Skip to main content
Journal of Cheminformatics logoLink to Journal of Cheminformatics
. 2013 Mar 22;5(Suppl 1):P15. doi: 10.1186/1758-2946-5-S1-P15

Annotating targets with pathways: extending approaches to mode of action analysis

Sonia Liggi 1, Alexios Koutsoukas 1, Yasaman Kalantar Motamedi 1, Robert C Glen 1, Andreas Bender 1,
PMCID: PMC3606261

When attempting to treat pathological conditions, it is often necessary to act on multiple targets in order to modify the implicated biological network(s). A systems biology approach would help the drug discovery field by providing a link between chemistry and biology [1]. In particular, annotation of targets with pathways would allow a better understanding of a drug mechanism of action, side effects [2] and promiscuity [3], as well as complex network modulation [4]. A deep understanding of these factors is fundamental to design a drug with the desired pharmacological profile against multiple targets and, to the extent possible, to avoid side effects.

In this context, a cheminformatics target prediction tool [5] was used on several small molecule phenotypic datasets (such as cytotoxicity), and the predicted targets were annotated with the pathways they belong to. Predicted targets and annotated pathways were subjected to an enrichment calculation in order to eliminate the prediction noise and highlight only those likely to be implicated in the phenotype studied. Several enrichment methods were tested and compared, leading to the conclusion that there is not a single method that stands out, but instead the combination of several methods is needed to increase the significance of the readouts.

This protocol allowed us to highlight pathways implicated in the analysed phenotypes which would not be identified by considering only predicted targets, hence giving further insight into the mechanism of expression of the observed phenotype.

References

  1. Hood L. et al. The impact of systems approaches on biological problems in drug discovery. Nature Biotechnol. 2004;22:1215–1217. doi: 10.1038/nbt1004-1215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Scheiber J. et al. Gaining insight into off- target mediated effects of drug candidates with a comprehensive systems chemical biology analysis. J Chem Inf Model. 2009;49:308–317. doi: 10.1021/ci800344p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hettne K. et al. Connecting small molecules to nuclear receptor pathways. Curr Top Med Chem. 2007;7:1530–1536. doi: 10.2174/156802607782194671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Xie L. et al. Drug discovery using chemical systems biology: identification of the protein- ligand binding network to explain the side effects of CETP inhibitors. PLoS Computational Biology. 2009;5:e1000387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Koutsoukas A, In silico target predictions: comparing multiclass Naïve Bayes and Parzen-Rosenblatt Window and the definition of a benchmarking dataset for target prediction. In preparation. [DOI] [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Cheminformatics are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES