Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2013 Apr;57(4):1938–1940. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01461-12

Combined Intravenous and Intraventricular Administration of Colistin Methanesulfonate in Critically Ill Patients with Central Nervous System Infection

Mairi Ziaka a, Sophia L Markantonis b, Marizoza Fousteri b, Paris Zygoulis a, Dimitris Panidis b, Marios Karvouniaris a, Demosthenes Makris a,, Epaminondas Zakynthinos a
PMCID: PMC3623300  PMID: 23335739

Abstract

Colistin pharmacokinetics were prospectively studied after intravenous administration of colistin methanesulphonate in critically ill patients without central nervous system infection (controls, n = 5) and in patients with external ventricular drain-associated ventriculitis after intravenous administration (EVDViv, n = 3) or combined intravenous/intraventricular administration (EVDVcomb, n = 4). Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)/serum colistin concentration ratios were higher in EVDViv than in control patients (11% versus 7%, P ≤ 0.05) and in EVDVcomb compared to all other patients (P < 0.0001). CSF colistin concentrations above the MIC of 0.5 μg/ml were achieved only in EVDVcomb patients.

TEXT

Previous studies have suggested that the level of antibiotics in the ventricular cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is important for the outcome of external ventricular drainage (EVD)-related ventriculitis (13). The presence of multiresistant bacteria and the poor penetration of many drugs through the blood-brain barrier have imposed the use of intrathecal therapies (4).

Today, colistin, administered as its prodrug colistin methanesulphonate (CMS), is one of the few antibiotics available for treatment of infections by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative organisms. However, intravenous (i.v.) administration is reported to have a relatively poor CSF distribution and clinical outcomes vary (57). Data with respect to the efficacy of intraventricular polymyxins, as an add-on therapy, combined with systemic antibiotics are sparse and mainly observational (5, 8).

We aimed to determine the effect of intravenous and combined intravenous/intraventricular CMS administration on colistin concentrations in the CSF and serum in critically ill patients with or without central nervous system (CNS) infection.

This prospective case-controlled randomized study was conducted in a tertiary hospital, during a 12-month period between 2011 and 2012. Inclusion criteria were as follows: age > 18 years, diagnosis of EVD-related ventriculitis caused by Gram-negative bacteria, controlled intracranial pressure (<20 mm Hg) for 24 h prior to the study, no renal failure, and no allergy to colistin. Patients with EVD on i.v. CMS treatment for infections by Gram-negative bacteria other than CNS infections were included in the study as controls. The study was approved by the Hospital Ethics and Research Committee and performed in accordance with good clinical practice guidelines.

Control patients received 3,000,000 IU (240 mg) CMS (approximately 90 mg colistin base activity [CBA]) i.v. every 8 h. Patients with EVD-associated ventriculitis caused by Gram-negative bacteria (diagnosed on the basis of clinical grounds plus positive CSF cultures or CSF inflammation, including pleocytosis and a reduced CSF/serum glucose ratio) were randomized to receive the same i.v. dose (EVDViv group), or the i.v. dose combined with 125,000 IU (10 mg) CMS (∼3.75 CBA) administered intraventricularly, once daily (EVDVcomb). A 2-ml volume of 0.9% NaCl (volume of catheter lumen) was instilled via the catheter following intraventricular administration, and, at each sample time, 2 ml of CSF was discarded prior to collection of a CSF sample to avoid CMS carryover. Serum and CSF samples were collected at h 1, 4, and 8 on the first day and at h 1 and 8 on days 3 and 5 after CMS administration. Colistin concentrations were determined using isocratic high-performance liquid chromatography as previously reported (9).

AUC serum and AUC CSF (the area under the concentration-time curve from the time of dosing to the time of the last observation for serum and CSF, respectively) for colistin were estimated from concentration-time data by the linear trapezoidal rule. Data sets were tested for normality (Shapiro-Wilk test), and quantitative variables were compared by using the Mann-Whitney test or t test as appropriate.

Seven patients with ventriculitis and five controls were included; controls received CMS i.v. as part of therapy for pneumonia (n = 4) or bacteremia (n = 1). Table 1 shows¢ participants' characteristics. CSF white blood cell counts were elevated in the EVDVcomb group; this might indicate severe infection, but no statistically significant difference was found between groups.

Table 1.

Clinical data and CSF characteristics of patients in the three study groups at baselinea

Parameter Value
Controls (n = 5) EVDViv group (n = 3) EVDVcomb group (n = 4)
Age (yr) 46 ± 17 48 ± 14 48 ± 12
Sex (no. of males/no. of females) 4/1 1/2 3/1
Weight (kg) 82 ± 10 84 ± 16 86 ± 11
Creatinine (mg/dl) 1.2 ± 0,5 1.2 ± 0.4 1.3 ± 0.8
SOFA score 8 ± 4 7 ± 2 7 ± 1
APACHE II score 22 ± 6 22 ± 6 20 ± 4
GCS 8 ± 4 7 ± 1 9 ± 4
CSF characteristics
    WBC (cells/μl) 3 ± 2 344 ± 395 13,650 ± 15,415
    Glu (mg/dl) 79 ± 25 22 ± 19 17 ± 16
    Pr (mg/dl) 64 ± 60 228 ± 123 305 ± 145
a

Data are presented as means ± SD or as otherwise indicated. EVDViv, external ventricular drainage-associated ventriculitis patients treated with i.v. colistin; EVDVcomb, external ventricular drainage-associated ventriculitis patients treated with combined i.v. and intraventricular colistin; SOFA, sequential organ failure assessment; APACHE, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation; GCS, Glasgow coma scale; WBC, white blood cell; Glu, glucose; Pr, protein.

CMS administration and CSF collection procedures were well tolerated. No adverse events related to procedures were observed. Isolated pathogens were found to be susceptible to colistin as follows: in members of the control group with pneumonia, Klebsiella pneumoniae (colistin MIC of 2.0) (n = 1) and Acinetobacter baumannii (MIC of 2.0, 2.0, and 0.5) (n = 3), and in those with bacteremia, Acinetobacter baumannii (MIC 0.5) (n = 1); in members of the EVDViv group, Acinetobacter baumannii (MIC 0.5) (n = 1) (two members of the group showed no bacterial growth in culture); and in members of the EVDVcomb group, Acinetobacter baumannii (MIC 0.5) (n = 2) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (MIC 2.0) (n = 2).

Complete clinical-microbiological resolution of EVD-related ventriculitis was obtained in one patient in the EVDViv group (and in the other two only after a change of the initial treatment regimen to intraventricular plus i.v. CMS or aminoglycosides) and in three patients in the EVDVcomb group (one patient presented with refractory EVD-related ventriculitis and died).

On day 1, the means ± standard deviations (SD) of the measured colistin serum concentrations in controls did not differ significantly from those measured in EVDViv patients (P > 0.05); mean CSF concentrations were higher in EVDViv patients at all time points, but to a significant (P = 0.009) extent only at h 4 (Table 2).

Table 2.

Colistin concentration-time data for the different study groupsa

Study group Day Time (h) No. of samples Mean ± SD (ng/ml) (range)
CSF/serum ratio
Serum CSF
Control 1 1 5 2,308 ± 348 152 ± 18 0.066 ± 0.002
4 5 1,491 ± 74 105 ± 11 0.070 ± 0.006
8 5 1,041 ± 135 76 ± 11 0.074 ± 0.002
3 1 3 2,039 ± 4 141 ± 17 0.069 ± 0.001
8 1 1,033 72 0.070
5 1 1 2,013 137 0.068
EVDViv 1 1 2 2,189 (1,922–2,455) 237 (198–275) 0.108
4 2 1,451 (1,405–1,498) 156 (152–159) 0.107
8 2 1,089 (930–1,248) 120 (103–137) 0.110
3 1 2 2,205 (2,097–2,313) 254 (213–295) 0.114
8 2 1,001 (970–1,032) 119 (117–120) 0.118
5 1 1 2,449 259 0.106
8 1 1,258 140 0.111
EVDVcomb 1 1 3 3,451 ± 221 1,449 ± 124 0.420 ± 0.012
4 1 1,838 838 0.456
8 1 1,523 621 0.408
3 1 1 3,144 1,357 0.432
5 1 3 3,531 ± 202 1,430 ± 40 0.406 ± 0.012
8 2 1,514 (1,415–1,612) 611 (548–675) 0.403
a

Data are presented as means ± SD or as otherwise indicated. EVDViv, external ventricular drainage-associated ventriculitis patients treated with i.v. colistin; EVDVcomb, external ventricular drainage-associated ventriculitis patients treated with combined i.v. and intraventricular colistin.

On day 3, at h 1, mean maximum steady-state colistin concentrations (Cmax CSF) were similar to those achieved on day 1 in all patients regardless of ventriculitis status (P > 0.05), suggesting a lack of accumulation over time.

On day 1, mean ± SD CSF/serum concentration ratios were higher in the EVDViv group (h 1, P = 0.05; h 4, P < 0.005; h 8, P < 0.001) than in the control group (Table 2). Similar results were observed on days 3 and 5. Mean AUC CSF/AUC serum ratios were found to be about 60% higher in patients with ventriculitis than in control patients (0.110 versus 0.070). These findings might be indicative of greater colistin penetration in the presence of meningeal inflammation.

Colistin Cmax serum and Cmax CSF levels in the EVDVcomb group were significantly higher than those achieved in the EVDViv and control groups (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Similarly, median CSF/serum concentration ratios were significantly higher in the EVDVcomb group (≥0.40) than in the EVDViv group (0.11) and control group (0.07) (P < 0.0001). Notably, median colistin CSF concentrations were above the MIC of 0.5 μg/ml in the EVDVcomb patient group (1.4 μg/ml [range, 0.6 to 1.6 μg/ml), but not the EVDViv patient group (0.14 μg/ml [range, 0.07 to 0.3 μg/ml]), at all time points. Therefore, combined i.v.-intrathecal treatment can augment colistin levels in CSF, which is in agreement with recent data reported by Imberti et al. (10).

These data suggest the superiority of combined i.v.-intraventricular treatment to i.v. treatment alone and that combined treatment is more likely to effectively eradicate Gram-negative bacilli from the CNS. Notably, the clinical response rate with combined treatment was 75% in this study; we acknowledge that our study was not sufficiently powered and, thus, that definitive conclusions at the clinical level could be drawn from adequately powered studies in the future. Furthermore, the optimal dose and duration of intraventricular CMS therapy (commonly 40,000 to 500,000 IU/day [approximately 1.2 to 15.0 CBA]) remain undetermined (11). Nevertheless, our data suggest that combined intravenous-intrathecal treatment may achieve higher levels in CSF, which may be crucial in controlling multidrug-resistant infections.

A plausible explanation(s) for the higher colistin CSF concentrations in the EVDVcomb group—apart from the administration of the intraventricular CMS dose—could be higher protein binding (given increased protein concentrations) or increased membrane permeability. We hypothesize that the higher plasma colistin concentrations in this group are due to almost the whole intraventricular CMS dose being transformed to colistin in the CSF (creating a CSF-to-plasma concentration gradient) and then passing through the blood-brain barrier, in contrast to the intravenous dose, where a large amount (70% to 93%) of the CMS dose is renally or otherwise eliminated prior to its conversion to colistin. Therefore, the amount of colistin remaining in the body is the sum of almost the whole dose administered intraventricularly and the proportion (7% to 30% converted) (1214) of the dose administered intravenously.

Another point that should be underlined is that CMS penetration in the meninges in the absence of inflammation might be poor. The median colistin CSF/serum concentration ratio in our control patients was 0.07. This is comparable to that reported previously in critically ill patients with minimal CSF inflammation at the time of sampling (0.05 to 0.057) (4).

On the other hand, we found no evidence of drug accumulation over time such as one might have expected, and the decline in concentrations between h 4 and 8 suggests a smaller half-life (t1/2) of elimination than in previous pharmacokinetic studies in serum (15). The small population size in our study or the considerable fluctuations of steady-state concentrations of colistin throughout the dosage interval might explain these differences.

In conclusion, our findings suggest that the intravenous administration of CMS in critically ill patients with EVD-associated ventriculitis caused by Gram-negative bacteria provided a maximum concentration of colistin in CSF of 11% of that present in serum. In contrast, combined intraventricular-i.v. administration of CMS resulted in higher CSF levels of the drug which were above the MIC of one of the targeted pathogens, Acinetobacter baumannii, throughout the dosing interval, suggesting that this treatment modality may be considered in cases of EVD-related ventriculitis caused by Gram-negative bacteria, where high drug levels in the ventricles are important.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The study was performed at the University Hospital of Larissa, Greece, and at the Laboratory of Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Athens.

We declare that we have no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 18 January 2013

REFERENCES

  • 1. Lorber J, Kalhan SC, Mahgrefte B. 1970. Treatment of ventriculitis with gentamicin and cloxacillin in infants born with spina bifida. Arch. Dis. Child 45:178–185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Salmon JH. 1972. H. influenzae meningitis: associated ventriculitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 287:1203–1204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Stark G. 1968. Treatment of ventriculitis in hydrocephalic infants: intrathecal and intraventricular use of the new penicillins. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 10:36–445643344 [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Rodríguez Guardado A, Blanco A, Asensi V, Pérez F, Rial JC, Pintado V, Bustillo E, Lantero M, Tenza E, Alvarez M, Maradona JA, Cartón JA. 2008. Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter meningitis in neurosurgical patients with intraventricular catheters: assessment of different treatments. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 61:908–913 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Kim BN, Peleg AY, Lodise TP, Lipman J, Li J, Nation R, Paterson DL. 2009. Management of meningitis due to antibiotic-resistant Acinetobacter species. Lancet Infect. Dis. 9:245–255 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Maragakis LL, Perl TM. 2008. Acinetobacter baumannii: epidemiology. Antimicrobial resistance. and treatment options. Clin. Infect. Dis. 46:1254–1263 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Markantonis SL, Markou N, Fousteri M, Sakellaridis N, Karatzas S, Alamanos I, Dimopoulou E, Baltopoulos G. 2009. Penetration of colistin into cerebrospinal fluid. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:4907–4910 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Falagas ME, Bliziotis IA, Tam VH. 2007. Intraventricular or intrathecal use of polymyxins in patients with Gram-negative meningitis: a systematic review of the available evidence. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 29:9–25 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Markou N, Markantonis SL, Dimitrakis E, Panidis D, Boutzouka E, Karatzas S, Rafailidis P, Apostolakos H, Baltopoulos G. 2008. Colistin serum concentrations after intravenous administration in critically ill patients with serious multi-drug resistant, Gram-negative bacilli infections: a prospective, open label, uncontrolled study. Clin. Ther. 30:143–151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Imberti R, Cusato M, Accetta G, Marinò V, Procaccio F, Del Gaudio A, Iotti GA, Regazzi M. 2012. Cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics of colistin after intraventricular administration of colistin methanesulfonate. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56:4416–4421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Khawcharoenporn T, Apisarnthanarak A, Mundy LM. 2010. Intrathecal colistin for drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii central nervous system infection: a case series and systematic review. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 16:888–894 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Couet W, Grégoire N, Gobin P, Saulnier PJ, Frasca D, Marchand S, Mimoz O. 2011. Pharmacokinetics of colistin and colistimethate sodium after a single 80-mg intravenous dose of CMS in young healthy volunteers. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 89:875–879 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Li J, Milne RW, Nation RL, Turnidge JD, Smeaton TC, Coulthard K. 2004. Pharmacokinetics of colistin methanesulphonate and colistin in rats following an intravenous dose of colistin methanesulphonate. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 53:837–840 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Marchand S, Lamarche I, Gobin P, Couet W. 2010. Dose-ranging pharmacokinetics of colistin methanesulphonate (CMS) and colistin in rats following single intravenous CMS doses. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 65:1753–1758 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Plachouras D, Karvanen M, Friberg LE, Papadomichelakis E, Antoniadou A, Tsangaris I, Karaiskos I, Poulakou G, Kontopidou F, Armaganidis A, Cars O, Giamarellou H. 2009. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of colistin methanesulfonate and colistin after intravenous administration in critically ill patients with infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:3430–3436 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES