Skip to main content
PMC home page
BMC Cancer logoLink to BMC Cancer
. 2013 Mar 21;13:138. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-138

A prospective investigation of predictive and modifiable risk factors for breast cancer in unaffected BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene carriers

Emer M Guinan 1,✉, Juliette Hussey 1, Sarah A McGarrigle 2, Laura A Healy 3, Jacintha N O’Sullivan 2, Kathleen Bennett 4, Elizabeth M Connolly 5
PMCID: PMC3618255  PMID: 23517070

Abstract

Background

Breast cancer is the most common female cancer worldwide. The lifetime risk of a woman being diagnosed with breast cancer is approximately 12.5%. For women who carry the deleterious mutation in either of the BRCA genes, BRCA1 or BRCA2, the risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer is significantly increased. In recent years there has been increased penetrance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 associated breast cancer, prompting investigation into the role of modifiable risk factors in this group. Previous investigations into this topic have relied on participants recalling lifetime weight changes and subjective methods of recording physical activity. The influence of obesity-related biomarkers, which may explain the link between obesity, physical activity and breast cancer risk, has not been investigated prospectively in this group. This paper describes the design of a prospective cohort study investigating the role of predictive and modifiable risk factors for breast cancer in unaffected BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers.

Methods/design

Participants will be recruited from breast cancer family risk clinics and genetics clinics. Lifestyle risk factors that will be investigated will include body composition, metabolic syndrome and its components, physical activity and dietary intake. PBMC telomere length will be measured as a potential predictor of breast cancer occurrence. Measurements will be completed on entry to the study and repeated at two years and five years. Participants will also be followed annually by questionnaire to track changes in risk factor status and to record cancer occurrence. Data will be analysed using multiple regression models. The study has an accrual target of 352 participants.

Discussion

The results from this study will provide valuable information regarding the role of modifiable lifestyle risk factors for breast cancer in women with a deleterious mutation in the BRCA gene. Additionally, the study will attempt to identify potential blood biomarkers which may be predictive of breast cancer occurrence.

Keywords: BRCA1, BRCA2, Breast cancer, Metabolic syndrome, Physical activity, Body composition, Dietary intake, Telomere length

Background

Breast cancer is the most common female malignancy worldwide. The lifetime risk of a woman being diagnosed with breast cancer is approximately 12.5% [1]. While most breast cancers are sporadic in nature, approximately 5-10% are attributed to genetics, arising from autosomal dominant mutations in specific cancer genes, the strongest of which are the two breast cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 or BRCA2. Women who carry these mutations have up to an 80% risk of developing breast and up to a 60% risk of ovarian cancer [2-4]. In recent years, there has been increased penetrance of BRCA1/2 mutations, which is most likely mediated by lifestyle or environmental influences [2,5,6], prompting investigation into the potential of reducing risk through lifestyle modification in this group. Understanding how modifiable and lifestyle risk factors affect cancer risk, specifically in BRCA mutation carriers, may have important implications for cancer prevention in this high risk group.

The associations between obesity, physical inactivity and certain components of dietary intake such as alcohol consumption and sporadic breast cancer risk are well established [7-10]. Obesity may increase breast cancer risk through a number of different mechanisms including insulin resistance, the metabolic syndrome, increased production of sex hormones, insulin-like growth factors, chronic low-grade inflammation and alterations in adipokines[9,11-15]. These biological pathways, in turn, are the hypothesised targets through which physical activity may exert its protective effects over breast cancer development [16,17]. However, knowledge regarding the role of these lifestyle factors in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers is limited.

A number of case-control studies have investigated the association between adult weight change and breast cancer risk in BRCA gene mutation carriers through self-reported recall of lifetime weight changes [2,18-20]. Healthy weight during adult life, particularly from menarche to 21 years, has been associated with decreased breast cancer risk [18,20] while weight loss between 18 and 30 years of age has been associated 34% reduction in breast cancer risk, particular among BRCA1 mutation carriers [18]. Consistent with sporadic breast cancer, menopausal status is a potentially modifying factor in the relationship between obesity and breast cancer risk in BRCA mutation carriers, however results are conflicting. A study by Kotsopoulos and colleagues [18], reported increased breast cancer risk with adult weight gain, regardless of menopausal status, while Manders et al.,[19] reported an association with postmenopausal breast cancer only. However, in these studies, body weight has been self-reported, rather than objectively measured, leading to potential inaccuracies in results. The association between physical activity and BRCA mutation-associated breast cancer is unclear with two studies reporting a protective effect [2,21] and one showing no association [20]. However, as with the anthropometric variables, measurement methods were limited and relied on self-reported recall.

In addition, it has been suggested that measuring telomere length may help predict risk of occurrence of certain types of cancer [22-24] including BRCA mutation-associated breast cancer [25,26]. There is some evidence to suggest that exercise may affect telomere length. For example, Puterman et al, showed that increased perceived stress was associated with increased odds of having short telomeres but only in non-exercising women [27]. Non-exercising women with a history of childhood abuse had shorter telomeres than those with no history of abuse; however, in women who exercised regularly no link between childhood abuse and telomere length was found [28]. Together, these findings suggest that telomere shortening may be modifiable by physical activity.

Reproductive factors including parity and breastfeeding practices have been associated with risk reduction in BRCA mutation carriers similar to that of the general population [29,30], suggesting that modifiable risk factors can attenuate risk in this group. However, our understanding of the potential for risk reduction for the majority of modifiable of risk factors in this high risk group remains unknown. Studies investigating women with a strong family history of breast cancer have shown that these women are no more likely to engage in healthy lifestyle habits than women in the general population [31,32] making lifestyle interventions a potentially important target. The Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA) is currently examining the role of various genetic modifiers of cancer risk in BRCA mutation carriers. Within CIMBA, and as part of the Epidemiological Study of Familial Breast Cancer (EMBRACE) study and others, the influence of lifestyle factors on breast cancer occurrence will be measured subjectively using a lifestyle questionnaire (http://ccge.medschl.cam.ac.uk/embrace/). However these associations have not been investigated using validated and objective measures of lifestyle parameters.

We plan to prospectively and objectively examine the association between modifiable (body composition, metabolic syndrome, physical activity and dietary intake) and potentially predictive (telomere length) risk factors for breast cancer and breast cancer occurrence in unaffected BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers. This study will also investigate the hypothesised link between physical activity and telomere length in a cohort of unaffected BRCA-mutation carriers. Various correlations between telomere length and physical activity, lifestyle factors and breast cancer occurrence will be examined.

Methods / design

Study design

This study is designed as a prospective cohort study aiming to evaluate the role of modifiable and predictive risk factors for breast cancer in women who have been genetically tested and identified as carriers of a deleterious mutation in either one of the BRCA genes, BRCA1 or BRCA2.

Objectives

1. To determine information on metabolic syndrome, body composition, physical activity, diet, telomere length and hormone measurements from women who are unaffected BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

2. To assess the associations between the following with body composition, physical activity and dietary intake in unaffected BRCA1/2 mutation carriers:

• Insulin resistance

• Leptin

• Adiponectin

• Inflammatory markers

• Telomere length

3. To prospectively examine the relationship between the metabolic syndrome, body composition, physical activity, diet, telomere length, and hormone measurements with breast cancer occurrence among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

Participant recruitment

A convenience sample of BRCA gene mutation carriers will be recruited from St. James’s Hospital, Dublin and the National Centre for Medical Genetics, Our Lady’s Children’s Hospital, Crumlin, Dublin. Potentially suitable participants, who have previously undergone genetic testing and have been identified as carriers of either the BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, will be identified at Breast Cancer Family Risk clinics and Cancer Genetics clinics, by medical teams and specialised breast cancer and medical nurses. At the St. James’s Hospital site, potentially suitable participants will be provided with information leaflets about the study during routine medical consultations, and if interested in gaining further information, will be directed to speak to a member of the research team who will attend the clinic. At the National Centre for Medical Genetics, Our Lady’s Children’s Hospital, Crumlin potentially suitable participants will be provided with information leaflets detailing the study during medical appointments and invited to contact the research team by email or by telephone if interested in gaining further information. Study personnel will provide further information to interested participants and assess for eligibility. Ethical approval has been granted by the SJH/AMNCH Joint Hospital Research Ethics Committee, in accordance with the Helsinki declaration, and written informed consent will be obtained from all participants.

Participants who meet the following criteria will be eligible to participate:

i. Women who have been genetically tested and identified as carriers of a deleterious mutation in either one of a BRCA genes, BRCA1/2 and who do not have a history or either breast or ovarian cancer.

ii. Aged 18 years or above

iii. Able to understand English.

iv. Willing to travel to the study site for measurements.

Participants will be excluded for the following reasons:

i. History of cancer or evidence of active disease (exception: non-melanoma skin cancer).

ii. Confirmed pregnancy or history of childbirth in the preceding 6 months. Women who become pregnant during the study period will complete follow-up active assessments at least 6 months after giving birth.

iii. Any medical co-morbidity that would preclude the ability to participate in the study

iv. Dependence on a mobility assistive device.

v. Participants, who at the local investigator’s discretion are not thought appropriate e.g. very upset and emotional regarding finding of BRCA gene mutation, family, work or transport issues that would make participation difficult.

Assessments

Participants will complete three active assessments during the study (baseline/entry to the study, two-years, and five-years) during which all measurements outlined below will be completed. Information on disease occurrence, risk reducing procedures and current lifestyle habits will be gathered yearly for 10 years using posted questionnaires. The flow of data collection throughout the study is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Flow of data collection throughout the study. Active assessments will be completed at baseline, two years and five years. Annual questionnaires will be sent by post to participants following enrolment to monitor change in lifestyle risk factors being measured.

Baseline characteristics

Demographic details will be gathered from medical charts and through patient interview. Details on past medical history, breast cancer risk factors (family history of breast cancer, oral contraceptive use, age at first birth, menopausal status, parity), and socio-demographic variables including smoking history, alcohol habits, employment status and marital status will be collected.

Body composition

Anthropometric data will be collected following a 12 hour fast. Standing height will be measured, without shoes, to the nearest millimetre using SECA stadiometer. Body composition will be estimated using a bioimpedance analyser, the Tanita MC 180 MA Multi-Frequency Body Composition Analyzer (Tanita Corp, Tokyo, Japan). Data output from the Tanita will be recorded and will include body weight, body mass index (BMI), percentage body fat, muscle mass and fat free mass. Waist circumference will be measured using a flexible measuring tape, in duplicate, to the nearest millimetre, at the mid-point between the top of the iliac crest and the last rib [33]. Lifetime weight changes will be assessed at the initial assessment by asking participants to recall their birth weight, weight at menarche, weight at age 18, 21, 30 and 40 respectively.

Blood pressure

Resting blood pressure will be measured using the auscultatory method in accordance with the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure guidelines [34]. Measurements will be taken in duplicate and the mean taken for data entry.

Venous sampling

Metabolic profile

Venous blood samples will be collected in the morning following a 12-hour fast. Participants will be asked to refrain from moderate-vigorous intensity exercise for 24 hours prior to collection. Samples will be taken to measure glucose, insulin, lipid profile (total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and triglycerides (TG)), glycosylated haemoglobin levels (HBA1c), C - reactive protein (CRP), leptin, total adiponectin and sex hormone binding globulin. Insulin resistance will be estimated using the Homeostatic Model Assessment: [(Fasting glucose (mmol.L-1) x fasting insulin (mU.L-1))/22.5] [35].

Many biomarkers of carcinogenesis must be collected and stored prior to cancer occurrences, to ensure an unequivocal link between biomarker exposure and tumorgenesis [36]. Previous studies examining lifestyle factors in this group have adopted a case-control design and therefore have not facilitated this type of analysis. In the current prospective study, serum and plasma samples will be collected and stored in a biological bank at -80°C for future analysis of associations between carcinogenesis and biological markers of obesity, physical activity and diet.

Telomere length

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) will be isolated from venous blood by density centrifugation using Ficoll-Paque™ Plus (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden). Genomic DNA will be extracted from PBMCs by standard procedures. Telomere length will be measured in extracted genomic DNA by quantative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) using a method adapted from the one origanally described by Cawthon [37]. Briefly, two PCRs will be performed for each sample: one to amplify the telomeric DNA and a second to amplify a single-copy control gene (36B4, acidic ribosomal phosphoprotein PO). This provides an internal control to normalize the starting amount of DNA. A five-point standard curve (2-fold serial dilutions from 10 to 0.625 ng of DNA) will be included on all plates to allow the transformation of Ct (cycle threshold) into nanograms of DNA. All samples will be run in triplicate and the median will be used for subsequent calculations. A relative measurement of the telomere length of each sample will be calculated by dividing the amount of telomeric DNA by the amount of control-gene DNA. Two control samples will be run in each experiment to allow for normalization between experiments and periodical reproducibility experiments will be performed to guarantee correct measurements.

Genomic DNA samples (50 ng) will be amplified in a total reaction volume of 20 μl containing 2X Quantifast ™ SYBR green PCR master mix (Qiagen Inc., CA, USA), 1 μl of forward and reverse primer (Metabion, Germany) and 7 μl of DNase free water. For the telomere amplification PCR, 300 nM of each primer (tel1b: CGGTTTGTTTGGGTTTGGGTTTGGGTTTGGGTTTGGGTT; tel2b: GGCTTGCCTTACCCTTACCCTTACCCTTACCCTTACCCT) will be used. The thermal cycling profile for the telomere amplification will be 30 cycles of amplification at 95°C for 15 s and at 56°C for 60 s. For the control gene amplification, 300nM of forward primer (36B4u: CAGCAAGTGGGAAGGTGTAATCC) and 500nM (36B4d: CCCATTCTATCATCAACGGGTACAA) of reverse primer will be used. The thermal cycling profile in this instance will be 35 cycles of amplification at 95°C for 15 s and at 56°C for 20 s and 72°C for 20 s. Both PCR reactions will require an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 15 min. Threshold cycle (Ct) values for each sample will be converted into nanograms of DNA using standard curves. Ct values from the telomere assay will be normalized to the single gene reference. The telomere length (x) from each sample will be calculated as the telomere to single copy gene ratio (T/S ratio) and will be based on the calculation of the ΔCT [CT(telomere)/CT(single gene)]. Telomere length (expressed as a relative T/S ratio) will be normalized to the average T/S ratio of the reference sample.

Metabolic syndrome classification

The metabolic syndrome will be diagnosed in the presence of any three of the following: elevated waist circumference (≥80 cm); elevated TG (≥1.7 mmol.L-1) or drug therapy for lipid abnormalities; reduced HDL-C (<1.3 mmol.L-1) or drug therapy for lipid abnormalities; elevated blood pressure (systolic ≥130 mmHg and/or diastolic ≥85 mmHg) or antihypertensive medication; elevated fasting glucose (≥100 mg.dL-1) or glucose-lowering medication [38].

Physical activity

Current physical activity levels will be objectively measured using the RT3 activity monitor (Stayhealthy Inc. Montrovia, California, USA). The RT3 activity monitor is a small, lightweight, battery operated device, designed to measure accelerations along three orthogonal planes (triaxial accelerometer). Participants will wear the monitor for seven days, during waking hours, following each active assessment (baseline, two-years and five-years). Participants will be provided with the monitor following completion of each assessment and will be given detailed written and verbal instruction on its use. Participants will also be provided with a stamped addressed envelope to return the monitor to the centre after one week (battery life of the monitor = 21 days). The validity [39] and reliability [40] of the accelerometer have been established. The output from the RT3 activity monitor will provide objective quantification of sedentary, light, moderate and vigorous intensity activity, while also facilitating analysis for adherence to activity guidelines.

Physical activity during the preceding 12 months will be estimated using two quantitative history questionnaires, The Minnesota Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire (MLTPAQ) and the Tecumseh Occupational Physical Activity Questionnaire (TOPAQ). The MLTPAQ is an interview administered questionnaire, measuring leisure-time physical activities [41] while the TOPAQ can be either self-administered or interview based and focuses on occupation-related activities of a maximum of three jobs [42]. Both questionnaires measure frequency of activity during the preceding year in terms of months and time per occasion, and combine this information with intensity scores to measure physical activity in terms of metabolic-equivalent minutes per day (MET-min/day)[41,43]. The MET-score can be derived from the Compendium of Physical Activities [44], and values can be updated accordingly during the study period. The questionnaires will be interview-administered at each of the three active assessment points (baseline, two-years and five-years). The validity of both questionnaires have been well established in a range of populations [41,42,45,46], with one study reporting significant correlations between cardiorespiratory fitness and both leisure-time activity and household activity in 375 middle-aged women [47]. Both the MLTPAQ and the TOPAQ will be completed during each of the three active assessments, through interview, according to standardised interview guidelines [41].

Finally, the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire will be incorporated into the annual questionnaire. Participants will be required to complete this questionnaire independently, but will be informed to contact study personnel should issues arise. The Godin is a simple, self-administered, four-item questionnaire that is designed to measure an individual’s leisure-time activity during a typical week to provide a global impression of an individual’s activity status [48]. The validity and reliability of the questionnaire have been established [46,48] and the questionnaire has been widely used in cancer research [49,50].

Dietary intake

Dietary intake will be assessed using two different methods, in this prospective cohort study on modifiable risk factors for BRCA1 and BRCA2 associated breast cancer, “current” intake will be assessed using food diaries and “habitual” or usual intake assessed by a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ).

Participants will be asked to complete an open-ended estimated 3 day food diary following each of the three active assessments. Participants will be provided with the diary at the end of each assessment and receive detailed verbal and written instructions detailing how it should be completed. The diet-diary booklet contains clear instructions of how to complete the food diary, as well as a detailed good and poor example of food intake. The instructions indicate that the respondent should record the food brand, portion size, cooking methods and includes a prompt for the name and daily dose of any vitamin, mineral or food supplements taken each day. General questions, for example, on the type of milk, spreadable fat usually consumed, and salt use will be asked as part of a general food habits questionnaire. Participants will be given a prepaid envelope to return the completed diary. The energy intake: calculated BMR ratio [51] will be used as a measure of the degree of energy underreporting with each dietary method.

The FFQ used in this prospective study is a self-administered Willett FFQ adapted from the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer (EPIC) study [36] and was used in the Irish Survey of Lifestyle, Attitudes and Nutrition (SLÁN) 2007 [52]. This FFQ has previously been validated for use in an Irish adult population [53]. The FFQ consists of a checklist of 149 food and beverage items divided into the following main food groups consumed in Ireland; bread and savoury biscuits; cereals; potatoes, rice and pasta; dairy products and fats, meat fish and poultry; fruit; vegetables; sweets and snacks; soups, sauces and spreads and lastly drinks. Participants will be asked to report how often each food item was consumed during the previous year using common units or portion size for each food, e.g. one egg or one slice of bread will be specified. The nine frequency responses range from ‘never or less than once per month’ to ‘six or more times per day’. Calculations for nutrient intake can be estimated via computerized software programs that multiply the reported frequency of each food by the amount of nutrient in a serving of that food. The FFQ will be incorporated into the annual questionnaire and completed by participants independently at home. Participants will be encouraged to contact study personnel if issues arise.

Annual questionnaire

Information on cancer occurrence and potential confounding factors affecting breast cancer risk will be gathered using questionnaires which will be completed on an annual basis after participants have enrolled. The questionnaire aims to track changes in modifiable lifestyle risk factors (weight, smoking, alcohol use, physical activity and diet), risk reducing procedures (prophylactic surgery), reproductive factors (childbirth, breastfeeding, use of oral contraceptive pill or hormonal replacement therapy) or cancer occurrence.

Statistical analysis

Sample size calculation: There is some evidence to suggest an association between BMI and breast cancer incidence in BRCA mutation carriers [19-21] and even stronger evidence to suggest an association with sporadic breast cancer [7]. Therefore BMI was the chosen outcome on which the power analysis is based. Assuming a difference of in BMI of 15 kg.m-1 between cases and controls, with a relative risk of 2.08, 80% power and two-sided 5% significance level 141 participants would be required per group. However, a minimum sample size of 352 was calculated to allow for a 25% drop out rate due to the long-term nature of this study.

Data will be analysed using the SPSS package for Windows. Baseline descriptive statistics will be presented as means (standard deviations) for normally distributed continuous data, medians (inter quartile range, IQR) for non-normal data and as frequency (percentage) for categorical variables. Distributions will be checked for normality using the K-S test and non-normal data will be transformed using appropriate transformations. Differences in means of continuous variables (waist circumference, blood pressure (systolic and diastolic), lipids (TC, HDL-C, LDL-C and TG), glucose, insulin, HBA1c, CRP, leptin, adiponectin, BMI, fat free mass, percentage body fat, muscle mass, percentage time in each domain of physical activity, energy intake, telomere length) will be compared across categories (BMI sub-groups, presence or absence of metabolic syndrome, adherence to physical activity guidelines) using independent sample t-tests or ANOVA as appropriate for normally distributed variables and the Mann Whitney U test (or Kruskal-Wallis test) for non-normally distributed data. Chi-squared analysis will be used to compare categorical variables across the above stated groups.

Pearson or Spearmans correlation analysis will be conducted between body composition (BMI, waist circumference, percentage body fat), physical activity and dietary intake and the following variables: insulin resistance, leptin, adiponectin, inflammatory markers and telomere length for normally and non-normally distributed data respectively. Variables found to be associated at p<0.10 will be examined further using separate multiple regression analyses with body composition, physical activity and dietary intake as the dependent variables.

Cox proportional hazards regression models will be used to compute adjusted hazard ratios of time to breast cancer (event) with 95% confidence intervals. Data will be censored at the last available follow-up where the breast cancer status was recorded. Continuous variables will be categorised into known cut-points based on previous research (BMI will be categorised as <18.5 kg.m-2, 18.5-24.9 kg.m-2, 25-29.5 kg.m-2, 30-34.9 kg.m-2, 35-39.9 kg.m-2, >40 kg.m-2; waist circumference will be categorised as <80 cm, 80-87.9 cm, >88 cm; physical activity will be categorised as adherence to physical activity guidelines (30 minutes moderate intensity activity, 5 days per week) and non-adherence to activity guidelines). Quartile cut-offs will be established for markers without pre-determined categories. Metabolic syndrome variables (waist circumference, blood pressure, HDL-C, TG and glucose) will be standardized to z-score variables with mean=0, SD=1 and a composite z-score will be computed for the presence/absence of the metabolic syndrome. Confounding variables that will be considered in the analysis include: prophylactic surgery, hormone therapy use, parity, age at menarche, breastfeeding history, age at first birth, oral contraceptive use, smoking and age. All analyses will be stratified according to menopausal status.

Due the repeated nature of the data a multilevel regression model will be performed to examine the relationship between changes over time in outcome measures, such as body composition, physical activity and dietary intake, and the metabolic syndrome while controlling for other confounding variables. Significance at p<0.05 will be assumed and SPSS will be used for statistical analysis.

Data collection

Participant recruitment will be co-ordinated by EG and SMcG. Data will be collected by EG and processed by EG, SMcG and LH. Standardized testing and data processing protocols have been developed to ensure long-term valid data collection methods. Long-term management of the data collection and processing will be directed by L.C. and JH (principle investigators). All measurements and data processing will be completed at the Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, St. James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Discussion

The results of this prospective cohort study will provide valuable information regarding the risk reducing potential of modifiable risk factors for breast cancer in unaffected BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene carriers. To date, no study has prospectively examined lifestyle risk factors in this group, nor have the biological mechanisms linking obesity and physical inactivity to breast cancer risk been investigated. This study will provide information regarding whether modifiable factors including body composition, the metabolic syndrome, physical activity and dietary intake can modulate breast cancer risk in BRCA mutation carriers, whether risk of breast cancer occurrence can be predicted in these individuals by PBMC telomere length and whether telomere length in these individuals is associated with various physical activity and lifestyle factors.

Abbreviations

BMI: Body mass index; PCR: Polymerase chain reaction; TC: Total cholesterol; HDL-C: High-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG: Triglycerides; HBA1c: Glycosylated haemoglobin; CRP: C – reactive protein; cm: Centimetre; mmol.L-1: Millimoles per litre; mmHG: Millimetres mercury; mg.dL-1: Milligrams per decilitre; MLTPAQ: Minnesota leisure time physical activity questionnaire; TOPAQ: Tecumseh occupational physical activity questionnaire; MET-min/day: Metabolic equivalent minutes per day; Kg.m-2: Kilograms per metre squared; FFQ: Food frequency questionnaire; BMR: Basal metabolic rate.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

EG, JH, JOS and EC developed the idea for this study. EG was responsible for drafting the manuscript with contributions from SMcG and LH. EG is responsible for measurement and analysis of body composition, physical activity and metabolic syndrome outcomes. SMcG is responsible for DNA processing and analysis and for measurement of DNA telomere length. LH is responsible for assessment and analysis of dietary outcomes. KB provided statistical advice and contributed to the study design. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/13/138/prepub

Contributor Information

Emer M Guinan, Email: emguinan@tcd.ie.

Juliette Hussey, Email: jmhussey@tcd.ie.

Sarah A McGarrigle, Email: sarahmcgarrigle82@gmail.com.

Laura A Healy, Email: lhealy@stjames.ie.

Jacintha N O’Sullivan, Email: osullij4@tcd.ie.

Kathleen Bennett, Email: bennettk@tcd.ie.

Elizabeth M Connolly, Email: emconnolly@stjames.ie.

Acknowledgements

Recruitment for this study has commenced. The authors would like to acknowledge Mr. Terence Boyle and the breast surgery team, the Breast Care Specialist Nurses, Dr. David Gallagher and the Genetics Nurses St. James’s Hospital, Dublin and Professor Andrew Green and the genetics team at National Centre for Medical Genetics, Our Lady’s Children’s Hospital, Crumlin, Dublin for their assistance with recruitment to date.

References

  1. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Waldron W, Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2009 (Vintage 2009 Populations) Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2009_pops09/, based on November 2011 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2012. [Google Scholar]
  2. King MC, Marks JH, Mandell JB. Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Science. 2003;302(5645):643–646. doi: 10.1126/science.1088759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Nkondjock A, Ghadirian P. Epidemiology of breast cancer among BRCA mutation carriers: an overview. Cancer Lett. 2004;205(1):1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2003.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Pruthi S, Gostout BS, Lindor NM. Identification and Management of Women With BRCA Mutations or Hereditary Predisposition for Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85(12):1111–1120. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Milne RL, Osorio A, Cajal TR, Vega A, Llort G, de la Hoya M, Diez O, Alonso MC, Lazaro C, Blanco I. The average cumulative risks of breast and ovarian cancer for carriers of mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 attending genetic counseling units in Spain. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(9):2861–2869. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Tryggvadottir L, Sigvaldason H, Olafsdottir GH, Jonasson JG, Jonsson T, Tulinius H, Eyfjord JE. Population-based study of changing breast cancer risk in Icelandic BRCA2 mutation carriers, 1920-2000. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98(2):116–122. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. World Cancer Research Fund / American Institute for Cancer Research. Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and the Prevention of Cancer: a Global Perspective. Washington, DC: AICR; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  8. Harvie M, Hooper L, Howell AH. Central obesity and breast cancer risk: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2003;4(3):157–173. doi: 10.1046/j.1467-789X.2003.00108.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pichard C, Plu-Bureau G, Neves ECM, Gompel A. Insulin resistance, obesity and breast cancer risk. Maturitas. 2008;60(1):19–30. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lynch BM, Neilson HK, Friedenreich CM. Physical activity and breast cancer prevention. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2011;186:13–42. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-04231-7_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bjorge T, Lukanova A, Jonsson H, Tretli S, Ulmer H, Manjer J, Stocks T, Selmer R, Nagel G, Almquist M. Metabolic syndrome and breast cancer in the me-can (metabolic syndrome and cancer) project. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19(7):1737–1745. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Muti P, Quattrin T, Grant BJ, Krogh V, Micheli A, Schunemann HJ, Ram M, Freudenheim JL, Sieri S, Trevisan M. Fasting glucose is a risk factor for breast cancer: a prospective study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11(11):1361–1368. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Del Giudice ME, Fantus IG, Ezzat S, McKeown-Eyssen G, Page D, Goodwin PJ. Insulin and related factors in premenopausal breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1998;47(2):111–120. doi: 10.1023/A:1005831013718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gunter MJ, Hoover DR, Yu H, Wassertheil-Smoller S, Rohan TE, Manson JE, Li J, Ho GY, Xue X, Anderson GL. Insulin, insulin-like growth factor-I, and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(1):48–60. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rose DP, Komninou D, Stephenson GD. Obesity, adipocytokines, and insulin resistance in breast cancer. Obes Rev. 2004;5(3):153–165. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2004.00142.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Neilson HK, Friedenreich CM, Brockton NT, Millikan RC. Physical activity and postmenopausal breast cancer: proposed biologic mechanisms and areas for future research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18(1):11–27. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ballard-Barbash R, Friedenreich CM, Courneya KS, Siddiqi SM, McTiernan A, Alfano CM. Physical activity, biomarkers, and disease outcomes in cancer survivors: a systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104(11):815–840. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kotsopoulos J, Olopado OI, Ghadirian P, Lubinski J, Lynch HT, Isaacs C, Weber B, Kim-Sing C, Ainsworth P, Foulkes WD. Changes in body weight and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res. 2005;7(5):R833–843. doi: 10.1186/bcr1293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Manders P, Pijpe A, Hooning MJ, Kluijt I, Vasen HF, Hoogerbrugge N, van Asperen CJ, Meijers-Heijboer H, Ausems MG, van Os TA. Body weight and risk of breast cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;126(1):193–202. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-1120-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nkondjock A, Robidoux A, Paredes Y, Narod SA, Ghadirian P. Diet, lifestyle and BRCA-related breast cancer risk among French-Canadians. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006;98(3):285–294. doi: 10.1007/s10549-006-9161-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pijpe A, Manders P, Brohet RM, Collee JE, Verhoef S, Vasen HR. Physical activity and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;120:235–44. doi: 10.1007/s10549-009-0476-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rashid-Kolvear F, Pintilie M, Done SJ. Telomere length on chromosome 17q shortens more than global telomere length in the development of breast cancer. Neoplasia. 2007;9(4):265–270. doi: 10.1593/neo.07106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Shen J, Terry MB, Gurvich I, Liao Y, Senie RT, Santella RM. Short telomere length and breast cancer risk: a study in sister sets. Cancer Res. 2007;67(11):5538–5544. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Xing J, Ajani JA, Chen M, Izzo J, Lin J, Chen Z, Gu J, Wu X. Constitutive short telomere length of chromosome 17p and 12q but not 11q and 2p is associated with an increased risk for esophageal cancer. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2009;2(5):459–465. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gramatges MM, Telli ML, Balise R, Ford JM. Longer relative telomere length in blood from women with sporadic and familial breast cancer compared with healthy controls. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19(2):605–613. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Martinez-Delgado B, Yanowsky K, Inglada-Perez L, Domingo S, Urioste M, Osorio A, Benitez J. Genetic anticipation is associated with telomere shortening in hereditary breast cancer. PLoS Genet. 2011;7(7):e1002182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Puterman E, Lin J, Blackburn E, O’Donovan A, Adler N, Epel E. The power of exercise: buffering the effect of chronic stress on telomere length. PLoS One. 2010;5(5):e10837. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lin J, Puterman E, O’Donovan A, Krauss J, Lazaro A, Truong W, Cheon J, Epel E, Blackburn EH. Psychological stress and its relationship to telomere length maintenance. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research: 2011; Orlando, FL: AACR. Cancer Res. 2011;71(8 Suppl) Abstract nr 1834. doi: 10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-1834. [Google Scholar]
  29. Milne RL, Osorio A, Ramon Y CT, Baiget M, Lasa A, Diaz-Rubio E, De la Hoya M, Caldes T, Teule A, Lazaro C. Parity and the risk of breast and ovarian cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;119(1):221–232. doi: 10.1007/s10549-009-0394-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kotsopoulos J, Lubinski J, Salmena L, Lynch HT, Kim-Sing C, Foulkes WD, Ghadirian P, Neuhausen SL, Demsky R, Tung N. Breastfeeding and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14(2):R42. doi: 10.1186/bcr3138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ochoa EM, Gomez-Acebo I, Rodriguez-Cundin P, Navarro-Cordoba M, Llorca J, Dierssen-Sotos T. Relationship between family history of breast cancer and health-related behavior. Behav Med. 2010;36(4):123–129. doi: 10.1080/08964289.2010.516783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Spector D, Deroo LA, Sandler DP. Lifestyle behaviors in black and white women with a family history of breast cancer. Prev Med. 2011;52(5):394–397. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. World Health Organization. Waist Circumference and Waist-Hip Ratio: Report of a WHO Expert Consultation. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008. pp. 8–11. [Google Scholar]
  34. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, Jones DW, Materson BJ, Oparil S, Wright JT Jr. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289(19):2560–2572. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.19.2560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985;28(7):412–419. doi: 10.1007/BF00280883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Riboli E, Kaaks R. The EPIC Project: rationale and study design. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Int J Epidemiol. 1997;1:S6–14. doi: 10.1093/ije/26.suppl_1.s6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Cawthon RM. Telomere measurement by quantitative PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(10):e47. doi: 10.1093/nar/30.10.e47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ, Cleeman JI, Donato KA, Fruchart JC, James WP, Loria CM, Smith SC Jr. Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Circulation. 2009;120(16):1640–1645. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Rowlands AV, Thomas PW, Eston RG, Topping R. Validation of the RT3 triaxial accelerometer for the assessment of physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(3):518–524. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000117158.14542.E7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Powell SM, Jones DI, Rowlands AV. Technical variability of the RT3 accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(10):1773–1778. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000089341.68754.BA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Taylor HL, Jacobs DR Jr, Schucker B. A questionnaire for the assessment of leisure time physical activities. J Chronic Dis. 1978;31(12):741–755. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(78)90058-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ainsworth BE, Jacobs DR Jr, Leon AS, Richardson MT, Montoye HJ. Assessment of the accuracy of physical activity questionnaire occupational data. J Occup Med. 1993;35(10):1017–1027. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Steele R, Mummery K. Occupational physical activity across occupational categories. J Sci Med Sport. 2003;6(4):398–407. doi: 10.1016/S1440-2440(03)80266-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, O’Brien WL, Bassett DR Jr, Schmitz KH, Emplaincourt PO. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(9 Suppl):S498–504. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200009001-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Richardson MT, Leon AS, Jacobs DR Jr, Ainsworth BE, Serfass R. Comprehensive evaluation of the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47(3):271–281. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90008-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Jacobs DR Jr, Ainsworth BE, Hartman TJ, Leon AS. A simultaneous evaluation of 10 commonly used physical activity questionnaires. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993;25(1):81–91. doi: 10.1249/00005768-199301000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wilbur J, Holm K, Dan A. A quantitative survey to measure energy expenditure in midlife women. J Nurs Meas. 1993;1(1):29–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Godin G, Shephard RJ. A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1985;10(3):141–146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Courneya KS, Mackey JR, Bell GJ, Jones LW, Field CJ, Fairey AS. Randomized controlled trial of exercise training in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors: cardiopulmonary and quality of life outcomes. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(9):1660–1668. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Stevinson C, Faught W, Steed H, Tonkin K, Ladha AB, Vallance JK, Capstick V, Schepansky A, Courneya KS. Associations between physical activity and quality of life in ovarian cancer survivors. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;106(1):244–250. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.03.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Schofield WN. Predicting basal metabolic rate, new standards and review of previous work. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr. 1985;39(Suppl 1):5–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Harrington, Janus, Perry, Ivan, Lutomski, Jennifer, Morgan, Karen, McGee, Hannah, Shelley, Emer, Watson, Dorothy, Barry, MargaretSLAN 2007: Survey of Lifestyle, Attitudes and Nutrition in Ireland. Dietary Habits of the Irish Population (2008). Psychology Reports Paper 6. http://epubs.rcsi.ie/psycholrep/6.
  53. Harrington J. Validation of a Food Frequency Questionnaire as a tool for assessing nutrient intake. Galway: National University of Ireland; 1997. [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMC Cancer are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES