Skip to main content
Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine logoLink to Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine
. 2011 Dec;1(6):482–487. doi: 10.1016/S2221-1691(11)60105-6

Alteration of some cellular function in amikacin resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa transfected macrophages: a time dependent approach

Subhankari Prasad Chakraborty 1, Santanu KarMahapatra 1, Sabyasachi Das 1, Somenath Roy 1,*
PMCID: PMC3614218  PMID: 23569818

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the free radical generation and antioxidant enzymes status in murine peritoneal macrophage during in vitro amikacin resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ARPA) treatment with different time interval.

Methods

Peritoneal macrophages were treated with 1×108 CFU/mL ARPA cell suspension in vitro for different time interval (1, 2, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h) and super oxide anion generation, NO generation, reduced glutathione level and antioxidant enzymes status were analyzed.

Results

Super oxide anion generation and NO generation got peak at 12 h, indicating maximal free radical generation through activation of NADPH oxidase in murine peritoneal macrophages during ARPA transfection. Reduced glutathione level and antioxidant enzymes status were decreased significantly (P<0.05) with increasing time of ARPA transfection. All the changes in peritoneal macrophages after 12 h in vitro ARPA transfection had significant difference (P<0.05).

Conclusions

From this study, it may be summarized that in vitro ARPA infection not only generates excess free radical but also affects the antioxidant system and glutathione cycle in murine peritoneal macrophage.

Keywords: Antioxidant enzyme, ARPA, Oxidative stress, Peritoneal macrophage, Free radical generation

1. Introduction

Macrophages are ubiquitous mononuclear phagocytes in mammalian tissues[1]. The peritoneal macrophages, which are representative of other macrophage population, are easily available in mice in greater amount than blood phagocytes. Macrophages, the important immune cell involved in innate immune system, engulf large particles (>0.5 µm in diameter) such as intact microbes. The cell surrounds the particle with intension of its plasma membrane by an energy and cytoskeleton dependent process, resulting in the formation of an intracellular vesicle called phagosome, which contains the ingested particle. Macrophages are capable of ingesting and digesting exogenous antigens as whole microorganisms and insoluble particles; and endogenous matter such as injured of dead host cells, cellular debris, and activated clotting factor by means of phagocytosis. During phagocytosis, a metabolic process known as respiratory burst occurs in activated macrophages. This process results in the activation of a membrane-bound oxidase that catalyzes the reduction of oxygen to superoxide anion, a reactive oxygen intermediate that is extremely toxic to ingested microorganism. Superoxide anion also generates other powerful oxidizing agent including H2O2 and hydroxyl radical[2]. When macrophages are activated, they begin to express high level of NOS that produces NO, which has potent antimicrobial activity. Activated macrophage produces a number of reactive oxygen intermediates (ROI) and reactive nitrogen intermediates (RNI) that have potent antimicrobial activity[3].

Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) is a gram-negative, aerobic, rod-shaped bacterium with unipolar motility[4]. It belongs to specie of the genus Pseudomonas[5]. An opportunistic, nosocomial pathogen of immunocompromised individuals, P. aeruginosa typically infects the pulmonary tract, urinary tract, burns, wounds, and also causes other blood infections[6]. It is the most common cause of infections of burn injuries and of the external ear (otitis externa), and the most frequent colonizer of medical devices (e.g., catheters). Pseudomonas can, in rare circumstances, cause community-acquired pneumonias, as well as ventilator-associated pneumonias, being one of the most common agent isolated in several studies[7],[8]. One of the most worrisome characteristics of P. aeruginosa is its low antibiotic susceptibility. This low susceptibility is attributable to a concerted action of multidrug efflux pumps with chromosomally encoded antibiotic resistance genes and the low permeability of the bacterial cellular envelopes. In addition to this intrinsic resistance, P. aeruginosa easily develops acquired resistance either by mutation in chromosomally encoded genes or by the horizontal gene transfers of antibiotic resistance determinants.

Therefore, the present study was performed to focus on the time dependent amikacin resistant P. aeruginosa infection induced toxicity in murine peritoneal macrophages by the free radical generation and antioxidant enzymes status.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Chemicals and reagents

Phorbol mirested aceted (PMA), horse heart cytochrome-c, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 5′, 5′-dithio (bis)-2-nitrobenzoic acid (DTNB), standard reduced glutathione (GSH), were obtained from Sigma, USA. RPMI 1640, fetal bovine serum (FBS), heparin, ethylene diamine tetra acetate (EDTA), tryptic soy broth were purchased from Himedia, India. All other chemicals were from Merck Ltd., SRL Pvt., Ltd., Mumbai and were of the highest available analytical grade.

2.2. Bacterial strain

A pathogenic amikacin resistant P. aeruginosa (ARPA) was selected for this study. This strain was a gift from Dr. AmiyaKumar Hati, School of Tropical Medicine, Kolkata, India.

2.3. Isolation of the peritoneal macrophages and cell culture

Experiments were performed using Swiss male mice 6-8 weeks old, weighing 20-25 g. Animals were maintained in accordance with the guidelines of the National Institute of Nutrition, Indian Council of Medical Research, Hyderabad, India, and approved by the ethical committee of Vidyasagar University. All efforts were made to minimize animal suffering and to reduce the number of animals used. Macrophages were isolated by peritoneal lavage from male Swiss mice, after 24 h injection of 2 mL of 4% starch according to our previous lab report[9]. In brief, the peritoneal lavage was performed by washing the peritoneal cavity with ice cold phosphate buffer saline (PBS) supplemented with 20 U/mL heparin and 1 mM EDTA. Care was taken not to cause internal bleeding while collecting macrophages in the exudates. The cells were then cultured in 60 mm petridishes in RPMI-1640 media supplemented with 10% FBS, 50 µg/mL gentamycin, 50 µg/mL penicillin and 50 µg/mL streptomycin for 24 h at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air / 5% CO2 atmosphere in CO2 incubator. Non-adherent cells were removed by vigorously washing three times with ice-cold PBS. Differential counts of the adherent cells used for the experiments were determined microscopically after staining with Giemsa and the cell viability evaluated by trypan blue exclusion was never below 95%[9][11].

2.4. Preparation of bacterial suspension

This bacterial strain was grown at 37 °C overnight in tryptic soy broth. The bacterial culture was centrifuged at 15 000 rpm for 15 min. The pallet was resuspended and washed with PBS. Using a UV-spectrophotometer (Schimadzu, USA) at an absorbance of 620 nm, the viable bacterial count was adjusted to approximately 1.0 × 109 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL, which corresponded to an optical density of 1.6. The bacterial suspension was adjusted by serial dilution in PBS to final concentration of approximately 1 × 108 in 100 µL of bacterial suspension[12].

2.5. Experimental design and sample preparation

The peritoneal macrophages were divided into 6 groups for six different duration dependent experiments as follows: Group I: 1 h; Group II: 2 h; Group III: 3 h; Group IV: 6 h; Group V: 12 h and Group VI: 24 h. Each group was divided into two sub-groups, one was control and the other was for 1×108 CFU/mL ARPA treatment. Each sub-group contained 6 petridishes (4 × 106 cells in each). The cells of each petridishes were maintained in RPMI 1640 media supplemented with 10% FBS, 50 µg/mL gentamycin, 50 µg/mL penicillin and 50 µg/mL streptomycin at 37 °C in a 95% air / 5% CO2 atmosphere in CO2 incubator. The concentration of ARPA was selected according to Kannan et al[13]. After the treatment schedule the cells were collected from the petridishes separately and centrifuged at 2 200 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. Then the supernatant was collected in separate micro centrifuge tube and the cells were washed twice with 50 mM PBS, pH 7.4. The pallets were lysed with hypotonic lysis buffer (10 mM TRIS, 1 mM EDTA and Titron X-100, pH 8.0) for 45 min at 37 °C and then processed for the biochemical estimation[14]. Intact cells were used for superoxide anion generation.

2.6. Biochemical estimation

2.6.1. Assessment of superoxide anion (O2) generation

O2 generation was determined by a standard assay[15]. Briefly, 0.1 µg/mL of PMA (Sigma), a potent macrophage stimulant, and 0.12 mM horse heart cytochrome-c (Sigma) were added to isolated cell suspensions after treatment schedule, and washing with PBS. Cytochrome-c reduction by generated superoxide was then determined by spectrophotometric absorbance at a 550 nm wavelength. Results are expressed as n mol of cytochrome-c reduced/min, using extinction-coefficient 2.1 × 104 M−1 cm−1.

2.6.2. Nitric oxide (NO) generation

NO generation in cell lysate was assessed according to Sanai et al[16], with slight modification. Sodium nitroprusside (100 mM), in phosphate-buffered saline, was mixed with 200 µL sample and incubated at room temperature for 150 min. After that, Griess reagent (0.5 mL) (containing 1% sulfanilamide in 5% phosphoric acid and 0.1% N-C-1 napthyl ethylene diamine dihydrochloride in 1:1 ratio) was added and incubated at room temperature for 10 min. The absorbance of the chromophore formed was read at 550 nm with a double beam Hitachi U2001 UV/Visible spectrophotometer (USA). NO generation was calculated using the sodium nitrite standard curve and expressed as µ mol/mg protein.

2.6.3. Determination of reduced glutathione (GSH) level

Reduced GSH estimation in the cell lysate was performed by the method of Moron et al[17]. The required amount of the cell lysate was mixed with 25% of trichloroacetic acid and centrifuged at 2 000 rpm for 15 min to settle the precipitated proteins. The supernatant was aspirated and diluted to 1 mL with 0.2 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 8.0). Later, 2 mL of 0.6 mM DTNB was added. After 10 min the optical density of the yellow-colored complex formed by the reaction of GSH and DTNB (Ellman's reagent) was measured at 405 nm. A standard curve was obtained with standard reduced glutathione. The levels of GSH were expressed as µg of GSH/mg protein.

2.6.4. Activity of super oxide dismutase (SOD)

SOD activity was determined from its ability to inhibit the auto-oxidation of pyrogalol according to Mestro Del and McDonald[18]. The reaction mixture consisted of 50 mM Tris (hydroxymethyl) amino methane (pH 8.2), 1 mM diethylenetriamine penta acetic acid, and 20-50 µL of cell lysate. The reaction was initiated by addition of 0.2 mM pyrogalol, and the absorbance measured kinetically at 420 nm at 25 °C for 3 min. SOD activity was expressed as unit/mg protein.

2.6.5. Activity of catalase (CAT)

CAT activity in the cell lysate was measured by the method of Luck[19]. The final 3mL of reaction mixture contained 0.05 M Tris-buffer, 5 mM EDTA (pH 7.0), and 10 mM H2O2 (in 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0). About 50 µL aliquot of the cell lysates were added to the above mixture. The rate of change of absorbance per min at 240 nm was recorded. CAT activity was calculated by using the molar extinction coefficient of 43.6 M−1 cm−1 for H2O2. The level of CAT was expressed in terms of µ mol H2O2 consumed/min/mg protein.

2.6.7. Protein estimation

Protein was determined according to Lowry et al[20] using bovine serum albumin as standard.

2.7. Statistical analysis

The data were expressed as mean±SEM, n=6. Comparisons between the means of control and ARPA transfected group of each time interval were made by one-way ANOVA test (using a statistical package, Origin 6.1, Northampton, MA 01060 USA) with student's t-tests, P<0.05 as a limit of significance.

3. Results

3.1. Superoxide radical production

Production of superoxide anion in peritoneal macrophages after P. aeroginosa transfection was presented in Figure 1. Significant increases (P<0.05) in superoxide anion production, as indicated by reduction of cytochrome-c, were observed relative to control levels at all respective duration time of 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h. These increases were time-dependent, being first significantly observed at 2 h compared with controls and the degree of elevation was highest after 12 h of transfection.

Figure 1. Superoxide anion generation (O2) in peritoneal macrophages of control and ARPA treated group.

Figure 1.

Values are expressed as mean±SEM, n=6. * Significant difference (P<0.05) in ARPA treated group compared with control group at respective time interval.

3.2. NO generation

NO production by murine peritoneal macrophages from different time intervals was presented in Figure 2. Nitric oxide production was found to increase from 63.373% to 166.927% in ARPA transfected macrophages at different time intervals with respect to control group. NO production significantly increasesed (P<0.05) by 62.373%, 77.187%, 103.333%, 117.227%, 166.927% and 128.592% in ARPA transfected macrophages with 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 6 h, 12 h and 24 h after transfection, respectively.

Figure 2. Nitrate (NO) generation in peritoneal macrophages of control and ARPA treated group.

Figure 2.

Values are expressed as mean±SEM, n=6. * Significant difference (P<0.05) in ARPA treated group compared with control group at respective time interval.

3.3. Reduced glutathione level

Reduced glutathione level was decreased at all respective duration of time (1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h). Significant decreased (P<0.05) of reduced glutathione (GSH) levels were observed at 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h of transfection. GSH levels were decreased due to transfection of P. aeroginosa to peritoneal macrophages compared with control (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Reduced glutathione (GSH) level in peritoneal macrophages of control and ARPA treated group.

Figure 3.

Values are expressed as mean±SEM, n=6. * Significant difference (P<0.05) in ARPA treated group compared with control group at respective time interval.

3.4. Superoxide Dismutase (SOD) Activity

The results regarding the antioxidant enzymes, i.e. activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) in peritoneal macrophage of control and experimental groups, were shown in Figure 4. SOD activities were decreased by 11.446%, 15.129%, 24.939%, 45.101%, 53.229% and 46.913% compared with control after transfection with P. aeroginosa according to time after infection at 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h, respectively. The alteration of SOD activities in macrophages with 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h was more or less the same and statistical analysis revealed that there was highly significant difference (P<0.05).

Figure 4. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in peritoneal macrophages of control and ARPA treated group.

Figure 4.

Values are expressed as mean±SEM, n=6. * Significant difference (P<0.05) in ARPA treated group compared with control group at respective time interval.

3.5. Catalase (CAT) activity

The results regarding the antioxidant enzymes, i.e. activities of catalase (CAT) in peritoneal macrophage of control and experimental groups, were shown in Figure 5. CAT activities were decreased by 9.080%, 16.705%, 21.549%, 40.865%, 53.543% and 39.056% compared with control after transfection of P. aeroginosa according to time after infection at 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h, respectively. The alteration of CAT activities in macrophages with 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h was more or less the same and statistical analysis revealed that there was significant difference (P<0.05).

Figure 5. Catalase (CAT) activity in peritoneal macrophages of control and ARPA treated group.

Figure 5.

Values are expressed as mean±SEM, n=6. * Significant difference (P<0.05) in ARPA treated group compared with control group at respective time interval.

4. Discussion

Phagocytic cell such as macrophage are the first line of defense system of the organism against the infectious agents. Macrophages accomplish non-specific immune function through phagocytosis. Phagocytic function can be divided into several stages including chemotaxis, ingestion and killing of infectious agent by production of superoxide anion radical and reactive oxygen species (ROS). ROS can cause cellular injury and death through damaging of biologically important macromolecules[21],[22].

In the present study, we have examined some of the cellular activities of murine peritoneal macrophages of ARPA transfected group. It was evident from our study that superoxide anion and NO generation were significantly increased (P<0.05) in a time dependent fashion, whereas glutathione level and antioxidant enzymes status such as SOD and CAT activities were significantly decreased (P<0.05), with all these parameters giving a maximal effect at 12 h of ARPA transfection.

Oxidative stress is the result of an imbalance between the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the antioxidant enzyme system resisting the former. Macrophage, the immune cell, uses ROS to carry out many of its function. It needs appropriate levels of intracellular antioxidants to eliminate the harmful effect of oxidative stress[23],[24]. In present study, the superoxide radical generation increased in ARPA transfected macrophages at different time intervals. This may be due to the increased activation of NADPH oxidase. The activated NADPH oxidase transports electrons from NADH on the cytoplasmic site of the membrane to oxygen in the extracellular fluid to form O2 and leads to the oxidative damage of macro molecules including lipid and protein, and less activity of antioxidant enzymes.

NO itself has potent antimicrobial activity and can also combine with superoxide anion to yield even more potent antimicrobial substance[25]. In the present study, it was found that NO generation was significantly increased in ARPA transfected macrophage as compared with control group. The effect was maximal at 12 h after transfection.

Glutathione, an important cellular reluctant, is involved in protection against free radical, peroxides and toxic compounds in cellular systems[26]. In the present study, the GSH level was decreased along with the time intervals and the maximum decrease occurred at 12 h after transfection. The decreased GSH levels represent its increased utilization with the increasing time. This decreasd GSH level may be due to the increasing level of lipid oxidation products which may be associated with less availability of NADPH.Therefore, it is required for activity of Glutathione reductase (GR) to transform from GSSG to GSH[27].

Antioxidant enzymes are considered to be a primary defense that prevents biological macromolecules from oxidative damage. Aerobic cells contain various amounts of two main antioxidant enzymes, i.e., superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT). SOD rapidly dismutates superoxide anion (O2) to less dangerous H2O2 which is further degraded by CAT and Glutathione peroxide (GPx) to water and oxygen[25].

The result of the present study showed a fall in SOD level with the increasing time and the maximum decrease occurred at 12 h after transfection. The depletion of SOD activity may be due to the reason that it has disposed off the free radicals produced by ARPA transfection. Macrophages are important physiological source of superoxide anion, which were dismutate to H2O2 by SOD[28]. Where the SOD stops its action, there the catalase exerts its actions. The primary role of CAT is to scavenge H2O2 that has been generated by free radical or by SOD in removal of superoxide anions and to convert it to water and oxygen[29],[30]. In our present study, the decreased catalase activity may be related to excess H2O2 production from ARPA transfection or SOD inhibition[31][34].

In summary, the present study has clearly established that ARPA can time dependently increase the superoxide anion and nitrate generation and meanwhile decrease the glutathione level and antioxidant enzymes status in murine peritoneal macrophage.

Acknowledgments

The authors express gratefulness to the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India for funding and Vidyasagar University, Midnapore for providing the facilities to execute these studies.

Footnotes

Foundation Project: Supported from a grant by Department of Biotechnology, India (NO: BT/PR10861/NNT/28/131/2008).

Conflict of interest statement: We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Unanue ER. Macrophages, antigen-presenting cells, and the phenomena of antigen handling and presentation. In: Paul WE, editor. Fundamental immunology. New York: Raven Press; 1989. pp. 95–115. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Abbas AK, Lichtman AH. Cellular and molecular immunology. New York: Elsevier Science; 2008. Effector mechanism of cell mediated immunity; p. 312. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Das D, Saha SS, Bishayi B. Intracellular survival of Staphylococcus aureus: correlating production of catalase and superoxide dismutase with levels of inflammatory cytokines. Inflamm Res. 2008;57:340–349. doi: 10.1007/s00011-007-7206-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ryan KJ, Ray CG. 4th ed. New York: McGraw Hill Medical; 2004. Sherris medical microbiology. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Anzai K, Kim H, Park JY, Wakabayashi H, Oyaizu H. Phylogenetic affiliation of the Pseudomonads based on 16S rRNA sequence. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2000;50:1563–1589. doi: 10.1099/00207713-50-4-1563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Itah AY, Essien JP. Growth profile and hydrocarbonoclastic potential of microorganisms isolated from tarballs in the bight of Bonny, Nigeria. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2005;21:1317–1322. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Alexis AF, Lamb A. Concomitant therapy for acne in patients with skin of color: a case-based approach. Dermatol Nurs. 2009;21(1):33–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nakatsuji T, Kao MC, Fang JY, Zouboulis CC, Zhang L, Gallo RL, et al. et al. Antimicrobial property of lauric acid against Propionibacterium acnes: its therapeutic potential for inflammatory acne vulgaris. J Invest Dermatol. 2009;129(10):2480–2488. doi: 10.1038/jid.2009.93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mahapatra SK, Das S, Bhattacharjee S, Gautam N, Majumdar S, Roy S. In vitro nicotine-induced oxidative stress in mice peritoneal macrophages: a dose-dependent approach. Toxicol Mech Methods. 2009;19:100–108. doi: 10.1080/15376510802255184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Azuma Y, Ohura K. Comparison of the effect of lidocaineepinephrine and prilocainefelypressine to alter macrophage functions. Int Immunopharmacol. 2001;1:911–923. doi: 10.1016/s1567-5769(01)00027-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Oliveros LB, Videla AM, Gimenez MS. Effect of dietary fat saturation on lipid metabolism, arachidonic acid turnover and peritoneal macrophage oxidative stress in mice. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2004;37:311–320. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2004000300004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gresham HD, Lowrance JH, Caver TE, Wilson BS, Cheung AL, Lindberg FP. Survival of Staphylococcus aureus inside neutrophils contributes to infection. J Immunol. 2000;164:3713–3722. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.7.3713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kannan S, Audet A, Huang H, Chen L, Wu M. Cholesterol-rich membrane rafts and lyn are involved in phagocytosis during Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. J Immunol. 2008;180:2396–2408. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.4.2396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sandhu SK, Kaur G. Alterations in oxidative stress scavenger system in aging rat brain and lymphocytes. Biogerontology. 2002;3:161–173. doi: 10.1023/a:1015643107449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.KarMahapatra S, Chakraborty SP, Roy S. Aqueous extract of Ocimum gratissimum Linn and ascorbic acid ameliorate nicotine-induced cellular damage in murine peritoneal macrophages. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2010;10:775–782. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sasaki S, Miura T, Nishikawa S, Yamada K, Hirasue M, Nakane A. Protective role of nitric oxide in Staphylococcus aurues infection in mice. Infect Immun. 1998;66:1017–1022. doi: 10.1128/iai.66.3.1017-1022.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Moron MS, Kepierre JW, Mannervick B. Levels of glutathione reductase and glutathione- S-transferase activities in rat lung and liver. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1979;582:67–68. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(79)90289-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mestro Del RF, McDonald W. Oxidative enzymes in tissue homogenates. In: Greenwald RA, editor. CRC handbook of methods for oxygen radical research. Boca Raton FL: CRC Press; 1986. pp. 291–296. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Luck H. Catalase. In: Bergmeyer HW, editor. Methods of enzymatic analysis. New York: Academic Press; 1963. pp. 885–894. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the folin-phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951;193:265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mahapatra SK, Chakraborty SP, Majumdar S, Bag BG, Roy S. Eugenol protects nicotine-induced superoxide mediated oxidative damage in murine peritoneal macrophages in vitro. Eur J Pharmacol. 2009;623:132–140. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.09.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chakraborty SP, Kar Mahapatra S, Sahu SK, Pramanik P, Roy S. Antioxidative effect of folate-modified chitosan nanoparticles. Asian Paci J Trop Biomed. 2010;1(1):29–38. doi: 10.1016/S2221-1691(11)60064-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Victor VM, De la Fuente M. Comparative study of peritoneal macrophages function in mice receiving lethal doses of LPS. J Endotoxin Res. 2002;9:236–243. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mahapatra SK, Chakraborty SP, Das S, Roy S. Methanol extract of Ocimum gratissimum protects murine peritoneal macrophages from nicotine toxicity by decreasing free radical generation, lipid and protein damage, and enhances antioxidant protection. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2009;2(4):222–230. doi: 10.4161/oxim.2.4.9000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 25.Chakraborty SP, Kar Mahapatra S, Sahu SK, Chattopadhyay S, Pramanik P, Roy S. Nitric oxide mediated Staphylococcus aureus pathogenesis and protective role of nanoconjugated vancomycin. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2010;1(2):105–112. doi: 10.1016/S2221-1691(11)60005-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gerster H. β-carotene, vitamin E and vitamin C in different stages of experimental carcinogenesis. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1995;49:155–168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sarkar S, Yadav P, Trivedi R, Bansal AK, Bhatnagar D. Cadmium-induced lipid peroxidation and the status of the antioxidant system in rat tissues. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 1995;9:144–149. doi: 10.1016/S0946-672X(11)80038-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Das S, Kar Mahapatra S, Gautam N, Das A, Roy S. Oxidative stress in lymphocytes, neutrophils and serum of oral cavity cancer patients: modulatory array of L-glutamine. Support Care Cancer. 2007;15:1399–1405. doi: 10.1007/s00520-007-0266-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Das S, Neogy S, Gautam N, Roy S. In vitro nicotine induced superoxide mediated DNA fragmentation in lymphocytes: protective role of Andrographis paniculata Nees. Toxicol In Vitro. 2009;23:90–98. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2008.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bannister JV, Bannister WH, Rotilio G. Aspects of the structure, function and application of superoxide dismutase. CRC Crit Rev Biochem. 1987;22:111–180. doi: 10.3109/10409238709083738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Husain K, Scott BR, Reddy SK, Somani SM. Chronic ethanol and nicotine interaction on rat tissue antioxidant defense system. Alcohol. 2001;25:89–97. doi: 10.1016/s0741-8329(01)00176-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Erukainure OL, Ajiboye JA, Adejobi RO, Okafor OY, Adenekan SO. Protective effect of pineapple (Ananas cosmosus) peel extract on alcohol-induced oxidative stress in brain tissues of male albino rats. Asian Pac J Trop Dis. 2011;1(1):5–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Thirumalai, Therasa sv, Elumalai ek, David E. Intense and exhaustive exercise induce oxidative stress in skeletal muscle. Asian Pac J Trop Dis. 2011;1(1):63–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Husain K, Scott BR, Reddy SK, Somani SM. Chronic ethanol and nicotine interaction on rat tissue antioxidant defense system. Alcohol. 2001;25:89–97. doi: 10.1016/s0741-8329(01)00176-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine are provided here courtesy of China Humanity Technology Publishing House

RESOURCES