Abstract
Non-healing skin ulcers are often resistant to most common therapies. Treatment with growth factors has been demonstrated to improve closure of chronic wounds. Here we investigate whether lyophilized culture supernatant of freshly isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) is able to enhance wound healing. PBMC from healthy human individuals were prepared and cultured for 24 hours. Supernatants were collected, dialyzed and lyophilized (SECPBMC). Six mm punch biopsy wounds were set on the backs of C57BL/6J-mice and SECPBMC containing emulsion or controls were applied daily for three days. Morphology and neo-angiogenesis were analyzed by H&E-staining and CD31 immuno-staining, respectively. In vitro effects on diverse skin cells were investigated by migration assays, cell cycle analysis, and tube formation assay. Signaling pathways were analyzed by Western blot analysis. Application of SECPBMC on 6 mm punch biopsy wounds significantly enhanced wound closure. H&E staining of the wounds after 6 days revealed that wound healing was more advanced after application of SECPBMC containing emulsion. Furthermore, there was a massive increase in CD31 positive cells, indicating enhanced neo-angiogenesis. In primary human fibroblasts (FB) and keratinocytes (KC) migration but not proliferation was induced. In endothelial cells (EC) SECPBMC induced proliferation and tube-formation in a matrigel-assay. In addition, SECPBMC treatment of skin cells led to the induction of multiple signaling pathways involved in cell migration, proliferation and survival. In summary, we could show that emulsions containing the secretome of PBMC derived from healthy individuals accelerates wound healing in a mouse model and induce wound healing associated mechanisms in human primary skin cells. The formulation and use of such emulsions might therefore represent a possible novel option for the treatment of non-healing skin ulcers.
Introduction
The skin is the largest organ of the human body. It covers and protects the underlying organs from ultraviolet radiation, mechanical and chemical damage, invading microorganisms and excessive water loss [1]. Due to this essential function, skin wounds need to be efficiently repaired within a very short time frame. Optimum healing of cutaneous wounds requires a well-orchestrated integration of complex biological and molecular events, including cell migration and proliferation, extracellular matrix deposition and remodeling as well as neo-angiogenesis [2]–[4]. Unfortunately, adequate healing of skin wounds, in particular in the elderly population or in diabetic patients, is often impaired, leading to increased morbidity [5]. The seminal work by Holzinger et al. has shown that autologous transplantation of mononuclear cells effectively initiates and improves granulation and epithelialization of skin ulcers [6]. In addition, topic application of a mixture of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) together with basic fibroblast growth factor also resulted in a dramatic improvement in the treatment of a diabetic gangrene [7]. Several reports showed that transplantation of stem cells accelerates wound re-epithelialization and neovascularization in various models [8]–[10]. Recently, it has been demonstrated that the efficacy of a stem cell based therapy is dependent on soluble factors produced by these cells, since the secretome of stem cell cultures is sufficient to accelerate cutaneous wound healing [11]–[13].
The idea of using conditioned medium as a therapeutic agent evolved in the field of stem cell research and originated from cell based therapy of myocardial infarction. Many of the regenerative effects seen after administration of stem cells were shown to be rather mediated via a paracrine signaling than by direct cellular interactions [14], [15]. Conditioned culture medium, containing the secretome of mesenchymal stem cells, is rich in angiogenic and chemotactic factors [16], [17]. In addition, first evidence emerges that stem cell conditioned medium has immunosuppressive properties [18], [19]. We have previously shown that infusion of cultured irradiated apoptotic PBMC suspensions in a rat acute myocardial infarction (AMI) model restored long-term cardiac function [20], [21]. In a further study, we demonstrated that the regenerative function of these cells was solely mediated via soluble factors produced by the cells [22]. These highly active culture supernatants not only showed positive effects in a rodent and porcine AMI model, but also displayed cytoprotective functions on human primary cardiomyocytes [22].
Based on these beneficial pathophysiological concepts we speculated whether an emulsion containing lyophilized culture supernatants of freshly isolated unstimulated PBMC (SECPBMC) is able to enhance skin wound healing in a mouse model in vivo and whether it is able to activate wound healing associated mechanisms in primary human skin cells in vitro.
Methods
Ethics statement
Animal experiments were approved by the committee for animal research, Medical University of Vienna (vote: 66.009/0108-II/10b/2009).
Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were obtained from young healthy volunteers. The study was approved by the local ethics committee (Medical University of Vienna, vote: EK-Nr 2010/034), and informed written consent was obtained from all volunteers.
Mice
C57BL/6J mice were purchased (Taconic, Ry, Denmark) and kept at the Division of Biomedical Research at the Medical University of Vienna. Three months old mice were used for the wounding experiments.
Wounding protocol
Mice were anesthetized using Ketalar/Rompun solution intraperitoneally (50 mg Ketalar and 16 mg Rompun per kg body weight) and placed on a heating plate prior to surgery. One six mm full-thickness punch biopsy wound was set on the back of each mouse by folding the back skin and punching through 2 thicknesses of skin. Wounds were immediately treated with emulsions containing SECPBMC, lyophilized medium or physiological NaCl-solution (15 mice per group). Wounds were left uncovered and emulsions were applied once a day for 3 consecutive days. Wound area was measured in two dimensions with handyman's calipers for the first 3 days until a crust was formed and photographed at the beginning and the end of the experiment. Mice were sacrificed on day 7 and wounds were analyzed with regard to their morphology by Hematoxylin-Eosin (H&E)-staining, and the expression of Ki67 and CD31 was analyzed by specific immuno-stainings.
Cell culture
Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from young healthy volunteers were cultured in serum-free UltraCulture Medium (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland). Human dermal Fibroblasts (FB, Lonza) were cultured in DMEM (Gibco BRL, Gaithersburg, USA) medium, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, PAA, Linz, Austria), 25 mM L-glutamine (Gibco) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco). Human primary Keratinocytes (KC) were cultured in KC-growth medium (KGM, Lonza). Endothelial cells (EC) were cultured in EC-growth medium (EGM2 MV, Lonza). All cells were cultured at 37°C, 5% CO2 and at 95% relative humidity.
Generation of lyophilized cell culture supernatant derived from PBMC (SECPBMC)
Fifty ml of venous blood were drawn from 10 healthy volunteers. PBMC were separated by Ficoll-Paque (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB, Stockholm, Sweden) density gradient centrifugation. Cells were washed twice with PBS (Gibco), resuspended in serum-free UltraCulture Medium (Lonza) and cultured for 24 h at a cell density of 2.5×106 cells per ml. After 24 h supernatants were collected by spinning cell-suspensions at 500 g. All supernatants were pooled and dialyzed against ammonium acetate (50 mM, Sigma, Vienna, Austria) for 24 h at 4°C. For dialysis a cut-off of 6–8 kDa of the dialysis-membranes (Spectrum Medical Industries Inc., Los Angeles, CA, USA) was used. The obtained liquid was sterile filtered (Whatman Filter 0.22 µm, Dassel, Germany), frozen at −80°C and lyophilized overnight (Lyophilizator Christ alpha 1–4, Martin Christ Gefriertrocknungsanlagen GmbH, Osterode am Harz, Germany). Lyophilization was performed at −20°C and a pressure of 0.1 mbar. The so obtained powder was reconstituted with the respective media for in vitro use or further processed to generate an emulsion for in vivo applications.
Preparation of SECPBMC emulsions
Lyophilized SECPBMC was resolved in physiological NaCl-solution (Braun, Melsungen, Germany) to obtain a solution corresponding to an equivalent of the secretome from 2.5×107 cells per ml. As control we used lyophilized UltraCulture medium resolved in physiological NaCl-solution and physiological NaCl-solution alone. One part of the solutions was mixed with one part of a hydrophilic cream base (Ultrasicc®). 100 µl of these emulsions (containing SECPBMC of 1.25×106 PBMC) were applied to one skin wound per day for the first 3 days. Initially we performed the experiments with the dose used mentioned above and a lower dose (1/5). In this pre-experiment we found similar effects with the higher dose, but the lower dose was not effective. The frequency of application of the emulsion was chosen in agreement with our veterinary.
Antibodies
All antibodies used are listed in Table 1.
Table 1. List of Antibodies.
Antigen | Company | No. | Dilution | |
Western blot | Immuno-staining | |||
CD31 | BD Biosciences1 | 553710 | n.d. | 1∶50 |
Ki67 | Novus Biologicals2 | NB500-170 | n.d. | 1∶50 |
Ki67 | Abcam3 | AB15580 | n.d. | 1∶1000 |
c-Jun | NEB4 | 9165 | 1∶100 | n.d. |
phospho-c-Jun | NEB4 | 9261 | 1∶100 | n.d. |
CREB | NEB4 | 9197 | 1∶100 | n.d. |
phospho-CREB | NEB4 | 9198 | 1∶100 | n.d. |
Akt | NEB4 | 2938 | 1∶100 | n.d. |
phospho-Akt | NEB4 | 9271 | 1∶100 | n.d. |
Erk1/2 | NEB4 | 4695 | 1∶100 | n.d. |
phospho-Erk1/2 | NEB4 | 4376 | 1∶100 | n.d. |
Hsp27 | NEB4 | 2402 | 1∶100 | n.d. |
phospho-Hsp27 | NEB4 | 2404 | 1∶100 | n.d. |
GAPDH | HyTest5 | 5G4 | 1∶2000 | n.d. |
mouse IgG HRP | Amersham6 | NA931V | 1∶10000 | n.d. |
rabbit IgG HRP | Thermo Fisher7 | 31460 | 1∶10000 | n.d. |
rabbit Fluor546 | Alexa8 | A-11035 | n.d. | 1∶500 |
rat igG HRP | Amersham6 | NA9350 | n.d. | 1∶500 |
Company addresses:
Bedford, MA, USA; 2Littleton, CO, USA; 3Cambridge, UK; 4NEB: New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA, USA; 5Turku Finland; 6Buckinghamshire, UK; 7Rockford, IL, USA; 8Eugene, OR, USA. n.d.: not done.
Histochemistry and immunohistochemistry
For analyses, the complete wounds including 2 mm of the epithelial margins were excised, bisected and immediately processed. Skin wounds were either fixed in 4% formalin overnight and embedded in paraffin, or immediately embedded in optimal cutting temperature compound (TissueTek, Sakura Finetek, Zoeterwoude, The Netherlands), snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until further processing. H&E-staining was done on 5 µm thick paraffin sections.
Staining of paraffin-sections
Ki67 staining was performed on paraffin embedded tissues after antigen retrieval by boiling in a microwave for 5 minutes in citrate-buffer (pH = 6, Dakocytomation, Glostrup, Denmark). Non-specific staining was blocked by incubation with 10% normal goat serum for 1 h. The slides were subsequently incubated overnight in a humidified chamber at 4°C with either a Ki67 antibody or isotype-matched control antibodies (Table 1) diluted in PBS containing 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 10% goat serum. To visualize Ki67, sections were incubated with a rabbit Fluor546 antibody (Alexa) for 60 min. After washing nuclei were stained with Hoechst (Dakocytomation) and the slides were mounted with Fluoprep (bioMerieux, Marcy l′Etoile, France).
Staining of cryo-sections
CD31 immunostaining was performed on 10 µm thick sections of frozen tissues after fixation in aceton/methanol (1∶1) for 10 min. The staining was performed as described for paraffin-sections without boiling in a microwave. The CD31 antibody and the second step antibody used are listed in Table 1. After washing with PBS, slides were incubated sequentially with an HRP-linked second step antibody in PBS containing 2% BSA and 10% normal goat serum for 1 h, followed by incubation with DAB Chromogen tablets (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA). After washing, nuclear staining was performed by incubation with hematoxylin for 10 sec. Slides were mounted with Fluoprep (bioMérieux).
In vitro scratch assay
3×105 FB and KC were seeded in 6-well plates. After reaching 100% confluence, cells were washed twice with PBS and scratched using a pipette-tip. The resulting scratch was investigated under the microscope and the area for photographs was marked using a pen on the bottom of the well. Immediately after scratching, the first photograph was taken (initial wound size) exactly at the marked area. Lyophilized SECPBMC (2.5×106 per ml) as well as lyophilized medium were resolved in the respective medium without additional growth factors and added to the scratch-wounds. After 18 h the same area of the scratch wounds were photographed again and the reduction in wound width was measured using ImageJ 1.45 s software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
Cell cycle analysis
1×105 FB, KC and EC were seeded in 6-well plates and cultured overnight in their respective growth medium. To synchronize cells they were cultivated in basic medium for 18 hours. Lyophilized SECPBMC (2.5×106 per ml) and lyophilized control medium were resolved in either DMEM, basic keratinocyte medium (KBM, Lonza) or basic endothelial cell medium (EBM, Lonza) - all without serum and growth factors - and added to the respective cell types for 24 h. Cell cycle analysis was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Briefly, after 24 h of treatment, cells were incubated with BrdU (10 µM final concentration, kit-component) for 2 h. After fixation (BD Cytofix/Cytoperm™, kit-component) cells were stained with a fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) conjugated anti-BrdU antibody (BD Biosciences, kit-component) for 30 min. After washing cells were stained with 7-AAD (BD Biosciences, kit-component) and immediately analyzed on a FACS-Calibur (BD Biosciences). Gates were set according to the manufacturer's instructions and data were evaluated using the FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR, USA).
Tube formation assay
Twenty-four-well plates were coated with 300 µl of Matrigel (BD Biosciences) and incubated for 1 h at 37°C. 1×105 EC in 1 ml EBM containing 10% FBS with either lyophilized SECPBMC (derived from 2.5×106 per ml) or lyophilized medium were seeded into duplicate wells and observed 24 h after incubation. EC treated with 100 ng/ml vascular endothelial cell growth factor (VEGF, R&D-systems, Minneapolis, USA) served as positive control.
Western blot analysis
3×106 FB, KC and EC were seeded in 6-well plates and cultured overnight in their respective growth medium. After removal of the medium cells were washed twice with PBS (Gibco) and cultured in their respective basal medium without growth factors for 3 h. Aliquots of lyophilized SECPBMC and medium were resolved in the different basal media at a 10-fold concentration. One tenth of this solution was then directly added to the cell cultures. After 1 h cells were washed with PBS and lyzed in SDS-PAGE loading buffer. After sonication and centrifugation, proteins were size fractionated by SDS-PAGE through an 8 to 18% gradient gel (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden) and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA). Immunodetection was performed with anti-c-Jun, anti-phospho-c-Jun, anti-CREB, anti-phospho-CREB, anti-Akt, anti-phospho-AKT, anti-Erk1/2, anti-phospho-Erk1/2, anti-Hsp27, anti-phospho-Hsp27 (Ser15) and anti-GAPDH followed by a HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG antiserum or a goat anti-rabbit IgG antiserum (all antibodies are listed in Table 1). Reaction products were detected by chemiluminescence with the ChemiGlow reagent (Biozyme Laboratories Limited, South Wales, U.K.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Bands from 3 independent experiments were quantified using ImageJ software and the mean increase in phosphorylation was calculated in relation to the expression of the respective non-phosphorylated proteins.
Quantification of blood vessel density
To quantify neo-angiogenesis, the granulation tissue underneath the wounds of each CD31 stained wound from 15 animals in each group was evaluated. CD31 positive blood vessels were counted and expressed in absolute numbers. In addition, wound angiogenesis was analyzed by measuring the percentage of the CD31+ area using ImageJ software. The percentage of the CD31+ area in relation to the granulation tissue was calculated.
Quantification of Ki67 positive keratinocytes
High-power images of Ki67-stained sections were used to quantify the number of proliferating KC. Digital images of Ki67-stained slides were taken from the regenerated epidermis at the wound edges of each sample. Ki67-positive KC within the full width of the captured field were counted. Regenerated epidermis was defined by hyperthickening and lack of hair follicles.
Statistical methods
Statistical analysis was performed using the program Graph-Pad Prism version 5 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Statistical comparison of two means was performed by using Student's t-test, and comparison of more than two means was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni multiple comparisons post-test. For Figure 1A Kruskal-Wallis testing was used. A p-value <0.05 was defined as the level of significance and is depicted with *.
Results
SECPBMC containing emulsions enhance wound healing in mice in vivo
To study the capacity of SECPBMC to promote skin wound healing we used the full thickness punch wound model in C57BL/6J mice. We generated emulsions containing either lyophilized SECPBMC, lyophilized UltraCulture medium or physiological NaCl-solution. Six mm punch biopsies were set on the backs of C57BL/6J mice and treated daily with the different emulsions for 3 days. Wound areas were analyzed throughout the healing process until a crust had formed. Compared to an emulsion containing lyophilized medium as well as an emulsion containing NaCl-solution, application of an SECPBMC-containing emulsion strongly enhanced wound closure during the first 3 days (Figure 1A). This advantage in wound closure was still visible at day 7, as shown by representative photographs of the wounds (Figure 1B). H&E staining of the wounds after 7 days revealed that wound healing was more advanced after application of SECPBMC containing emulsion (Figure 1C). Microscopic examination revealed that the wound gap distance was smaller in the SECPBMC-treated mice and re-epithelialization was markedly enhanced in these animals (Figure 1C).
SECPBMC induces migratory capacity of dermal fibroblasts and epidermal keratinocytes
To investigate the capacity of SECPBMC to induce cell migration on human primary FB and KC the cells were grown to confluency, scratched and treated with lyophilized control medium or SECPBMC for 18 hours. As shown in figure 2, SECPBMC significantly induced cell migration in both, dermal FB (Figure 2A,B) and epidermal KC (Figure 2D,E). By contrast, cell cycle analysis revealed no significant changes in cell cycle progression after SECPBMC treatment in both cell types (Figure 2C,F). This finding was consistent with our in vivo observation, where we could not detect a significant increase in proliferating cells in the regenerated epidermis of the skin wounds treated with SECPBMC containing emulsions, as demonstrated by Ki67 staining (Figure 2G,H).
SECPBMC shows strong angiogenic properties in vivo and in vitro
Since a crucial event during wound healing is the sprouting of newly formed blood vessels into the wounded tissue, we examined the efficacy of SECPBMC to induce neo-angiogenesis in vivo. Skin wounds, harvested seven days after wounding, were stained for CD31, a specific marker for blood vessels. As shown in figure 3, we found a massive increase in CD31 positive cells in SECPBMC treated wounds, indicating enhanced neo-angiogenesis (Figure 3A). Blood vessel density in SECPBMC treated wounds increased from 52±10.7 per high power field in medium treated wounds to 132±31 in SECPBMC treated wounds (Figure 3B). In addition, morphometric analyses revealed that the percentage of the granulation tissue taken up by blood vessels was markedly increased in the SECPBMC treated animals compared to the medium treated group (Figure 3C). We further investigated the effect of SECPBMC on primary microvascular skin EC in vitro. In contrast to FB and KC, treatment of EC with SECPBMC strongly induced proliferation in these cells (Figure 3D). The observed increase in the proliferation rate after SECPBMC-treatment in EC was even higher than that observed after incubation with VEGF (100 ng/ml), which is a known strong promotor of EC-proliferation. In addition to enhanced cell growth, newly formed EC need to reorganize into a three-dimensional tubular structure in a wound healing scenario. We therefore investigated the ability of SECPBMC to induce tube formation in a matrigel assay system. As shown in Figure 3E, cultivation of EC together with SECPBMC indeed led to the formation of tubular structures. In comparison, no tube formation was observed in EC cultured with control medium (Figure 3E).
SECPBMC treatment leads to activation of signaling cascades involved in cell migration, proliferation and survival
To get more information about the underlying mechanisms, we analyzed a variety of signaling cascades involved in cell migration, proliferation and survival. In human primary KC SECPBMC led to a rapid activation of CREB, Erk1/2, c-Jun, Akt and Hsp27, in human primary dermal FB Erk1/2, c-Jun, Akt and Hsp27 were activated and in dermal microvascular EC SECPBMC led to the activation of CREB, c-Jun and Hsp27 (Figure 4).
Discussion
The skin protects the organism against environmental aggressions and microbial pathogens and forms an inside-out barrier preventing fluid loss [1]. Loss of its integrity as a result of injury or illness may cause chronic skin ulcers leading to major disability or even death. Chronic wounds are often difficult to treat, encouraging investigations for new innovative therapeutics that enhance wound healing and tissue regeneration. Recently, cell based therapies have been suggested to be of great advantage in a wound healing scenario. Most of these studies showed positive effects of directly applied highly purified cells to the wounds, which however, are often difficult to isolate and not easily applicable. Increasing evidence is surfacing that all observed therapeutic effects rely on their ability to secrete a cocktail of factors that enhance tissue regeneration, modulate the local environment and stimulate proliferation, migration, differentiation, survival and functional recovery of resident cells [23], [24]. Recent publications have demonstrated that progenitor cells secrete soluble proteins and induce regenerative mechanisms in a paracrine manner [25]–[27]. In addition, also mesenchymal stem cells have been shown to augment the proliferative phase in wound healing that is characterized by angiogenesis, granulation tissue formation, epithelialization and wound contraction [9], [10], [28], [29]. In the present study we demonstrated that lyophilized supernatants of unstimulated cultured PBMC (SECPBMC) are able to enhance wound healing in a mouse model in vivo, and induce characteristics of wound healing in human cells in vitro.
In a different experimental setting we could previously show that infusion of apoptotic PBMC suspensions in an experimental model of acute myocardial infarction prevented myocardial damage and tissue remodeling [12], , and that this protective effect was also conferred by only applying the secretome of these cells [22]. However, in contrast to stem cells isolated by complicated and time consuming protocols, we used easily obtainable PBMC and showed that one single infusion of PBMC derived “paracrine factors” prevented myocardial damage. We analyzed the secretome of both, apoptotic and living PBMC, and found a variety of highly expressed factors, which have been associated with cytoprotection and tissue regeneration [22]. In line with the work of Di Santo et al., we were not able to block these in vitro effects by IL-8, ENA-78, VEGF and MMP9 blocking antibodies [22]. Thus, our data strongly suggest that for tissue protection and regeneration an interaction of several factors is necessary for its full regenerative capacity.
Cell migration and proliferation are rate limiting events in skin wound healing. Here we could show that SECPBMC not only improved cutaneous wound healing in a murine model, but also induced migration and proliferation of primary human skin cells. Importantly, SECPBMC treatment of mouse wounds led to a massive sprouting of newly formed blood vessels. Similar angiogenic effects were also found on human dermal microvascular EC in vitro, since SECPBMC strongly induced proliferation and tube formation in these cells. In a further set of experiments we could identify multiple signaling cascades, which were induced after SECPBMC treatment of different human primary skin cells. Nevertheless, a clear conclusion on the signaling cascades and the initiating factors that might be responsible for the diverse effects in the different cell types cannot be drawn at the present time. Further studies attempting to unravel the factors involved in these processes are ongoing. Currently, we can just speculate on the mechanisms initiated after the treatment with SECPBMC. We have previously determined high amounts of angiogenic factors present in SECPBMC (VEGF, PDGF, IL-8, ENA-78 and others) [22]. In addition, factors that have been associated with enhanced skin re-epithelialization or that promote wound healing as a chemoattractant to cells of the immune system (eg. MCP-1, RANTES, IL-8) are found in high concentrations [22]. In a recent publication by Lin and coworkers it was demonstrated that toll-like receptor 3 ligand, polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid (Poly (I∶C)), promotes wound healing in a similar mouse model. They further showed that treatment with Poly(I∶C) led to a massive overproduction of chemokines such as MIP-2/CXCL2, MIP-1α/CCL3, MCP-1/CCL2, and RANTES/CCL5, which were responsible for the observed enhanced re-epithelialization [30]. The data by Lin et al. suggest that in our setting these factors might also play an important role for the re-epithelialization of skin wounds. However, in contrast to the study by Lin et al., where a significant effect on wound closure was shown several days after Poly(I∶C) treatment, SECPBMC induces an immediate wound closure. This might be explained by the fact that SECPBMC already contains high amounts of cytokines and chemokines, in contrast to other treatments, where production of these factors has to be stimulated first. Together we showed a series of events, all contributing to an improved wound healing. The exact mechanisms however, as well as the responsible factor(s) are still not known. Thus, our data provide the basis for further investigations which will address these points in future studies.
In summary, we have shown for the first time that cell culture supernatants obtained from PBMC (SECPBMC) enhance wound healing in a mouse model and lead to activation of several wound healing associated events in human skin cells. We think that SECPBMC shows several advantages for the clinical use: 1) The raw material (PBMC) is easily obtainable, 2) It shows minimal or no antigenicity due to cell-free content and 3) it allows “off the shelf” utilization in the clinical setting. Therefore, the formulation and use of SECPBMC containing emulsions might represent an interesting new option in the treatment of non-healing skin ulcers.
Acknowledgments
We thank Heidemarie Rossiter for essential technical support.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the Christian Doppler Research Association, APOSIENCE AG, and the Medical University of Vienna. Maria Gschwandtner was supported by a grant from the Austrian Science Fund FWF: T545-B19. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Elias PM (2005) Stratum corneum defensive functions: An integrated view. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 125: 183–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Martin P (1997) Wound healing - Aiming for perfect skin regeneration. Science 276: 75–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Falanga V (2005) Wound healing and its impairment in the diabetic foot. Lancet 366: 1736–1743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Singer AJ, Clark RA (1999) Cutaneous wound healing. N Engl J Med 341: 738–746 doi:10.1056/NEJM199909023411006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Menke NB, Ward KR, Witten TM, Bonchev DG, Diegelmann RF (2007) Impaired wound healing. Clin Dermatol 25: 19–25 doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2006.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Holzinger C, Zuckermann A, Kopp C, Schollhammer A, Imhof M, et al. (1994) Treatment of Nonhealing Skin Ulcers with Autologous Activated Mononuclear-Cells. European Journal of Vascular Surgery 8: 351–356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Asai J, Takenaka H, Ichihashi K, Ueda E, Katoh N, et al. (2006) Successful treatment of diabetic gangrene with topical application of a mixture of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and basic fibroblast growth factor. Journal of Dermatology 33: 349–352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Sander AL, Jakob H, Henrich D, Powerski M, Witt H, et al. (2011) Systemic Transplantation of Progenitor Cells Accelerates Wound Epithelialization and Neovascularization in the Hairless Mouse Ear Wound Model. Journal of Surgical Research 165: 165–170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Wu YJ, Chen L, Scott PG, Tredget EE (2007) Mesenchymal stem cells enhance wound healing through differentiation and angiogenesis. Stem Cells 25: 2648–2659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Barcelos LS, Duplaa C, Krankel N, Graiani G, Invernici G, et al. (2009) Human CD133(+) Progenitor Cells Promote the Healing of Diabetic Ischemic Ulcers by Paracrine Stimulation of Angiogenesis and Activation of Wnt Signaling. Circulation Research 104: 1095–U199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Walter MNM, Wright KT, Fuller HR, MacNeil S, Johnson WEB (2010) Mesenchymal stem cell-conditioned medium accelerates skin wound healing: An in vitro study of fibroblast and keratinocyte scratch assays. Experimental Cell Research 316: 1271–1281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Watson SL, Marcal H, Sarris M, Di Girolamo N, Coroneo MTC, et al. (2010) The effect of mesenchymal stem cell conditioned media on corneal stromal fibroblast wound healing activities. British Journal of Ophthalmology 94: 1067–1073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Yew TL, Hung YT, Li HY, Chen HW, Chen LL, et al. (2011) Enhancement of Wound Healing by Human Multipotent Stromal Cell Conditioned Medium: The Paracrine Factors and p38 MAPK Activation. Cell Transplantation 20: 693–706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Gnecchi M, He HM, Liang OD, Melo LG, Morello F, et al. (2005) Paracrine action accounts for marked protection of ischemic heart by Akt-modified mesenchymal stem cells. Nature Medicine 11: 367–368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Angoulvant D, Ivanes F, Ferrera R, Matthews PG, Nataf S, et al. (2011) Mesenchymal stem cell conditioned media attenuates in vitro and ex vivo myocardial reperfusion injury. Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation 30: 95–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hsiao ST, Asgari A, Lokmic Z, Sinclair R, Dusting GJ, et al.. (2012) Comparative Analysis of Paracrine Factor Expression in Human Adult Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived from Bone Marrow, Adipose, and Dermal Tissue. Stem Cells Dev. doi:10.1089/scd.2011.0674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 17. Horn AP, Frozza RL, Grudzinski PB, Gerhardt D, Hoppe JB, et al. (2009) Conditioned medium from mesenchymal stem cells induces cell death in organotypic cultures of rat hippocampus and aggravates lesion in a model of oxygen and glucose deprivation. Neuroscience Research 63: 35–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Tasso R, Ilengo C, Quarto R, Cancedda R, Caspi RR, et al. (2012) Mesenchymal stem cells induce functionally active T-regulatory lymphocytes in a paracrine fashion and ameliorate experimental autoimmune uveitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53: 786–793 doi:10.1167/iovs.11-8211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Demircan PC, Sariboyaci AE, Unal ZS, Gacar G, Subasi C, et al. (2011) Immunoregulatory effects of human dental pulp-derived stem cells on T cells: comparison of transwell co-culture and mixed lymphocyte reaction systems. Cytotherapy 13: 1205–1220 doi:10.3109/14653249.2011.605351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Ankersmit HJ, Hoetzenecker K, Dietl W, Soleiman A, Horvat R, et al. (2009) Irradiated cultured apoptotic peripheral blood mononuclear cells regenerate infarcted myocardium. European Journal of Clinical Investigation 39: 445–456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Lichtenauer M, Mildner M, Baumgartner A, Hasun M, Werba G, et al. (2011) Intravenous and intramyocardial injection of apoptotic white blood cell suspensions prevents ventricular remodelling by increasing elastin expression in cardiac scar tissue after myocardial infarction. Basic Research in Cardiology 106: 645–655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Lichtenauer M, Mildner M, Hoetzenecker K, Zimmermann M, Podesser BK, et al. (2011) Secretome of apoptotic peripheral blood cells (APOSEC) confers cytoprotection to cardiomyocytes and inhibits tissue remodelling after acute myocardial infarction: a preclinical study. Basic Research in Cardiology 106: 1283–1297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Zhang Y, Klassen HJ, Tucker BA, Perez MTR, Young MJ (2007) CNS progenitor cells promote a permissive environment for neurite outgrowth via a matrix metalloproteinase-2-dependent mechanism. Journal of Neuroscience 27: 4499–4506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Togel F, Westenfelder C (2007) Adult bone marrow-derived stem cells for organ regeneration and repair. Developmental Dynamics 236: 3321–3331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Di Santo S, Yang ZJ, von Ballmoos MW, Voelzmann J, Diehm N, et al. (2009) Novel Cell-Free Strategy for Therapeutic Angiogenesis: In Vitro Generated Conditioned Medium Can Replace Progenitor Cell Transplantation. Plos One 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Gnecchi M, Zhang ZP, Ni AG, Dzau VJ (2008) Paracrine Mechanisms in Adult Stem Cell Signaling and Therapy. Circulation Research 103: 1204–1219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Korf-Klingebiel M, Kempf T, Sauer T, Brinkmann E, Fischer P, et al. (2008) Bone marrow cells are a rich source of growth factors and cytokines: implications for cell therapy trials after myocardial infarction. European Heart Journal 29: 2851–2858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Smith AN, Willis E, Chan VT, Muffley LA, Isik FF, et al. (2010) Mesenchymal stem cells induce dermal fibroblast responses to injury. Experimental Cell Research 316: 48–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Yoon BS, Moon JH, Jun EK, Kim J, Maeng I, et al. (2010) Secretory Profiles and Wound Healing Effects of Human Amniotic Fluid-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Stem Cells and Development 19: 887–902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Lin Q, Wang L, Lin Y, Liu X, Ren X, et al. (2012) Toll-Like Receptor 3 Ligand Polyinosinic:Polycytidylic Acid Promotes Wound Healing in Human and Murine Skin. J Invest Dermatol 132: 2085–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]