Skip to main content
The Journal of Headache and Pain logoLink to The Journal of Headache and Pain
. 2013 Feb 21;14(Suppl 1):P184. doi: 10.1186/1129-2377-14-S1-P184

Prevention of migraine by supraorbital transcutaneous neurostimulation using the Cefaly® device (PREMICE): a multi-centre, randomized, sham-controlled trial

J Schoenen 1,, B Vandersmissen 2, S Jeangette 2, L Herroelen 2, M Vandenheede 2, P Gerard 1, D Magis 1
PMCID: PMC3620126

Introduction

Subjects who have frequent migraine attacks (≥ 2 / month) are in need of a preventive anti-migraine treatment. Available preventive drugs have incomplete efficacy and/or unpleasant side effects.

Purpose

Supraorbital transcutaneous neurostimulation (STNS) has shown encouraging results for migraine prevention in pilot studies and has no side effects [1-3]. We assessed efficacy and safety of STNS in migraine prophylaxis with the Cefaly® device in a multicentre, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial.

Methods

Five Belgian tertiary headache clinics participated to the study. After a 1-month run-in, patients with ≥ 2 migraine attacks/month were randomized to verum or sham stimulation, and applied the Cefaly® device daily for 20 minutes during 3 months. Primary outcome measures were change in monthly migraine days and 50% responder rate, i.e. the percentage of subjects having a ≥ 50% reduction of monthly migraine days. Patients and enrolling neurologists were blinded from the randomization.

Results

Sixty-seven patients were randomized and included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Between run-in and 3rd month of treatment the mean number of migraine days decreased significantly in the verum (4.88 vs 6.94; p=0.023), but not in the sham group (6.22 vs 6.54; p=0.608). The 50% responder rate was significantly greater (p=0.023) in the verum (38.1%) than in the sham group (12.1 %). Monthly migraine attacks (p=0.044), monthly headache days (p=0.041) and monthly acute anti-migraine drug intake (p=0.007) were also significantly reduced in the verum but not in the sham group. There were no adverse events in either group.

Conclusions

STNS with the Cefaly® device is effective as a preventive therapy for migraine. The therapeutic gain (26%) is within the range of those reported for other preventive drug and non-drug anti-migraine treatments [4,5], and the safety profile is excellent.

Conflicts of interest

LH: Allergan. JS: ATI Redwood California, St Jude Medical USA, Allergan USA, ATI USA, Medtronic USA and Cyberonics USA.

References

  1. Reed KL, Black SB, Banta CJ 2nd, Will KR. Combined occipital and supraorbital neurostimulation for the treatment of chronic migraine headaches: initial experience. Cephalalgia. 2010;14(3):260–271. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2009.01996.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Solomon S, Guglielmo KM. Treatment of headache by transcutaneous electrical stimulation. Headache. 1985;14(1):12–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1985.hed2501012.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gérardy PY, Fabry D, Fumal A, Schoenen J. A pilot study on supra-orbital surface electrotherapy in migraine. Cephalalgia. 2009;14:134. [Google Scholar]
  4. Mulleners WM, Chronicle EP. Anticonvulsants in migraine prophylaxis: a Cochrane review. Cephalalgia. 2008;14(6):585–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01571.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Linde K, Rossnagel K. Propranolol for migraine prophylaxis. Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) 2004. p. CD003225. [DOI] [PubMed]

Articles from The Journal of Headache and Pain are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES