Skip to main content
European Spine Journal logoLink to European Spine Journal
. 1998 Dec;7(6):484–492. doi: 10.1007/s005860050112

Whiplash injuries and the potential for mechanical instability

M M Panjabi 1, K Nibu 2, J Cholewicki 1
PMCID: PMC3611306  PMID: 9883958

Abstract

Whiplash injury to the cervical spine is poorly understood. Symptoms often do not correlate to the clinical findings. It has been hypothesized that the long-term clinical symptoms associated with whiplash have their basis in mechanical derangement of the cervical spine caused at the time of trauma. Before such a hypothesis can be proven, one needs to document and quantify the soft tissue injuries of the cervical spine in whiplash. The purpose of the study was to quantify the mechanical changes that occur in the cervical spine specimen as a result of experimental whiplash trauma. Utilizing a whiplash trauma model, injuries to human cadaveric cervical spine specimens (C0 – T1 or C0 – C7) were produced by increasingly severe traumas. The flexibility tests determined the motion changes at each intervertebral level in response to 1.0 Nm pure flexion-extension moment. Parameters of range of motion (ROM) and neutral zone (NZ) were determined before and after each trauma. Significant flexibility increases first occurred in the lower cervical spine after 4.5–g rear-end (anteriorly directed) acceleration of the T1 vertebra. At this acceleration magnitude, extension ROM and NZ at C5 – C6 increased (P < 0.05) by 98% and 160% respectively. There was also a tendency (P < 0.1) for the extension NZ at C0 – C1 and C6 – C7 levels to increase after the 6.5-g acceleration by 52% and 241% respectively. There were no such tendencies for the ROM parameter. We have identified the threshold and sites of whiplash injury to the cervical spine. This information should help the clinician make more precise diagnoses in the case of whiplash trauma patients.

Keywords: Key words Whiplash, Biomechanics, Spinal instability, Cervical spine, Spine injury

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (602.4 KB).

Footnotes

Received: 23 January 1998 Revised: 7 July 1998 Accepted: 3 August 1998


Articles from European Spine Journal are provided here courtesy of Springer-Verlag

RESOURCES