Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2013 Apr 2;8(4):e60646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060646

Evidence of New Risk Genetic Factor to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: The UBASH3A Gene

Lina-Marcela Diaz-Gallo 1,*, Elena Sánchez 1, Norberto Ortego-Centeno 2, Jose Mario Sabio 3, Francisco J García-Hernández 4, Enrique de Ramón 5, Miguel A González-Gay 6, Torsten Witte 7, Hans-Joachim Anders 8, María F González-Escribano 9, Javier Martin 1
Editor: Xiao-Ping Miao10
PMCID: PMC3614928  PMID: 23565265

Abstract

The ubiquitin associated and Src-homology 3 (SH3) domain containing A (UBASH3a) is a suppressor of T-cell receptor signaling, underscoring antigen presentation to T-cells as a critical shared mechanism of diseases pathogenesis. The aim of the present study was to determine whether the UBASH3a gene influence the susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in Caucasian populations. We evaluated five UBASH3a polymorphisms (rs2277798, rs2277800, rs9976767, rs13048049 and rs17114930), using TaqMan® allelic discrimination assays, in a discovery cohort that included 906 SLE patients and 1165 healthy controls from Spain. The SNPs that exhibit statistical significance difference were evaluated in a German replication cohort of 360 SLE patients and 379 healthy controls. The case-control analysis in the Spanish population showed a significant association between the rs9976767 and SLE (Pc = 9.9E-03 OR = 1.21 95%CI = 1.07–1.37) and a trend of association for the rs2277798 analysis (P = 0.09 OR = 0.9 95%CI = 0.79–1.02). The replication in a German cohort and the meta-analysis confirmed that the rs9976767 (Pc = 0.02; Pc = 2.4E-04, for German cohort and meta-analysis, respectively) and rs2277798 (Pc = 0.013; Pc = 4.7E-03, for German cohort and meta-analysis, respectively) UBASH3a variants are susceptibility factors for SLE. Finally, a conditional regression analysis suggested that the most likely genetic variation responsible for the association was the rs9976767 polymorphism. Our results suggest that UBASH3a gene plays a role in the susceptibility to SLE. Moreover, our study indicates that UBASH3a can be considered as a common genetic factor in autoimmune diseases.

Introduction

The T cell ubiquitin ligand proteins (TULA) family is characterized by function as suppressors of T cell receptor signalling. One of the members of the TULA family proteins is the ubiquitin associated and Src-homology 3 (SH3) domain containing A (UBASH3a) which is expressed only in lymphoid cells and facilitates apoptosis induced in T cells by certain stimuli, such as growth factor withdrawal [1]. UBASH3a gene spans 40 kb, contains 15 exons and is located on human chromosome 21q22.3 [2]. The lack of TULA proteins resulted in hyper-reactivity of T cells [1]. Evidence for both B and T lymphocyte hyper-reactivity is typically observed in autoimmune disorders [2]. These disorders are characterized by an inappropriate, ultimately excessive, inflammatory response against self, resulting in tissue destruction. Although many individuals affected by autoimmune diseases demonstrate multiorgan involvement, the primary end-organ target (e.g., autoimmune destruction of pancreatic islet cells in type 1 diabetes mellitus) typically drives the clinical presentation and disease definition. Recent studies have showed that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the UBASH3a gene are associated with some autoimmune diseases, like type 1 diabetes (T1D), celiac disease (CD), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and vitiligo, suggesting that this gene could play an important role in the pathogenesis of autoimmune disorders [3][8].

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a prototypic autoimmune diseases characterized by the production of autoantibodies, immune-complex deposition, and subsequent multiple organ damage. The complex aetiology of autoimmune diseases includes environmental, hormonal and genetic factors. Some of those factors remained to be defined [3], [4]. Based on these insights, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of five UBASH3a polymorphism in SLE.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from all participants and the respectively ethics committee approved the study according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki.

The case-control study included 906 SLE patients and 1165 healthy controls from a white Spanish population. The replication cohort from white Germans comprehends 360 SLE patients and 379 healthy controls. All the patients met the American College of Rheumatology criteria for classification of SLE [5]. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants and the respectively ethics committee approved the study. DNA was obtained from peripheral blood using standard methods. The samples were genotyped for the UBASH3a rs2277798, rs2277800, rs9976767, rs13048049 and rs17114930 polymorphisms via TaqMan® 5′allelic discrimination technology using a predesigned SNPs genotyping assays provided by Applied Biosystems (assay ID: C___1724055_10, C__15885522_20, C___1724067_10, C___1724073_20 and C___25622591_10, respectively; Figure S1). At the moment of the design of the study the only confirmed case-control associated SNP with autoimmune diseases was the rs9976767 [6]. The other four SNPs were selected because they were not included in previous SLE genetic studies and they are non-synonymous changes located in different exons of the UBASH3a gene. Moreover, the minor allele frequency (MAF) of those SNPs was reported in Caucasian populations and they exhibited moderated LD with at least one SNP in the loci. Deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was tested by standard chi-square analysis. The differences in genotype distribution and allele frequency among cases and controls were calculated by contingency tables and when necessary by Fisher's exact test. Odds ratios (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI), were calculated according to Woolf's method. Combined data were analysed by Mantel-Haenszel tests under fixed effect model and the Breslow-Day (BD) test was used to estimate the OR heterogeneity amongst the two cohorts. An association was considered statistically significant if P<0.05. Benjamini & Hochberg (1995) step-up false discovery rate (FDR) control correction [7] for multiple testing was applied to the P-values in both the independent analysis and the combined meta-analysis (Pc). Linkage disequilibrium (LD) measurement (r2) between the studied SNPs was estimated by expectation-maximization algorithm using HAPLOVIEW (version 4.2; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard). Finally, the dependency of the association between each SNP and every studied genetic variant was determined by a conditional logistic regression analysis (considering the different cohorts as covariate). The analyses were performed using PLINK (version 1.07) [8].

Results

The distributions of genotypic and allelic frequencies of the five UABSH3a evaluated polymorphisms were in HWE at 5% significance level. Additionally, MAFs of the studied SNPs were similar to those reported by the HapMap project for the CEU population (http://hapmap.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) in both, Spanish and German cohorts. The LD structure of the five UABSH3a SNPs in the Spanish cohort is shown in (Figure S1). The Table 1 summarizes the results of the association analysis for the discovery cohort. The minor allele of the rs9976767 polymorphism exhibited a statistical significant association with SLE in the Spanish population (Pc = 9.9E-03, OR = 1.21, 95%CI = 1.07–1.37). In addition we observed a trend of association with the rs2277798 polymorphism (P = 0.099, Pc = 0.248, OR = 0.9, 95%CI = 0.79–1.02). The frequency of the minor alleles of the rs2277800, rs13048049 and rs17114930 UBASH3a polymorphisms were not statistically significantly different between SLE patients and healthy controls in the Spanish cohort.

Table 1. Genotype and minor allele frequencies of UBASH3a SNPs located in Caucasian SLE patients and healthy controls from Spain, the discovery cohort.

Genotype, N (%) Alleles, N(%) Allele test
SNP 1/2 Subgroup (N) 1/1 1/2 2/2 1 2 P -value * OR [CI 95%]****
rs2277798 G/A Controls (n = 1165) 477 (40.94) 529 (45.41) 159 (13.65) 1483 (63.6) 847 (36.4)
SLE (n = 906) 402 (44.37) 394 (43.49) 110 (12.14) 1198 (66.1) 614 (33.9) 0.0993** 0.90 [0.79-1.02]
rs2277800 C/T Controls (n = 1165) 1080 (92.70) 84 (7.21) 1 (0.09) 2244 (96.3) 86 (3.7)
SLE (n = 906) 832 (91.83) 73 (8.06) 1 (0.11) 1737 (95.9) 75 (4.1) 0.4592 1.13 [0.82–1.55]
rs9976767 A/G Controls (n = 1165) 363 (31.16) 558 (47.90) 244 (20.94) 1284 (55.1) 1046 (44.9)
SLE (n = 906) 230 (25.39) 451 (49.78) 225 (24.83) 911 (503) 901 (49.7) 1.99E-03*** 1.21 [1.07–1.37]
rs13048049 G/A Controls (n = 1165) 1038 (89.10) 126 (10.82) 1 (0.09) 2202 (94.5) 128 (5.5)
SLE (n = 906) 808 (89.18) 96 (10.60) 2 (0.22) 1712 (94.5) 100 (5.5) 0.9719 1.01 [0.77–1.32]
rs17114930 C/G Controls (n = 1165) 1066 (91.50) 95 (8.15) 4 (0.34) 2227 (95.6) 103 (4.4)
SLE (n = 906) 811 (89.51) 93 (10.26) 2 (0.22) 1715 (94.6) 97 (5.4) 0.1649 1.22 [0.92–1.63]
*

All P-values have been calculated for the allelic model. ** Pc = 0.248 Benjamini & Hochberg (1995). ***Pc = 9.9E-03 Benjamini & Hochberg (1995) step-up FDR control. ****Odds ratio for the minor allele.

Based on these observations, we evaluated the frequency of the rs9976767 and rs2277798 in a replication cohort from Germany (Table 2). Genotypic and allelic frequencies of both polymorphisms were in HWE. The frequency of the minor allele of both SNPs: rs9976767 and rs2277798 were statistically significant different between SLE patients and healthy controls: rs9976767 (Pc =  0.02, OR = 1.28 95%CI = 1.04–1.57) and rs227798 (Pc = 0.01, OR = 0.75, 95%CI = 0.6–0.92). Lastly, we combine both the Spanish and German cohorts through a meta-analysis in order to increase the statistical power and to determine the combine OR (Table 3 and Figure 1). This analysis showed evidence of association of the minor allele of rs9976767 with higher SLE risk (Pc = 4.7E-03, OR = 1.23 95%CI = 1.11–1.37) and the rs2277798 with lower risk to SLE (Pc = 2.4–04, OR = 0.85, 95%CI = 0.76–0.95).

Table 2. Genotype and minor allele frequencies of UBASH3a SNPs located in Caucasian SLE patients and healthy controls from Germany.

Genotype, N (%) Alleles, N(%) Allele test
SNP ½ Subgroup (N) 1/1 1/2 2/2 1 2 P-value* P FR** OR [CI 95%]***
rs2277798 G/A Controls (n = 379) 184 (48.55) 132 (34.83) 63 (16.62) 448 (59.1) 310 (40.9)
SLE(n = 360) 149 (41.39) 163 (45.28) 48 (13.33) 475 (66) 245 (34) 0.0064 0,0128 0.75 [0.60–0.92]
rs9976767 A/G Controls (n = 379) 186 (49.08) 136 (35.88) 57 (15.04) 458 (60.4) 300 (39.4)
SSc (n = 360) 180 (50.00) 106 (29.44) 74 (20.56) 392 (54.4) 328 (45.6) 0.0201 0,0201 1.28 [1.04–1.57]
*

All P-values have been calculated for the allelic model. ** Benjamini & Hochberg (1995) step-up FDR control. ***Odds ratio for the minor allele.

Table 3. Meta-analysis of two UBASH3a genetic variants within Spanish and German SLE populations.

Genotype, N (%) Alleles, N(%) Allele test
SNP ½ Subgroup (N) 1/1 1/2 2/2 1 2 P -value * P FDR** OR [CI 95%]***
rs2277798 G/A Controls (n = 1544) 609 (39.44) 713 (46.18) 222 (14.38) 1931 (62.5) 1157 (37.5)
SLE (n = 1266) 565 (44.63) 543 (42.89) 158 (12.48) 1673 (66.1) 859 (33.9) 0.0047 4.7E-03 0.85 [0.76–0.95]
rs9976767 A/G Controls (n = 1544) 499 (32.32) 744 (48.19) 301 (19.49) 1742 (56.4) 13446 (43.6)
SLE (n = 1266) 336 (26.54) 631 (49.84) 299 (23.62) 1303 (51.5) 1229 (48.5) 1.2E-04 2,4E-04 1.23 [1.11–1.37]
*

All P-values have been calculated for the allelic model. **Benjamini & Hochberg (1995) step-up FDR control. ***Odds ratio for the minor allele.

Figure 1. Graphical representation of the meta-analysis (A) Forest plot for the meta-analysis of the UBASH3a rs2277798 polymorphism in SLE in two Caucasian cohorts.

Figure 1

(B) Forest plot for the meta-analysis of the UBASH3a rs9976767 polymorphism in SLE in two Caucasian cohorts.

Finally, we prompted out to evaluate whether one of both polymorphisms is responsible for the associations detected using a logistic regression analysis. Pair-wise conditional analysis showed that the association of the rs2277798 SNP was explained by the rs9976767effect, because only the coefficient for the test of rs9976767 remained significant (model conditioned by rs2277798P = 0.76; model conditioned by rs9976767 P = 9E-03, Table 4).

Table 4. Conditional logistic regression analysis for two UBASH3a SNPs located in SLE considering the two European populations as covariate.

Group of analysis SNP MAF Cases MAF Controls p Value: add to rs9976767 rs9976767 p value: add to SNP r2 with rs9976767
Spain Germany
SLE
rs2277798 0.34 0.38 0.758 0.0087 0.45 0.41

Discussion

UBASH3a is implicated in the regulation of tyrosine phosphorylation levels within T cells and is involved in facilitates the apoptosis induced in these cells. UBASH3a binds to the apoptosis-inducing protein AIF, which has previously been shown to function as a key factor of caspase-independent apoptosis [9]. It has also been reported that SLE T cells, compared with control T cells, undergo an increased rate of apoptosis, which contribute to SLE pathogenesis [4]. Changes in the UBASH3a structure or expression levels can affect the binding with AIF leading to an alteration in the apoptosis level.

Herein, we described for the first time the influence of five UBASH3a genetic variants in SLE susceptibility. Interestingly, the rs9976767 polymorphism is located in the intronic region between the exons 5 and 6 while the other four studied SNPs (rs2277798, rs2277800, rs13048049 and rs17114930) are non-synonymous changes located in three different exons. The intronic regions flanking constitutive exons contain potential splicing regulatory sequences. Moreover, a study restricted to analysis of the canonical splice signals reported that 15% of point mutations disrupted splicing, a likely gross underestimate of the impact of splicing on human disease [10]. This suggests that the rs9976767 polymorphism could be affecting the expression of different UBASH3a isoforms consequently affecting the binding to AIF. Concerning to this we checked if there is any relation between the rs9976767 and expression of UBASH3a gene using expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) databases. Interesting, there is a significant statistical correlation between the increase of UBASH3a expression in lymphoblastoid cell lines and the homozygotes for the minor allele of rs9976767 (rho = 0.483, P = 1.3E-05; Figure S2A) in one of the two groups of twins studied (this observation was done using Genevar 3.2.0 software) [11], [12]. Furthermore the eQTL studies in asthma showed that the SNPs (rs9784215, rs3746923, rs2277797) with highest LOD score (LOD>4.5, P<1E-05) in the UBAHS3a locus are in moderate to high LD with rs9976767 (Figure S2B and C; this observation was done using mRNA by SNP Browser 1.0.1 http://www.sph.umich.edu/csg/liang/asthma/) [13], [14]. This evidence suggested that rs9976767 could have a functional role in the regulation of the expression of UBASH3a. However, and according with HapMap project (http://hapmap.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), this SNP tags other six variants in this region (rs7278547, rs11702374, rs9976479, rs3746924, rs3761378, rs7283281; r2>0.95) and considering the present study and the previous GWAS [15], [16] we have studied approximately 15% of the genetic variation of UBASH3a locus. In order to cover all the genetic variation of this gene, it is necessary to genotype 181 SNPs (calculated through an aggressive tagging with 2-marker haplotypes in Haploview 4.2 software using CEPH population from HapMap project). All these together suggest that the rs9976767 is a good functional candidate risk factor to SLE, but it could be more than one variant related to SLE.

No previous reports have associated the rs9976767 UBASH3a polymorphism with SLE. Nevertheless, it is worth noting that the rs9976767 SNP or its six tags variants were not included in previous genome wide association studies (GWAS) in Caucasian SLE cohorts [15], [16]. Although the statistical power is 96% for our meta-analysis (calculate using a p value = 0.05∶OR = 1.2∶ MAF = 0.4), the results found in our study should be replicated in different Caucasian cohorts and other populations. Furthermore there is a need to determine whether the statistical associations are related with the involvement of UBASH3a in the pathogenesis of SLE and other autoimmune diseases. Regarding to this, the UBASH3a gene seems to be a common genetic factor in autoimmune diseases because different polymorphism of this locus has been associated with autoimmune diseases like T1D, CD, RA and vitiligo [6], [17][21]. Our results showed that the minor allele of the rs9976767 UBASH3a polymorphism is a risk factor to SLE, as similarly observed with T1D [6]. Nevertheless, there is no evidence of association between this variant and other autoimmune diseases. This can be linked with the suggestion that common genetic factors in autoimmune diseases could match a regional level but differ in the specific genetic variant associated to each disease, like the associations observed with IL2IL21 and MHC loci [22]. Based on the concept of quantitative thresholds for immune-cell signalling, the effect of the rs976767 UBAHS3a variant could diversely affect the range of values for the stimulus-response selection of the immune cells in different autoimmune pathologies, making it more or less relevant in different diseases [3].

In conclusion, our study showed the first evidence of association of the UBASH3a gene with the genetic background of SLE. Together the functional role of the protein encoded by this gene, the reported data in the eQTLs databases and our results point to the UBASH3a gene as a new element in the pathogenic mechanism of autoimmune diseases.

Supporting Information

Figure S1

Pattern of linkage disequilibrium of the five studied SNPs and their location in the UBAHS3a gene. The values correspond to r2 calculated for the Spanish cohort. The rs2277798 polymorphism [G/A] is located in exon 1 of UBASH3a gene. It's a no-synonymous change in the position 18 of the protein (S[Ser]/G[Gly]). The rs2277800 polymorphism [C/T] is also located in exon 1 of UBASH3a gene and generate a change in the position 28 of the protein (L[Leu]/F[Phe]). In the other hand, the rs9976767 [A/G] is an intronic variant located between the exons 5 and 6 of the UBASH3a gene. Both variants rs13048049 [G/A] and rs17114930 [C/G] are no-synonymous changes in exons 7 and 11, respectively. The first one produce a change from arginine (R[Arg]) to glutamine (Q[Gln]) in position 286; while the rs17114930 polymorphism generates a change from aspartic acid (D[Asp]) to glutamic acid (E[Glu]) in position 428 in Caucasian population.

(TIF)

Figure S2

Results observed using different expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) tools to evaluate if there is any relationship between the rs9976767 variant and the UBASH3a expression (A) SNP-gene association plot for the rs9976767 and the UBASH3a gene based on Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rho) using the Genevar 3.2 software (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/resources/software/genevar/) [1]. The eQTL analysis was performed in lymphoblastoid cell lines from peripheral blood sample (n =  74). The plot corresponds to one of the two twins groups studied [2]. (B) Linkage disequilibrium (LD) plot performed in Haploview 4.2 [3]. LD plot between rs9976767 and the rs9784215, rs3746923, rs2277797 SNPs which exhibited the highest LOD score (LOD>4.5, P<1E-05) in the UBAHS3a locus showed in (C) Snapshot of observed eQTLs related with UBASH3a gene from the mRNA by SNP Browser 1.0.1 software (http://www.sph.umich.edu/csg/liang/asthma/) based on eQTL studies in asthma [4], [5]. The LOD scores and P values for those SNPs are: rs9784215, LOD = 4.909 P = 2E-06; rs3746923, LOD = 4.905 P = 2E-06; rs2277797, LOD = 4.68 P = 3.4E-06. They are signalled as red dots in the LOD plot. 1. Yang TP, Beazley C, Montgomery SB, Dimas AS, Gutierrez-Arcelus M, et al. (2010) Genevar: a database and Java application for the analysis and visualization of SNP-gene associations in eQTL studies. Bioinformatics 26: 2474-2476. 2. Nica AC, Parts L, Glass D, Nisbet J, Barrett A, et al. (2011) The architecture of gene regulatory variation across multiple human tissues: the MuTHER study. PLoS Genet 7: e1002003. 3. Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ (2005) Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics 21: 263-265. 4. Dixon AL, Liang L, Moffatt MF, Chen W, Heath S, et al. (2007) A genome-wide association study of global gene expression. Nat Genet 39: 1202-1207. 5. Moffatt MF, Kabesch M, Liang L, Dixon AL, Strachan D, et al. (2007) Genetic variants regulating ORMDL3 expression contribute to the risk of childhood asthma. Nature 448: 470-473.

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We thank to GemaRobledo, Sofía Vargas and Sonia Garcia for their excellent technical assistance. we thank to all donors, patients and controls. We thank BancoNacional de ADN (University of Salamanca, Spain) who supplied part of the control DNA samples.

Funding Statement

This work was partially supported by RETICS Program, RD08/0075 (RIER) from Instituto de Salud Carlos III, within the VI PN de I+D+i 2008-2011 (FEDER) and grant KFO 250, TP 03, WI 1031/6-1 LMDG was supported by the “Ayudas Predoctorales de Formación en Investigación en Salud (PFIS - FI09/00544)” from the “Instituto de Salud Carlos III”. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Tsygankov AY (2009) TULA-family proteins: an odd couple. Cell Mol Life Sci 66: 2949–2952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Zenewicz LA, Abraham C, Flavell RA, Cho JH (2010) Unraveling the genetics of autoimmunity. Cell 140: 791–797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cho JH, Gregersen PK (2011) Genomics and the multifactorial nature of human autoimmune disease.N Engl J Med. 2011/10/28 ed. 1612-1623. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 4. Guerra SG, Vyse TJ, Cunninghame Graham DS (2012) The genetics of lupus: a functional perspective. Arthritis Res Ther 14: 211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Hochberg MC (1997) Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 40: 1725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Grant SF, Qu HQ, Bradfield JP, Marchand L, Kim CE, et al. (2009) Follow-up analysis of genome-wide association data identifies novel loci for type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 58: 290–295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Benjamini Y HY (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Statist Soc B 57: 289–300. [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, et al. (2007) PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet 81: 559–575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Collingwood TS, Smirnova EV, Bogush M, Carpino N, Annan RS, et al. (2007) T-cell ubiquitin ligand affects cell death through a functional interaction with apoptosis-inducing factor, a key factor of caspase-independent apoptosis. J Biol Chem 282: 30920–30928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Yeo GW, Van Nostrand EL, Liang TY (2007) Discovery and analysis of evolutionarily conserved intronic splicing regulatory elements. PLoS Genet 3: e85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Nica AC, Parts L, Glass D, Nisbet J, Barrett A, et al. (2011) The architecture of gene regulatory variation across multiple human tissues: the MuTHER study. PLoS Genet 7: e1002003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Yang TP, Beazley C, Montgomery SB, Dimas AS, Gutierrez-Arcelus M, et al. (2010) Genevar: a database and Java application for the analysis and visualization of SNP-gene associations in eQTL studies. Bioinformatics 26: 2474–2476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Dixon AL, Liang L, Moffatt MF, Chen W, Heath S, et al. (2007) A genome-wide association study of global gene expression. Nat Genet 39: 1202–1207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Moffatt MF, Kabesch M, Liang L, Dixon AL, Strachan D, et al. (2007) Genetic variants regulating ORMDL3 expression contribute to the risk of childhood asthma. Nature 448: 470–473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Harley JB, Alarcon-Riquelme ME, Criswell LA, Jacob CO, Kimberly RP, et al. (2008) Genome-wide association scan in women with systemic lupus erythematosus identifies susceptibility variants in ITGAM, PXK, KIAA1542 and other loci. Nat Genet 40: 204–210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Kozyrev SV, Abelson AK, Wojcik J, Zaghlool A, Linga Reddy MV, et al. (2008) Functional variants in the B-cell gene BANK1 are associated with systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Genet 40: 211–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Concannon P, Onengut-Gumuscu S, Todd JA, Smyth DJ, Pociot F, et al. (2008) A human type 1 diabetes susceptibility locus maps to chromosome 21q22.3. Diabetes 57: 2858–2861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Jin Y, Birlea SA, Fain PR, Gowan K, Riccardi SL, et al. (2010) Variant of TYR and autoimmunity susceptibility loci in generalized vitiligo. N Engl J Med 362: 1686–1697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Smyth DJ, Plagnol V, Walker NM, Cooper JD, Downes K, et al. (2008) Shared and distinct genetic variants in type 1 diabetes and celiac disease. N Engl J Med 359: 2767–2777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Stahl EA, Raychaudhuri S, Remmers EF, Xie G, Eyre S, et al. (2010) Genome-wide association study meta-analysis identifies seven new rheumatoid arthritis risk loci. Nat Genet 42: 508–514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Zhernakova A, Stahl EA, Trynka G, Raychaudhuri S, Festen EA, et al. (2011) Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies in celiac disease and rheumatoid arthritis identifies fourteen non-HLA shared loci. PLoS Genet 7: e1002004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Diaz-Gallo LM, Martin J (2012) Common genes in autoimmune diseases: a link between immune-mediated diseases. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 8: 107–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1

Pattern of linkage disequilibrium of the five studied SNPs and their location in the UBAHS3a gene. The values correspond to r2 calculated for the Spanish cohort. The rs2277798 polymorphism [G/A] is located in exon 1 of UBASH3a gene. It's a no-synonymous change in the position 18 of the protein (S[Ser]/G[Gly]). The rs2277800 polymorphism [C/T] is also located in exon 1 of UBASH3a gene and generate a change in the position 28 of the protein (L[Leu]/F[Phe]). In the other hand, the rs9976767 [A/G] is an intronic variant located between the exons 5 and 6 of the UBASH3a gene. Both variants rs13048049 [G/A] and rs17114930 [C/G] are no-synonymous changes in exons 7 and 11, respectively. The first one produce a change from arginine (R[Arg]) to glutamine (Q[Gln]) in position 286; while the rs17114930 polymorphism generates a change from aspartic acid (D[Asp]) to glutamic acid (E[Glu]) in position 428 in Caucasian population.

(TIF)

Figure S2

Results observed using different expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) tools to evaluate if there is any relationship between the rs9976767 variant and the UBASH3a expression (A) SNP-gene association plot for the rs9976767 and the UBASH3a gene based on Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rho) using the Genevar 3.2 software (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/resources/software/genevar/) [1]. The eQTL analysis was performed in lymphoblastoid cell lines from peripheral blood sample (n =  74). The plot corresponds to one of the two twins groups studied [2]. (B) Linkage disequilibrium (LD) plot performed in Haploview 4.2 [3]. LD plot between rs9976767 and the rs9784215, rs3746923, rs2277797 SNPs which exhibited the highest LOD score (LOD>4.5, P<1E-05) in the UBAHS3a locus showed in (C) Snapshot of observed eQTLs related with UBASH3a gene from the mRNA by SNP Browser 1.0.1 software (http://www.sph.umich.edu/csg/liang/asthma/) based on eQTL studies in asthma [4], [5]. The LOD scores and P values for those SNPs are: rs9784215, LOD = 4.909 P = 2E-06; rs3746923, LOD = 4.905 P = 2E-06; rs2277797, LOD = 4.68 P = 3.4E-06. They are signalled as red dots in the LOD plot. 1. Yang TP, Beazley C, Montgomery SB, Dimas AS, Gutierrez-Arcelus M, et al. (2010) Genevar: a database and Java application for the analysis and visualization of SNP-gene associations in eQTL studies. Bioinformatics 26: 2474-2476. 2. Nica AC, Parts L, Glass D, Nisbet J, Barrett A, et al. (2011) The architecture of gene regulatory variation across multiple human tissues: the MuTHER study. PLoS Genet 7: e1002003. 3. Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ (2005) Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics 21: 263-265. 4. Dixon AL, Liang L, Moffatt MF, Chen W, Heath S, et al. (2007) A genome-wide association study of global gene expression. Nat Genet 39: 1202-1207. 5. Moffatt MF, Kabesch M, Liang L, Dixon AL, Strachan D, et al. (2007) Genetic variants regulating ORMDL3 expression contribute to the risk of childhood asthma. Nature 448: 470-473.

(TIF)


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES