Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Immunol. 2013 Jan 23;190(4):1402–1406. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1203034

Antibody-dependent memory-like NK cells distinguished by FcRγ-deficiency1

Tianxiang Zhang 1, Jeannine M Scott 1, Ilwoong Hwang 1, Sungjin Kim 1
PMCID: PMC3623944  NIHMSID: NIHMS432551  PMID: 23345329

Abstract

Because NK cells lack gene recombination machinery and are thought to be relatively short-lived, whether NK cells can mount effective recall responses to re-infections by diverse pathogens for long-term is unclear. Here, we report that FcRγ-deficient NK cells, which we recently identified and termed gNK cells, possess distinct memory features directed by Fc receptor-mediated antibody-dependent target recognition. The presence of gNK cells was associated with prior cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection, yet gNK cell responses were not restricted to HCMV-infected target cells. In the presence of virus-specific antibodies, gNK cells had greatly enhanced functional capabilities, superior to conventional NK cells, and were highly responsive to cells infected with either HCMV or HSV-1. Remarkably, the gNK cell subset persisted for long-term at nearly constant levels in healthy individuals. Therefore, FcRγ-deficiency distinguishes an antibody-dependent memory-like NK cell subset with enhanced potential for broad anti-viral responses.

Introduction

NK cells are innate immune cells that contribute to host defense against viral infection and malignancy through rapid production of cytokines and the release of cytotoxic granules (1). In particular, NK cells play a crucial role in the control of herpesvirus infection, such as infection by HCMV (24). Despite being categorized as innate immune cells with relatively short lifespan (estimated at 10–20 d) (5, 6), recent studies of mouse models demonstrate adaptive immune features of NK cells, such as recall responses to certain haptens and viral antigens lasting up to several months (79). However, considering the fact that NK cells lack mechanisms for gene-rearrangement to generate antigen-specific receptors, the molecular basis for specific target recognition is poorly understood, and whether NK cells can mount memory responses to diverse pathogens is unclear (1, 10).

Recently, we found that about one-third of healthy individuals have circulating gNK cells that express CD3ζ normally but are deficient for FcRγ (11), the two signaling adaptors associated with the Fc receptor CD16 (12). In the present study, we provide evidence that gNK cells represent a distinct type of memory cell that primarily utilizes pathogen-specific antibodies instead of antigen-specific receptors for target recognition.

Materials and Methods

Human subjects and blood samples

PBMCs from healthy donors were obtained with informed consent or from discarded, de-identified leukoreduction filters (American Red Cross), as approved by the Michigan State University Biomedical and Health Institutional Review Board.

Phenotypic and functional analysis of NK cells

PBMCs were stained using antibodies for flow cytometry and CD56dimCD3CD14CD19 cells were gated as previously described (11). Briefly, cells were stained with antibodies for cell surface markers, then fixed in 2% formaldehyde. To distinguish gNK cells, samples were treated with permeabilization buffer containing 0.1% saponin, followed by staining of intracellular proteins, including FcRγ (anti-FcεRI, γ subunit, Millipore) and CD3ζ (clone 6B10.2, eBioscience). MRC-5 lung fibroblast or human foreskin fibroblasts (HFF) were cultured in 96-well plates, infected (MOI=1) with HCMV (Towne, or AD169) or HSV-1 for 2 h, then washed with PBS to remove unadsorbed virus. PBMCs were cultured for 1–5 d with HCMV-infected cells, or 40 h with HSV-1- infected cells, in the presence of recombinant human IL-2 (10 U/ml). 6 h prior to analysis, 1 μl plasma, or purified IgG (Nab Protein A Plus Purification Kit, Thermo Scientific) was added along with brefeldin A (for cytokine analysis) or anti-CD107a with monensin (for degranulation). To exclude dead cells, LIVE/DEAD Cell Stain Kit (Invitrogen) was used.

ELISA

Serological status of donor plasma was determined using ELISA kits (MP Biomedicals) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Statistics

The Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test was used for all assays except ELISAs, for which the chi-squared test was used. Differences were considered significant when p < 0.05 (GraphPad Prism).

Results and Discussion

Association between gNK cells and HCMV infection

To explore the origin of gNK cells, we compared the phenotypic characteristics of conventional NK cells, which express FcRγ, and gNK cells from healthy donors. Analysis of killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs), which are expressed by subsets of NK cells (13), showed that gNK cells had predominant expression of particular KIRs in many donors (Supplemental Fig. 1), suggesting that the gNK cell subset is an outcome of expansion.

Considering the expansion and presence of gNK cells in about one-third of healthy donors (11), we hypothesized that the presence of gNK cells might be associated with prior infection by a common pathogen that does not cause illness in the presence of normal immune function. Previously, we found that compared to conventional NK cells, gNK cells display markedly lower levels of NKp30 and NKp46 (11), the natural cytotoxicity receptors (NCR) associated with FcRγ (14). Interestingly, a subset of NK cells with a similar NCRlo phenotype has been found in HCMV- seropositive but not in HCMV-seronegative individuals (15). To examine the possible association of gNK cells with HCMV, we tested for HCMV-specific antibodies in the plasma of 42 healthy donors, among which 17 donors had gNK cells. HCMV-seropositivity correlated strongly with the presence of gNK cells (p<0.0001); all donors with gNK cells, except for one, were seropositive for HCMV IgG (Fig. 1A). By contrast, seropositivity for HSV-1 or HSV-2, two common herpesviruses, did not correlate with the presence of gNK cells. Among the donors with gNK cells, only 2 donors were weakly positive for HCMV IgM (data not shown), suggesting that most of these seropositive donors did not have a recent HCMV infection. Analysis of the one HCMV-seronegative donor with gNK cells revealed a substantial number of memory T cells specific for the immunogenic HCMV tegument protein pp65 (data not shown) (16), indicating that this donor had also been exposed previously to HCMV. Thus, the presence of gNK cells is strongly associated with previous exposure to HCMV.

FIGURE 1. Association of gNK cells with prior HCMV infection.

FIGURE 1

(A) Frequencies of gNK cells among the CD56dimCD3CD14CD19 population within individual donors grouped according to IgG serological status for HCMV, HSV-1, or HSV-2 (n=42), (**p<0.0001, ns; not significant). (B) Comparison of marker expression on conventional NK (○) and g-NK (●) cells within CD56dimCD3CD14CD19 population. Dot graphs show mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of indicated markers (*p<0.01, **p<0.0001).

Unlike conventional NK cells, gNK cells showed predominant expression of NKG2C in many, but not all, donors (Fig. 1B). Notably, previous studies have shown that HCMV seropositive donors tend to have elevated numbers of NKG2C+ NK cells, which express high levels of CD57 and infrequent NKG2A (1517). In line with this, gNK cells also expressed high CD57 and low NKG2A levels regardless of NKG2C expression.

Requirement of antibodies for superior responsiveness of gNK cells to HCMV-infected cells

Given the association with HCMV infection, we next sought to determine whether gNK cells respond better than conventional NK cells to HCMV-infected cells. NK cell responsiveness was evaluated by examining intracellular IFN-γ after incubation of PBMCs with lung fibroblasts (MRC-5) either mock-infected or infected with the Towne strain of HCMV (18). While the overall production of IFN-γ by NK cells was slightly increased over background, gNK cells produced less IFN-γthan conventional NK cells (Fig. 2A). Lower responsiveness of gNK cells was also observed with a different strain of HCMV (AD169) as well as different host cells (Supplemental Fig. 2A). These data indicate that gNK cells do not respond well to direct stimulation by HCMV-infected target cells.

FIGURE 2. gNK cells display enhanced effector functions in response to HCMV-infected cells in the presence of HCMV-specific antibodies.

FIGURE 2

PBMCs were cultured with mock- or HCMV-infected MRC-5 cells as indicated. (A and B) Flow cytometric analysis of IFN-γ production by conventional NK and gNK cells from a representative donor following 3 d incubation. Inset values represent the relative percentage of IFN-γ+ NK cells. Line graphs show the percentages of conventional NK (○) or gNK (●) cells that produced IFN-γ+ from several donors in the absence (A) or presence (B) of autologous plasma or purified IgG (Ab) as indicated. Dots connected by a line designate the same donor sample (**p<0.01). (C) Production of TNF-α by conventional NK or gNK cells in the presence or absence of autologous plasma or purified IgG from several donors (**p<0.01). (D) Expression of CD107a in the presence or absence of autologous plasma or purified IgG following 2 d incubation (*p<0.05, **p<0.01).

Since we previously found that gNK cells responded robustly to stimulation through mAb-mediated crosslinking of CD16 (11), we examined whether the presence of naturally-occurring antibodies against HCMV would impact gNK cell responses. Using flow cytometry, we first confirmed the presence, albeit different concentrations, of antibodies that bound to HCMV-infected cells in the plasma of seropositive donors (data not shown). Addition of autologous plasma led to dramatic production of IFN-γby gNK cells at levels significantly (p<0.01) higher than conventional NK cells (Fig. 2B). Although there was notable variation, presumably reflecting variations in antibody concentrations and subclasses between donors, the gNK cells responded more robustly than conventional NK cells from all donors tested. The enhancing effects of plasma were dependent on the presence of infected cells, since plasma with mock-infected cells did not induce such responses. Addition of antibodies purified from autologous plasma also led to similarly high production of IFN-γby gNK cells (Fig. 2B). These data indicate that plasma from all seropositive donors tested contained antibodies specific for viral antigen(s) expressed on the surface of infected cells that and triggered cytokine production through CD16. The higher responses of gNK cells were also observed with the AD169 strain as well as with different host cells in the presence of plasma (Supplemental Fig. 2B, 2C). This robust responsiveness of gNK cells was consistently observed over a wide range of concentrations of plasma and at different time points (data not shown). Furthermore, gNK cells produced significantly (p<0.01) higher levels of TNF-α compared to conventional NK cells in the presence of plasma or purified antibody (Fig. 2C; Supplemental Fig. 2B, 2C).

To assess the cytolytic potential of NK cells, we examined the expression of CD107a, a degranulation marker, following incubation with HCMV-infected target cells. In the absence of antibody, the degranulation response of gNK cells was significantly (p<0.01) lower than conventional NK cells (Fig. 2D). Compatible with our data, NKG2C+ NK cells in HCMV-seropositive donors were previously shown to respond poorly to HCMV-infected cells (19, 20). By contrast, in the presence of plasma or purified antibody, gNK cells showed higher levels of CD107a (p<0.05), compared to conventional NK cells (Fig. 2D). Therefore, direct recognition is unlikely to be the primary mechanism for gNK cell reactivity against HCMV-infected cells, and the enhanced cytokine and degranulation responses of gNK cells to HCMV-infected targets are antibody-dependent. Taken together, the association with prior HCMV infection and enhanced antibody-dependent functional responsiveness of gNK cells reveal distinct adaptive immune features that may lead to enhanced recall responses during reactivation or re-infection by HCMV.

Enhanced effector responses of gNK cells to HSV-1-infected cells in the presence of virus-specific antibodies

Given the augmented responsiveness in the presence of HCMV-specific antibodies, we reasoned that gNK cells could also respond robustly to other pathogens when pathogen-specific antibodies are available. To test this possibility, PBMCs from HSV-1 seropositive donors were co-cultured with HSV-1-infected cells in the presence or absence of autologous plasma. Similar to the HCMV-infection setting, IFN-γ production by gNK cells was significantly higher (p<0.05) than from conventional NK cells in the presence of seropositive plasma (Fig. 3A, 3B). This plasma effect was antibody-specific, because the addition of autologous plasma lacking HSV-1-specific antibodies did not elicit such responses from HSV-1 naïve gNK cells (Fig. 3B). These data indicate that the plasma from HSV-1-seropositive donors contained antibodies specific for HSV-1-derived antigen(s) on infected cells, and gNK cells respond to HSV-1-infected target cells more robustly than conventional NK cells in an HSV-1-specific antibody-dependent manner.

FIGURE 3. Enhanced effector responses of gNK cells to HSV-1-infected target cells in the presence of virus-specific antibodies.

FIGURE 3

(A) Dot plots from one representative sample depict relative percentages of IFN-γ+ conventional NK and gNK cells in the presence of autologous plasma after culture with HSV-1-infected MRC-5 cells. (B) Relative frequencies of IFN-γ+ conventional NK (○) and gNK (●) cells from anti-HSV-1+ (n=6) or anti-HSV-1- donors (n=4) cultured with HSV-1-infected MRC-5 cells in the presence or absence of autologous plasma. Dots connected by a line designate the same donor sample (*p<0.05). (C) IFN-γ production by gNK and conventional NK cells from a representative HSV-1 seronegative donor in the presence of purified allogenic IgG following co-culture with HSV-1- or HCMV-infected target cells. The anti-viral specificities of the plasma sources for purified IgG are indicated. All co-cultures were for 40 h.

To examine whether gNK cells from HSV-1 naïve donors could respond to HSV-1-infected cells, antibodies were purified from non-autologous plasma and tested for the ability to enhance cytokine production. The addition of antibodies purified from HSV-1-seropositive donors led to greatly enhanced IFN-γproduction by gNK cells over conventional NK cells from HSV-1-naïve donors co-cultured with HSV-1-infected cells (Fig. 3C). By contrast, antibodies lacking HSV-1 reactivity did not yield such responses. In parallel experiments, the addition of non-autologous HCMV-specific antibodies led to enhanced responses from gNK cells cultured on HCMV-infected cells as expected. These data indicate that gNK cells, regardless of prior exposure, can mount more potent functional responses to virus-infected cells than conventional NK cells if virus-specific antibodies are provided. Thus, gNK cells have enhanced potential to mediate antibody-dependent cross-protection against a broad spectrum of viral infections.

Long-term persistence of g-NK cells

We next sought to determine if gNK cells comprise a transient or stable population. Longitudinal studies showed that the relative frequencies of gNK cells within the NK cell pool, as well as their absolute numbers, were nearly constant for 4–9 months after original assessments (Fig. 4A, 4B). The subset composition of gNK cells was also stable, and there was no discernible change in functional responsiveness at these time points (data not shown). For donors that initially had no detectable gNK cells (n=7), there was no appearance of gNK cells over this period (data not shown). With respect to abundance, certain donors maintained large numbers of gNK cells, in some cases exceeding the number of recirculating memory CD8+CD45RO+ T cells (Fig. 4B). These results indicate that the size of the gNK cell pool is maintained long-termwith no indication of decline, an important feature of memory-type cells. Since the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 is important for NK cell survival (5, 21), and is also elevated in memory CD8+ T cells (22), we analyzed expression of this protein. In all donors (n=11), gNK cells expressed significantly higher levels (p< 0.01) of Bcl-2 than conventional NK cells (Fig. 4C). Analysis of the activation marker CD38, together with our previous data showing no detectable expression of activation markers CD69 and CD25, indicated that gNK cells were not in an activated state (Fig. 4D). Finally, we analyzed several markers that have been associated with memory T cells (23). Although gNK cells did not express CD45RO, CCR7, or CD127, the levels of CD44, CD11a and CCR5 were higher on gNK cells compared to conventional NK cells (Fig. 4D, data not shown), reminiscent of the differences between naïve and memory T cells (23). Together, gNK cells appear to be long-lived quiescent memory-type cells.

FIGURE 4. gNK cells persist for long-term at nearly constant levels.

FIGURE 4

(A) Percentages of g NK cells among total NK cells collected at the initial time point and 4, 5 or 9 m later from healthy donors (n=9). (B) Absolute number of indicated subsets among 1×106 lymphocytes collected at initial time point (T1) and 4 or 5 m later (T2). Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the means (n=7). (C) Expression analysis of Bcl-2 in conventional NK and gNK cells from one representative donor. Shaded peak is from control staining. Line graph shows the MFI of Bcl-2 expression (n=11) in conventional NK (○) and gNK (●) cells. Dots connected by a line indicate the same donor sample (*p<0.01). (D) Marker expression on conventional NK and gNK cells. Line graphs show MFI of indicated markers (*p<0.01, **p<0.001).

Collectively, our study reveals memory features of gNK cells distinct from other memory cells. Unlike classical memory cells that use gene-rearranged antigen-specific receptors, gNK cells utilize the germline-encoded Fc receptor that recognizes antibodies bound to target cells. Moreover, gNK cells are unlikely related to antigen-specific memory NK cells described in mouse models (79), since FcRγ-deficiency abrogates CD16 expression on murine NK cells (24), and these memory-type NK cells disappear with a constant rate of decay (25). Importantly, the responses of gNK cells are not restricted to a specific pathogen as antigen specificity is conferred through antigen-specific antibodies. Given the persistence and enhanced capabilities, gNK cells are poised to impact the host immune response to diverse pathogens for long-term, particularly during later stages of primary infection, re-infection or chronic infection where pathogen-specific antibodies are available. Thus, gNK cells may represent a new class of memory cells, which does not depend on antigen-specific receptors, for which FcRγ-deficiency itself provides a molecular signature. Finally, gNK cells may have important implications for antibody-based therapies for infectious diseases and cancer, where the enhanced responsiveness of gNK cells to antibody could significantly impact therapeutic efficacy.

Supplementary Material

1

Acknowledgments

We thank J. Drach and J. Breitenbach (University of Michigan) for virus stocks and host cells, P. Wallace for phlebotomy services, B. Siegfried and the American Red Cross for leukoreduction filters, A. Kim and T. Kakarla for technical support, K. Meek for critical reading of the manuscript, and W. Esselman for discussion and advice.

Abbreviations used in this article

gNK

FcRγ-deficient NK cell

HCMV

human cytomegalovirus

KIR

killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor

Footnotes

1

This work was supported by funding from the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health (5R21CA149476), Michigan State University, and National Agenda Project grant from the Korea Research Council of Fundamental Science & Technology, Republic of Korea, all to S.K.

References

  • 1.Vivier E, Raulet DH, Moretta A, Caligiuri MA, Zitvogel L, Lanier LL, Yokoyama WM, Ugolini S. Innate or adaptive immunity? The example of natural killer cells. Science. 2011;331:44–49. doi: 10.1126/science.1198687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Biron CA, Byron KS, Sullivan JL. Severe herpesvirus infections in an adolescent without natural killer cells. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:1731–1735. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198906293202605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Etzioni A, Eidenschenk C, Katz R, Beck R, Casanova JL, Pollack S. Fatal varicella associated with selective natural killer cell deficiency. J Pediatr. 2005;146:423–425. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.11.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kuijpers TW, Baars PA, Dantin C, van den Burg M, van Lier RA, Roosnek E. Human NK cells can control CMV infection in the absence of T cells. Blood. 2008;112:914–915. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-05-157354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ranson T, Vosshenrich CA, Corcuff E, Richard O, Muller W, Di Santo JP. IL-15 is an essential mediator of peripheral NK-cell homeostasis. Blood. 2003;101:4887–4893. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-11-3392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jamieson AM, Isnard P, Dorfman JR, Coles MC, Raulet DH. Turnover and proliferation of NK cells in steady state and lymphopenic conditions. J Immunol. 2004;172:864–870. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.2.864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.O’Leary JG, Goodarzi M, Drayton DL, von Andrian UH. T cell- and B cell-independent adaptive immunity mediated by natural killer cells. Nat Immunol. 2006;7:507–516. doi: 10.1038/ni1332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sun JC, Beilke JN, Lanier LL. Adaptive immune features of natural killer cells. Nature. 2009;457:557–561. doi: 10.1038/nature07665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Paust S, Gill HS, Wang BZ, Flynn MP, Moseman EA, Senman B, Szczepanik M, Telenti A, Askenase PW, Compans RW, von Andrian UH. Critical role for the chemokine receptor CXCR6 in NK cell-mediated antigen-specific memory of haptens and viruses. Nat Immunol. 2010;11:1127–1135. doi: 10.1038/ni.1953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cooper MA, Yokoyama WM. Memory-like responses of natural killer cells. Immunol Rev. 2010;235:297–305. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2010.00891.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hwang I, Zhang T, Scott JM, Kim AR, Lee T, Kakarla T, Kim A, Sunwoo JB, Kim S. Identification of human NK cells that are deficient for signaling adaptor FcRgamma and specialized for antibody-dependent immune functions. Int Immunol. 2012 doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxs080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lanier LL. Up on the tightrope: natural killer cell activation and inhibition. Nat Immunol. 2008;9:495–502. doi: 10.1038/ni1581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Parham P. MHC class I molecules and KIRs in human history, health and survival. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005;5:201–214. doi: 10.1038/nri1570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Moretta L, Bottino C, Pende D, Castriconi R, Mingari MC, Moretta A. Surface NK receptors and their ligands on tumor cells. Seminars in immunology. 2006;18:151–158. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2006.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Guma M, Angulo A, Vilches C, Gomez-Lozano N, Malats N, Lopez-Botet M. Imprint of human cytomegalovirus infection on the NK cell receptor repertoire. Blood. 2004;104:3664–3671. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-05-2058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lopez-Verges S, Milush JM, Schwartz BS, Pando MJ, Jarjoura J, York VA, Houchins JP, Miller S, Kang SM, Norris PJ, Nixon DF, Lanier LL. Expansion of a unique CD57NKG2Chi natural killer cell subset during acute human cytomegalovirus infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:14725–14732. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1110900108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Beziat V, Dalgard O, Asselah T, Halfon P, Bedossa P, Boudifa A, Hervier B, Theodorou I, Martinot M, Debre P, Bjorkstrom NK, Malmberg KJ, Marcellin P, Vieillard V. CMV drives clonal expansion of NKG2C+ NK cells expressing self-specific KIRs in chronic hepatitis patients. Eur J Immunol. 2010;42:447–457. doi: 10.1002/eji.201141826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cha TA, Tom E, Kemble GW, Duke GM, Mocarski ES, Spaete RR. Human cytomegalovirus clinical isolates carry at least 19 genes not found in laboratory strains. J Virol. 1996;70:78–83. doi: 10.1128/jvi.70.1.78-83.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Magri G, Muntasell A, Romo N, Saez-Borderias A, Pende D, Geraghty DE, Hengel H, Angulo A, Moretta A, Lopez-Botet M. NKp46 and DNAM-1 NK-cell receptors drive the response to human cytomegalovirus-infected myeloid dendritic cells overcoming viral immune evasion strategies. Blood. 2011;117:848–856. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-08-301374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Petersen L, Petersen CC, Moller-Larsen A, Hokland ME. Short-term exposure to human cytomegalovirus-infected fibroblasts induces a proportional increase of active CD94/NKG2A(+) natural killer cells. Hum Immunol. 2010;71:29–35. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2009.09.355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cooper MA, Bush JE, Fehniger TA, VanDeusen JB, Waite RE, Liu Y, Aguila HL, Caligiuri MA. In vivo evidence for a dependence on interleukin 15 for survival of natural killer cells. Blood. 2002;100:3633–3638. doi: 10.1182/blood-2001-12-0293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Grayson JM, Zajac AJ, Altman JD, Ahmed R. Cutting edge: increased expression of Bcl-2 in antigen-specific memory CD8+ T cells. J Immunol. 2000;164:3950–3954. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.8.3950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sallusto F, Lenig D, Forster R, Lipp M, Lanzavecchia A. Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions. Nature. 1999;401:708–712. doi: 10.1038/44385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Takai T, Li M, Sylvestre D, Clynes R, Ravetch JV. FcR gamma chain deletion results in pleiotrophic effector cell defects. Cell. 1994;76:519–529. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90115-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Schlub TE, Sun JC, Walton SM, Robbins SH, Pinto AK, Munks MW, Hill AB, Brossay L, Oxenius A, Davenport MP. Comparing the kinetics of NK cells, CD4, and CD8 T cells in murine cytomegalovirus infection. J Immunol. 2011;187:1385–1392. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1100416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES