Abstract
Background
Recent work detected for the first time a high-risk prostate cancer mutation, in homeobox B13 (HOXB13) among European-Americans.
Methods
We further evaluated this G84E missense mutation (rs138213197) in two genetic association studies of prostate cancer: a family-based study of brothers and a case-control study of more aggressive disease (N=2,665 total). We then calculated overall impact of this mutation by pooling all published studies of European-Americans.
Results
In our studies the mutation was found exclusively among men with prostate cancer (carrier frequency=1.48%) or unaffected brothers of cases carrying the mutation (frequency=0.34%), and carrying the mutation gave an odds ratio for disease=4.79 (P=0.01). The G84E mutation was more common among men with an earlier age of onset (≤55 years) or a family history of prostate cancer. We also observed for the first time an African-American case carrying the G84E mutation, although at HOXB13 both of his chromosomes were of European-American ancestry. The pooled analysis also indicated that carrying the G84E mutation results in an almost five-fold increase in risk of prostate cancer (P=3.5×10−17), and this risk is even higher among cases with an early age of prostate cancer onset (≤55 years) or a family history of disease: a test of heterogeneity across these strata gives P<1×10−5.
Conclusions
The HOXB13 mutation substantially increases risk of early onset, familial prostate cancer in European-American men. Impact: Testing for the G84E mutation in men with a positive family history may help distinguish those who merit more regular screening for prostate cancer.
Keywords: Familial Cancer, Genetic Association, Homeobox, Functional Mutation, Prostate Cancer
Introduction
Prostate cancer is a complex disease with high morbidity and mortality, and the highest heritability of common cancers (1). Genome-wide association studies have successfully detected well over 50 common low-risk single nucleotide polymorphisms for prostate cancer, and taken together these variants explain an increasing proportion of heritability although much remains unexplained (2). In contrast, linkage studies searching for high-penetrance prostate cancer genes have yielded limited success: while numerous chromosomal regions potentially containing prostate cancer genes have been localized, until recently no high-penetrance genes within these regions have been convincingly identified (3). This contrasts with the situation for other common cancers such as breast and ovarian cancers, where numerous high-risk genes have been detected (e.g., BRCA1/2).
Now a high-penetrance gene for prostate cancer has been detected: HOXB13, which encodes the transcription factor homeobox B13. The gene was detected by sequencing 94 unrelated men from heavily loaded prostate cancer families exhibiting linkage to a previously reported region on chromosome 17q21-22 (4-6). In four families of European-American ancestry, a rare nonsynonymous mutation—substitution of glutamic acid for glycine—was detected in HOXB13 (G84E, rs138213197) (7). This mutation was then genotyped in a large number of additional samples and was seen in 72 out of 5083 cases (carrier frequency=1.44%), but only 1 of 1401 controls (frequency=0.07%). The G84E mutation frequency was increased to 2.2% when restricting to men with an early age of disease onset (≤55 years) or a positive family history of prostate cancer (7). Other studies have confirmed this finding in men with European ancestry (8-10), and different HOXB13 mutations have been detected in prostate cancer cases of African and Asian ancestry (7, 9, 11).
To further investigate the potential role of the high-penetrance HOXB13 mutation in prostate cancer, we tested the G84E missense mutation in two studies with different designs than previously undertaken: a family-based study of brothers concordant and discordant for disease, and a case-control study of more aggressive disease at diagnosis. In addition to helping characterize this mutation in a broader set of samples, these studies allow us to investigate the carrier status among unaffected first-degree relatives of cases, whether the mutation is more common among men with aggressive prostate cancer, and whether it occurs among African-American men. We also calculated the overall impact of HOXB13 G84E on prostate cancer with a pooled analysis of all results in European-American men published to date.
Materials and Methods
Study subjects
The subjects in both studies were recruited from the major medical institutions in the greater Cleveland, OH area and from the Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI. The family-based study has been previously described (12). Briefly, it included sets of siblings where one brother had prostate cancer diagnosed at age 73 or younger and at least one brother with or without prostate cancer (N = 1,124, 647 cases, 477 controls). The sibling sets included: 443 pairs (82 case-control, 82 case-case); 60 trios (39 with one case and two controls; 13 with two cases and one control, and eight with three cases); and 16 quartets or larger. All controls were no more than 8 years younger than their brother’s age at diagnosis. These age restrictions were used in an attempt to increase the potential for genetic factors affecting disease, and to reduce the probability that the controls were not unaffected due simply to being of a younger age. The second population included aggressive incident prostate cancer cases and controls from the same medical institutions (N=1,540, 998 cases and 542 controls). This has also been previously described (13). These cases were newly diagnosed with histologically confirmed disease, with any one of the following: Gleason score ≥7; tumor stage ≥T2c; or a prostate-specific antigen level greater than 10 ng/ml at diagnosis.
For both populations, case diagnoses were verified from medical record review and Gleason scores were based on pathology reports from radical prostatectomy specimens when available and otherwise from biopsy specimens. Controls had no diagnosis of prostate cancer or any other non-skin cancer. At the study entry, controls underwent prostate cancer screening with serum PSA testing and follow-up if their PSA was elevated (93% and 100% of the controls had their PSA tested in the family-based and case-control studies, respectively). If a value of 4.0 ng/ml or greater was attained then a formal evaluation for prostate cancer by a urologist was undertaken. Depending on the evaluation, a biopsy of the prostate for histological diagnosis was performed. They were retained in the study as controls unless a subsequent diagnosis of prostate cancer was made—at which time they were reclassified as cases.
Ethics approval for these studies was obtained from the Institutional Review Board human subjects research committees at all institutions/hospitals from which participants were recruited (the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, University Hospitals of Cleveland/Case Western Reserve University, and the Henry Ford Health Systems), as at the University of Southern California and University of California, San Francisco. All men in these studies provided written informed consent.
Genotyping and Sequencing
Standard venipuncture was used to collect blood samples from all study participants in tubes with EDTA as an anti-coagulant. Genomic DNA was extracted from buffy coats using the QIAmp DNA Blood kit or the EZ1 DNA blood kit (QIAGEN, Inc., Valencia, CA). A custom TaqMan SNP genotyping assay (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) was used for detection of the HOXB13 G84E mutation. The TaqMan assay used the Type-it Fast SNP PCR Master Mix (Qiagen) and was read on a 7900HT Real-Time PCR System (Life Technologies). To ensure quality control, 2% of samples were randomly selected and re-genotyped. All observed mutations were PCR amplified and sequenced (Genewiz, La Jolla, CA). Both the replicate samples and the sequenced samples were 100% concordant with the observed genotypes.
Statistical Analyses
Case and control carrier frequencies of the HOXB13 G84E were calculated overall, and among cases within strata defined by age of onset (i.e., ≤55 years) and family history of prostate cancer (defined as having at least one first- or second-degree relative with prostate cancer). To formally evaluate the case-control differences in mutation frequencies within both of our study populations, we estimated odds ratios and p-values from a mixed effects logistic regression model. This allows for correlated non-independent outcomes among family members due to family structure or shared environment via a random effects intercept, and adjusts for potential confounders (i.e., age, race/ethnicity, and medical institution). We also undertook a pooled analysis of the HOXB13 G84E results published to date in European-Americans. The counts of carriers and non-carriers by disease status were used to calculate summary frequencies, as well as odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and p-values for association, again overall and within strata defined by age of onset and family history. Across these strata we tested for heterogeneity in the mutation—prostate cancer associations. All p-values are from two-sided tests, and all analyses were undertaken with R.
Results
Demographic and clinical details for the 1,645 cases and 1,019 controls from the two study populations are given in Table 1. The stage and grade are lower in the family-based than aggressiveness study, reflecting the inclusion criteria for the latter.
Table 1.
Family-based Study |
Aggressiveness Studya |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cases | Controls | Cases | Controls | |
No., (%) | 647 (58%) | 477 (42%) | 998 (65%) | 542 (35%) |
Age, mean (±SD) | 61.9 (±6.8) | 62.7 (±9.1) | 64.1 (±7.9) | 65.8 (±8.6) |
>55 years | 520 (80%) | 367 (77%) | 853 (86%) | 470 (87%) |
≤55 years | 127 (20%) | 110 (23%) | 145 (14%) | 72 (13%) |
Family History of Prostate cancer | ||||
Negative | 351 (55%) | 393 (83%) | 847 (87%) | 530 (98%) |
Positive | 287 (45%) | 81 (17%) | 130 (13%) | 10 (2%) |
Race/Ethnicity, n (%) | ||||
White | 584 (90%) | 438 (92%) | 698 (70%) | 432 (80%) |
African American | 63 (10%) | 39 (8%) | 300 (30%) | 110 (20%) |
Gleason Score, n (%) | ||||
≤6 | 339 (55%) | NA | 218 (24%) | NA |
7 | 204 (33%) | NA | 508 (56%) | NA |
≥8 | 73 (12%) | NA | 184 (20%) | NA |
Tumor Stage, n (%) | ||||
T1 | 302 (50%) | NA | 404 (39%) | NA |
T2a-T2b | 214 (36%) | NA | 183 (19%) | NA |
T2c | 37 (6%) | NA | 291 (31%) | NA |
≥T3 | 44 (7%) | NA | 97 (11%) | NA |
PSA; ng/ml, median (1st – 3rd quartile)b | 7.0 (5.0 - 11.0) | 1.5 (0.8 - 2.6) | 6.6 (4.8 - 11.4) | 1.2 (0.7 - 2.2) |
‘Aggressive disease defined as having any of the following: Gleason score ≥7; tumor stage ≥T2c; or a prostate-specific antigen level greater than 10 ng/ml at diagnosis
At diagnosis for cases; at recruitment into study for controls
The HOBX13 G84E mutation (rs138213197) was detected exclusively among men with prostate cancer or unaffected brothers of cases carrying the mutation (Table 2). In particular, within the family-based study, 12 cases (carrier frequency=12/635=1.89%) and three controls (frequency=3/474=0.63%) carried the mutation. When only considering families where the control brothers were at least as old as the cases, we observed a very similar carrier frequency (2/284=0.70%). Six of the 12 cases came from three families—that is there were three sets of concordantly affected mutation carriers. Another three of the 12 had unaffected siblings who also carried the mutation. Thus, in total 12 of the 15 men (80%) with the mutation were from six families with multiple carriers (nine cases, three controls). The percentage of families segregating the HOBX13 G84E mutation was 9/526=1.71%. In the study of more aggressive disease, eight cases carried the HOXB13 G84E mutation (frequency = 0.81%), but none of the controls were carriers (Table 2). Combining the data from both of our studies in the mixed effects model, carrying the mutation increased risk of prostate cancer almost five fold (adjusted odds ratio=4.79 p=0.011).
Table 2.
Study | G84E Carriers (n) |
G84E Noncarriers (n) |
Carrier Frequency (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Family-based | |||
Controls | 3 | 474 | 0.63% |
Cases | 12 | 635 | 1.89% |
Aggressive disease | |||
Controls | 0 | 542 | 0% |
Cases | 8 | 990 | 0.81% |
Both Studies | |||
Controls | 3 | 1016 | 0.29% |
Cases | 20 | 1625 | 1.22% |
Both: Cases Only | |||
Age at prostate cancer diagnosis |
|||
>55 years | 13 | 1360 | 0.96% |
≤55 years | 7 | 265 | 2.64% |
Family history of prostate cancer |
|||
Negative | 13 | 1185 | 1.10% |
Positive | 6 | 411 | 1.46% |
The frequency of carrying the HOXB13 G84E mutation was higher among cases with an earlier age at disease onset: for age ≤55 years the carrier frequency=2.64%, whereas for age>55 years the frequency=0.96% (Table 2). A smaller difference in the mutation frequency was observed among cases with and without a family history of prostate cancer: 1.46% versus 1.10%, respectively (Table 2). When looking at each study alone, even this small difference was no longer evident—possibly reflecting the limited number of observations. Specifically, the mutation frequency among cases with and without a family history of prostate cancer was: 1.77% versus 1.99% for the family-based study; and 0.77% versus 0.71% for the aggressiveness study. There was no noteworthy association between the mutation and tumor stage or grade (P=0.36), or recurrence/biochemical failure following treatment (P=0.75).
One of the carriers in the aggressive disease study was African-American, the first time this has been reported among prostate cancer cases. To further investigate this, we estimated his local ancestry at HOXB13. First, we genotyped his germline DNA with the Illumina 1M array, and selected his resulting single nucleotide polymorphism data spanning chromosome 17. Then we used the program HAPMIX to phase his chromosome 17 genotypes and estimate his ancestry (14). As a reference population we used the phased haplotypes of the African (YRI) and European (CEU) populations from the HapMap Project (15). We found that across a large region of chromosome 17 (~23 Mb) that includes HOXB13, both of the African-American carrier’s chromosomes are of European ancestry, indicating that this appears to be a European founder mutation. In fact, within the 1000 Genomes Project data ((16); accessed 9/12), the HOXB13 G84E mutation has only been observed twice, both times in Northern Europeans: once in a British sample and once in Finnish sample (carrier frequency in Europeans=2/758=0.2%).
Table 3 presents the HOXB13 G84E mutation results to date from prostate cancer studies of European-Americans, the 1000 Genomes Project, and the Exome Sequencing Project (accessed 9/12). The overall mutation carrier frequency in European-American prostate cancer cases=1.34% and in controls=0.28%. Comparing the HOXB13 G84E mutation carriers versus non-carriers gives an overall odds ratio (OR) for prostate cancer = 4.86 (95% CI=3.18-7.69; P=3.5×10−17). Restricting the cases to men diagnosed at 55 years or younger, the carrier frequency increased to 2.30% and the prostate cancer OR = 8.41 (95% CI=5.27-13.76; P=2.7×10−22). Looking at cases only, men with an earlier age of disease onset were over twice as likely to carry the mutation: OR=2.60 (95% CI=1.77-3.83), and a test for heterogeneity across the age strata was highly statistically significant (Pheterogeneity=5.2×10−7). Among men with a positive family history of prostate cancer, the carrier frequency and odds ratio were 1.97% and 7.19, respectively (95% CI=4.55-11.67; P=9.3×10−21). For cases, those with a positive family history carried the mutation over twice as often as cases without a family history (OR=2.33; 95% CI=1.56-3.52; Pheterogeneity=1.2×10−5). Across all studies the HOXB13 G84E mutation frequency did not differ among men with more or less aggressive disease (not shown).
Table 3.
Subjects | Study | Carriers (n) |
Non- carriers (n) |
Carrier Frequency |
Odds Ratioa |
95% CI | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Controls | |||||||
Ewing et al. (7) | 1 | 1400 | 0.07% | ||||
Breyer et al. (8) | 2 | 823 | 0.24% | ||||
Akbari et al. (9) | 2 | 1757 | 0.11% | ||||
Witte et al. [current paper] | 3 | 867 | 0.34% | ||||
1,000 Genomes Projectb | 2 | 532 | 0.37% | ||||
Exome Sequencing Projectb | 17 | 4272 | 0.40% | ||||
All Controls | 27 | 9651 | 0.28% | ||||
Cases | |||||||
Ewing et al. (7) | 72 | 5011 | 1.42% | ||||
Breyer et al. (8) | 20 | 1106 | 1.78% | ||||
Akbari et al. (9) | 10 | 1515 | 0.66% | ||||
Witte et al. [current paper] | 19 | 1263 | 1.48% | ||||
All Cases | 121 | 8895 | 1.34% | 4.86 | 3.18-7.69 | 3.48×10−17 | |
Age at diagnosis > 55yr | |||||||
Ewing et al. (7) | 22 | 2681 | 0.81% | ||||
Breyer et al. (8) | 13 | 755 | 1.69% | ||||
Akbari et al. (9) | 7 | 1472 | 0.47% | ||||
Witte et al. [current paper] | 12 | 1064 | 1.11% | ||||
All Cases with age > 55 yr | 54 | 5972 | 0.90% | 3.23 | 2.00-5.34 | 4.08×10−7 | |
Age at diagnosis <= 55yr | |||||||
Ewing et al. (7) | 46 | 2084 | 2.16% | ||||
Breyer et al. (8) | 7 | 351 | 1.96% | ||||
Akbari et al. (9)c | 3 | 43 | 6.52% | ||||
Witte et al. [current paper] | 7 | 199 | 3.40% | ||||
All Cases with Age <=55 yr | 63 | 2677 | 2.30% | 8.41 | 5.27-13.76 | 2.72×10−22 | |
Negative Family History | |||||||
Ewing et al. (7) | 19 | 2391 | 0.79% | ||||
Breyer et al. (8) | 4 | 264 | 1.49% | ||||
Akbari et al. (9) | 6 | 1170 | 0.51% | ||||
Witte et al. [current paper] | 12 | 922 | 1.28% | ||||
All Cases with FH− | 41 | 4805 | 0.86% | 3.09 | 1.83-5.23 | 6.26×10−6 | |
Positive Family Historyd | |||||||
Ewing et al. (7) | 45 | 2019 | 2.18% | ||||
Breyer et al. (8) | 16 | 842 | 1.86% | ||||
Akbari et al. (9) | 4 | 345 | 1.15% | ||||
Witte et al. [current paper] | 6 | 325 | 1.81% | ||||
All Cases with FH+ | 71 | 3531 | 1.97% | 7.19 | 4.55-11.67 | 9.27×10−21 |
Unadjusted odds ratio comparing cases to controls
European ancestry
From screening population of men >50 years old.
Positive Family History: case had at least one first- or second-degree relative with prostate cancer
Discussion
In our two studies and pooled analysis we have confirmed and further characterized a high-risk prostate cancer mutation in HOXB13 that is more common among men with an early age of disease onset or a positive family history, but not aggressive disease. The mutation is rare and observed primarily among prostate cancer cases of European ancestry (or in our study their unaffected brothers). While uncommon, the mutation results in a substantial increase in risk of disease, which is over eight-fold higher among men with an age of onset ≤ 55 years.
Nevertheless, the mutation is not segregating entirely with prostate cancer—since unaffected brothers and other controls carry mutations as well. Of course these men may have undetected cancer or may be diagnosed in the future. The segregation pattern indicates that the HOXB13 G84E mutation explains at least some of the prostate cancer linkage to the surrounding chromosome 17 region (4). However, not all families linked to the region segregate the mutation, suggesting that there are additional high-risk mutations at this locus (17). In fact, different rare HOXB13 mutations have been observed among prostate cancer cases of African (7, 9) and Asian ancestry (11).
The current analysis did not include two Swedish studies that detected the G84E mutation at substantially higher frequencies: 4.51% among prostate cancer cases and 1.33% among controls (10), which may reflect a founder mutation and the potentially low genetic drift among some parts of Sweden—although it is unclear whether the carriers are more commonly observed among individuals from particular ancestral sub-regions of the country (e.g., northern) (18). An evaluation of 767 Chinese cases and 1,536 controls did not detect any carriers of the G84E mutation (11). As for other cancers, the G84E mutation has been observed at an increased frequency (0.7%) among women with normal BRCA1/2, familial breast cancer who were not of Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry (19).
The G84E mutation is in a highly conserved functional domain of HOXB13, and is predicted by the Sorting Intolerant from Tolerant (SIFT) and PolyPhen algorithms to damage function. This domain mediates binding of HOXB13 to members of the MEIS homeobox protein family, that function as HOX cofactors (7). HOX expression is crucial to development, and the HOX paralogue group 13 is involved with urogenital system development (20, 21). HOXB13 is highly expressed in normal adult prostate, underexpressed in prostate tumors that are still androgen dependent, but may be overexpressed again in late-stage castrate resistant tumors (22). Moreover, HOXB13 appears to interact with and suppress androgen receptor mediated transcriptional activation (23-26).
These findings confirm that HOXB13 G84E is a high-penetrance mutation for prostate cancer in men of European ancestry that substantially increases risk of early-onset hereditary prostate cancer. The G84E mutation does not appear to affect disease aggressiveness. These observations suggest that carriers may merit closer screening than the general population but should not be subject to more aggressive therapy if diagnosed with prostate cancer.
Acknowledgments
Grant Support
This work supported by NIH grants CA088164, CA127298, and CA148537
Footnotes
The authors indicate no conflicts of interest with any of the findings or results presented in this manuscript.
References
- 1.Siegel R, Ward E, Brawley O, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(4):212–36. doi: 10.3322/caac.20121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Witte JS. Genome-wide association studies and beyond. Annu Rev Public Health. 2010;31:9–20. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Witte JS. Prostate cancer genomics: towards a new understanding. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10(2):77–82. doi: 10.1038/nrg2507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lange EM, Gillanders EM, Davis CC, Brown WM, Campbell JK, Jones M, et al. Genome-wide scan for prostate cancer susceptibility genes using families from the University of Michigan prostate cancer genetics project finds evidence for linkage on chromosome 17 near BRCA1. Prostate. 2003;57(4):326–34. doi: 10.1002/pros.10307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gillanders EM, Xu J, Chang BL, Lange EM, Wiklund F, Bailey-Wilson JE, et al. Combined genome-wide scan for prostate cancer susceptibility genes. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(16):1240–7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Xu J, Dimitrov L, Chang BL, Adams TS, Turner AR, Meyers DA, et al. A combined genomewide linkage scan of 1,233 families for prostate cancer-susceptibility genes conducted by the international consortium for prostate cancer genetics. Am J Hum Genet. 2005;77(2):219–29. doi: 10.1086/432377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ewing CM, Ray AM, Lange EM, Zuhlke KA, Robbins CM, Tembe WD, et al. Germline mutations in HOXB13 and prostate-cancer risk. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(2):141–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1110000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Breyer JP, Avritt TG, McReynolds KM, Dupont WD, Smith JR. Confirmation of the HOXB13 G84E Germline Mutation in Familial Prostate Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012;21(8):1348–53. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Akbari MR, Trachtenberg J, Lee J, Tam S, Bristow R, Loblaw A, et al. Association Between Germline HOXB13 G84E Mutation and Risk of Prostate Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104(16):1260–2. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Karlsson R, Aly M, Clements M, Zheng L, Adolfsson J, Xu J, et al. A Population-based Assessment of Germline HOXB13 G84E Mutation and Prostate Cancer Risk. Eur Urol. 2012 doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lin X, Qu L, Chen Z, Xu C, Ye D, Shao Q, et al. A novel Germline mutation in HOXB13 is associated with prostate cancer risk in Chinese men. Prostate. 2012 doi: 10.1002/pros.22552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Casey G, Neville PJ, Plummer SJ, Xiang Y, Krumroy LM, Klein EA, et al. RNASEL Arg462Gln variant is implicated in up to 13% of prostate cancer cases. Nat Genet. 2002;32(4):581–3. doi: 10.1038/ng1021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cheng I, Plummer SJ, Neslund-Dudas C, Klein EA, Casey G, Rybicki BA, et al. Prostate cancer susceptibility variants confer increased risk of disease progression. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19(9):2124–32. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Price AL, Tandon A, Patterson N, Barnes KC, Rafaels N, Ruczinski I, et al. Sensitive detection of chromosomal segments of distinct ancestry in admixed populations. PLoS Genet. 2009;5(6):e1000519. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.HapMap The International HapMap Project. Nature. 2003;426(6968):789–96. doi: 10.1038/nature02168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.1000 Genomes Project Consortium. Durbin RM, Abecasis GR, Altshuler DL, Auton A, Brooks LD, et al. A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing. Nature. 2010;467(7319):1061–1073. doi: 10.1038/nature09534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Barry M. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(27):2674. author reply 2675. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Salmela E, Lappalainen T, Liu J, Sistonen P, Andersen PM, Schreiber S, et al. Swedish population substructure revealed by genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism data. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(2):e16747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Alanee S, Couch F, Offit K. Association of a HOXB13 variant with breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(5):480–1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1205138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Graham A. Developmental patterning. The Hox code out on a limb. Curr Biol. 1994;4(12):1135–7. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00256-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Goodman FR, Scambler PJ. Human HOX gene mutations. Clin Genet. 2001;59(1):1–11. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2001.590101.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kim YR, Oh KJ, Park RY, Xuan NT, Kang TW, Kwon DD, et al. HOXB13 promotes androgen independent growth of LNCaP prostate cancer cells by the activation of E2F signaling. Mol Cancer. 2010;9:124. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-9-124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jung C, Kim RS, Zhang HJ, Lee SJ, Jeng MH. HOXB13 induces growth suppression of prostate cancer cells as a repressor of hormone-activated androgen receptor signaling. Cancer Res. 2004;64(24):9185–92. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Norris JD, Chang CY, Wittmann BM, Kunder RS, Cui H, Fan D, et al. The homeodomain protein HOXB13 regulates the cellular response to androgens. Mol Cell. 2009;36(3):405–16. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.10.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kim SD, Park RY, Kim YR, Kim IJ, Kang TW, Nam KI, et al. HOXB13 is co-localized with androgen receptor to suppress androgen-stimulated prostate-specific antigen expression. Anat Cell Biol. 2010;43(4):284–93. doi: 10.5115/acb.2010.43.4.284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jung C, Kim RS, Lee SJ, Wang C, Jeng MH. HOXB13 homeodomain protein suppresses the growth of prostate cancer cells by the negative regulation of T-cell factor 4. Cancer Res. 2004;64(9):3046–51. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-2614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]