia and loss in nuclear polarity (haematoxylin and eosin, ×40). (C) CK20 and (D) CDX2 positive in neoplastic epithelium.

Outcome and follow-up

The patient was discharged 2 days after the surgery without any complications and continues to do well after 1-year follow-up.

Discussion

Pseudomyxoma peritonei was first described by Werth1 in 1884 as a rare condition consisting of mucinous ascites. In 1948, Bonann2 reported a pseudomyxoma involving only the retroperitoneum and it was first described by Coppii in 1950.3 Twenty years later, Early4 described a retroperitoneal mucocele of the appendix which contained 10 litres of mucus that had not ruptured and a complete curative excision was possible; this was termed by Moran5 as pseudomyxoma extraperitonei (PE) in 1988. Shelton et al6 later named it pseudomyxoma retroperitonei. Pseudomyxoma extraperitonei is a rare condition resulting from the rupture of an appendiceal mucocele into the extraperitoneal tissues. It can also arise from implantation of mucosal cells of the primary site accompanied of modified glandular cells with the ability to behave in an invasive tumour-like manner. Tumours of the appendix are very rare, with mucinous adenocarcinomas constituting 8% of all malignant neoplasms of the appendix with an estimated incidence of 0.2/100 000 population/year.7 Mucinous implants in the peritoneal cavity are almost always of appendiceal or ovarian origin.4 In a recent report, van Ruth et al8 suggest that the appendix is the primary source of most pseudomyxoma peritonei, which may then spread to sites like the ovaries. Unusual sources of mucinous adenocarcinoma causing pseudomyxoma peritonei have included colon, uterus, common bile duct, pancreas and the stomach. There are over 44 cases of PE or retroperitonei reported in the literature, most commonly presented as an extraperitoneal abdominal mass (table 1).

Table 1.

Pseudomyxoma extraperitonei reported cases

Age Sex Presentation Primary tumour Treatment Outcome Reference
74 M Abdominal pain and mass Appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinoma Debulking right hemicolectomy chemotherapy Recurrence 6 months, fistula year Ioannidis14
68 F Lumbar pain and mass Appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinoma Debulking right hemicolectomy chemotherapy Disease free at 3 years. Ioannidis14
48 F Abdominal pain and mass Ovary Debulking right oophorectomy and chemotherapy Recurrence at 4 years Chamisa15
51 F Right flank purulent and mucinous discharge, palpable mass. Appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinoma En block resection with a portion of iliac bone appendectomy, systemic chemotherapy and radiotherapy NA Cakmak16
80 F Lower abdominal mass Appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinoma Resection of mucous and ileum, cecum both ovaries and uterus NA Niwa17
57 M Lower abdominal pain and mass NA Excision of cyst radiotherapy chemotherapy Alive and disease free at years Solkar18
55 F Right lower abdominal pain and mass, retroperitoneal abscess Ascending solon cancer Right hemicolectomy oophorectomy, mucous removal. Systematic chemotherapy Alive, no recurrence 5 months Hirokawa19
78 F Right abdominal tumour and pain Appendiceal cystadenocarcinoma Right hemicolectomy NA Kojima20
NA M NA Mucinous paraenteric cyst NA NA Angelescu21
68 F NA Appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinoma Appendectomy debulking of mucous, intraoperative chemotherapy, systemic chemotherapy Recurrence at 5 month, disease free at 3 and a half years Liu22
58 F Abdominal pain, retroperitoneal mass Mucinous cystadenoma (primary or secondary) NA NA Matsuoka23
46 M Skin fistula, abdominal pain and mass Appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinoma Right hemicolectomy Recurrence at 3 months Koizumi24
53 F Retroperitoneal abscess Appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinoma Right hemicolectomy and debulking systemic chemotherapy Alive at 1 year Edrees25
NA NA NA NA NA NA Fujimura26
69 M Abdominal mass and pain, weight loss Appendiceal mucinous adenoma Debulking NA Tsai27
NA NA NA NA NA NA Hemet28
NA NA NA NA NA NA Oyama29
56 M Appendiceal abscess Appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinoma Drainage, radiotherapy Recurrence, Death 39 months Stevens30
65 M Abdominal mass Appendiceal cystadenocarcinoma Debulking and appendectomy NA Mor31
39 NA Right back pain and right lower abdominal mass Appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinoma Right hemicolectomy, resection of right iliopsoas muscle, partial peritonectomy NA Tamai32
NA NA NA NA NA NA Nobusawa33
NA NA Polyuria and back pain Appendiceal mucinous cystadenoma NA NA Baba34
81 M Abdominal mass Appendiceal mucinous cystadenoma Debulking and appendectomy Persistent discharge Shelton6
47 M Retroperitoneal mass with anterior thigh extension NA Excision Disease free at 3 years Fann et al35
NA NA NA NA NA NA Koyama36
NA NA NA Appendix NA NA Vladimirtseva37
58 M Right loin pain and abdominal mass NA Drainage, appendectomy and repeat drainage. Chemotherapy, radiotherapy mucolytic agents, radiofrequency hyperthermia Recurrence at 3 weeks, recurrence at 5 years with sinus formation. Alive at 10 years Moran5
67 M Flank pain and mass Appendix Surgical debulking retroperitoneal chemotherapy Recurrence at 2 years. Recurrence at 5 years Brady38
NA NA NA NA NA NA Shimabukuro39
NA NA NA NA NA NA Torgunakov40
NA NA NA NA NA NA Kayser41
NA NA NA Appendix NA NA Chetchueva42
NA NA NA Appendiceal cyst NA NA Chekharina43
NA NA NA Probable appendicular NA NA Coppini3
37 M Tender abdominal mass Mucocele of appendix Evacuation of cyst in 2 stage procedure NA Bonnan2
57 M Abdominal mass Mucocele of appendix Debulking of tumour Alive at 2 years Early4
50 F Total uterine prolapse Appendix Excision, omentectomy, total hysterectomy and oophorectomy No evidence of disease 2 years Snyder and Vandivort.44
63 M Retroperitoneal mass Appendix Excision No evidence of disease Early et al4
41 M Pleural mass Appendix Chemotherapy Death of disease 2.5 years Radosavljevic et al45
65 M Inguino labial hernia Appendix Excision Alive with disease 9 years Ben-Hur et al46
33 M Scrotal mass Rectum Debulking, omentectomy No evidence of disease at 9 months Baker et al47
38 M Pleural mass Appendix Excision, chemotherapy Alive with disease at 2.5 years Peek and Beets48
53 M Retroperitoneal mass with skin fistula Appendix NA NA Koizumi and Noiguchi49
75 M Scrotal mass Appendix Chemotherapy Dead of disease Al-Bozom9

The pathogenesis for extraperitoneal pseydomyxoma peritonei in most cases is explained by one of the following reasons: (1) a communication through hernial sac; (2) increased intra-abdominal pressure (cases of uterovaginal prolapse) or (3) a leak through the peritoneum (retroperitoneal presentation associated with intraperitoneal pseudomyxoma). In the absence of peritoneal pseudomyxoma, a variant of the anatomy of the appendix (retroperitoneal location) may be the explanation; however, it is still speculative.9 In the present case, we could not demonstrate a communication with the abdominal cavity. The port sites used for the laparoscopic cholecystectomy did not appear to be the source of access to the preperitoneum. Preoperative diagnosis is very rare; symptoms like fatigue, decreased appetite and slowly progressing pain are common. Ultrasound and MDCT may contribute to the diagnosis, typical findings of pseudomyxoma peritonei are ascites, localised fluid collection throughout the abdomen and pelvis, omental thickening and deformity of the liver surface may be absent in PE.10 11 Several treatments have been used. Sugarbaker et al12 advocate radical surgery together with preoperative intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy. The reported 5-year survival of patients with Pseudomyxoma peritonei varies from 11% to 75% (mean 50%).13 The role of adjuvant treatment in Pseudomyxoma extraperitonei and survival rates are not well known owing to the scarcity of reported cases. However, the disease is benign and the prognosis is likely to be better than Pseudomyxoma peritonei as the vital abdominal structures are not involved.5

Learning points.

  • Preoperative diagnosis is very rare.

  • The disease is benign and the prognosis is likely to be better than Pseudomyxoma peritonei as the vital abdominal structures are not involved.

  • The rarity of pseudomyxoma extraperitonei makes outcomes difficult to predict.

Footnotes

Competing interests: None.

Patient consent: Obtained.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

  • 1.Werth R. Pseudomyxoma peritonei. Arch Gynaecol 1884;24:100–18 [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bonnan LJ, Davis JG. Retroperitoneal mucocoele of the appendix. A case report with characteristic roentgen features. Radiology 1948;51:375–82 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Coppini B. Su di un rarissimo caso di pseudomixoma retroperitoneale di probabile origine appendicolare. G Clin Med 1950;31:601–12 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Early KS, Stephenson DV, Davis WC. Giant retroperitoneal mucocele simulating pseudomyxoma peritonei and mucinous adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg 1968;116:439–43 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Moran CJ, Morgan RH. Pseudomyxoma extraperitonei. J Roy Soc Med 1988;81:668–9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shelton MW, Morian JP, Radford DM. Pseudomyxoma retroperitonei associated with appendiceal cystadenoma. Am Surg 1994;60:958–60 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Deans GT, Spence RAJ. Neoplastic lesions of the appendix. Br J Surg 1995;82:299–306 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Van Ruth S, Acherman YIZ, van de Vijwer MJ, et al. Pseudomyxoma peritonei: a review of 62 cases. Eur J Surg Oncol 2003;29:682–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Issam A, Al-Bozom MD. Extraperitoneal presentation of pseudomyxoma peritonei as a scrotal mass: case report and review of the literature. Ann Saudi Med 2000;20:3–4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yeh H, Shafir M K, Slater G, et al. Ultrasonography and computed tomography in pseudomyxoma peritonei. Radiology 1984;153:507–10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Seshul MB, Coulam CM. Pseudomyxoma peritonei:computedtomography and sonography. Am J Roentgenol 1981;136:803–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sugarbaker PH, Kern K, Lack E. Malignant pseudomyxoma peritonei of colonic origin: natural history and presentation of a curative approach to treatment. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:772–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sherer D, Abulafia O, Eliakim R. Pseudomyxoma peritonei: a review of current literature. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2001;51:73–80 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. doi: 10.4321/s1130-01082012000500009. Ioannidis O, Cheva A, Paraskevas G, et al. Pseudomyxoma retroperitonei: report of 2 cases and review of the literature. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2012;104:268–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chamisa I. Pseudomyxoma extraperitonei of ovarian origin mimicking a psoas abscess. Gynecol Surg 2011;8:373–5 [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cakmak A, Karakayali F, Bayar S, et al.  Pseudomyxoma retroperitonei presenting with a skin fistula. Turk J Gastroenterol 2009;20:79–80 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Niwa H, Hiramatsu T, Ishihara Y. Clinical challenges and images in GI. Pseudomyxoma retroperitonei. Gastroenterology 2007;133:14, 372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Solkar MH, Akhtar NM, Khan Z, et al.  Pseudomyxoma extraperitonei occurring 35 years after appendicectomy: a case report and review of literature. World J Surg Oncol 2004;2:19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hirokawa F, Ono K, Hayashido M, et al.  A case of retroperitoneal pseudomyxoma originated from mucinous adenocarcinoma of the ascending colon (in Japanese). J W akayama Med Soc 2004;55:154–8 [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kojima M, Takahashi N, Yazawa Ket al. A case of pseudomyxoma retroperitonei (in Japanese). Surgery (in Japanese) 2001;63:742–5 [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Angelescu N, Bordea A, Popa E, et al.  Pseudomixomul peritoneal (peritonita gelatinoasa). Chirurgia (Bucur). 2001;96:443–51 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Liu ZL, Jiang YY. Pseudomyxoma retroperitonei due to the primary appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinoma (in Chinese). World J Med Today 2001;4:292–3 [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Matsuoka Y, Masumoto T, Suzuki K, et al.  Pseudomyxoma retroperitonei. Eur Radiol 1999;9:457–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Koizumi J, Noguchi H. Pseudomyxoma retroperitonei with spontaneous skin fistula. Abdom Imaging 1999;24:193–5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Edrees WK, Hannon RJ. Pseudomyxoma extraperitonei: a rare presentation mimicking an iliacus abscess. Ulster Med J 1999;68:38–9 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fujimura T, Yonemura Y, Fujita Het al. Chemohyperthermic peritoneal perfusion for peritoneal dissemination in various intra-abdominal malignancies. Int Surg 1999;84:60–6 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tsai CJ. Ultrasound features of disseminaed adenomucinosis (pseudomyxoma). Br J Radiol 1998;71:564–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hemet J, Lemoine F, Irimescu D, et al.  Le pseudomyxome extraperitoneal. A propos de 3 observations. Ann Pathol 1998;18:137–40 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Oyama T, Kabayashi H, Minoda T, et al.  Case report. Pseudomyxoma retroperitonei (in Japanese). Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi 1997;57:620–1 [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Stevens KJ, Dunn WK, Balfour T. Pseudomyxoma extraperitonei: a lethal complication of mucinous adenocarcinoma of the appendix. Am J Gastroenterol 1997;92:1920–2 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mor Y, Leibovitch I, Garniek A, et al.  Case report: pseudomyxoma extraperitonei: an unusual presentation mimicking a huge hydronephrotic kidney. Clin Radiol 1996;51:221–2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tamai O, Muto Y, Shiraishi H, et al.  Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of vermiform appendix involving retroperitoneum (in Japanese). J Jpn Soc ColoProctol 1995;48:496–501 [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nobusawa H, Hashimoto T, Munechika H, et al.  CT findings of primary retroperitoneal cystic tumors: with special emphasis on the distinction between benignancy and malignancy (in Japanese). Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi 1995;55:861–6 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Baba Y, Nakajo M, Kajiya Y, et al.  A case of retroperitoneal pseudomyxoma. Radiat Med 1995;13:247–9 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Fann JI, Vierra M, Fisher D, et al.  Pseudomyxoma peritonei. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1993;177:441–7 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Koyama A, Ichikawa T, Honma M, et al.  A case of retroperitoneal pseudomyxoma (in Japanese). Jpn J Clin Radiol (Rinsho Hoshasen) 1992;37:519–21 [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Vladimirtseva AL, Chattalos MG, Poletaev VA. Psevdomiksoma retrotsekal'no raspolozhennogo cherveobraznogo otrostka s prorastaniem v zabriushinnoe prostranstvo i aruzhnymi svishchami. Arkh Patol 1989;51:74–6 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Brady MB, Ewing RH, Robinson AE, et al.  Flank mass and pain in a 72-year-old man. Invest Radiol 1986;21:419–23 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shimabukuro Y, Miyagi T, Irabu T, et al.  A case of giant pseudomyxoma in the retroperitoneum (in Japanese). Okinawa Ikaishi 1984;21:486–7 [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Torgunakov AP, Pavliuk VD. Psevdomiksoma briushnoi polosti i zabriushinnogo prostranstva. Vestn Khir Im I I Grek 1975;114:139–40 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kayser HW. Pseudomyxoma retroperitoneale. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 1960;20:730–3 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Chetchueva TA. Zabriushinnaia psevdomiksoma cherveobraznogo otrostka. Arkh Patol 1957;19:64–6 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chekharina EA. Psevdomiksoma zabriushinnogo prostranstva iz kisty cherveobraznogo otrostka. Vopr Onkol 1955;1:103–5 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Snyder TE, Vandivort MR. Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the appendix with pseudomyxoma peritonei presenting as total uterine prolapse: a case report. J Reprod Med 1992;37:103–6 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Radosavljevic G, Nedeljkovic B, Kacar V. Pseudomyxoma of the pleural and peritoneal cavities. Thorax 1993;48:94–5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ben-Hur H, Schachter M, Mashiah A, et al.  Recurrent mucinous adenocarcinoma of the ovary presenting as an inguino-labial hernia. Eur J Gynecol Oncol 1996;17:299–302 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Baker WC, Goldman LB, deVere, et al. Pseudomyxoma peritonei presenting as a scrotal mass. J Urol 1988;139:821–3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Peek DF, Beets GL. Pseudomyxoma peritonei in the pleural cavity; report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:113–15 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Koizumi J, Noiguchi H. Pseudomyxoma retroperitonei with spontaneous skin fistula. Abdom Imaging 1999;24:193–5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ Case Reports are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES