Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications
. 2013 Feb 22;69(Pt 3):237–242. doi: 10.1107/S174430911300153X

Arginine 116 stabilizes the entrance to the metal ion-binding site of the MntC protein

Margarita Kanteev a, Noam Adir a,*
PMCID: PMC3606565  PMID: 23519795

The structures of wild-type MntC and of an R116A mutant have been determined to 2.7 and 3.5 Å resolution, respectively. The role of Arg116 in the outer shell of the active site is described.

Keywords: ABC transporter, site-directed mutagenesis, cyanobacteria

Abstract

The cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 imports Mn2+ ions via MntCAB, an ABC transport system that is expressed at submicromolar Mn2+ concentrations. The structures of the wild type (WT) and a site-directed mutant of the MntC solute-binding protein have been determined at 2.7 and 3.5 Å resolution, respectively. The WT structure is significantly improved over the previously determined structure (PDB entry 1xvl), showing improved Mn2+ binding site parameters, disulfide bonds in all three monomers and ions bound to the protein surface, revealing the role of Zn2+ ions in the crystallization liquor. The structure of MntC reveals that the active site is surrounded by neutral-to-­positive electrostatic potential and is dominated by a network of polar interactions centred around Arg116. The mutation of this residue to alanine was shown to destabilize loops in the entrance to the metal-ion binding site and suggests a possible role in MntC function.

1. Introduction  

Divalent metal ions such as Mn2+, Zn2+ and Fe2+ are vital micro­elements in every living cell owing to their ability to provide the electronic functionalities required by many enzymes. One of the most important roles of Mn2+ in nature is as a major component of the oxygen-evolving complex in photosystem II, which catalyses the oxidation of water to oxygen, enabling the initiation of linear electron transfer and releasing protons for use in ATP synthesis (Umena et al., 2011; Barber, 2008). In spite of the importance of Mn2+ homeo­stasis, many fundamental details regarding the import and regulation of cellular Mn2+ remain unclear (Salomon et al., 2011).

Mn2+ uptake in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis PCC sp. 6803 (Syn) has been investigated over the past 15 years. Transport of Mn2+ at different concentrations of extracellular Mn2+ was found to be carried out by two systems with different affinities (Keren et al., 2002; Bartsevich & Pakrasi, 1995; Bhattacharyya-Pakrasi et al., 2002), the expression of which is tightly regulated (Ogawa et al., 2002; Chandler et al., 2003). The uptake of Mn2+ under deficient conditions (<1 µM) is carried out by a high-affinity ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter (Jones et al., 2009) with high affinity for Mn2+ (MnCAB; Bartsevich & Pakrasi, 1995). Deletion of any one of the mntCAB genes encoding the three MnCAB transporter subunits leads to diminished oxygen-evolution rates.

The Syn MnCAB importer is proposed to be composed of two membrane-spanning permease domains (MntB) associated with two cytoplasmic NBDs (MntA), which supply energy to transport the substrate across the membrane by ATP hydrolysis. The Mn2+ substrate is first identified and bound by the solute-binding protein (SBP) MntC, which then associates with the permease, releasing the Mn ion (Bhattacharyya-Pakrasi et al., 2002). MntC is a member of the cluster IX subfamily of ABC-type metal permeases (Tam & Saier, 1993; Lawrence et al., 1998). Proteins of this group are components of transporters involved in the uptake of cations such as Mn2+, Zn2+ and Fe2+ (Dintilhac et al., 1997). The structure of the MntC protein was first determined to a resolution of 2.9 Å by X-ray crystallography (Rukhman et al., 2005) using heterologously expressed protein. The MntC metal ion (MI) binding site was shown to be bind Mn2+ tetravalently with coordination by two histidine N∊2 atoms (His89 and His154), one aspartic acid Oδ2 atom (Asp295) and one glutamic acid O∊1 atom (Glu220). The structures of four further metal-transporter SBPs from the cluster IX subfamily have also been determined: PsaA from Streptococcus pneumoniae (Lawrence et al., 1998; McDevitt et al., 2011), TroA from Treponema pallidum (Lee et al., 1999), ZnuA from Syn (Banerjee et al., 2003) and Escherichia coli (Li & Jogl, 2007; Yatsunyk et al., 2008) and the iron-transport protein MtsA from S. pyogenes (Sun et al., 2009). MntC, PsaA, TroA and ZnuA have significant differences in terms of amino-acid sequence (Rukhman et al., 2005); however, their overall structures and metal-binding sites are quite similar. The most important difference between MntC and the other SBPs is the presence of a disulfide bond between cysteine residues (Cys219 and Cys268) near the metal-binding site (Rukhman et al., 2005). It has been suggested that the special requirement for manganese in photosynthetic organisms is achieved by structural or molecular characteristics provided by this disulfide bond (Rukhman et al., 2005). Disulfide-bond reduction in vitro lowers the affinity of the MntC protein towards Mn2+, suggesting that the redox potential of the cell may affect Mn2+ import at low Mn2+ concentrations (Rukhman et al., 2005). The heterologously expressed MntC protein was found to aggregate into inclusion bodies and thus the protein required unfolding in 8 M urea and subsequent refolding prior to its crystallization (Adir et al., 2002). Crystallization absolutely required the presence of 10–100 mM Zn2+; however, the positions of the Zn ions could not be resolved in the structure and there was uncertainty as to whether these ions might compete with the bound Mn ions (McDevitt et al., 2011) or whether they only had a role in crystal lattice formation. The structure deposited as PDB entry 1xvl (Rukhman et al., 2005) had two oxidized disulfide bonds and one reduced disulfide bond, and the monomer with the reduced disulfide bond had significant disorder. In this work, we present a significantly improved structure of the wild-type MntC protein and present a structure of a site-specific R116A mutant that reveals details of how Arg116 is involved in stabilizing the structure of the MntC protein.

2. Materials and methods  

2.1. Isolation, purification and crystallization  

The cloning and expression of the Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 mntC gene has been described previously (Adir et al., 2002; Rukhman et al., 2005). This clone resulted in insoluble proteins and thus the gene was subcloned into a modified pET-28b vector (a kind gift from Gadi Schuster, Technion) which includes a TEV protease cleavage site enabling His-tag removal by two rounds of chelation chromatography (Ni–NTA Agarose, Qiagen) from E. coli BL-21 cells. Expression was initiated by the addition of 1 mM IPTG at 310 K for 4 h. The cells were treated twice with a pressure cell (French Press, Spectronic Instruments Inc., Rochester, New York, USA) and cell debris was removed by centrifugation (15 000 rev min−1 for 20 min at 288 K). The supernatant was applied onto a Ni2+-bound affinity column and eluted with an appropriate buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl pH 8, 300 mM NaCl, 250 mM imidazole). The elution fractions containing the MntC protein were pooled together and dialyzed against 50 mM Tris–HCl pH 8). The His tag was removed by incubating the protein with TEV protease overnight and the protein was then loaded onto a Ni2+ column. The MntC protein without His tag was found in the flowthrough fraction. Further purification was performed by anion-exchange HPLC (PL-SAX 1000 Å, Polymer Laboratories). MntC was eluted with a linear gradient of 0–500 mM NaCl in 50 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0. MntC-­containing fractions were collected and analysed by SDS–PAGE. The main peak fractions were combined, dialyzed against 50 mM Tris pH 8 and concentrated to 10 mg ml−1 by ultrafiltration on Centricon-10 concentrators (Amicon).

Preparation of the R116A mutant DNA plasmid was performed according to the Stratagene QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis protocol. The gene was amplified using the PCR reaction with forward and reverse primers containing the desired mutation (5′-­AACGGCATGAACCTAGAGGCTTGGTTCGAGCAATTTTTC-3′ and 5′-CAAAAATTGCTCGAACCAAGCCTCTAGGTTCATGCCGTT-3′, respectively; the sequence that was changed by site-directed mutagenesis is underlined). Sequence determination was performed to verify the presence of the mutations (Macrogen Korea; http://www.macrogen.com). Recombinant mutant protein was expressed and purified as described above.

Prior to crystallization, protein samples were incubated overnight with 1 mM MnCl2. Crystallization was performed by hanging-drop vapour diffusion in 24-well plates (Hampton Research) at 293 K. Extensive screening for alternative crystallization conditions was unsuccessful and thus the crystallization conditions that were used for the structure deposited as PDB entry 1xvl (Rukhman et al., 2005) including 50 mM zinc acetate were used.

2.2. Data collection and structure determination  

X-ray diffraction data were collected on beamline ID23-1 at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF), Grenoble, France. The data were indexed and integrated using MOSFLM (Leslie, 1992) or XDS (Kabsch, 2010) and scaled and merged using SCALA (Winn et al., 2011). The structures were solved by molecular replacement using Phaser (McCoy et al., 2007) with the coordinates of PDB entry 1xvl as a model. Refinement was performed using PHENIX (Adams et al., 2011) and REFMAC (Murshudov et al., 2011). Manual model building, real-space refinement and validation were performed using Coot (Emsley & Cowtan, 2004) and CCP4 (Winn et al., 2011). Data-collection, phasing and refinement statistics are presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Data-collection and refinement statistics.

Values in parentheses are for the last shell.

Structure (PDB code) MnWT (3ujp) MnR116A (4irm)
X-ray data collection
Space group P3121 P3121
Unit-cell parameters
a () 127.52 128.40
b () 127.52 128.40
c () 89.73 90.51
() 90.00 90.00
() 90.00 90.00
() 120.00 120.00
Resolution range () 36.82.7 (2.852.70) 24.53.5 (3.693.50)
Observed reflections 70773 58713
Unique reflections 21730 (1569) 11028 (1585)
I/(I) 7.0 (0.7) 15.0 (6.2)
R merge 0.095 (1.1) 0.078 (0.324)
Completeness (%) 92.5 (57.0) 99.0 (99.8)
Multiplicity 3.3 (3.2) 5.3 (4.9)
Refinement
R/R free (%) 23.1/28.4 (35.4/35.3) 29.38/30.48 (51.0/53.5)
Amino acids 921 758
Total No. of non-H atoms 6419 5881
No. of water molecules 12 0
No. of Mn ions 3 3
No. of zinc ions 6 0
No. of cacodylate ions 4 0
Average B factor (), protein atoms 88.5 97.5
R.m.s.d.
Bond lengths () 0.026 0.05
Bond angles () 1.733 2.95
Ramachandran plot
Favoured regions (%) 86.6 77.5
Allowed regions (%) 9.7 18.7
Outliers (%) 3.7 3.8

R merge = Inline graphic Inline graphic, where I(hkl) is the mean intensity of the symmetry-related reflections I i(hkl).

R/R free = Inline graphic Inline graphic, where R and R free are calculated using the working and test reflections, respectively. The test reflections (10%) were held aside and were not used during the entire refinement process.

2.3. Determination of metal-ion concentration  

The amount of bound Mn2+ was measured by ICP-AES (ICP Spectrometer, iCap 6000 Series, Thermo Scientific). MnCl2 was added to each protein sample and, after an incubation period of 24 h, each sample (up to 10 ml) was dialyzed three times against 2 l 50 mM Tris–HCl pH 8 in order to remove nonspecifically bound MIs.

2.4. Accession codes  

The coordinates and structure factors for WT and R116A MntC have been deposited in the RSCB Protein Data Bank under accession codes 3ujp and 3v63, respectively.

3. Results and discussion  

3.1. Determination of an improved crystal structure of the MntC protein  

Both crystal and X-ray diffraction quality can in many cases be traced back to protein purity and homogeneity. For the previously determined MntC structure (PDB entry 1xvl; Rukhman et al., 2005), the recombinant protein was found to be insoluble, requiring the resulting inclusion bodies to be unfolded in 8 M urea followed by refolding by removal of urea (Adir et al., 2002; Rukhman et al., 2005). In order to obtain an improved crystal structure of the MntC protein, the mntC gene was first recloned into a pQE-60 vector, with which we transformed BL-21 cells. The resulting expressed protein had improved solubility and the addition of a C-terminal 6×His tag enabled improved purification. The expressed protein was truncated by 49 residues at the N-terminus, as it has previously been proposed that this stretch of residues was not part of the manganese-binding functionality of the structure (Rukhman et al., 2005); rather, it is involved in anchoring the protein to the periplasmic membrane. While the change in the expression host and removal of non-essential residues at the N-terminus of MntC enhanced the solubility of this protein, it appeared that addition of the affinity tag actually disturbed the crystal quality, as the diffraction from dozens of crystals proved to be very disordered. Since alternative crystallization conditions could not be identified, we screened alternative expression methods. We finally obtained improved crystals by transferring the mntC gene into a modified pET-28b vector that provided soluble protein that could be affinity-purified followed by proteolytic removal of the affinity tag (see §2 for additional details).

3.2. The overall structure of the wild-type MntC protein  

We collected a full data set from a WT MntC (MnWT) crystal to 2.7 Å resolution (Table 1). The overall structure of MnWT (PDB entry 3ujp) is similar to the previous determined structure of MntC (PDB entry 1xvl). However, in contrast to the 1xvl structure (Rukhman et al., 2005), all three monomers in the 3ujp structure contained an oxidized form of the disulfide bond. Since the protein was cytoplasmically expressed in both the 1xvl and 3ujp structures, we assume that the disulfide bonds are all reduced upon cell disruption. Oxidation of the disulfides occurs owing to the presence of oxygen in the solvents used during protein isolation and purification. We believe that since the improved protocol provided us with correctly folded MntC in solution, Cys219 and Cys268 are properly aligned and thus oxidation to the disulfide occurred more efficiently. In the 1xvl structure a subpopulation of refolded MntC could not properly form the disulfide bond. In the trimeric asymmetric unit, these monomers were always found at the position with the fewest number of crystal contacts. This was likely to be necessary for crystallization to occur, since monomers lacking disulfide bonds are more structurally heterogeneous and could be more easily accommodated at this position.

The MnWT protein only crystallized well in the presence of 50 mM ZnCl2 with a trimer in the asymmetric unit. In the 1xvl structure the zinc ions in the mother liquor could not be identified in the electron-density maps and thus there was a possibility that the role of Zn during crystallization was to ensure full occupancy of the metal ion binding site, although the protein was previously incubated with Mn2+ and the presence of this ion had been verified crystallo­graphically (Rukhman et al., 2005). In the MnWT structure presented here six zinc ions and four cacodylate ions could be clearly identified in the electron-density maps as being bound in the interfaces between the subunits of the protein, ligated by Glu, Gln and Asn residues (Fig. 1). The concentration of observable zinc ions is thus about 45 mM, accounting for almost all of the available ions in the crystallization solution. We are thus able to propose that the major role of zinc ions in the crystallization liquor is to serve as bridging charges within the crystal lattice.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Crystallographic characteristics of the MnWT structure. The structure of the trimer in the asymmetric unit is represented in cartoon representation and coloured by B factor (lowest B factors in blue and highest B factors in orange-red). The C-­terminal domain of each monomer is indicated by a bracket. Cacodylate ions are represented in stick representation and Zn2+ ions are represented by grey spheres. Two groups of residues (1 and 2) involved in Zn2+ coordination are shown as magenta sticks; group 1 indicates the interactions between Zn2+ and three monomers in the asymmetric unit and group 2 those between residues from neighbouring asymmetric units. All molecular figures presented in this work were generated using PyMOL (DeLano, 2002).

The monomer of the MntC protein (Fig. 2) can be subdivided into three domains: the N-terminal globular domain (residues 49–137; cyan), the α-helical backbone (residues 158–210 and 306–324; yellow) and the C-terminal globular domain (residues 138–157 and 211–305; magenta). In the MnWT structure the B factors of the C-terminal domain are consistently higher than those of the other two domains and vary between the different monomers in the asymmetric unit (Fig. 1). Closer examination of the crystal lattice revealed that the C-­terminal domain of monomer A is stabilized by polar interactions with the neighbouring asymmetric unit and thus has the lowest B factors. The C-terminal domain of monomer B is somewhat less stabilized by the surrounding molecules, while in monomer C this domain does not have any stabilization contacts and has the highest B factors in the structure. As will be described below, the flexibility of the C-terminal domain appears to be critical for MntC function, and the variation in the position of this domain affords us a more diverse view. It should be noted that no such flexibility of the C-­terminal domains has been reported in other SBPs for which structures have been determined.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The structure of MnWT shows that the Arg116 residue forms a polar bonding network at the entrance to the Mn2+-binding site. The structure of the monomer shows the N-terminal, C-terminal and backbone domains (cyan, magenta and yellow cartoons, respectively). The Mn2+ ion is represented by a black sphere. Residues involved in the polar interaction cage are shown as sticks (see the enlargement on the left for details, which is rotated 180° with respect to the model on the right). Arg116 is located at the entrance to the Mn2+-binding site of the protein, locking the N-terminal and C-terminal domains by forming polar contacts (black dashed lines) with the side-chain functional groups of Tyr147 and Glu243 and the backbone carbonyl of Asn241. An additional contact with the backbone of His89 is not shown for clarity. The closest distances (Å) between the above residues (monomer A) are shown.

3.3. An extended view of the Mn2+-binding site  

The MntCAB system is only expressed at very low levels of extracellular Mn2+ (Bartsevich & Pakrasi, 1995) and also binds Mn2+ tightly in vitro (Rukhman et al., 2005). On the other hand, the actual MI-binding site is rather similar to those of SBPs that bind other MIs such as Zn2+ (Lee et al., 1999; Lawrence et al., 1998; Banerjee et al., 2003; McDevitt et al., 2011). It would thus seem likely that MntC must have structural elements that either selectively bind Mn2+ or selectively prevent the dissociation of Mn2+ (as opposed to other ions) once it has bound to the site. Both characteristics are most likely to be found in the second and third shells of residues surrounding the binding site: residues within a radius of 6–10 Å of the MI. In comparison with other SBPs of known structure, we can state that what is unique about the third shell of the MntC protein (near the surface of the protein) is that these residues impart a relatively neutral to positive electrostatic surface potential around the binding site (Fig. 3). We analyzed the outer shell residues around the binding site of the MntC protein and revealed one critical residue, Arg116, which appeared to be central to determining the outer shell characteristics. This residue is located close to the putative entrance to the MI-binding site and strongly contributes to the positive electrostatic potential of the shell. In the case of MntC, Arg116 is a central residue in a network of potential hydrogen bonds between the N-terminal and C-terminal domains of the protein. The network includes the side chains of Glu243, Tyr147, the backbone carbonyl of Asn241 (Fig. 2) and His89 (not shown), all of which are situated prominently in the loops that form the putative entrance to the MI-binding site. The Asn241 side chain juts into the binding site and may affect the Mn2+-binding residues directly, while His89 is one of the four residues that directly bind the Mn2+ ion. The Arg116 hydrogen-bonding network thus has the effect of creating a stable cage around the bound Mn2+ ion and may help in positioning both the binding-site and first-shell residues correctly in order to enable differentiation between Mn2+ and Zn2+ (or other MIs). The conformation of the side chain of Glu243 in the three monomers found in the asymmetric unit is variable and can point either towards Arg116 or away towards Glu244; however, when stabilized by Arg116 the residue and indeed the entire loop is stabilized and has lower B factors. Since the Glu243 and Arg116 loops both face outwards from the MI-binding site entrance in a fashion that has been suggested to form the interface between the SBP and permeases in ABC transporters (Hvorup et al., 2007), we suggest that the movement of Glu243 between the stabilized bound form (to Arg116) and the looser unbound form is most likely to play a role in the formation of the MntC–MntB complex. In order to further investigate the importance of Arg116, we mutated this residue.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Calculated electrostatic potentials of SBPs. The surface electrostatic potential of three SPBs, (a) PsaA (PDB entry 1psz; Lawrence et al., 1998), (b) TroA (PDB entry 1toa; Lee et al., 1999) and (c) MntC (PDB entry 3ujp; this work), were calculated using APBS (Baker et al., 2001) with the AMBER force field option and were visualized in PyMOL (DeLano, 2002). The calculated scale between the strongest blue (positive) and red (negative) electrostatic potentials is 15kT. Black arrows indicate the entrance to the MI binding site. The name and PDB code (in parentheses) of each protein are indicated.

3.4. The crystal structure of the MntC R116A mutant protein  

The MntC R116A mutant protein (MnR116A) was expressed, purified and crystallized in the same fashion as the MnWT protein. We expected that growing diffraction-quality crystals of the mutated protein would be difficult, since our analysis revealed that Arg116 serves as the central residue of the hydrogen-bond network in the active-site entrance. In most screens, the mutated protein indeed failed to crystallize. A single diffracting crystal was obtained under conditions similar to those used for the MnWT protein. This crystal enabled determination of the structure of the MnR116A protein to 3.5 Å resolution. Compared with the MnWT structure, the replacement of the Arg116 side chain by the Ala methyl group results in movement of the above residues as well as of entire loops (Supplementary Fig. S11). However, the domains remain in similar positions, i.e. the protein does not ‘open up’ owing to loss of the hydrogen-bonding network. The crystal-packing forces in the MnR116A structure are similar to those in the MnWT structure and the formation of correct interactions between adjacent asymmetric units is likely to be critical for crystal order and diffraction quality. The lower resolution could be explained by loop movements in both the N-terminal and C-terminal domains which result in stretches of disorder in the electron-density maps (Fig. 4). This observation adds an additional characteristic that differentiates MntC from the PsaA and TroA homologues (which bind either Zn2+ or Mn2+), since no homologous network between the N-terminal and C-terminal domains appears to be required by these two latter proteins to stabilize their structure. The calculated electron density obtained from the MnR116A mutant diffraction data is remarkably good for many other segments of the protein, including the Mn2+-binding sites and the disulfide bridge of monomer A (the other two potential disulfides are reduced).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Quality of the electron-density map of the MnR116A structure. A 2F oF c electron-density map contoured at 1.5σ (blue) is overlaid onto the MnR116A (subunit B) structure, which is represented by red ribbons. Two missing loops between residues Ala143 and Asp149 and between Gln244 and Asp254 are represented by black dashed lines. The electron-density maps also shows that despite the low resolution the rest of the protein backbone and many of the side-chain configurations were easily traced.

3.5. The suggested role of Arg116 in the MntC protein  

The program CASTp (Dundas et al., 2006), which can identify cavities within proteins, indicated that mutation of Arg116 increased the size of the cavity between the MI-binding site and the surface by nearly twofold. However, since the resolutions of the two structures presented here are significantly different and the R116A structure lacks surface loops, direct quantitative comparison between the cavity sizes may be inaccurate. In order to visualize the opening of the active site owing to the R116A mutation, we deleted the missing loops from the MnWT structure and then visualized all atoms with a 9 Å radius from the Mn2+ ion (Supplementary Fig. S2, red). Exposure of the active site is mainly owing to a shift in the exterior loop containing residues 242–246 (Supplementary Fig. S2, yellow), which moves significantly owing to the loss of the interaction between Arg116 and Asn241. It might be expected that this major change in the binding site might lead to the release of Mn2+; however, ICP-AES analysis of the MnWT and MnR116A structures showed only a small decrease in the binding affinity towards Mn2+ (Supplementary Table S1), which was less than that found for the reduction of the disulfide bond (Rukhman et al., 2005). We suggest that the hydrogen-bonding network between the C-terminal and N-terminal domains in the MntC protein is formed during Mn2+ binding, stabilizing the flexible C-­terminal domain and bringing specific surface residues into the correct positions required for binding to the MntB permease. The interactions between the MntC and the MntB protein are most likely to open the active site by overcoming the hydrogen-bonding network between His89, Asn241, Glu243, Tyr147 and Arg116, and facilitating the release of Mn2+ from the active site of the protein.

The results presented here, coupled with our previous observations on the role of the disulfide bond in Mn2+ binding (Rukhman et al., 2005), strongly indicate that the MntC protein is under tighter and more varied control (compared with the other SBP proteins described above) with respect to metal binding and release. This is most likely owing to the absolute requirement of Mn2+ import for photosystem II activity coupled with the need to prevent alternative ion binding (especially Zn2+) when Mn2+ concentrations are extremely low.

Supplementary Material

PDB reference: MntC, wild type, 3ujp

PDB reference: R116A mutant, 3v63

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S174430911300153X/tt5034sup1.pdf

f-69-00237-sup1.pdf (334.1KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the US–Israel Binational Science Foundation (2005179). We gratefully thank the staff of the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (beamline ID23-1) for provision of synchrotron-radiation facilities and assistance.

Footnotes

1

Supplementary material has been deposited in the IUCr electronic archive (Reference: TT5034).

References

  1. Adams, P. D. et al. (2011). Methods, 55, 94–106.
  2. Adir, N., Rukhman, V., Brumshtein, B. & Anati, R. (2002). Acta Cryst. D58, 1476–1478. [DOI] [PubMed]
  3. Baker, N. A., Sept, D., Joseph, S., Holst, M. J. & McCammon, J. A. (2001). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 10037–10041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  4. Banerjee, S., Wei, B., Bhattacharyya-Pakrasi, M., Pakrasi, H. B. & Smith, T. J. (2003). J. Mol. Biol. 333, 1061–1069. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Barber, J. (2008). Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 363, 2665–2674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  6. Bartsevich, V. V. & Pakrasi, H. B. (1995). EMBO J. 14, 1845–1853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  7. Bhattacharyya-Pakrasi, M., Pakrasi, H. B., Ogawa, T. & Aurora, R. (2002). Biochem. Soc. Trans. 30, 768–770. [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Chandler, L. E., Bartsevich, V. V. & Pakrasi, H. B. (2003). Biochemistry, 42, 5508–5514. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. DeLano, W. L. (2002). PyMOL. http://www.pymol.org. [DOI] [PubMed]
  10. Dintilhac, A., Alloing, G., Granadel, C. & Claverys, J. P. (1997). Mol. Microbiol. 25, 727–739. [DOI] [PubMed]
  11. Dundas, J., Ouyang, Z., Tseng, J., Binkowski, A., Turpaz, Y. & Liang, J. (2006). Nucleic Acids Res. 34, W116–W118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  12. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. (2004). Acta Cryst. D60, 2126–2132. [DOI] [PubMed]
  13. Hvorup, R. N., Goetz, B. A., Niederer, M., Hollenstein, K., Perozo, E. & Locher, K. P. (2007). Science, 317, 1387–1390. [DOI] [PubMed]
  14. Jones, P. M., O’Mara, M. L. & George, A. M. (2009). Trends Biochem. Sci. 34, 520–531. [DOI] [PubMed]
  15. Kabsch, W. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 133–144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  16. Keren, N., Kidd, M. J., Penner-Hahn, J. E. & Pakrasi, H. B. (2002). Biochemistry, 41, 15085–15092. [DOI] [PubMed]
  17. Lawrence, M. C., Pilling, P. A., Epa, V. C., Berry, A. M., Ogunniyi, A. D. & Paton, J. C. (1998). Structure, 6, 1553–1561. [DOI] [PubMed]
  18. Lee, Y.-H., Deka, R. K., Norgard, M. V., Radolf, J. D. & Hasemann, C. A. (1999). Nature Struct. Biol. 6, 628–633. [DOI] [PubMed]
  19. Leslie, A. G. W. (1992). Jnt CCP4/ESF–EACBM Newsl. Protein Crystallogr. 26
  20. Li, H. & Jogl, G. (2007). J. Mol. Biol. 368, 1358–1366. [DOI] [PubMed]
  21. McCoy, A. J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Adams, P. D., Winn, M. D., Storoni, L. C. & Read, R. J. (2007). J. Appl. Cryst. 40, 658–674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  22. McDevitt, C. A., Ogunniyi, A. D., Valkov, E., Lawrence, M. C., Kobe, B., McEwan, A. G. & Paton, J. C. (2011). PLoS Pathog. 7, e1002357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  23. Murshudov, G. N., Skubák, P., Lebedev, A. A., Pannu, N. S., Steiner, R. A., Nicholls, R. A., Winn, M. D., Long, F. & Vagin, A. A. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 355–367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  24. Ogawa, T., Bao, D. H., Katoh, H., Shibata, M., Pakrasi, H. B. & Bhattacharyya-Pakrasi, M. (2002). J. Biol. Chem. 277, 28981–28986. [DOI] [PubMed]
  25. Rukhman, V., Anati, R., Melamed-Frank, M. & Adir, N. (2005). J. Mol. Biol. 348, 961–969. [DOI] [PubMed]
  26. Salomon, E., Kanteev, M., Adir, N. & Keren, N. (2011). The Chemistry of Organomanganese Compounds, edited by Z. Rappoport & I. Marek, pp. 289–304. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  27. Sun, X., Baker, H. M., Ge, R., Sun, H., He, Q.-Y. & Baker, E. N. (2009). Biochemistry, 48, 6184–6190. [DOI] [PubMed]
  28. Tam, R. & Saier, M. H. (1993). Microbiol. Rev. 57, 320–346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  29. Umena, Y., Kawakami, K., Shen, J.-R. & Kamiya, N. (2011). Nature (London), 473, 55–60. [DOI] [PubMed]
  30. Winn, M. D. et al. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 235–242.
  31. Yatsunyk, L. A., Easton, J. A., Kim, L. R., Sugarbaker, S. A., Bennett, B., Breece, R. M., Vorontsov, I. I., Tierney, D. L., Crowder, M. W. & Rosenzweig, A. C. (2008). J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 13, 271–288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

PDB reference: MntC, wild type, 3ujp

PDB reference: R116A mutant, 3v63

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S174430911300153X/tt5034sup1.pdf

f-69-00237-sup1.pdf (334.1KB, pdf)

Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section F are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES