Abstract
Objective
To establish a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique based on cytochrome b (cytb) gene of mitochondria DNA (mtDNA) for blood meal identification.
Methods
The PCR technique was established based on published information and validated using blood sample of laboratory animals of which their whole gene sequences are available in GenBank. PCR was next performed to compile gene sequences of different species of wild rodents. The primers used were complementary to the conserved region of the cytb gene of vertebrate's mtDNA. A total of 100 blood samples, both from laboratory animals and wild rodents were collected and analyzed. The obtained unknown sequences were compared with those in the GenBank database using BLAST program to identify the vertebrate animal species.
Results
Gene sequences of 11 species of wild animals caught in 9 localities of Peninsular Malaysia were compiled using the established PCR. The animals involved were Rattus (rattus) tanezumi, Rattus tiomanicus, Leopoldamys sabanus, Tupaia glis, Tupaia minor, Niviventor cremoriventor, Rhinosciurus laticaudatus, Callosciurus caniseps, Sundamys muelleri, Rattus rajah and Maxomys whiteheadi. The BLAST results confirmed the host with exact or nearly exact matches (>89% identity). Ten new gene sequences have been deposited in GenBank database since September 2010.
Conclusions
This study indicates that the PCR direct sequencing system using universal primer sets for vertebrate cytb gene is a promising technique for blood meal identification.
Keywords: Molecular tool, Blood meal identification, Polymerase chain reaction, Cytochrome b, Blood meal, Mitochondria DNA, Gene sequence, Vertebrate, Primer, GenBank database
1. Introduction
Vector borne diseases such as scrub typhus, yellow fever, malaria, dengue, chikungunya, and Lyme disease have tremendous health impact on the human population worldwide[1]. Efforts to identify reservoir hosts for vector borne zoonotic pathogens have been a labor-intensive exercise due to several requirements such as capture of potential wildlife hosts and experimental infections with pathogens of interest. It is a challenge to conduct subsequent examination of the host's efficiency to transmit infectious agent to the vector organisms under controlled condition[2]. Moreover, such laboratory-based estimates may fail to capture the true distribution of host competencies because of unknown consequences of host selection behavior by vector organisms or the unmeasured contributions of cryptic reservoir hosts[3],[4].
Serological techniques like precipitin test, latex agglutination and ELISA have been developed long time ago to identify the source of vertebrate blood. These techniques however, did not solve some phylogenetic identification problems for closely related species[5]. This may result in a high percentage of samples being identified only to the family level but not to the exact species[6],[7]. Moreover, the contemporary techniques are also time consuming and lack sensitivity[8],[9].
Recent developments in molecular biology have allowed a significance improvement in the efficacy and reliability of blood meal identification[10]. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based techniques have been proven to be highly effective and versatile in laboratory trials and are likely to replace all other approaches. Molecular based assays have been developed to detect and identify blood meal sources of some insect vectors but most studies were focused on human blood[11]. Only few studies concerning host preference patterns were conducted for identification of vertebrate species[3],[12]. These studies were based on the analysis of mitochondrial cytochrome b (cytb) gene which has been widely used[13]–[17].
Majority of the vector-borne diseases survived in nature by utilizing animals as their vertebrate hosts[18]. To make it worse, environmental changes and deforestations may contribute to the increase of contacts between man and wild animals[19]. It is therefore critical to identify natural hosts of the causative pathogens as fast and accurate possible for an effective outbreak management and control. Thus the aim of this study is to establish a PCR technique for blood meal identification based on the cytb gene of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequences of some vertebrate animals in Malaysia.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Animal origin and blood collection
Blood from the following laboratory animals (rabbits, Sprague-Dawley rat and BALB/c mice) which reared in the Laboratory Animal Resource Unit, Institute for Medical Research (IMR) were collected for establishment and validation of PCR technique. Fieldworks in 9 locations of Peninsular Malaysia were organized for trapping of wild rodents, shrews and other small animals. The locations studied were Slim River, Perak; Raub, Pahang; Bukit Panchor, Penang; Gunung Inas, Ulu Sedim, Kedah; Janda Baik, Pahang; Seremban, Negeri Sembilan; Hulu Langat, Selangor; Sungai Sedim, Kedah and Setiu, Terengganu. Host was first anaesthetized with zoletil 50 (Virbac Laboratories, France) and 3 mL blood was collected using appropriate humane procedure in EDTA tubes and stored at -20 °C until further use. The project was approved by the Animal Use Committee of the Ministry of Health Malaysia (Ref No: ACUC/KKM/02(6)2009).
2.2. Blood dilution
Freeze-thawed blood was diluted 1:10 in sterile double distilled water and used as a template in PCR.
2.3. PCR amplification and gel electrophoresis
DNA of hosts was amplified using PCR with universal primers complementary to the conserved region of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) cytb gene. The primers, L14841 (F5′-CCATCCAACATCTCAGCATGATGAAA-3′) and H15149 (R5′-CCCCTCAGAATGATATTTGTCCTCA-3′) amplified 359 bp of the cytb gene[6],[20]. The PCR was performed using KAPA Blood PCR Kit (Kapa Biosystems Inc. USA) according to the manufacturer's manual. A mixture of 25 µL solution containing 2× Kappa Blood PCR mix, 0.5 µM of each primer and 2.5 µL of blood DNA template was prepared and amplified using an Eppendorf Master Cycler Personal machine with conditions of pre-heating at 95 °C for 10 min, 35 cycles of consecutive incubations at 94 °C for 30 sec, 52 °C for 30 sec and 72 °C for 5 min. A negative control was included for each batch of assay. Amplified DNA products were confirmed with 1.2% agarose gel in 0.5× electrophoresis buffer and visualized under ultraviolet (UV) light after staining with 2 mg/mL ethidium bromide. A 100 bp DNA ladder (Bioron, Germany) was used as the standard marker for comparison.
2.4. DNA sequencing
PCR products from gel were excised with a sterile gel cutter and purified using 5 Prime PCR Agarose Gel Extract Mini Kit (Hamburg, Germany) according to the manufacturer's procedure. DNA sequencing in both directions was done in the presence of the ABI PRISM ready reaction big dye terminator cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Forster City, California, USA), following the manufacturer's manual.
2.5. BLAST search
To identify vertebrate host species, the obtained unknown sequences were compared with those already deposited in the GenBank database using the BLAST program in Basic Local Alignment Search Tool searches[21]. Sequences of a given pair-wise alignment with the lowest E-value were selected as the most likely species of host.
2.6. Sensitivity of PCR
Ten serial dilutions (1.0, 0.9, 0.8, 0.7, 0.6, 0.5, 0.4, 0.3, 0.2, 0.1 µL) of blood DNA were used to detect threshold for determination of sensitivity for the PCR amplification of the cytb gene. The PCR followed the procedure as described for the hosts DNA amplification and confirmed by analyzing 6 µL of PCR products on 1.2% agarose gel.
3. Results
A total of one hundred blood samples collected from laboratory and small wild animals were amplified using PCR. Of those, 88 blood samples were from eleven species of wild animals including Rattus tiomanicus (R. tiomanicus) (19), Rattus tanezumi (R. tanezumi) (25), Rattus rajah (R. rajah) (4), Leopoldamys sabanus (L. sabanus) (7), Niviventor cremoriventor (N. cremoriventor) (2), Sundamys muelleri (S. muelleri) (8), Tupaia glis (T. glis) (16), Rhinosciurus laticaudatus (R. laticaudatus) (2), Callosciurus spp. (1), Maxomys whiteheadi (M. whiteheadi) (3), Trpaia minor (T. minor) (1). The amplification of a single fragment encoding a 359 bp sequence of the cytb gene yielded the expected amplification products in most blood samples (Figure 1). Negative control (double distilled water) yielded no PCR product implying that only host's DNA patterns were detected in the amplifying specimens.
Figure 1. Gel photograph showing 359 bp of cytb-specific amplification products.
Lanes 1–3: Laboratory animal blood sample (BALB/c mice, Rabbit, SD rat); Lanes 5–9: Wild rodents blood sample (T. glis, M. whiteheadi, S. muelleri, R. tanezumi, L. sabanus); Lanes 4 and 10: Positive control DNA; Lanes M1, M2: 100 bp marker.
Identity of the blood meal recovered in this study ranged from 89%-100% similarities with those of the GenBank sequences. For laboratory animals, the similarities of gene sequences of BALB/c mice, SD rat and rabbit in this study with corresponding sequence in GenBank were 98%-99%, 99%-100% and 94%-95%, respectively. To date, only 38 of the PCR products of wild small animals were sequenced and compared against GenBank. Based on the highest similarity, 19 of the sequences matched corresponding species sequences in GenBank with 96%-100% similarity and 1 with 89% similarity. Ten new gene sequences were deposited with accession number HQ166262 (L. sabanus), HQ166263 (L. sabanus), HQ180173 (M. musculus BALB/c strain), HQ288326 (S. muelleri), HQ288327 (T. glis), HQ656820 (M. whiteheadi), HQ656821 (N. cremoriventor), JF417970 (R. tanezumi), JF417971 (R. laticaudatus) and JF417972 (R. laticaudatus) which contribute significantly in GenBank database that constantly growing[10]. A total of 19 sequences were mismatched with other species and the similarity range from 84%-99%; 9 sequences give more than 90% similarity (Table 1).
Table 1. Nine sequences of wild rodents mismatched with other species in GenBank with more than 90% similarity.
| Identified as | GenBank species | Similarity (%) |
| R. tanezumi | L. sabanus | 98 |
| M. whiteheadi | S. muelleri | 98 |
| S. muelleri | T. glis | 98 |
| L. sabanus | Maxomys spp. | 95 |
| R. rajah | M. whiteheadi | 92 |
| N. crimoriventor | M. whiteheadi | 90 |
| Lariscus insignis | M. whiteheadi | 91 |
| Calloscirus caniseps | S. muelleri | 97 |
| T. minor | Tupaia longipes | 91 |
PCR on blood DNA of both laboratory and small wild animals detected a 359 bp of PCR product using from as low as 0.3 µL blood sample (Figure 2). Faded amplification signals were shown in lanes with lower volume of blood samples. The above-mentioned sensitivity tests were carried out more than two times for each species of host to guarantee the reaction reproducibility.
Figure 2. Gel photograph showing 359 bp of cytb gene by PCR amplification of 10 serial dilutions tested where each well contains different volume of blood (0.1–1.0 µL).
M1: molecular weight marker (100-bp DNA ladder).
4. Discussion
A PCR technique for blood meal identification of laboratory and wild small animals based on mitochondrial cytochrome b (cytb) gene was successfully established in IMR. This is fruitful as PCR has been widely used in the analysis of mitochondrial DNA cytb gene for blood meal identification of mammalian and avian host[6],[22],[23]. In this study, a short fragment of the gene (359 bp) was investigated for blood meal identification due to its widest taxonomic representation in nucleotide databases. The fragment fulfilled the requirement of relatively short size and enough sequence divergence to achieve objectives of the study. It is therefore likely to find a sequence entry of an unknown sample or at least of a related species[3]. Moreover, cytb has been widely used in identifying blood meal due to their high copy numbers and sufficient genetic variation at the primary sequence level among vertebrate taxa[17],[23]. Easy support of available sequences from various species deposited in databases is another reason for the application of mtDNA in identifying bloodmeal[24],[25]. Currently, there are more than 8 000 cytb gene sequences of vertebrate animals available in the GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ and this data set is constantly growing[13]. For studies utilizing direct sequencing of cytb to identify bloodmeals, taxonomic coverage of cytb in GenBank is also extensive i.e. more than 120 000 entries[26].
The most significant aspect of the PCR method is its sensitivity to detect minuscule amounts of DNA. The sensitivity usually depends on both the quantity of target DNA and the progressive degradation of the host DNA. This study has shown that the established PCR technique is sensitive in detection of diminutive volume (0.3 µL) of blood meals. The volume was found lower than the range (0.5–1.0 µL) of sand fly blood meals[27]. One possible reason for the poor and decline of visualization of PCR products signal below 0.3 µL may be due to the increasing insensitivity of cytb gene amplification for detecting a small amount of vertebrate DNA in a progressive dilution process.
Throughout the study, only one pair of PCR primers was used to amplify a 359 bp of the cytb gene for all investigated animals. This is in agreement with studies that reported the use of universal primers as complements to conserved region of mitochondrial cytb gene in vertebrates[20],[28],[29]. These one set of universal primers, therefore appeared to be effective for almost small vertebrate animals. The primers in this study were already used for various mammalians and avian mtDNA including human[6],[7]. The feature of high copy number makes PCR amplification of mtDNA genes a robust option for analyzing vertebrate DNA in tiny arthropod bloodmeals. Furthermore, the mtDNA cytb gene has an evolutionary rate 5–10 times faster than nuclear genome[10] and therefore able to not only resolve broader taxonomic groups but also distinct subpopulations within a specific taxon[26],[30]. Amplification yielded a single band in most of the species investigated, as the PCR primers annealed in conservative regions of the cytb gene as in a study by Kocher et al[20]. The nucleotide sequence of the forward primer also gave a clearer signal to noise ratio than the reverse primer and this agreed to the same phenomenon described by Parson et al[13] when analyzing other mitochondrial sequences. Nevertheless, the nucleotide sequences of both strands were determined and the consensus sequences were analyzed and served as a basic for the identification of the biological origin of the sample[31].
While the PCR method offers clear advantages over serological identification of blood meals, a small percentage of the blood samples did not exactly match any of the DNA sequences currently available in the GenBank database. That high level of mismatch may be due to many limitations including misidentification of host species in this study, misidentification of host species listed in GenBank, and insufficient gene sequences registered with GenBank. The correct identification of an unknown sample therefore depends on the availability of the sequences in the nucleotide database. To address those limitations, there is a need to optimize training to improve identification of mammalian hosts and to examine larger numbers of local species of mammals and registered their gene sequences in GenBank. Availability of a large database of cytb gene sequences of natural hosts in Malaysia is badly needed as it will allow identification of a large variety of mammalian species. Detailed knowledge on the identity of host animals would be invaluable in the design and implementation of vector borne disease control programs.
In conclusion, this study indicates that the PCR direct sequencing system using universal primer sets for vertebrate cytb gene is a promising technique for blood meal identification. Direct sequencing of the PCR products allows comparative analysis of the unknown DNA sequences and those already deposited in the databases by using the BLAST program. It should be emphasized that present cost of PCR limits the large scale use of this method but in the case where detailed information on host species of arthropod is required, the PCR analysis has been proven to be a useful technique. However, there are certain limitations that need to be addressed to improve its accuracy. An investigation on the use of this molecular technique application was planned in the future for identification of blood meals in haematophagous arthropods especially on ticks.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the Director-General of Health, Ministry of Health, Malaysia, for permission to publish this paper. We are grateful to Mr Zuhaizam Hamid, Ms Raja Noor Azreen Raja Musa and Mrs Azima Laili Hanifah for their assistance in the field. The study was supported by a grant (JPP-IMR Code: 09-030) from the Ministry of Health, Malaysia.
Footnotes
Foundation Project: This work was financially supported by a grant (JPP-IMR Code: 09-030) from the Ministry of Health, Malaysia.
Conflict of interest statement: We declare that we have no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Gubler DJ. The global treat of emergent/reemergent vector-borne diseases in vector borne diseases: understanding the environmental, human health and ecological connection. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2008. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Allan BF, Goessling LS, Storch GA, Thach RE. Blood meal analysis to identify reservoir hosts for Amblyomma americanum ticks. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16(3):433–440. doi: 10.3201/eid1603.090911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Haouas N, Pesson B, Boudabous R, Dedet JP, Babba H, Ravel C. Development of a molecular tool for the identification of Leishmania reservoir hosts by blood meal analysis in the insect vectors. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;77(6):1054–1059. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Clausen PH, Adeyemi I, Bauer B, Breloeer M, Salchow F, Staak C. Host preferences of tsetse (Diptera Glossinidae) based on blood meal identifications. Med Vet Entomol. 1998;12:169–180. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2915.1998.00097.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Edrissian GH, Hafizi A. Application of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to identification of Anopheles mosquito bloodmeals. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1982;76(1):54–56. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(82)90017-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Boakye DA, Tang J, Truc P, Merriweather A, Unnasch TR. Identification of bloodmeals in haematophagous Diptera by cytochrome b heteroduplex analysis. Med Vet Entomol. 1999;13:282–287. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2915.1999.00193.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Steuber S, Abdel-Rady A, Clausen PH. PCR-RFLP analysis: a promising technique for host species identification of blood meals from tsetse flies (Diptera: Glossinidae) Parasitol Res. 2005;97:247–254. doi: 10.1007/s00436-005-1410-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ravasan NM, Oshaghi MA, Javadian E, Rassi Y, Sadraei J, Mohtarami F. Blood meal identification in field-captured sand flies: comparison of PCR-RFLP and ELISA assay. Iran J Arthropod Borne Dis. 2009;3(1):8–18. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sant'Anna MRV, Jones NG, Hindley JA, Mendes-Sousa AF, Dillon RJ, Cavalcante RR, et al. Blood meal identification and parasite detection in laboratory-fed and field-captured Lutzomyia longipalpis by PCR using FTA databasing paper. Acta Trop. 2008;107(3):230–237. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2008.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mukabana WR, Takken W, Knols BGJ. Analysis of arthropod bloodmeals using molecular genetic markers. Trends Parasitol. 2002b;18(11):505–509. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4922(02)02364-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pizzaro JC, Stevens L. A new method for forensic DNA analysis of the blood meal in Chagas disease vectors demonstrated using Triatoma infestans from Chuquisaca, Bolivia. PLoS One. 2008;3(10):1–8. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Oshaghi MA, Chavshin AR, Vatandoost H, Yaaghoobi F, Mohtarami F, Noorjah N. Effects of post-ingestion and physical conditions on PCR amplification of host blood meal DNA in mosquitoes. Exp Parasitol. 2006;112:232–236. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2005.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Parson W, Pegoraro K, Niederstatter H, Foger M, Steinlechner M. Species identification by means of the cytochrome b gene. Int J Legal Med. 2000;114:23–28. doi: 10.1007/s004140000134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Vun VF, Mahani MC, Lakim M, Ampeng A, Md-Zain BM. Phylogenetic relationships of leaf monkeys (Presbytis; Colobinae) based on cytochrome b and 12S rRNA genes. Genet Mol Res. 2011;10(1):368–381. doi: 10.4238/vol10-1gmr1048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bravi CM, Liron JP, Mirol PM, Ripoli MV, Peral-Garcia P, Giovambattista G. A simple method for domestic animal identification in Argentina using PCR-RFLP analysis of cytochrome b gene. Leg Med (Tokyo) 2004;6:246–251. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2004.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rebekah JK, Douglas EN. Identification of mammalian blood meals in mosquitoes by a multiplexed polymerase chain reaction targeting cytochrome b gene. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;73(2):336–342. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Castresana J. Cytochrome b phylogeny and the taxonomy of great Apes and mammals. Mol Biol Evol. 2001;18(4):465–471. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Artsob H. Vector-borne diseases. Encycl Public Health. 2011;5:1–3. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Barrow P. The population factor in wildlife diseases and their transmission to man. Optim Popul Trust Publ. 2010;2:1–2. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kocher TD, Thomas WK, Meyer A, Edwards SV, Paabo S, Villablanca FX, et al. Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:6196–6200. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.16.6196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.NCBI National center for biotechnology information. BLAST, a basic local alignment search tool. 2009. [Online] Available from: http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov [Accessed on 12 December, 2010]
- 22.Kirstein F, Gray JS. A molecular marker for the identification of the zoonotic reservoirs of Lyme borreliosis by analysis of the blood meal in its European vector Ixodes ricinus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996;62:4060–4065. doi: 10.1128/aem.62.11.4060-4065.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ngo KA, Kramer LD. Identification of mosquito blood meals using polymerase chain reaction with order specific primer. J Med Entomol. 2003;40:215–222. doi: 10.1603/0022-2585-40.2.215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Arif IA, Khan HA. Molecular markers for biodiversity analysis of wildlife animals: a brief review. Anim Biodivers Conserv. 2009;32(1):9–17. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kitano T, Umetsu K, Tian W, Osawa M. Two universal primer sets for species identification among vertebrates. Int J Legal Med. 2007;121:423–427. doi: 10.1007/s00414-006-0113-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rebekah JK. Technical review: molecular methods for arthropod blood meal identification and applications to ecological and vector-borne disease studies. Mol Ecol Resour. 2009;9:4–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2008.02469.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Daba S, Daba A, Shehata MG, El Sawaf BM. A simple micro-assay method for estimating blood meal size of the sand fly Phelebotamus langeronipter (Diptera: Psychodidae. J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 2004;34(1):173–182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Muturi CN, Ouma JO, Malele II, Ngure RM, Rutto JJ, Mithofer KM, et al. Tracking the feeding patterns of tsetse flies (Glossina genus) by analysis of bloodmeals using mitochondrial cytochrome b genes. PLoS One. 2011;6(2):1–6. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bellagamba F, Moretti VM, Comincini S, Valfre F. Identification of species in animal feedstuffs by PCR-RFLP analysis of mitochondrial DNA. J Agric Food Chem. 2001;49:3775–3781. doi: 10.1021/jf0010329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Pereira F, Carneiro J, Amorim A. Identification of species with DNA-based technology: current progress and challenges. Recent Pat DNA Gene Seq. 2008;2:187–200. doi: 10.2174/187221508786241738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hwang UW, Kim W. General properties and phylogenetic utilities of nuclear ribosomal DNA and mitochondrial DNA commonly used in molecular systematic. Korean J Parasitol. 1999;37(4):215–228. doi: 10.3347/kjp.1999.37.4.215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


