Skip to main content
Sarcoma logoLink to Sarcoma
. 2013 Mar 6;2013:757915. doi: 10.1155/2013/757915

Erratum to “Desmoid Fibromatosis in Pediatric Patients: Management Based on a Retrospective Analysis of 59 Patients and a Review of the Literature”

Caroline Oudot 1,*, Daniel Orbach 2, Véronique Minard-Colin 3, Jean Michon 2, Pierre Mary 4, Christophe Glorion 5, Sylvie Helfre 6, Jean-Louis Habrand 7, Odile Oberlin 3
PMCID: PMC3606798  PMID: 23533325

We need to update the first and third addresses as shown above. Furthermore, “zero” has been modified and replaced by “—” in Table 3.

Table 3.

Efficacy of 61 chemotherapy regimens in 32 patients with measurable disease during first or any subsequent line of therapy.

N CR PR Overall response (%) SD PD Unknown response (%)
VA 6 1 1 (17%) 5
IVA 13 3 1 4 (30%) 9
VAC 3 1 1 1
VAC and tamoxifen 1 1
Vinblastine-MTX 14 7 7 (50%) 5 1 1
Vinblastine-MTX-tamoxifen 7 3 3 (43%) 3 1
Doxorubicin with other agents* 5 2 2 (40%) 3
Imatinib mesylate 2 2
Others+ 10 2 2 (20%) 1 7

Total 61 3 16 19 (31%) 27 (44%) 12 (20%) 3 (5%)

VA: vincristine and dactinomycin; IVA: ifosfamide, vincristine and dactinomycin; VAC: vincristine, dactinomycin, and cyclophosphamide; MTX: methotrexate. N: number of patients; CR: complete response; PR: partial response; SD: stable disease; PD: progressive disease.

*Doxorubicin with vincristine, cisplatin, ifosfamide, cyclophosphamide, or tamoxifen.

+Others: VINCAEPI (vincristine, carboplatin, and VM 26), MMT95 protocol (IVA, etoposide, epirubicin, and carboplatin), dactinomycin alone, etoposide-ifosfamide, etoposide alone, and carboplatin.


Articles from Sarcoma are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES