ABSTRACT
Geobacter sulfurreducens strain KN400 was recovered in previous studies in which a culture of the DL1 strain of G. sulfurreducens served as the inoculum in investigations of microbial current production at low anode potentials (−400 mV versus Ag/AgCl). Differences in the genome sequences of KN400 and DL1 were too great to have arisen from adaptive evolution during growth on the anode. Previous deep sequencing (80-fold coverage) of the DL1 culture failed to detect sequences specific to KN400, suggesting that KN400 was an external contaminant inadvertently introduced into the anode culturing system. In order to evaluate this further, a portion of the gene for OmcS, a c-type cytochrome that both KN400 and DL1 possess, was amplified from the DL1 culture. HiSeq-2000 Illumina sequencing of the PCR product detected the KN400 sequence, which differs from the DL1 sequence at 14 bp, at a frequency of ca. 1 in 105 copies of the DL1 sequence. A similar low frequency of KN400 was detected with quantitative PCR of a KN400-specific gene. KN400 persisted at this frequency after intensive restreaking of isolated colonies from the DL1 culture. However, a culture in which KN400 could no longer be detected was obtained by serial dilution to extinction in liquid medium. The KN400-free culture could not grow on an anode poised at −400 mV. Thus, KN400 cryptically persisted in the culture dominated by DL1 for more than a decade, undetected by even deep whole-genome sequencing, and was only fortuitously uncovered by the unnatural selection pressure of growth on a low-potential electrode.
IMPORTANCE
Repeated streaking of isolated colonies on solidified medium remains a common strategy for obtaining pure cultures, especially of difficult-to-cultivate microorganisms such as strict anaerobes. The results presented here demonstrate that verifying the purity of cultures obtained in this manner may be difficult because extremely rare variants can persist, undetectable with even deep genomic DNA sequencing. The only way to ensure that a culture is pure is to cultivate it from an initial single cell, which may be technically difficult for many environmentally significant microbes.
Observation
Much of the progress in microbiology has depended on the study of “pure cultures.” These are cultures that contain only one type of cell, ideally with the culture derived from an initial single cell. From the early development of methods for establishing pure cultures (1), there have been many examples in which cultures that were initially considered to be pure were subsequently found to contain two types of microbes. In some instances, these inadvertent multispecies cultures have led to important breakthroughs, such as the discovery of interspecies hydrogen transfer (2). However, with the advent of deep sequencing technologies, it might reasonably be predicted that undetected contaminants in cultures would no longer be a significant concern.
Geobacter sulfurreducens strain PCA was isolated in the mid-1990s by using standard enrichment and isolation techniques that included dilution to extinction in liquid medium, followed by repeated streaking of isolated colonies on agar-solidified medium (3). This is the classic strategy taught in the most popular introductory microbiology textbooks (4–6). Later, G. sulfurreducens strain DL1 was obtained by additional restreaking of isolated PCA colonies (7). With the development of methods for the genetic manipulation of G. sulfurreducens (7) and the sequencing of its genome (8), G. sulfurreducens became the Geobacter species of choice for the study of the physiology and novel extracellular electron transfer properties of this environmentally important genus (9). Initial sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene in the culture (3), as well as sequencing of the genome first to 8-fold (8) and then to 80-fold (10, 11) coverage, indicated that the culture contained only one strain.
In an attempt to adaptively evolve DL1 to produce more current, it was inoculated into a bioelectrical system with a graphite anode poised at a potential (−400 mV versus Ag/AgCl) considered to be near the lower limit at which current generation from acetate would be possible (12). An isolate obtained from the anode biofilm, designated G. sulfurreducens strain KN400 (12), is superior to the inoculum strain in producing electrical current, and this superiority is attributed at least in part to its ability to produce more “microbial nanowires,” electrically conductive protein filaments that exhibit metallic-like electrical conductivity (13, 14).
It was initially assumed that strain KN400 had accumulated one or more mutations that enhanced its capacity for extracellular electron transfer. This would be analogous to the selection for mutant strains during adaptive evolution of strain DL1 for electron exchange with other organisms (11) or higher rates of Fe(III) oxide reduction (10). However, comparative genomics revealed that the genome sequence of strain KN400 contained more than 27,270 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (15). A third of the genes had at least one nucleotide polymorphism, and a quarter had a polymorphism that affected the resulting protein sequence (15). Based on typical mutation rates of 6.3 × 10−9/bp per generation (16), it would take more than 1,000 years to accumulate this many mutations in strain DL1. Furthermore, there are no orthologs in the DL1 strain for 139 of the open reading frames (ORFs) in the KN400 strain genome, most of which are most closely related to genes in phylogenetically diverse organisms (15).
These considerations and the fact that the ORFs unique to KN400 were not detected when the inoculum culture was resequenced (10, 11) led to the hypothesis that KN400 entered the bioelectrochemical system as a contaminant. To evaluate this possibility, the purity of the DL1 culture was further assessed with even higher sensitivity.
Both DL1 and KN400 contain omcS, a gene for an outer surface cytochrome that has one of the highest proportions of SNPs (36 SNPs/kb) between the two strains (15). This gene was amplified from the DL1 culture that had been used to inoculate the bioelectrochemical system, and the PCR products were sequenced with Illumina Hi-Seq 2000 (see Text S1 in the supplemental material). The KN400 sequence was detected, indicating that KN400 was present in the initial inoculum used for the anode selection study. However, of the >107 high-quality sequences recovered, only 286 were KN400 sequences versus 1.5 × 107 DL1 sequences (Table 1).
TABLE 1 .
Estimates of strain KN400 abundance in various culturesa
| Approach | No. of sequences |
|
|---|---|---|
| DL1 or PCA | KN400 | |
| Sequencing assay | ||
| DL1 culture | 1.5 × 107 | 286 |
| PCA culture ATCC 51573 | 3.2 × 107 | 52 |
| DL1 additional restreaking | 2.5 × 107 | 185 |
| DL1 serial-dilution culture | 3.6 × 107 | 0 |
| qPCR assay | ||
| DL1 culture | 1.5 × 107 | 980 |
| PCA culture ATCC 51573 | 4.6 × 107 | 12 |
| DL1 additional restreaking | 2.5 × 107 | 33 |
| DL1 serial-dilution culture | 6.4 × 107 | Undetectable |
In the sequencing assay, a portion of the sequence of omcS was amplified from genomic DNA with primers omcSRT F and omcSI R (see Table S1 in the supplemental material), the PCR product was sequenced, and the KN400- and DL1-specific omcS sequences, which differed in 14 bp (see Fig S1 in the supplemental material), were quantified. In the qPCR approach, KN400 abundance was estimated with primers hisRT F and hisRT R (see Table S1), which amplify a gene for a sensor histidine kinase response regulator found in KN400, but not in DL1, and total cell abundance was estimated with primers omcSRT F and omcSRT R (see Table S1), which amplify a portion of the omcS sequence in both strains.
The relative abundance of the KN400 strain in this same culture was further evaluated by quantitative PCR (qPCR) with a primer set specific for a gene found only in KN400 (see Text S1 and Table S1 in the supplemental material) and a primer set that detected both KN400 and DL1 (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). The relative abundance of the KN400-specific sequence was similar to that of the KN400 omcS sequences determined by the sequencing approach (Table 1). Sequence analysis and qPCR assay of the PCA culture deposited at ATCC revealed the presence of KN400 at a similar low abundance (Table 1).
We attempted to remove the rare KN400 contaminant from the DL1 culture by repeated restreaking of isolated colonies grown on solidified acetate-fumarate medium (7), but the KN400 strain continued to persist at a low frequency in the isolated colonies (Table 1). However, a culture in which KN400 could no longer be detected was obtained in liquid acetate-fumarate medium (see Text S1 in the supplemental material) in which the highest dilution exhibiting growth was subjected to several successive rounds of serial dilution (Table 1). This demonstrated that the DL1 strain does not require the rare presence of KN400 in order to grow in the acetate-fumarate medium on which this culture is routinely maintained.
When pure KN400 and the KN400-free DL1 culture were inoculated into acetate-fumarate medium in equal quantities, DL1 outcompeted KN400 (Fig. 1a). This is consistent with the finding that when the two strains were grown separately, DL1 grew much faster than KN400 (optical density at 600 nm [OD600] of 0.04 for KN400 versus 0.65 for DL1 after 36 h of incubation; see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material) in the same medium. The proportion of KN400 continued to decline with consecutive transfers (1% inoculum) until the abundance of KN400 was comparable to that in the PCA and DL1 stock cultures (see Text S1 in the supplemental material). KN400 persisted at this low level with further transfers (Fig. 1a).
FIG 1 .
Growth and activity of strain KN400 under different growth conditions. (a) Relative abundance of KN400 in successive mid-log transfers (1% inoculum) of a culture initiated with equal proportions of KN400 and DL1. The results are the means and standard deviations of triplicate cultures. (b) Current production when the DL1 culture was introduced into the anode chamber of a bioelectrochemical system with a graphite anode poised at −400 mV versus Ag/AgCl. The KN400-free culture produced no current over this time. (c) Relative abundance of KN400 in anode biofilms when the initial inoculum was the DL1 culture subsequently found to also contain KN400. The results are the means and standard deviations of triplicate cultures.
Repeated attempts to grow the KN400-free DL1 culture on an anode poised at −400 mV were unsuccessful. However, current was readily produced in another set of experiments in which the DL1 culture containing KN400 served as the inoculum (Fig. 1b). A qPCR assay of DNA extracted from the anode biofilm indicated that 100% of the omcS sequences were KN400 within the second transfer (Fig. 1c). These results suggested that the reason why KN400 emerged on the anodes was that the DL1 strain was not able to grow under the conditions imposed. Without this unusual selective pressure, KN400 would have remained undetected in the PCA and DL1 cultures even by currently available next-generation sequencing methods that can theoretically provide thousandsfold coverage in genome sequencing.
The factors contributing to the long-term persistence of strain KN400 at extremely low frequency in the DL1 culture remain a mystery. The importance of physically isolating single cells by methods more definitive than streaking on solid medium to establish pure cultures has been recognized for some time (17), and increasingly more sophisticated methods for accomplishing this continue to be developed (18–23). However, the plating methods that have been in use for more than 100 years and are taught to every microbiology student as standard procedures for obtaining pure cultures (4–6) remain the most common. The results presented here demonstrate that without single-cell isolation, cryptic contaminants may survive at very low frequency in cultures over decades of intensive investigation and can escape detection by even the most sophisticated sequencing methods currently available.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Materials and methods: a, detection of omcS sequences by sequencing; b, qPCR; c, streak plating and dilution to extinction; d, growth curve and coculturing of strains DL1 and KN400; e, growth on a negatively poised anode. Download
Comparison of the 315-bp-long partial omcS sequences of strains KN400 and DL1 amplified for Illumina library preparation. Strains DL1 and PCA have 100% identical omcS nucleotide sequences. Download
Measurement of OD600 of G. sulfurreducens DL1 and KN400 cells against time (hours). The values are means of three replicate samples, and the error bars represent the standard deviations. Download
Primer sets and cycling conditions used during qPCR and Illumina sample preparation.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We thank Adina Chuang Howe for suggesting the sequencing strategy for rare variant detection. This research was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy Genomic Sciences Program under cooperative agreement DE-FC02-02ER63446.
Footnotes
Citation Shrestha PM, Nevin KP, Shrestha M, Lovley DR. 2013. When is a microbial culture “pure”? Persistent cryptic contaminant escapes detection even with deep genome sequencing. mBio 4(2):e00591-12. doi:10.1128/mBio.00591-12.
REFERENCES
- 1. Koch R. 1893. Über den augenblicklichen Stand der bakteriologischen Choleradiagnose. Z. Hyg. Infektionskr. 14:319–333 [Google Scholar]
- 2. Bryant MP, Wolin EA, Wolin MJ, Wolfe RS. 1967. Methanobacillus omelianskii, a symbiotic association of two species of bacteria. Arch. Mikrobiol. 59:20–31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Caccavo F, Jr, Lonergan DJ, Lovley DR, Davis M, Stolz JF, McInerney MJ. 1994. Geobacter sulfurreducens sp. nov., a hydrogen- and acetate-oxidizing dissimilatory metal-reducing microorganism . Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60:3752–3759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Lengeler J, Drews G, Schlegel H. 1999. Biology of the prokaryotes. Blackwell Science Press, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
- 5. Pelczar MJ, Chan ECS, Krieg NR. 1993. Microbiology: concepts and applications. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
- 6. Madigan MT. 2012. Brock biology of microorganisms, 13th ed. Benjamin-Cummings, San Francisco, CA. [Google Scholar]
- 7. Coppi MV, Leang C, Sandler SJ, Lovley DR. 2001. Development of a genetic system for Geobacter sulfurreducens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:3180–3187 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Methé BA, Nelson KE, Eisen JA, Paulsen IT, Nelson W, Heidelberg JF, Wu D, Wu M, Ward N, Beanan MJ, Dodson RJ, Madupu R, Brinkac LM, Daugherty SC, DeBoy RT, Durkin AS, Gwinn M, Kolonay JF, Sullivan SA, Haft DH, Selengut J, Davidsen TM, Zafar N, White O, Tran B, Romero C, Forberger HA, Weidman J, Khouri H, Feldblyum TV, Utterback TR, Van Aken SE, Lovley DR, Fraser CM. 2003. Genome of Geobacter sulfurreducens: metal reduction in subsurface environments. Science 302:1967–1969 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Lovley DR, Ueki T, Zhang T, Malvankar NS, Shrestha PM, Flanagan KA, Aklujkar M, Butler JE, Giloteaux L, Rotaru AE, Holmes DE, Franks AE, Orellana R, Risso C, Nevin KP. 2011. Geobacter: the microbe electric’s physiology, ecology, and practical applications. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 59:1–100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Tremblay PL, Summers ZM, Glaven RH, Nevin KP, Zengler K, Barrett CL, Qiu Y, Palsson BO, Lovley DR. 2011. A c-type cytochrome and a transcriptional regulator responsible for enhanced extracellular electron transfer in Geobacter sulfurreducens revealed by adaptive evolution. Environ. Microbiol. 13:13–23 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Summers ZM, Ueki T, Ismail W, Haveman SA, Lovley DR. 2012. Laboratory evolution of Geobacter sulfurreducens for enhanced growth on lactate via a single-base-pair substitution in a transcriptional regulator. ISME J. 6:975–983 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Yi H, Nevin KP, Kim BC, Franks AE, Klimes A, Tender LM, Lovley DR. 2009. Selection of a variant of Geobacter sulfurreducens with enhanced capacity for current production in microbial fuel cells. Biosens. Bioelectron. 24:3498–3503 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Malvankar NS, Vargas M, Nevin KP, Franks AE, Leang C, Kim BC, Inoue K, Mester T, Covalla SF, Johnson JP, Rotello VM, Tuominen MT, Lovley DR. 2011. Tunable metallic-like conductivity in microbial nanowire networks. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6:573–579 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Reguera G, McCarthy KD, Mehta T, Nicoll JS, Tuominen MT, Lovley DR. 2005. Extracellular electron transfer via microbial nanowires. Nature 435:1098–1101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Butler JE, Young ND, Aklujkar M, Lovley DR. 2012. Comparative genomic analysis of Geobacter sulfurreducens KN400, a strain with enhanced capacity for extracellular electron transfer and electricity production. BMC Genomics 13:471 http://dx.doi.10.1186/1471-2164-13-471 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Barrick JE, Yu DS, Yoon SH, Jeong H, Oh TK, Schneider D, Lenski RE, Kim JF. 2009. Genome evolution and adaptation in a long-term experiment with Escherichia coli. Nature 461:1243–1247 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Orskov J. 1922. Method for the isolation of bacteria in pure culture from single cells and procedure for the direct tracing of bacterial growth on a solid medium. J. Bacteriol. 7:537–549 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Schut F, de Vries EJ, Gottschal JC, Robertson BR, Harder W, Prins RA, Button DK. 1993. Isolation of typical marine bacteria by dilution culture: growth, maintenance, and characteristics of isolates under laboratory conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59:2150–2160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Button DK, Schut F, Quang P, Martin R, Robertson BR. 1993. Viability and isolation of marine bacteria by dilution culture: theory, procedures, and initial results. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59:881–891 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Haas CN. 1989. Estimation of microbial densities from dilution count experiments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55:1934–1942 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Connon SA, Giovannoni SJ. 2002. High-throughput methods for culturing microorganisms in very-low-nutrient media yield diverse new marine isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:3878–3885 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Zhang H, Liu KK. 2008. Optical tweezers for single cells. J. R. Soc. Interface 5:671–690 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Ferrari BC, Winsley TJ, Bergquist PL, Van Dorst J. 2012. Flow cytometry in environmental microbiology: a rapid approach for the isolation of single cells for advanced molecular biology analysis. Methods Mol. Biol. 881:3–26 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Materials and methods: a, detection of omcS sequences by sequencing; b, qPCR; c, streak plating and dilution to extinction; d, growth curve and coculturing of strains DL1 and KN400; e, growth on a negatively poised anode. Download
Comparison of the 315-bp-long partial omcS sequences of strains KN400 and DL1 amplified for Illumina library preparation. Strains DL1 and PCA have 100% identical omcS nucleotide sequences. Download
Measurement of OD600 of G. sulfurreducens DL1 and KN400 cells against time (hours). The values are means of three replicate samples, and the error bars represent the standard deviations. Download
Primer sets and cycling conditions used during qPCR and Illumina sample preparation.

