Skip to main content
Cancer Biotherapy & Radiopharmaceuticals logoLink to Cancer Biotherapy & Radiopharmaceuticals
. 2013 Apr;28(3):226–232. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2012.1231

Characteristic Variation of α-Fetoprotein DNA Nanometer-Range Irradiated by Iodine-125

Mu-hua Cheng 1,2, Yao-xiong Huang 2,✉, Jian-fang Li 1, Zheng-jie Wu 2, Liang-jun Xie 1
PMCID: PMC3615693  PMID: 23573955

Abstract

To obtain the characteristic variation of structure and functional groups of α-fetoprotein (AFP) DNA irradiated by iodine-125(125I), the AFP antisense oligonucleotide labeled with various radioactivity dose 125I was mixed with the AFP DNA in a simulated polymerase chain reaction temperature condition. After the mixtures were irradiated by the 125I from 2 to 72 hours, the mutation of the biogenic conformation and functional groups of the irradiated DNA were investigated using laser Raman spectroscopy. The shifted peak and the decreased intensity of the characteristic Raman spectra were found, which demonstrated that the structure of the phosphodiester linkage was broke, the pyridine and purine bases in DNA emerged and damaged. The model of gene conformation changed from form B to form C spectrum after the nanometer-range irradiation with 125I from 2 to 24 hours. The damage of local pyridine and purine bases gradually increased along with the accumulation of irradiation, and the bases and ribosome were finally dissociated and stacked.

Key words: gene therapy, irradiation, radionuclide, Raman spectroscopy

Introduction

It is well established that the expression of α-fetoprotein (AFP) is closely related to the occurrence and development of some primary malignancies, such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).1,2 The antisense oligonucleotide (asON) for the AFP gene is one of the efficient methods of gene therapy in HCC.2 The results in our preliminary experiment demonstrated that the radioactive iodine-125 (125I)-labeled asON of the AFP gene was more efficient to damage the AFP gene in HCC compared with only asON.3,4 This gene radiotherapy is mainly utilized the irradiation from radionuclide to damage the target gene.5,6 Auger electron emitter had been proposed as an attractive alternative to energetic emitters in gene radiotherapy.5,7 Among the Auger electron emitters, 125I is one of the most promising options, because the 125I Decay results in the emission of a large number of low-energy Auger electrons.6,8 However, the molecular mechanism of 125I irradiation in gene radiotherapy is not understood. Some experiments' results indicated that the irradiation could result in destabilizing the DNA structure and decreasing the initial level of DNA lesions.9,10 Because the DNA has an intricate helical and three-dimensional structure that keeps the DNA stabilization,11–13 the course of the structure of DNA broken by irradiation is complicated and vague.

Several lines of studies focused on the physical mechanisms responsible for radiotherapy with 125I.6,14–16 Their results indicated that 125I in close proximity to DNA reduced the Double-Strand Breaks per decay by a direct mechanism. The extent of the damaged DNA due to irradiation is dependent on the distance between the decaying 125I atom and the cleaved deoxyribosyl unit.15,16 The Auger electrons emitted from 125I deposit their all energy within several nanometers distance and their simultaneous action produces a considerable amount of damage to biomolecules, compared with that of an α particle.17 The Auger cascade would only produce disruption of ∼5 base pairs on both sides of the decaying atom if the 125I was affixed to a base that was incorporated into a duplex deoxyribonucleic oligonucleotide.16 A central decay of the Auger electron in DNA will give the highest absorbed dose, while at a distance of 3 nm, the absorbed dose will be only 10% of the maximum.6,16

However, the principle of DNA damaged by 125I irradiation is not completely understood yet.7,17 There is little direct evidence on the structure of DNA destroyed by irradiation in the range of cubic nanometers, in which the experimental evidence of DNA damage was indirectly deduced from consequences detected by the biological technique, such as polymerase chain reaction, electrophoresis, and electron microscopy. Compared with these techniques, Raman spectroscopy is a versatile technique for investigating perturbations in the structure and conformation of nucleic acid in situ and without disturbance.18–20 It can determine detailed structural consequences of early events of irradiation damages on the molecular conformation and secondary structure of DNA, and probe the sequence-related structural differences among genomic DNA species.21–25 Therefore in our study, Raman spectroscopy was used to evaluate the damage of DNA by irradiation. In this experiment, the asON labeled with 125I was mixed with the AFP DNA to induce the DNA strands damage in Situ, and the structure of the DNA was evaluated with the Raman spectroscopy technique. Any change in the Raman spectra of the DNA under the irradiation will help to elucidate the molecular mechanism of target gene radiotherapy with irradiation of 125I.

Materials and Methods

Samples labeling

The human AFP DNA and its asON (5′-AGC AGC TTG TTA AAT CAA CAT GCA-3′) were purchased from the Biosciences and Technique Limited Company. The radioactive 125I (Half life is 60.14 days) was purchased from the China Atom High Technique Limited Company. 5-iodine-deoxyurime (5-IdU) was obtained from the Sigma Limited Company. 5-IdU was labeled with radioactive iodine-125 (125I-IdU) according to the methods reported by Schaffland et al.26 Briefly, a mixture of 5-(tri-n-butylstannyl)-2′-deoxyuridine (Bu3SndUrd) (100 μg) in ethanol (20 μL), 0.1 M phosphate buffer pH 8 (70 μL), and sodium iodide was prepared. Then, the 125I-IdU was linked with the AFP asON (125I-AFPa) by means of terminal transferases. The radioactive-labeled rate was over 96% obtaining by HPLC purification and analysis.

Preparation of samples for Raman spectroscopy

The samples were divided into six different radioactivity groups, which were a1 (18.5 kBq), a2 (37 kBq), a3 (74 kBq), a4 (148 kBq), a5 (296 kBq) and blank controls (NC), respectively, and the a3 group was prepared with five same dose tubes for the experiment of series irradiation period (Table 1. Experimental design). The 10 μL 3.7 mM AFP DNA solutions were dripped to the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tubes marked with numbers from No.1 to No.10, respectively. Then, 18.5, 37, 74, 148, 296 kBq 125I-AFPa were put into the tubes of No.1 to No. 5, respectively, and the tubes of No.6 to No.9 were added 74 kBq 125I-AFPa each, whereas tube No.10 and all other tubes were added with deionized water to a 20-μL volume. The mixed complexes from tube No.1 to No.8 were processed in the way of simulated PCR condition (95°C 4 minutes, (95°C 20 seconds, 60°C 30 seconds) cycled 5 times, 4°C 10 minutes) to make 125I-AFPa combine closely to the target DNA. The Raman spectra of the composites in tube No.1 to No.4 and the control tubes were recorded using a confocal Raman microscopy (LabRam INV) after the AFP DNA had been incubated with the 125I-AFPa for 24 hours, the composites in tubes No.5 to No.8 were examined after 2, 12, 24, and 72 hours, respectively, and the complexes in tube No.9 and No.10 as controls were placed in 37°C for 24 hours.

Table 1.

List of the Experimental Design of Group, Condition, and Irradiation Time

No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Group a1(18.5 kBq) a2(37 kBq) a3(74 kBq) a4(148 kBq) a5(296 kBq) a3(74 kBq) a3(74 kBq) a3(74 kBq) a3(74 kBq) NC
Condition PCR PCR PCR PCR PCR PCR PCR PCR no PCR no PCR
Time 24 hours 24 hours 24 hours 24 hours 24 hours 2 hours 12 h 72 hours 24 hours 24 hours

PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

Raman scan and data analysis

The structure, conformation, and the functional groups of the AFP DNA were evaluated with the Raman spectra recorded using the laser Raman microspectroscopy. The Raman spectra were excited with the 514.5-nm light of an argon laser. The effective spectral resolution was 1 cm−1. Additional details about the recording settings and considerations were referred as the previous studies on living cells using the microspectroscopy.18,19,23 All the measurements were repeated in two independent experiments. To improve the signal to the noise ratio of the Raman spectra, up to 20 accumulated spectra, each taken for 15 seconds exposure time, were averaged over the spectral interval 400–1800 cm−1. The Raman spectra of the DNA solutions were normalized between 400 and 1800 cm−1 for preserving them from baseline deviations, and were subsequently corrected by subtracting the spectrum of a buffer solution prepared at identical experimental settings. The DNA Raman wave numbers, accurate to±1 cm−1, were calibrated using the 520-cm−1 band of a silicon chip before each sample recording. The method of semiquantitative calculation was applied to the acquisition of the relative spectral intensity (RIn), which is the intensity at a certain point in the spectrum (In) by subtracting the intensity of the base line (Ib), or RIn=In–Ib.

Results

No spectrum change was found in the samples in which 125I-AFPa and AFP DNA just simply mixed for 24 hours. However, the samples in which the mixed complexes of 125I-AFPa and AFP DNA were processed in the way of simulated PCR condition, there were obvious variation in the structure and conformation of the target DNA after the irradiation of 125I in different intervals (2, 12, 24, and 72 hour). The Raman spectra of the irradiated DNA and control are displayed in Figure 1, respectively. The Raman characteristic frequencies, their relevant wave numbers, and assignments are summarized in Table 2. The peak at 830 cm−1 shifted right to 832 cm−1 and its intensity became lower is found in Figure 1 after the irradiation with 125I. The peak at 1089 cm−1 shifted blue by 6 cm−1. A 1 cm−1 higher wave number of the band at 1743 cm−1 was also observed. The band at 784 cm−1 shifted higher wave number by 3 cm−1, its intensity decreased over 40 percent when the duration of irradiation time was more than 24 hours. In contrast, the intensity of the peak at 881 cm−1 increased with the irradiation time. A 3 cm−1 higher wave number of the peak at 1455 cm−1 was observed when the irradiation time was more than 24 hours, and the peak intensity was notably increased. Moreover, the intensity of the band at 926 cm−1 markedly increased when the irradiation time was 12 hours, but its peak disappeared when the irradiation time was 24 hours.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

The Raman spectra of the α-fetoprotein (AFP) DNA solutions after Auger electron irradiation closely emitted from iodine-125 in 0 (NC), 2, 12, 24, and 72 hours.

Table 2.

Relevant Wave Numbers and Assignments Measured in the Raman Spectra of α-Fetoprotein DNA Solutions with Auger Electron Irradiation in Series Period

Wave 2 hours 12 hours 24 hours 72 hours Tentative assignments
444 448 444 445 446 Cytosine, & CH2
471 472 473 476 476 Thymine
659 660 660 657 657 Guanine
701 700 701 700 708 Adenine
784 781 786 788 787 Thymine, PO2
831 831 832 833 833 PO2, B type
881 881 880 881 881 C type (d-p, bk)
926 927 928 930 929 Deoxyribose
1047 1049 1045 1045 1047 Guanine
1072 1075 1077 1080 1081 Glycine
1089 1092 1093 1095 1095 PO2, bk
1191 1194 1191 1188 1188 C=N, Guanine
1227 1229 1227 1215 1217 Adenine
1308 1314 1308 1310 1299 Adenine
1455 1453 1455 1459 1458 Deoxyribose & CH2
1528 1526 1524 1533 1533 Cytosine, Guanine
1612 1611 1612 1613 1610 Adenine
1637 1637 1638 1630 1628 Guanine
1659 1672 1669 1667 1669 C=O, bk
1743 1744 1750 1743 1743 C-C twist

bk indicates a vibration of the DNA backbone. d-p indicates a vibration of the deoxyribose-phosphate moiety.

Transient alterations of the alkaline bases were observed in different intervals of Auger electron irradiation. The Raman peaks of the adenine bases at 701, 1227, 1308, and 1612 cm−1 shifted to different extents. The Raman intensities of the peaks gradually decreased and even disappeared when the irradiation time was 72 hours. The Raman peaks of guanine at 659, 1047, and 1637 cm−1 had a mild higher shift, and the Raman intensity of the bands at 659 and 1637 cm−1 dramatically faded after 2 hours irradiation. The Raman peak of the bands for cytosine ring vibration at 444 and 1637 cm−1 shifted and decreased with the irradiation, and the Raman peak of the band at 784 cm−1 for the thymine ring vibration almost disappeared after 2 hours irradiation. These alterations of the Raman bands for bases revealed that there were perturbation in the guanine groups and disruption of the bases. However, the intensities of the bands at 881, 1047, and 1455 cm−1 increased as a consequence of irradiation. The trend of the relative spectral intensity (RIn) of the major bands on the irradiation time is illustrated in Figure 2. The figure display that the RIn of the Raman spectra fluctuate obviously in the period from 2 to 24 hours, but just change slightly after 24 hours. The intensities of the bands at 784 and 1743 cm−1 gradually decrease with irradiation time, whereas the intensities of the bands at 881, 1047, 1091, and 1455 cm−1 increase.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

The relative spectral intensity of the Raman bands of AFP DNA solutions after Auger electron irradiation in series period.

The Raman spectra of the DNA complexes irradiated from a1 to a5 group with series concentrations of radioactivity 125I and controls (NC), respectively, are displayed in Figure 3 and Figure 4. Their Raman characteristic frequencies, relevant wave numbers, and assignments are summarized in Table 3. The Raman features shown in Figure 3 that can be assigned to this change are 701→703 cm−1 (adenine), 781→778 cm−1 (thymine), 1646→1643 cm−1 (the functional groups of thymine), 1271→1275 cm−1 (cytosine), 1424→1422 cm−1 (guanine), and the Raman intensities of the spectral peaks after irradiation became lower than those in control. The Raman spectra in Figure 3 demonstrate that the characteristic Raman vibration bands of DNA are extensive, and their peak intensities reduce obviously after the target DNA exposed to the irradiation from 125I (∼37 kBq in 20-μL mixtures) for 24 hours. It was also found that the Raman band at 925 cm−1 higher wave number of 2 cm−1 after irradiated with 37 kBq 125I for 24 hours. The Raman band at 1094 cm−1 higher wave number of 2 cm−1, and the Raman band at 1738 cm−1 shifted up to 1740 cm−1. The Raman spectral intensity became weaker after the irradiation. However, the intensities of the Raman bands at 876, 1088, 1277, and 1455 cm−1 gradually increased as the radioactive concentration on the DNA further increased over 74 kBq (Fig. 4). Several additional Raman bands at 646 and 1045 cm−1 (guanine), 783 cm−1 (thymidine) and 926 cm−1 (deoxyribose) are found in the Raman spectral curve a3, curve a4, and curve a5 in Figure 4, and their Raman peak intensities increased with increasing the concentration of 125I. Figure 5 illustrates the variation of the spectral intensities of the bands at 646, 783, 876, 926, 1045, 1090, and 1278 cm,−1 respectively, as functions of the concentration of 125I. It clearly shows that the intensities gradually increase with the accumulation of the irradiation after the concentration of the 125I is greater than 74 kBq.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

The Raman spectra of the samples in a1 (18.5 kBq), a2 (37 kBq) groups, and control irradiated by Auger electron for 24 hours.

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

The Raman spectra of the samples in a3 (74 kBq), a4 (148 kBq), a5 (296 kBq) group irradiated with Auger electron for 24 hours.

Table 3.

Relevant Wave Numbers and Assignments Measured in the Raman Spectra of α-Fetoprotein DNA Solutions with Auger Electron Irradiation in Series Concentrations

Wave 18.5 kBq 37 kBq 74 kBq 148 kBq 296 kBq Tentative assignments
445 449 442 443 442 445 Cytosine, & CH2
471 472 473 476 478 479 Thymine
646 650 652 650 647 648 Guanine
701 702 703 705 708 710 Adenine
781 778 776 778 781 783 Thymine, PO2
879 881 882 880 878 876 C type (d-p, bk)
925 927 928 930 925 926 Deoxyribose
1045 1049 1045 1045 1046 1047 Guanine
1071 1075 1077 1080 1081 1088 Glycine
1094 1092 1093 1095 1093 1090 PO2, bk
1191 1192 1190 1191 1192 1194 C=N, Guanine
1271 1275 1276 1275 1274 1277 Cytosine
1388 1390 1391 1389 1390 1390 Adenine
1424 1422 1420 1423 1422 1425 Guanine
1453 1454 1455 1455 1455 1455 Deoxyribose & CH2
1526 1528 1527 1528 1527 1526 Cytosine, Guanine
1612 1611 1612 1613 1610 1611 Adenine
1646 1643 1641 1640 1638 1630 Thymine
1738 1740 1742 1741 1740 1743 C-C twist

bk indicates a vibration of the DNA backbone. d-p indicates a vibration of the deoxyribose-phosphate moiety.

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5.

The relative spectral intensity of the Raman bands of AFP DNA solutions after Auger electron irradiation emitted from 18.5 to 296 kBq of iodine-125 in 20-μL mixtures.

Discussion

It is known that the irradiation biological effect has two mainly possibilities: a direct interaction or an indirect interaction.17,27 Because the carry range of Auger electrons is extreme short (1–10 nanometers), the spatial localization of the emitters relative to the targets may require a device with micron and, perhaps, an Angstrom resolution.5,27 A majority of research's results for Auger electrons' irradiation were the indirect interactions obtained from patient, animal, or cell culture studies.5,7,26,28 In our study, all the irradiation interactions of 125I to DNA were investigated in a deionized microenvironment in vitro to decrease the indirect interactive irradiation effect. There was no spectrum change in the samples in which 125I and AFP DNA was just simply mixed with Raman analysis, but obvious variation in the structure and conformation of the target DNA in the mixed complexes of 125I and AFP DNA processed in the way of simulated PCR condition.

In the previous studies, it was hypothesized that the Auger electron cascades from the incorporated iodine atoms could destabilize the DNA structure and damage irreparably the DNA.7,26 These results were indirectly interpreted using biological medical techniques, such as comet assay, electrophoresis, and the polymerase chain reaction technique. It was difficult to obtain direct evidence of the alterative process of the DNA structure before the DNA was destroyed by the Auger electrons because of the low energy and consequent short range.17,27,29 Raman spectroscopy is a powerful technique capable of providing detailed information about the chemical nature of individual bonds.10,19,23,30 The shift of the Raman spectra peak can indicate the transformation of base groups and chemical bonds in DNA, and the change of Raman intensity can reveal the damage of base groups and chemical bonds in DNA.18,19,23

In the current study, we had showed a lot of detailed alterative information of the conformation and secondary structure of DNA radiated by the direct interaction with the Auger electron in different periods and in different concentrations of 125I, using the analysis of the Raman spectra of DNA closely irradiated with 125I in a microenvironment. The Raman spectra shift from 830 to 832 cm−1, from 784 to 787 cm−1, and from 1089 to 1095 cm−1, were found in the Raman analysis of DNA radiated by the 125I from 0 to 72 hours. These results indicated that the major B form backbone of DNA was altered by the irradiation with 125I. Meanwhile, the higher wave number shift of the Raman band at 1743 cm−1 represented a C-C conformation change in nucleoside.19,20,31 On the other hand, the increase in the Raman peak intensity at 881 cm−1 demonstrated the alteration in the conformation of DNA and perturbations of the secondary backbone structure under the action of irradiation. A similar situation happened for the spectral peak at 1455 cm−1, a 3 cm−1 higher wave number was observed, and the peak intensity was notably increased when the irradiation time was more than 24 hours. The Raman band at 926 cm−1, which was assigned to the deoxyribose ring,19,22,31,32 was also found intensity increase by the irradiation for 12 hours, however, the peak disappeared after irradiation for 24 hours. These results revealed that the conformation and secondary structure of the deoxyribose was transformed by the irradiation of the Auger electron, and further destroyed when the irradiation was cumulated more enough. The alternations of the characteristic Raman spectrum of guanine, cytosine pyridine, and purine bases were also found, which revealed that there were perturbation and disruption of the bases.

We had observed the Raman spectra of DNA complexes irradiated by the 125I in different concentrations from 18.5 to 296 kBq in 20-μL mixtures, some characteristic Raman bands of DNA found that their wave numbers were shifted, and their peak intensities reduced obviously after the target DNA exposed to the Auger electron emitted from 125I (∼37 kBq) for 24 hours. However, the Raman intensities of new bands at 646, 783, 876, 926, 1045, 1090, and 1278 cm−1, which are the characteristic Raman bands of the damage of local DNA,10,19,23 gradually increased, while the 125I dose increased, and several additional Raman bands at 646 and 1045 cm−1 (guanine), 783 cm−1 (thymidine), and 926 cm−1 (deoxyribose)19,32 become gradually strong (Fig. 5). These results indicated that the Auger electron from small dose of 125I damaged the conformation of the DNA backbone and DNA local structure; Furthermore, this conformation resulted in the deviation and stack of the bases and ribosome, even though the damage of local DNA while the radioactive dose of the 125I continually increased. We also found that the probe of AFP DNA was apart from the target DNA and their bases were stacked and accompany with the further increase of 125I dose because the characteristic Raman bands of single-chain oligonucleotide at 877, 1088, 1277, and 1455 cm−1 were obviously increased.19,32

The variations induced by irradiation on the target DNA were quite significant in our experiment. The above-mentioned detailed alterative information of Raman spectra provided the direct evidence that the nanometer-range irradiation with 125I altered gradually the backbone structure and helical conformation of the target DNA, damaged local pyridine and purine bases. However, the irradiation effect of 125I we observed was a short interaction effect in 72 hours.

Conclusions

In our experiment, the Raman spectra technique was applied to analyze the detailed alterative information of the conformation and secondary structure of DNA irradiated in different period and in series concentration of 125I. The results of Raman spectra demonstrated that 125I may alter gradually the backbone structure and helical conformation of the target DNA, damage local pyridine and purine bases and bring about the deviation and stack of the bases and ribosome. These irradiation damages of the conformation and structure of target DNA were directly detected in situ using the confocal laser Raman spectroscope technique.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the grant from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No 30970855). We gratefully thank the technicians in the Biomedical Physics Department of the Chinese JiNan University and in the Nuclear Medical Department of the Third Hospital Affiliated Sun Yat-sen University to help in the experiment.

Disclosure Statement

There are no financial conflicts.

References

  • 1.Peyton DK. Huang MC. Giglia MA, et al. The alpha-fetoprotein promoter is the target of Afr1-mediated postnatal repression. Genomics. 2000;63:173. doi: 10.1006/geno.1999.6073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Willhauck MJ. Sharif Samani BR. Klutz K, et al. Alpha-fetoprotein promoter-targeted sodium iodide symporter gene therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gene Ther. 2008;15:214. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3303057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cheng MH. Huang YX. Nanoparticle-mediated radionuclide-gene therapy of liver cancer. IFMBE Proc. 2009;25:63. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cheng MH. Huang YX. Zhou HJ, et al. Biomedical effect of 125I-AFPasON in HCC evaluated with Raman spectra. J Nucl Med. 2010;51(s1):1004. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Maier J. van Steeg H. van Oostrom C, et al. Iodine deficiency activates antioxidant genes and causes DNA damage in the thyroid gland of rats and mice. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1773:990. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2007.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Malkov VA. Panyutin IG. Neumann RD, et al. Radioprobing of a RecA-three-stranded DNA complex with iodine 125: Evidence for recognition of homology in the major groove of the target duplex. J Mol Biol. 2000;299:629. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lobachevsky PN. Martin RF. Iodine-125 decay in a synthetic oligodeoxynucleotide. II. The role of auger electron irradiation compared to charge neutralization in DNA breakage. Radiat Res. 2000;153:271. doi: 10.1667/0033-7587(2000)153[0271:idiaso]2.0.co;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sokolov MV. Smirnova NA. Camerini-Otero RD, et al. Microarray analysis of differentially expressed genes after exposure of normal human fibroblasts to ionizing radiation from an external source and from DNA-incorporated iodine-125 radionuclide. Gene. 2006;382:47. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2006.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tiwari P. Kumar A. Balakrishnan S, et al. Radiation-induced micronucleus formation and DNA damage in human lymphocytes and their prevention by antioxidant thiols. Mutat Res. 2009;676:62. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2009.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.McGeehan JE. Carpentier P. Royant A, et al. X-ray radiation-induced damage in DNA monitored by online Raman. J Synchrotron Radiat. 2007;14(Pt 1):99. doi: 10.1107/S0909049506043251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fang C. Agarwal A. Buddharaju KD, et al. DNA detection using nanostructured SERS substrates with Rhodamine B as Raman label. Biosens Bioelectron. 2008;24:216. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2008.03.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shikazono N. Noguchi M. Fujii K, et al. The yield, processing, and biological consequences of clustered DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation. J Radiat Res (Tokyo) 2009;50:27. doi: 10.1269/jrr.08086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jolles B. Chinsky L. Laigle A. Contribution of the resonance Raman spectroscopy to the identification of Z DNA. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1984;1:1335. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1984.10507524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hayes DP. Non-problematic risks from low-dose radiation-induced DNA damage clusters. Dose Response. 2008;6:30. doi: 10.2203/dose-response.07-023.Hayes. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sudprasert W. Navasumrit P. Ruchirawat M. Effects of low-dose gamma radiation on DNA damage, chromosomal aberration and expression of repair genes in human blood cells. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2006;209:503. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2006.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Adelstein SJ. Kassis AI. Bodei L, et al. Radiotoxicity of iodine-125 and other auger-electron-emitting radionuclides: Background to therapy. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2003;18:301. doi: 10.1089/108497803322285062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Moiseenko VV. Karnas SJ. Yu E, et al. Monte Carlo simulations of DNA damage from incorporated cold iodine following photoelectrically induced Auger electron cascades. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2002;99:113. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tang YL. Guo ZY. Raman spectroscopic analysis of the effect of ultraviolet irradiation on calf thymus DNA. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai) 2005;37:39. doi: 10.1093/abbs/37.1.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ruiz-Chica AJ. Medina MA. Sanchez-Jimenez F, et al. On the interpretation of Raman spectra of 1-aminooxy-spermine/DNA complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:579. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Serban D. Arcineigas SF. Vorgias CE, et al. Structure and dynamics of the DNA-binding protein HU of B. stearothermophilus investigated by Raman and ultraviolet-resonance Raman spectroscopy. Protein Sci. 2003;12:861. doi: 10.1110/ps.0234103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shaw CP. Jirasek A. The use of ultraviolet resonance Raman spectroscopy in the analysis of ionizing-radiation-induced damage in DNA. Appl Spectrosc. 2009;63:412. doi: 10.1366/000370209787944325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Barhoumi A. Zhang D. Tam F, et al. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy of DNA. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:5523. doi: 10.1021/ja800023j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Vrana O. Masek V. Drazan V, et al. Raman spectroscopy of DNA modified by intrastrand cross-links of antitumor cisplatin. J Struct Biol. 2007;159:1. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2007.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tsuboi M. Benevides JM. Thomas GJ., Jr The complex of ethidium bromide with genomic DNA: Structure analysis by polarized Raman spectroscopy. Biophys J. 2007;92:928. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.093633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Stokes RJ. Macaskill A. Lundahl PJ, et al. Quantitative enhanced Raman scattering of labeled DNA from gold and silver nanoparticles. Small. 2007;3:1593. doi: 10.1002/smll.200600662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Schaffland AO. Delaloye AB. Kosinski M, et al. The preparation of clinical grade 5-[123I]iodo-2′-deoxyuridine and 5-[125I]iodo-2′-deoxyuridine with high in vitro stability and the potential for early proliferation scintigraphy. Nucl Med Commun. 2004;25:461. doi: 10.1097/00006231-200405000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Walicka MA. Ding Y. Adelstein SJ, et al. Toxicity of DNA-incorporated iodine-125: Quantifying the direct and indirect effects. Radiat Res. 2000;154:326. doi: 10.1667/0033-7587(2000)154[0326:todiiq]2.0.co;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Brodsky B. Trivedi S. Peddada S, et al. Early effects of iodine on DNA synthesis in sulfur mustard-induced skin lesions. Arch Toxicol. 2006;80:212. doi: 10.1007/s00204-005-0032-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tseng CW. Trimble C. Zeng Q, et al. Low-dose radiation enhances therapeutic HPV DNA vaccination in tumor-bearing hosts. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2009;58:737. doi: 10.1007/s00262-008-0596-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sun L. Yu C. Irudayaraj J. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering based nonfluorescent probe for multiplex DNA detection. Anal Chem. 2007;79:3981. doi: 10.1021/ac070078z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Dootz R. Nie J. Du B, et al. Raman and surface enhanced Raman microscopy of microstructured polyethylenimine/DNA multilayers. Langmuir. 2006;22:1735. doi: 10.1021/la052739y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Grelder JD. Gussem KD. Vandenabeele P, et al. Reference database of Raman spectra of biological molecules. J Raman Spectrosc. 2007;38:1133. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cancer Biotherapy & Radiopharmaceuticals are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES