Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Pharm. 2013 Mar 1;10(4):1400–1408. doi: 10.1021/mp3006984

Design and Evaluation of New Tc-99m-Labeled Lactam Bridge-Cyclized Alpha-MSH Peptides for Melanoma Imaging

Haixun Guo , Fabio Gallazzi §, Yubin Miao †,⊥,φ,*
PMCID: PMC3615551  NIHMSID: NIHMS448330  PMID: 23418722

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the melanoma targeting and imaging properties of new 99mTc-labeled lactam bridge-cyclized alpha-melanocyte stimulating hormone (α-MSH) peptides using bifunctional chelating agents. MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex, AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex and HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex peptides were synthesized and their melanocortin-1 (MC1) receptor binding affinities were determined in B16/F1 melanoma cells. The biodistribution of 99mTc-MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex, 99mTc-AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex, 99mTc(CO)3-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex and 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex were determined in B16/F1 melanoma-bearing C57 mice at 2 h post-injection to select a lead peptide for further evaluation. The melanoma targeting and imaging properties of 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex were further examined because of its high melanoma uptake and fast urinary clearance. The IC50 values of MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex, AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex and HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex were 1.0 ± 0.05, 1.2 ± 0.19 and 0.6 ± 0.04 nM in B16/F1 melanoma cells, respectively. Among these four 99mTc-peptides, 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex exhibited the highest melanoma uptake (14.14 ± 4.90% ID/g) and fastest urinary clearance (91.26 ± 1.96% ID) at 2 h post-injection. 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex showed high tumor to normal organ uptake ratios except for the kidneys. The tumor/kidney uptake ratios of 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex were 2.50 and 3.55 at 4 and 24 h post-injection. The melanoma lesions were clearly visualized by SPECT/CT using 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex as an imaging probe at 2 h post-injection. Overall, high melanoma uptake coupled with fast urinary clearance of 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex highlighted its potential for metastatic melanoma detection in the future.

Keywords: Alpha-melanocyte stimulating hormone, 99mTc-labeled lactam bridge-cyclized peptide, melanoma SPECT imaging

INTRODUCTION

Skin cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in the United States. Approximately 3.5 millions skin cancers are diagnosed annually. Among the three major types of skin cancer (basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and melanoma), melanoma is the most deadly skin cancer with an increasing incidence rate.1 Although melanoma only accounts for less than 5% of skin cancer cases, it results in greater than 75% of deaths from skin cancer. The cancer st11atistics from American Cancer Society predicted that 9,180 deaths of melanoma would occur in the United States in 2012.1 Unfortunately, no curative treatment is available for metastatic melanoma. Early diagnosis followed by a prompt surgical removal offers patients the best opportunities for cures or prolonged survivals. Thus, it has been of great interest to develop receptor-targeting peptide radiopharmaceuticals for melanoma imaging and therapy.219

We and others have reported radiolabeled lactam bridge-cyclized α-MSH peptides targeting melanocotin-1 (MC1) receptors for melanoma imaging over the past a few years.2029 We have developed two generations of α-MSH peptides cyclized either via a Lys-Asp or an Asp-Lys lactam bridge. The first-generation peptides were built on the backbone of CycMSH peptide {c[Lys-Nle-Glu-His-DPhe-Arg-Trp-Gly-Arg-Pro-Val-Asp}], whereas the second-generation peptides were designed based upon the construct of CycMSHhex peptide {c[Asp-His-DPhe-Arg-Trp-Lys]-CONH2}. DOTA (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid) was attached to the CycMSH and CycMSHhex peptides for 111In labeling. Compared to the first-generation 111In-labeled CycMSH peptides, the second-generation 111In-labeled CycMSHhex peptides exhibited enhanced melanoma uptake and decreased renal uptake.2025 Among the 111In-labeled CycMSHhex peptides, we identified 111In-DOTA-GGNle-CycMSHhex as a lead peptide because of its high melanoma uptake (19.05 ± 5.04 % ID/g at 2 h post-injection) and relatively low renal uptake (6.84 ± 0.92 % ID/g at 2 h post-injection) in B16/F1 melanoma-bearing C57 mice.25 The melanoma lesions could be clearly visualized by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) using 111In-DOTA-GGNle-CycMSHhex as an imaging probe.25

Despite the success of 111In-DOTA-GGNle-CycMSHhex for melanoma imaging, we managed to develop new 99mTc-labeled CycMSHhex peptides for melanoma imaging due to the wide utilization of 99mTc as a diagnostic radionuclide in nuclear medicine. Technetium-99m is an ideal SPECT radionuclide because of its 140-keV γ-photon emission and a manageable 6 h half-life. Meanwhile, 99mTc is very cost-effective and can be easily obtained from a commercial 99Mo-99mTc generator. High melanoma uptake of 111In-DOTA-GGNle-CycMSHhex underscored it as a lead peptide construct. Thus, we managed to develop new 99mTc-labeled GGNle-CycMSHhex peptides using different 99mTc chelators for melanoma imaging in this study. Mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG3) and Ac-Cys-Gly-Gly-Gly (AcCG3) are N3S chelators for 99mTc, whereas hydrazinonicotinamide (HYNIC) can form 99mTc complexes via either an IsoLink carbonyl labeling agent or Ethylenediaminediacetic acid (EDDA)/Tricine solution. Therefore, we replaced the DOTA chelator with three different bifunctional chelating agents, namely MAG3, AcCG3 and HYNIC, to generate new MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex, AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex and HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex peptides to examine which chelating agent was the best in retaining favorable melanoma targeting and pharmacokinetic properties. We determined their MC1 receptor binding affinities in B16/F1 melanoma cells first. Then, we examined the biodistribution of 99mTc-MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex, 99mTc-AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex, 99mTc(CO)3-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex and 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex at 2 h post-injection to select a lead 99mTc-peptide for further evaluation. 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex displayed the highest melanoma uptake and fastest urinary clearance. Therefore, we further determined the biodistribution of 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex and its property for molecular imaging in B16/F1 melanoma-bearing C57 mice in this study.

EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Chemicals and Reagents

Amino acids and resin were purchased from Advanced ChemTech Inc. (Louisville, KY) and Novabiochem (San Diego, CA). Boc-HYNIC was purchased from VWR International, Inc. (Albuquerque, NM). 125I-Tyr2-[Nle4, D-Phe7]-α-MSH {125I-(Tyr2)-NDP-MSH} was obtained from PerkinElmer, Inc. (Waltham, MA) for receptor binding assays. 99mTcO4 was purchased from Cardinal Health (Albuquerque, NM) for peptide radiolabeling. All other chemicals used in this study were purchased from Thermo Fischer Scientific (Waltham, MA) and used without further purification. B16/F1 murine melanoma cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA).

Peptide Synthesis and Receptor Binding Assay

MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex, AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex and HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex were synthesized using fluorenylmethyloxy carbonyl (Fmoc) chemistry, purified by reverse phase-high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) and characterized by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Generally, 70 μmol of resin, 210 μmol of each Fmoc-protected amino acid and 210 μmol of Boc-HYNIC were used for the synthesis. Briefly, the intermediate scaffolds of Mercaptoacetyl(Trt)-Gly-Gly-Gly-Gly-Gly-Nle-Asp(O-2-PhiPr)-His(Trt)-DPhe-Arg(Pbf)-Trp(Boc)-Lys(Dde), A c-Cys-Gly-Gly-Gly-Gly-Gly-Nle-Asp(O-2-PhiPr)-His(Trt)-DPhe-Arg(Pbf)-Trp(Boc)-Lys(Dde) and HYNIC(Boc)-Gly-Gly-Nle-Asp(O-2-PhiPr)-His(Trt)-DPhe-Arg(Pbf)-Trp(Boc)-Lys(Dde) were synthesized on H2N-Sieber amide resin using an Advanced ChemTech multiple-peptide synthesizer (Louisville, KY). The protecting group of Dde was removed by 2% hydrazine for peptide cyclization. The protecting group of 2-phenylisopropyl was removed and the protected peptide was cleaved from the resin by treating with a mixture of 2.5% of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) and 5% of triisopropylsilane. Each protected peptide was cyclized by coupling the carboxylic group from the Asp with the epsilon amino group from the Lys. The cyclization reaction was achieved by an overnight reaction in N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) using benzotriazole-1-yl-oxy-tris-pyrrolidino-phosphonium-hexafluorophosphate (PyBOP) as a coupling agent in the presence of N,N-diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA). Each protected cyclic peptide was dissolved in H2O/CH3CN (50:50) and lyophilized to remove the reagents. The protecting groups were totally removed by treating with a mixture of TFA, thioanisole, phenol, water, ethanedithiol and triisopropylsilane (87.5:2.5:2.5:2.5:2.5:2.5) for 2 h at room temperature (25 °C). Each peptide was precipitated and washed with ice-cold ether four times, purified by RP-HPLC and characterized by LC-MS. The MC1 receptor binding affinities (IC50 values) of MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex, AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex and HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex were determined in B16/F1 melanoma cells by in vitro competitive receptor binding assays according to our published procedure.25 The study was carried out in triplicate, the final IC50 value was calculated by averaging two experiments.

Peptide Radiolabeling with 99mTc

99mTc-MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex and 99mTc-AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex were prepared according to the published procedure30 with modifications. Briefly, 10 μL of 1 mg/mL MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex or AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex aqueous solution, 10 μL of pH 9.2 tartrate buffer (50 μg/μL Na2tartrate·2H2O, 0.5 M Na2HCO3, 0.25 M NH4OAc, 0.175 M NH3), 3 μL of freshly prepared tin chloride solution (10 μg/μL SnCl2·2H2O, 1 μg/μL sodium ascorbate, 10 mM HCl), and 50 μL of 99mTcO4 solution (37–74 MBq) were added into a reaction vial and incubated at 100 °C for 20 min. Each radiolabeled peptide was purified to a single species by Waters RP-HPLC (Milford, MA) on a Grace Vydac C-18 reverse phase analytical column (Deerfield, IL) using a 20-min gradient of 22–32% acetonitrile in 20 mM HCl aqueous solution at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The mobile phase consisted of solvent A (20 mM HCl aqueous solution) and solvent B (100% CH3CN). The gradient was initiated and kept at 78:22 A/B for 3 min followed by a linear gradient of 78:22 A/B to 68:32 A/B over 20 min. Then, the gradient was changed from 68:32 A/B to 10:90 A/B over 3 min followed by an additional 5 min at 10:90 A/B. Thereafter, the gradient was changed from 10:90 A/B to 78:22 A/B over 3 min. Each purified peptide was purged with N2 gas for 20 min to remove the acetonitrile. The pH of the final solution was adjusted to 5 with 0.1 N NaOH and normal saline for animal studies.

99mTc(CO)3-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex was prepared using an IsoLink carbonyl labeling agent (DRN4335; Mallinckrodt). First, 1 mL of 99mTcO4 (185 MBq) solution was added into an IsoLink kit and incubated at 100°C for 20 min to yield [99mTc(CO)3(OH2)3]+. Second, 200 μL of the [99mTc(CO)3(OH2)3]+ preparation and 10 μL of 1 mg/mL HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex aqueous solution were added into 200 μL of 0.5 M NH4OAc buffer (pH 5.44) in a reaction vial and incubated at 75°C for 30 min. The radiolabeled peptide was purified to a single species by Waters RP-HPLC on a Grace Vydac C-18 reverse phase analytical column using a 20-min gradient of 24–34% acetonitrile in 20 mM HCl aqueous solution at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The purified peptide was purged with N2 gas for 20 min to remove the acetonitrile. The pH of the final solution was adjusted to 5 with 0.1 N NaOH and normal saline for animal studies.

99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex was prepared according to the published procedure31 with modifications. Briefly, 50 μL of 99mTcO4 (37–74 MBq), 10 μL of 1 mg/mL SnCl2 in 0.1 N HCl solution, 200 μL of a mixture of 5 mg/mL of EDDA and 25 mg/mL of Tricine aqueous solution and 10 μL of 1 mg/mL HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex aqueous solution were added into 400 μL of 0.5 M NH4OAc (pH 5.44) in a reaction vial and incubated at 95°C for 30 min. The radiolabeled peptide was purified to a single species using a Waters RP-HPLC on a Grace Vydac C-18 reverse phase analytical column using a 20-min gradient of 18–28% acetonitrile in 20 mM HCl aqueous solution at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The purified peptide was purged with N2 gas for 20 min to remove the acetonitrile. The pH of the final solution was adjusted to 5 with 0.1 N NaOH and normal saline for animal studies.

Biodistribution Studies

All animal studies were conducted in compliance with Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approval. In an attempt to select a lead 99mTc-peptide for further evaluation, the biodistribution of 99mTc-MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex, 99mTc-AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex, 99mTc(CO)3-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex and 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex were examined in B16/F1 melanoma-bearing C57 female mice (Harlan, Indianapolis, IN) at 2 h post-injection, respectively. The C57 mice were subcutaneously inoculated with 1×106 B16/F1 cells on the right flank for each mouse to generate B16/F1 tumors. The weights of tumors reached approximately 0.2 g 10 days post cell inoculation. Each melanoma-bearing mouse was injected with 0.037 MBq of 99mTc-MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex, 99mTc-AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex, 99mTc(CO)3-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex or 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex via the tail vein. Groups of 5 mice were sacrificed at 2 h post-injection, tumor and organs of interest were harvested, weighed and counted in a Wallace 1480 automated gamma counter (PerkinElmer). Meanwhile, intestines and urine were collected and counted to evaluate the clearance pathway of each 99mTc-labeled peptide. Blood was taken as 6.5% of the body weight.

99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex displayed higher melanoma uptake and faster urinary clearance than the other three 99mTc-peptides. Therefore, its biodistribution properties were further determined in B16/F1 melanoma-bearing C57 female mice at 0.5, 4 and 24 h post-injection. The B16/F1 melanoma-bearing mice were generated as described above. Each melanoma-bearing mouse was injected with 0.037 MBq of 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex via the tail vein. Groups of 5 mice were sacrificed at 0.5, 4 and 24 h post-injection, and tumors and organs of interest were harvested, weighed and counted. Blood was taken as 6.5% of the body weight. The tumor uptake specificity of 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex was determined by co-injecting 10 μg (6.07 nmol) of unlabeled NDP-MSH peptide at 2 h post-injection. To examine whether L-lysine co-injection could decrease the renal uptake, a group of 5 mice was injected with a mixture of 12 mg of L-lysine and 0.037 MBq of 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex. The mice were sacrificed at 2 h post-injection and the tumors and organs of interest were harvested, weighed and counted.

Melanoma Imaging and Urinary Metabolites of 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex

Approximately 7.4 MBq of 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex was injected into a B16/F1 melanoma-bearing C57 mouse for melanoma imaging and urine metabolites analysis. The mouse was euthanized at 2 h post-injection for small animal SPECT/CT (Nano-SPECT/CT®, Bioscan) imaging, as well as to collect urine for analyzing the metabolites. The 9-min CT imaging was immediately followed by the whole-body SPECT scan. The SPECT scans of 24 projections were acquired. Reconstructed SPECT and CT data were visualized and co-registered using InVivoScope (Bioscan, Washington DC). The collected urine sample was centrifuged at 16,000 g for 5 min before the HPLC analysis. Thereafter, aliquots of the urine were injected into the HPLC. A 20-minute gradient of 18–28% acetonitrile/20 mM HCl with a flow rate of 1 mL/min was used for urine analysis.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the Student’s t-test for unpaired data. A 95% confidence level was chosen to determine the significance of difference in tumor and renal uptake of 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex with/without NDP-MSH co-injection, as well as the significance of difference in tumor and renal uptake of 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex with/without L-lysine co-injection in the biodistribution studies described above. The differences at the 95% confidence level (p<0.05) were considered significant.

RESULTS

New MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex, AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex and HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex were synthesized and purified by RP-HPLC. The overall synthetic yields were 25–30% for MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex, AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex and HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex. All three peptides displayed greater than 90% purity after HPLC purification. The identities of MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex, AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex and HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex were confirmed by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. The calculated and measured molecular weights of MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex, AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex and HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex are presented in Table 1. The measured molecular weights matched the calculated molecular weights. The schematic structures of MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex, AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex and HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex are shown in Figure 1. The IC50 values of MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex, AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex and HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex were 1.0 ± 0.05, 1.2 ± 0.19 and 0.6 ± 0.04 nM in B16/F1 melanoma cells, respectively (Table 1).

Table 1.

IC50 values and molecular weights (MWs) of MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex, AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex and HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex.

Peptide IC50 (nM) Calculated MW Measured MW
MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex 1.0 ± 0.05 1340.6 1341.0
AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex 1.2 ± 0.19 1411.6 1412.1
HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex 0.6 ± 0.04 1231.0 1230.8

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematic structures of MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex (A), AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex (B) and HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex (C).

Both MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex and AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex were readily labeled with 99mTc with greater than 95% radiolabeling yields in tartrate buffer using SnCl2 as a reducing agent. 99mTc-MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex and 99mTc-AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex were completely separated from their excess non-labeled peptides by RP-HPLC. The retention times of 99mTc-MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex and 99mTc-AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex were 14.9 and 13.0 min, whereas the retention times of MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex and AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex were 12.0 and 12.0 min, respectively. Both 99mTc-MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex and 99mTc-AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex showed greater than 98% radiochemical purities after HPLC purification. HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex was radiolabeled with 99mTc either via an IsoLink carbonyl labeling agent or EDDA/Tricine solution with greater than 95% radiolabeling yields. 99mTc(CO)3-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex and 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex were completely separated from their excess non-labeled peptides by RP-HPLC. The retention times of 99mTc(CO)3-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex and 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex were 18.0 and 17.9 min, whereas the retention time of HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex was 15.5 min. Both 99mTc(CO)3-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex and 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex displayed greater than 98% radiochemical purities after HPLC purification.

The melanoma targeting and pharmacokinetic properties of 99mTc-MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex, 99mTc-AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex, 99mTc(CO)3-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex and 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex were determined in B16/F1 melanoma-bearing mice at 2 h post-injection to select a lead radiolabeled peptide for further evaluation. The biodistribution results of these four 99mTc-conjugates are shown in Table 2. Although 99mTc-MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex and 99mTc(CO)3-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex displayed substantial tumor uptake of 4.64 ± 1.06% ID/g and 5.84 ± 1.26% ID/g at 2 h post-injection, 99mTc(CO)3-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex showed higher liver uptake (38.11 ± 2.31 vs. 1.18 ± 0.15% ID/g) and renal uptake (17.69 ± 4.06 vs. 1.20 ± 0.51% ID/g) than 99mTc-MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex at 2 h post-injection. Meanwhile, 99mTc-AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex displayed improved melanoma uptake of 9.76 ± 0.51% ID/g coupled with low liver and renal uptake (1.69 ± 0.35 and 2.62 ± 0.45% ID/g, respectively) at 2 h post-injection. 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex exhibited the highest tumor uptake (14.14 ± 4.90% ID/g) among these four 99mTc-conjugates at 2 h post-injection in B16/F1 melanoma-bearing C57 mice. Interestingly, 99mTc(CO)3-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex showed the highest renal and liver uptake, as well as the highest accumulation in blood, heart, lung, spleen, stomach, bone and skin at 2 h post-injection among these four 99mTc-conjugates. Compared to 99mTc(CO)3-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex, both 99mTc-MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex and 99mTc-AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex displayed much lower normal organ accumulation at 2 h post-injection. The uptake of 99mTc-MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex or 99mTc-AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex was lower than 3.4% ID/g in stomach, liver and kidneys at 2 h post-injection. However, only 27.53 ± 6.99% ID of 99mTc-MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex and 38.20 ± 3.98% ID of 99mTc-AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex were excreted through the urinary system, while 55.02 ± 10.44% ID of 99mTc-MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex and 50.91 ± 2.72% ID of 99mTc-AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex were excreted through the GI system. On the other hand, 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex exhibited the highest tumor uptake (14.14 ± 4.90% ID/g) and the fastest urinary clearance (91.26 ± 1.96% ID) at 2 h post-injection. Thus, we selected 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex as a lead peptide to further examine its full biodistribution and melanoma imaging properties.

Table 2.

Biodistribution comparison among 99mTc-MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex {MAG3}, 99mTc-AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex {AcCG3}, 99mTc(CO)3-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex {(CO)3} and 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex {EDDA} in B16/F1 melanoma-bearing C57 mice at 2 h post-injection. The data were presented as percent injected dose/gram or as percent injected dose (Mean ± SD, n=5)

Tissues MAG3 AcCG3 (CO)3 EDDA
Percent injected dose/gram (%ID/g)
Tumor 4.64±1.06 9.76±0.51 5.84±1.26 14.14±4.90
Brain 0.05±0.05 0.04±0.03 0.12±0.02 0.05±0.04
Blood 0.25±0.13 0.27±0.13 2.17±1.91 0.17±0.05
Heart 0.33±0.13 0.27±0.14 1.94±0.22 0.09±0.03
Lung 0.46±0.10 0.47±0.09 4.42±1.62 0.41±0.06
Liver 1.18±0.15 1.69±0.35 38.11±2.31 0.52±0.05
Spleen 0.30±0.12 0.35±0.10 4.70±1.13 0.18±0.08
Stomach 3.38±0.78 2.86±1.80 4.01±1.78 1.02±0.31
Kidneys 1.20±0.51 2.62±0.45 17.69±4.06 7.52±0.96
Muscle 0.08±0.02 0.12±0.09 0.17±0.07 0.04±0.02
Pancreas 0.41±0.54 0.32±0.16 1.02±0.55 0.04±0.04
Bone 0.29±0.13 0.50±0.28 1.91±0.52 0.12±0.05
Skin 0.28±0.10 0.20±0.07 1.75±0.62 0.33±0.10

Percent injected dose (%ID)
Intestines 55.02±10.44 50.91±2.72 18.35±5.49 1.09±0.06
Urine 27.53±6.99 38.20±3.98 27.65±2.53 91.26±1.96

The full biodistribution results of 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex are presented in Table 3. 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex displayed high tumor uptake and prolonged tumor retention in B16/F1 melanoma-bearing C57 mice. The tumor uptake was 13.75 ± 3.49% ID/g at 30 min post-injection and reached its peak value of 14.14 ± 4.90% ID/g at 2 h post-injection. Compared with the tumor uptake at 2 h post-injection, 93.6% of the radioactivity remained in the tumor at 4 h post-injection. In the melanoma uptake blocking study, co-injection of NDP-MSH blocked 96.8% of the tumor uptake (p<0.05) at 2 h post-injection, demonstrating that the tumor uptake was MC1 receptor-medicated. Normal organ uptake of 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex was lower than 1.02% ID/g in normal tissues except for kidneys at 2, 4 and 24 h post-injection. High tumor/blood and high tumor/normal organ uptake ratios were achieved as early as 0.5 h post-injection. As the major excretion pathway of 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex, the kidney uptake was 11.21 ± 1.68% ID/g at 0.5 h post-injection and decreased to 1.28 ± 0.28% ID/g at 24 h post-injection. The tumor/kidney uptake ratios of 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex were 1.88, 2.50 and 3.55 at 2, 4 and 24 h post-injection. Co-injection of NDP-MSH didn’t reduce the renal uptake of the 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex activity at 2 h post-injection, indicating that the renal uptake was not MC1 receptor-mediated. Meanwhile, L-lysine co-injection decreased 42% of the renal uptake (p<0.05) without affecting the tumor uptake. Moreover, 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex exhibited rapid urinary excretion. Approximately 91% of the activity cleared out of the body at 2 h post-injection. The representative whole-body, coronal and transversal SPECT/CT images are presented in Figure 2. The melanoma lesions were clearly visualized by SPECT/CT using 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex as an imaging probe at 2 h post-injection. 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex exhibited high tumor to normal organ uptake ratios except for the kidneys, which was consistent with the biodistribution results. Urinary metabolites of 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex were analyzed by RP-HPLC 2 h post-injection. The radioactive HPLC profile of urine is illustrated in Figure 3. The urine analysis suggested that 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex remained intact in urine at 2 h post-injection.

Table 3.

Biodistribution of 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex in B16/F1 melanoma-bearing C57 mice. The data were presented as percent injected dose/gram or as percent injected dose (Mean ± SD, n=5)

Tissues 0.5 h 2 h# 4 h 24 h 2-h NDP blockade 2-h L-Lys co-injection
Percent injected dose/gram (%ID/g)
Tumor 13.75±3.49 14.14±4.90 13.23±2.35 4.54±0.70 0.45±0.29* 14.10±2.90
Brain 0.10±0.02 0.05±0.04 0.03±0.04 0.01±0.01 0.01±0.01 0.03±0.02
Blood 2.62±0.09 0.17±0.05 0.12±0.08 0.03±0.01 0.24±0.07 0.09±0.05
Heart 0.84±0.31 0.09±0.03 0.05±0.04 0.02±0.02 0.10±0.05 0.1±0.05
Lung 2.73±0.76 0.41±0.06 0.24±0.04 0.09±0.01 0.34±0.11 0.17±0.02
Liver 1.15±0.08 0.52±0.05 0.60±0.19 0.16±0.02 0.52±0.07 0.35±0.05
Spleen 0.99±0.10 0.18±0.08 0.20±0.18 0.05±0.03 0.13±0.09 0.09±0.06
Stomach 2.23±0.52 1.02±0.31 0.52±0.24 0.06±0.03 0.49±0.22 0.63±0.44
Kidneys 11.21±1.68 7.52±0.96 5.29±1.84 1.28±0.28 7.67±1.99 4.37±0.36*
Muscle 0.27±0.05 0.04±0.02 0.04±0.02 0.03±0.01 0.03±0.02 0.06±0.05
Pancreas 0.50±0.21 0.04±0.04 0.07±0.03 0.03±0.02 0.05±0.04 0.13±0.04
Bone 0.76±0.10 0.12±0.05 0.09±0.01 0.09±0.03 0.09±0.10 0.13±0.08
Skin 2.94±0.14 0.33±0.10 0.33±0.12 0.13±0.02 0.34±0.13 0.23±0.03

Percent injected dose (%ID)
Intestines 1.41±0.14 1.09±0.06 1.88±1.06 0.24±0.17 0.73±0.21 0.51±0.15
Urine 73.09±2.72 91.26±1.96 92.29±1.73 97.93±0.28 94.90±1.39 94.96±1.54

Uptake ratio of tumor/normal tissue
Tumor/liver 11.96 27.19 22.05 28.38 0.87 40.29
Tumor/kidney 1.23 1.88 2.50 3.55 0.06 3.23
Tumor/lung 5.03 34.49 55.13 50.44 1.32 82.94
Tumor/muscle 50.93 353.50 330.75 151.33 15.0 235.0
Tumor/blood 5.26 83.18 110.25 151.33 1.88 156.67
Tumor/skin 4.67 42.85 40.09 34.92 1.32 61.30
#

2 h Data were cited from Table 2 for comparison;

*

p<0.05 for determining the significance of differences in tumor and kidney uptake between 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex with or without NDP-MSH peptide blockade, as well as with or without L-lysine co-injection at 2 h post-injection.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Representative whole-body (A), coronal (B) and transversal (C) SPECT/CT images of 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex in a B16/F1 melanoma-bearing C57 mouse at 2 h post-injection. The tumor lesions (T) were highlighted with arrows on the images.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Radioactive HPLC profile of urine sample of a B16/F1 melanoma-bearing C57 mouse at 2 h post-injection of 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex. The arrow indicates the retention time (17.9 min) of the original compound of 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex prior to the tail vein injection.

DISCUSSION

It has been of interest to develop 99mTc-labeled α-MSH peptides targeting the MC1 receptors for melanoma imaging. Both linear and cyclic 99mTc-labeled α-MSH peptides were reported for melanoma targeting. Specifically, bifunctional chelator Ac-Cys-Gly-Cys-Gly- (for 99mTc radiolabeling) was coupled to the N-terminus of the linear NDP-MSH peptide to generate 99mTc-CGCG-NDPMSH.32 99mTc-CGCG-NDPMSH displayed 6.52 ± 1.11% ID/g of tumor uptake in B16/F1 melanoma-bearing C57 mice at 30 min post-injection. However, 99mTc-CGCG-NDPMSH showed a rapid tumor washout. The tumor uptake of 99mTc-CGCG-NDPMSH dramatically decreased to 0.56 ± 0.14% ID/g at 4 h post-injection. Meanwhile, 99mTc-CGCG-NDPMSH exhibited high liver uptake (6.80 ± 1.22 and 4.58 ± 1.02% ID/g) at 30 min and 1 h post-injection. Another bifunctional chelator MAG2 (tetrafluorophenyl mercaptoacetylglycylglycyl-gamma-aminobutyrate) was coupled to the epsilon amino group of Lys11 to yield 99mTc-MAG2-NDPMSH. Compared to 99mTc-CGCG-NDPMSH, 99mTc-MAG2-NDPMSH showed lower tumor uptake (4.17 ± 1.34 and 2.39 ± 1.21% ID/g at 30 min and 1 h post-injection) in B16/F1 melanoma-bearing C57 mice.32

It was an interesting approach to introduce three cycteines at the 3rd, 4th and 10th position of CCMSH peptide for preparing 99mTc-CCMSH. Three Cys3,4,10 sulfhydryls and one Cys4 amide nitrogen in the CCMSH peptide provided a site-specific chelator for complexing 99mTc.2,3,33 Importantly, 99mTc-CCMSH exhibited dramatically enhanced tumor uptake and prolonged tumor retention compared to 99mTc-CGCG-NDPMSH in B16/F1 melanoma-bearing C57 mice. The tumor uptake of 99mTc-CCMSH was 12.97 ± 1.38 and 11.64 ± 1.54% ID/g at 30 min and 1 h post-injection, respectively. The tumor uptake of 99mTc-CCMSH was 9.51 ± 1.97% ID/g at 4 h post-injection, which was 16.98 times the tumor uptake of 99mTc-CGCG-NDPMSH at 4 h post-injection.3,32 Furthermore, the substation of Lys11 with Arg11 generated 99mTc-(Arg11)CCMSH, which exhibited enhanced tumor uptake and dramatically reduced renal uptake in B16/F1 melanoma-bearing C57 mice.18 The tumor uptake of 99mTc-(Arg11)CCMSH was 1.21 and 1.17 times the tumor uptake of 99mTc-CCMSH at 1 and 4 h post-injection, whereas the renal uptake of 99mTc-(Arg11)CCMSH was only 59.2% and 37.9% of the renal uptake of 99mTc-CCMSH at 1 and 4 h post-injection.3,18 High tumor uptake and reduced renal uptake highlighted 99mTc-(Arg11)CCMSH as a lead metal-cyclized imaging probe for melanoma detection.

A lactam bridge-cyclized α-MSH peptide was radiolabeled with the 99mTc(CO)3 core to generate 99mTc(CO)3-pz-βAla-Nle-cyclo[Asp-His-DPhe-Arg-Trp-Lys]-NH2.26 Not surprisingly, 99mTc(CO)3-pz-βAla-Nle-cyclo[Asp-His-DPhe-Arg-Trp-Lys]-NH2 exhibited high tumor uptake and prolonged tumor retention. The tumor uptake of 99mTc(CO)3-pz-βAla-Nle-cyclo[Asp-His-DPhe-Arg-Trp-Lys]-NH2 was 9.26 ± 0.83 and 11.31 ± 1.83% ID/g at 1 h and 4 post-injection, respectively. Unfortunately, 99mTc(CO)3-pz-βAla-Nle-cyclo[Asp-His-DPhe-Arg-Trp-Lys]-NH2 showed extremely high renal and liver uptake at 1 and 4 h post-injection. The renal uptake of 99mTc(CO)3-pz-βAla-Nle-cyclo[Asp-His-DPhe-Arg-Trp-Lys]-NH2 was 71.06 ± 6.44% and 32.12 ± 1.57% ID/g at 1 and 4 h post-injection, whereas the liver uptake of 99mTc(CO)3-pz-βAla-Nle-cyclo[Asp-His-DPhe-Arg-Trp-Lys]-NH2 was 42.19 ± 5.05 and 22.86 ± 1.17% ID/g at 1 and 4 h post-injection.26

In this study, we developed new 99mTc-labeled lactam bridge-cyclized α-MSH peptides building upon the GGNle-CycMSHhex peptide construct we identified.25 Specifically, we coupled three bifunctional chelating agents, namely MAG3, AcCG3 and HYNIC, to GGNle-CycMSHhex to generate new MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex, AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex and HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex peptides. The coupling of MAG3, AcCG3 and HYNIC to GGNle-CycMSHhex retained low nanomolar MC1 receptor binding affinities of the peptides. The IC50 was 1.0 ± 0.05 nM for MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex, 1.2 ± 0.19 nM for AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex and 0.6 ± 0.04 nM HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex (Table 1), respectively. It is worthwhile to note that both MAG3 and AcCG3 provide N3S chelators for 99mTc conjugation, whereas the HYNIC chelator allows 99mTc conjugation via either the 99mTc(CO)3 or 99mTc(EDDA) core. Therefore, we prepared 99mTc-MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex, 99mTc-AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex, 99mTc(CO)3-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex and 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex conjugates in this study. Furthermore, we determined their biodistribution properties in B16/F1 melanoma-bearing C57 mice at 2 h post-injection to examine which bifunctional chelator was the best in retaining favorable melanoma targeting and pharmacokinetic properties. Despite the slight difference in receptor binding affinity among MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex, AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex and HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex, we observed dramatic differences in melanoma uptake, accumulation in non-target tissues, and excretion pathways among these four 99mTc-conjugates. As shown in Table 2, 99mTc-MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex and 99mTc(CO)3-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex showed substantial tumor uptake, whereas 99mTc-AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex displayed enhanced melanoma uptake. 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex exhibited the highest tumor uptake among these four 99mTc-peptides at 2 h post-injection in B16/F1 melanoma-bearing C57 mice. It was worthwhile to note that 99mTc(CO)3-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex exhibited high liver and renal uptake, as well as higher accumulation in the normal organs than the other three 99mTc-peptides at 2 h post-injection. It was likely that 99mTc was demetallated from the peptide in vivo. Obviously, the disadvantage associated with 99mTc-MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex and 99mTc-AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex was the accumulation in the GI system. Approximately 55.02 ± 10.44% ID of 99mTc-MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex and 50.91 ± 2.72% ID of 99mTc-AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex were excreted through the GI system. On the other hand, 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex exhibited the fastest urinary clearance (91.26 ± 1.96% ID) at 2 h post-injection. Thus, we further examined the full biodistribution and melanoma imaging properties of 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex.

As shown in Table 3, 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex displayed high tumor uptake and prolonged tumor retention in B16/F1 melanoma-bearing C57 mice. The tumor uptake reached its peak value of 14.14 ± 4.90% ID/g at 2 h post-injection, with 93.6% of the radioactivity remaining in tumor at 4 h post-injection. Co-injection of NDP-MSH blocked 96.8% of tumor uptake (p<0.05) without affecting the renal uptake at 2 h post-injection, demonstrating that the tumor uptake was MC1 receptor-medicated and the renal uptake was non-specific. Meanwhile, L-lysine co-injection decreased 42% of the renal uptake (p<0.05) without affecting the tumor uptake, indicating that the overall positive charge of the 99mTc-peptide contributed to the non-specific renal uptake. It was worthwhile to note that there was a positively-charged side chain in Arg8, which is critical for MC1 receptor binding. 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex exhibited low accumulation in normal organs and a rapid urinary excretion, resulting in high tumor to normal organ uptake ratios. As we anticipated, the B16/F1 melanoma lesions were clearly visualized by SPECT/CT using 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex as an imaging probe.

At the present time, 99mTc-(Arg11)CCMSH displayed more favorable melanoma targeting and pharmacokinetic properties than 99mTc(CO)3-pz-βAla-Nle-cyclo[Asp-His-DPhe-Arg-Trp-Lys]-NH2 and 99mTc-CGCG-NDPMSH. Although 99mTc(CO)3-pz-βAla-Nle-cyclo[Asp-His-DPhe-Arg-Trp-Lys]-NH2 showed similar high tumor uptake (11.31 ± 1.81% ID/g) with 99mTc-(Arg11)CCMSH, 99mTc(CO)3-pz-βAla-Nle-cyclo[Asp-His-DPhe-Arg-Trp-Lys]-NH2 displayed high accumulation and prolonged retention in both liver (22.86 ± 1.17% ID/g) and kidneys (32.12 ± 1.57% ID/g) at 4 h post-injection. High liver and renal uptake of 99mTc(CO)3-pz-βAla-Nle-cyclo[Asp-His-DPhe-Arg-Trp-Lys]-NH2 would limit its potential application in metastatic melanoma imaging. Remarkably, 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex exhibited comparably high melanoma uptake (13.23 ± 2.35% ID/g) to 99mTc-(Arg11)CCMSH at 4 h post-injection. Importantly, as shown in Figure 4, 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex displayed faster urinary clearance than 99mTc-(Arg11)CCMSH (92.3% ID vs. 83.8% ID) and much lower intestinal accumulation than 99mTc-(Arg11)CCMSH (1.9% ID vs. 11.5% ID) at 4 h post-injection. The differences in intestinal accumulation and urinary clearance were likely due to the structural differences between 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex and 99mTc-(Arg11)CCMSH.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Comparisons in tumor uptake (A), urine excretion (B) and intestine accumulation (C) at 4 h post-injection among 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex (blue), 99mTc-(Arg11)CCMSH (pink), 99mTc(CO)3-Pz-βAla-Nle-cyclo[Asp-His-DPhe-Arg-Trp-Lys]NH2 (green) and 99mTc-CGCG-NDPMSH (red). Data of 99mTc-(Arg11)CCMSH, 99mTc(CO)3-Pz-βAla-Nle-cyclo[Asp-His-DPhe-Arg-Trp-Lys]NH2 and 99mTc-CGCG-NDPMSH were cited from references 18, 26 and 32 for comparison.

In conclusion, the biodistribution of 99mTc-MAG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex, 99mTc-AcCG3-GGNle-CycMSHhex, 99mTc(CO)3-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex and 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex were determined in B16/F1 melanoma-bearing C57 mice in this study. Among these four 99mTc-peptides, 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex exhibited the highest melanoma uptake and fastest urinary clearance at 2 h post-injection. Overall, the properties of high melanoma uptake, low accumulation in intestines and fast urinary clearance of 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex highlighted its potential as an imaging probe for metastatic melanoma detection in the future.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Jianquan Yang for their technical assistance. This work was supported in part by the NIH grant NM-INBRE P20RR016480/P20GM103451 and University of New Mexico HSC RAC Award. The image in this article was generated by the Keck-UNM Small Animal Imaging Resource established with funding from the W.M. Keck Foundation and the University of New Mexico Cancer Research and Treatment Center (NIH P30 CA118100).

References

  • 1.Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60:277–300. doi: 10.3322/caac.20073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Giblin MF, Wang NN, Hoffman TJ, Jurisson SS, Quinn TP. Design and characterization of α-melanotropin peptide analogs cyclized through rhenium and technetium metal coordination. Proc Natl Acad Sci US A. 1998;95:12814–12818. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.22.12814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chen J, Cheng Z, Hoffman TJ, Jurisson SS, Quinn TP. Melanoma-targeting properties of 99mtechnetium-labeled cyclic alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone peptide analogues. Cancer Res. 2000;60:5649–5658. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chen J, Cheng Z, Owen NK, Hoffman TJ, Miao Y, Jurisson SS, Quinn TP. Evaluation of an 111In-DOTA-rhenium cyclized alpha-MSH analog: a novel cyclic-peptide analog with improved tumor-targeting properties. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:1847–1855. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Miao Y, Owen NK, Whitener D, Gallazzi F, Hoffman TJ, Quinn TP. In vivo evaluation of 188Re-labeled alpha-melanocyte stimulating hormone peptide analogs for melanoma therapy. Int J Cancer. 2002;101:480–487. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Froidevaux S, Calame-Christe M, Tanner H, Sumanovski L, Eberle AN. A novel DOTA-alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone analog for metastatic melanoma diagnosis. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:1699–1706. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cheng Z, Chen J, Miao Y, Owen NK, Quinn TP, Jurisson SS. Modification of the structure of a metallopeptide: synthesis and biological evaluation of 111In-labeled DOTA-conjugated rhenium-cyclized alpha-MSH analogues. J Med Chem. 2002;45:3048–3056. doi: 10.1021/jm010408m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Miao Y, Whitener D, Feng W, Owen NK, Chen J, Quinn TP. Evaluation of the human melanoma targeting properties of radiolabeled alpha-melanocyte stimulating hormone peptide analogues. Bioconjug Chem. 2003;14:1177–1184. doi: 10.1021/bc034069i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Froidevaux S, Calame-Christe M, Schuhmacher J, Tanner H, Saffrich R, Henze M, Eberle AN. A gallium-labeled DOTA-alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone analog for PET imaging of melanoma metastases. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:116–123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Miao Y, Owen NK, Fisher DR, Hoffman TJ, Quinn TP. Therapeutic efficacy of a 188Re-labeled alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone peptide analog in murine and human melanoma-bearing mouse models. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:121–129. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Froidevaux S, Calame-Christe M, Tanner H, Eberle AN. Melanoma targeting with DOTA-alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone analogs: structural parameters affecting tumor uptake and kidney uptake. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:887–895. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Miao Y, Hylarides M, Fisher DR, Shelton T, Moore H, Wester DW, Fritzberg AR, Winkelmann CT, Hoffman TJ, Quinn TP. Melanoma therapy via peptide-targeted alpha-radiation. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:5616–5621. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.McQuade P, Miao Y, Yoo J, Quinn TP, Welch MJ, Lewis JS. Imaging of melanoma using 64Cu- and 86Y-DOTA-ReCCMSH(Arg11), a cyclized peptide analogue of alpha-MSH. J Med Chem. 2005;48:2985–2992. doi: 10.1021/jm0490282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Miao Y, Hoffman TJ, Quinn TP. Tumor-targeting properties of 90Y- and 177Lu-labeled α-melanocyte stimulating hormone peptide analogues in a murine melanoma model. Nucl Med Biol. 2005;32:485–493. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2005.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Miao Y, Fisher DR, Quinn TP. Reducing renal uptake of 90Y and 177Lu labeled alpha-melanocyte stimulating hormone peptide analogues. Nucl Med Biol. 2006;33:723–733. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2006.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wei L, Butcher C, Miao Y, Gallazzi F, Quinn TP, Welch MJ, Lewis JS. Synthesis and biologic evaluation of 64Cu-labeled rhenium-cyclized alpha-MSH peptide analog using a cross-bridged cyclam chelator. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:64–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cheng Z, Xiong Z, Subbarayan M, Chen X, Gambhir SS. 64Cu-labeled alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone analog for MicroPET imaging of melanocortin 1 receptor expression. Bioconjug Chem. 2007;18:765–772. doi: 10.1021/bc060306g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Miao Y, Benwell K, Quinn TP. 99mTc- and 111In-labeled alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone peptides as imaging probes for primary and pulmonary metastatic melanoma detection. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:73–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Miao Y, Shelton T, Quinn TP. Therapeutic efficacy of a 177Lu-labeled DOTA conjugated alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone peptide in a murine melanoma-bearing mouse model. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2007;22:333–341. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2007.376.A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Miao Y, Gallazzi F, Guo H, Quinn TP. 111In-labeled lactam bridge-cyclized alpha-melanocyte stimulating hormone peptide analogues for melanoma imaging. Bioconjug Chem. 2008;19:539–547. doi: 10.1021/bc700317w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Guo H, Shenoy N, Gershman BM, Yang J, Sklar LA, Miao Y. Metastatic melanoma imaging with an 111In-labeled lactam bridge-cyclized alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone peptide. Nucl Med Biol. 2009;36:267–276. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2009.01.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Guo H, Yang J, Gallazzi F, Prossnitz ER, Sklar LA, Miao Y. Effect of DOTA position on melanoma targeting and pharmacokinetic properties of 111In-labeled lactam bridge-cyclized α-melanocyte stimulating hormone peptide. Bioconjug Chem. 2009;20:2162–2168. doi: 10.1021/bc9003475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Guo H, Yang J, Shenoy N, Miao Y. Gallium-67-labeled lactam bridge-cyclized alpha-melanocyte stimulating hormone peptide for primary and metastatic melanoma imaging. Bioconjug Chem. 2009;20:2356–2363. doi: 10.1021/bc900428x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Guo H, Yang J, Gallazzi F, Miao Y. Reduction of the ring size of radiolabeled lactam bridge-cyclized alpha-MSH peptide resulting in enhanced melanoma uptake. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:418–426. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.071787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Guo H, Yang J, Gallazzi F, Miao Y. Effects of the amino acid linkers on melanoma-targeting and pharmacokinetic propertiesof Indium-111-labeled lactam bridge-cyclized α-MSH peptides. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:608–616. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.086009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Raposinho PD, Xavier C, Correia JD, Falcao S, Gomes P, Santos I. Melanoma targeting with alpha-melanocyte stimulating hormone analogs labeled with fac-[99mTc(CO)3]+: effect of cyclization on tumor-seeking properties. J Biol Inorg Chem. 2008;13:449–459. doi: 10.1007/s00775-007-0338-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Raposinho PD, Correia JD, Alves S, Botelho MF, Santos AC, Santos I. A 99mTc(CO)3-labeled pyrazolyl–α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone analog conjugate for melanoma targeting. Nucl Med Biol. 2008;35:91–99. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2007.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Guo H, Miao Y. Cu-64-labeled lactam bridge-cyclized alpha-MSH peptides for PET imaging of melanoma. Mol Pharmaceutics. 2012;9:2322–2330. doi: 10.1021/mp300246j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Guo H, Gallazzi F, Miao Y. Ga-67-labeled lactam bridge-cyclized alpha-MSH peptides with enhanced melanoma uptake and reduced renal uptake. Bioconjug Chem. 2012;23:1341–1348. doi: 10.1021/bc300191z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liu G, Dou S, He J, Yin D, Gupta S, Zhang S, Wang Y, Rusckowski M, Hnatowich DJ. Radiolabeling of MAG3-morpholino oligomers with 188Re at high labeling efficiency and specific radioactivity for tumor pretargeting. Appl Radiat Isot. 2006;64:971–978. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2006.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Liu S, Edwards S, Looby RJ, Harris AR, Poirier MJ, Barrett JA, Heminway SJ, Carroll TR. Labeling a hydrazino nictinamide-modified cyclic IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist with 99mTc using aminocarboxylates as coligands. Bioconjug Chem. 1996;7:63–71. doi: 10.1021/bc950069+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chen J, Giblin MF, Wang N, Jurisson SS, Quinn TP. In vivo evaluation of 99mTc/188Re-labeled linear alpha-melanocyte stimulating hormone analogs for specific melanoma targeting. Nucl Med Biol. 1999;26:687–693. doi: 10.1016/s0969-8051(99)00032-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Giblin MF, Jurisson SS, Quinn TP. Synthesis and characterization of rhenium-complexed α-melanotropin analogs. Bioconjug Chem. 1997;8:347–353. doi: 10.1021/bc9700291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES