Over the past 50 y, there have been few mechanistically distinct drugs for the treatment of major depressive disorders, despite the fact that nearly two-thirds of patients do not achieve full remission of symptoms on currently available antidepressants (1). In addition, even when adequate remission is achieved, patients require 2–4 wk of treatment before any significant effects, increasing the risk for complications, such as suicide (2). This delay in effectiveness has resulted in a major push to identify and develop novel therapeutics with more rapid effects. The recent identification of ketamine as a rapid antidepressant effective in treatment-resistant patients has been groundbreaking (3, 4). Nasca et al. (5) describe in PNAS a unique potential rapidly acting antidepressant, l-acetylcarnitine (LAC), which is a dietary supplement that acts by acetylating protein targets to control their function. LAC is reported to be well tolerated and can readily cross the blood-brain barrier (6). A recent study suggests it has promise in the treatment of Parkinson disease because of its neroprotective properties (7). Strikingly, LAC exhibits antidepressant efficacy within 2–3 d following intraperitoneal administration in rodents, compared with 2–3 wk with a standard antidepressant treatment, such as chlorimipramine. Although LAC is relatively nonspecific and can target many biological pathways, it is suggested by Nasca et al. (5) to promote rapid antidepressant responses by acetylation of histone proteins that control the transcription of BDNF and metabotropic glutamate 2 (mGlu2) receptors in the hippocampus (Hipp) and prefrontal cortex (PFC) (Fig. 1). One of the more impressive aspects of this article is that Nasca et al. (5) verify rapid antidepressant efficacy of LAC in both a genetic rat model of susceptibility [Flinders Sensitive Line (FSL)] and following chronic stress exposure, factors that are thought to be the primary cause of depression in humans. Although there is clearly far more work necessary to understand the mechanisms of antidepressant action of LAC in rodents, and the dose and relative safety profile for depression treatment in humans, these exciting results are a first step toward that goal.
There is a growing literature suggesting that chronic stress reprograms gene expression in brain regions, such as the Hipp and nucleus accumbens (NAc), and that normalization of the transcriptional machinery through posttranslational modifications of histones can correct some of the aberrant gene transcription and promote antidepressant responses (8). Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors given intraperitoneally (9, 10), as well as directly into the Hipp (11), amygdala (11), and NAc (12, 13), promote antidepressant behavioral responses following stress. In the NAc, HDAC inhibitors have been shown to normalize gene-expression profiles similar to chronic imipramine-treated and control unstressed mice. Work described by Nasca et al. (5) suggests similar mechanisms of action for LAC, whereby increased histone acetylation and normalization of BDNF or mGlu2 in the Hipp and PFC promotes resilience following chronic unpredictable stress, or in the FSL rats. Interestingly, the authors show that normalization of mGlu2 receptor expression through an epigenetic mechanism is functionally related to antidepressant responses (5); HDAC inhibitors normalize mGlu2 expression in FSL rats and LAC has limited antidepressant efficacy in mGlu2 knockout mice. These findings are very interesting; however, there are some important questions to consider. For example, previous work has shown that increased BDNF in the hippocampus is antidepressant (14), but increased BDNF in the mesolimbic dopamine system is prodepressant (15). Does peripheral administration of LAC also increase BDNF transcription in the mesolimbic dopamine system through a similar mechanism, and does this increase the possibility of unwanted side effects or limited efficacy? Furthermore, there are likely many other epigenetic targets across multiple brain areas contributing to the antidepressant behavioral effects of LAC that warrant further investigation.
Nasca et al. (5) point out the possibility that LAC may acetylate transcription factors, such as NFκΒ, to regulate mGlu2 transcription (Fig. 1). Their results suggest that increased acetylation of p65 by LAC is associated with its antidepressant efficacy and that pretreatment with the anti-inflammatory sodium salicylate, which nonselectively inhibits NFκB, blocks the effects of LAC on mGlu2 gene transcription, and partially blocks antidepressant behavioral responses. These findings are somewhat contrary to previous work, which shows that chronic stress increases NFκB-dependent transcription or its upstream kinase, IKK, in the Hipp (16) and NAc (17), respectively. In the Hipp, increased NFκB-dependent transcription promotes stress-impaired neurogenesis, but local administration of a selective NFκB inhibitor prevents stress-impaired neurogenesis and shows antidepressant efficacy on novelty-induced hypophagia and sucrose consumption, which are classic depression and anxiety tests (16). In the NAc, IKK inhibition reverses social defeat stress-induced social-avoidance behavior and synaptic plasticity (17). Thus, although the current findings are intriguing, they raise a number of important questions. First, sodium salicylate acts on many more targets other than NFκB. Is sodium salicylate acting through these other targets to control mGlu2 transcription and antidepressant behavioral responses? The use of more specific NFκB inhibitors or genetic knockouts will be important to determine this. Next, although Nasca et al. (5) mention that the mGlu2 promoter contains a number of NFκB binding sites, it’s unclear whether LAC promotes acetyl-p65 binding to the mGlu2 promoter in vivo and whether this increases mGlu2 transcription.
Finally, it is important to note that LAC is a nonspecific acetylating agent and it is unclear from the present work whether the antidepressant actions are solely a result of acetylation of nuclear proteins, such as transcription factors and histones, or whether it is in part a result of acetylation of other proteins outside the nucleus (Fig. 1). For example, acetylation of microtubules can influence the stability of the neuronal cytoskeleton (18). Chronic stress and genetic models of depression are well-established regulators of the neuronal cytoskeleton, and in the PFC and Hipp, depressive phenotypes have generally been associated with a destabilization of the cytoskeleton and a loss of excitatory glutamatergic synapses (19). Thus, it is tempting to speculate that LAC may affect stability of the cytoskeleton and glutamatergic synapses during times of stress or in genetically predisposed individuals. The possibility that acetylation may affect posttranscriptional processes in stress disorders is not completely speculative. Recent work has identified a role for the histone deactylase, HDAC6, outside the nucleus through its deactylating actions on heat-shock protein 90 (HSP90), a chaperone protein important for protein processing (20). Standard antidepressants down-regulate HDAC levels, resulting in hyperacetylation of HSP90 and subsequent impairment of glucocorticoid receptor processing, which blunts the impact of stress on serotonergic neurons in the dorsal raphe nucleus. Although these two examples highlight the diverse roles of acetylation on the function of neuronal systems, future work to determine the effects of LAC on a host of nonnuclear targets needs further investigation.
Work by Nasca et al. (5) represents the type of basic science research that can help guide the development of novel, more rapidly acting treatments for depression. The identification of rapidly acting antidepressants, like ketamine, has resulted in a much needed major paradigm shift in the discovery process that promises to lead to a new generation of antidepressant therapies.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest statement: D.S.C. and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai have been named on a use patent application of Ketamine for the treatment of depression. If Ketamine was shown to be effective in the treatment of depression and received approval from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for this indication, D.S.C. and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai could benefit financially.
See companion article on page 4804.
References
- 1.Preskorn SH. Ketamine: The hopes and the hurdles. Biol Psychiatry. 2012;72(7):522–523. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.07.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rush AJ, et al. STAR*D: Revising conventional wisdom. CNS Drugs. 2009;23(8):627–647. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200923080-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Berman RM, et al. Antidepressant effects of ketamine in depressed patients. Biol Psychiatry. 2000;47(4):351–354. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00230-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Murrough JW, et al. Rapid and longer-term antidepressant effects of repeated ketamine infusions in treatment-resistant major depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2012 doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.06.022. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.06.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nasca C, et al. l-acetylcarnitine causes rapid antidepressant effects through the epigenetic induction of mGlu2 receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:4804–4809. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1216100110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Barhwal K, et al. Acetyl-l-carnitine (ALCAR) prevents hypobaric hypoxia-induced spatial memory impairment through extracellular related kinase-mediated nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 phosphorylation. Neuroscience. 2009;161(2):501–514. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.02.086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Beal MF. Bioenergetic approaches for neuroprotection in Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol. 2003;53(Suppl 3):S39–S47; discussion S47–S48. doi: 10.1002/ana.10479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tsankova N, Renthal W, Kumar A, Nestler EJ. Epigenetic regulation in psychiatric disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8(5):355–367. doi: 10.1038/nrn2132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Schroeder FA, Lin CL, Crusio WE, Akbarian S. Antidepressant-like effects of the histone deacetylase inhibitor, sodium butyrate, in the mouse. Biol Psychiatry. 2007;62(1):55–64. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.06.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tsankova NM, et al. Sustained hippocampal chromatin regulation in a mouse model of depression and antidepressant action. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9(4):519–525. doi: 10.1038/nn1659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Covington HE, 3rd, Vialou VF, LaPlant Q, Ohnishi YN, Nestler EJ. Hippocampal-dependent antidepressant-like activity of histone deacetylase inhibition. Neurosci Lett. 2011;493(3):122–126. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.02.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Covington HE, 3rd, et al. Antidepressant actions of histone deacetylase inhibitors. J Neurosci. 2009;29(37):11451–11460. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1758-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Golden SA, et al. Epigenetic regulation of RAC1 induces synpatic remodeling in stress disorders and depression. Nat Med. 2013 doi: 10.1038/nm.3090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Shirayama Y, Chen AC, Nakagawa S, Russell DS, Duman RS. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor produces antidepressant effects in behavioral models of depression. J Neurosci. 2002;22(8):3251–3261. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-08-03251.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Berton O, et al. Essential role of BDNF in the mesolimbic dopamine pathway in social defeat stress. Science. 2006;311(5762):864–868. doi: 10.1126/science.1120972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Koo JW, Russo SJ, Ferguson D, Nestler EJ, Duman RS. Nuclear factor-kappaB is a critical mediator of stress-impaired neurogenesis and depressive behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(6):2669–2674. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910658107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Christoffel DJ, et al. IκB kinase regulates social defeat stress-induced synaptic and behavioral plasticity. J Neurosci. 2011;31(1):314–321. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4763-10.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sudo H, Baas PW. Acetylation of microtubules influences their sensitivity to severing by katanin in neurons and fibroblasts. J Neurosci. 2010;30(21):7215–7226. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0048-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Christoffel DJ, Golden SA, Russo SJ. Structural and synaptic plasticity in stress-related disorders. Rev Neurosci. 2011;22(5):535–549. doi: 10.1515/RNS.2011.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Espallergues J, et al. HDAC6 regulates glucocorticoid receptor signaling in serotonin pathways with critical impact on stress resilience. J Neurosci. 2012;32(13):4400–4416. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5634-11.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]