Abstract
Background
The impact of premature frailty in HIV-infected individuals on the prevalence of sexual behaviors and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) is unknown.
Methods
We compared these factors among individuals aged ≥18 years, who had prior determination of a frailty phenotype at the Washington University HIV Clinic between June and December 2008. All P values were 2-tailed and considered significant at <.05.
Results
Of 445 individuals (71% male, 30% Caucasian, median age 43 years)assessed, the prevalence of frailty was 9%. Reports of recent sexual activity (44%) did not differ by frailty status. Consistent condom use (69% overall) was similar between sexually active frail and nonfrail individuals, and there was no significant difference in STI prevalence between groups (0 vs 32 [9%], P ¼ .08).
Conclusion
In this relatively young population, frailty did not affect reports of recent sexual activity or consistent condom use and no significant difference in STI prevalence was observed.
Keywords: HIV, frailty, sexual behaviors, sexually transmitted infections
Background
The manifestation of frailty among HIV-infected individuals is increasingly recognized.1–3 Frailty, a geriatric syndrome, which is characterized by weight loss, exhaustion, low physical activity, weakness, and slowing4 is associated with markers of advanced immunodeficiency, increased comorbidity, and depression among HIV-infected individuals and has been associated with a number of adverse socioeconomic and clinical outcomes.1–3 Frail HIV-infected individuals have a worse prognosis after initiation of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART),5 increased rates of hospitalization, and longer duration of inpatient stay than nonfrail counterparts.3 Persistent higher risk sexual behaviors have been reported in HIV-infected individuals in general6,7 regardless of age,8–11 and higher risk sexual behaviors are more likely to occur in those with less advanced immunodeficiency.12–14 The impact of frailty on the sexual behaviors and acquisition of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among frail individuals is unknown. Although frailty may lead to lower rates of sexual activity, it may also conversely result in risky sex practices due to lack of power to negotiate safer sex.8,15,16 We hypothesize that frail HIV-infected individuals are less sexually active but have higher risk behaviors than nonfrail individuals and a higher prevalence of STIs. This study aimed to evaluate differences in sexual behaviors and prevalence of STIs between frail and nonfrail HIV-infected individuals in our clinic population.
Methods
Collected Data
This was a cross-sectional study of individuals aged ≥18 years, who presented for HIV-related medical care at the Washington University HIV Clinic, St. Louis, between June 2008 and December 2008 and completed an annual behavioral assessment, administered by trained interviewers, as previously reported.3 The annual behavioral assessment took approximately 10 to 15 minutes and included sociodemographic factors (race/ethnicity, employment status, annual income), a frailty assessment, a revised version of the risk behavior assessment,17 which was used to measure units of alcohol consumed during a typical week, illicit drug use within the last week/30 days/12 months/ever, sexual behaviors (current sexual relationship, recent sexual activity, condom use, type of sexual encounter, number of sexual partners), and details on disclosure of HIV status (sex partner, family, friends, others). Results of STI testing, within 1 year of the behavioral assessment, were collected from medical records. A complete STI screen included results of urine DNA amplification for Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis and rapid plasma reagin (RPR) in the past year. Treponema pallidum antibody testing was performed for confirmation of newly reactive RPRs.
Definitions
If an individual had been previously treated for syphilis, a 4-fold increase in rapid plasma reagin (RPR) defined reexposure. Frailty (herein be referred to as frailty) was defined by the presence of ≥3 of 5 criteria: (1) unintentional weight loss, (2) self-reported low physical activity, (3) self-reported exhaustion, (4) weak grip strength, and (5) slow walking time.3,4 This study was approved by the Washington University School of Medicine Human Research Protection Office.
Statistical Analysis
Comparisons between categorical groups were performed using w2 tests. All P values were 2-sided and considered significant at <.05. All analyses were performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16.0.
Results
Results were available for 445 (81%) of 547 individuals who completed the annual assessment and had criteria available for determination of the frailty phenotype (all 5 criteria present or at least 3 negative or positive criteria, if missing variables). As previously reported, in total, 71% were male, 63% were African American, and 75% were taking HAART, with full viral suppression in 230 (69%) of those individuals. Thirty-nine (9%) individuals were considered frail. The median age was 43 years (48 years in frail and 43 years in nonfrail individuals).3
Table 1 details sexual behavior and STI test results by frailty status. Disclosure of HIV status did not differ with frailty status overall, but frail individuals were more likely to disclose their HIV-positive status to family than nonfrail individuals (90% vs 72%, respectively, P ¼ .02). Comparable proportions of frail and nonfrail individuals were in a current sexual relationship (45% overall), and the majority had only 1 sexual partner (95% overall).
Table I.
Characteristics | All (n = 445) | Frail (n = 39) | Nonfrail (n =406) | P |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age (years)a | 43 (33–49) | 48 (41–51) | 43 (32–49) | .03 |
Disclosure to someone | 417 (93.7%) | 39 (100%) | 378 (93.1%) | .09 |
Spouse/sex partner | 58.9% | 51.3% | 59.6% | .31 |
Family member | 73.9% | 89.7% | 72.4% | .02 |
Friends | 59.3% | 61.5% | 59.1% | .77 |
Current sexual relationship | 201(45.2%) | 18 (46.2%) | 183 (45.1%) | .92 |
One partner (%) | 94.5% | 97.4% | 94.5% | .97 |
Multiple partners (%) | 5.5% | 2.6% | 5.5% | - |
Any recent sexual activity | 196 (44.0%) | 13 (33.3%) | 183 (45.2%) | .15 |
Type of encounters b | .61 | |||
Heterosexual | 91 (51.1%) | 7 (58.3%) | 84 (50.6%) | - |
MSM | 82 (46.1%) | 5 (41.7%) | 77 (46.4%) | - |
Bisexual | 5 (2.8%) | 0 | 5(3.0%) | - |
Number of sex partners a | .53 | |||
Heterosexual | 1(1–10) | 1 (1–3) | 1(1–10) | - |
MSM | 1 (l–11) | 1 (1–6) | 1 (1–11) | - |
Bisexual | 2 (2–5) | 0 | 2 (2–5) | - |
Condom used last anal or vaginal sex c | 163 (83.6%) | 1 1 (84.6%) | 152(83.6%) | .92 |
Consistent condom use d | 129 (69.4%) | 9 (69.2%) | 120 (69.3%) | .99 |
Complete STI screen | 371(83.4%) | 31 (79.5%) | 340 (83.7%) | .50 |
Positive result e | 32 (8.2%) | 0 | 32 (8.9%) | .08 |
Abbreviations: MSM = men who have sex with men; STI = sexually transmitted infections.
Median (range).
n = 178 answered.
n= 195.
n = 186 answered.
n = 389 results available.
Reports of recent sexual activity, although reduced for frail individuals (33% frail vs 45% nonfrail), were also similar. Among those reporting recent sexual activity (33% frail individuals and 45% nonfrail individuals), frail and nonfrail individuals had comparable types of sexual encounters (51% heterosexual and 49% men who have sex with men (MSM)/bisexual overall). Safer sex practices did not differ by frailty status. Both groups had a comparable rate for STI screening. Overall, 33 new STIs were diagnosed in 32 (7%) individuals during the study period. Syphilis was the most common STI (n = 17), followed by chlamydia (n = 9) and gonorrhea (n = 8). All STIs occurred in nonfrail individuals; however, the difference was not statistically significant (P = .08).
Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the first study to describe sexual behaviors and prevalence of STIs in frail HIV-infected individuals. We found comparable reports of recent sexual activity, types of sexual encounters, and numbers of sexual partners regardless of frailty status. Furthermore, inconsistent condom use was similar between both groups. These findings contradict our hypothesis that frail individuals would have lower rates of sexual activity but higher rates of risk behaviors and prevalence of STIs than nonfrail individuals because of more advanced HIV disease, greater comorbidity, more depression, and poorer socioeconomic and clinical outcomes.1–3 Although sexual dysfunction is often an early manifestation of physical illness9,18–21 and can also be negatively affected by mental illness,20,22 we found similar reports of recent sexual activity regardless of frailty status. Any impact of frailty on sexual activity, therefore, may be negated in these individuals by their relatively young age. Similarly, although mental illness has been associated with a number of higher risk sexual behaviors,21 and lower socioeconomic status has been reported as a risk factor for ineffective negotiation of condom use and risk taking to maintain a relationship,23–26 we did not find a negative impact of frailty on safer sex practices or STI prevalence. These results underline the complex interplay of a number of clinical, behavioral, and socioeconomic factors on these behaviors. The absence of any STIs among the frail individuals likely reflects their overall small number in this study and the relatively low prevalence of this syndrome in the HIV-infected population. Another explanation would be a lower frequency of sexual encounters. However, we did not collect data on frequency of sexual intercourse, as such data are often limited by recall bias.27,28 Further limitations of our study include time constraints and missing data, which restricted our determination of the impact of sexual desire, reasons for higher risk sexual behaviors, and use of erectile motility agents. In summary, the premature occurrence of frailty in HIV-infected individuals does not affect reports of recent sexual activity or higher risk sexual behaviors. Care providers should counsel all patients on secondary prevention measures, regardless of the presence of frailty. Further studies are warranted.
Acknowledgments
Funding
This publication was partially supported by Grant Number UL1RR024992 (PI: Dr. Kenneth Polonsky) from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), and KL2RR024994 to Dr. Shacham. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NCRR or NIH. Dr. Overton receives grants and research support from Abbott, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Tibotec, Gilead and Bavarian Nordic. He also serves as a consultant for Abbott, GlaxoSmithKline, Tibotec, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Gilead.
Footnotes
Declaration of Conflicting Interest
The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.
References
- 1.Desquiblet L, Jacobson LP, Fried LP, et al. for the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study. HIV-1 infection is associated with an earlier occurrence of a phenotype related to frailty. J Gerontol. 2007;62(11):1279–1286. doi: 10.1093/gerona/62.11.1279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Desquilbet L, Margolick JB, Fried LP, et al. for the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study. Relationship between a frailty-related phenotype and progressive deterioration of the immune system in HIV-infected men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009;50(3):299–306. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181945eb0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Önen NF, Agbebi A, Shacham E, et al. Frailty among HIV-infected persons in an urban outpatient care setting. J Infect. 2009 doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2009.08.008. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fried L, Tangen CM, Waltson J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(3):M146–M156. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Desquiblet L, Margolick JB, Fried LP, et al. Frailty and time from HAART initiation to AIDS or death; XVI International AIDS Conference; 2006. Abstract MOPE0338. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gorbach PM, Drumright LN, Daar ES, Little SJ. Transmission behaviors of recently HIV-infected men who have sex with men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;42(1):80–85. doi: 10.1097/01.qai.0000196665.78497.f1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Weinhardt LS, Carey MP. Human immunodeficiency virus testing and behavior change. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(17):1994–2000. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.10.1538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Illa L, Brickman A, Saint-Jean G, et al. Sexual risk behaviors in late middle age and older HIV seropositive adults. AIDS Behav. 2008;12(6):935–942. doi: 10.1007/s10461-008-9370-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Onen NF, Shacham E, Stamm KE, Overton ET. Comparisons of sexual behaviors and new STD diagnoses among older and younger individuals with HIV infection. AIDS Care. doi: 10.1080/09540120903373573. In press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cooperman NA, Arnsten JH, Klein RS. Current sexual activity and risky sexual behavior in older men with or at risk for HIV infection. AIDS Educ Prev. 2007;19(4):321–333. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2007.19.4.321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lovejoy TI, Heckman TG, Sikkema KJ, et al. Patterns and correlates of sexual activity and condom use in behavior in persons 50-plus years of age living with HIV/AIDS. AIDS Behav. 2008;12(6):943–956. doi: 10.1007/s10461-008-9384-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dolezal C, Meyer-Bahlburg HF, Liu X, et al. Longitudinal changes in sexual risk behavior among HIV+ and HIV− male injecting drug users. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1999;25(2):281–303. doi: 10.1081/ada-100101861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tun W, Gange SJ, Vlahov D, Strathdee SA, Celentano DD. Increase in sexual risk behavior associated with immunologic response to highly active antiretroviral therapy among HIV-infected injection drug users. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38(8):1167–1174. doi: 10.1086/383033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Shacham E, Basta TB, Reece M. Relationship of psychological distress and unprotected sex among individuals with HIV seeking mental health care. J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care. 2009;8(2):93–99. doi: 10.1177/1545109709332468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pulerwitz J, Amaro H, De Jong W, Gortmaker SL, Rudd R. Relationship, power, condom use and HIV risk among women in the USA. AIDS Care. 2002;14(6):789–800. doi: 10.1080/0954012021000031868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gomez CA, Van Oss Marin B. Gender, culture and power: barriers to HIV-prevention strategies for women. J Sex Res. 1996;33(4):355–362. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Needles RF, Dennis G, Weahterby N, et al. Reliability of self-reported HIV risk behaviors of drug users. Psychol Addict Behav. 2005;9(4):242–250. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Clayton A, Ramamurthy S. The impact of physical illness on sexual dysfunction. Adv Psychosom Med. 2008;29:70–88. doi: 10.1159/000126625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Neundorfer M, Braudy Harris P, Britton PJ, Lynch DA. HIV-risk factors for midlife and older women. Gerontologist. 2005;45(5):617–625. doi: 10.1093/geront/45.5.617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gregorian RS, Golden KA, Bahce A, et al. Antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction. Ann Pharmacother. 2002;36(10):1577–1589. doi: 10.1345/aph.1A195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mota NP, Cox BJ, Katz LY, et al. Relationship between mental disorders/suicidality and three sexual behaviors: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Sex Behav. 2009 doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9463-5. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zemishlany Z, Weizman A. The impact of mental illness on sexual dysfunction. Adv Psychosom Med. 2008;29:89–106. doi: 10.1159/000126626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Raiford JL, Diclemente RJ, Wingood GM. Effects of fear of abuse and possible STI acquisition on the sexual behavior of young African American women. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(6):1067–1071. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.131482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Pérez-Jiménez D, Seal DW, Serrano-García I. Barriers and facilitators of HIV prevention with heterosexual Latino couples: beliefs of four stakeholder groups. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2009;15(1):11–17. doi: 10.1037/a0013872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tross S, Campbell AN, Cohen LR, et al. Effectiveness of HIV/STD sexual risk reduction groups for women in substance abuse treatment programs: results of NIDA Clinical Trials Network Trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008;48(5):581–589. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31817efb6e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Holmes L, Jr, Ogungbade GO, Ward DD, et al. Potential markers of female condom use among inner city African-American women. AIDS Care. 2008;20(4):470–477. doi: 10.1080/09540120701867016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Durant LE, Carey MP. Reliability of retrospective self-reports of sexual and nonsexual health behaviors among women. J Sex Marital Ther. 2002;28(4):331–338. doi: 10.1080/00926230290001457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shacham E, Cottler LB. Sexual behaviors: rates and reliability. Arch Sex Behav. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9539-x. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]