Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the antimicrobial activities of silver inorganic materials, including silver zeolite (AgZ), silver zirconium phosphate silicate (AgZrPSi) and silver zirconium phosphate (AgZrP), against oral microorganisms. In line with this objective, the morphology and structure of each type of silver based powders were also investigated.
Methods
The antimicrobial activities of AgZ, AgZrPSi and AgZrP were tested against Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus casei, Candida albicans and Staphylococcus aureus using disk diffusion assay as a screening test. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum lethal concentration (MLC) were determined using the modified membrane method. Scanning electron microscope and X-ray diffraction were used to investigate the morphology and structure of these silver materials.
Results
All forms of silver inorganic materials could inhibit the growth of all test microorganisms. The MIC of AgZ, AgZrPSi and AgZrP was 10.0 g/L whereas MLC ranged between 10.0–60.0 g/L. In terms of morphology and structure, AgZrPSi and AgZrP had smaller sized particles (1.5–3.0 µm) and more uniformly shaped than AgZ.
Conclusions
Silver inorganic materials in the form of AgZ, AgZrPSi and AgZrP had antimicrobial effects against all test oral microorganisms and those activities may be influenced by the crystal structure of carriers. These results suggest that these silver materials may be useful metals applied to oral hygiene products to provide antimicrobial activity against oral infection.
Keywords: Silver zeolite, Silver zirconium phosphate silicate, Silver zirconium phosphate, Oral microorganisms
1. Introduction
The bioactivity of noble metals and their uses are research areas of growing interest due to their high reactivity, high compatibility and non-toxicity on eukaryotic cells. Among various kinds of noble metals, silver seems popular to use in biomedical field due to its attractive physiochemical properties and lower cost price.
Silver has long been extensively used in medical fields to prevent and treat a variety of diseases, most notably infections. It has been described as being “oligodynamic” as a result of its ability to exhibit bactericidal activity at minute concentrations[1],[2]. Consequently, a large number of oral healthcare products nowadays contain silver, principally due to its broad-spectrum antimicrobial effects and low toxicity to humans.
Several kinds of inorganic materials containing silver including antimicrobial agents using different inorganic carriers such as zeolite, phosphate, titanium dioxide, activated carbon, montmorillonite, water-soluble glass and mesoporous silica, were developed to extend lifetime of silver. The prolonged constant dissociation of silver ions into the surrounding environment provides a higher clinical efficacy of these silver containing materials. In addition, inorganic materials containing silver do not disturb the color of the products[3],[4].
The antimicrobial activities of silver depend on the silver cation Ag+, which binds strongly to electron donor groups in biological molecules containing sulphur, oxygen or nitrogen. These silver-based materials have to release Ag+ to a pathogenic environment to be effective.
In dentistry, dental caries and candidiasis are common infections found in the oral cavity and create health problems for people in many countries. These conditions are caused by bacteria and yeast residing in the oral cavity. Dental caries is the destruction of hard tissue of teeth due to acids produced by bacteria. Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans)and Lactobacillus spp. have been shown to have cariogenic potential owing to their acidogenic and aciduric abilities[5]. S. mutans appears to be important in the initiation of dental caries since its activities lead to colonization of the tooth surface, dental plaque formation and demineralization. Lactobacilli, mainly found in carious lesions, have been suspected to be secondary invaders that contribute to the progression of lesions. Apart from dental caries, oral candidiasis is a common opportunistic infection of the oral cavity caused by Candida spp. In the debilitated, compromised host, oral candidal infection may spread to the gastrointestinal tract, trachea, lungs, liver and central nervous system, capable of causing septicemia, meningitis and endocarditis[6]–[8]. The most frequent Candida spp. isolated from oral cavity is Candida. albicans (C. albicans) with the ability to adhere and colonize oral surfaces in large numbers[9]. In addition, yeast cells can co-aggregate and make synergistic relationships with pathogenic bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) leading to a mixed infection. These include angular cheilitis, osteomyelitis of the jaw, parotitis and some endodontic infections[10].
To our knowledge, no information exists regarding the comparison of antimicrobial activities of these different kinds of silver materials on the oral microorganism. The objective of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of silver inorganic materials, including silver zeolite (AgZ), silver zirconium phosphate silicate (AgZrPSi) and silver zirconium phosphate (AgZrP), against oral microorganisms. The morphology and structure of each type of silver-based powder were also investigated.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Silver based materials
AgZ, AgZrP and AgZrPSi used in the present study contained 3 000 mg/kg silver ions. All test materials were supplied by the National Direct Network Company, Thailand and made into suspension in sterile distilled water at concentrations ranging from 1.0–20.0 g/L before testing.
2.2. Materials characterization
The original silver-based materials in powder form were used in the investigation. The morphology and crystal structure of the silver-based materials were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, 15 kV, S-2500 Hitachi, Japan) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) technique (30 kV, 30 mA, Cu Kα, λ=0.15418 nm, Bruker D8 with Ni Kβ filtered), respectively.
2.3. Microorganisms
Oral microorganisms, S. mutans KPSK2, L. casei ATCC6363, C. albicans ATCC13803 and S. aureus ATCC 5638, were obtained from the culture collection of the Department of Oral Microbiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Thailand, They were maintained on brain heart infusion agar BBL, USA). Overnight cultures were prepared by inoculating approximately 2 mL Mueller Hinton broth (Difco, USA) with 2–3 colonies of each organism taken from BHI agar. Broth was incubated overnight at 37 °C for 48 h. Inocula were prepared by diluting cultures in saline solution to approximately 108 CFU/mL for bacteria and 107 CFU/mL for yeast. These suspensions were further used for antimicrobial tests.
2.4. Antimicrobial activity
2.4.1. Agar diffusion
Agar cup diffusion method was employed to obtain the susceptibility pattern of microorganisms against each silver-based material. Briefly, 20 mL of Mueller Hinton agar was poured into a 80 mm-petri dish. The medium was allowed to cool and plates were then inoculated with 108 CFU/mL of bacteria or 107 CFU/mL of yeast. By punching the agar container with a sterile cork borer and scooping out the punched part, agar cups of 5 mm diameter were made.
Each of the silver material suspensions (100 µL) at concentration of 10.0, 100.0 and 200.0 g/L was placed in each cup. Suspensions of carriers (zeolite, ZrP and ZrPSi) were used as controls. The plates were left to stay for an hour to facilitate the diffusion of the drug solution. Then the plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The antimicrobial activity was evaluated based on zones of growth inhibition (mm).
2.4.2. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum lethal concentration (MLC)
The MIC and MLC were determined using the membrane method described by Tantaoui-Elaraki et al[11]. Briefly, serial dilutions of silver material and carrier suspensions, ranging from 1.0 to 200.0 g/L were prepared in Mueller Hinton agar. Cellulose acetate membrane filters (0.45 µm porosity) (Sartorius, Germany) were placed on the surface of the agar plate and 25 µL of each microbial suspension (108 CFU/mL for bacteria and 107 CFU/mL for yeast) was dropped onto each filter. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 to 48 h. The MIC values were determined as the lowest concentration of suspension inhibiting the visible growth of each organism on the membranes.
For the determination of MLC, cellulose acetate filters without any microbial growth were transferred into brain heart infusion (BHI) broth and incubated at 37 °C for 72 h. The lowest concentration of silver materials or carriers showing no visible growth of the organisms in the tube was considered as the MLC. All the tests were performed in triplicate on three separate occasions.
3. Results
Using the agar cup diffusion method as a screening test, all of silver materials showed antimicrobial effects against all of test organisms with a zone of inhibition ranging from 7 to 21 mm (Table 1). No growth inhibition was observed when exposed to the carriers without silver (zeolite, zirconium phosphate silicate and zirconium phosphate). The MICs and MLCs of silver materials are shown in Table 2. All the test microorganisms were inhibited and killed at >10.0 g/L of silver materials except for that of AgZ against S. aureus, which exhibited the MLC value of 60.0 g/L.
Table 1. Inhibition zone of silver inorganic materials against test microorganisms.
| Concentration (g/L) | Materials | Zone of inhibition (mm) |
|||
| S. mutans | L. casei | C. albicans | S. aureus | ||
| 1.0 | AgZ | – | – | – | – |
| Ag ZrPSi | – | – | – | – | |
| AgZrP | – | – | – | – | |
| Zeolite | – | – | – | – | |
| ZrPSi | – | – | – | – | |
| 10.0 | AgZ | 10 | 7 | 7 | 11 |
| Ag ZrPSi | 17 | 9 | 9 | 8 | |
| AgZrP | 21 | 10 | 8 | 14 | |
| Zeolite | – | – | – | – | |
| ZrPSi | – | – | – | – | |
| 100.0 | AgZ | 15 | 17 | 17 | 13 |
| Ag ZrPSi | 11 | 15 | 14 | 11 | |
| AgZrP | 9 | 15 | 12 | 12 | |
| Zeolite | – | – | – | – | |
| ZrPSi | – | – | – | – | |
| 200.0 | AgZ | 14 | 16 | 18 | 14 |
| Ag ZrPSi | 11 | 15 | 15 | 12 | |
| AgZrP | 10 | 17 | 14 | 13 | |
| Zeolite | – | – | – | – | |
| ZrPSi | – | – | – | – | |
Table 2. MIC and MLC of silver inorganic materials against test ed microorganisms.
| Materials | Concentration (g/L) |
|||||||
| S. mutans | L. casei | C. albicans | S. aureus | |||||
| MIC | MLC | MIC | MLC | MIC | MLC | MIC | MLC | |
| AgZ | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 60.0 |
| Ag ZrPSi | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| AgZrP | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 |
The crystal structure of tested materials investigated Agz and Agzrpsi particles have bigger sizes compare with Agzrp particles by X-diffractometer is shown in Figure 1. The XRD patterns of AgZ showed 9 diffraction peaks which were consistent with the determined patterns of sodium aluminum silicate hydrate with cubic system. AgZrPSi presented 9 diffraction peaks; however only 7 peaks were confirmed as having the sodium zirconium phosphate silicate pattern of a rhombohedral system. The other 2 diffraction peaks were identified as impure which may be contaminated during the synthesis process. For AgZrP, 7 diffraction peaks were observed confirming the structure of rhombohedral system. From the XRD data, it indicated that the structures of these silver inorganic materials and their carriers were almost identical. Small amount of silver ions adsorbed in the carriers did not change their crystal structures and no silver peak was found in the XRD patterns.
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction spectra of silver inorganic materials. AgZ shows 9 diffraction peaks consisting of D-spacing=12.278, 8.672, 7.081, 5.488, 4.095, 3.708, 3.284, 2.983 and 2.622 Å. AgZrPSi presents 7 diffraction peaks of crystal structure (D-spacing=6.326, 4.564, 4.396, 3.802, 3.165, 2.876 and 2.543 Å); the other 2 peaks (D-spacing=3.650 and 3.341 Å) are impure. For AgZrP, 7 diffraction peaks are observed including d-spacing=6.326, 4.552, 4.396, 3.810, 3.165, 2.876 and 2.539 Å.
4. Discussion
The study demonstrated that silver inorganic materials including AgZ, AgZrPSi and AgZrP have antimicrobial effects on S. mutans, L. casei, C. albican and S. aureus. The MIC of AgZ, AgZrPSi and AgZrP was 10.0 g/L whereas MLC ranged between 10.0-60.0 g/L.
Several authors have reported that silver has a direct or indirect effect on microbial cells[12]–[15]. The antimicrobial activity exhibited by silver has resulted in the widespread use of silver particles in bedding, water purification, toothpastes, shampoos, fabrics, deodorants, filters, kitchen utensils and toys. Using silver in the form of small-sized particles shows efficient antimicrobial properties due to their extremely large surface area, producing an effective contact with microorganisms[15].
Even though the precise mechanisms of biocidal activity of silver against microorganisms is not fully understood, the proposed antimicrobial mechanisms are first that, silver ions can associate with the cell wall[16], cell membrane[17], and cell envelope of microorganisms[18],[19]. The positive charge of a silver ion is critical for antimicrobial activity, allowing electrostatic attraction between the negative charges of the bacterial cell membrane and positively charged silver particles causing cell membrane rupturing[17],[20]–[22]. Low concentrations of silver ions were demonstrated to have the ability to induce a massive proton leakage through the bacterial membrane causing subsequent cell death[23],[24].
Second, silver ions can react with nucleophilic amino acid residues in proteins, attached to sulfhydryl, amino, imidazole, phosphate and carbonyl groups of membrane or enzyme proteins. A number of oxidative enzymes have been reported to be inhibited by silver ions such as yeast attached dehydrogenase, enzymes associated with the uptake of succinate by membrane vesicles and respiratory chains of bacteria. These resulted in the metabolites efflux, interfering with DNA replication, inactivation of ATP production and inhibition of growth[16],[22],[25].
Third, the antimicrobial action of silver particles is suggested to be related to the formation of free radicals and subsequent free radical-induced membrane damage[22]. As a result of the catalytic action of silver ions, oxygen is changed into oxygen radicals by the action of light energy and/or H2O in the air or water only at polar surfaces and these oxygen radicals cause structural changes in microorganisms.
In dentistry, with the aim to reduce bacterial and fungal adhesion to oral materials and devices, silver particles have been developed and investigated for a range of possible applications, for example, incorporation into denture materials[26], dental implants[27], filling materials[28] and orthodontic adhesives[29]. However, little information is available regarding the antimicrobial effects of silver particles on oral species. Kawahara et al. evaluated the effect of AgZ on a range of obligate and facultative anaerobic oral microorganisms[30]. It was found that gram negative species (Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans) were more susceptible than gram positive species (S. mutans, Streptococcus sanguinis, S. aureus and Actinomyces viscosus). It is speculated that the reduced amount of negatively charged peptidoglycans in the cell walls of gram negative species may account for the differences in susceptibility. In contrast, silver, in the form of titanium silver alloy, is often used as material for dental implants, orthodontic brackets, wires and screws, showing no inhibitory effect against Lactobacillus acidophilus[31]. With regard to oral yeast, silver particles have demonstrated a remarkable antifungal activity toward C. albicans by attacking the plasma membrane resulting in the formation of pores, disrupting the membrane potential, inhibiting the budding process, and causing subsequent cell death[32].
Considering the antimicrobial activity and structure of the test materials, AgZrPSi and AgZrP showed higher antimicrobial ability than AgZ. It seems that crystal structure, the rhombohedral structure, not particle size, influenced the antimicrobial activity.
In conclusion, silver inorganic materials in the form of AgZ, AgZrPSi and AgZrP had antimicrobial effects against all test oral microorganisms. The MIC of AgZ, AgZrPSi and AgZrP was 10.0 g/L whereas MLC ranged between 10.0-60.0 g/L. It is possible that the activities were influenced by the crystal structures and sizes of carriers. These silver particles may be useful materials applied to oral hygiene products to provide antimicrobial activities against oral infection. However, further studies are needed to evaluate the proper concentrations for final products and clinical studies.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the Office of the Higher Education Commission, Thailand (Strategic Scholarships for Frontier Research Network for the Joint Ph.D. Program SW2551), Thailand Research Fund (TRF) and National Nanotechnology Center (NANOTEC) for their financial support.
Comments
Background
Dental caries and oral candidiasis are the most commonly seen opportunistic infections in the oral cavity. Recently there has been a surge in interest on the use of silver nano-particles (AgNPs) for its potential antimicrobial properties. It is based on incorporating AgNPs within minute voids found in crystalline structures of zeolites and inorganic carriers such as zirconium phosphate silicate and zirconium phosphate. Overtime these silver particles can get released or get dissociated into silver ions and exchanged with other cations in the environment. It has been postulated that upon release AgNPs and silver ions can come in contact with micro-organisms in the environment and cause suppression of their development. Various mechanisms have been purposed for antimicrobial action of AgNPs such as reduction in the production of vital microbial enzymes, interruption of RNA replication and alterations in cell wall permeability. This study evaluates the antimicrobial action of AgNPs on pathogenic oral micro-organisms primarily responsible for dental caries and oral candidiasis.
Research frontiers
Studies are being formed for the application of AgNPs in the field of biotechnology and bioengineering. The benefits are most sought in incorporating its antimicrobial properties in medical equipments such as surgical instruments, catheters, and wound dressings to reduce the risk of infection. Research is also being conducted to incorporate AgNPs in dental materials such as cements, liners and polymethyl methacrylate for a sustained antimicrobial action.
Related reports
This study concluded that the AgNPs had antimicrobial action against S. mutans, Lactobacillus casei, S. aureus and C. albicans at concentration of MLC concentration of 10.0–60.0 g/L. However the study could not explain the exact mechanism of action of AgNPs. Study by Xiu et al. (2012) have shown silver ions released from AgNPs had antimicrobial properties against Escherichia coli at concentrations of 120.0–310.0 g/L.
Innovations and breakthroughs
Data on the antimicrobial properties of AgNPs is limited. This study evaluates the minimum inhibitory concentration and minimum lethal concentration of silver zeolite, silver zirconium phosphate silicate and silver zirconium phosphate against oral micro-organisms. Furthermore this study also uses scanning electron microscope and X-ray diffusion to evaluate the structures of the silver particles.
Applications
It is beneficial to know the potential application of AgNPs in dentistry. The result of the study has shown that AgNPs are effective against opportunistic oral microorganisms even at low concentrations. However future studies on the sustainability of ion release from these nano-particles, changes in the physical properties of the incorporated material and the toxicity related to the oral tissues are necessary to justify its clinical use.
Peer review
This is a good preliminary study that investigates the potential antimicrobial action of AgNPs: silver zeolite, silver zirconium phosphate silicate and silver zirconium phosphate on oral microorganisms. The results showed that AgNPs were effective even at low concentrations and suggests the implication of AgNPs in dental materials to reduce the risk of opportunistic infections such as dental caries and candidiasis.
Footnotes
Foundation Project: Supported by the Office of the Higher Education Commission, Thailand (Strategic Scholarships for Frontier Research Network for the Joint Ph.D. Program SW2551).
Conflict of interest statement: We declare that we have no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Sintubin L, Verstraete W, Boon N. Biologically produced nanosilver: current state and future perspectives. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012;4 doi: 10.1002/bit.24570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Collart D, Mehrabi S, Robinson L, Kepner B, Mintz EA. Efficacy of oligodynamic metals in the control of bacterial growth in humidifier water tanks and mist droplets. J Water Health. 2006;4:149–156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sekhon BS, Kamboj SR. Inorganic nanomedicine-part 2. Nanomedicine. 2010;6:612–618. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2010.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sekhon BS, Kamboj SR. Inorganic nanomedicine-part 1. Nanomedicine. 2010;6:516–522. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2010.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Parisotto TM, King WF, Duque C, Mattos-Graner RO, Steiner-Oliveira C, Nobre-Dos-Santos M, et al. et al. Immunological and microbiologic changes during caries development in young children. Caries Res. 2011;45:377–385. doi: 10.1159/000330230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Santos M, Thiene G, Sievers HH, Basso C. Candida endocarditis complicating transapical aortic valve implantation. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:2265. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ancalle IM, Rivera JA, García I, García L, Valcárcel M. Candida albicans meningitis and brain abscesses in a neonate: a case report. Bol Asoc Med P R. 2010;102:45–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Badiee P, Alborzi A. Invasive fungal infections in renal transplant recipients. Exp Clin Transplant. 2011;9:355–362. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rautemaa R, Ramage G. Oral candidosis-clinical challenges of a biofilm disease. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2011;37:328–336. doi: 10.3109/1040841X.2011.585606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shirtliff ME, Peters BM, Jabra-Rizk MA. Cross-kingdom interactions: Candida albicans and bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009;299:1–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01668.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tantaoui-Elaraki A, Errifi A, Benjilali B, Lattaoui N. Antimicrobial activity of four chemically different essential oils. Rev Italiana. 1992;6:13–22. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Percival SL, Thomas J, Linton S, Okel T, Corum L, Slone W. The antimicrobial efficacy of silver on antibiotic-resistant bacteria isolated from burn wounds. Int Wound J. 2012;9(5):488–493. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00903.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Song J, Kang H, Lee C, Hwang SH, Jang J. Aqueous synthesis of silver nanoparticle embedded cationic polymer nanofibers and their antibacterial activity. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2011 Dec 28; doi: 10.1021/am201563t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lara HH, Garza-Treviño EN, Ixtepan-Turrent L, Singh DK. Silver nanoparticles are broad-spectrum bactericidal and virucidal compounds. J Nanobiotechnol. 2011;9:30. doi: 10.1186/1477-3155-9-30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chaloupka K, Malam Y, Seifalian AM. Nanosilver as a new generation of nanoproduct in biomedical applications. Trends Biotechnol. 2010;28:580–588. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2010.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lara HH, Ayala-Nunez NV, Ixtepan-Turrent L, Rodriguez-Padilla C. Bactericidal effect of silver nanoparticles against multidrug-resistant bacteria. Wound J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;26:615–621. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Li WR, Xie XB, Shi QS, Zeng HY, Ou-Yang YS, Chen YB. Antibacterial activity and mechanism of silver nanoparticles on Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;85:115–122. doi: 10.1007/s00253-009-2159-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lara HH, Ayala-Nunez NV, Ixtepan-Turrent L, Rodriguez-Padilla C. Mode of antiviral action of silver nanoparticles against HIV-1. J Nanotechnology. 2010;8:1. doi: 10.1186/1477-3155-8-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Galdiero S, Falanga A, Vitiello M, Cantisani M, Marra V, Galdiero M. Silver nanoparticles as potential antiviral agents. Molecules. 2011;16:8894–8918. doi: 10.3390/molecules16108894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sathishkumar M, Sneha K, Won SW, Cho CW, Kim S, Yun YS. Cinamon zeylanicum bark extract and powder mediated green synthesis of nanocrystalline silver particles and its bactericidal activity. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2009;73:332–338. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Barani H, Montazer M, Samadi N, Toliyat T. Nano silver entrapped in phospholipids membrane: synthesis, characteristics and antibacterial kinetics. Mol Membr Bio. 2011;28:206–215. doi: 10.3109/09687688.2011.565484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chen M, Yang Z, Wu H, Pan X, Xie X, Wu C. Antimicrobial activity and the mechanism of silver nanoparticle thermosensitive gel. Int J Nanomecicine. 2011;6:2873–2877. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S23945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dastjerds R, Montazer M, Shahsavan S. A new method to stabilize nanoparticles on textile surfaces. Colloids Surf A Physiochemical Enginerr Aspects. 2008;317:711–716. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dastjerds R, Mojtahedi MR, Shoshtari AM, Khosroshahi A. Investigating the production and properties of Ag/TiO2/PP antibacterial nanocomposite filament yans. J Textile Institute. 2010;101:204–213. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Li WR, Xie XB, Shi QS, Duan SS, Ouyang YS, Chen YB. Antibacterial effect of silver nanoparticles on Staphylococcus aureus. Biometals. 2011;24:135–141. doi: 10.1007/s10534-010-9381-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Monteiro DR, Gorup LF, Takamiya AS, Ruvollo-Filho AL, de Camargo ER, Barbosa DB. The growing importance of materials that prevent microbial adhesion: antimicrobial effect of medical devices containing silver. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009;34:103–110. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Almaguer-Flores A, Ximenez-Fyvie LA, Rodil SE. Oral bacterial adhesion on amorphous carbon and titanium films: effect of surface roughness and culture media. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2010;92:196–204. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Cinar C, Ulusu T, Qzcelik B, Karamuftuoglu N, Yucel H. Antibacterial effect of silver-zeolite containing root-canal filling material. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009;90:592–595. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ahn SJ, Lee SJ, Kook JK, Lim BS. Experimental antimicrobial orthodontic adhesives using nanofillers and silver nanoparticles. Dent Mater. 2009;25:206–231. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kawahara K, Tsuruda K, Morishita M, Uchida M. Antibacterial effect of silver-zeolite on oral bacteria under anaerobic conditions. Dent Mater. 2000;16:452–455. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(00)00050-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Choi JY, Kim KH, Choy KC, Oh KT, Kim KN. Photocatalytic antibacterial effect of TiO2 film formed on Ti and TiAg exposed to Lactobacillus acidophilus. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2007;80:353–359. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.30604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kim KJ, Sung WS, Suh BK, Moon SK, Choi JS, Kim JG, et al. et al. Antifungal activity and mode of action of silver nanoparticles on Candida albicans. Biometals. 2009;22:235–242. doi: 10.1007/s10534-008-9159-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

