Abstract
The relationship between the compositions of the Earth and chondritic meteorites is at the center of many important debates. A basic assumption in most models for the Earth’s composition is that the refractory elements are present in chondritic proportions relative to each other. This assumption is now challenged by recent 142Nd/144Nd ratio studies suggesting that the bulk silicate Earth (BSE) might have an Sm/Nd ratio 6% higher than chondrites (i.e., the BSE is superchondritic). This has led to the proposal that the present-day 143Nd/144Nd ratio of BSE is similar to that of some deep mantle plumes rather than chondrites. Our reexamination of the long-lived 147Sm-143Nd isotope systematics of the depleted mantle and the continental crust shows that the BSE, reconstructed using the depleted mantle and continental crust, has 143Nd/144Nd and Sm/Nd ratios close to chondritic values. The small difference in the ratio of 142Nd/144Nd between ordinary chondrites and the Earth must be due to a process different from mantle-crust differentiation, such as incomplete mixing of distinct nucleosynthetic components in the solar nebula.
Keywords: chondrite composition, Earth composition, midocean ridge basalt, Sm-Nd isotopic system, nucleosynthetic anomalies
Reliable estimates of the compositions of the bulk silicate Earth (BSE) and depleted mantle (DM), which is the source of midocean ridge basalts (MORBs), are important in determining the degree of mantle processing and the thermal evolution of our planet. Chondritic meteorites have provided the most accurate basis for estimating the compositions of the Sun and planets (1). However, the Earth’s chemical composition is overall not chondritic; it has long been known that Earth is depleted in volatile elements (e.g., K) relative to chondrites (2). The assumption that the refractory elements (e.g., rare earth elements) in the Earth are present in chondritic proportions relative to each other is the basis for most estimates of the compositions of the BSE and DM (1, 3–6). This assumption has recently been challenged by several 142Nd/144Nd studies. Specifically, the 142Nd/144Nd of the Earth is ∼20 ppm higher than that of the ordinary chondrites (7–9). There are three ways to produce the observed 142Nd difference between the Earth and chondrites (10): (i) nucleosynthetic anomalies due to variations of either initial 146Sm/144Sm or initial 142Nd/144Nd ratios in the solar system (11, 12); (ii) difference in the Sm/Nd ratio between the BSE and chondrites (8, 13–15); and (iii) the BSE has a chondritic Sm/Nd ratio, but an early formed reservoir with a low 142Nd/144Nd ratio is hidden at the base of the mantle (7) or was eroded from the Earth by impacts (16), such that the accessible portion of the BSE has a high 142Nd/144Nd ratio.
Because of the short life (<200 Ma) of the oceanic crust, the extraction of the continental crust (CC) is the only major process depleting the Earth’s mantle. Consequently, the DM is complementary to the CC (3, 4). The sum of the CC and DM is the BSE in cases i and ii, and it is the accessible portion of the BSE in case iii, referred to as the “early depleted reservoir” (EDR) by Boyet and Carlson (7). These three scenarios have different implications for the composition of the BSE. In case i, the BSE and the chondritic reservoir have essentially the same Sm/Nd ratio (at a ±1% level). In case ii, the sum of the CC and DM is the BSE (8, 13–15), and it has a superchondritic Sm/Nd ratio (∼6% higher than the chondritic value). In case iii, the sum of the CC and DM is the accessible portion of the BSE (7, 16), and it also has a superchondritic Sm/Nd ratio. Such a superchondritic Sm/Nd ratio leads to a present-day εNd of ∼+7 for CC + DM (7, 8, 13). Here, εNd is the deviation of a sample’s 143Nd/144Nd ratio from the chondritic value (17) in parts per 104.
A BSE with a εNd of +7 is critical to the claim that some basalts sample the primitive mantle (PM) (14, 15). Specifically, lavas from some large igneous provinces (LIPs), such as Baffin Island or West Greenland, which cluster around the 4.5-Ga Geochron in a 207Pb/204Pb-206Pb/204Pb plot, have a εNd of ∼+7. Moreover, Baffin Island picrites with a εNd of ∼+7 have the highest terrestrial 3He/4He ratio, up to 50-fold the ratio of air (R/Ra) (18). Because high 3He/4He ratios are often taken as evidence for sampling a PM reservoir, it was concluded that these LIP lavas sample pure PM and do not incorporate any other mantle reservoirs (14, 15). In this scenario, PM has a superchondritic present-day εNd of ∼+7. However, the high 3He/4He ratios of 30- to 50-fold R/Ra associated with a εNd of ∼+7 could also result from mixing between PM and recycled slabs (19).
Extinct 146Sm-142Nd System
Subsequent to the publication of Boyet and Carlson (7), several studies have revealed a ε142Nd variation of 0.5 ε-units in chondrites, as well as possible correlations of the ε142Nd variation with nucleosynthetic anomalies in 135Ba, 144Sm, and 148Nd (9, 11, 12, 20) (Fig. 1). Specifically, Earth and some enstatite chondrites have a similar ε142Nd, whereas ordinary chondrites have ε142Nd ∼0.2 ε-units lower than that of the Earth, and carbonaceous chondrites have the lowest ε142Nd (up to 0.5 ε-units lower than that of the Earth) (figure 1 of ref. 9). In addition to the 142Nd similarity, Earth and enstatite chondrites have the same isotopic compositions of O, Ca, Ti, and Cr, which are elements that show substantial isotopic variation among different chondrite groups (21, 22). Jacobsen and Wasserburg (17) showed that chondrites have a very homogeneous 147Sm/144Nd ratio (0.1932–0.2000), which was later confirmed by Boyet and Carlson (7). This amount of Sm/Nd variation leads to ∼0.1 ε-units ε142Nd variation. In addition, ε142Nd is correlated with ε144Sm [a proton-process (p-process) only isotope], ε148Nd [a rapid neutron capture process (r-process) dominated isotope], and ε135Ba in chondrites, and the Earth plots on the chondrite trends, overlapping with enstatite chondrites (Fig. 1). The ε142Nd variation of 0.5 ε-units in chondrites is most likely of a nucleosynthetic origin (11, 12), resulting from small variations in the distribution of different nucleosynthetic components in the solar nebula. To summarize, there are sub–ε-level nucleosynthetic anomalies in Ba, Nd, and Sm isotopes in chondrites, implying that the chondritic reservoir is not homogeneous at this level. Consequently, it is inappropriate to claim that Earth and the chondritic reservoir have an ∼0.2 ε-units ε142Nd difference.
Fig. 1.
Variations in 144Sm/152Sm (or 144Sm/154Sm), 148Nd/144Nd, and 135Ba/136Ba vs. 142Nd/144Nd for chondrites. Isotopic ratios are expressed using ε-notation (parts per 10,000) relative to the Earth. 144Sm is a pure p-process isotope, and 148Nd is an r-process dominated isotope. The error bars for the Earth are taken as 5 ppm, which represents the best analytical uncertainty currently available in these isotopic measurements. The Earth plots within the chondrite trends. These trends imply a nucleosynthetic origin for the 142Nd variation in chondrites. The ∼0.5 ε-units ε142Nd variation in chondrites does not allow a statement that the Earth and the chondritic reference point have an ∼0.2 ε-units difference in ε142Nd (7). Similar plots have also been presented elsewhere (9, 35) showing correlations among these isotopic anomalies. Data are taken from refs. 7, 9, 12, and 20.
Because there are multiple pathways for producing a ε142Nd variation (10) and the chondritic reservoir is not homogeneous, ε142Nd is not suitable for investigating whether the BSE, or the sum of the CC and DM, has a superchondritic Sm/Nd ratio.
Long-Lived 147Sm-143Nd System
The long-lived 147Sm-143Nd system is not very sensitive to small nucleosynthetic anomalies between chondrites and the Earth because of much larger 143Nd variation due to radioactive decay (many ε units, compared with sub–ε-level variations in 142Nd/144Nd). Therefore, we use the 147Sm-143Nd isotopic system in MORBs and the CC to test whether the BSE could have a superchondritic 147Sm/144Nd ratio with a present-day εNd of +7 or higher. That the DM is complementary to the CC is widely used in literature to support both the chondritic Earth model and superchondritic Earth models (SCHEM) (3–6, 13, 23); consequently, the BSE composition can be reconstructed by summing the CC and DM. In a 143Nd/144Nd vs. 147Sm/144Nd plot, the CC, BSE, and DM should all plot on a common isochron, with the CC-BSE and DM-BSE tie-lines having the same slopes. Their slopes give the Sm-Nd model age of the CC in the simple case of a single continent formation event; that is, the age of the CC calculated from the resulting mantle depletion is equivalent to the age of the CC calculated from its 147Sm-143Nd isotopic composition. This single-event age is very close to the mean age of the CC for a more realistic model of forming the CC by a continuous process of melt-extraction over Earth history. If CC recycling is important (24), this single-event Sm-Nd model age could be many hundred million years younger than the average age of the CC (4). Nevertheless, if the 147Sm/144Nd and 143Nd/144Nd ratios of the DM and CC could be determined independently, they would provide a simple test of whether the BSE has a superchondritic 147Sm/144Nd ratio.
The 147Sm/144Nd ratio of the DM has previously been estimated by assuming either a chondritic (5, 6) or a superchondritic (13) BSE composition and a mean age of CC extraction (4, 25) that depleted the mantle (1.5–2.2 Ga). Boyet and Carlson (7, 23) offered a slightly different view of how the DM was generated. They started with a chondritic BSE, but global silicate differentiation within the first 30 Ma generated an EDR (7) with a superchondritic 147Sm/144Nd ratio (εNd of ∼+7.5) and an early crust [early enriched reservoir (EER)] with a subchondritic 147Sm/144Nd ratio. The EER was hidden at the base of the mantle after its formation and is inaccessible to mantle volcanism. In this scenario, the EDR is the accessible portion of the Earth, from which the CC was extracted to form the DM. A 147Sm/144Nd ratio of 0.229–0.249 for the DM was inferred using a chondritic BSE (5, 6), and a 147Sm/144Nd ratio of 0.217–0.222 for the DM was inferred if the BSE or the accessible portion of the BSE is superchondritic (13, 23).
We note that Boyet and Carlson (7) used a t1/2 of 103 Ma for 146Sm, which has been redetermined to be 68 Ma (26). Using this more recently measured t1/2, the early silicate differentiation in the model of Boyet and Carlson (7) has to occur within 20 Ma after the formation of the solar system (i.e., before Earth was fully accreted).
Estimating the 147Sm/144Nd Ratio of the DM
Testing whether the Earth has a chondritic or superchondritic 147Sm/144Nd ratio requires the 147Sm/144Nd of the DM to be estimated independent of the BSE composition.
MORBs are partial melts of the DM; thus, we use the Sm and Nd concentrations in MORBs to estimate the average 147Sm/144Nd ratio of the DM. There are three scenarios: (i) the DM has a homogeneous 147Sm/144Nd ratio, and the 147Sm/144Nd ratio variations in MORBs are caused by partial melting only; (ii) 147Sm/144Nd ratio variations in MORBs only reflect source heterogeneity; and (iii) 147Sm/144Nd ratio variations in MORBs reflect both partial melting effects and source heterogeneity. Although Langmuir et al. (27) demonstrated that the majority of the elemental variations in MORBs are controlled by variable degrees of partial melting, we note that the first two scenarios represent two end-member models. Thus, we estimate the average 147Sm/144Nd ratio of the DM for the first two scenarios (SI Text).
If the 147Sm/144Nd ratio variations in MORBs are only caused by variable degrees of partial melting (scenario i), the 147Sm/144Nd ratio of the DM can be estimated using a method highlighted by Hofmann et al. (28). In this approach, the intercept of the MORB trend in a 144Nd/147Sm vs. Nd diagram is very close to the 144Nd/147Sm ratio of their mantle source. Available Nd and Sm concentrations for MORBs, determined by the isotope dilution method (SI Text and Datasets S1 and S2), define a positive trend in a 144Nd/147Sm vs. Nd plot (Fig. 2A). The 147Sm/144Nd ratio of the DM estimated in this way is 0.255 ± 0.010 (2σ). The Nd concentrations, but not the 144Nd/147Sm ratio, in MORBs may also be affected by crystal fractionation. To correct for this effect, we calculate MORB Nd concentrations at 8% (wt/wt) MgO, called Nd8, following the method of Langmuir et al. (27). The 147Sm/144Nd ratio of the DM estimated from the 144Nd/147Sm vs. Nd8 correlation (Fig. 2B) is 0.269 ± 0.013 (2σ).
Fig. 2.
(A) 144Nd/147Sm vs. Nd (parts per million) for MORB samples (blue circles) for which Sm and Nd concentrations have been determined by isotope dilution (sample selection is provided in SI Text and Datasets S1 and S2). The average compositions of MORBs from normal ridge segments (red squares) (29, 30) are shown for comparison. The solid line is a robust linear least square regression obtained using MATLAB (MathWorks), and it passes through the estimated average compositions of MORBs from normal ridge segments. It has a slope of 0.088 ± 0.013 (2σ), an intercept of 3.88 ± 0.14 (2σ), and a linear correlation coefficient R2 of 0.48. The estimated 147Sm/144Nd ratio of the DM is 0.255 ± 0.010 (SI Text). Also shown are estimates of the chondritic 147Sm/144Nd ratio (0.1966) (17) and estimates of the 147Sm/144Nd ratio of the DM for the SCHEM (0.217–0.222) (13, 23). (B) 144Nd/147Sm vs. Nd8 (in parts per million by weight) for MORB samples (blue circles) (sample selection is provided in SI Text and Datasets S1 and S2). Nd8 values are Nd concentrations corrected to 8% (wt/wt) MgO following the method of Langmuir et al. (27) (Dataset S2). This trend has a slope of 0.120 ± 0.018 (2σ), an intercept of 3.66 ± 0.18 (2σ), and a linear correlation coefficient R2 of 0.51. The estimated 147Sm/144Nd ratio of the DM is 0.269 ± 0.013 (SI Text).
In scenario ii, where the 147Sm/144Nd ratio variations in MORBs only reflect source heterogeneity, the 147Sm/144Nd ratio of the DM is estimated using a forward partial melting model. The average 147Sm/144Nd ratio in MORBs from normal ridges (29, 30) is 0.212 ± 0.001 (2σm). Using a partial melting degree of 10%, proper mineral-melt partition coefficients (Table S1), and several types of partial melting models (Tables S2 and S3), the 147Sm/144Nd ratio of the DM is estimated to be 0.238–0.248 (SI Text). In this approach, the partial melting degree of 10% used for MORB generation is on the higher end (27). In addition, we only consider a spinel peridotite lithology for MORB generation, and arguments that melting of garnet peridotite or garnet pyroxenite is important in MORB generation have been made (26, 31–33). Because (Sm/Nd)garnet/(Sm/Nd)clinopyroxene > 1, including garnet in MORB generation would only increase the estimated 147Sm/144Nd ratio of the MORB source. Consequently, the 147Sm/144Nd ratio of the DM estimated in this way is the minimum value.
Because we discussed the two end-member scenarios (SI Text), we argue that the 147Sm/144Nd ratio of the DM is constrained between 0.238 and 0.269 (Fig. 3). The pale blue area in Fig. 3, where the 147Sm/144Nd = 0.211–0.227, represents the possible DM 147Sm/144Nd ratio range constrained by the CC composition under a SCHEM with a present-day εNd of +7. The pink area, where the 147Sm/144Nd = 0.227–0.264, represents the possible DM 147Sm/144Nd ratio range constrained by the CC under a chondritic Earth model. All our estimated 147Sm/144Nd ratios of the DM are higher than that required for a superchondritic Earth, and agree with those required for a chondritic Earth (Fig. 3). Therefore, the result that the 147Sm/144Nd ratio of the DM inferred from MORB data is higher than that required by the SCHEM is robust and not dependent on model details.
Fig. 3.
147Sm/144Nd ratio of the DM estimated by various approaches. Details are provided in SI Text. Estimates from the literature are also included for comparison. The pale blue area, 147Sm/144Nd = 0.211–0.227, represents the possible range for the 147Sm/144Nd ratio of the DM under a SCHEM with a present-day εNd of +7 and taking into account the possible ranges for the CC (see Fig. 4 legend). The pink area, 147Sm/144Nd = 0.227–0.264, represents the possible range for the 147Sm/144Nd ratio of the DM under a chondritic Earth model. All our DM estimates are higher than those required by the SCHEM but match those required by a chondritic Earth model. Therefore, the result that the 147Sm/144Nd ratios of the DM inferred from MORB data are higher than those required by the SCHEM is robust and not dependent on model details.
Test for a Superchondritic 147Sm/144Nd Ratio in the BSE
In a 143Nd/144Nd vs. 147Sm/144Nd plot, MORBs form a nearly horizontal trend, whereas the river water suspended loads (34), which sample large areas of the CC, form a nearly vertical trend with samples from young arc terrains plotting within the MORB field (Fig. 4A). The average 147Sm/144Nd and 143Nd/144Nd ratios of the CC are well constrained using Sm-Nd isotopic data from river water suspended loads (34) (Fig. 4A). The MORB 143Nd/144Nd data show limited variation, with a near-normal distribution. Our inferred plausible range of DM 143Nd/144Nd () covers the central 68% of the MORB histogram (Fig. 4A) and is typical of the MORB 143Nd/144Nd variations (29).
Fig. 4.
(A) 143Nd/144Nd vs. 147Sm/144Nd isotope systematics of MORBs and river water suspended loads (4, 34). The MORB data in the 143Nd/144Nd vs. 147Sm/144Nd diagram are only MORBs with isotope dilution Sm and Nd measurements (n = 166). (Right) Histogram of the 143Nd/144Nd ratio for unfiltered MORB samples (n = 2,485) (SI Text) is shown. There is no significant difference between the average 143Nd/144Nd ratio of the two datasets. The 143Nd/144Nd ratios of MORBs show limited variation and form a near-normal distribution with a peak at 0.51318, corresponding to a εNd of 10.6. The εNd is the 143Nd/144Nd deviation from the chondritic value (CHUR) in parts per 104
(17). The 143Nd/144Nd ratio of the DM is inferred to be
, corresponding to a εNd of
, and it agrees well with the previously published average 143Nd/144Nd ratio of 0.51311–0.51313 for normal (N)-MORBs (5, 29). For comparison, we also show positions for the chondritic reference values in this diagram (CHUR) (17), a SCHEM (13), an average CC (34) (147Sm/144Nd = 0.114 ± 0.010, 143Nd/144Nd = 0.51177 ± 0.00010), and a 4.567-Ga Geochron. (B) 143Nd/144Nd vs. 147Sm/144Nd systematics of major reservoirs in the Earth. The CHUR, SCHEM, and average CC are the same as in A. Our estimate of the DM in this diagram (brown box) comes from the 147Sm/144Nd ratio obtained based on MORB data and the Nd isotopic composition from A (147Sm/144Nd = 0.238–0.269, 143Nd/144Nd = 0.51304–0.51320). The possible range of the DM-CC tie-line is shown as a gray field outlined by two red lines (by taking the end-member values of DM and CC), and its intersection with the 4.567-Ga Geochron represents our estimated BSE composition (147Sm/144Nd = 0.183–0.204, 143Nd/144Nd = 0.51223–0.51286, and εNd = −8.0 to +4.4). The CC-CHUR tie-line has a 147Sm-143Nd model age of 1.60 Ga, consistent with the average age of the CC (a detailed discussion is provided in ref. 4). Possible mantle-crust differentiation ages can be estimated by connecting the extreme values of the DM and CC (e.g., the lower right corner of the CC with the upper left corner of the DM). This leads to a mantle-crust differentiation age of 1.1–2.0 Ga, consistent with the age of the CC (4). The CHUR point lies within the possible range of intersections between the CC-DM isochron and the Geochron. The SCHEM point lies substantially above this range. Thus, there is no evidence for a SCHEM based on 147Sm-143Nd isotopic variations in the CC and MORBs.
We now test whether the Earth could have a superchondritic 147Sm/144Nd ratio using the 147Sm/144Nd and 143Nd/144Nd ratios of the DM and CC (Fig. 4B). The BSE must be at the intersection of the 4.567-Ga Geochron and the DM-CC tie-line in this diagram. Taking into account the possible DM and CC ranges, the DM-CC tie-line crosses the 4.567-Ga Geochron at a 147Sm/144Nd ratio of 0.183–0.204 and a 143Nd/144Nd ratio of 0.51223–0.51286 (εNd = −8.0 to +4.4). The large uncertainties associated with the intersection of the DM-CC tie-line and the 4.567-Ga Geochron result from the large uncertainties in the 147Sm/144Nd and 143Nd/144Nd ratios of the DM and CC. This intersection overlaps with the chondritic point; however, even taking into account the large uncertainty, the SCHEM plots well above this intersection (Fig. 4B). Moreover, the CC-chondritic uniform reservoir (CHUR) tie-line passes through the possible DM range. This CC-CHUR tie-line has a 147Sm-143Nd model age of 1.60 Ga, consistent with the average age of the CC (a detailed discussion is provided in ref. 4). Therefore, the 147Sm-143Nd isotope systematics of the DM and CC, considered together, are inconsistent with a superchondritic Earth with a present-day εNd of +7. Our results demonstrate that the BSE has a near-chondritic 147Sm/144Nd ratio.
The existence of a hidden reservoir at the base of the mantle proposed to explain the observed ε142Nd difference between the Earth and ordinary chondrites (7) is also inconsistent with the 147Sm-143Nd isotope systematics of the CC-DM system, because it requires an extremely young age for the CC. In this case, the accessible portion of the Earth (EDR), from which the CC was extracted, has a present-day εNd of +8 to +12 (143Nd/144Nd = 0.51305–0.51325) (7), overlapping with present-day MORB values. Consequently, an EDR-DM tie-line has a near-zero slope, implying an unrealistically young age (approximately zero age) for the CC. Furthermore, because the EDR and DM have the same εNd, there is no way to balance the low εNd values in the CC. Because loss of an early crust through collisional erosion during the end stages of terrestrial accretion (16) in essence represents a reservoir hidden in space, such a scenario is also inconsistent with the 147Sm-143Nd isotope systematics and can be ruled out.
Assuming a simple CC growth model in which the CC started to grow at 4.4 Ga at a constant rate, Caro and Bourdon (13) have argued that a chondritic Earth model cannot explain the radiogenic εNd in the Archean mantle. They argued instead that the positive εNd found in the Archean mantle requires a superchondritic bulk Earth 147Sm/144Nd ratio (figure 11 of ref. 13). However, using a more realistic CC growth model in which recycling of the CC is allowed, Jacobsen (4) was able to reproduce the trend of radiogenic εNd in the Archean mantle with a 147Sm/144Nd ratio evolution that is consistent with the updated DM estimate provided in this paper. The evolution curves in Fig. 5 were evaluated by Jacobsen (4) to be consistent with the data available in 1988. For comparison, we show the εNd estimates for the average DM compiled in 2010 by Caro and Bourdon (13) and used in their modeling. We also show that the end point of the 147Sm/144Nd ratio evolution from Jacobsen (4) is consistent with the estimate given in this paper. Thus, we conclude that the Sm-Nd isotopic evolution of the mantle through time is consistent with a chondritic Earth and that the conclusion of Caro and Bourdon (13) is only valid for a particularly simplistic model calculation.
Fig. 5.
Model evolution of the DM εNd and 147Sm/144Nd ratio through time. The data points are average DM compositions and Isua supracrustals from the recent compilation of Caro and Bourdon (13). The present-day DM estimates are from this study. The model curves are from Jacobsen (4) using a chondritic Earth model. The evolution of the DM εNd is consistent with a chondritic Earth model with CC recycling (4) but not with a simple CC growth model without CC recycling as presented by Caro and Bourdon (13). Our estimate of the present-day DM 147Sm/144Nd ratio is also consistent with the model prediction of Jacobsen (4).
Conclusions
In summary, the 147Sm-143Nd isotope systematics of the CC and DM imply that the BSE has a near-chondritic 147Sm/144Nd ratio and are inconsistent with the BSE having a present-day εNd of +7 as required by the SCHEM (7, 8, 13–15). The ∼0.5 ε-units ε142Nd variation in the Earth and chondrities most likely results from variations in the mixing proportions of different nucleosynthetic components. Given the ∼0.5 ε-units ε142Nd variation (7–9, 20) in bulk chondrites but ≤±2% variations in 147Sm/144Nd ratios (17), it seems inappropriate to attribute the ∼0.2 ε-units ε142Nd difference between the Earth and ordinary chondrites to a 6% difference in 147Sm/144Nd ratios.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We appreciate discussions on the topic of this paper with A. Brandon, R. W. Carlson, C. Chauvel, T. Elliott, M. Humayun, W. F. McDonough, C. H. Langmuir, R. J. O’Connell, G. J. Wasserburg, and Q. Yin. This work was partly supported by National Science Foundation Awards EAR-1144727 and OCE-0929193 and by National Aeronautics and Space Administration Award NNX12AH65G.
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1222252110/-/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.McDonough WF, Sun SS. The composition of the Earth. Chem Geol. 1995;120:223–253. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wasserburg GJ, Macdonald GJF, Hoyle F, Fowler WA. Relative Contributions of Uranium, Thorium, and Potassium to Heat Production in the Earth. Science. 1964;143(3605):465–467. doi: 10.1126/science.143.3605.465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hofmann AW. Chemical differentiation of the Earth: The relationship between mantle, continental crust and oceanic crust. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 1988;90:297–314. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jacobsen SB. Isotopic and chemical constraints on mantle-crust evolution. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 1988;52:1341–1350. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Salters VJM, Stracke A. Composition of the depleted mantle. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems. 2004;5(5):Q05004. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Workman RK, Hart SR. Major and trace element composition of the depleted MORB mantle (DMM) Earth Planet Sci Lett. 2005;231:53–72. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Boyet M, Carlson RW. 142Nd evidence for early (>4.53 Ga) global differentiation of the silicate Earth. Science. 2005;309(5734):576–581. doi: 10.1126/science.1113634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Caro G, Bourdon B, Halliday AN, Quitté G. Super-chondritic Sm/Nd ratios in Mars, the Earth and the Moon. Nature. 2008;452(7185):336–339. doi: 10.1038/nature06760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gannoun A, Boyet M, Rizo H, El Goresy A. 146Sm-142Nd systematics measured in enstatite chondrites reveals a heterogeneous distribution of 142Nd in the solar nebula. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(19):7693–7697. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1017332108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jacobsen SB, et al. Isotopes as clues to the origin and earliest differentiation history of the Earth. Philos Transact A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2008;366(1883):4129–4162. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ranen MC, Jacobsen SB. Barium isotopes in chondritic meteorites: Implications for planetary reservoir models. Science. 2006;314(5800):809–812. doi: 10.1126/science.1132595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Andreasen R, Sharma M. Solar nebula heterogeneity in p-process samarium and neodymium isotopes. Science. 2006;314(5800):806–809. doi: 10.1126/science.1131708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Caro G, Bourdon B. Non-chondritic Sm/Nd ratio in the terrestrial planets: Consequences for the geochemical evolution of the mantle-crust system. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2010;74:3333–3349. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jackson MG, et al. Evidence for the survival of the oldest terrestrial mantle reservoir. Nature. 2010;466(7308):853–856. doi: 10.1038/nature09287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jackson MG, Carlson RW. An ancient recipe for flood-basalt genesis. Nature. 2011;476(7360):316–319. doi: 10.1038/nature10326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Campbell IH, O’Neill HS. Evidence against a chondritic Earth. Nature. 2012;483(7391):553–558. doi: 10.1038/nature10901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jacobsen SB, Wasserburg GJ. Sm-Nd isotopic evolution of chondrites and achondrites, II. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 1984;67:137–150. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Stuart FM, Lass-Evans S, Fitton RM, Ellam RM. High 3He/4He ratios in picritic basalts from Baffin Island and the role of a mixed reservoir in mantle plumes. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 2003;104:364–380. doi: 10.1038/nature01711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gonnermann HM, Mukhopadhyay S. Preserving noble gases in a convecting mantle. Nature. 2009;459(7246):560–563. doi: 10.1038/nature08018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Carlson RW, Boyet M, Horan M. Chondrite barium, neodymium, and samarium isotopic heterogeneity and early Earth differentiation. Science. 2007;316(5828):1175–1178. doi: 10.1126/science.1140189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Trinquier A, et al. Origin of nucleosynthetic isotope heterogeneity in the solar protoplanetary disk. Science. 2009;324(5925):374–376. doi: 10.1126/science.1168221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhang J, Dauphas N, Davis AM, Leya I, Fedkin A. The proto-Earth as a significant source of lunar material. Nat Geosci. 2012;5:251–255. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Boyet M, Carlson RW. A new geochemical model for the Earth’s mantle inferred from 146Sm-142Nd systematics. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 2006;250:254–268. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jackson MG, et al. The return of subducted continental crust in Samoan lavas. Nature. 2007;448(7154):684–687. doi: 10.1038/nature06048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Jacobsen SB, Wasserburg GJ. The mean age of mantle and crustal reservoirs. J Geophys Res. 1979;84:7411–7427. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kinoshita N, et al. A shorter 146Sm half-life measured and implications for 146Sm-142Nd chronology in the solar system. Science. 2012;335(6076):1614–1617. doi: 10.1126/science.1215510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Langmuir C, Klein E, Plank T. Petrological systematics of mid-ocean ridge basalts: Constraints on melt generation beneath ocean ridges. In: Morgan JP, Blackman DK, Sinton JM, editors. Mantle Flow and Melt Generation at Mid-Ocean Ridges. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union; 1992. pp. 183–280. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hofmann AW, Feigenson MD, Raczek I. Case studies on the origin of basalt: III. Petrogenesis of the Mauna Ulu eruption, Kilauea, 1969-1971. Contrib Mineral Petrol. 1984;88:24–35. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Su YJ. 2002. Mid-ocean ridge basalt trace element systematics: Constraints from database management, ICP-MS analyses, global data compilation, and petrologic modeling. PhD thesis (Columbia University, New York)
- 30.Arevalo R, Jr, McDonough WF. Chemical variations and regional diversity observed in MORB. Chem Geol. 2010;271:70–85. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hirschmann M, Stolper EM. A possible role for garnet pyroxenite in the origin of the “garnet signature” in MORB. Contrib Mineral Petrol. 1996;124:185–208. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sobolev AV, et al. The amount of recycled crust in sources of mantle-derived melts. Science. 2007;316(5823):412–417. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Salters VJM, Hart SR. The hafnium paradox and the role of garnet in the source of mid-ocean-ridge basalts. Nature. 1989;342(6248):420–422. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Goldstein SJ, Jacobsen SB. Nd and Sr isotopic systematics of river water suspended material: Implications for crustal evolution. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 1988;87:249–265. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Qin L, Carlson RW, Alexander CM. Correlated nucleosynthetic isotopic variability in Cr, Sr, Ba, Sm, Nd and Hf in Murchison and QUE 97008. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2011;75:7806–7828. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.