Skip to main content
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology logoLink to International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology
. 2013 Mar 15;6(4):711–717.

UNC51-like kinase 1 as a potential prognostic biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hongtao Xu 1, Hong Yu 2, Xiaoyan Zhang 3, Xiaoying Shen 3, Kehao Zhang 3,4, Haihui Sheng 3,4, Shengbin Dai 5, Hengjun Gao 6,7
PMCID: PMC3606861  PMID: 23573318

Abstract

Autophagy is a fundamental cell biological process that confers stress tolerance, limits damage, and sustains viability under adverse conditions. Defective autophagy is associated with diverse diseases. The study aimed to investigate the relationship between UNC51-like kinase 1 (ULK1) expression and clinicopathological characteristics as well as survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Expression levels of ULK1 in 55 paired HCC and paracancerous tissues were examined using immunohistochemistry. Although not statistically significant, the expression of ULK1 in adjacent peritumoural tissue was lower than those in HCC tissues (P = 0.113). Expression level of ULK1 was significantly associated with tumor size (P = 0.015) after adjusted for age, sex, histologic grade, cirrhosis and TNM. Survival analysis showed that patients with high ULK1 expression had worse survival time than those with low ULK1 expression (hazard rate = 2.684, 95% CI 1.029–7.006, P = 0.044). The findings of the present study provide evidence that ULK1 represents a potential novel prognostic biomarker for HCC patients and may play an important role during the progression of HCC.

Keywords: Hepatocellular carcinoma, autophagy, UNC51-like kinase 1, survival, biomarker

Introduction

Liver cancer is the sixth most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer deaths in the world [1]. Liver cancer incidence rates are increasing in several low-risk developed countries and decreasing in some high-risk developing countries [2]. It was estimated that there were about 748,300 new liver cancer cases and 695,900 cancer deaths worldwide in 2008 [3]. China accounts for more than half of these cases and deaths [1]. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the major histological subtype, accounting for 70% to 85% of the total liver cancer cases [4].

Salvage chemotherapy is not commonly to treat HCC patient due to a low response rate. Disturbance of cell-death signaling pathways is the main reason for treatment failure [5]. Apoptosis, the major form of cell death, plays an essential role in the maintenance of tissue homeostasis by eliminating unnecessary, damaged and neoplastic cells and defending against pathogenic infections [6,7]. Dysregulation of apoptosis is usually associated with HCC resistance for treatment [8,9]. Therefore, it is essentially important for HCC treatment to find an alternative process that induces cancer cell death.

Recently, scientists have become more interested in autophagy, called type II cell death. Autophagy is a fundamental cell biological process that confers stress tolerance, limits damage, and sustains viability under adverse conditions. Defective autophagy is associated with diverse diseases, including metabolic disorders, idiopathic inflammatory diseases, and cancer [10-14]. Autophagy can either promote or inhibit the growth of cancer cells depending on the cellular context [15]. However, in most cases, autophagy promotes cancer cell survival and sustains cell viability [16,17]. UNC51-like kinase 1 (ULK1), a mammalian serine/threonine protein kinase, plays an essential role in the initiation of autophagy, though the exact molecular mechanisms remain unknown. Aberrant expression of ULK1 was associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [18-20]. Therefore, in the present study, we investigated the expression of ULK1 in HCC and adjacent papacancrous tissues, and evaluated the relationship between expression of ULK1 and clinicopatholgoical features and survival outcome in HCC patients.

Material and methods

Patients

The study was approved by the ethical committees of National Engineering Center for Biochip at Shanghai and Taizhou People’s Hospital. HCC and paracancerous tissues with informed consent were collected between 2006 and 2008 from 55 patients who underwent surgery. Tissue samples were stored at the Biobank Center of National Engineering Center for Biochip at Shanghai. All patients received no anticancer therapy before tumour resection. All patients were pathologically diagnosed with primary HCC.

Tissue microarray (TMA) construction

The formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens were provided by the Biobank Center of National Engineering Center for Biochip at Shanghai. TMA containing 55 paired HCC and matched paracancerous tissues was constructed according to a method described previously [21]. Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E)-stained standard slides from each patient were reviewed by a senior pathologist to determine the locations from which cores should be taken for TMA construction. Two cores of each sample were taken from each region using an automated tissue arrayer (Beecher Instruments, Sun Prarie, WI) described previously [22]. TMA sections (5μm) were cut from the tissue array block. All arrayed sample were stained with H&E to confirm the presence of tumor and paracancerous tissues.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

The IHC staining was performed using TMA slides that were deparaffinized in xylene, rehydrated through a graded alcohol series, washed with Tris-buffered saline, and processed using a streptavidin–biotin–peroxidase complex method. For antigen retrieval, TMA slides were boiled by a pressure cooker in 10 mM sodium citrate buffer (pH 6) for 10 minutes. After quenching of endogenous peroxidase activity and blocking of antibody nonspecific binding, the TMA slides were incubated with anti-ULK1 antibody at a dilution of 1:100 (Abgent, CA, USA) at 4°C overnight in a moist chamber. The slides were treated with corresponding secondary biotinylated rabbit antibody (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) for 30 minutes at 37°C and then washed with Tris-buffered saline. The slides were incubated with StrepAB Complex/horseradish peroxidase (1:100) (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) for 30 minutes at 37°C. Chromogenic immunolocalization was performed by exposure to 0.05% 3,3-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride. The negative control was performed by replacing the primary antibody with normal rabbit IgG. Other cores containing HCC were used as positive controls. Sigma hematoxylin was used as counterstain for IHC.

Sections of each specimen were analyzed by two independent pathologists blinded to the clinicopathological information. In cases of disagreement, a consensus was reached by joint review of slide. ULK1 expression was scored based on the following criteria: 1, 0 points for no staining; 2, 1 point for < 20%; 3, 2 points for 20-75%; 4, 3 points for > 75% of tumor tissue stained, as described previously [23]. The intensity of ULK1 immunoreactivity was graded on a scale of 0 to 3 (0, none; 1, weak, 2, intermediate; and 3 strong). The total score was determined by the following formula: Staining index = intensity X positive rate. In the present study, staining index ≤ 4 was considered low expression, and staining index > 4 was considered as high expression.

Statistical analysis

The association between individual clinicopathological variables and ULK1 expression was statistically analyzed using the X2-test. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to investigate the relationship between ULK1 expression and over survival (OS) in HCC patients. Cox regression model was used to test the independence of risk factors for HCC. Since only one patient was TNM stage IV, we combined TNM stage III and IV groups into one. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were carried out using the SPSS software package (version 17.0). All statistics were two-tailed.

Results

Characteristics of HCC patients

The characteristics of HCC patients enrolled in this study were summarized in Table 1. Among 55 HCC patients, 49 cases are male (89.1%), and 6 cases are female (10.9%). The median age of 55 patients was 54 years (range 38 to 72 years). Histologic grade of HCC was 1, 2, and 3 in 5, 34, and 11 cases, respectively. Forty (72.7%) of them, were stage as TNM stage I, 7 (12.7%) as TNM stage II, 7 (12.7%) as TNM stage III, and 1 (1.8%) were TNM stage IV. Twenty-one patients (38.2%) were also suffering from liver cirrhosis. The median tumor size was 5.5 cm (range 1 to 30 cm).

Table 1.

Clinicopathological characteristics of HCC patients

Characteristics No. of Patients %
Age (years)
    median 54
    range 38-72
Sex
    female 6 10.9
    male 49 89.1
Cirrhosis
    Yes 21 38.2
    No 34 61.8
Histologic grade
    I 5 9.1
    II 34 61.8
    III 11 20.0
    unknown 4 9.1
TNM
    I 40 72.7
    II 7 12.7
    III 7 12.7
    IV 1 1.8
Tumor size (cm)
    median 5.5
    range (cm) 1-30

The expression of ULK1 in HCC and paracanerous tissues

IHC staining for ULK1 was found in all HCC and adjacent tissues (Figure 1). The localization of the ULK1 protein was cytoplasm in all of hepatocytes and HCC cells. However, nuclear localization of ULK1 was rarely observed in HCC cells. Although not statistically significant, the expression of ULK1 in adjacent peritumoural tissues was lower than those in HCC tissues (P = 0.113). Furthermore, no difference was observed in the cirrhotic tissues adjacent to HCC compared with inflammatory tissues adjacent to HCC.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Differential expression of ULK1 in HCC and adjacent noncancerous tissues.

