Abstract
Porphyrins are a group of tetrapyrrole pigments. Physical and chemical properties of porphyrins are often related to their compositions and structures. We conducted 1H solution NMR and UV-visible spectral analysis to characterize the structural feature of a water-soluble, synthetic porphyrin i.e. tetrakis (p-sulfonatophenyl) porphyrin, TPPS4, and its interaction with different metal ions in aqueous solutions. The results indicate that tetrapyrrole and tetraphenyl rings in TPPS4 molecule form a co-planar electron conjugation system; transition-metal ions show stronger binding capacity than alkali and alkali-earth metal ions; the relative stabilities of TPPS4-metal ion complexes can be well assessed by NMR and UV-visible spectral data.
Keywords: Porphyrin, NMR, TPPS4
NTRODUCTION
Porphyrins and their derivatives are a large family of aromatic pigments. A porphyrin molecule consists of heterocyclic tetrapyrrole unit, called porphine, and meso-substituents. The complexes of porphine-metal ions exist as pivotal components in many native proteins such as chlorophyll and hemoglobin. For synthetic porphyrins, different meso-substituents can be incorporated into the tetrapyrrole unit, so that structures and properties of porphyrins can be significantly changed.
Different types of synthetic porphyrins have a broad range of applications in biological/biomedical field. For instance, some synthetic porphyrins were used as best catalysts for the bio-oxidation of certain drugs such as acetaminophen and ellipticine, so these porphyrins may have a great future in the study of in vivo drug oxidative metabolite pathways (1). The complexes of porphyrin–nuclease were used to investigate the DNA cleavage and to get insight into its mechanism of action (2). More importantly, synthetic porphyrins can potentially serve as therapeutic drugs (called photosensitizers) for the photodynamic therapy of cancers (3–5), in which the uptake porphyrins are irradiated by light of certain wavelength; and the absorbed energy is transferred to oxygen, converting the regular triplet oxygen to singlet oxygen - an extremely reactive species that has the power to destroy the cells. Also, porphyrins can be used as contrast agents or tumor localizers in the magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (6–10).
In a variety of synthetic porphyrins, the water-soluble porphyrins are of particular interest. The higher aqueous solubility of a porphyrin is often desirable, and this can be achieved by preparing a porphyrin containing positively or negatively charged meso-groups (11–18). The water-soluble meso-tetrakis (p-sulfonatophenyl) porphyrin, TPPS4, is an important member in this category. Because of its higher aqueous solubility and uniquely symmetric structure, TPPS4 molecule has become an important target in many recent porphyrin studies (19–23). The water-soluble TPPS4 is also found capable of binding to serum albumin, a rich transport protein in blood plasma, suggesting that TPPS4 can be delivered in blood stream (14). In spite of these research developments, however, some fundamental issues regarding TPPS4 structure and TPPS4-metal ion interaction have not yet been clearly addressed.
To characterize structure of TPPS4 in aqueous solutions, we synthesized TPPS4 (see Fig. 1), and conducted 1H NMR and UV-visible spectral analysis for TPPS4 samples under varied pH or metal ion bindings. Our results revealed that tetrapyrrole and tetraphenyl rings in TPPS4 maintain a co-planar structure to fulfill the p-π electron conjugation over the rings, and such configuration may further stabilize the entire molecule. This TPPS4 structural characterization is of significance to the further investigation and elucidation of TPPS4 interaction in biological systems, because structures (planar or non-planar) of porphyrins may strongly impact their interaction with other biomolecules. For instance, it has been suggested that when a planar porphyrin interacts with nucleic acid (DNA or RNA), the porphyrin ring is intercalated into the G-C base pair to form intercalating complex; in contrast, a non-planar porphyrin is simply bound onto the major/minor groove of nucleic acid (15). From the 1H NMR and UV-visible spectral data, we also determined the relative strengths of TPPS4 interaction with different metal ions, which can be used to assess the stabilities of these TPPS4- metal complexes.
Figure 1.
Metal ion (M)-bound tetra (p-sulfonatophenyl) porphyrin, TPPS4.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TPPS4 synthesis
Analytical grade chemicals from Sigma-Aldrich were used without further purification. Following the preparation method established earlier (24), typically 0.1 mole pyrrole and 0.1 mole benzaldehyde were reacted for five hours in 50 ml of refluxing propionic acid. After cooling down, the product, meso-tetraphenyl porphyrin, was precipitated in saturated sodium acetate solution, and was washed with methanol-water solution and dried using an oven. For further purification, the crude porphyrin was dissolved in chloroform, and the solution was passed through alumina column, then the solvent was slowly evaporated. The p-sulfonation on phenyl rings was achieved by reacting 0.5 g tetraphenyl porphyrin with 15 ml fuming sulfuric acid (20% free SO3) in a closed vessel, and it was kept in an oven (80°C) overnight. The product was neutralized with 4 M NaOH solution, and treated by Soxhlet extraction using methanol as solvent. Solid TPPS4 was obtained after methanol evaporation, and the high purity of TPPS4 was verified by its characteristic UV-visible spectrum, as shown in Fig. 2
Figure 2.
UV-visible absorbance of free TPPS4.
NMR measurements
NMR samples were prepared by dissolving solid TPPS4 in D2O in absence or presence of metal chloride salt (KCl, CaCl2, NiCl2 or CuCl2). TPPS4 and salt concentrations were typically 0.1 M. After taking account of possible salt hydrolysis effect on sample pH, the final pH was adjusted in 6.1–10.3 range using NaOH and HCl (accurate to pH 0.1). No other pH buffer substances were used to avoid the interference of impurities. 1H spectra were acquired on Varian mercury-200 spectrometer at room temperature, with 90° pulse-width of 14.5 µs. The chemical shift values were referenced to TMS.
UV-visible spectra
UV-visible absorbance (in 250–800 nm wavelength) were recorded on a Beckman DU-7500 spectrophotometer, using samples of free TPPS4 and K+-, Ca2+-, Zn2+-, Co2+-, Mn3+- or Fe2+-bound TPPS4 (1:1 molar ratio) at pH 7.0.
RESULTS
1. 1H NMR spectra
TPPS4 at neutral pH
Fig. 3 shows a representative 1H spectrum of TPPS4 acquired at pH 7.0. The two major peaks, peak a around 7.59 ppm and peak b around 6.54 ppm, were assigned to tetraphenyl-H and tetrapyrrole-H, respectively. The p-sulfonate groups and nitrogens in porphyrin core were deprotonated at pH 7.0, therefore no proton signals were detected for these sites.
Figure 3.
1H spectrum of TPPS4 at pH 7.0, with peak a assigned to tetraphenyl-H and peak b assigned to tetrapyrrole-H.
Effects of pH variation
Because of low solubility of protonated TPPS4 at low pH range, it was not possible to acquire solution NMR spectra at sample pH below 5.0. When pH was increased in pH ~ 6–10 range, however, we observed that both tetraphenyl-H and tetrapyrrole-H of TPPS4 were somewhat down-field shifted, as shown in Fig. 4.
Figure 4.
1H chemical shifts of TPPS4 under varied pH.
Effects of metal ions
Effects of metal-ions on TPPS4 are described in Fig. 5. From bottom up, the 1H spectra were obtained for TPPS4 samples in absence or presence of K+, Ca2+, Ni2+, Cu2+, respectively. Relative to free TPPS4, interaction of K+ or Ca2+ with TPPS4 induced about 0.10–0.30 ppm up-filed shifts, with slightly greater effect on tetraphenyl-H than on tetrapyrrole-H and greater effect of Ca2+ than K+. In contrast, interaction of transition-metal ion Ni2+ with TPPS4 caused about 0.10–0.50 ppm down-filed shifts, with greater effect on tetrapyrrole-H than on tetraphenyl-H; while interaction of Cu2+ with TPPS4 resulted in a very broad, irresolvable peak.
Figure 5.
Effect of metal ions on 1H spectra of TPPS4. (a) Cu2+ -TPPS4; (b) Ni2+-TPPS4; (c) Ca2+-TPPS4; (d) K+ -TPPS4; (e) free TPPS4.
2. UV-visible absorbance
Intense Soret-band
The UV-visible spectrum of our free TPPS4 sample at neutral pH was characterized by an intense Soret-band centered at 414 nm, as shown in Fig. 2. This peak characterizes the monomeric, deprotonated form of porphyrin (25, 26). But other peaks (Q-band) at longer wavelengths were found rather week and insignificant in this case.
Effects of metal ions
By adding different metal ions to TPPS4 solutions, we found that the Soret-band of TPPS4 was more or less red-shifted. Fig. 6 summarizes the wavelength of Soret-band for K+-, Ca2+-, Zn2+-, Co2+-, Mn3+-, or Fe2+-bound TPPS4. We found that increases of absorption wavelength for these TPPS4-metal ion complexes can be correlated to the decreases of the metal ion radii, with a “best” fitting to a polynomial curve (Y = 546.1 – 2.86X + 0.022 X2 – 5.8×10−5 X3). In particular, the K+, Ca2+, Co2+ and Fe2+ data are well fit to the curve.
Figure 6.
The red-shift of UV-visible Soret-band (in nanometer) of TPPS4-metal complexes, in correlation with metal-ion radii (in picometer).
DISCUSSION
1. The co-planar structure of TPPS4
1H chemical shifts of two raw materials used for our TPPS4 synthesis can be referenced from the on-line spectral database (SDBS), where phenyl-H of benzaldehyde has 7.56 ppm (3, 5 positions) and 7.87 ppm (2, 6 positions); and pyrrole-H has 6.74 ppm (2, 5 positions) and 6.24 ppm (3, 4 positions), respectively. When TPPS4 is formed, the protons at 3, 4 positions of pyrrole remain in tetrapyrrole ring but the protons at 2, 5 positions are eliminated. Comparing the SDBS results with our TPPS4 spectral data (Fig. 3), it can be found that the value of 7.59 ppm (peak a) for tetraphenyl-H is in between the two resonance values for parent benzaldehyde. However, the value of 6.54 ppm (peak b) for tetrapyrrole-H is 0.26 ppm down-field shifted from the parent pyrrole-H at 3, 4 positions.
It should be understood that the tetrapyrrole unit is a highly conjugated, nearly planar macrocycle with 22 delocalized bonding π-electrons, obeying the well-known Hückel’s 4n+2 rule (where n is an integer number) for stability or aromaticity of ring structure. Relative to pyrrole, the down-field shift of peak b in TPPS4 spectrum (Fig. 3) suggests that formation of a large π-conjugation in porphyrin macrocycle enhances the “ring-current” effect on nuclear desheilding of tetrapyrrole protons.
Fig. 3 shows that effects of pH variation on chemical shifts of tetrapyrrole-H and tetraphenyl-H are nearly identical. Over the entire pH range of 6.1–10.3, TPPS4 should be fully deprotonated. However, pH changes appear to have similar nuclear shielding/deshielding at tratrapyrrole and tetraphenyl sites, suggesting a common “ring current” effect. We believe that this is indicative of an important structural feature of TPPS4, i.e. the tetrapyrrole and tetraphenyl rings are co-planar with a large p-π electron conjugation over the entire TPPS4 molecule.
To understand this structure feature, it is crucial to know that both parent materials, pyrrole and benzaldehyde, are also planar molecules; the carbonyl carbon in benzaldehyde takes sp2 hybrid and keeps in-plane with phenyl ring. During the formation of tetraphenyl porphyrin, it is four carbonyl carbons that transform into methine bridges (=C-) to interconnect pyrroles and phenyls. Therefore, it is very likely that all parent molecules of TPPS4 preferably maintain a co-planar structure throughout the entire synthesis process, unless there are other significant steric factors to force phenyl rings out of tetrapyrrole plane; but that appears not happened here. Such co-planar structure would extend the p-π electron delocalization to further stabilize TPPS4 molecule. As the result, all carbons and nitrogens in TPPS4 keep in-plane with totally 50 delocalized p-π electrons over the entire conjugation system.
This analysis can be further justified by UV-visible absorbance data. For the parent materials, the UV absorptions occur at ~210 nm (pyrrole) and ~250 nm (benzaldehyde), corresponding to π-electronic transitions on pyrrole ring and phenyl ring, respectively (27, 28). If the tetrapyrrole and tetraphenyl rings in TPPS4 were still two separated conjugation systems, we could observe two absorption peaks at different wavelengths, or at least a much broader peak due to peak overlap. However, our TPPS4 free-base has only one sharp band at ~414 nm, as shown in Fig. 2. The result also agrees with some earlier measurements (14, 26). This strongly suggests that the pyrroles and phenyls may indeed form a large, co-planar p-π conjugation, leading to a single absorption peak in visible-light range. Besides, it was found by Raman and infrared studies that the p-sulfonation on phenyl groups of TPPS4 may alter the vibrations of C-C bonds between tetrapyrrole and phenyls and, to some extent, affect the π-electron system on porphyrin ring (29). This result implies an extended electron conjugation in TPPS4, in consistence with our conclusion.
The co-planar structure of TPPS4 meso-tetraphenyl rings and porphyrin-core is novel, and its finding is somewhat unexpected to us. Such unique structural feature may have its inherent significance to the stability and interaction of TPPS4, as mentioned in Introduction section. By comparing TPPS4 with other porphyrin- or corrin-ring structures, several interesting points can be further made here. First, the co-plane of side-rings and porphyrin-core ring in TPPS4 is not the same as that in some synthetic bis-porphyrins, in which only the space-separated porphyrin-core rings are nearly co-planar (30). Second, the structures of porphyrins may strongly depend on their substituents and sample conditions. For instance, X-ray study showed that the crystalline meso-tetrakis (pentafluorophenyl) porphyrin (TF5PP) has its phenyl rings twisted by ~751°88°, making them almost perpendicular to the tetrapyrrole plane (31). This sharp difference from our TPPS4 sample can be attributed to the crystallographic packing forces between neighboring molecules in crystalline TF5PP. Third, it should also be recognized that TPPS4 structure is significantly distinctive from certain corrin systems such as Vitamin-B12. The TPPS4 ring is more rigid and more flat when viewed from the side, due to its larger conjugation system consisting of porphyrin-core ring and tetraphenyl rings, as we justified above; whereas Vitamin-B12 contains a much smaller conjugated chain within part of the ring system, and thus its side groups are surely not in-plane with the corrin-ring.
2. The binding strengths of metal-ions
From 1H line-shapes of TPPS4-metal ion complexes in Fig. 5, it can be generally concluded that binding strengths of metal ions are in a trend of K+ < Ca2+ < Ni2+ < Cu2+. The up-field shifts of both tetrapyrrole-H and tetraphenyl-H in K+- or Ca2+- bound TPPS4 are mainly due to electrostatic interaction between porphyrin-core and metal ion, and such interaction reduces the “ring current” on both tetrapyrrole and tetraphenyl (because of their co-planar conjugation), increasing the nuclear shielding of all these protons. In contrast, the down-field shifting of Ni2+- bound TPPS4 is probably caused by direct coordination between transition-metal ion and porphyrin-core. Unlike alkali and alkali-earth ions, transition-metal ions possess d-electrons, which can be delocalized through their direct coordination with porphyrin-core, increasing the “ring current” and proton deshielding. In a TPPS4-metal ion complex, the metal ion coordinated to tetrapyrrole-core typically adopt sp3d2 hybrid with four orbitals in porphyrin plane and two orbitals in perpendicular ± z direction, giving rise to octahedral geometry. However, Cu2+ may experience the so-called “Jahn-Teller effect” because of its uneven 9 d-electron configuration, which results in geometry distortion and extra binding strength. The very broad peak of TPPS4-Cu2+ in Fig. 5 is a clear evidence of strong interaction between Cu2+ ion and TPPS4.
The direct coordination between metal ion and tetrapyrrole-core also somewhat extends the conjugation from porphyrin to metal ion. According to quantum theory, an electronic excitation involved in a larger conjugated system requires lower energy absorption, corresponding to lower radiation frequency or longer wavelength. The UV-visible absorption wavelength of TPPS4-metal complexes, i.e. red-shift of TPPS4 Soret-band upon binding with different metal ions (Fig. 6), confirms such explanation. Clearly, the effect on red-shift is in a trend of K+ < Ca2+ < Zn2+ < Co2+ < Mn3+ < Fe2+, and such trend can be correlated with different metal ion sizes, i.e. the smaller is a metal ion, the more red-shifted is the Soret-band of its TPPS4 complex. This is in agreement with the so-called “Irving-Williams series”, which states that the higher is the charge density of a metal ion, the more stable is its ligand binding. Therefore, by comparing the red-shift of the Soret-band, we are able to assess the relative stabilities of TPPS4-metal ion complexes.
It should be noticed that our results presented here are qualitative. In the future, we will extend our work to quantitatively determine the TPPS4-metal ion bindings. The strength of porphyrin-metal ion interaction may depend on various factors, including the porphyrin (P) species and its charge state (such as H2P or P2−), the metal ions, solvents, temperature, etc. In fact, the binding constants (K) were obtained for some porphyrin-metal ion complexes (32). For instance, when binding to N-alkylated porphyrin HN-Me-TPPS, Cd2+ and Zn2+ have the binding constants K=1.3×10−2 and 3.3×101, respectively; and when binding to TMPyP[4], another water-soluble porphyrin, the stability constants are Zn2+ (8.3×1025) > Mg2+(7.5×1017) > Li+ (3.8×10−2) (32). The binding trends revealed in these quantitative data are somewhat consistent with our qualitative prediction, although the literature values are not totally comparable to ours because they involve fundamentally different materials and experimental methods.
In summary, our 1H NMR and UV-visible spectral analysis suggests that the tetrapyrrole unit and tetraphenyl rings form a large co-planar conjugation system in water-soluble synthetic porphyrin TPPS4. For deprotonated TPPS4, pH effects on resonance frequencies of tetraphenyl-H and tetrapyrrole-H are nearly identical, but 1H line-shapes of metal ion bound TPPS4 strongly depend on metal ion species. In general, transition-metal ions show stronger binding affinity on porphyrin core than alkali and alkali-earth ions. The relative stabilities of TPPS4-metal ion complexes can be well assessed by 1H NMR and UV-visible data. Elucidation of these spectral and structure features will be helpful to a broad range of porphyrin syntheses and applications.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This research was supported by Award Number S06GM060314 from the National Institute of Health / National Institute of General Medical Sciences, USA, to Z. Song.
REFERENCES
- 1.Bernadou J, Bonnafous M, Labat G, Loiseau P, Meunier B. Model systems for metabolism studies. Biomimetic oxidation of acetaminophen and ellipticine derivatives with water-soluble metalloporphyrins associated to potassium monopersulfate. Drug Metab Dispos. 1991;19:360–365. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gasmi G, Pasdeloup M, Pratviel G, Pitie M, Bernadou J, Meunier B. 31P NMR characterization of terminal phosphates induced on DNA by the artificial nuclease 'Mn-TMPyP/KHSO5' in comparison with DNases I and II. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991;19:2835–2839. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.11.2835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cannon JB. Pharmaceutics and drug delivery aspects of heme and porphyrin therapy. J Pharm Sci. 1993;82:435–446. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600820502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Berg K, Bommer JC, Winkelman JW, Moan J. Cellular uptake and relative efficiency in cell inactivation by photoactivated sulfonated meso-tetraphenylporphines. Photochem Photobiol. 1990;52:775–781. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1990.tb08681.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Berg K, Bommer JC, Moan J. Evaluation of sulfonated aluminum phthalocyanines for use in photochemotherapy. Cellular uptake studies. Cancer Lett. 1989;44:7–15. doi: 10.1016/0304-3835(89)90101-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hambright P, Fawwaz R, Valk P, McRae J, Bearden AJ. The distribution of various water soluble radioactive metalloporphyrins in tumor bearing mice. Bioinorg Chem. 1975;5:87–92. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3061(00)80224-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zanelli GD, Kaelin AC. Iodinated hydroxyphenyl and hydroxynaphthyl porphyrins as tumour localisers. Br J Cancer. 1990;61:687–688. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1990.155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hoehn-Berlage M, Norris D, Bockhorst K, Ernestus RI, Kloiber O, Bonnekoh P, Leibfritz D, Hossmann KA. T1 snapshot FLASH measurement of rat brain glioma: kinetics of the tumor-enhancing contrast agent manganese (III) tetraphenylporphine sulfonate. Magn Reson Med. 1992;27:201–213. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910270202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hindre F, Le PM, de Certaines JD, Foultier MT, Patrice T, Simonneaux G. Tetra-p-aminophenylporphyrin conjugated with Gd-DTPA: tumor-specific contrast agent for MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1993;3:59–65. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1880030111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kessel D. Porphyrin localization: a new modality for detection therapy of tumors. Biochem Pharmacol. 1984;33:1389–1393. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(84)90403-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fiel RJ, Button TM, Gilani S, Mark EH, Musser DA, Henkelman RM, Bronskill MJ, van Heteren JG. Proton relaxation enhancement by manganese(III)TPPS4 in a model tumor system. Magn Reson Imaging. 1987;5:149–156. doi: 10.1016/0730-725x(87)90044-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Schmiedl UP, Nelson JA, Starr FL, Schmidt R. Hepatic contrast-enhancing properties of manganese-mesoporphyrin and manganese-TPPS4. A comparative magnetic resonance imaging study in rats. Invest Radiol. 1992;27:536–542. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199207000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kano K, Kitagishi H, Tamura S, Yamada A. Anion binding to a ferric porphyrin complexed with per-O-methylated beta-cyclodextrin in aqueous solution. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:15202–15210. doi: 10.1021/ja045472i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bartosova J, Kalousek I, Hrkal Z. Binding of meso-tetra(4-sulfonatophenyl)porphine to haemopexin and albumin studied by spectroscopy methods. Int J Biochem. 1994;26:631–637. doi: 10.1016/0020-711x(94)90162-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Butje K, Schneider JH, Kim JJ, Wang Y, Ikuta S, Nakamoto K. Interactions of water-soluble porphyrins with hexadeoxyribonucleotides: resonance raman, UV-visible and 1H NMR studies. J Inorg Biochem. 1989;37:119–134. doi: 10.1016/0162-0134(89)80035-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Verchere-Beaur C, Mikros E, Perree-Fauvet M, Gaudemer A. Structural studies of metalloporphyrins. Part XIa: Complexes of water-soluble zinc(II) porphyrins with amino acids: influence of ligand-ligand interactions on the stability of the complexes. J Inorg Biochem. 1990;40:127–139. doi: 10.1016/0162-0134(90)80046-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Adeyemo AO, Williams GN. Kinetics of The Reaction between Zinc(II) and Tetrakis(2-Fluoro-3-Sulfonatophenyl) Porphyrin. Synth React Inorg Met -Org Chem. 1998;28:771–779. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gasparyan G, Hovhannisyan G, Ghazaryan R, Sahakyan L, Tovmasyan A, Grigoryan R, Sarkissyan N, Haroutiunian S, Aroutiounian R. In vitro testing of cyto- and genotoxicity of new porphyrin water-soluble metal derivatives. Int J Toxicol. 2007;26:497–502. doi: 10.1080/10915810701707056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Borbas KE, Kee HL, Holten D, Lindsey JS. A compact water-soluble porphyrin bearing an iodoacetamido bioconjugatable site. Org Biomol Chem. 2008;6:187–194. doi: 10.1039/b715072e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Huszank R, Lendvay G, Horvath O. Air-stable, heme-like water-soluble iron(II) porphyrin: in situ preparation and characterization. J Biol Inorg Chem. 2007;12:681–690. doi: 10.1007/s00775-007-0217-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tian F, Johnson EM, Zamarripa M, Sansone S, Brancaleon L. Binding of porphyrins to tubulin heterodimers. Biomacromolecules. 2007;8:3767–3778. doi: 10.1021/bm700687x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kolarova H, Bajgar R, Tomankova K, Nevrelova P, Mosinger J. Comparison of sensitizers by detecting reactive oxygen species after photodynamic reaction in vitro. Toxicol In Vitro. 2007;21:1287–1291. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2007.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Santiago PS, Neto DS, Barbosa LR, Itri R, Tabak M. Interaction of meso-tetrakis (4-sulfonatophenyl) porphyrin with cationic CTAC micelles investigated by small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) J Colloid Interface Sci. 2007;316:730–740. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2007.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Srivastava TS, Tsutsui T. Preparation and purification of tetrasodium meso-tetra (p-sulfophenyl)porphyrin. An easy procedure. J Org Chem. 1982;38:2103–2109. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Aggarwal LP, Borissevitch IE. On the dynamics of the TPPS4 aggregation in aqueous solutions: successive formation of H and J aggregates. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2006;63:227–233. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2005.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hanyz I, Wrobel D. The influence of pH on charged porphyrins studied by fluorescence and photoacoustic spectroscopy. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2002;1:126–132. doi: 10.1039/b108837h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bowden K, Braude EA, Jones ERH. Studies in light absorption. Part III. Auxochromatic properties and periodic system. J Chem Soc. 1946:948–952. doi: 10.1039/jr9460000948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dearden JC, Forbes WF. Light absorption studies. Part XII. Ultraviolet spectra of bensaldehydes. Can J Chem. 1958;36:1362–1370. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhang YH, Chen DM, He T, Liu FC. Raman and infrared spectral study of meso-sulfonatophenyl substituted porphyrins (TPPSn, n = 1, 2A, 2O, 3, 4) Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2003;59:87–101. doi: 10.1016/s1386-1425(02)00124-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Johnston MR. Bis-Porphyrin Racks with Space-Separated Co-Planar Porphyrin Rings. Molecules. 2001;6:406–416. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kadish KM, Araullo-McAdams C, Han BC, Franzen MM. Synthesis and Spectroscopic Characterization of (T(p-Me2N)F4PP)H2 and (T(p-Me2N)F4PP)M Where T(p-Me2N)F4PP Is the Dianion ofmeso-Tetrakis (o,o,m,m-tetrafluoro-p-(dimethylamino)phenyl)-porphyrin and M = Co(II),Cu(II) or Ni(II). Structures of (T(p-Me2N)F4PP)Co and (meso-Tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)porphinato)cobalt(II), (TF5PP)Co. J Am Chem Soc. 1990;112:8364–8368. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hambright P. Chemistry of Water Soluble Porphyrings. In: Kadish KM, Smith KM, Guilard R, editors. The Porphyrin Hand Book, Volume 3: Inorganic, Organometallic and Coordination Chemistry. San Diego, USA: Academic Press; 2000. pp. 129–210. [Google Scholar]






