Skip to main content
Gut and Liver logoLink to Gut and Liver
. 2013 Mar 14;7(2):221–227. doi: 10.5009/gnl.2013.7.2.221

Lipoic Acid Prevents the Changes of Intracellular Lipid Partitioning by Free Fatty Acid

Dong Chan Kim *, Dae Won Jun *,, Eun Chul Jang , Sang Heum Kim , Eun Kyung Kim §, Sang Pyo Lee *, Kang Nyeong Lee *, Hang Lak Lee *, Oh Young Lee *, Byung Chul Yoon *, Ho Soon Choi *
PMCID: PMC3607777  PMID: 23560159

Abstract

Background/Aims

It is suggested that the hepatic lipid composition is more important than lipid quantity in the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. We examined whether lipoic acid (LA) could alter intrahepatic lipid composition and free cholesterol distribution.

Methods

HepG2 cells were cultured with palmitic acid (PA) with and without LA. Apoptosis, changes of the mitochondrial structure, intracellular lipid partitioning, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) activity were measured.

Results

Free fatty acid (FA) increased apoptosis, and LA co-treatment prevented this lipotoxicity (apoptosis in controls vs PA vs PA+LA, 0.5% vs 19.5% vs 1.6%, p<0.05). LA also restored the intracellular mitochondrial DNA copy number (553±33.8 copies vs 291±14.55 copies vs 421±21.05 copies, p<0.05) and reversed the morphological changes induced by PA. In addition, ROS was increased in response to PA and was decreased in response to LA co-treatment (41,382 relative fluorescence unit [RFU] vs 43,646 RFU vs 41,935 RFU, p<0.05). LA co-treatment increased the monounsaturated and polyunsaturated FA concentrations and decreased the total saturated FA fraction. It also prevented the movement of intracellular free cholesterol from the cell membrane to the cytoplasm.

Conclusions

LA opposes free FA-generated lipotoxicity by altering the intracellular lipid composition and free cholesterol distribution.

Keywords: Thioctic acid, Lipotoxicity, Lipid partitioning, Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, Liver cirrhosis

INTRODUCTION

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is caused by the extensive accumulation of lipids in the liver, which gradually leads to lipotoxicity and oxidative stress, and eventually to cell apoptosis.1-3 Triglycerides, the dominant type of lipid in NASH patients, were thought to be the main cause of NASH.4-9 However, recent studies have shown that they may actually protect the liver from inflammation and oxidative damage by storing excess fatty acids (FAs).10 Other studies in human subjects have also found no relationship between the hepatic concentration of triglycerides and insulin resistance.11 This suggests that other lipids, such as free FAs (FFAs) and free cholesterol, may be more important in terms of lipotoxicity.12 This idea, referred to as the 'lipid partitioning theory,' suggests that the nature of the accumulated lipids rather than their quantity is important in the pathogenesis of NASH.

Saturated FAs (SFAs) have been found to be more effective in producing oxidative stress than unsaturated FAs (UFAs), due to the high SFA-oxidizing capacity of the liver. It is also thought that stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 (SCD-1) plays a key role in controlling the ratio of UFAs to SFAs in the liver, and this could affect not only the control of diabetes mellitus and cholesterol levels but also NASH.13,14 In addition to FAs, free cholesterol has been shown to increase susceptibility to lipotoxic effects. Therefore, in addition to the UFA: SFA ratio, the cellular distribution of free cholesterol should be considered as a factor influencing oxidative stress and lipotoxicity. However, according to Mari et al.,15 if mitochondria are loaded with free cholesterol, FFAs increase the frequency of apoptosis.

Lipoic acid (LA) is a free radical scavenger that can regenerate endogenous antioxidants, such as vitamin E.16 As it is soluble in water and lipid, water soluble antioxidants (e.g., vitamin C) are found in the cell cytoplasm, and fat soluble antioxidants (e.g., vitamin E) are found on the cell membrane. This means that LA can act both inside the cell and on the cell membrane and so provide dual protection. It has protective activity in both reduced and oxidized form,17 and the reduced form, dihydrolipoic acid is more effective as an antioxidant. Animal foods (mainly in liver and muscle) have high LA contents (range, 0.55 to 2.36 ppm),17,18 whereas plant foods contains very little (0.09 ppm) or no detectable LA.19

As an antioxidant, LA can be very effective aganinst a variety of diseases. LA supplementation has been found to be beneficial in preventing diabetic neuropathy, and may also be effective against diseases such as liver cirrhosis, diabetic nephropathy, multiple sclerosis, and Alzheimer's disease.20

LA can reduce the accumulation of fat in the liver by inhibiting sterol regulatory element binding protein-1c and blocking transforming growth factor-beta.13,14 Moreover, it has important effects on both apoptosis and proliferation.21 However, its impact on lipid partitioning has not been studied. The aim of our experiments was to examine the effect of LA on free cholesterol distribution and types of FFA found in hepatocytes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

1. Cell culture and treatment

The human hepatoma cell line HepG2 was cultured under 5% CO2 and 95% O2 in RPMI 1640 medium (GIBCO, Grand Island, NY, USA), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 units/mL of penicillin and 100 mg/mL of streptomycin (control group). Lipotoxicity was induced by incubation with 300 µM palmitic acid (PA; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 24 hours (PA group). For LA (Sigma-Aldrich) treatment, the cells were co-incubated with different concentration of LA (10, 100, and 1,000 µM) and 300 µM PA for 24 hours (PA+LA group).

2. Electron microscopy

Cells were pre-fixed at 0℃ to 4℃ in a 2.5% glutaraldehyde solution and washed with 0.1 M phosphate buffer. They were post-fixed in 1% of OsO4 for 2 hours and washed with buffer. After ethanol dehydration, they were placed in propylene oxide and embedded in Epon, which was polymerized at 37℃ for 12 hours, 45℃ for 12 hours, and 60℃ for 48 hours. The tissue was cut into 0.5 µm-thick sections, double stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and observed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, H-7100; Hitachi-High Technologies Co., Tokyo, Japan).

3. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

Total RNA was analyzed with RNA-Bee solution (Tel-Test, Friendswood, TX, USA). Complementary DNA was synthesized by the first-strand cDNA synthesis method. PCR mixtures contained 2 mL of cDNA, 5 mL of 10×PCR buffer solution (100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, 500 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2), 4 mL of 2.5 mM dNTP, 20 pmol of primers (GAPDH forward primer; CCA GGT GGT CTC CTC TGA CTT C, GAPDH reverse primer; Primers and probes were as follows: GTG GTC GTT GAG GGC AAT G, mitochondria forward primer; CCA GCG TCT CGC AAT GCT, mitochondria reverse primer; CTC CAT GCA TTT GGT ATT TTC G, mitochondria probe; FAM-TCG CGT GCA CAC CCC CCA-TAMRA, GAPDH probe; FAM-ACA GCG ACA CCC ACT CCT CCA CCT T-TAMRA.), and 1 unit of AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase (Roche, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), adjusted to a final concentration of 50 mL. Amplification cycles consisted of denaturation for 5 minutes at 94℃, then the mixtures underwent denaturation for 30 seconds at 94℃, annealing for 30 seconds at 60℃, and extension for 5 minutes at 72℃. In total, 40 cycles were conducted. Relative mitochondrial copy number was calculated as 2ΔCT (ΔCT equals CtGAPDH-CtmtDNA).

4. Gas chromatography

Collected cells were centrifuged for 10 minutes at 300 g, sonicated in 5 mL of 0.025 M Tris/0.3 M sucrose buffer (pH 7.6), and centrifuged for 20 minutes at 15,000 g. The pellet was removed and only the top layer of the solution was centrifuged at 190,000 g (ca. 650,000 rpm) for 1 hour at 4℃ (Beckman rotor, TLC 100.3). The isolated cell membrane fraction was placed in a 2 mL vial with 250 µL of boron trifluoride methanol-benzene (B1252; Sigma-Aldrich), heated for 10 minutes at 100℃ in a sand bath, cooled at room temperature, and mixed for 30 seconds with 250 µL of HPLC-reagent water and 250 µL of HPLC-grade hexane. It was then centrifuged for 3 minutes at 3,000 rpm. The hexane layer was removed and placed in a 12×32 gas chromatography vial with a glass insert, and analyzed by gas chromatography (Shimadzu 2010AF; Shimadzu Scientific Instrument, Kyoto, Japan) using a capillary column (SP2560; Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA). To analyze FA composition, we used a standard mixture (GLC-727; Nu-Check Prep, Elysian, MN, USA) and calculated the differences between batches. To ensure test accuracy, the same blood sample was used as control for each batch.

5. Confocal microscopy

HepG2 cells were fixed in 0.1 M phosphate buffer for 10 minutes with 3.7% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized in bovine serum albumin/phosphate buffered saline (PBS) buffer with 0.1% saponin. The cells were stained with 50 mg/mL of filipin for 2 hours, washed with PBS 0.0025% saponin, and treated with secondary antibodies for 45 minutes. All the staining procedures were conducted in a darkroom.

6. Reactive oxygen species (ROS)

Following administration of PA or the combination of PA+LA, ROS were measured after 5 hours. We used a commercial ROS detection kit (Invitrogen, Eugene, OR, USA) according to the manufacture's recommendations. After removing the medium, 10 µM CM-H2DCFDA dissolved in 20 µL of phenol-red-free medium was added to the wells; they were then incubated at 37℃ and washed 3 times with 50 mL PBS per well. Fluorescence was measured at excitation/emission (ex/em) wavelengths of 485/530 nm.

7. Data analysis

All data are expressed as mean±standard deviation. Differences between groups were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by the Kruskal-Wallis test to correct for multiple comparisons and the chi-square test. Differences were considered statistically significant at p<0.05.

RESULTS

1. Inhibition of FFA-induced apoptosis by LA

TUNEL assays showed that the PA-treated cells had a higher rate of apoptosis than the normal controls (control:PA, 0.5%:19.5%, p<0.05), and apoptosis was greatly attenuated in the PA+LA co-treatment group compare to PA group (PA:PA+LA 10 µM; 19.5%:1.6%, p<0.05). As 10 µM LA had the highest anti-apoptotic effect, we used it in all subsequent experiments (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Apoptosis induced by palmitic acid (PA) is decreased by lipoic acid (LA). Data are presented as mean±SD (n=5 in each group). Control, medium alone; PA, 300 µM PA; PA+LA, 300 µM PA with 10, 100, and 1,000 µM LA.

*p<0.05 for all data compared to the PA group with the Kruskal-Wallis test.

2. Effects of LA on mitochondrial morphology and DNA copy number

We compared changes in mitochondrial DNA (mDNA) copy number after exposure to PA and PA+LA by quantitative PCR. In the control group, copy number was 553±33.8, in the PA-treated cells, it was 291±14.55 (p<0.05), and in the PA+LA cells it rose again to 421±21.05 (p<0.05) (Fig. 2). TEM showed that the mitochondria of PA-treated cells were enlarged, had a reduced number of cristae, and contained an abundant granular matrix and dense intramatrix granules. The PA+LA cells contained normal-looking cristae (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The mitochondrial DNA copy number is decreased by palmitic acid (PA) treatment and restored by lipoic acid (LA). Data are presented as mean±SD (n=5 in each group). Control, medium only; PA, 300 µM PA; PA+LA, 300 µM PA and 10 µM LA.

*p<0.05 by the Kruskal-Wallis test.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Mitochondrial ultrastructure. (A) Transmission electron microscopy of normal mitochondria (controls). (B) Palmitic acid-treated mitochondria, with loss of cristae, abundant granular matrix, and dense intramatrix granules. (C) Normal ultrastructure after cotreatment with lipoic acid (black arrows, cristae; white arrows, intramatrix granules).

3. Intracellular ROS activity and mRNA expression of SCD-1

FFA treatment increased ROS compared to the control group (43,646 relative fluorescence unit [RFU] vs 41,382 RFU, p<0.05), and LA cotreatment counteracted this effect (43,646 RFU vs 41,935 RFU, p<0.05) (Fig. 4). SCD-1 mRNA expression increased 1.45 fold on treatment with 300 µM PA compare to control group. When LA was simultaneously treated, SCD-1 mRNA expression increased 2.44 fold compare to control group. But neither PA nor PA+LA group reached statistical significance.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are increased by palmitic acid (PA) treatment, and this increase is opposed by lipoic acid (LA). Intracellular ROS levels were measured at 12 hours. Data are presented as mean±SD (n=5 in each group). Control, medium only; PA, 300 µM PA; PA+LA, 300 µM PA and 10 µM LA.

*p<0.05 in the Kruskal-Wallis test.

4. Lipid partitioning: gas chromatography

Total percent SFA was 53.0% in the HepG2 cell membrane, this increased to 61.2% with PA pretreatment, and fell with LA cotreatment (61.2% vs 51.7%, p<0.05) (Fig. 5A). Both the mono-unsaturated FA (MUFA) and poly-unsaturated FA (PUFA) fractions were increased by LA treatment (Fig. 5B and C), as was the percent n-3 highly unsaturated FAs (2.2% vs 1.8%, p<0.05) (Fig. 5D).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Lipid partitioning is changed by palmitic acid (PA) and lipoic acid (LA) administration. (A) The proportion of total saturated fatty acids (SFAs) is decreased by LA. (B) The proportion of mono-unsaturated FAs (MUFAs) is increased by LA. (C) The proportion of poly-unsaturated FAs (PUFAs) is increased by LA. (D) The proportion of n-3 HUFAs is increased by LA. Data are presented as mean±SD (n=5 in each group). Control, medium only; PA, 300 µM PA; PA+LA, 300 µM PA and 10 µM LA.

HUFA, highly unsaturated fatty acids.

*p<0.05 in the Kruskal-Wallis test.

5. Distribution of free cholesterol

In the control group, free cholesterol was mainly found in the cell membrane, while in the PA cells it was distributed throughout the cytoplasm as well as in the cell membrane. Cell membrane localization was largely restored in the PA+LA cells (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Distribution of free cholesterol observed by confocal microscopy. (A) In control cells, free cholesterol is found in the cell membrane. (B) In palmitic acid (PA)-treated cells, it is found in the cell membrane and in the cytoplasm. (C) In PA plus lipoic acid-treated cells, it is found mainly in the cell membrane.

DISCUSSION

Our data showed that LA prevents FFA-induced hepatic lipotoxicity not only by scavenging ROS but also by changing intracellular lipid composition. LA is a powerful antioxidant, which increases the supply of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, and acts as a general scavenger of oxidized radicals. Its antioxidant effect is thought to contribute to improved outcomes in vascular endothelial disorders and peripheral neuropathy due to diabetes mellitus.22-29 Recently, Min et al.30 reported that LA reduced hepatic lipid accumulation and hepatic inflammation by lowering levels of cytochrome P450 2E1, endoplasmic reticulum stress, mitogen-activated protein kinase, and nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells. However, few studies have reported the effects of LA on NASH. In our study, we have shown that LA can prevent FFA-induced lipotoxicity by several mechanisms.

First, it is well known that mitochondria play a critical role in the development of NASH.31-33 Although the exact mechanism is still unclear, LA acts as a co-factor of mitochondrial enzyme complexes, and promotes energy conversion via energy metabolism.20,34 Valdecantos et al.35 reported that LA increased the number and activity of mitochondria by increasing sirtuin levels. We found that LA prevented the decrease of mitochondrial copy number and morphological changes induced by FFAs. This means that LA has mitochondrial protective effects in this lipotoxicity model. However we did not examine functional aspects of mitochondria including respiratory chain enzyme activities and beta oxidation activity. Additional comprehensive tests for mitochondrial function are required. Second, we showed that LA decreased SFA levels in the cell membrane, and increased levels of MUFAs, which may reduce oxidative stress and cell damage. A study by Celik et al.36 reported that administration of LA increased the UFA:SFA ratio in brain tissue, thus decreasing oxidative stress. LA also increased the UFA:SFA ratio in the erythrocytes of diabetic rats.37 However, few studies to date have investigated the direct impact of LA on SCD-1 activity. SCD-1 plays an important role in maintaining the balance between SFA and UFA in the cell.38 We have examined SCD-1 mRNA expression by RT-PCR. Unfortunately there were no significant changes of SCD-1 mRNA expression in the LA group. Some other mechanism may therefore be responsible for the changes of intracellular FA composition. Finally, in addition to the UFA:SFA ratio, the distribution of free cholesterol is an important factor in apoptosis. Recent studies have shown that an increase of free cholesterol in mitochondria is toxic for neural and liver cells.15,38 In our study we found that administration of LA led to a redistribution of FFAs from the cytosol to the cellular membrane.

In conclusion, LA inhibits PA-mediated lipotoxicity via mechanisms involving changes in the lipid composition of cell membranes and in the distribution of free cholesterol.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (2011-0007127).

Footnotes

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

  • 1.Cusi K. Role of obesity and lipotoxicity in the development of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: pathophysiology and clinical implications. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:711–725. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cusi K. Role of insulin resistance and lipotoxicity in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Clin Liver Dis. 2009;13:545–563. doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2009.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fujii H, Kawada N. Inflammation and fibrogenesis in steatohepatitis. J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:215–225. doi: 10.1007/s00535-012-0527-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mollica MP, Lionetti L, Putti R, Cavaliere G, Gaita M, Barletta A. From chronic overfeeding to hepatic injury: role of endoplasmic reticulum stress and inflammation. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2011;21:222–230. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2010.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Choudhury J, Sanyal AJ. Insulin resistance in NASH. Front Biosci. 2005;10:1520–1533. doi: 10.2741/1636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Haque M, Sanyal AJ. The metabolic abnormalities associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2002;16:709–731. doi: 10.1053/bega.2002.0325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Park JH. Insulin resistance in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Korean J Hepatol. 2006;12:16–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bugianesi E, McCullough AJ, Marchesini G. Insulin resistance: a metabolic pathway to chronic liver disease. Hepatology. 2005;42:987–1000. doi: 10.1002/hep.20920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Polyzos SA, Kountouras J, Zavos C. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: the pathogenetic roles of insulin resistance and adipocytokines. Curr Mol Med. 2009;9:299–314. doi: 10.2174/156652409787847191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yamaguchi K, Yang L, McCall S, et al. Inhibiting triglyceride synthesis improves hepatic steatosis but exacerbates liver damage and fibrosis in obese mice with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 2007;45:1366–1374. doi: 10.1002/hep.21655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Amaro A, Fabbrini E, Kars M, et al. Dissociation between intrahepatic triglyceride content and insulin resistance in familial hypobetalipoproteinemia. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:149–153. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.03.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Li ZZ, Berk M, McIntyre TM, Feldstein AE. Hepatic lipid partitioning and liver damage in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: role of stearoyl-CoA desaturase. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:5637–5644. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M807616200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Landry F, Chan CC, Huang Z, et al. Plasma-based approach to measure target engagement for liver-targeting stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 inhibitors. J Lipid Res. 2011;52:1494–1499. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M013177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pan ZX, Han CC, Wang JW, et al. Cloning and expression of stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 (SCD-1) in the liver of the Sichuan white goose and landes goose responding to overfeeding. Mol Biol Rep. 2011;38:3417–3425. doi: 10.1007/s11033-010-0451-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mari M, Caballero F, Colell A, et al. Mitochondrial free cholesterol loading sensitizes to TNF- and Fas-mediated steatohepatitis. Cell Metab. 2006;4:185–198. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Biewenga GP, Haenen GR, Bast A. The pharmacology of the antioxidant lipoic acid. Gen Pharmacol. 1997;29:315–331. doi: 10.1016/s0306-3623(96)00474-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Packer L, Witt EH, Tritschler HJ. Alpha-lipoic acid as a biological antioxidant. Free Radic Biol Med. 1995;19:227–250. doi: 10.1016/0891-5849(95)00017-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mattulat A, Baltes W. Determination of lipoic acid in meat of commercial quality. Z Lebensm Unters Forsch. 1992;194:326–329. doi: 10.1007/BF01193214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kataoka H, Hirabayashi N, Makita M. Analysis of lipoic acid by gas chromatography with flame photometric detection. Methods Enzymol. 1997;279:166–176. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(97)79020-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Salinthone S, Yadav V, Bourdette DN, Carr DW. Lipoic acid: a novel therapeutic approach for multiple sclerosis and other chronic inflammatory diseases of the CNS. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2008;8:132–142. doi: 10.2174/187153008784534303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Simbula G, Columbano A, Ledda-Columbano GM, et al. Increased ROS generation and p53 activation in alpha-lipoic acid-induced apoptosis of hepatoma cells. Apoptosis. 2007;12:113–123. doi: 10.1007/s10495-006-0487-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mijnhout GS, Kollen BJ, Alkhalaf A, Kleefstra N, Bilo HJ. Alpha lipoic acid for symptomatic peripheral neuropathy in patients with diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Endocrinol. 2012;2012:456279. doi: 10.1155/2012/456279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Papanas N, Maltezos E. alpha-Lipoic acid, diabetic neuropathy, and Nathan's prophecy. Angiology. 2012;63:81–83. doi: 10.1177/0003319711421165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.McIlduff CE, Rutkove SB. Critical appraisal of the use of alpha lipoic acid (thioctic acid) in the treatment of symptomatic diabetic polyneuropathy. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2011;7:377–385. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S11325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gu XM, Zhang SS, Wu JC, et al. Efficacy and safety of high-dose alpha-lipoic acid in the treatment of diabetic polyneuropathy. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2010;90:2473–2476. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mijnhout GS, Alkhalaf A, Kleefstra N, Bilo HJ. Alpha lipoic acid: a new treatment for neuropathic pain in patients with diabetes? Neth J Med. 2010;68:158–162. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Xiang G, Pu J, Yue L, Hou J, Sun H. alpha-lipoic acid can improve endothelial dysfunction in subjects with impaired fasting glucose. Metabolism. 2011;60:480–485. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2010.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Heinisch BB, Francesconi M, Mittermayer F, et al. Alpha-lipoic acid improves vascular endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes: a placebo-controlled randomized trial. Eur J Clin Invest. 2010;40:148–154. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2009.02236.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tardif JC, Rhéaume E. Lipoic acid supplementation and endothelial function. Br J Pharmacol. 2008;153:1587–1588. doi: 10.1038/bjp.2008.74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Min AK, Kim MK, Kim HS, et al. Alpha-lipoic acid attenuates methionine choline deficient diet-induced steatohepatitis in C57BL/6 mice. Life Sci. 2012;90:200–205. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2011.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Serviddio G, Bellanti F, Vendemiale G, Altomare E. Mitochondrial dysfunction in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;5:233–244. doi: 10.1586/egh.11.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jun DW, Cho WK, Jun JH, et al. Prevention of free fatty acid-induced hepatic lipotoxicity by carnitine via reversal of mitochondrial dysfunction. Liver Int. 2011;31:1315–1324. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2011.02602.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lim CY, Jun DW, Jang SS, Cho WK, Chae JD, Jun JH. Effects of carnitine on peripheral blood mitochondrial DNA copy number and liver function in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2010;55:384–389. doi: 10.4166/kjg.2010.55.6.384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Maczurek A, Hager K, Kenklies M, et al. Lipoic acid as an anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective treatment for Alzheimer disease. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60:1463–1470. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2008.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Valdecantos MP, Pérez-Matute P, González-Muniesa P, Prieto-Hontoria PL, Moreno-Aliaga MJ, Martínez JA. Lipoic acid improves mitochondrial function in nonalcoholic steatosis through the stimulation of sirtuin 1 and sirtuin 3. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2012;20:1974–1983. doi: 10.1038/oby.2012.32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Celik S, Ozkaya A. Effects of intraperitoneally administered lipoic acid, vitamin E, and linalool on the level of total lipid and fatty acids in guinea pig brain with oxidative stress induced by H2O2. J Biochem Mol Biol. 2002;35:547–552. doi: 10.5483/bmbrep.2002.35.6.547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Yilmaz O, Ozkan Y, Yildirim M, Oztrk AI, Ern Y. Effects of alpha lipoic acid, ascorbic acid-6-palmitate, and fish oil on the glutathione, malonaldehyde, and fatty acids levels in erythrocytes of streptozotocin induced diabetic male rats. J Cell Biochem. 2002;86:530–539. doi: 10.1002/jcb.10244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Fernández A, Llacuna L, Fernández-Checa JC, Colell A. Mitochondrial cholesterol loading exacerbates amyloid beta peptide-induced inflammation and neurotoxicity. J Neurosci. 2009;29:6394–6405. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4909-08.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Gut and Liver are provided here courtesy of The Korean Society of Gastroenterology, the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases, the Korean Association for the Study of the Liver, the Korean Society of Pancreatobiliary Disease, and the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer

RESOURCES