The relationship between expression of ULK1 and clinicopathological characteristics of HCC patients

To investigate the association between clinicopathological characteristics and ULK1 staining in cancer tissue, immunohistochemical staining index was analyzed to examine the relationship. The ULK1 was highly expressed in 39 HCC tissues. The analysis showed that expression level of ULK1 was significantly associated with tumor size (P = 0.017) (Table 2). The difference remain significant even after adjusted for age, sex, histologic grade, cirrhosis and TNM (P = 0.015). No other significant difference was observed between expression of ULK1 and clinicopathological features.

Table 2.

Association between ULK1 expression and clinicopathological features

Variables ULK1 expression

Low High P value
Age (years)
  < 50 9 8 0.011
  ≥ 50 7 30
Gender
  female 3 3 0.232
  male 13 36
Size
  < 4 9 9 0.017
  ≥ 4 7 30
Cirrhosis
  Yes 7 14 0.586
  No 9 25
Histologic grade
  I 2 3 0.225
  II 12 22
  III 1 10
TNM
  I 12 28 0.422
  II 3 4
  III + IV 1 7

Survival analysis

The median survival time was 32 months. Kaplan Meier curve showed a significant correlation between low expression levels of ULK1 in HCC and overall survival (OS). Patients with low ULK1 expression had longer survival time than those with high ULK1 expression (P = 0.033) (Figure 2). Cox regression was used to analyze the relationship between ULK1 expression and OS. At invariable Cox regression, age, sex, histologic grade, cirrhosis, long diameter of tumor and TNM were not associated with survival time. As shown in Table 3, patients with high ULK1 expression showed a hazard rate (HR) of 2.684 (95% CI 1.029–7.006, P = 0.044).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival for patients with HCC.

Table 3.

Cox regression analysis of overall survival

Features HR (95% CI) P value
age 1.031 (0.474-2.240) 0.939
sex 1.404 (0.491-4.020) 0.527
tumor size 1.045 (0.999-1.094) 0.054
cirrhosis 0.852 (0.413-1.757) 0.665
histologic grade 1.950 (0.950-4.001) 0.069
TNM 1.551 (0.996-2.416) 0.052
ULK1 2.684 (1.029-7.006) 0.044

Discussion

In the present study, we demonstrated that the expression of ULK1 was overexpressed in HCC and cancerous tissues. We found that high expression level of ULK1 was related to tumor size and worse survival time in patients with HCC. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report that has revealed the relationship between ULK1 expression and prognosis of HCC patients.

The newly described links between autophagy and macromolecules metabolism in liver suggests that alteration in autophagic function may play a role in the pathophysiology of liver disorders. The prototypic functions of autophagy are to recycle essential nutrients and provide energy for survival during nutrient and oxygen deprivation and other stressful conditions. In the present study, ULK1 was expressed in HCC, as well as cirrhotic and inflammatory tissues adjacent to HCC. The expression levels of ULK1 in HCC was weakly higher than those in paracancerous tissue, indicating that HCC cells had a high demand for nutrients and oxygen to maintain their high proliferation rate, especially if the tumor was large. This means that although liver has a very rich blood supply, there is also a certain degree of deprivation of nutrient and energy in liver cancer cell. Therefore, cancer cells have a high level of ULK1 expression to effectively promote autophagy initiation and protect them against both apoptosis and necrosis. This might provide a better understanding of why patients with larger tumor have a high expression of ULK1.

For cancer therapy, either conventional radiotherapy and chemotherapy, or recent target therapy, the main purpose is to reduce the energy supply of cancer cell. Therefore, under metabolic stress, the residual cancer cells become fragile. However, even if there is a huge metabolic stress, cancer cells rely on autophagy to survive and maintain their activity. Since almost every therapeutic regimen can induce autophagy in cancer cells, many studies support the role of autophagy in cancer cell resistance to treatment [24,25]. Therefore, if the protective effect of autophagy is inhibited, cancer cells will not be able to effectively respond to metabolic stress and then die. This is particularly effective for cancer cells with defective apoptosis. In vitro and in vivo studies have shown that inhibiting the activity of autophagy with autophagic inhibitor increased the anticancer effect of standard therapy in a variety of cancer types [14,25]. Several aberrant expressions of autophagy-related proteins were reported to be associated with prognosis for some cancers [26-30]. In the present study, we found that high ULK1 expression means worse survival time for patients with HCC. Jiang et al. also found that the expression level of ULK1 is inversely related to survival time of patient with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [20]. However, breast cancer patients with high ULK1 expressions have longer survival time [31]. These results indicate that autophagy may play different roles in different types of cancer. In the present study, ULK1 was highly expressed in HCC, indicated high level of autophagy activity in HCC. Autophagy may a main cause of higher resistance to treatment in HCC and thus represent a novel therapeutic target. A more detailed investigation of overexpression of ULK1 in the progression of HCC may eventually lead to the development of improved strategies/therapies for HCC.

In conclusion, our results, for the first time, revealed that ULK1 represents a potential novel prognostic biomarker for HCC. However, further studies are needed to clarify the exact role of ULK1 in carcinogenesis and progression of HCC.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the 12th Five-Year Plan Key Project of Science and Technology, China (No. 2013ZX10002007).

References

  • 1.Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM, editors. GLOBOCAN 2008 v2.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 10 [Internet] Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2010. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Center MM, Jemal A. International trends in liver cancer incidence rates. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:2362–2368. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Perz JF, Armstrong GL, Farrington LA, Hutin YJ, Bell BP. The contributions of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infections to cirrhosis and primary liver cancer worldwide. J Hepatol. 2006;45:529–538. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2006.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Melet A, Song K, Bucur O, Jagani Z, Grassian AR, Khosravi-Far R. Apoptotic pathways in tumor progression and therapy. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2008;615:47–79. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6554-5_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Plati J, Bucur O, Khosravi-Far R. Apoptotic cell signaling in cancer progression and therapy. Integr Biol (Camb) 2011;3:279–296. doi: 10.1039/c0ib00144a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mondello C, Scovassi AI. Apoptosis: a way to maintain healthy individuals. Subcell Biochem. 2010;50:307–323. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-3471-7_16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ling X, Wen L, Zhou Y. Role of mitochondrial translocation of telomerase in hepatocellular carcinoma cells with multidrug resistance. Int J Med Sci. 2012;9:545–554. doi: 10.7150/ijms.4648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Huo X, Zhang Q, Liu AM, Tang C, Gong Y, Bian J, Luk JM, Xu Z, Chen J. Overexpression of Yes-associated protein confers doxorubicin resistance in hepatocellullar carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2013;29:840–846. doi: 10.3892/or.2012.2176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mizushima N, Levine B, Cuervo AM, Klionsky DJ. Autophagy fights disease through cellular self-digestion. Nature. 2008;451:1069–1075. doi: 10.1038/nature06639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Levine B, Mizushima N, Virgin HW. Autophagy in immunity and inflammation. Nature. 2011;469:323–335. doi: 10.1038/nature09782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Levine B, Kroemer G. Autophagy in the pathogenesis of disease. Cell. 2008;132:27–42. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Murrow L, Debnath J. Autophagy as a Stress-Response and Quality-Control Mechanism: Implications for Cell Injury and Human Disease. Annu Rev Pathol. 2013;8:105–137. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-020712-163918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Carew JS, Kelly KR, Nawrocki ST. Autophagy as a target for cancer therapy: new developments. Cancer Manag Res. 2012;4:357–365. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S26133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cheong H, Lu C, Lindsten T, Thompson CB. Therapeutic targets in cancer cell metabolism and autophagy. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30:671–678. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Amaravadi RK, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Yin XM, Weiss WA, Takebe N, Timmer W, DiPaola RS, Lotze MT, White E. Principles and current strategies for targeting autophagy for cancer treatment. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:654–666. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Amaravadi RK, Yu D, Lum JJ, Bui T, Christophorou MA, Evan GI, Thomas-Tikhonenko A, Thompson CB. Autophagy inhibition enhances therapy-induced apoptosis in a Myc-induced model of lymphoma. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:326–336. doi: 10.1172/JCI28833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tang J, Deng R, Luo RZ, Shen GP, Cai MY, Du ZM, Jiang S, Yang MT, Fu JH, Zhu XF. Low expression of ULK1 is associated with operable breast cancer progression and is an adverse prognostic marker of survival for patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;134:549–560. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2080-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pike LR, Singleton DC, Buffa F, Abramczyk O, Phadwal K, Li JL, Simon AK, Murray JT, Harris AL. Transcriptional up-regulation of ULK1 by ATF4 contributes to cancer cell survival. Biochem J. 2013;449:389–400. doi: 10.1042/BJ20120972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jiang S, Li Y, Zhu YH, Wu XQ, Tang J, Li Z, Feng GK, Deng R, Li DD, Luo RZ, Zhang MF, Qin W, Wang X, Jia WH, Zhu XF. Intensive expression of UNC-51-like kinase 1 is a novel biomarker of poor prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 2011;102:1568–1575. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.01964.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.He C, Jiang H, Geng S, Sheng H, Shen X, Zhang X, Zhu S, Chen X, Yang C, Gao H. Expression of c-Myc and Fas correlates with perineural invasion of pancreatic cancer. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2012;5:339–346. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jiang H, He C, Geng S, Sheng H, Shen X, Zhang X, Li H, Zhu S, Chen X, Yang C, Gao H. RhoT1 and Smad4 are correlated with lymph node metastasis and overall survival in pancreatic cancer. PLoS One. 2012;7:e42234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ohuchida K, Mizumoto K, Ishikawa N, Fujii K, Konomi H, Nagai E, Yamaguchi K, Tsuneyoshi M, Tanaka M. The role of S100A6 in pancreatic cancer development and its clinical implication as a diagnostic marker and therapeutic target. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:7785–7793. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cecconi F, Levine B. The role of autophagy in mammalian development: cell makeover rather than cell death. Dev Cell. 2008;15:344–357. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.08.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Swampillai AL, Salomoni P, Short SC. The Role of Autophagy in Clinical Practice. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2012;24:387–395. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2011.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jo YK, Kim SC, Park IJ, Park SJ, Jin DH, Hong SW, Cho DH, Kim JC. Increased Expression of ATG10 in Colorectal Cancer Is Associated with Lymphovascular Invasion and Lymph Node Metastasis. PLoS One. 2012;7:e52705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Liu GH, Zhong Q, Ye YL, Wang HB, Hu LJ, Qin ZK, Zeng MS, Zeng BH. Expression of beclin 1 in bladder cancer and its clinical significance. Int J Biol Markers. 2012 doi: 10.5301/JBM.2012.9769. Epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Geng QR, Xu DZ, He LJ, Lu JB, Zhou ZW, Zhan YQ, Lu Y. Beclin-1 expression is a significant predictor of survival in patients with lymph node-positive gastric cancer. PLoS One. 2012;7:e45968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhu W, Pan X, Li F, Zhang Y, Lu X. Expression of Beclin 1 and LC3 in FIGO stage I-II cervical squamous cell carcinoma and relationship to survival. Tumour Biol. 2012;33:1653–1659. doi: 10.1007/s13277-012-0421-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Huang J, Liu K, Yu Y, Xie M, Kang R, Vernon P, Cao L, Tang D, Ni J. Targeting HMGB1-mediated autophagy as a novel therapeutic strategy for osteosarcoma. Autophagy. 2012;8:275–277. doi: 10.4161/auto.8.2.18940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Dorsey FC, Rose KL, Coenen S, Prater SM, Cavett V, Cleveland JL, Caldwell-Busby J. Mapping the phosphorylation sites of Ulk1. J Proteome Res. 2009;8:5253–5263. doi: 10.1021/pr900583m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology are provided here courtesy of e-Century Publishing Corporation

RESOURCES