Abstract
UDP-N-acetylglucosamine (UDP-GlcNAc) is a direct glycosyl donor of linker unit (L-Rhamnose-D-GlcNAc) and an essential precursor of peptidoglycan in mycobacteria. Phosphoglucosamine mutase (GlmM) is involved in the formation of glucosamine-1-phosphate from glucosamine-6-phosphate, the second step in UDP-GlcNAc biosynthetic pathway. We have demonstrated that GlmM protein is essential for the growth of M. smegmatis. To facilitate the analysis of the GlmM protein function in mycobacteria, a tetracycline inducible M. smegmatis glmM gene knockdown strain was constructed by using an antisense RNA technology. After induction with 20 ng/ml tetracycline, the expression of GlmM protein in glmM gene knockdown strain was significantly decreased, resulting in a decline of cell growth. The morphological changes of glmM gene knockdown strain induced with 20 ng/ml tetracycline have been observed by scanning electron microscope and transmission electron microscope. Furthermore, insufficient GlmM protein reduced the biofilm formation and increased the sensitivity to isoniazid and ethambutol in M. smegmatis, indicating that GlmM protein had effect on the biofilm formation and the senstivity to some anti-tuberculosis drugs targeting the cell wall. These results provide a new insight on GlmM functions in mycobacteria, suggesting that GlmM could be a potential target for development of new anti-tuberculosis drug.
Introduction
Tuberculosis, an infectious disease caused by M. tuberculosis, remains an important problem the world is facing due to the alarming increase of people living with HIV and the emergence of multi- and extensively drug-resistant strains [1], [2]. Thus, new drugs against this stubborn disease are urgently needed. As far as we know, M. tuberculosis has a unique and complex cell wall structure which plays essential roles in controlling bacterial growth, surviving in the infected host, and the immunologic response [3], [4], [5]. Due to the importance of cell wall to M. tuberculosis viability, the enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of cell wall are potential targets for anti-tuberculosis drugs.
The cell wall architecture of mycobacteria amounts to a massive ‘‘core’’ comprised of peptidoglycan covalently attached via a linker unit (L-Rhamnose-D-GlcNAc) to a linear galactofuran, in turn attached to several strands of a highly branched arabinofuran, in turn attached to mycolic acids [4]. UDP-N-acetylglucosamine (UDP-GlcNAc) is a directly glycosyl donor of linker unit, which is involved in the attachment of galactofuran and peptidoglycan, and it is also the precursor of peptidoglycan [6], [7]. In bacteria, UDP-GlcNAc is synthesized from the glycolytic intermediate D-fructose-6-phosphate by four successive reactions catalyzed by three enzymes: glucosamine-6-phosphate synthase (GlmS), phosphoglucosamine mutase (GlmM) and the bifunctional enzyme glucosamine-1-phosphate acetyltransferase/N-acetylglucosamine-1-phosphate uridyltransferase (GlmU) [6], [8], [9], [10], [11]. Interestingly, GlmM protein which catalyses the interconversion of glucosamine-6-phosphate and glucosamine-1-phosphate is unique to prokaryotes.
M. smegmatis, a fast growing and non-pathogenic species which was homologous with M. tuberculosis, was commonly used as a surrogate host for pathogenic M. tuberculosis. We had recently constructed a conditional M. smegmatis glmM gene knockout strain and confirmed that glmM gene was essential for the growth of M. smegmatis [12], indicating that GlmM could be used as a potential target of anti-tuberculosis drugs. Therefore, the biological functions of GlmM enzyme in mycobacteria need to be further illustrated.
Inducible gene expression systems are powerful tools for studying gene functions in bacteria, especially the essential genes which would lead a lethal phenotype when they were inactivated. Blokpoel et al had reported a tetracycline inducible system for use in mycobacteria and the application of this system for conditional gene silencing had been demonstrated [13]. The tetracycline inducible express vector pMind is a mycobacterial shuttle plasmid which has been sub-cloned with a tetRO operator-repressor region from Corynebacterium glutamicum TetZ [13]. The target gene is inversely inserted into the downstream of tetRO and the plasmid will express antisense RNA in the response of tetracycline [13]. The expressed antisense RNA will base pair with the target mRNA, thereby preventing ribosome binding and target protein translation [14]. This provided us a genetic approach to characterize essential genes whose deletion would cause death of the bacteria.
To gain insights into the glmM functions in mycobacteria, a tetracycline inducible antisense gene expression system was constructed to down regulate the glmM gene in M. smegmatis. The cellular growth of M. smegmatis glmM gene knockdown strain was monitored by optical density and colony forming units. The GlmM protein expression in M. smegmatis glmM gene knockdown strain was detected by anti-GlmM polyclonal antibody we prepared in our lab. The morphology of M. smegmatis glmM gene knockdown strain was also observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM). In addition, the biofilm formation and antimicrobial susceptibility of glmM gene knockdown strain were detected to further elucidate the biological roles of GlmM protein in M. smegmatis.
Materials and Methods
Bacterial strains, plasmids, and culture conditions
The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. NovaBlue strain was grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium at 37°C routinely. M. smegmatis mc2155 strain was grown in LB broth containing 0.05% Tween 80 or on LB agar at 37°C routinely. M. smegmatis mc2155 was used for cloning glmM gene (420 bp) and constructing a M. smegmatis glmM gene knockdown strain. Antibiotics were added at the following final concentrations: ampicillin (Amp), 100 µg/ml; kanamycin (Kan), 50 µg/ml for E. coli and 25 µg/ml for M. smegmatis.
Table 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study.
Strains/Plasmids | Description | Source |
Strains | ||
E. coli NovaBlue | Used for cloning and propagation of plasmids | Novagen |
M. smegmatis mc2155 | Used as a DNA template to amplify DNA fragment of M. smegmatis glmM (420 bp) | ATCC |
M. smegmatis AS | M. smegmatis mc2155 carrying pMind-glmM-420-AS | This study |
Plasmids | ||
pMD18-T | Carries ampR gene; used for cloning PCR product with A at 3′ ends | Takara |
pMind | Carries kanR gene; used for expression of glmM antisense mRNA | [13] |
pMD-glmM-420 | The DNA fragment (420 bp) of M. smegmatis glmM was cloned to the EcoRV site of pMD18-T | This work |
pMind-glmM-420-AS | The DNA fragment (420 bp) of M. smegmatis glmM in pMD-glmM-420 was cloned to the SpeI and NdeI sites of pMind | This work |
Ethics Statement
All animal experimental procedures were conducted in conformity with institutional guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals in Dalian Medical University, and conformed to the National Institutes of Health Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of Dalian Medical University. Permit Number: SYXK (Liao) 2008-0002.
Construction of glmM gene knockdown strain, M. smegmatis AS
The DNA fragment (420 bp) of M. smegmatis glmM gene in 5′ end was amplified from M. smegmatis mc2155 genomic DNA by PCR using primers glmM1 (5′-TTCATATGGAGTTCCTCGATGCGGTC-3′, underlined is NdeI site) and glmM2 (5′-TTACTAGTATGGCTCGACTGTTCGGC-3′, underlined is SpeI site) respectively. The PCR product (420 bp) was ligated into pMD18-T vector to generate pMD-glmM-420 plasmid (Table 1) and confirmed by DNA sequencing. The DNA fragment (420 bp) of glmM was ligated into SpeI and NdeI sites of pMind yielding pMind-glmM-420-AS (Table 1).
M. smegmatis mc2155 electro-competent cells were prepared as described [15]. The pMind-glmM-420-AS plasmid was electroporated into mc2155 competent cells by Electroporator 2510 (Eppendorf), yielding a glmM gene knockdown strain, M. smegmatis AS.
Growth of M. smegmatis AS strain
The cellular growth of M. smegmatis AS strain was monitored by optical density (OD) and colony forming units (CFU). One colony of M. smegmatis AS strain was inoculated into 5 ml of LB broth containing 0.05% Tween 80 and Kan at 37°C. When OD600 reached to 0.5, 10 µl of culture was inoculated into 20 ml LB broth containing 0.05% Tween 80 and Kan at 37°C. The tetracycline at different concentrations (0 ng/ml, 10 ng/ml, 20 ng/ml, 30 ng/ml and 50 ng/ml) was added into the cultures as inducer. The OD600 of the cultures was monitored at interval of 12 h. For CFU determinations (taken at the same time points), dilutions were spread on LB agar plates. The plates were incubated at 37°C before CFU were counted. The growth of wild type mc2155 strain with different concentrations of tetracycline was also performed as described.
Preparation of polyclonal antibody against M. smegmatis GlmM protein
Anti-GlmM polyclonal antibody was prepared by immunizing method using purified M. smegmatis GlmM protein. M. smegmatis GlmM protein was purified as described previously [12]. The GlmM protein (100 µg) in 100 µl physiological saline was emulsified with 100 µl of the Freund's incomplete adjuvant (Thermo Scientific). Eight 8-weeks old female BALB/c mice housed in the Animal Center of Dalian Medical University were used for preparation of polyclonal antibody. Before inoculation of antigen, 500 µl of blood was collected from the orbital venous plexus of mice for preparing the pre-immunized-serum as a negative control. On the 1st, 10th, 17th day, the emulsified GlmM protein (100 µg) was injected intradermally on 3 parts of the mouse body. The blood was collected from the orbital venous plexus of mice on the 24th day. Blood samples were kept at 4°C for 4 h for coagulation. The anti-serum was separated by centrifugation at 4°C, 10000 g for 10 min and stored at −80°C. Western blot and ELISA was performed to evaluate the specificity and titers of produced polyclonal antibody.
Expression of GlmM protein in M. smegmatis AS strain
Western blot was used to analyze the expression levels of GlmM protein in wild type mc2155 strain and M. smegmatis AS strain. M. smegmatis AS strain was grown in 100 ml LB broth containing 0.05% Tween 80 and Kan at 37°C. The tetracycline at different concentrations (0 ng/ml, 20 ng/ml) was added into the medium at the beginning of incubation. The cells were harvested after incubation for 36 h and resuspended in 3 ml lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 500 mM NaCl and 20% glycerol) with 1 mM phenylmethyl-sulphonyl fluoride followed by sonication. The samples were centrifuged at 20000 g for 30 min, and the supernatant was collected for Western blot analysis. The supernatants of wild type mc2155 strain induced with different concentrations of tetracycline (0 ng/ml, 20 ng/ml) were also collected as described.
The same amount of soluble protein in supernatant from different samples were run on 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane in blotting buffer (20 mM Tris-base, 150 mM glycine and 20% methanol). The membrane was blocked with 1% BSA in TBST buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20) and incubated with anti-GlmM polyclonal antibody at 1∶5000 dilution followed by washing with TBST. The membrane was incubated with antimouse-IgG-AP conjugate and the protein band was visualized in BCIP/NBT solution.
Morphology of M. smegmatis AS strain
M. smegmatis AS strain induced with or without 20 ng/ml tetracycline was grown in 20 ml LB broth at 37°C. The cells were harvested after incubation for 36 h. The cell pellet was washed three times in the 0.1 M Phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde followed by fixation with 1% OsO4. The cells were then dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol (20, 40, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100%). The cells for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observation were critical point dried and applied to a silicon wafer slide and coated by gold [16]. The cells were then observed by using a JSM-6360 scanning electron microscope (JEOL). The cells for transmission electron microscope (TEM) observation were embedded in the Epon 812 embedding kit and cut into ultrathin sections. The sections were double-stained with uranyl acetate and lead nitrate and then observed using a JEM-2000EX TEM (JEOL). The SEM observations of wild type mc2155 strain induced with 20 ng/ml tetracycline were also performed as described.
Determination of biofilm formation
Wild type mc2155 strain and M. smegmatis AS strain were inoculated in LB broth containing 0.05% Tween 80 at 37°C. When OD600 reached to 0.5, the cells were diluted 1∶1000 in M63 medium supplemented with 0.5% Casamino acids, 1 mM MgSO4 and 0.7 mM CaCl2. The tetracycline at different concentrations (0 ng/ml, 20 ng/ml) was also added into the medium. The experiment was carried out in triplicate. The culture of 150 µl was added to each well in a 96-well polystyrene microtiter plate. The plates were incubated at 30°C for 5 days without disturbance. The wells were rinsed three times with physiological saline, and 150 µl of 1% crystal violet was added for stain. The plates were incubated at room temperature for 15 min and rinsed with water three times. Quantitation of biofilm formation was performed by extracting crystal violet associated with biofilm by 95% ethanol and measuring OD570.
Antimicrobial susceptibilities of M. smegmatis AS strain
The susceptibilities of wild type mc2155 strain and M. smegmatis AS strain to various antibiotics were determined by using the resazurin reduction microplate assay (REMA) method [17] with modification. Resazurin, a blue and nonfluorescent indicator dye, is converted to resorufin (pink and highly fluorescent) via the reduction reactions of metabolically active cells. The amount of fluorescence produced can be detected at 590 nm by a microplate reader, and it is proportional to the number of living cell.
Five first-line anti-tuberculosis drugs were tested: isoniazid (INH), rifampin (RMP), streptomycin (STR), ethambutol (EMB) and pyrazinamide (PZA). INH, STR, EMB and PZA were dissolved in sterilized water, and RMP was dissolved in methanol. Stock solutions were diluted in LB broth to two times of the maximal desired concentration. A sterile 96-well microtiter plate was used to perform MABA. Sterilized distilled water of 200 µl was added into all outer perimeter wells to prevent dehydration during incubation. LB broth (50 µl) was added into other wells in columns 3 to 10, and 50 µl of 2× drug solution was added into wells in columns 2 and 3. A serial 2-fold dilution of drug from columns 3 to 10 was performed directly in the plate. The wells in column 11 were filled with 50 µl LB broth served as drug-free controls. The final concentration ranges of drugs were as follows: INH 0.039–10 µg/ml, RMP 0.39–100 µg/ml, STR 0.05–12.5 µg/ml, EMB 0.01–2.5 µg/ml, PZA 0.002–0.5 mg/ml.
M. smegmatis AS strain was inoculated in LB broth containing 0.05% Tween 80 at 37°C. When OD600 reached to 0.5, the cells were diluted 1∶2000 in LB broth containing 0.05% Tween 80, and 50 µl dilutions with or without 20 ng/ml tetracycline were added to each well. The plates were covered and sealed with parafilm and incubated at 37°C. After 30 h of incubation, 100 µl of freshly prepared 1∶1 mixture of 10× Resazurin (Sigma) and 10% Tween 80 were added to each well and the plates were incubated for an additional 5 h at 37°C. A color change from blue to pink indicated cell growth, and the fluorescence of the resazurin metabolite resorufin was measured at OD590 by using Multiskan FC microplate reader (Thermo Scientific). The MIC was defined visually as the lowest drug concentration at which there was no color change from blue to pink and confirmed by the level of fluorescence measured by the microplate reader. The susceptibilities of wild type mc2155 strain to various antibiotics were also determined as described.
Results
Growth of M. smegmatis AS strain regulated by tetracycline was dose-dependent
A dose response curve was established by inducing expression of glmM antisense RNA in M. smegmatis AS strain with different concentrations of tetracycline (Fig. 1B). The growth rates of the tetracycline-induced AS strain were reduced compared to those of the uninduced AS strain. With the increase of tetracycline concentration, the growth rates of M. smegmatis AS strain slowed down. The growth curve of the wild type mc2155 strain showed that induction by 20 ng/ml tetracycline would not affect normal growth of bacteria. When induced with 30 ng/ml tetracycline, the growth rate of wild type strain would decrease slightly (Fig. 1A). CFU determinations were taken at the same time points, and the results showed the same tendency as the OD600 value (Fig. 1C, 1D). Considering the induction efficiency of tetracycline and the influence of tetracycline to bacterial normal growth, 20 ng/ml tetracycline was used as inducer for the further experiments.
In addition, the OD600 value and CFU of M. smegmatis mc2155 carrying pMind were detected, and the result was consistent to the growth curve of wild type mc2155 strain (data not shown). The comparison of two growth curves of uninduced M. smegmatis AS strain and uninduced wild type mc2155 strain was also performed, and no significant difference was found (data not shown).
Interestingly, the growth of M. smegmatis AS strain presented the maximal inhibitory effect at 36 h. For this reason, the cultures induced for 36 h were collected for detecting GlmM protein expression and observing morphological changes.
Expression of GlmM protein was dramatically decreased in M. smegmatis AS strain
The productions of GlmM protein in wild type mc2155 strain and M. smegmatis AS strain induced with or without 20 ng/ml tetracycline were detected by using Western blot. The results showed that the expression of GlmM protein was 70% decreased in M. smegmatis AS strain induced with 20 ng/ml tetracycline, compared to GlmM protein in uninduced M. smegmatis AS strain (Fig. 2B). However, no obvious differences of GlmM protein expression in wild type mc2155 strain with or without 20 ng/ml tetracycline were observed (Fig. 2A), and the expressions of GlmM protein in wild type mc2155 strain were similar to M. smegmatis AS uninduced strain. The results of Western blot demonstrated that the biosynthesis of GlmM protein could be inhibited effectively under the control of 20 ng/ml tetracycline in M. smegmatis AS strain.
M. smegmatis AS strain induced by tetracycline had morphological changes
To identify if a decrease in GlmM protein would affect the morphology of M. smegmatis AS strain, SEM and TEM were performed. As the images shown, both wild type mc2155 strain with 20 ng/ml tetracycline (Fig. 3A) and M. smegmatis AS strain without tetracycline (Fig. 3B, 3C) had a rod-like shape and a smooth cell surface similar to wild type mc2155 strain [18]. However, there were obvious morphological changes in induced M. smegmatis AS strain (Fig. 3D, 3E) compared to wild type mc2155 strain. The morphology of M. smegmatis AS strain with 20 ng/ml tetracycline exhibited an irregular appearance with a wrinkled cellular surface and an enlarged shape. TEM observation showed that M. smegmatis AS strain induced with 20 ng/ml tetracycline appeared to a bigger size and a lower density of cell contents compared to uninduced AS strain (Fig. 4 and Fig. 5). These results indicated that insufficient of GlmM protein lead a morphological changes in mycobacteria.
GlmM protein affects the biofilm formation in M. smegmatis
To further investigate the roles of GlmM protein, the formation of biofilm in M. smegmatis AS strain induced by 20 ng/ml tetracycline was carried out. As shown in Fig 6, the biofilm formation of wild type mc2155 strain induced with 20 ng/ml tetracycline was similar as the uninduced strain, however, the M. smegmatis AS strain induced with 20 ng/ml tetracycline formed less biofilms compared with the uninduced AS strain (Fig. 6B). This was also confirmed by quantitation of crystal violet staining (Fig. 6A). The result indicated that GlmM had effect on biofilm formation in M. smegmatis.
Insufficient GlmM protein increased the sensitivity to anti-tuberculosis drugs in M. smegmatis
To investigate if GlmM protein could affect the sensitivity to anti-tuberculosis drugs in M. smegmatis, the MICs of five first-line anti-tuberculosis drugs in wild type mc2155 strain and M. smegmatis AS strain were determined. As shown in Table 2, the M. smegmatis AS strain induced with 20 ng/ml tetracycline was more sensitive to INH and EMB than uninduced AS strain. However, there was no significant difference of antimicrobial susceptibility to STR, PZA and RMF between induced and uninduced AS strains. In addition, all the MICs of anti-tuberculosis drugs to wild type mc2155 strain with or without tetracycline were similar to uninduced M. smegmatis AS strain.
Table 2. MICs of anti-tuberculosis drugs in wild type mc2155 strainand M. smegmatis AS strain.
MICs (µg/ml) | |||||
Strains | INH | EMB | RMF | STR | PZA |
WT (−) | 3.33±1.44 | 0.26±0.09 | 0.03±0.00 | 0.27±0.12 | 20.80±9.01 |
WT (+) | 2.50±0.00 | 0.26±0.09 | 0.03±0.01 | 0.20±0.00 | 20.80±9.01 |
AS (−) | 2.08±0.72 | 0.26±0.09 | 0.04±0.02 | 0.20±0.00 | 20.80±9.01 |
AS (+) | 0.26±0.09 | 0.02±0.02 | 0.03±0.01 | 0.20±0.00 | 20.80±9.01 |
WT (−). Wild type mc2155 strain without tetracycline; WT (+). Wild type mc2155 strain induced with 20 ng/ml tetracycline; AS (−). M. smegmatis AS strain without tetracycline; AS (+). M. smegmatis AS strain induced with 20 ng/ml tetracycline. The experiment was carried out in triplicate, the mean value and standard deviation were indicated.
Discussion
The M. tuberculosis has a unique cell wall structure, which is essential for bacterial viability. The enzymes involved in different biosynthetic pathways of cell wall are considerable attractive for the development of anti-tuberculosis drugs. In our previous study, GlmM had been identified as phosphoglucosamine mutase to catalyze epimerization between glucosamine-6-phosphate and glucosamine-1-phosphate during the biosynthesis of UDP-GlcNAc, which is a crucial material for cell wall. GlmM is essential for mycobacteria growth, which means it is a potential target for anti-tuberculosis drugs [12]. Here, the biological functions of GlmM protein were investigated.
M. smegmatis is commonly used in work on the mycobacterium species due to its fast growing and non-pathogenic. Furthermore, its proteins have high homology with M. tuberculosis and it also shares the same cell wall structure of M. tuberculosis. These properties make M. smegmatis a good model organism for pathogenic M. tuberculosis. In addition, the bioinformatics analysis data showed that M. smegmatis GlmM protein was high homology with M. tuberculosis GlmM protein, which shares 79% identities to each other. Furthermore, it had proved that glmM gene was essential for the growth of both M. tuberculosis [19] and M. smegmatis [12]. For these reasons, M. smegmatis was used as a surrogate host for M. tuberculosis.
To facilitate the analysis of glmM gene functions in mycobacteria, a tetracycline-inducible vector pMind was used to construct an expression strain of glmM antisense RNA expression. Different lengths of antisense RNAs were tested in our lab. There was little impact on GlmM protein expression by using full length of glmM antisense RNA, however, glmM antisense mRNAs with 200, 300 and 420 bases bind with the 5′ end of glmM mRNA gave a good and similar effect on inhibition of GlmM protein (data not shown). In this study, glmM antisense RNA with 420 bases was chosen for all the experiments. In addition, a blast of the glmM antisense RNA fragment (420 bases) against the M. smegmatis genome was performed to check its specificity to the glmM gene. The results showed that this glmM antisense RNA fragment was specifically matched with the glmM gene in M. smegmatis, which indicated that the glmM mRNA was blocked by this antisense RNA fragment for the biosynthesis of GlmM protein.
We had recently constructed a conditional M. smegmatis glmM gene knockout strain and confirmed that glmM gene was essential for the growth of M. smegmatis [12]. However, the further studies of glmM gene functions would be hampered by the lethal phenotype of M. smegmatis glmM gene knockout strain. In order to get more information of glmM gene functions in mycobacteria, a gene knockdown strain (M. smegmatis AS strain) was constructed here. The M. smegmatis AS strain was induced by tetracycline and the induction was “dose dependent”. The growth of M. smegmatis AS strain was almost suppressed with 50 ng/ml tetracycline. However, to ensure that we could get a sufficient amount of living cells for further analysis, only tetracycline at low concentration could be chosen as the inducer for M. smegmatis AS strain. In our study, the M. smegmatis AS strain was induced with 20 ng/ml tetracycline for 36 h. Under this condition, the GlmM protein expression in AS strain was fallen by about 70%, which was sufficient to cause the decreased rate of cell growth and the visible morphology changes. Furthermore, a certain amount of living cells could be collected. More importantly, there was no effect on normal growth when wild type M. smegmatis induced with 20 ng/ml tetracycline. All of these demonstrated that the M. smegmatis AS strain could be used for studying the roles of glmM gene.
In the study we found that the inductive effect became weaker after induction by tetracycline for 36 h, there were two possible reasons to explain this phenomenon. One was the stability of tetracycline, which was an important factor for sustained induction of glmM antisense mRNA expression. Tetracycline is unstable and easily degraded by both acidic and alkaline environments. We found the pH value of culture was slightly raised due to metabolic products of bacteria, which might cause a degradation of tetracycline. Another possible explanation is that at the initial of cell growth, the GlmM protein expressed in tetracycline-induced M. smegmatis AS strain was staying in a lower level, which could not maintain a normal growth. However, with the extended culture time, the GlmM protein would gradually accumulate to a certain level due to degradation of tetracycline, therefore, the cell growth would be restored.
The morphology of M. smegmatis glmM gene knockdown strain was compared with that of glmM gene knockout strain, M. smegmatis LS2 [12]. After induced with 20 ng/ml tetracycline for 36 h, the morphology of M. smegmatis AS strain showed a wrinkled cellular surface and an enlargement shape, but no obvious cell lysis was observed as M. smegmatis LS2. This indicated that the expression of GlmM protein in M. smegmatis glmM gene knockdown strain reduced significantly, but not at lethal level. We noticed that cell debris were observed in M. smegmatis AS strain which were induced with 20 ng/ml tetracycline by SEM, but no similar phenomenon was observed in uninduced AS strain. Another notable phenomenon was that we could not obtain a compact pellet when the cells of induced M. smegmatis AS strain were centrifuged. These details gave us a hint that the cell of induced M. smegmatis AS strain was abnormal. Considering the irregular cellular surface and the reduced cell contents of induced M. smegmatis AS strain, we speculated that insufficient GlmM activity destroyed the integrity of cell wall, increased the permeability and made the cell contents spilling.
Biofilm in bacteria can significantly enhance their resistance to antibiotics. Previous studies had proved that glmM mutation would reduce biofilm formation in Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus gordonii [20], [21]. Here, the biofilm formation in M. smegmatis AS strain was investigated. We found that the biofilm formation was reduced when M. smegmatis AS strain was induced with 20 ng/ml tetracycline, indicated that glmM gene had effect on the biofilm formation of M. smegmatis. For the development of biofilm formation in M. smegmatis, Recht et al. had showed that the glycopeptidolipids, which was known to be present in the outermost layer of the envelope, was important for initial surface attachment during biofilm formation [22]. Ojha et al. found that a short chain mycolic acid (C56–C68) played an important role in the development of biofilm architecture in M. smegmatis [23]. Although GlmM enzyme was not involved in the biosynthesis process of mycolic acid and glycopeptidolipids directly, the reduced GlmM expression might impair the cell wall integrity which influenced covalent attachment of mycolic acid to arabinogalactan and anchoring of glycopeptidolipids and subsequently reduced the biofilm formation.
Shimazu et al. and Jolly et al. had reported that glmM mutations in Streptococcus gordonii and Streptococcus aureus result in reduced methicillin resistance [20], [24]. The susceptibility test for antimicrobials was also carried out in this study. The results showed that M. smegmatis AS strain induced with 20 ng/ml tetracycline was more sensitive to INH and EMB than uninduced AS strain. Interestingly, all of these drugs including INH, EMB and methicillin target the bacterial cell wall, which indicated that inhibition of GlmM protein could facilitate the efficacy of anti-tuberculosis drugs which target on cell wall synthesis. In addition, we should note that the MIC to PZA was determined at a neutral pH, which was not the optimum pH (pH 5.5) for PZA activity [25]. Generally, M. smegmatis grow in the neutral pH. Furthermore, the tetracycline is easily degraded in the acid condition. To test the impact of pH on M. smegmatis growth and tetracycline stability, additional experiment was performed as follow: M. smegmatis AS strain was inoculated in LB broth containing 0.05% Tween 80 at pH 5.5, and tetracycline at 0 ng/ml and 20 ng/ml was added respectively. We found that the growth of M. smegmatis AS strain was slowly in the acid medium, and no difference of the growth rate was detected between two groups (data not shown). The results demonstrated that the acidic pH would slow down the growth of M. smegmatis and decrease the stability of tetracycline. Considering the above factors, the MIC experiment was performed at a neutral pH.
These results provide a new insight on GlmM functions in mycobacteria. Due to the significant role in biofilm formation and sensitivity to antibiotics, GlmM is expected to be a potential target for development of new anti-tuberculosis drug.
Acknowledgments
We thank Professor Michael R McNeil, Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, Colorado State University, for providing us with pMind vector.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2012CB518803; http://www.973.gov.cn/English/Index.aspx), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30970067; http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/Portal0/default166.htm). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Dye C, Espinal MA, Watt CJ, Mbiaga C, Williams BG (2002) Worldwide incidence of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. J Infect Dis 185: 1197–1202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Gandhi NR, Moll A, Sturm AW, Pawinski R, Govender T, et al. (2006) Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis as a cause of death in patients co-infected with tuberculosis and HIV in a rural area of South Africa. Lancet 368: 1575–1580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Daffe M, Draper P (1998) The envelope layers of mycobacteria with reference to their pathogenicity. Adv Microb Physiol 39: 131–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Brennan PJ (2003) Structure, function, and biogenesis of the cell wall of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. . Tuberculosis (Edinb) 83: 91–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Dinadayala P, Kaur D, Berg S, Amin AG, Vissa VD, et al. (2006) Genetic basis for the synthesis of the immunomodulatory mannose caps of lipoarabinomannan in Mycobacterium tuberculosis . J Biol Chem 281: 20027–20035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Mengin-Lecreulx D, van Heijenoort J (1996) Characterization of the essential gene glmM encoding phosphoglucosamine mutase in Escherichia coli . J Biol Chem 271: 32–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Raetz CR (1986) Molecular genetics of membrane phospholipid synthesis. Annu Rev Genet 20: 253–295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Mengin-Lecreulx D, van Heijenoort J (1994) Copurification of glucosamine-1-phosphate acetyltransferase and N-acetylglucosamine-1-phosphate uridyltransferase activities of Escherichia coli: characterization of the glmU gene product as a bifunctional enzyme catalyzing two subsequent steps in the pathway for UDP-N-acetylglucosamine synthesis. J Bacteriol 176: 5788–5795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Mengin-Lecreulx D, van Heijenoort J (1993) Identification of the glmU gene encoding N-acetylglucosamine-1-phosphate uridyltransferase in Escherichia coli . J Bacteriol 175: 6150–6157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Klein DJ, Ferre-D'Amare AR (2006) Structural basis of glmS ribozyme activation by glucosamine-6-phosphate. Science 313: 1752–1756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Jolly L, Ferrari P, Blanot D, Van Heijenoort J, Fassy F, et al. (1999) Reaction mechanism of phosphoglucosamine mutase from Escherichia coli . Eur J Biochem 262: 202–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Li S, Kang J, Yu W, Zhou Y, Zhang W, et al. (2012) Identification of M. tuberculosis Rv3441c and M. smegmatis MSMEG_1556 and Essentiality of M. smegmatis MSMEG_1556. PLoS One 7: e42769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Blokpoel MC, Murphy HN, O'Toole R, Wiles S, Runn ES, et al. (2005) Tetracycline-inducible gene regulation in mycobacteria. Nucleic Acids Res 33: e22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Thomason MK, Storz G (2010) Bacterial antisense RNAs: how many are there, and what are they doing? Annu Rev Genet 44: 167–188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Chen WP, Kuo TT (1993) A simple and rapid method for the preparation of gram-negative bacterial genomic DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 21: 2260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Qu H, Xin Y, Dong X, Ma Y (2007) An rmlA gene encoding d-glucose-1-phosphate thymidylyltransferase is essential for mycobacterial growth. FEMS Microbiol Lett 275: 237–243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Palomino JC, Martin A, Camacho M, Guerra H, Swings J, et al. (2002) Resazurin microtiter assay plate: simple and inexpensive method for detection of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis . Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46: 2720–2722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Zhang W, Jones VC, Scherman MS, Mahapatra S, Crick D, et al. (2008) Expression, essentiality, and a microtiter plate assay for mycobacterial GlmU, the bifunctional glucosamine-1-phosphate acetyltransferase and N-acetylglucosamine-1-phosphate uridyltransferase. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 40: 2560–2571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Sassetti CM, Boyd DH, Rubin EJ (2003) Genes required for mycobacterial growth defined by high density mutagenesis. Mol Microbiol 48: 77–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Shimazu K, Takahashi Y, Uchikawa Y, Shimazu Y, Yajima A, et al. (2008) Identification of the Streptococcus gordonii glmM gene encoding phosphoglucosamine mutase and its role in bacterial cell morphology, biofilm formation, and sensitivity to antibiotics. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 53: 166–177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Liu XD, Duan J, Guo LH (2009) Role of phosphoglucosamine mutase on virulence properties of Streptococcus mutans . Oral Microbiol Immunol 24: 272–277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Recht J, Martinez A, Torello S, Kolter R (2000) Genetic analysis of sliding motility in Mycobacterium smegmatis . J Bacteriol 182: 4348–4351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Ojha A, Anand M, Bhatt A, Kremer L, Jacobs WR Jr, et al. (2005) GroEL1: a dedicated chaperone involved in mycolic acid biosynthesis during biofilm formation in mycobacteria. Cell 123: 861–873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Jolly L, Wu S, van Heijenoort J, de Lencastre H, Mengin-Lecreulx D, et al. (1997) The femR315 gene from Staphylococcus aureus, the interruption of which results in reduced methicillin resistance, encodes a phosphoglucosamine mutase. J Bacteriol 179: 5321–5325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Zhang Y, Mitchison D (2003) The curious characteristics of pyrazinamide: a review. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 7: 6–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]