Skip to main content
Journal of Tropical Medicine logoLink to Journal of Tropical Medicine
. 2013 Mar 24;2013:275253. doi: 10.1155/2013/275253

Post-Kala-Azar Dermal Leishmaniasis: A Paradigm of Paradoxical Immune Reconstitution Syndrome in Non-HIV/AIDS Patients

Eltahir Awad Gasim Khalil 1,2,3,*, Selma Abdelmoneim Khidir 1,2, Ahmed Mudawi Musa 1,2, Brema Younis Musa 1,2, Mona Elfaki Eltahir Elfaki 1,2, Abdelgadir Mohamed Yousif Elkadaru 1,4, Edward Zijlstra 1,2, Ahmed Mohamed El-Hassan 1,2
PMCID: PMC3619621  PMID: 23634148

Abstract

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a parasitic disease characterized by immune suppression. Successful treatment is usually followed by immune reconstitution and a dermatosis called post-Kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL). Recently, PKDL was described as one of the immune reconstitution syndromes (IRISs) in HIV/VL patients on HAART. This study aimed to present PKDL as a typical example of paradoxical IRIS in non-HIV/AIDS individuals. Published and new data on the pathogenesis and healing of PKDL was reviewed and presented. The data suggested that PKDL is a typical example of paradoxical IRIS, being a new disease entity that follows VL successful treatment and immune recovery. PKDL lesions are immune inflammatory in nature with granuloma, adequate response to immunochemotherapy, and an ensuing hypersensitivity reaction, the leishmanin skin test (LST). The data also suggested that the cytokine patterns of PKDL pathogenesis and healing are probably as follows: an active disease state dominated by IL-10 followed by spontaneous/treatment-induced IL-12 priming, IL-2 stimulation, and INF-γ production. INF-γ-activated macrophages eliminate the Leishmania parasites/antigen to be followed by LST conversion and healing. In conclusion, PKDL is a typical example of paradoxical IRIS in non-HIV/AIDS individuals with anti-inflammatory cytokine patterns that are superseded by treatment-induced proinflammatory cytokines and lesions healing.

1. Introduction

L. donovani infections are widely prevalent in East Africa and the Indian subcontinent manifesting as a wide spectrum of clinical phenotypes ranging from subclinical infections to a potentially fatal visceral disease. Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a parasitic febrile illness with a transient immune suppression state with leucopenia and increased IL-10 secretion [14]. In the HIV/AIDS era, VL is considered an opportunistic infection as evidenced by emergence of HIV/VL coinfections [510]. VL successful treatment is characterized by improvement of the leucopenia with a decline in CD4+ T cells and conversion in the leishmanin skin test (LST), a probable immunity surrogate marker. LST conversion probably indicates (re) constitution of transiently lost cell-mediated immunity against Leishmania antigens [1, 1116]. In VL, IL-4 stimulation with IL-10 overproduction leads to reciprocal inhibition of INF-γ production and polyclonal B-cells stimulation (Th2 immune response) [1720].

More than fifty percent of successfully treated Sudanese VL patients develop an inflammatory skin rash, called postkala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL). A number of hypotheses have been put forward to explain the aetiology of PKDL: undertreatment, UVB light exposure, and ethnicity [1, 2123]. LST conversion, high plasma and skin IL-10, high plasma levels of C-reactive protein and high TGF-β during VL predict development, progression and severity of PKDL [20, 24, 25]. PBMCs and skin immune responses of VL/PKDL patients are dichotomous. It start as Th2 immune response in VL patients, pass through a mixed Th1/Th2 stage to be followed by a pure Th1 response in cured patients [26, 27]. The majority of PKDL patients heal spontaneously, with persistence in 15% with chronic lesions that are probably a reservoir of infection [22, 28, 29]. Sodium stibogluconate (SSG), liposomal amphotericin B (Ambisome), and immunochemotherapy (SSG in combination with alum-precipitated autoclaved L. major vaccine) are available treatment modalities [22, 30, 31].

Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) is a well-documented phenomenon that follows immune reconstitution in HIV patients who have recently started HAART. It is a stereotyped immune inflammatory state that is characterized by transient worsening or appearance of new symptoms/signs following successful treatment. IRIS has been described in patients with parasitic, bacterial, viral and autoimmune diseases [3238]. CD4+ counts and preexisting opportunistic infection are reliable predictors of IRIS development [3941]. The immune pathology of IRIS is largely determined by the infecting organisms where CD8+ T cells dominate lesions of viral origins; granulomatous inflammation usually dominates IRIS of fungi, protozoa, and mycobacterial conditions [4250]. IRIS manifests when there is an abrupt shift from an anti-inflammatory and immuno-suppressive state mediated by TNF-α and IL-10 to a pro-inflammatory state mediated by variable levels of IL-2, IL-12 and IFN-γ [38, 5155]. An increase in CD4+/CD 8+ cells coupled with a reduction in Treg cells and an exaggerated cytokines response lead to initiation and progression of IRIS [5661].

Recently, PKDL was reported as an IRIS phenomenon from Africa and Europe in HIV/AIDS/VL co-infected patients [62, 63].

This study aimed to present PKDL as a form of paradoxical IRIS in non-HIV/AIDS patients with plethora of cytokines production, granuloma formation, and delayed-type skin hypersensitivity reaction (LST) without activation of existing opportunistic infection.

2. Materials and Methods

Archived supernatant samples from in vitro stimulated PBMCs of thirty PKDL patients were selected from the samples bank of the Institute of Endemic Diseases, University of Khartoum. PKDL patients were enrolled in an immunochemotherapy study and were randomized to two study arms: patients in group I received four intradermal doses of 100 μg alum-precipitated ALM + BCG (BCG 1/10th usual vaccine dose)/weekly plus daily sodium stibogluconate (SSG). Patients in group II received daily SSG plus four doses of the vaccine diluent (placebo). SSG was given intramuscularly/intravenously at a standard dose of 20 mg/Kg body weight/day [27].

The study protocol was reviewed and passed by the Ethics and Scientific Committees of the Institute of Endemic Diseases, University of Khartoum and the Ethics Committee of the Federal Ministry of Health, Khartoum. Samples were from patients who consented previously for the storage and use of their samples for further future testing. Patients were enrolled in the study based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria as described previously [27].

PKDL patients were subjected to physical examination, pregnancy testing, DAT/HIV serological test, skin biopsy, haematological and chemical tests, LST, ECG, and cytokines at screening (D2), during treatment (D0, D7, D14, and D21) and follow up (D30, D40, D60, and D90) periods.

PBMCs were harvested using the density gradient centrifugation and were counted using Trypan blue exclusion technique with a haemocytometer. PBMCs cultures were stimulated with soluble L. donovani antigen; phytohemagglutinin (PHA) as a positive contol, a third well was left without antigen or mitogen as a negative control. Supernatants were stored at −80°C for later analysis. IL-10 and IFN-γ were measured using double sandwich technique as per manufacturer's leaf-lets (R&D Systems, Germany). Results were previously reported [27]. IL-2 and IL-12 were measured using commercial kits (R&D Systems, Germany).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Group I (Alum/ALM Vaccine/BCG + SSG)

Total number of patients enrolled in this group was fifteen.

Five patients (data not shown on table) had low to undetectable IL-2, IL12, and IFN-γ levels on D-2 (screening) and D60 in response to soluble L. donovani antigen (sLA). The leishmanin skin tests (LST) changed significantly from nonreactive (induration = 00 mm) on D-2 to reactive (induration = 8.0 ± 1.4 mm) on D60. All five patients healed completely by D60 of followup. These patients most probably passed IL-12 priming, IL-2 stimulation and IFN-γ secretion (pro-inflammatory stage), and are now in leishmanin skin reactivity (memory) and lesion healing.

Four patients [nos. 107, 118, 116 and 129] showed low levels of IL-2 and IL-12 on D-2 and D60. Their IFN-γ was high on D-2 but dropped significantly on D60 in response to soluble L. donovani antigen (sLA). Three (3/4, 75%) were LST reactive on D-2 and remained the same on D60. The fourth patient converted in LST on D60 of follow up. The skin lesions of the four patients healed completely by D60. It is probable that these patients passed IL-12 priming/IL-2 stimulation and were seen in IFN-γ secretion (pro-inflammatory stage) where activated macrophages eliminated the Leishmania parasite/antigen paving the way for immune recovery (LST conversion) and healing (Table 1).

Table 1.

IL-2, IL-12, INF-γ, and IL-10 levels and LST induration (mm) in some patients in the study.

ID Day 2 Day 60 Treatment outcome
IL-2 IL-12 INF-γ IL-10 LST IL-2 IL-12 INF-γ IL-10 LST
110* 716 00 2505 16 00 135 4.8 438 22 07 Not healed
107* 55 2.9 2428 21 03 80 07 865 08 07 Healed
104* 1220 4.8 2349 38 03 1530 18 1342 47 11 Healed
116* 00 00 1016 33 08 34 03 968 81 10 Healed
105* 150 00 720 00 00 30 18 27 48 06 Healed
121* 00 08 00 00 00 20 04 531 22 07 Healed
123* 00 00 101 04 00 00 06 209 09 10 Healed
118* 00 02 427 12 08 00 4.8 85 36 09 Healed
129* 00 00 342 19 06 15 16.5 270 40 11 Healed
102* 00 1.8 74 00 00 42 4.8 874 35 07 Healed
112 970 06 2584 345 03 45 00 151 08 08 Healed
109 00 3.6 2584 09 00 25 05 626 17 08 Healed
108 155 00 2271 19 00 185 00 1231 00 05 Healed
106 45 4.8 2193 00 00 420 10.5 1342 29 00 Healed
103 00 3.6 1732 00 00 52 10 1342 12 06 Healed
101 25 18 1081 33 00 100 02 1342 32 00 Not healed
130 00 1.2 813 102 04 00 00 14 20 Not healed
115 00 00 118 113 08 23 18 704 62 12 Healed
127 00 6.0 00 46 00 00 12.9 430 65 07 Healed

*Group I patients (SSG + vaccine). IFN-γ, IL-2, Il-12, and IL-10 levels are expressed in pictogram/mL; leishmanin skin test (LST) induration is expressed in mm.

Three patients [nos. 121, 123 and 102] had low IL-2 and IL-12 on D-2 and D60, the IFN-γ levels increased significantly on D60 compared to screening levels in response to soluble L. donovani antigen (sLA) and were accompanied by LST conversion. All three patients healed completely by D60. These patients already passed IL-12 priming/IL-2 stimulation when screened and were slowly creeping into IFN-γ secretion (pro-inflammatory stage) and LST conversion and healing. Alternatively, these patients probably passed the IL-12 priming when screened and were not yet in the IL-2 stimulation. IL-2 stimulation was probably initiated later when immune-chemotherapy was started, leading to increased IFN-γ secretion and LST conversion and healing (Table 1).

Two patients [nos. 110, 105] had high IL-2 levels on D-2 that significantly drop on D60, while their IL-12 was low at both dates. Their IFN-γ levels dropped significantly on D60 compared to their D-2 levels in response to soluble L. donovani antigen (sLA). Both patients converted in LST by D60 of follow up. One patient healed while the other did not and had to receive Ambisome treatment for the lesions to heal. These patients passed the IL-12 priming stage and were seen at the IL-2 stimulation/IFN-γ secretion stage (pro-inflammatory stage) that is followed by IFN-γ reduction and LST conversion (Table 1).

One patient [nos. 104] had high IL-2 on D-2 that increased significantly on D60, while IL-12 was low through the follow up period. The IFN-γ level was markedly high on D-2 and dropped significantly on D60 with LST conversion. This patient completely healed on D60 of follow up. This patient was probably in IL-2 stimulation/IFN-γ secretion with overlap of LST conversion and healing (Table 1).

It is evident that all patients in the Alum/ALM vaccine + BCG group passed the anti-inflammatory stage when screened (low to absent IL-10), some were in the pro-inflammatory (IL-2/IL-12/IFN-γ secretion) with progression to LST conversion and healing by D60. Their LST mean induration was 8.3 ± 1.7 mm (median= 7 mm) and was significantly different from D-2 LST induration (P < 0.000). Patients passed a probably short lived IL-12 priming state when screened. Some were in the IL-2 stimulation/IFN-γ secretion/LST conversion/healing stage, while others had passed the IL-2 stimulation stage and were in IFN-γ/LST conversion/healing. Majority of patients (14/15; 93.3%) healed completely by D60. The SSG vaccine combination appears to be effective in eliminating the Leishmania parasite/antigen relieving the immune paresis that was preventing healing in these patients.

IL-10 levels were uniformly low in response to soluble L. donovani antigen (sLA) in all screening and follow up samples in all patients. This confirms that patients overcame the anti-inflammatory stage. The progression from an anti-inflammatory to a pro-inflammatory stage has been reported previously as a prerequisite for the development of IRIS in HIV/TB co-infected patients on HAART [5154].

3.2. Group II (SSG + Vaccine Diluent)

Total number of patients enrolled in this arm was fifteen.

Seven patients [nos. 109, 106, 103, 101, 130, 115 and 127] had low IL-2 and low IL-12 on D-2 with similar levels on D60 except for one patient [no. 106] who showed an increase in IL-2, a drop in IFN-γ with no LST conversion, and a complete healing by D60. Six patients of the above [6/7, 85.7%; nos. 109, 106, 103, 101, 130, and 115] had high IFN-γ levels on D-2, that is, in a pro-inflammatory stage. Five patients [5/7, 71.4%; nos. 109, 106, 103, 101, 130] showed marked to moderate drop in D-2 IFN-γ levels, while the other two [2/7, 28.6%; 115, 127] had a significant increase in IFN-γ on D60, that is, progressive IFN-γ secretion (anti-inflammatory stage). The majority of the seven patients [87.5%] were LST non-reactive on D-2 compared to 62.5% on D60. The majority (85.7%) of these patients healed completely by D60. It is probable that most of these patients passed the IL12 priming (?Transient IL-12 priming) and the IL-2 stimulation and were in the IFN-γ secretion stage when seen on D-2. On D60, some of these patients continued in IFN-γ secretion, while others dropped their IFN-γ with consequent LST conversion and healing (Table 1).

Six patients had low to undetectable IL-2, IL-12, and IFN-γ in response to soluble L. donovani antigen (sLA) on D-2with similar levels on D60. The majority (5/6; 83%) were LST non-reactive on D-2 and remained the same on D60 with only one healed patient. Another patient (1/6; 17%) who was strongly LST reactive on D-2 and remained the same on D60; he progressed to complete healing. The healed two patients probably passed the IL-12 priming, the IL-2 stimulation and IFN-γ production and were in LST conversion status with complete cure. The nonhealing 4 patients were probably in an “immune paresis” state and were not able to mount IL-12 priming, IL-2, and IFN-γ production/LST conversion and so exhibited no healing (?high leishmania antigen load). These patients healed completely with Ambisome treatment. Failure to progress to IL-2 priming and IL-12/IFN-γ secretion in these patients probably indicates a degree of parasite unresponsiveness to SSG leading to persistence of Leishmania parasite/antigen and the observed immune paresis as evidenced by lack of LST conversion. Ambisome was successful in overcoming the parasite unresponsiveness, which is indicated by lesions healing.

Patient no. 112 had low IL-12, high IL-2, and high IFN-γ and LST non-reactivity on D-2. On D60, the IFN-γ and IL-2 drop was accompanied by LST conversion and healing. This patient probably passed IL-12 priming and was in IL-2 stimulation and IFN-γ secretion when screened. The IFN-γ drop, LST conversion and healing were achieved during the follow up period. This patient findings demonstrate the mirror-image pattern exhibited by IL-2 and IFN-γ levels.

Patient no. 108 had low IL-12, high IL2/IFN-γ on D2, with IL-2 remaining high on D60 with a drop in IFN-γ level LST conversion and healing. The high level of IL-2 with low IFN-γ levels and LST conversion and healing needs explanation!

IL-10 levels in response to soluble L. donovani antigen (sLA) were uniformly low in all screening and follow up samples, that is, patients passed the anti-inflammatory state when screened. These patients overcame the anti-inflammatory stage, progressed to a pro-inflammatory in line with previous data on IRIS in HIV co-infected patients on HAART [5154].

Some of the patients in the SSG/vaccine diluent were in a state of immune paresis (high leishmania antigen load) and were unable to mount an IL-12 priming and IL-2/IFN-γ secretion/LST conversion and healing. As suggested previously, a state of parasite SSG-unresponsiveness could be a contributory factor in patients lingering in an immune paresis stage. Ambisome treatment eliminated the parasite with reduction in Leishmania antigenic load putting patients on the way to recovery. Others in this group showed the typical natural history of PKDL healing, that is, passing IL-12 priming and were seen in the IL-2/IFN-γ secretion that was followed by LST conversion and healing.

Data from this study showed the clear dichotomy of immune response in PKDL patients as was previously reported [64]. On the other hand, the levels of IL-2 and IFN-γ more or less mirror-image each other.

Case reports from Africa and Europe introduced PKDL as an immune reconstitution phenomenon in HIV/VL co-infected patients at the start of HAART [62, 63]. In this study we attempted to prove that PKDL is an IRIS phenomenon that develops in VL patients who go through a transient stage of immune depression. PKDL develops as a new disease entity with symptoms and signs that are mainly of skin origin and that are different from VL. Cured VL patients become immune competent as evidenced by conversion of the LST at six months after treatment, around the same time of PKDL development [29]. Healing of PKDL lesions is a function of a change of immune responses from a mixed Th1/Th2 state (anti-inflammatory) to a pure Th1 one (pro-inflammatory). Healing of skin lesions starts at the cellular level by antigen presentation, followed by IL-12 priming, and IL-2 secretion which facilitates expansion of the Th1 population and IFN-γ and TNF-β secretion. It is logical to assume that the sequence of events in PKDL healing is as follows: drug-induced parasite killing, antigen load reduction, IL-12 priming followed by IL-2 secretion that in turn induces IFN-γ secretion which augments the killing potential of the macrophages with production of nitric oxide and reactive oxygen intermediates. Eventually, inflammation decreases and healing occurs with production of memory cells and a lifelong LST reactivity status. The data also points to the fact that the cytokine patterns of PKDL healing are stereotyped and the differences between drug-treated (SSG; Ambisome), and immunochemotherapy-induced patterns are only quantitative. IL-2 is most probably the initiating cytokine for the healing process in PKDL, a finding that may have future therapeutic implications.

In conclusion, PKDL is a form of paradoxical IRIS that emerges as a new disease entity following successful VL treatment and immune recovery. PKDL skin lesions are immune inflammatory in nature and respond adequately to immuno-chemotherapy. Like IRIS, PKDL is an immune-mediated phenomenon with increased activation from antigenic exposure, granuloma formation, and skin hypersensitivity reaction (LST conversion). Different Th1 and Th2 cytokines play important roles in PKDL pathogenesis and healing. IL-2 plays a pivotal role in PKDL healing process.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interests.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their thanks and gratitude to the staff of the Tropical Diseases Hospital, Omdurman, for their considerable help. The team received financial support from the Institute of Endemic Diseases, University of Khartoum.

References

  • 1.Zijlstra EE, El Hassan AM. Leishmaniasis in Sudan. Visceral leishmaniasis. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2001;95:S27–S58. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(01)90218-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Croft SL, Sundar S, Fairlamb AH. Drug resistance in leishmaniasis. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2006;19(1):111–126. doi: 10.1128/CMR.19.1.111-126.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hailu A, Musa A, Wasunna M, et al. Geographical variation in the response of visceral leishmaniasis to paromomycin in East Africa: a multicentre, open-label, randomized trial. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2010;4(10, article e709) doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sinha PK, Roddy P, Palma PP, et al. Effectiveness and safety of liposomal amphotericin b for visceral leishmaniasis under routine program conditions in Bihar, India. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2010;83(2):357–364. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.10-0156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Desjeux P. Leishmania/HIV co-infections. Africa Health. 1995;18(1):20–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mathur P, Samantaray JC, Vajpayee M, Samanta P. Visceral leishmaniasis/human immunodeficiency virus co-infection in India: the focus of two epidemics. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2006;55, part 7:919–922. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.46574-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ezra N, Ochoa MT, Craft N. Human immunodeficiency virus and leishmaniasis. Journal of Global Infectious Diseases. 2010;2(3):248–257. doi: 10.4103/0974-777X.68528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hurissa Z, Gebre-Silassie S, Hailu W, et al. Clinical characteristics and treatment outcome of patients with visceral leishmaniasis and HIV co-infection in northwest Ethiopia. Tropical Medicine and International Health. 2010;15(7):848–855. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2010.02550.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhou J, Sirisanthana T, Kiertiburanakul S, et al. Trends in CD4 counts in HIV-infected patients with HIV viral load monitoring while on combination antiretroviral treatment: results from The TREAT Asia HIV Observational Database. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2010;10, article 361 doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nascimento ET, Moura MLN, Queiroz JW, et al. The emergence of concurrent HIV-1/AIDS and visceral leishmaniasis in Northeast Brazil. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2011;105(5):298–300. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2011.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Carvalho EM, Teixeira RS, Johnson WD. Cell-mediated immunity in American visceral leishmaniasis: reversible immunosuppression during acute infection. Infection and Immunity. 1981;33(2):498–502. doi: 10.1128/iai.33.2.498-500.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Haldar JP, Ghose S, Saha KC, Ghose AC. Cell-mediated immune response in Indian kala azar and post-kala azar dermal leishmaniasis. Infection and Immunity. 1983;42(2):702–707. doi: 10.1128/iai.42.2.702-707.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Carvalho EM, Badaro R, Reed SG, Jones TC, Johnson WD. Absence of gamma interferon and interleukin 2 production during active visceral leishmaniasis. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1985;76(6):2066–2069. doi: 10.1172/JCI112209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Weigle KA, Valderrama L, Arias AL, Santrich C, Saravia NG. Leishmanin skin test standardization and evaluation of safety, dose, storage, longevity of reaction and sensitization. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 1991;44(3):260–271. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1991.44.260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zijlstra EE, El Hassan AM. Leishmanin and tuberculin sensitivity in leishmaniasis in the Sudan, with special reference to kala-azar. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 1993;87(4):425–427. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(93)90024-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Khalil EAG, El Hassan AM, Zijlstra EE, et al. Autoclaved Leishmania major vaccine for prevention of visceral leishmaniasis: a randomised, double-blind, BCG-controlled trial in Sudan. The Lancet. 2000;356(9241):1565–1569. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)03128-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Harith AE, Kolk AHJ, Kager PA, et al. Evaluation of a newly developed direct agglutination test (DAT) for serodiagnosis and sero-epidemiological studies of visceral leishmaniasis: comparison with IFAT and ELISA. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 1987;81(4):603–606. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(87)90423-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ghalib HW, Piuvezam MR, Skeiky YAW, et al. Interleukin 10 production correlates with pathology in human Leishmania donovani infections. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1993;92(1):324–329. doi: 10.1172/JCI116570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nylén S, Sacks D. Interleukin-10 and the pathogenesisof human visceral leishmaniasis. Trends in Immunology. 2007;28:378–382. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2007.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Saha S, Mondal S, Ravindran R, et al. IL-10- and TGF-β-mediated susceptibility in kala-azar and post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis: the significance of amphotericin B in the control of Leishmania donovani infection in India. Journal of Immunology. 2007;179(8):5592–5603. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.8.5592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ismail A. Immune responses and immunopathology of post kala-azar dermal Leishmaniasis [Ph.D. thesis] Copenhagen, Denmark: University of Copenhagen; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zijlstra EE, Musa AM, Khalil EAG, El Hassan IM, El Hassan AM. Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2003;3(2):87–98. doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(03)00517-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ismail A, Khalil EAG, Musa AM, et al. The pathogenesis of post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis from the field to the molecule: does ultraviolet light (UVB) radiation play a role? Medical Hypotheses. 2006;66(5):993–999. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2005.03.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gasim S, El Hassan AM, Khalil EAG, et al. High levels of plasma IL-10 and expression of IL-10 by keratinocytes during visceral leishmaniasis predict subsequent development of post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis. Clinical and Experimental Immunology. 1998;111:64–69. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.1998.00468.x. Erratum in: Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 112, pp. 574, 1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gasim S, Theander TG, El Hassan AM. High levels of C-reactive protein in the peripheral blood during visceral leishmaniasis predict subsequent development of post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis. Acta Tropica. 2000;75(1):35–38. doi: 10.1016/s0001-706x(99)00089-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kamil AA, Khalil EAG, Musa AM, et al. Alum-precipitated autoclaved Leishmania major plus bacille Calmette-Guérrin, a candidate vaccine for visceral leishmaniasis: safety, skin-delayed type hypersensitivity response and dose finding in healthy volunteers. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2003;97(3):365–368. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(03)90171-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Musa AM, Khalil EAG, Mahgoub FAE, et al. Immunochemotherapy of persistent post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis: a novel approach to treatment. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2008;102(1):58–63. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2007.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.El Hassan AM, Khalil EAG. Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis: does it play a role in the transmission of Leishmania donovani in the Sudan? Tropical Medicine and International Health. 2001;6(9):743–744. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2001.00776.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Musa AM, Khalil EAG, Raheem MA, et al. The natural history of Sudanese post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis: clinical, immunological and prognostic features. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology. 2002;96(8):765–772. doi: 10.1179/000349802125002211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Musa AM, Khalil EAG, Mahgoub FA, Elkadaru AMY, El Hassan AM, Hamad S. Efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) in the treatment of persistent post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology. 2005;99(6):563–569. doi: 10.1179/136485905X514127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Musa AM, Khalil EAG, Ismail A, et al. Safety, immunogenicity and possible efficacy of immunochemotherapy of persistent post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) Sudanese Journal of Dermatology. 2005;3:62–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Shelburne SA, III, Hamill RJ, Rodriguez-Barradas MC, et al. Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome: emergence of a unique syndrome during highly active antiretroviral therapy. Medicine. 2002;81(3):213–227. doi: 10.1097/00005792-200205000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.French MA. Disorders of immune reconstitution in patients with HIV infection responding to antiretroviral therapy. Current HIV/AIDS Reports. 2007;4(1):16–21. doi: 10.1007/s11904-007-0003-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bicanic T, Meintjes G, Rebe K, et al. Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis: a prospective study. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2009;51(2):130–134. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181a56f2e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Elliott JH, Vohith K, Saramony S, et al. Immunopathogenesis and diagnosis of tuberculosis and tuberculosis- associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome during early antiretroviral therapy. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2009;200(11):1736–1745. doi: 10.1086/644784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Elston JWT, Thaker H. Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. International Journal of STD and AIDS. 2009;20(4):221–224. doi: 10.1258/ijsa.2008.008449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.French MA. Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome: a reappraisal. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2009;48(1):101–107. doi: 10.1086/595006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.van Tieu H, Ananworanich J, Avihingsanon A, et al. Immunologic markers as predictors of tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in HIV and tuberculosis coinfected persons in thailand. AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses. 2009;25(11):1083–1089. doi: 10.1089/aid.2009.0055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.French MA, Lenzo N, John M, et al. Immune restoration disease after the treatment of imrrmnodeficient THIV-infected patients with highly active antiretroviral therapy. HIV Medicine. 2000;1(2):107–115. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-1293.2000.00012.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Shelburne SA, Montes M, Hamill RJ. Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome: more answers, more questions. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2006;57(2):167–170. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Amerson EH, Maurer TA. Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome and tropical dermatoses. Dermatologic Clinics. 2011;29(1):39–43. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2010.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Blanche P, Gombert B, Rivoal O, Abad S, Salmon D, Brezin A. Uveitis due to Leishmania major as part of HAART-induced immune restitution syndrome in a patient with AIDS. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2002;34(9):1279–1280. doi: 10.1086/338720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mutimer HP, Akatsuka Y, Manley T, et al. Association between immune recovery uveitis and a diverse intraocular cytomegalovirus-specific cytotoxic T cell response. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2002;186(5):701–705. doi: 10.1086/342044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Miller RF, Isaacson PG, Hall-Craggs M, et al. Cerebral CD8+ lymphocytosis in HIV-1 infected patients with immune restoration induced by HAART. Acta Neuropathologica. 2004;108(1):17–23. doi: 10.1007/s00401-004-0852-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Gray F, Bazille C, Adle-Biassette H, Mikol J, Moulignier A, Scaravilli F. Central nervous system immune reconstitution disease in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome patients receiving highly active antiretroviral treatment. Journal of NeuroVirology. 2005;11(supplement 3):16–22. doi: 10.1080/13550280500511741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lortholary O, Fontanet A, Mémain N, Martin A, Sitbon K, Dromer F. Incidence and risk factors of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome complicating HIV-associated cryptococcosis in France. AIDS. 2005;19(10):1043–1049. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000174450.70874.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Phillips P, Bonner S, Gataric N, et al. Nontuberculous mycobacterial immune reconstitution syndrome in HIV-infected patients: spectrum of disease and long-term folow-up. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2005;41(10):1483–1497. doi: 10.1086/497269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Breton G, Adle-Biassette H, Therby A, et al. Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in HIV-infected patients with disseminated histoplasmosis. AIDS. 2006;20(1):119–121. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000199014.66139.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Batista MD, Porro AM, Maeda SM, et al. Leprosy reversal reaction as immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in patients with AIDS. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2008;46(6):e56–e60. doi: 10.1086/528864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Tan DBA, Yong YK, Tan HY, et al. Immunological profiles of immune restoration disease presenting as mycobacterial lymphadenitis and cryptococcal meningitis. HIV Medicine. 2008;9(5):307–316. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2008.00565.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Tamburini J, Grimaldi D, Chiche JD, Bricaire F, Bossi P. Cytokine pattern in Kaposi’s sarcoma associated with immune restoration disease in HIV and tuberculosis co-infected patients. AIDS. 2007;21(14):1980–1983. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3282efa62c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Morlese JF, Orkin CM, Abbas R, et al. Plasma IL-6 as a marker of mycobacterial immune restoration disease in HIV-1 infection. AIDS. 2003;17(9):1411–1413. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200306130-00025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Seddiki N, Sasson SC, Santner-Nanan B, et al. Proliferation of weakly suppressive regulatory CD4+ T cells is associated with over-active CD4+ T-cell responses in HIV-positive patients with mycobacterial immune restoration disease. European Journal of Immunology. 2009;39(2):391–403. doi: 10.1002/eji.200838630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Sun HY, Singh N. Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in non-HIV immunocompromised patients. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases. 2009;22(4):394–402. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e32832d7aff. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Worsley CM, Suchard MS, Stevens WS, van Rie A, Murdoch DM. Multi-analyte profiling of ten cytokines in South African HIV-infected patients with Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome (IRIS) AIDS Research and Therapy. 2010;7, article 36 doi: 10.1186/1742-6405-7-36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Puthanakit T, Oberdorfer P, Punjaisee S, Wannarit P, Sirisanthana T, Sirisanthana V. Immune reconstitution syndrome due to bacillus Calmette-Guérin after initiation of antiretroviral therapy in children with HIV infection. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2005;41(7):1049–1052. doi: 10.1086/433177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Matsuzaki G, Umemura M. Interleukin-17 as an effector molecule of innate and acquired immunity against infections. Microbiology and Immunology. 2007;51(12):1139–1147. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2007.tb04008.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Scriba TJ, Kalsdorf B, Abrahams DA, et al. Distinct, specific IL-17- and IL-22-producing CD4+ T cell subsets contribute to the human anti-mycobacterial immune response. Journal of Immunology. 2008;180(3):1962–1970. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.3.1962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Tappuni AR. Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. Advances in Dental Research. 2011;23(1):90–96. doi: 10.1177/0022034511399915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Lawn SD, Bekker LG, Miller RF. Immune reconstitution disease associated with mycobacterial infections in HIV-infected individuals receiving antiretrovirals. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2005;5(6):361–373. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(05)70140-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Antonelli LRV, Mahnke Y, Hodge JN, et al. Elevated frequencies of highly activated CD4+ T cells in HIV+ patients developing immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. Blood. 2010;116(19):3818–3827. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-05-285080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Tadesse A, Hurissa Z. Leishmaniasis (PKDL) as a case of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) in HIV-positive patient after initiation of anti-retroviral therapy (ART) Ethiopian Medical Journal. 2009;47(1):77–79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Antinori S, Longhi E, Bestetti G, et al. Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis as an immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in a patient with acquired immune deficiency syndrome. British Journal of Dermatology. 2007;157(5):1032–1036. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08157.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Khalil EAG, Ayed NB, Musa AM, et al. Dichotomy of protective cellular immune responses to human visceral leishmaniasis. Clinical and Experimental Immunology. 2005;140(2):349–353. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2005.02768.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Tropical Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES