Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 25.
Published in final edited form as: Head Neck. 2011 Nov 11;34(8):1143–1146. doi: 10.1002/hed.21893

Free Tissue Transfer for Head and Neck Reconstruction in Solid Organ Transplant Patients

Matthew W Miller 1, Nichole R Dean 1, Steven B Cannady 1, Eben L Rosenthal 1, Mark K Wax 1
PMCID: PMC3607204  NIHMSID: NIHMS428668  PMID: 22076843

Abstract

Background

Patients with head and neck malignancies who have had solid organ transplant and require free tissue transfer are a unique population. This study was performed to evaluate the effect of immunosuppression on the rate of perioperative complications and the success of free tissue transfer in the head and neck.

Methods

Complications in solid organ transplant patients undergoing free tissue transfer for reconstruction of head and neck malignancies from 1998–2010 were evaluated.

Results

A total of 22 flaps in 17 patients were performed. Eight patients (11/22 flaps) had complications. The median hospital stay was 6 days (range, 4–26 days). The median length of follow-up was 13.5 months (range, 3.5–49.9 months).

Conclusions

Solid organ transplant patients are at an increased risk of de novo malignancies due to chronic immunosuppression. This study demonstrates that free tissue transfer is a viable option in transplant patients with morbidity similar to nontransplant patients.

Keywords: Free flap, free tissue transfer, head and neck reconstruction, organ transplant, immunosuppression

Introduction

Solid organ transplant patients with head and neck malignancies requiring free tissue transfer are a unique population. The number of solid organ transplants in the U.S. increased by 29% from 1998–2007 (SRTR).1 Patient 5-year graft survival rates following single solid organ transplantation range from 36.3–80.7% (SRTR) and continue to increase. The use of immunosuppressive agents increases the risk of de novo malignancy, including cutaneous malignancies.25 There is a cumulative risk of cutaneous malignancy reported at 5% per year.6 The increasing number of organ transplants and rates of graft survival will likely lead to greater rates of de novo malignancies. Organ transplant patients with head and neck malignancies occasionally require free tissue transfer for reconstruction of large defects.

The presence of comorbidities potentially affecting wound healing is an important consideration in the preoperative work-up.7 Potential factors that may compromise wound healing include smoking, diabetes, malnutrition, previous irradiation, and immunosuppression.810 Initiation of the inflammatory cascade is an essential step in wound healing. Immunosuppression has been shown to affect wound healing through inhibition of necessary inflammatory mediators.11 A recent study of free tissue transfer in solid organ transplant patients was performed, but the majority of the reconstruction sites were in distal extremities (11/19) with relatively few head and neck patients (5/19).12 This study was performed to evaluate the effect of immunosuppression on the rate of perioperative complications and success of free tissue transfer in the head and neck.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of all solid organ transplant patients undergoing elective free tissue transfer for head and neck malignancies between 1998–2010 at Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU) and the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB). Institutional review board approval was obtained at the respective institutions. Seventeen patients were identified and included in the study. Eleven patients were identified at OHSU and six patients at UAB. Patient age at the time of surgery, gender, primary malignancy, tumor stage, type of free flap reconstruction, transplanted organ(s), immunosuppression regimen, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and length of postoperative follow-up were evaluated. Complication outcomes included: flap failure, partial flap necrosis, wound infection, donor site or recipient site complications, hematoma, and seroma. Major complications were categorized as those requiring operative intervention or contributing to a prolonged hospital course.

Results

Seventeen patients had free tissue transfer following resection of head and neck malignancies. The median age of patients at the time of surgery was 62 years (range, 18–78 years) and a majority of patients were male (71%). Solid organ transplantation varied, with renal transplants comprising the majority of patients (65%) [Table I]. Patients had oral cavity SCC (29%), cutaneous SCC (47%), malignant fibrous histiocytoma (12%), basal cell carcinoma (6%), and spindle cell carcinoma (6%). The majority of flaps (59%) were performed following ablation of advanced T classification tumors, T3 or T4 [Table II]. Among the oral cavity SCC group, two patients were TNM stage II and three patients were stage III/IVa. The cutaneous SCC group had two patients with stage II, seven with stage III, and one patient with stage IV disease. In addition, 27% of flaps were performed for recurrent lesions. A total of 22 flaps were performed, with three patients receiving two flaps, and one patient receiving three flaps. A representative case is provided in Figure 1, with anterolateral thigh free flap reconstruction of a x by x cm defect following WLE. The majority of flaps used for reconstruction were radial forearm (36%) and anterolateral thigh flaps (32%) [Table III]. Most patients (59%) had extensive tumor resections, with wide local excision in addition to concurrent ablative surgery [Table IV]. The types of immunosuppressive medications used are listed in Table V. Only one patient was not on an immunosuppressive regimen at the time of free tissue transfer. There were postoperative complications in eight patients and 11/22 (50%) flaps [Table VI]. Of these complications, 45% were considered major and occurred in 24% of patients. Previous irradiation to the recipient site was present in 36% of all patients, and in 45% of flaps experiencing complications. The median hospital stay was 6 days (range, 4–26 days). There was not a significant difference between the mean hospital stay in the patient group experiencing flap complications (7.9 – 6.2 days) when compared to those not experiencing complications (6.1 – 1.2, p = 0.35). The median length of follow-up was 13.5 months (range, 3.5–49.9 months). Survival was 29.4% at the time of last follow-up, with the deceased cohort surviving a median of 14.4 months (range, 3.2–49.9 months).

Table I.

Type of Organ Transplant

Organ Transplanted No. of Patients %
Kidney 11 65
Liver 4 24
Heart 2 12
Lung 1 6

Table II.

T Classification of Tumors

T Classification No. of Patients %
Tx 1 5
T1 0 0
T2 3 14
T3 3 14
T4 10 45
*

Not included are three patients that had flaps for Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma (no TNM staging system exists) and one patient that had two flaps due to osteoradionecrosis

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1

A representative patient case is demonstrated. (A) A cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma is shown. Evidence of previous left ear surgery and malpositioning is seen. (B) A large soft-tissue defect is present following wide local excision. (C) Early post-operative follow-up with bulky soft tissue present prior to atrophy.

Table III.

Type of Flap

Flap No. of Patients %
Radial forearm 8 36
Anterolateral thigh 7 32
Latissimus dorsi 3 14
Fibula 2 9
Rectus abdominus 1 5
Lateral arm 1 5

Table IV.

Ablative Procedures In Addition To WLE

Flap No. of Patients %
Parotidectomy 5 23
Segmental Mandibulectomy 5 23
Temporal bone resection 3 14
Total auriculectomy 2 9
Orbital exenteration 1
Maxillectomy 1 5

WLE; wide local excision

Table V.

Immunosuppressive Medications

Type of Immunosuppression No. of Patients %
Prednisone 15 88
Cyclosporine 7 41
Tacrolimus 6 35
Mycophenolate mofetil 4 24
Azathioprine 3 18
Sirolimus 2 12

Table VI.

Postoperative Complications

Patient Age Type of Flap Primary
Disease
Complication Immunosuppression
1 51 ALT Oral SCC Wound infection Siro, Prednisone
51 Fibula Flap failure
53 Radial forearm Donor site tendon exposure

2 51 Lateral arm Oral SCC Donor site dehiscence None

3 53 Latissimus dorsi MFH Donor site seroma Siro, Prednisone

4 78 ALT Cutaneous SCC Partial flap necrosis CyA, Prednisone

5 61 Radial forearm Cutaneous SCC Hematoma Tac, AZA, Prednisone
62 ALT Wound infection

6 66 Radial forearm Cutaneous SCC Hematoma Tac, Prednisone

7 69 ALT Spindle cell carcinoma Hematoma MMF, Tac, Prednisone

8 67 Radial forearm MFH Wound infection MMF, Tac, Prednisone

Discussion

Solid organ transplant patients are at an increased risk of de novo malignancies due to chronic immunosuppression.26 These patients will occasionally require free tissue transfer for coverage of large defects.13 Overall published free tissue transfer failure rates are 1–9%,14 but there are limited reports on failure rates in patients on immunosuppressive regiments. The flap failure rate in the current study is 4.5%.

Though there is a low rate of overall flap failure, a higher rate of complications exists. The impact of flap failure in the current series is demonstrated by Patient 1, who suffered multiple complications and hospitalizations. She had complications associated with all three free flap reconstructions. The last two free flaps were performed in an irradiated surgical field. In addition, she had a failed pedicled latissimus flap and wound dehiscence following a pedicled pectoralis flap. This resulted in a mean hospital stay of 13 days compared to the overall average hospital stay of 7 days.

Postoperative complications are common in the overall free tissue transfer population, with a recently reported rate of 29–33.5% in reconstruction of head and neck patients.10;15 A recent multicenter case series evaluating free tissue transfer in the solid organ transplant population had a complication rate of 42%, though the majority of flaps were performed on extremities in patients with peripheral vascular disease and diabetes.12 This group of patients also had an average hospital stay of 10.5 days compared to 7.0 days in our cohort. This may indicate a population with greater comorbidities, including peripheral vascular disease and diabetes. The reason for free tissue transfer was not fully described. Some patients received free tissue transfer following malignancy extirpation, while others received flaps for treatment of chronic wounds. The mean follow-up was 6.8 years compared to 17.2 months in our cohort. The patients included in the current study represent a different patient population with respect to comAnother study by Moran et al. analyzed the contribution of renal failure and uremia-induced immunosuppression on free tissue transfer complications and survival.16 They had a 6% rate of primary free flap failure, with several other patients subsequently losing flaps to complications of progressive lower extremity ischemia. They noted immediate postoperative complications in 44% of their patients. They also had a high rate of diabetes (88%) and peripheral vascular disease (84%), compared to a diabetes rate of 24% in our cohort. Our study has a similar complication rate in head and neck patients treated with immunosuppressive medications.

Patient selection for free flap reconstruction includes assessment of comorbidities that may affect wound healing, including the immunosuppression regimen of solid organ transplant patients. Postoperative wound complications are reported to be increased with the use of rapamycin (sirolimus) compared to mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus and cyclosporine-based regimens.1718 The increase of wound complications and lymphocele formation in patients on sirolimus is in exchange for decreased acute graft rejection and potential decreased risk of de novo malignancy. Only 10.8% of kidney transplant patients from 2006 had sirolimus included in their immunosuppressive regimen at one-year follow-up.1 Though only two patients in the current cohort were on sirolimus, both experienced postoperative flap complications, including one seroma.

Other factors that may affect the rate of complications in our cohort include the presence of previous irradiation, compromising the vascularity of the recipient site. Yu et al. examined the outcomes of 1266 patients and reported a rate of radiation prior to free tissue transfer in 44% of patients.19 They found no significant difference in the rates of free flap failure between the non-irradiated and radiated groups. The rate of other complications, such as wound infection, wound dehiscence, hematoma, and seroma was not specifically addressed. There is a reported significant increase in postoperative complications in patients having prior irradiation to the free tissue recipient site.9 Cohn et al. found a major complication rate of 66% in 35 patients who had a second round of radiation therapy prior to reconstruction.20 The overall flap success rate was 94%.

Conclusion

Though there was a 50% postoperative flap complication rate, there was only a 4.5% flap failure rate. Of the complications experienced, 45% were considered major and occurred in 24% of patients. The majority of our patients presented with aggressive disease, resulting in significant ablative defects and poor survival. Free tissue transfer for reconstruction of complex head and neck defects is a viable option in transplant patients with failure rates similar to nontransplant patients.

Acknowledgments

This study was performed at Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, U.S.A. and at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, U.S.A. No grants or additional financial support were utilized for this study.

Footnotes

Presented at the Triological Society 113th Annual Meeting at COSM, Las Vegas, Nevada, U.S.A., April 30-May 1, 2010.

The authors have no conflicts of interest or financial disclosures.

References

  • 1.2008 OPTN/SRTR Annual Report 1998–2007. HHS/HRSA/HSB/DOT.
  • 2.Hung YM, Chou KJ, Hung SY, Chung HM, Chang JC. De novo malignancies after kidney transplantation. Urology. 2007;69(6):1041–1044. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.02.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wimmer CD, Rentsch M, Crispin A, et al. The janus face of immunosuppression – de novo malignancy after renal transplantation: the experience of the Transplantation Center Munich. Kidney Int. 2007;71:1271–1278. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kauffman HM, Cherikh WS, Cheng Y, Hanto DW, Kahan BD. Maintenance immunosuppression with target-of-rapamycin inhibitors is associated with a reduced incidence of de novo malignancies. Transplantation. 2005;80(7):883–889. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000184006.43152.8d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tessari G, Naldi L, Boschiero L, et al. Incidence and clinical predictors of a subsequent nonmelanoma skin cancer in solid organ transplant recipients with a first nonmelanoma skin cancer: a multicenter cohort study. Arch Dermatol. 2010;146(3):294–299. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2009.377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Urwin HR, Jones PW, Harden PN, et al. Predicting risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer and premalignant skin lesions in renal transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2009;87(11):1667–1671. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181a5ce2e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rosenthal EL, Dixon SF. Free flap complications: when is enough, enough? Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;11(4):236–239. doi: 10.1097/00020840-200308000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Smith RB, Sniezek JC, Weed DT, Wax MK. Microvascular Surgery Subcommittee of American Academy of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery. Utilization of free tissue transfer in head and neck surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;137(2):182–191. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Klug C, Berzaczy D, Reinbacher H, et al. Influence of previous radiotherapy on free tissue transfer in the head and neck region: evaluation of 455 cases. Laryngoscope. 2006;116(7):1162–1167. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000227796.41462.a1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bozikov K, Arnez ZM. Factors predicting free flap complications in head and neck reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59(7):737–742. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2005.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Schaffer M, Schier R, Napirei M, Michalski S, Traska T, Viebahn R. Sirolimus impairs wound healing. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2007;392(3):297–303. doi: 10.1007/s00423-007-0174-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lee AB, Dupin CL, Colen L, Jones NF, May JW, Chiu ES. Microvascular free tissue transfer in organ transplantation patients: is it safe? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(6):1986–1992. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31817123b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wax MK, Burkey BB, Bascom D, Rosenthal EL. The role of free tissue transfer in the reconstruction of massive neglected skin cancers of the head and neck. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2003;5(6):479–482. doi: 10.1001/archfaci.5.6.479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bui DT, Cordeiro PG, Hu QY, Disa JJ, Pusic A, Mehrara BJ. Free flap reexploration: indications, treatment, and outcomes in 1193 free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(7):2092–2100. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000260598.24376.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Monroe MM, McClelland J, Swide C, Wax MK. Vasopressor use in free tissue transfer surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;142(2):169–173. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2009.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Moran SL, Salgado CJ, Serletti JM. Free tissue transfer in patients with renal disease. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113(7):2006–2011. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000122214.55090.16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Knight RJ, Villa M, Laskey R, et al. Risk factors for impaired wound healing in sirolimus-treated renal transplant recipients. Clin Transplant. 2007;21(4):460–465. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2007.00668.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zakliczynski M, Nozynski J, Kocher A, et al. Surgical wound-healing complications in heart transplant recipients treated with rapamycin. Wound Repair Regen. 2007;15(3):316–321. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00232.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yu P, Chang DW, Miller MJ, Reece G, Robb GL. Analysis of 49 cases of flap compromise in 1310 free flaps for head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck. 2009;31(1):45–51. doi: 10.1002/hed.20927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cohn AB, Lang PO, Agarwal JP, et al. Free-flap reconstruction in the doubly irradiated patient population. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122(1):125–132. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181773d39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES