Abstract
Objectives: To determine whether coadjuvant antineoplastic treatment can influence the number and size of bone exposures among patients with intravenous bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (iBRONJ), and to analyze the buccodental condition of these patients. Material and methods: The study sample comprised 67 patients with iBRONJ, 53 patients without iBRONJ receiving treatment with intravenous bisphosphonates, and 36 healthy subjects. In all three groups, measurements were made of the CAO index and of resting whole saliva and stimulated whole saliva. In the patients with iBRONJ, the size (cm) and number of bone exposures were recorded. The data obtained were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA), the Mann-Whitney U-test, and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: A total of 57.6% of the patients presented single bone exposure, 25.4% presented two, and 17% more than two exposures. The mean exposure size was 2.3±1.9 cm. Neither the bivariate analysis nor the multivariate multiple regression analysis found coadjuvant antineoplastic treatment to exert a statistically significant effect upon the number and size of bone exposures. On the other hand, there were statistically significant differences among the three study groups in relation to the CAO index (p=0.02) and the number of missing teeth (p=0.00). The resting whole saliva and stimulated whole saliva levels were similar in the three groups, though the patients with osteonecrosis of the jaws showed comparatively lower SWS levels. Conclusions: Coadjuvant antineoplastic treatment alone appears to exert no influence upon the size and number of bone exposures in iBRONJ. The patients with this disease show a higher CAO index and a larger number of missing teeth.
Key words:Osteonecrosis of the jaws, bisphosphonates, bone exposure, CAO index, resting whole saliva, stimulated whole saliva.
Introduction
Osteonecrosis of the jaws is a form of chronic and slow-evolving osteomyelitis with no tendency towards spontaneous healing. The most widely known clinical form is osteoradionecrosis, a form of osteomyelitis associated to radiotherapy (1). Since the year 2003, a new form of osteonecrosis has been described, referred to as bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (BRONJ), which is defined as the presence of necrotic bone exposed within the oral cavity for over 6-8 weeks in patients receiving or who have received treatment with bisphosphonates (BPs), and who have not undergone radiotherapy in the cervicofacial region (2,3). Instead of necrotic bone exposure, the disease in some cases is characterized by mucosal ulceration and symptoms - usually pain and suppuration, and even orosinusal communications and pathological fractures. This condition is also regarded as bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (4,5).
The pathogenesis of BRONJ is not fully understood. The most widely accepted hypothesis refers to the existence of an alteration in physiological bone remodeling secondary to intense inhibition of the osteoclasts. Bisphosphonates inhibit osteoclast reabsorption activity by blocking 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA), the enzyme in charge of osteoclast protein prenylation (6). The appearance of cases of BRONJ in patients receiving treatment with denosumab (7), an anti-RANK ligand monoclonal antibody, confirms the theory that osteoclast inhibition is the triggering event underlying BRONJ (8). The BPs have also been attributed with certain antiangiogenic and antitumor effects (9).
BRONJ has very characteristic clinical manifestations that allow it to be easily identified from first contact with the patient (10).
Major risk factors for BRONJ are the potency and duration of intravenous BP treatment, particularly with zoledronic acid, and dentoalveolar surgery – fundamentally extractions (11). Other treatments commonly administered to cancer patients, such as corticosteroids, immunosuppressors and hormone therapy, may also increase the risk of suffering BRONJ (12). It has been suggested that certain polymorphisms of the CYP2C8 gene could induce a degree of genetic susceptibility towards BRONJ, though this finding has not been confirmed by other studies (13).
The great majority of authors and expert panels agree on the importance of preventing BRONJ through the establishment and maintenance of adequate buccodental health (2,3,14,15). A rapid and simple method for assessing buccodental health is the CAO index, described by Klein, Palmer and Knutson (16), and adopted by the World Health Organization (WHO) for the conduction of oral health surveys, with the measurement of present and past caries in an individual or population.
Considering the natural tendency of intravenous BRONJ lesions to progress and spread over time (Fig. 1), the first objective of the present study was the evaluation of whether coadjuvant antineoplastic treatment such as corticosteroids, thalidomide, interferon and hormones can influence the number and size of bone exposures. On the other hand, we have only found one publication comparing the buccodental conditions of patients receiving treatment with intravenous bisphosphonates versus those of patients who have already developed osteonecrosis of the jaws (17). Our second objective therefore has been the analysis and comparison of buccodental health and of the resting whole saliva and stimulated whole saliva levels in a group of patients with iBRONJ versus a group of patients administered BP via the intravenous route but who do not present BRONJ, and un control group of healthy patients.
Figure 1.
Images of one same patient with multiple bone exposure sites, corresponding to intravenous bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws.
Material and Methods
All patients were seen in the Department of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery (Valencia University General Hospital, Valencia, Spain) during the period between March 2006 and July 2009, in collaboration with the Departments of Hematological Oncology of Valencia University Clinic Hospital, La Fe University Hospital and Valencia University General Hospital (Valencia, Spain). Informed consent was obtained in all cases, and the study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Valencia University General Hospital.
The study sample consisted of 156 patients, 105 women (67.3%) and 51 men (32.7%), with a mean age (± SD) of 62.3±10.9 years. Three groups were established:
- Group A: 67 patients administered intravenous bisphosphonates and who developed iBRONJ: 39 women and 28 men, with a mean age of 63.7 ± 11.6 years.
- Group B: 53 patients administered intravenous bisphosphonates but without BRONJ: 37 women and 16 men, with a mean age of 60.3±10.9 years.
- Group C: 36 healthy controls matched for age and gender to the other two groups.
Data were collected referred to the background malignancy, iBRONJ and buccodental condition. For the clinical exploration we used an intraoral mirror and exploratory probe. The diagnosis of BRONJ was based on the corresponding clinical and radiological criteria (2,3,12). Samples of resting whole saliva (RWS) and stimulated whole saliva (SWS) were collected. Saliva measurement was not possible in 28 patients in group A. In the remaining 128 patients, saliva samples were collected as described below.
Sampling was carried out early in the morning in the dental clinic, under fasting conditions or after at least two hours without oral ingestion of any kind. Before collecting the saliva sample, the patients were instructed to rinse the oral cavity with desalinized water and then expel the water. The RWS sample was collected first, instructing the patients to expel the saliva accumulated in the floor of the mouth every 60 seconds over a period of 5 minutes. Emphasis was placed on the importance of not swallowing the saliva produced. The saliva was collected through a glass funnel in a 15-ml, millimetered Falcon-type tube (VWR Internacional Eurolab, S.L., Barcelona, Spain). Two minutes after completing collection of the resting sample, the SWS sample was collected. Paraffin blocks measuring 1.5 x 1 x 0.5 cm in size were used to this effect (CRT Paraffin Vivadent®. Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Liechtenstein), instructing the patients to keep a uniform chewing rhythm throughout the procedure (average of 70 mastications/minute), and to avoid swallowing the saliva produced. In contrast to the sampling of resting saliva, the saliva produced in the first two minutes was discarded, with collection of the saliva generated in the subsequent 5 minutes, using the same system as in the case of RWS sampling. The amount of saliva obtained under both resting and stimulated conditions was then measured, expressed as ml of saliva/5 minutes.
The predominant background malignancy in groups A and B was multiple myeloma (45.8%), followed by breast (41.5%), prostate (9.3%), lung (1.7%), kidney (0.8%) and bladder cancer (0.8%). The most frequently administered bisphosphonate was zoledronic acid (97.5%). The patients in group B received only zoledronic acid, while in group A, 66.2% of the patients received zoledronic acid, 31.8% received zoledronic acid associated to pamidronate, and 2% received only pamidronate ( Table 1).
Table 1. Comparison between groups A and B referred to type of primary neoplasm, type of bisphosphonate (BP) administered, and duration of treatment.
The data obtained were analyzed using the SPSS version 15.0 statistical package (SPSS Inc., Chicago IL, USA). A descriptive study was made, calculating the mean, standard deviation and frequency distribution. The comparative study in turn was based on analysis of variance (ANOVA), the Mann-Whitney U-test, and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Statistical significance was considered for p<0.05.
Results
-Number and size of bone exposures
A total of 57.6% of the patients presented single bone exposure, 25.4% presented two, 5.1% three, 10.2% four, and 1.7% presented 8 exposures (Fig. 2). The mean exposure size was 2.3±1.9 cm (median 2 cm). In the bivariate analysis, none of the coadjuvant antineoplastic treatments considered (corticosteroids, thalidomide, interferon and hormones) were significantly related to either the size or number of exposures ( Table 2). In turn, in none of the logistic regression analysis models was coadjuvant antineoplastic treatment able to explain and predict the total size or number of exposures.
Figure 2.
Number of bone exposure sites recorded in the patients with intravenous bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws.
Table 2. Results of the bivariate analysis (Mann-Whitney U-test) of the number and size of bone exposures.
-CAO index
The mean CAO index (ICAO) for the total sample was 14.7. In group A (BRONJ) the mean ICAO was 16.8, versus 12.5 in group B (without BRONJ) and 13.4 in group C (control). The difference in ICAO distribution in the three groups was statistically sig-nificant (p=0.02).
On analyzing ICAO more in detail, the global mean number of caried teeth was found to be 1.6, with individualized values of 1.7, 1.8 and 0.8 for groups A, B and C, respectively. These differences were not statistically significant (p>0.05). The global mean number of missing teeth was 10.7. Statistically significant differences were observed in the mean number of missing teeth among the three study groups: 14.3 in group A, 6.8 in group B and 9.1 among the controls (group C) (p=0.00). Lastly, the global mean number of filled teeth was 3.4. No statistically significant differences were observed in the mean number of filled teeth among the groups: 3.1 in group A, 3.8 in group B and 3.4 in group C (p>0.05). The results referred to the CAO index and its variables are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3. Mean values in each study group corresponding to the CAO index and its variables.
-Resting whole saliva (RWS) and stimulated whole saliva (SWS)
The global mean amount of RWS obtained in the 128 patients was 1.1 ml saliva/5 minutes. In group A (BRONJ) the mean amount was 1.3 ml/5 minutes, versus 1.1 ml/5 minutes in group B (without BRONJ), and 1 ml/5 minutes in group C (controls). In turn, the global mean amount of SWS obtained was 3.1 ml saliva/5 minutes. In group A the mean amount was 2.7 ml/5 minutes, versus 3.2 ml/5 minutes in group B, and 3.3 ml/5 minutes in group C. No statistically significant differences were found on comparing the mean amounts of RWS and SWS obtained in each group (p>0.05) ( Table 4).
Table 4. Mean values in each study group corresponding to resting whole saliva (RWS) and stimulated whole saliva (SWS).
Discussion
The two main disorders associated to prolonged bisphosphonate therapy are BRONJ and pathological femoral fracture (18). The apparently exclusive location of BRONJ in the oral cavity, and specifically in jaw bone, appears to be related to the fact that this bone has a high turnover rate, which favors the accumulation of large amounts of bisphosphonates (19). The main risk factors for BRONJ are prolonged intravenous bisphosphonate therapy involving high-potency drugs, dentoalveolar surgical procedures, poorly fitting dental prostheses and intraoral trauma (20). Other factors that have also been related to BRONJ are chemotherapy, antiangiogenic drugs such as thalidomide, diabetes mellitus, corticosteroids, genetic susceptibility and deficient oral hygiene (21).
The different published series on osteonecrosis of the jaws generally do not describe the number or size of the bone exposure sites. At most, mention is made of the location of exposure in the upper or lower jaw, or both (22,23). We have found only three studies, published by Bagán et al. (1,10,11), in which express mention is made of the number of areas of exposed bone and their global mean size.
More than one-half of our patients (57.6%) presented a single bone exposure site, while 25.4% had two and 17% presented more than two exposures. This latter subgroup included patients with up to 8 iBRONJ exposure sites. According to Thumbigere-Math et al. (24), 80% of all spontaneously manifesting iBRONJ lesions measure 1 cm or less in diameter, and a little over one-half of the lesions appearing after a dental procedure (56.3%) have these same dimensions (i.e., 1 cm or less). In our series, 50% of the patients presented a lesion size of between 1-3 cm, though there were two individuals with an unusually large lesion (7 cm), and one patient with an extreme lesion size of 10 cm. It should be underscored that on the basis of our findings, coadjuvant antineoplastic treatment alone exerted no influence upon the size and number of osteonecrosis areas in the context of iBRONJ.
A greater CAO index and a larger number of missing teeth were found in the patients with iBRONJ (p<0.05). The study published by Carmagnola et al. (17), which did not include a control group, reported no statistically significant differences in either the CAO index or in residual periodontal support between 20 patients with iBRONJ and 19 patients subjected to intravenous bisphosphonates without BRONJ. In that same publication, 50% of the patients with iBRONJ had a history of tooth extraction, versus 26.3% of the subjects without BRONJ. In our series, 73.1% of the patients in group A (BRONJ) had undergone tooth extraction, versus only 9.4% of those in group B (without BRONJ). These figures are similar to those recorded in the first published series on osteonecrosis of the jaws, in which 77% of the patients had undergone dental extraction (23). Likewise, Boonyapakorn et al. (25), in a study of 80 patients with BRONJ, found 77% of them to have a history of extraction. We found no statistically significant differences among the three groups in terms of the number of caried teeth or the number of filled teeth (p>0.05), though both caried and filled teeth were more prevalent in group B.
The RWS levels were practically the same in all three groups (p>0.05). Certain differences were observed in the case of SWS, with lesser levels among the patients with BRONJ – though statistical significance was not reached.
At the time of intraoral exploration and collection of the saliva samples, 94% of the patients with BRONJ were receiving chemotherapy – a percentage that dropped to 68% in the case of group B (without BRONJ). These data could partially account for the observed differences among the study groups as regards buccodental condition. The fact that the patients with BRONJ had a longer duration of treatment with bisphosphonates, and the concomitant administration of chemotherapy, could have influenced the existence of oral cavity disorders such as diminished salivary gland function, increased susceptibility to fungal, viral and bacterial infections, and pro-pathogenic changes in the oral microflora (26,27). The greater number of missing teeth among the patients in group A might be related to the above.
A growing number of studies underscore the beneficial effects of oral health prevention and maintenance strategies in patients programmed for or who are already receiving intravenous bisphosphonate therapy (28,29). In relation to BRONJ, we feel that studies addressing the buccodental health of these patients are required.
Conclusion
Coadjuvant antineoplastic treatment alone appears to exert no influence upon the size and number of exposed bone sites in the context of i.v. BRONJ – the patients with this disease in turn showing a comparatively greater CAO index and a larger number of missing teeth.
Acknowledgments
This study was sponsored by Novartis®.
References
- 1.Bagan JV, Jiménez Y, Hernández S, Murillo J, Díaz JM, Poveda R. Osteonecrosis of the jaws by intravenous bisphosphonates and osteoradionecrosis: a comparative study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009;14:e616–9. doi: 10.4317/medoral.14.e616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bagán J, Blade J, Cozar JM, Constela M, García Sanz R, Gómez Veiga F. Recommendations for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) in cancer patients treated with bisphosphonates. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2007;12:E336–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ruggiero SL, Dodson TB, Assael LA, Landesberg R, Marx RE, Mehrotra B; American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons position paper on bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws--2009 update. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:2–12. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bagan JV, Hens-Aumente E, Leopoldo-Rodado M, Poveda-Roda R, Bagan L. Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws: study of the staging system in a series of clinical cases. Oral Oncol. 2012 ;48:753–7. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fedele S, Porter SR, D'Aiuto F, Aljohani S, Vescovi P, Manfredi M. Nonexposed variant of bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw: a case series. Am J Med. 2010;123:1060–4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.04.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bagan JV, Jimenez Y, Diaz JM, Murillo J, Sanchis JM, Poveda R. Osteonecrosis of the jaws in intravenous bisphosphonate use: Proposal for a modification of the clinical classification. Oral Oncol. 2009;45:645–6. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Aghaloo TL, Felsenfeld AL, Tetradis S. Osteonecrosis of the jaw in a patient on Denosumab. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68:959–63. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.10.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ruggiero SL. Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: an overview. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011;1218:38–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05768.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gómez-Font R, Martínez-García ML, Olmos-Martínez JM. Osteochemonecrosis of the jaws due to bisphosphonate treatments. Update. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2008;13:E318–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bagan JV, Murillo J, Jimenez Y, Poveda R, Milian MA, Sanchis JM. Avascular jaw osteonecrosis in association with cancer chemotherapy: series of 10 cases. J Oral Pathol Med. 2005;34:120–3. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2004.00269.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bagan JV, Jimenez Y, Murillo J, Hernandez S, Poveda R, Sanchis JM. Jaw osteonecrosis associated with bisphosphonates: multiple exposed areas and its relationship to teeth extractions. Study of 20 cases. Oral Oncol. 2006;42:327–9. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2005.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Siddiqi A, Payne AG, Zafar S. Bisphosphonate-induced osteonecrosis of the jaw: a medical enigma? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108:e1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.04.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Such E, Cervera J, Terpos E, Bagán JV, Avaria A, Gómez I. CYP2C8 gene polymorphism and bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2011;96:1557–9. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2011.042572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Advisory Task Force on Bisphosphonate-Related Ostenonecrosis of the Jaws, American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons position paper on bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:369–76. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pont- Fernández N, Estefani- Fresco R, Aguirre-Urizar JM. Bisphosphonates and oral pathology I. General and preventive aspects. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2006 ;11:E396–400. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Knutson JW. Workshop in dental health planning; present status of preventive procedures. J Or State Dent Assoc. 1947 ;16:34–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Carmagnola D, Celestino S, Abati S. Dental and periodontal history of oncologic patients on parenteral bisphosphonates with or without osteonecrosis of the jaws: a pilot study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;106:e10–5. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Compston J. Pathophysiology of atypical femoral fractures and osteonecrosis of the jaw. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22:2951–61. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1804-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dickinson M, Prince HM, Kirsa S, Zannettino A, Gibbs SD, Mileshkin L. Osteonecrosis of the jaw complicating bisphosphonate treatment for bone disease in multiple myeloma: an overview with recommendations for prevention and treatment. Intern Med J. 2009;39:304–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2008.01824.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Migliorati CA, Epstein JB, Abt E, Berenson JR. Osteonecrosis of the jaw and bisphosphonates in cancer: a narrative review. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2011;7:34–42. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2010.195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sardella A, Carrassi A, Tarozzi M, Lodi G. Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws associated with photodynamic therapy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69:e314–6. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.06.219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Khosla S, Burr D, Cauley J, Dempster DW, Ebeling PR, Felsenberg D. Bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw: report of a task force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22:1479–91. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.0707onj. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Marx RE. Pamidronate (Aredia) and zoledronate (Zometa) induced avascular necrosis of the jaws: a growing epidemic. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61:1115–7. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(03)00720-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Thumbigere-Math V, Sabino MC, Gopalakrishnan R, Huckabay S, Dudek AZ, Basu S. Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: clinical features, risk factors, management, and treatment outcomes of 26 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:1904–13. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Boonyapakorn T, Schirmer I, Reichart PA, Sturm I, Massenkeil G. Bisphosphonate-induced osteonecrosis of the jaws: prospective study of 80 patients with multiple myeloma and other malignancies. Oral Oncol. 2008;44:857–69. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2007.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jensen SB, Mouridsen HT, Bergmann OJ, Reibel J, Brünner N, Nauntofte B. Oral mucosal lesions, microbial changes, and taste disturbances induced by adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;106:217–26. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Napeñas JJ, Brennan MT, Coleman S, Kent ML, Noll J, Frenette G. Molecular methodology to assess the impact of cancer chemotherapy on the oral bacterial flora: a pilot study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109:554–60. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dimopoulos MA, Kastritis E, Bamia C, Melakopoulos I, Gika D, Roussou M. Reduction of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) after implementation of preventive measures in patients with multiple myeloma treated with zoledronic acid. Ann Oncol. 2009;20:117–20. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nicolatou-Galitis O, Papadopoulou E, Sarri T, Boziari P, Karayianni A, Kyrtsonis MC. Osteonecrosis of the jaw in oncology patients treated with bisphosphonates: prospective experience of a dental oncology referral center. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;112:195–202. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.02.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]