Abstract
Background
Although multipotential stromal cells/mesenchymal stem cell (MSCs) initially gained attention because of their ability to differentiate into multiple cell lineages, it is their capacity to produce and secrete growth factors and cytokines that makes them particularly valuable as potential cell therapeutics.
The Problem
Wound healing is an intricate process consisting of several integrated stages, including angiogenesis, collagen production, and cell migration and proliferation. Coordinating these processes to ensure rapid and thorough wound healing is necessary when developing therapeutics. This coordination, however, is disrupted in chronic nonhealing wounds, wherein the impaired blood supply and resulting ischemia compromise cellular functions and make it difficult to deliver the necessary signaling molecules.
Basic/Clinical Science Advances
MSCs secrete a combination of growth factors and cytokines, which have been shown to promote wound repair. This combination of growth factors and cytokines successfully induces angiogenesis, reduces inflammation, and promotes fibroblast migration and collagen production.
Clinical Care Relevance
The growth factors and cytokines secreted by MSCs can be administered to wounds by either transplanting cells or, as a safer alternative, using the conditioned medium of MSCs, which contains these secreted bioactive molecules. For their success in reducing wound closure time, MSCs offer a promising option for treating chronic wounds. Still, possible undesirable effects of MSC-based therapeutics, such as keloid formation, need to be carefully studied.
Conclusion
With its strong ability to secrete diverse growth factors and cytokines, MSC-based therapeutics, either with cell transplantation or the conditioned medium, offers a novel approach toward chronic nonhealing wounds.

Kenichi Tamama
Background
Multipotential stromal cells/mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are multipotent cells capable of differentiating into multiple cell lineages.1 MSCs are relatively easy to obtain and expand in vitro.2 In addition to autologous transplantation, allogenic MSC transplantation is also feasible, because these cells, like group O red blood cells, are immunologically silent.3 These characteristics make MSCs good candidates for cell therapeutics against various diseases including chronic nonhealing wounds, against which there are no effective therapies available.
Initially, MSC differentiation and direct incorporation into regenerating tissues were speculated to be a primary mechanism of MSC action; however, the contribution of transdifferentiation and direct incorporation are rather controversial.1 Rather, MSCs were shown to secrete various growth factors and cytokines such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which promote angiogenesis and wound healing in host tissues.4 Some of the MSC's wound healing and tissue regenerative effects could, in fact, be reproduced by the conditioned medium of MSCs (MSC-CM), which include all of the bioactive molecules secreted by MSCs in culture.4
In this review article, we will digest the latest research articles about the role of MSC-derived growth factors and cytokines in MSC-based therapeutics in nonhealing chronic wounds.
Target Articles.
1. Yew TL, Hung YT, Li HY, Chen HW, Chen LL, Tsai KS, Chiou SH, Chao KC, Huang TF, Chen HL, and Hung SC: Enhancement of wound healing by human multipotent stromal cell conditioned medium: the paracrine factors and p38MAPK activation. Cell Transplant 2011; 20: 693.
2. Lee EY, Xia Y, Kim WS, Kim MH, Kim TH, Kim KJ, Park BS, and Sung JH: Hypoxia-enhanced wound-healing function of adipose-derived stem cells: increase in stem cell proliferation and up-regulation of VEGF and bFGF. Wound Repair Regen 2009; 17: 540.
Clinical Problem Addressed
Chronic nonhealing wounds represent a major burden in healthcare. More than 6 million people are estimated to be afflicted with chronic wounds, with a total estimated cost of more than $25 billion annually in the United States.5 Chronic wounds cause serious consequences; for example, more than 70,000 lower limb amputations were performed on patients with diabetic foot problems in 2004 in the United States.5
Despite the recent advances in the medical science of wound healing, currently available therapeutics still attain only limited success against chronic wounds, and there is an urgent need for the development of novel effective therapeutics.6
Relevant Basic Science Context
Wound repair is an indispensible ability for humans to sustain life. It is also one of the most complex biological processes involving multiple types of cells and bioactive molecules acting in an orchestrated fashion. The normal wound healing process takes place in three distinct but overlapping stages—inflammation, new tissue formation, and remodeling7—and any arrests in these processes lead to the formation of nonhealing chronic wounds.
Vascular complications are often associated with chronic wounds. The resultant ischemia is one of the main contributing factors to the arrest of the wound healing process, as the limited supply of oxygen and other nutrients compromises cellular functions in injury sites and interferes with tissue repair processes.8 Therapeutic angiogenesis restores the blood supply to these ischemic wounds and promotes wound repair. Local administrations of angiogenic factors such as VEGF showed only limited success,9 suggesting that a combination of growth factors and cytokines rather than one specific growth factor is needed to attain neoangiogenesis with functional vasculatures. One possible solution is cytotherapy or cell transplantation with MSCs, as these cells are well known for secreting various growth factors and cytokines in response to environmental cues and can thus be expected to secrete these growth factors and cytokines in a coordinated manner.
Another common underlying condition causing nonhealing wounds is excessive inflammation. Although inflammation itself is essentially a body's protective response, persistent and excessive inflammation delays the wound repair process, especially in sterile or minimally contaminated wounds.10 Suppression of excessive inflammation should promote the repair process in chronic wounds. MSCs carry anti-inflammatory or immune-modulatory properties,3 and this might be one of the mechanisms through which MSCs promote wound healing.
In summary, MSC-based therapeutics is a promising approach to reverse the arrest of the wound repair process and promote the healing of chronic wounds.
Experimental Model or Material: Advantages and Limitations
To evaluate the roles of secreted growth factors and cytokines, MSCs were first cultured in the serum-free cell culture medium for 48–72 h and the “conditioned” medium was collected. The wound healing potency of these conditioned media was evaluated by an in vitro scratch assay as well as by a wound closure assay in mice models. The levels of growth factors and cytokines within the conditioned media were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Neutralizing antibodies, chemical inhibitors, and siRNA were utilized to identify the molecules (growth factors, cytokines, and intracellular signaling molecules) pivotal for the accelerated wound healing mediated by MSC-CM.
Cell migration is a key underlying process during wound healing.7 In vitro scratch assay is a simple assay measuring the closure speed of the scratch wound artificially created on the monolayer of cultured cells. This system mimics the cell migration process during wound healing in vivo and is a widely used method to analyze cell migration in vitro. The main advantage of this assay is that it is simple and easy to perform but still provides a strong evaluation of the roles of crucial molecular events in wound healing.11
On the other hand, the in vitro scratch assay is too simple to reproduce the entire in vivo wound healing process, as the wound healing process is an integration of several phases,7 and the in vitro scratch assay can only recapitulate a limited aspect of the wound healing process for a single cell type at a time.
Discussion of Findings and Relevant Literature
Wounded tissues are hypoxic because of disruption of local vasculatures. The core of the wound is most hypoxic (partial oxygen pressure or pO2 is 0–10 mmHg in dermal wound) with a progressive increase in the oxygen gradient toward the uninjured tissue at the periphery (pO2 is 60 mmHg in dermal wound). This limited oxygen supply compromises cellular functions at injury sites, interfering with tissue repair processes such as angiogenesis and collagen synthesis.8 Thus, the wound hypoxia is a key limiting factor in wound healing and it is imperative to study the behavior of MSCs in a hypoxic condition.
Previous studies suggested that the hypoxic condition promotes self-renewal of undifferentiated MSCs and enhances therapeutic potential.2,12 Lee et al. showed that the MSC-CM collected in the hypoxic culture condition (hypoxia MSC-CM) induced higher type I collagen formation by fibroblasts, stronger fibroblast migration in vitro, and dermal wound closure faster than MSC-CM collected in the normoxic culture condition.13 The hypoxia MSC-CM contained higher levels of growth factors including bFGF (basic fibroblast growth factor) and VEGF, and blocking antibodies against bFGF and VEGF reversed both fibroblast migration and wound closure induced by hypoxia MSC-CM, suggesting that these molecules play a crucial role in the MSC-CM–mediated wound healing process.
Take-Home Message.
Basic science advances
• MSCs secrete numerous growth factors and cytokines to accelerate wound healing and tissue regeneration.
• The hypoxic condition further increases the secretion of growth factors and cytokines from MSCs. These secreted molecules in turn stimulate fibroblasts in the wound areas to synthesize collagen and to migrate themselves, further accelerating wound repair process.
• Production of VEGF and bFGF by MSCs is upregulated in an HIF-dependent manner in the hypoxic condition.
• IL-6 also plays a pivotal role in MSC-mediated accelerated wound healing by promoting epithelial cell migration and angiogenesis. MSCs produce IL-6 in a p38MAPK pathway–dependent manner.
• Although IL-6 is one of the key mediators accelerating wound repair, excessive IL-6 secretion from MSCs might lead to keloid formation.
Clinical science advances
• MSCs are, like group O red blood cells, immunologically silent; thus, allogenic MSC transplantation is also feasible, in addition to autologous MSC transplantation.
• MSC's secretion of paracrine factors, more than engraftment and differentiation, promotes the angiogenesis, anti-inflammatory effects, and cell migration necessary for wound repair.
• The condition medium of MSCs contains a combination of growth factors and cytokines that significantly accelerates wound repair and reduces wound closure time.
• The wound repair property of MSC-based therapeutics is superior to single growth factor administration alone.
Relevance to clinical care
• Chronic nonhealing wounds, which suffer from insufficient blood supplies and excessive inflammation, can benefit from the proangiogenic and anti-inflammatory effects of MSCs.
• MSC-based therapeutics offers a novel approach toward chronic nonhealing wounds.
• MSC condition medium might provide a safer alternative to living cells for delivering necessary growth factors and cytokines that work in conjunction to accelerate wound healing.
• Possible untoward effects of MSC-based therapeutics, such as keloid formation, need to be carefully evaluated.
Hypoxic exposure activates several signal transduction pathways including hypoxia inducible factor (HIF), a master transcription factor that regulates the expression of hundreds of genes to promote cellular adaptation to the hypoxic condition.14 Our latest study revealed that HIF-1α is a pivotal signaling molecule for hypoxia-mediated upregulation of bFGF and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) secretion, whereas HIF-2α is a key signaling molecule for hypoxia-mediated upregulation of VEGF secretion from MSCs.2 HIF-1α is widely expressed in almost all tissues,14 whereas the expression of HIF-2α is restricted to certain cell types such as vascular endothelial cells.15 MSC's proangiogenic trait is the most important property promoting the wound repair process, and VEGF is the key proangiogenic growth factor. Thus, HIF-2α expression, in addition to ubiquitous HIF-1α expression, should be crucial for MSC's wound healing property.2
MSCs secrete numerous growth factors and cytokines, and all the aspects of MSC's wound healing properties cannot be explained by VEGF, HGF, and bFGF alone. Among the molecules secreted from MSCs, Yew et al. found that interleukin-6 (IL-6) plays a major role in the MSC-mediated accelerated wound healing process by enhancing epithelial cell migration and inducing angiogenesis.16 IL-6 is a pleiotropic cytokine carrying both pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory properties17; indeed, IL-6 has been reported as one of the key molecules promoting the wound healing process through multiple mechanisms including leukocyte recruitment, angiogenesis, and collagen production.18 IL-6 is one of the molecules most highly secreted from MSCs, and it was shown to be a pivotal molecule involved in the MSC stemness in vitro.19 Thus, it is reasonable to expect that IL-6 would be one of the key molecules mediating the MSC-mediated wound healing property. In addition to IL-6, chemotactic cytokines (chemokines) IL-8 (IL-8) and chemokine ligand 1 (CXCL1) in MSC-CM were also shown to enhance epithelial cell migration in this study. Their data showed that the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway is a key intracellular signaling pathway regulating the secretion of these molecules from MSCs.
The target articles have a significant impact, because they demonstrated that MSC-CM, in addition to MSC itself, promotes the wound repair process and that multiple growth factors and cytokines secreted from MSCs, including VEGF, bFGF, IL-6, IL-8, and CXCL1, are involved in the MSC-mediated wound healing. These articles clearly showed that MSC-CM can be regarded as a sort of pharmacological agent containing a mixture of various growth factors and cytokines promoting wound repair and tissue regeneration.
Innovation
The treatment of chronic nonhealing wounds is challenging, but accumulating evidence has suggested that MSC-based therapeutics is a promising option for this debilitating condition. As discussed earlier, MSC-based therapeutics has enormous potential for wound healing therapies.
Cell-based therapeutics is already clinically used for chronic nonhealing wounds, as exemplified by Dermagraft (Smith and Nephew/Advanced Tissue Sciences, London, United Kingdom), which includes living fibroblasts derived from neonatal foreskin, extracellular matrix, and a biodegradable scaffold.20 MSCs carry even stronger paracrine activity,4 and thus, stronger wound healing effects are also anticipated.
Another innovative aspect of MSC-based therapeutics is that not only MSCs themselves but also acellular components such as MSC-CM carry strong therapeutic potentials. Acellular components are much easier for clinicians to handle than living cells when applying wound therapies. Another potential advantage of acellular components is safety. Malignant transformation during in vitro expansion or after transplantation is a potential concern for MSC-based therapeutics.21 Using acellular components for wound healing treatment could avoid this possibility.
Summary Illustration
The summary figure illustrates that transplanted MSCs enhance the wound repair process by stimulating proliferation and migration of keratinocytes and fibroblasts and inducing angiogenesis via secretion of growth factors and cytokines such as VEGF, bFGF, HGF, and IL-6. MSC-CM containing these growth factors and cytokines carry similar wound healing properties as well.
Caution, Critical Remarks, and Recommendations
Are there any possible adverse events with MSC-based therapeutics? Negative aspects of MSC-based therapeutics for wound repair have not been yet well addressed, but still, we can speculate based on the accumulating evidence from wound repair and MSC biology. As we discussed earlier, sustained elevation of inflammatory cytokines leads to deficient healing.22 Although MSCs have also been shown to exert anti-immunologic and anti-inflammatory effects,3 it is still possible that these MSC-derived cytokines might cause excessive inflammation through recruitment of more inflammatory cells and delay the wound healing process in certain situations. In addition, IL-6 has been shown to be involved in keloid formation, making keloid or excessive scar formation another possible unwanted effect of MSC treatment.23 Further studies are needed to address the possible negative consequences of MSCs or MSC-CM.
Future Development of Interest
MSC-CM contains a combination of growth factors and cytokines promoting wound repair; thus, not only MSC itself but also MSC-CM could be used as a novel pharmacological agent for wound repair. However, MSC's paracrine activity declines during in vitro MSC expansion,24 and interdonor variability of paracrine profile was also noted.25 One possible solution is to choose the MSCs with the optimal paracrine profile and immortalize these cells in an early passage so that we could produce the ideal combination of growth factors and cytokines with minimum variability, possibly in a large scale in the GMP setting. It should also improve quality, because the levels of growth factors and cytokines could be easily monitored.
Abbreviations and Acronyms
- bFGF
basic fibroblast growth factor
- CXCL1
chemokine ligand 1
- HGF
hepatocyte growth factor
- HIF
hypoxia inducible factor
- IL-6/8
interleukin-6/8
- MAPK
mitogen-activated protein kinase
- MSC
multipotential stromal cell/mesenchymal stem cell
- MSC-CM
conditioned medium (media) of MSCs
- pO2
partial oxygen pressure
- VEGF
vascular endothelial growth factor
Acknowledgments and Funding Sources
This study was supported by AHA Beginner-Grant-in-aid (09BGIA2050227 to K.T.). The authors apologize to all researchers whose scientific works that have contributed to the understanding of the MSC-based therapeutics for wound healing were not directly cited in this review because of limitations in references.
Author Disclosure and Ghostwriting
The authors have no competing interests. This article was not written by any writer other than the authors.
References
- 1.Pittenger MF. Martin BJ. Mesenchymal stem cells and their potential as cardiac therapeutics. Circ Res. 2004;95:9. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000135902.99383.6f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tamama K. Kawasaki H. Kerpedjieva SS. Guan J. Ganju RK. Sen CK. Differential roles of hypoxia inducible factor subunits in multipotential stromal cells under hypoxic condition. J Cell Biochem. 2011;112:804. doi: 10.1002/jcb.22961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Uccelli A. Moretta L. Pistoia V. Mesenchymal stem cells in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8:726. doi: 10.1038/nri2395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Caplan AI. Why are MSCs therapeutic? New data: new insight. J Pathol. 2009;217:318. doi: 10.1002/path.2469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sen CK. Gordillo GM. Roy S. Kirsner R. Lambert L. Hunt TK, et al. Human skin wounds: a major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy. Wound Repair Regen. 2009;17:763. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00543.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Enoch S. Grey JE. Harding KG. Recent advances and emerging treatments. BMJ. 2006;332:962. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7547.962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gurtner GC. Werner S. Barrandon Y. Longaker MT. Wound repair and regeneration. Nature. 2008;453:314. doi: 10.1038/nature07039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sen CK. Wound healing essentials: let there be oxygen. Wound Repair Regen. 2009;17:1. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2008.00436.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dvorak HF. Angiogenesis: update 2005. J Thromb Haemost. 2005;3:1835. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2005.01361.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Szpaderska AM. DiPietro LA. Inflammation in surgical wound healing: friend or foe? Surgery. 2005;137:571. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Liang CC. Park AY. Guan JL. In vitro scratch assay: a convenient and inexpensive method for analysis of cell migration in vitro. Nat Protoc. 2007;2:329. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Grayson WL. Zhao F. Izadpanah R. Bunnell B. Ma T. Effects of hypoxia on human mesenchymal stem cell expansion and plasticity in 3D constructs. J Cell Physiol. 2006;207:331. doi: 10.1002/jcp.20571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lee EY. Xia Y. Kim WS. Kim MH. Kim TH. Kim KJ, et al. Hypoxia-enhanced wound-healing function of adipose-derived stem cells: increase in stem cell proliferation and up-regulation of VEGF and bFGF. Wound Repair Regen. 2009;17:540. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00499.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Semenza GL. Oxygen-dependent regulation of mitochondrial respiration by hypoxia-inducible factor 1. Biochem J. 2007;405:1. doi: 10.1042/BJ20070389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tian H. McKnight SL. Russell DW. Endothelial PAS domain protein 1 (EPAS1), a transcription factor selectively expressed in endothelial cells. Genes Dev. 1997;11:72. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.1.72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yew TL. Hung YT. Li HY. Chen HW. Chen LL. Tsai KS, et al. Enhancement of wound healing by human multipotent stromal cell conditioned medium: the paracrine factors and p38MAPK activation. Cell Transplant. 2011;20:693. doi: 10.3727/096368910X550198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jawa RS. Anillo S. Huntoon K. Baumann H. Kulaylat M. Analytic review: interleukin-6 in surgery, trauma, and critical care: part I: basic science. J Intensive Care Med. 2011;26:3. doi: 10.1177/0885066610395678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lin ZQ. Kondo T. Ishida Y. Takayasu T. Mukaida N. Essential involvement of IL-6 in the skin wound-healing process as evidenced by delayed wound healing in IL-6-deficient mice. J Leukoc Biol. 2003;73:713. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0802397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pricola KL. Kuhn NZ. Haleem-Smith H. Song Y. Tuan RS. Interleukin-6 maintains bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell stemness by an ERK1/2-dependent mechanism. J Cell Biochem. 2009;108:577. doi: 10.1002/jcb.22289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jimenez PA. Jimenez SE. Tissue and cellular approaches to wound repair. Am J Surg. 2004;187:56S. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(03)00305-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lepperdinger G. Brunauer R. Jamnig A. Laschober G. Kassem M. Controversial issue: is it safe to employ mesenchymal stem cells in cell-based therapies? Exp Gerontol. 2008;43:1018. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2008.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Henry G. Garner WL. Inflammatory mediators in wound healing. Surg Clin North Am. 2003;83:483. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6109(02)00200-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ghazizadeh M. Tosa M. Shimizu H. Hyakusoku H. Kawanami O. Functional implications of the IL-6 signaling pathway in keloid pathogenesis. J Invest Dermatol. 2007;127:98. doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5700564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Crisostomo PR. Wang M. Wairiuko GM. Morrell ED. Terrell AM. Seshadri P, et al. High passage number of stem cells adversely affects stem cell activation and myocardial protection. Shock. 2006;26:575. doi: 10.1097/01.shk.0000235087.45798.93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhukareva V. Obrocka M. Houle JD. Fischer I. Neuhuber B. Secretion profile of human bone marrow stromal cells: donor variability and response to inflammatory stimuli. Cytokine. 2010;50:317. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2010.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

