Abstract
Biofabricated metal nanoparticles are generally biocompatible, inexpensive, and ecofriendly, therefore, are used preferably in industries, medical and material science research. Considering the importance of biofabricated materials, we isolated, characterized and identified a novel bacterial strain OS4 of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (GenBank: JN247637.1). At neutral pH, this Gram negative bacterial strain significantly reduced hexavalent chromium, an important heavy metal contaminant found in the tannery effluents and minings. Subsequently, even at room temperature the supernatant of log phase grown culture of strain OS4 also reduced silver nitrate (AgNO3) to generate nanoparticles (AgNPs). These AgNPs were further characterized by UV–visible, Nanophox particle size analyzer, XRD, SEM and FTIR. As evident from the FTIR data, plausibly the protein components of supernatant caused the reduction of AgNO3. The cuboid and homogenous AgNPs showed a characteristic UV-visible peak at 428 nm with average size of ∼93 nm. The XRD spectra exhibited the characteristic Bragg peaks of 111, 200, 220 and 311 facets of the face centred cubic symmetry of nanoparticles suggesting that these nanoparticles were crystalline in nature. From the nanoparticle release kinetics data, the rapid release of AgNPs was correlated with the particle size and increasing surface area of the nanoparticles. A highly significant antimicrobial activity against medically important bacteria by the biofabricated AgNPs was also revealed as decline in growth of Staphylococcus aureus (91%), Escherichia coli (69%) and Serratia marcescens (66%) substantially. Additionally, different cytotoxic assays showed no toxicity of AgNPs to liver function, RBCs, splenocytes and HeLa cells, hence these particles were safe to use. Therefore, this novel bacterial strain OS4 is likely to provide broad spectrum benefits for curing chromium polluted sites, for biofabrication of AgNPs and ultimately in the nanoparticle based drug formulation for the treatment of infectious diseases.
Introduction
Chromium (Cr) used in the leather industry to tan hides is not taken up completely by leather and hence, relatively large amounts of Cr escapes into the effluent. The south eastern part of the largest industrial city of India, Kanpur, near the south bank of river Ganga, has more than 350 tanneries. The lack of stringent laws and treatment facilities has led to tannery wastes/sludge being dumped on temporary sites leading to the contamination of soil and ground water with serious environmental impacts during leather processing [1]. The toxicological impact of Cr(VI) originates from the action of this form itself as an oxidizing agent, as well as from the formation of free radicals during the reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) occurring inside the cell. Cr is a toxic element to higher vascular plants and is detrimental to its growth, development and reproduction [2]. Mine workers are habitually exposed to Cr(VI) contaminated dust and water and, therefore, suffer from gastrointestinal bleeding, tuberculosis, asthma, infertility and birth defects. In some cases, twenty times the international standard for Cr(VI) has been detected in drinking water. Due to certain difficulties associated with physicochemical methods adapted for detoxification/remediation of Cr contaminated sites, biological treatments in recent times have received greater attention being an economical and environment friendly as compared to conventional technologies [3]. The bioremediation strategy involves the conversion of Cr(VI) into less toxic and less mobile Cr(III), which consequently is immobilized in the soil matrix [4]. In this context, many microbes have been reported to reduce Cr(VI) under aerobic and anaerobic conditions [5]–[7].
Nanomaterials synthesized so far, on other hand, have shown some profound effect on human health, economic growth and the environment. The development of techniques for the controlled production of nanoparticles of well-defined size, shape and composition, to be used in biomedical sciences, optics and electronics, is however, still a major challenge [8]. Therefore, realizing the undeniable magnitude of this technology and its consequential impact on human health and the environment, various governments and private sectors at global level have significantly increased their fundings in vital sectors like medicine, manufacturing, energy and transportation. Following this, the material science research in recent times has achieved considerable importance due to the unique property of nanoparticle size and shape [9]. Also, the inherent characteristics of nanoparticles such as high surface to volume ratios and quantum confinement result in materials that are qualitatively different from their bulk counterparts [10]. Generally, nanoparticles are synthesized by different physico-chemical methods [11]–[13], which are however, expensive and environment disruptive. Therefore, interest is growing every day to develop inexpensive, clean, non-toxic and eco-friendly strategies for the synthesis of nanoparticles with broad spectrum activity. In this regard, the advent of fabrication of bio-based advanced nanomaterials has provided solutions to the problems. For example, fabricated materials are now being used as/in (i) catalysts in chemical reactions [14] (ii) antibacterial agents [15], [16] (iii) biosensors [17] (iv) cancer therapy [18] and (v) bio-control agents [19] etc. Recently, eco-friendly synthetic chemistry approaches have however, involved some biological systems such as yeast [20], fungi [21], bacteria [22] and plant extracts [23] for the synthesis of nanoparticles. Some of the most commonly used microorganisms for developing microbes based silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) include fungi like Fusarium spp. [24] and Aspergillus spp. [25] and bacteria such as Enterobacteria spp. [26], Pseudomonas spp. [27], Bacillus spp. [28], and Geobacter spp. [29]. Mechanistically, the ability of bacterial strain to reduce nitrate [30] has been exploited in the reduction of silver nitrate (AgNO3) in to elemental nanomaterial [31].
Considering the significance of bio-based fabricated nanomaterials, the present study was designed to find bacterial strain originating from the heavy metal contaminated sites and to characterize the strain through molecular and biochemical approaches. The bacterial strain was further tested for its chromium and nitrate reducing ability. The bacterial strain was also used to synthesize AgNPs at room temperature in the absence of any reducing agent. The resulting AgNPs were subsequently characterized using some of the standard analytical techniques like, UV–visible, Nanoparticle Size Analyzer, SEM, XRD and FTIR spectroscopy. In addition to the antibacterial activity on both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, the cytotoxicity of biofabricated AgNPs was tested on liver function, RBCs, splenocytes and HeLa cell lines.
Materials and Methods
Isolation and Bacterial Characterization
The soil samples were collected in sterile polythene bags (15–12 cm2) from the rhizosphere of sweet pea (Pisum sativum) fields located at the outskirts of Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India. Historically, the agronomic field was irrigated consistently by industrial sewage water of Hindon river. In order to isolate the bacterial strain, a serial dilution assay was carried out in normal saline solution and 10 µL of diluted suspension was spread plated on nutrient agar (NA) medium. Plates were incubated at 28±2°C for three days. A total of 20 bacterial strains were selected and characterized. Biochemical activities were tested through citrate utilization, indole production, methyl red test, nitrate reduction, Voges Proskauer, catalase test, oxidase carbohydrates (dextrose, mannitol and sucrose) utilization, starch hydrolysis, and gelatin liquefaction test [32].
16S rDNA Based Identification
Out of the total 20 bacterial strains, strain OS4 was identified by 16S rDNA gene sequence analysis. The partial sequencing of 16S rDNA of the strain OS4 was done commercially by Sequencing Service, Macrogen Inc., Seoul, South Korea using universal primers, 518F (5′CCAGCAGCCGCGGTAATACG3′) and 800R (5′TACCAGGGTATCTAATCC3′). Later, nucleotide sequence data were deposited in the Gen-Bank, NCBI sequence database. The online NCBI program nBLAST was employed to identify the related sequences with known taxonomic information already present at NCBI website (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST) to accurately identify the bacterial strain OS4. Phylogenetic tree was constructed by the neighbour-joining method [33] of the MEGA 4.1 software programme [34].
Optimization of Growth and Hexavalent Chromium Reduction Conditions
The effect of viable bacterial populations and pH on hexavalent chromium, Cr(VI), reduction was assessed using nutrient broth (NB) amended with 100 µg ml−1 of Cr6+. The sterilized medium was adjusted to pH 2 to 12 with 1 M HCL or 1 M NaOH. A-100 µl of exponentially grown culture of S. maltophilia OS4 was inoculated into NB medium containing upto100 µgml−1 of Cr(VI) and incubated at 35±2°C in an orbital shaking incubator at 120 rpm upto 48 h. For Cr6+ reduction, 1 ml culture from each flask was centrifuged (6000 rpm) for 10 min at 20°C, and Cr6+ in the supernatant was determined by the 1,5–diphenyl carbazide method [35], [36].
Medium and Growth Conditions for Supernatant Preparation
The bacterial isolate OS4 was inoculated in sterile NB medium (pH 7.2). Bacteria were allowed to grow at 35±2°C for 24 h in a 500 ml Erlenmeyer flask with working volume of 300 ml with agitation at 120 rpm on orbital shaking incubator (Remi CIS 24BL, India). Culture medium was then centrifuged at 5000 rpm to obtain cell-free supernatant [37].
Preparation and Characterization of AgNPs
To obtain AgNPs, 2 ml supernatant extracted from exponentially grown bacterial culture was added to 98 ml of 1 mM AgNO3 solution [38]. The reaction mixture was incubated in dark at room temperature. All steps in sequential manner are given in Figure 1.
Purification of AgNPs
Bacterial supernatant was used for the synthesis of AgNPs. Bio-reduction of silver was monitored by the UV-vis absorption spectra as a function of time of the reaction mixture. The synthesized particles were washed six times by centrifugation and redispersed in double distilled water to remove the remaining unconverted silver ions. They were transferred into a dialysis bag with the cutoff of 12 kDa. AgNPs were resuspended in 1 ml of HEPES buffer (20 mM, pH 7.4) supplemented with sucrose to reach a density of 2.5 g/ml. The solution was placed at the bottom of a centrifuge tube (15 ml). A 12 ml of a linear gradient of sucrose (0.25–1.0 M) density was layered on the nanoparticle suspension and subjected to centrifugation (10,000 rpm at 4°C for 4 h) and were collected for further characterization. The concentration of nanoparticle in solution was determined by ICP-AES (Liberty RL) [39].
UV- visible and Nanophox Spectra Analysis
The reduction of silver ions (Ag+) was carefully monitored by measuring the UV–visible spectrum of the reaction medium incubated overnight after diluting a small amount of aliquot prepared in double distilled water [40]. Since AgNPs are soluble in water, the change in colour was observed. A yellowish brown colour formation was noticed during the synthesis phase. The concentration of AgNPs produced was measured using a UV–vis spectrometer (Thermo Spectronic 20D+) between 250 and 600 nm wavelength, using 10-mm-optical-path-length quartz cuvettes. Further analyses of nanoparticles distribution and stability in solution were observed by the Nanophox particle size analyser [18].
FTIR Spectra Analysis
RXI FTIR spectrometer with KBr beamsplitter was used to ascertain the involvement of biological moieties in particle synthesis. In order to remove any free biomass residue, the residual solution after the reaction was centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 30 min and the resulting pellets was mixed in 20 ml sterile double distilled water and cyclomixed for 10 min on vortex mixer. Thereafter, the centrifugation and re-dispersing process was repeated three times. The FTIR spectra of AgNO3, bacterial biomass and AgNPs were recorded as a KBr pellet at a resolution of 4 cm−1 in the wave number region of 400–4000 cm−1 [41].
X-ray Diffraction and Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis
X-ray Diffraction analysis (XRD) was carried out using Rigaku Miniflex X-ray diffractometere with Cu-Kα radiations (λ = 0.15406 nm) in 2θ range from 20° to 80°. Furthermore, the morphology of the AgNPs was examined by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) on Hitachi SU6600. The sheet of the samples was prepared on a carbon coated copper grid by dropping a tiny amount of the sample and prior to measurements grids were allowed to dry at room temperature [42].
Release Kinetics of AgNPs
AgNPs were placed in a dialysis bag with a cut off 12 kDa. The bag was suspended in a HEPES buffer solution (20 ml, pH 7.4). A continuous release of AgNPs was measured over a period of 48 h. The release rate and order of kinetics were calculated. The concentration of silver released was determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometer (GBC, Australia), Briefly, the solution of AgNPs was processed at 100°C in concentrated nitric acid in an oil bath for 2 h for complete solvation and then the silver concentration was measured by Air/Acetylene Flame via using silver flame, Fuel flow rate 0.9 to 1.2 L/min and atomize temperature 1100°C [43]. The percentage of silver released was calculated using equation:
where Wc is the total silver content in the dialysis bag and Wt is the silver content in the buffer solution at a time.
Animal Model for Efficacy and Toxicity Studies
For acute toxicity tests, female BALB/c mice weighing 18±2 g and 8–10 weeks old were obtained from the animal house facility of Interdisciplinary Biotechnology Unit, A.M.U., Aligarh. The animals were fed a standard pellet diet and had access to water ad libitum. The techniques used for bleeding and injection were followed strictly in accordance with mandates approved by the Government of India animal ethics committee for the control and supervision of experiments on animals.
Cell Preparation
The spleen cells was isolated from mice and teased apart in RPMI 1640 medium. After centrifugation, the single cell suspension was treated with ACK-lysing buffer (8.29 g/L NH4Cl, 1 g/L KHCO2, 37.2 mg/L EDTA/2Na) to lyses red blood cells. After centrifugation, cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with antibiotic and antimycotic solution (Sigma) and 10% heat inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS; sigma). Cells were cultured in a 96-well flat-bottomed plates at well in 0.1 ml of culture medium for cell proliferation assay, and stimulated with AgNPs (0–500 µgml−1). Splenocytes were cultured for 24 h at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 and 95% air. Here, the used splenocytes were pre-activated by using 5 µg/ml of ConA for 48 h of incubation.
Determination of AgNP Uptake by HeLa Cells
The HeLa cell line was maintained in RPMI 1640 culture medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum. The cells were plated at a density of 104 cells on glass coverslips, and cultured for 24 h at 37°C. The cells were subsequently exposed to AgNPs. The plates were incubated for 1 h. Cells were fixed by 2% paraformaldehyde for 2 h followed by washing with HBSS. The fixed cells were observed under microscope.
MTT Assay on Splenocytes
The cytotoxicity of the AgNPs on murine splenocytes was determined by a previously reported method standardized in our laboratory [18]. After stimulation with AgNPs (0–500 µgml−1) for 24 h at 37°C, the splenocytes were centrifuged and washed twice with fresh RPMI 1640 medium and grown in 0.5 mgml−1 MTT (dissolved in PBS and filtered through a 0.2 mm membrane) at 37°C. After 4 h, the intracellular formazan crystals were dissolved in dimethylsulphoxide, and the absorption values were measured at 570 nm. The absorption values were expressed as the cell proliferation rate (%), according to the control group as 100%.
MTT Assay on HeLa Cell Lines
The HeLa cell line was maintained in RPMI 1640 culture medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum. The cells were plated at a density of 5×104 cells per well in a U-bottom 96-well plate, and cultured for 24 h at 37°C. The cells were subsequently exposed to various concentrations of AgNPs (0–500 µgml−1). The plates were incubated for 48 h, and cell proliferation was measured by adding 20 µL of MTT (thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide) dye (5 mg/ml in phosphate-buffered saline) per well. The plates were incubated for a further 4 h at 37°C in a humidified chamber containing 5% CO2. Formazan crystals formed due to reduction of dye by viable cells in each well were dissolved in 150 µL dimethyl sulfoxide, and absorbance was read at 570 nm. The absorption values were expressed as the cell proliferation rate (%), according to the control group as 100%.
Acute Toxicity Test for AgNPs
Hepatic toxicity was monitored by applying single dose regimen of 100 µg/ml to determine the biochemical profiles of serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) by respective detection kits (COGENT, Span Diagnostics Ltd., India). Blood was collected by retro orbital puncture from mice of two groups including (i) untreated and (ii) treated after 24 h. The blood was allowed to clot at room temperature and serum was separated. Aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase was determined in serum as per respective guidelines provided by the manufacturer.
RBC Lysis Test for AgNPs
In vitro erythrocyte lysis test was carried out as a preliminary toxicity test, which is assessed by measuring the hemoglobin released as a result of membrane leakage or disruption caused by exposure to low doses of the nanoparticles. Briefly, fresh blood obtained from a healthy rabbit was collected in anticoagulant solution (ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid) and centrifuged at 1000×g for 10 min at 4°C. Both Buffy coat and plasma were discarded. Washed erythrocytes were diluted with isotonic buffer (20 mM PBS) to prepare 50% hematocrit. Extent of hemolysis was studied by incubating the RBC suspension with various concentrations ranging from 100 to 300 µg/ml of AgNPs at 37°C for 1 h. The incubated solutions were centrifuged at 1500×g after 1 h and supernatant was collected and analyzed by ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy (λmax = 576 nm) for released hemoglobin. The percentage hemolysis was determined by the following equation:
where Abst is the absorbance of the supernatant from samples incubated with the particles, Absc is the absorbance of the supernatant from controls (normal saline), and Abs100% is the absorbance of the supernatant of controls incubated in the presence of 1% Triton® X-100, which causes complete lysis of RBCs (total lysis).
Antimicrobial Assay
The biofabricated AgNPs were tested for bactericidal activity by agar well-diffusion method against both Gram positive Staphylococcus aureus and Gram negative Escherichia coli and Serratia marcescens. The pure culture of each bacterium was sub-cultured in NB medium. Each bacterial strain was spread uniformly onto the individual plates by using sterile glass rod spreader. Wells of 8 mm diameter were punched into NA plates using gel puncture. By using a micropipette, nanoparticle (12.5, 25 and 50 µg) suspensions were poured into each well on all plates. Plates were then incubated at 35±2°C for 48 h and the level of zone of inhibition of bacterial growth was measured [44].
Results and Discussion
Characterization of Bacterial Strain
In the present study, Cr(VI) resistant bacterium was isolated from industrial effluents contaminated soil. Out of the 20 bacterial isolates, OS4 strain was selected especially due to its ability to tolerate high level of most toxic form of chromium and was characterized morphologically and biochemically (Table 1). Strain OS4 grew well on NA plates amended with 1200 µg K2Cr2O7/ml. The chromium resistant bacterial strain was found to be Gram-negative, rod shaped and produced green pigments on NA plates. The freshly grown cultures showed a positive reaction for citrate utilization, nitrate reduction, catalase, and could hydrolyze starch and gelatin, but were negative for other biochemical tests (Table 1). On the basis of the characteristics observed for strain OS4 and compared with those listed in Bergey`s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology [32], strain OS4 was presumptively identified as Stenotrophomonas spp. In order to further validate strain OS4 and to identify the bacterial species, it was subjected to 16S rDNA sequence analysis. The sequence of 16S rDNA of strain OS4 was submitted to Gen-Bank (entry code: JN247637). The information obtained by the BLAST program indicated a close genetic relatedness of strain OS4 with the rDNA sequence of S. maltophilia (16S: 99% similarity with the reference sequence HQ185400.1) in NCBI database. Such a higher identical value confirmed the strain OS4 to be Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. A phylogenetic tree constructed by MEGA4 software based on 16S rDNA partial sequence is presented in Figure 2. Microorganisms in general have been found to survive in metal contaminated environment [45] and this property of metal tolerance by microbes have been/being exploited well in the bioremediation strategies to clean up contaminated sites [46]. Some of the strategies adopted by bacterial populations to protect themselves from the nuisance of metal toxicity include- (i) restriction of metal entry in to the cell either by reduced uptake/active efflux or by the formation of complexes outside the cell (ii) avoidance and sequestrations and (iii) enzymatic reduction of free ions in the cytosol. Despite these mechanisms, the information on the impact of Cr(VI) on bacterial populations inhabiting contaminated environment is contradictory. As an example, the Gram positive Bacillus strains tolerated chromium up to the concentration of 500 (PSB1), 400 (PSB7), and 550 µg ml–1 (PSB10), respectively, when grown on chromium amended NA plates [45] while other Gram-positive bacterium Bacillus sphaericus isolated from serpentine soil could tolerate 800 µg ml−1 Cr (VI) [47]. The differential response of bacterial cells even within the same group is likely due to the variation in the compositions of medium used or variable growth conditions [48]. However, whatever have been the reasons; the bacterial strain isolated in this study exhibited a high level of tolerance to Cr(VI) which could be an advantage while using this strain under chromium stressed soils.
Table 1. Morphological and biochemical characteristics of Cr(VI) resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia OS4 strain.
Features | Specifications | Outcomes |
Appearance | Shape | Short Rod |
Pigments | + | |
Gram reaction | – | |
Biochemical reactions | Citrate utilization | + |
Indole | – | |
Methyl red | – | |
Nitrate reduction | + | |
Catalase | + | |
Oxidase | – | |
Voges Proskauer | – | |
Carbohydrate utilization | Glucose | + |
Mannitol | – | |
Sucrose | + | |
Hydrolysis | Starch | + |
Gelatin | + | |
Tolerance | Cr(VI) | 1,200 µg/ml |
Chromium Reduction Assay
The effect of pH on chromium reduction by exponentially grown bacterial strain OS4 was variable (Figure 3).The bacterial strain grew well at pH 7 and could remove hexvalent chromium maximally by 91% after 48 h growth. However, with increase or decrease in pH, there was a corresponding decrease in bacterial growth which subsequently affected the reduction of Cr(VI) very negatively (Figure 3). For example, a maximum decrease (100%) in chromium reduction by strain OS4 was observed at pH 2 compared to those recorded at pH 7. In a similar study, Wani et al. [45] have also observed a variable effect of pH on chromium reduction by Bacillus spp. grown in NB treated differently with varying concentrations of Cr(VI). The chromium reducing ability of strain OS4 thus suggests that this strain might have enzyme chromium reductase which possibly led to the reduction of chromium, as also reported by Farrel and Ronallo [49].
Characterization of Biofabricated AgNPs
The colour of reaction mixture changed from colourless to yellowish brown in 30 min when the supernatant prepared from strain OS4 was added to solution of AgNO3. The intensity of colour further increased with increasing incubation periods. Formation of AgNPs using AgNO3 solution was confirmed by UV–visible spectral analysis. In the UV–visible absorption spectrum, there was lack of any characteristic peak of nanoparticle for AgNO3 in aqueous solution and AgNO3 in NB media while a strong and broad peak located at about 428 nm was observed for the synthesized AgNPs (Figure 4). Such type of UV-visible peak is in accordance to other previously reported various metal nanoparticles of 6 to 100 nm size [50], [51]. To check the effect of time on the synthesis of AgNPs we recorded time dependent UV-visible absorption spectra and plotted the absorbance intensity at 428 nm against time (min) to characterize the kinetics of AgNP formation (Figure 5). We found that within 2 h saturation was achieved. Furthermore, to check the size and stability of AgNPs in suspension, the particle size analyzer was also used. The size of colloidal AgNPs from particle size distribution curve was found to be 93 nm (Figure 6) which were in good agreement with the data observed under XRD, UV-visible spectroscopy and FESEM studies. The XRD analysis confirms the formation of single phase cubic AgNPs (Figure 7). All the peaks matched well with the standard JCPDS card No. 04-0783 of cubic AgNPs (Figure 8). Average particle size calculated from XRD data was found to be ∼93 nm which correlated well with the results obtained by particle size analyzer. Furthermore, the FESEM image of the synthesized AgNPs (Figure 9), validates the formation of cubic nanoparticles capped with its bio-moieties. This indicates the reduction of Ag+ to elemental silver (Ag). In other words, the UV-vis spectra show SPR for AgNPs at 428 nm and the cubical images observed in this study for NPs through SEM was in agreement to those reported earlier [51], [52]. Moreover, the synthesized nanoparticles were stable in solution over a time period of three months time at room temperature.
Biofabrication of AgNPs by the bacterial supernatant depends on the biological functional groups present on the bacterial surface. Hence, in order to understand better the kind of information about the functional groups involved in the capping or reduction process, FTIR analysis of the AgNPs in the range of 1000–4000 cm−1 was performed (Figure 9). The bands characterization including hydroxyl and amine group peaks were assigned at 3376 cm−1, alkyl and CHO had a broad band ranging between 2967–2851 cm−1, C = O of amide groups at 1644 cm−1, COO− of the carboxylate groups appeared at 1584 and 1544 cm−1, the band located at 1238, 1398 and 1740 cm−1 represented COO− anions where as those located at 726 cm−1 was assigned SO3 − groups. The IR spectra revealed the role of proteins and enzymes involved in capping and reduction of Ag+ in the formation of nanoparticles similar to the earlier report of Kumar and Mamidyala [53]. The band at 1650 cm−1 arises due to carbonyl stretch and -NH stretch vibrations in the amide linkages, clearly indicating the presence of protein/peptide on the surface that appears to be acting as a capping/stabilizing agent [54], [55].
As AgNPs itself have unique antibacterial activities due to generation of free radicals in bacterial membrane and cause toxicity in bacterial cell, they were not used as a drug loading like liposome particles or other peptide particles.
To check the short- and long-term storage stability of AgNPs, the biosynthesized AgNPs were stored in the dark at 4°C and 25°C temperatures. The UV-vis spectra and particle size were recorded continuously for 2 h (Figure 4) and after three months. It was found that there was no change in the particle size distribution and absorbance spectra with time suggesting that the size of AgNPs were stable with the course of time.
Kinetics of AgNP Release
The release kinetics of biosynthesized AgNps when placed in a dialysis bag and released into the medium through dialysis membrane is shown in the Figure 10 [56]. The measurement of sample was conducted using atomic absorption due to the low concentration of silver released in the early stages of the experiments. The method was very sensitive to recognizing the low concentration of the silver released especially at initial stage of the experiment. Continuous release of silver was observed over the period of the study (48 h). The rate of dissolution and the concentration of silver was obeying the zero order kinetics with r2>0.96. In accordance to the previous reports as observed with other drugs [57], the AgNPs that are released in to the medium are expressed as cumulative drug released % versus time (h). Throughout the course of the experiment, ∼81±3.7% of the AgNPs was released. This rapid release was correlated with the particle size and increasing surface area of the AgNPs. Therefore, the small sized nanoparticles showed a more rapid release kinetics than the bigger sized nanoparticles probably due to higher diffusability of the small particles.
Cellular uptake by HeLa Cells and Cytotoxic Potential of AgNPs
The uptake of in-house prepared AgNPs was assessed for HeLa cells. The incubation of HeLa cells with AgNPs resulted in nanoparticle uptake by endocytosis which mainly appeared in the aggregated form within the cells (Figure 11 A and B).
The cytotoxic potential of the synthesized AgNPs against HeLa cells and swiss mice splenocytes was assessed by determining the number of viable cells surviving after incubation with the AgNPs for the stipulated time period using the MTT method [18]. In other words, MTT assay was used to determine the differential cytotoxicity of AgNPs against both cell line and splenocytes. The cytotoxicity assay suggests a variable cytotoxicity of AgNPs for HeLa cells and splenocytes. AgNPs were found to be significantly more toxic to HeLa cells as compared to mouse splenocytes which can be attributed to the intrinsic anticancer property of AgNPs (Figure 11C).
In vitro and in vivo Toxicity of AgNPs
We also evaluated the intrinsic toxicity of the generated AgNPs in vitro as well as in vivo. The test particles induced significantly less hemolysis as compared to control (1% Triton®X-100) which was ascertained when a 300 µg/ml solution of nanoparticles rendered merely 13% RBC hemolysis (Figure 12A). In another set of experiments, AgNPs administered animals were analyzed for liver function test parameters to evaluate in vivo toxicity. As shown in Figure 12B, animals which were given AgNPs had marginally higher levels of marker enzymes, AST and ALT, than untreated control animals. The results obtained here thus consolidated the facts that the in-house prepared AgNPs did not show any in vitro toxicity and even the in vivo toxicity was highly insignificant and hence such particles are safe to use in drug formulation.
Antimicrobial Activity
After characterization, the newly synthesized AgNPs were tested for their antibacterial activity. Interestingly, different concentrations of the biofabricated AgNPs exhibited significant antibacterial activity against both Gram-negative (S. marcescens and E. coli) and Gram-positive (S. aureus) bacteria grown in NA medium. The antibacterial activity expressed in terms of zone of inhibition was quite visible on NA plates (Figure 13). Generally, the antibacterial activity of AgNPs increased considerably with corresponding increase in concentrations ranging from 12.5 µg to 50 µg per well. At these concentrations, the growth of bacterial strains namely E. coli, S. aureus and S. marcescens was declined significantly by 91, 69 and 66%, respectively (Figure 14). Upon loading of 50 µg AgNPs into 8 mm agar well, a maximum zone of inhibition was recorded for S. marcescens (25 mm), E. coli (23 mm) and S. aureus (22 mm). The bactericidal property of the nanoparticles suggested that these particles were more diffusible in the growth medium which in turn allowed greater interaction between bacterial cells and each nanoparticle. Similar bactericidal impact of some other Ag+ on microbial communities is known. For example, in many cases it has been proposed that ionic silver strongly interacts with thiol groups of vital enzymes and inactivates them. Also, there are evidences suggesting that DNA replication is halted when bacterial cells are exposed to Ag+ [58]. Even-though, we could not pinpoint the exact site where nanoparticles could affect the bacterial cells but it was very clear that Gram negative bacterial strains were most susceptible to nanoparticles [59].
Conclusion
Due to chrome leather tanning processes, large quantities of chromium compounds are discharged through liquid, solid, and gaseous wastes into the environment and can have significant adverse biological and ecological effects. Conversion of Cr(VI) into less toxic Cr(III) is the main bioremediation strategy to overcome the chromium pollution. In this study, isolated and well characterized bacterial culture S. maltophilia exhibited chromium reducing ability that could help in cleanup of chromium contaminated environment. Furthermore, the culture supernatant of S. maltophilia strain OS4 was used for synthesis of AgNPs at room temperature using AgNO3. Since chromium reduction is the specific property of this strain, it is proposed that the reduction of Ag+ might be due to the protein component contributed by the enzyme reductase. It was confirmed that the AgNPs formed were cuboidal in shape, crystalline in nature with anionic particle surface. The AgNPs generated here also showed a promising antimicrobial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. On the contrary, AgNPs were found to be non-toxic in various cytotoxic assays. Thus, the bacterial strain OS4 used in this study is likely to provide broad spectrum benefits such as: (i) it may be helpful in curing chromium polluted sites; (ii) it could be used to generate biofabricated AgNPs and (iii) it could be effective in the execution of infectious diseases.
Acknowledgments
The authors are highly thankful to Mr. Aurangzeb Khan from CIF-Department of Chemistry for FTIR data acquisition and Mr. Arshad from CEMS-DAP AMU, Aligarh for assisting in Nanophox experiments. Facilities provided by AMU, Aligarh are gratefully acknowledged.
Funding Statement
Financial assistance was provided to M. Oves and E. Ahmad in the form of a Senior Research Fellowship and Research Associateship, respectively, was supported by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, India. M.S. Khan, A. Zaidi and A. Azam are Associate Professors in A.M.U., Aligarh. No additional external funding was received for this study. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Tarcan G, Akinci G, Danisman AM (2010) Assessment of the pollution from tannery effluents upon waters and soils in and around Kula vicinity, Turkey. Water Air Soil Pollut 213: 199–210. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Khan MS, Zaidi A, Wani PA (2012) Chromium plant Chromium–Plant-GrowthPromoting Rhizobacteria Interactions: Toxicity and Management. In: Toxicity of Heavy Metals to Legumes and Bioremediatmion. Zaidi A, Wani PA, Khan MS (Editors), Springer-Verlag/Wien. pp. 67–88.
- 3. Khan MS, Zaidi A, Wani PA, Oves M (2009) Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in the remediation of metal contaminated soils. Environ Chem Lett 7: 1–19. [Google Scholar]
- 4. Chai L, Huang S, Yang Z, Peng B, Huang Y, et al. (2009) Cr (VI) remediation by indigenous bacteria in soils contaminated by chromium containing slag. J Hazard Mater 167: 516–522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Fulladosa E, Desjardin V, Murat JC, Gourdon R, Villaescusa I (2006) Cr (VI) reduction into Cr (III) as a mechanism to explain the low sensitivity of Vibrio scheri bioassay to detect chromium pollution. Chemosphere 65: 644–650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Guha H, Jayachandran K, Maurrasse F (2003) Microbiological reduction of chromium (VI) in presence of pyrolusite-coated sand by Shewanella alga Simidu ATCC 55627 in laboratory column experiments. Chemosphere 52: 175–183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Srivastava S, Thakur IS (2006) Evaluation of bioremediation and detoxication potentiality of Aspergillus niger for removal of hexavalent chromium in soil microcosm. Soil Biol Biochem 38: 1904–1911. [Google Scholar]
- 8. Gericke M, Pinches A (2006) Biological synthesis of metal nanoparticles. Hydrometallurgy 83: 132–140. [Google Scholar]
- 9. Tao AR, Habas S, Yang P (2008) Shape control of colloidal metal nanocrystals. Small 4: 310–325. [Google Scholar]
- 10. EI-Sayed MA (2001) Some interesting properties of metals confined in time and nanometer space of different shapes. Acc Chem Res 34: 257–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Yu DG (2007) Formation of colloidal silver nanoparticles stabilized by Na+–poly (γ-glutamic acid)–silver nitrate complex via chemical reduction process. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 59: 171–178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Mallick K, Witcomb MJ, Scurrella MS (2005) Self-assembly of silver nanoparticles in a polymer solvent: formation of a nanochain through nanoscale soldering. Mater Chem Phys 90: 221–224. [Google Scholar]
- 13. Smetana AB, Klabunde KJ, Sorensen CM (2005) Synthesis of spherical silver nanoparticles by digestive ripening, stabilization with various agents, and their 3-D and 2-D superlattice formation. J Colloid Interface Sci 284: 521–526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Cui H, Guo JZ, Li N, Liu LJ (2008) Gold nanoparticle triggered chemilumineseence between luminol and AgNO3 . J Phys Chem C 112: 11319–11323. [Google Scholar]
- 15. Baker C, Pradhan A, Pakstis L, Pochan DJ, Shah SI (2005) Synthesis and antibacterial properties of silver nanoparticles. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 5: 244–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Simon-Deckers A, Loo S, Mayne-L’hermite M, Herlin-Boime N, Menguy N, et al. (2009) Size-, composition- and shape-dependent toxicological impact of metal oxide nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes toward bacteria. Environ Sci Technol 43: 8423–8429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Zhao J, Zhang XY, Yonzon CR, Haes AJ, vanDuyne RP (2006) Localized surface plasmon resonance biosensors. Nanomedicine 1: 219–228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Chauhan A, Zubair S, Tufail S, Sherwani A, Sajid M, et al. (2011) Fungus-mediated biological synthesis of gold nanoparticles: potential in detection of liver cancer. Int J Nanomed 6: 2305–2319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Padmadhas R, Ragunathan R (2009) Effect of lead nano particle present in the leaf of Calotrphis Gigantea which result in the loss of the painted grass hoppe of the Western ghats species in India. Int J Nanotechnol 3: 89–96. [Google Scholar]
- 20. Mourato A, Gadanho M, Lino AR, Tenreiro R (2011) Biosynthesis of crystalline silver and gold nanoparticles by extremophilic yeasts. Bioinorg Chem Appl 2011: 546074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Ramachandran KC, Mohan RK, Kalaichelvan PT (2012) Optimization for rapid synthesis of silver nanoparticles and its effect on phytopathogenic fungi. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectros 93: 95–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Kumar CG, Mamidyala SK (2011) Extracellular synthesis of silver nanoparticles using culture supernatant of Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 84: 462–466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Jacob SJ, Finub JS, Narayanan A (2012) Synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Piper longum leaf extracts and its cytotoxic activity against Hep-2 cell line. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 1: 212–214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Ahmad A, Mukherjee P, Senapati, Mandal S, Khan D, et al. (2003) Extracellular biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using the fungus Fusarium oxysporum . Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 28: 313–318. [Google Scholar]
- 25. Gade AK, Bonde P, Ingle AP, Marcato PD, Duran, et al (2008) Exploitation of Aspergillus niger for synthesis of silver nanoparticles. J Biobased Mater Bioenergy 2: 243–247. [Google Scholar]
- 26. Shahverdi AR, Minaeian S, Shahverdi HR, Jamalifar H, Nohi AA (2007) Rapid synthesis of silver nanoparticles using culture supernatants of Enterobacteria: A novel biological approach. Process Biochem 42: 919–923. [Google Scholar]
- 27. Klaus T, Joerger R, Olsson E, Granqvist CG (1999) Silver-based crystalline nanoparticles, microbially fabricated. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 13611–13614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Kalishwaralal K, Deepak V, Ramkumarpandian S, Nellaiah H, Sangiliyandi G (2008) Extracellular biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles by the culture supernatant of Bacillus licheniformis. . Mater Lett 62: 4411–4413. [Google Scholar]
- 29. Law N, Ansari S, Livens FR, Renshaw JC, Lloyd JR (2008) Formation of Nanoscale Elemental Silver Particles via Enzymatic Reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens . Appl Environ Microbiol 4: 7090–7093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Kumar SA, Abyaneh MK, Gosavi SW, Kulkarni SK, Ahmad A, et al. (2007) Sulfite reductase-mediated synthesis of gold nanoparticles capped with phytochelatin. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 47: 191–195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Kalimuthu K, Babu RS, Venkataraman D, Mohd B, Gurunathan S (2008) Biosynthesis of silvernanocrystals by Bacillus licheniformis . Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 65: 150–153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Holt JG, Krieg NR, Sneath PHA, Staley JT, Williams ST (1994) Bergey`s Manual of determinative Bacteriology. 9th edn. Williams and Wilkins, Lippincott, 307–308 p.
- 33. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbour-joining method: a new method for constructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4: 406–425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Kumar S, Nei M, Dudley J, Tamura K (2008) MEGA: A biologist-centric software for evolutionary analysis of DNA and protein sequences. Brief Bioinfo 9: 299–306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.APHA (1995) Standard methods. 19th Edition. American Public Health Association, Washington DC.
- 36. Park CH, Keyhan M, Wielinga B, Fendorf S, Matin A (2000) Purification to homogeneity and characterization of a novel Pseudomonas putida chromate reductase. Appl Environ Microbiol 66: 1788–1795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Wei X, Luo M, Li W, Yang L, Liang X, et al. (2012) Synthesis of silver nanoparticles by solar irradiation of cell-free Bacillus amyloliquefaciens extracts and AgNO3 . Bioresource Technol 103: 273–278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Priyadarshini S, Gopinath V, Priyadharsshini NM, Ali MD, Velusamy P (2012) Synthesis of anisotropic silver nanoparticles using novel strain, Bacillus flexus and its biomedical application. Colloids Surf B Biointer102: 232–237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Vasimalai N, Sheeba G, John SA (2012) Ultrasensitive fluorescence-quenched chemosensor for Hg(II) in aqueous solution based on mercaptothiadiazole capped silvernanoparticles. J Hazard Mater 213–214: 193–199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Loo YY, Chieng BW, Nishibuchi M, Radu S (2012) Synthesis of silver nanoparticles by using tea leaf extract from Camellia sinensis. . Int J Nanomedicine 7: 4263–4267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Bryaskova R, Pencheva D, Nikolov S, Kantardjiev T (2011) Synthesis and comparative study on the antimicrobial activity of hybrid materials based on silver nanoparticles (AgNps) stabilized by polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP). J Chem Biol 4: 185–191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Kumar A, Singhal A (2009) Synthesis of colloidal silver iron oxide nanoparticles–study of their optical and magnetic behaviour. Nanotechnology 20: 295606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Dash S, Murthy PN, Nath L, Chowdhury P (2010) Kinetic modeling on drug release from controlled drug delivery systems. Acta Pol Pharm 67: 217–223. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Azam A, Ahmed AS, Oves M, Khan MS, Adnan M (2012) Size-dependent antimicrobial properties of CuO nanoparticles against Gram-positive and -negative bacterial strains. International Journal of Nanomedicine 7: 3527–3535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Wani PA, Khan MS, Zaidi A (2007) Chromium Reduction, Plant Growth–Promoting Potentials, and Metal Solubilizatrion by Bacillus sp. Isolated from Alluvial Soil. Curr Microbiol 54: 237–243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ahemad M, Khan MS (2011) Pesticide interaction with soil microflora: Importance in bioremediation. In: Ahmad I, Ahmad F, Pichtel J editors. Microbes and Microbial Technology: Agricultural and Environmental Applications: Springer New York. pp. 393–414.
- 47. Wang P, Mori T, Toda K, Ohtake H (1990) Membrane associated chromate reductase activity from Enterobacter cloacae . J Bacteriol 172: 1670–1672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Rajkumar M, Nagendran R, Lee KJ, Lee WH (2005) Characterization of a novel Cr (vi) reducing Pseudomonas spp. with plant growth promoting potential. Curr Microbiol 50: 266–271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Farrel SO, Ronallo RT (2000) Experiments in Biochemistry, A Hands-on Approach, Saunders College Publ, Orlando, FL.
- 50. Shivaji S, Madhu S, Singh S (2011) Extracellular synthesis of antibacterial silver nanoparticles using psychrophilic bacteria. Process Biochem 46: 1800–1807. [Google Scholar]
- 51. Thangapandiyan S, Prema P (2012) Chemically fabricated silver nanoparticles enhances the activity of antibiotics against selected human bacterial pathogens. Int J Pharm Sci Res 3: 1415–1422. [Google Scholar]
- 52. Mouxing F, Qingbio L, Daohua S, Yinghua L, Ning H, et al. (2006) rapid preparation 9process of silver nanoparticles by bioreduction and their characterization. Chinese J Chem Eng 14: 114–117. [Google Scholar]
- 53. Kumar CG, Mamidyala SK (2011) Extracellular synthesis of silver nanoparticles using culture supernatant of Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 84: 462–466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Kumar SA, Abyaneh MK, Gosavi SW, Kulkarni SK, Pasricha R, et al. (2007) Nitrate reductase-mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles from AgNO3 . Biotechnol Lett 29: 439–445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Parikh RY, Singh S, Prasad BLV, Patole MS, Sastry M, et al. (2008) Extracellular synthesis of crystalline silver nanoparticles and molecular evidence of silver resistance from Morganella sp.: Towards understanding biochemical synthesis mechanism. ChemBioChem 9: 1415–1422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Yerushalmi N, Margalit R (1994) Physicochemical evaluation of a stability-driven approach to drug entrapment in regular and in surface-modified liposomes. Biochem Biophys Acta 1189: 13–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Lichtenstein A, Margalit R (1995) Liposome-encapsulated silver sulfadiazine (SSD) for the topical treatment of infected burns: Thermodynamics of drug encapsulation and kinetics of drug release. J Inorg Biochem 60: 187–198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Yang W, Shen C, Ji Q, An H, Wang J, et al. (2009) Food storage material silver nanoparticles interfere with DNA replication fidelity and bind with DNA. Nanotechnology 20: 085102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Singh S, Patel P, Jaiswal S, Prabhune AA, Ramana CV, et al. (2009) A direct method for the preparation of glycolipid-metal nanoparticle conjugates: sophorolipids as reducing and capping agents for the synthesis of water re-dispersible silver nanoparticles and their antibacterial activity, New J Chem. 33: 646–652. [Google Scholar]