Skip to main content
Journal of Virology logoLink to Journal of Virology
. 2013 May;87(9):4938–4951. doi: 10.1128/JVI.03183-12

Worldwide Phylogenetic Relationship of Avian Poxviruses

Miklós Gyuranecz a,, Jeffrey T Foster b, Ádám Dán c, Hon S Ip d, Kristina F Egstad d, Patricia G Parker e, Jenni M Higashiguchi e, Michael A Skinner f, Ursula Höfle g, Zsuzsa Kreizinger a, Gerry M Dorrestein h, Szabolcs Solt i, Endre Sós j, Young Jun Kim k, Marcela Uhart l, Ariel Pereda m, Gisela González-Hein n, Hector Hidalgo n, Juan-Manuel Blanco o, Károly Erdélyi c
PMCID: PMC3624294  PMID: 23408635

Abstract

Poxvirus infections have been found in 230 species of wild and domestic birds worldwide in both terrestrial and marine environments. This ubiquity raises the question of how infection has been transmitted and globally dispersed. We present a comprehensive global phylogeny of 111 novel poxvirus isolates in addition to all available sequences from GenBank. Phylogenetic analysis of the Avipoxvirus genus has traditionally relied on one gene region (4b core protein). In this study we expanded the analyses to include a second locus (DNA polymerase gene), allowing for a more robust phylogenetic framework, finer genetic resolution within specific groups, and the detection of potential recombination. Our phylogenetic results reveal several major features of avipoxvirus evolution and ecology and propose an updated avipoxvirus taxonomy, including three novel subclades. The characterization of poxviruses from 57 species of birds in this study extends the current knowledge of their host range and provides the first evidence of the phylogenetic effect of genetic recombination of avipoxviruses. The repeated occurrence of avian family or order-specific grouping within certain clades (e.g., starling poxvirus, falcon poxvirus, raptor poxvirus, etc.) indicates a marked role of host adaptation, while the sharing of poxvirus species within prey-predator systems emphasizes the capacity for cross-species infection and limited host adaptation. Our study provides a broad and comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of the Avipoxvirus genus, an ecologically and environmentally important viral group, to formulate a genome sequencing strategy that will clarify avipoxvirus taxonomy.

INTRODUCTION

Avian pox is a viral disease affecting more than 230 species in 23 orders of wild and domesticated birds (1). Poxviruses were identified as causative agents of pox lesions almost a century ago (2, 3), but understanding of their phylogenetics and epidemiology remains rudimentary. The genomes of only two well-diverged avian poxviruses (isolated from chicken and canaries) have thus far been sequenced. All avian poxviruses (avipoxviruses) are assigned to the genus Avipoxvirus in the subfamily Chordopoxvirinae of the Poxviridae family. Within the Avipoxvirus genus there are currently 10 recognized species (established primarily in the presequence era, with subsequent limited use of restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis): Fowlpox virus, Canarypox virus, Juncopox virus, Mynahpox virus, Psittacinepox virus, Sparrowpox virus, Starlingpox virus, Pigeonpox virus, Turkeypox virus, and Quailpox virus, according to the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (www.ictvonline.org). The exact number of existing avipoxvirus species, strains, and variants is unknown, since new isolates continue to be identified from a wide variety of avian species, such as Berthelot's pipit (Anthus berthelotii) (4), lesser flamingos (Phoenicopterus minor) (5), or crested serpent eagle (Spilornis cheela) (6).

Avian pox infections cause significant economic losses in domestic poultry due to decreased egg production, reduced growth, blindness, and increased mortality (7). Effects of avian pox on wild bird species can also be severe. The infection may produce several negative effects including elevated predation among affected birds (8), secondary infections, trauma, reduced male mating success (9) and death (10). The lifestyle of wild birds allows avian poxviruses to reach new hosts through bird migration, species introductions, and habitat change. Avian pox has been identified as an important risk factor in the conservation of small and endangered populations, particularly in island bird species (4). The impact of the introduction of avian pox has been disastrous for the avifauna of various archipelagos (11). Poxvirus infection has been responsible for the population decline of native bird species on Hawaii (12), Galápagos (2, 13), and the Canary Islands (14). Avian pox has also been identified as a risk factor in the reintroduction programs of houbara bustard (Chlamydotis undulata macqueenii) in the Middle East, Floreana mockingbirds (Mimus trifasciatus) in Galapagos (15, 16), and peregrine falcons (Falco peregrinus) in Germany (17). The recent emergence of an epizootic of conspicuous and distinctive avian pox among great tits (Parus major) in the United Kingdom (18), and its penetrance of a historically well-studied population near Oxford, allowed detailed study of the epidemiology (19) and population-level impacts (20) of the disease in wild birds.

The currently available vaccines against fowlpox, canarypox, pigeon pox, and quail pox are each produced using virus strains isolated from the respective avian group. There is an increasing demand for new vaccines against avian poxvirus infections to help protect a wide range of birds, especially endangered species (21).

Fowlpox virus is the type species of the Avipoxvirus genus. The complete genomic sequences of Fowlpox virus (AF198100) (22) and Canarypox virus (AY318871) (23) are available. The two genomes are highly diverged, sharing only ca. 70% sequence identity. The 365-kbp genome of Canarypox virus is larger than that of Fowlpox virus (288 kbp) and shows significant differences in gene content, particularly in the expansion and diversification of some gene families that are already large in Fowlpox virus, notably the ankyrin repeat proteins (19). The phylogenetic relationships among avipoxviruses are only partially characterized. Comparative analysis of genomic sequences is the most informative and reliable method for comparing closely related viral genomes, so a definite phylogeny will have to await additional genome sequencing. The relationships of avian poxviruses isolated from free-ranging birds have been analyzed using DNA sequences of the 4b core protein coding genomic region (21, 2427). Until recently, the significant divergence among avipoxviruses impeded the efforts to identify other pan-genus PCR primers. Jarmin et al. (25) and Manarolla et al. (21) sequenced the fpv140 locus (FPV140 gene; virion envelope protein, p35) of some avian poxvirus strains, while Thiel et al. (13) sequenced the intergenic region between CA.X (CNPV114 gene; HT motif protein), and TK (CNPV113 gene; thymidine kinase) genes. Unfortunately, these markers appeared to fail to identify some clades or subclades that were identified by the 4b core protein-based PCR system. These phylogenetic studies have concluded that the vast majority of avian poxvirus isolates clustered into three major clades, represented by the Fowlpox virus (clade A), the Canarypox virus (clade B), and the Psittacinepox virus (clade C). However, other pan-genus markers, similar to the 4b core protein coding genomic region, are needed in order to achieve a more robust phylogenetic classification of avian poxviruses.

This study was aimed at identifying another such pan-genus marker from the wider set of genomic core genes (the DNA polymerase gene) and combining it with sequences from the 4b region to provide a robust and global phylogenetic framework for the study and classification of avian poxviruses. Our analysis included partial 4b core protein and DNA polymerase gene sequences of virus strains isolated from natural pox infection cases occurring in 111 wild and captive birds from 57 different species sampled in North and South America, Europe, Asia, Antarctica, and the Pacific Ocean.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample collection and preparation.

Samples were collected by biopsy or during postmortem examinations from a wide range of clinically ill or dead birds in the United States, Ecuador (Galapagos Islands), Argentina, Chile, Hungary, Spain, Netherlands, Belgium, United Kingdom, South Korea, and Antarctica (Table 1). Tissue samples were frozen at −20 or −80°C or fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin blocks.

Table 1.

List of samples with their information and GenBank accession numbers of derived sequences used in the study

Subclade (clade)a Sample code GenBank ID
English name Latin name Order Family Originb Yr Pox lesion category Source for DNA extraction
4b core protein gene sequence DNA polymerase gene sequence
A1 P1 KC017960 KC017850 Domestic fowl Gallus domesticus Galliformes Phasianidae Hungary 2003 Cutaneous Skin lesion
A1 P2 KC017961 KC017866 Domestic turkey Meleagris gallopavo Galliformes Phasianidae Nevada (USA) 2005 Cutaneous-oral mucosa Tissue culture
A1 P3 KC017962 KC017867 Domestic fowl Gallus domesticus Galliformes Phasianidae Hawaii (USA) 1996 Cutaneous Tissue culture
A1 P4 KC017963 KC017883 Superb parrot Polytelis swainsonii Psittaciformes Psittacidae Chile 2004 Cutaneous CAM
A1 P5 KC017964 KC017851 Blue-eared pheasant Crossoptilon auritum Galliformes Phasianidae Hungary 2005 Cutaneous Skin lesion
A2 P6 KC017965 KC017868 Rock dove Columba livia Columbiformes Columbidae Hawaii (USA) 1994 Cutaneous Skin lesion
A2 P7 KC017966 KC017885 Rock dove Columba livia Columbiformes Columbidae Georgia (USA) 1995 Cutaneous Tissue culture
A2 P8 KC017967 KC017852 Eastern imperial eagle Aquila heliaca Accipitriformes Accipitridae Hungary 2000 Cutaneous Skin lesion
A2 P9 KC017968 KC017853 Rock dove Columba livia Columbiformes Columbidae Hungary 2003 Cutaneous Skin lesion
A2 P10 KC017969 KC017854 Rock dove Columba livia Columbiformes Columbidae Hungary Unknown Unknown Unknown
A2 P11 KC017970 KC017855 Great bustard Otis tarda Gruiformes Otidae Hungary 2003 Cutaneous Skin lesion
A2 P12 KC017971 KC017856 Rock dove Columba livia Columbiformes Columbidae Hungary 2005 Cutaneous Skin lesion
A2 P13 KC017972 KC017886 Oriental turtle-dove Streptopelia orientalis Columbiformes Columbidae South Korea Unknown Cutaneous Skin lesion
A2 P14 KC017973 KC017887 Oriental turtle-dove Streptopelia orientalis Columbiformes Columbidae South Korea Unknown Cutaneous Skin lesion
A2 P15 KC017974 KC017890 Great bustard Otis tarda Gruiformes Otidae Spain 2003 Cutaneous Skin lesion
A2 P16 KC017975 KC017857 Indian peafowl Pavo cristatus Galliformes Phasianidae Hungary 2003 Cutaneous-oral mucosa Skin lesion
A2 P17 KC017976 KC017891 Booted eagle Hieraaetus pennatus Accipitriformes Accipitridae Spain 2000 Cutaneous CAM
A2 P18 KC017977 KC017892 Red-legged partridge Alectoris rufa Galliformes Phasianidae Spain 2000 Cutaneous Skin lesion
A2 P19 KC017978 KC017893 Red kite Milvus milvus Accipitriformes Accipitridae Spain 2003 Cutaneous CAM
A2 P20 KC017979 KC017894 Booted eagle Hieraaetus pennatus Accipitriformes Accipitridae Spain 2003 Cutaneous CAM
A2 P21 KC017980 KC017895 Red-legged partridge Alectoris rufa Galliformes Phasianidae Spain 2002 Cutaneous CAM
A3 P22 KC017981 KC017898 Southern giant petrel Macronectes giganteus Procellariiformes Procellariidae Antarctica 2004 Cutaneous-oral mucosa CAM
A3 P23 KC017982 KC017899 Pelagic cormorant Phalacrocorax pelagicus Suliformes Phalacrocoracidae Alaska (USA) 1989 Cutaneous CAM
A3 P24 KC017983 KC017888 Eurasian eagle owl Bubo bubo Strigiformes Strigidae South Korea Unknown Cutaneous Skin lesion
A3 P25 KC017984 KC017889 Eurasian eagle owl Bubo bubo Strigiformes Strigidae South Korea Unknown Cutaneous Skin lesion
A3 P26 KC017985 KC017902 Common murre Uria aalge Charadriiformes Alcidae Washington (USA) 1991 Cutaneous-oral mucosa Tissue culture
A3 P27 KC017986 KC017904 Laysan albatross Phoebastria immutabilis Procellariiformes Diomedeidae Midway Islands (USA) 1983 Cutaneous CAM
A3 P28 KC017987 KC017905 Magellanic penguin Spheniscus magellanicus Sphenisciformes Spheniscidae Argentina 2007 Cutaneous Skin lesion
A4 P29 KC017988 KC017858 Peregrine falcon Falco peregrinus Falconiformes Falconidae Hungary 2005 Cutaneous Skin lesion
A4 P30 KC017989 KC017859 Red-footed falcon Falco vespertinus Falconiformes Falconidae Hungary 2007 Cutaneous Skin lesion
A5 P31 KC017990 KC017906 Trumpeter swan Cygnus buccinator Anseriformes Anatidae Wisconsin (USA) 1991 Cutaneous Tissue culture
A5 P32 KC017991 KC017920 Mottled duck Anas fulvigula Anseriformes Anatidae Texas (USA) 2005 Cutaneous Skin lesion
A5 P33 KC017992 KC017907 Blue-winged teal Anas discors Anseriformes Anatidae Wisconsin (USA) 1991 Cutaneous Tissue culture
A5 P34 KC017993 KC017908 Redhead duck Aythya americana Anseriformes Anatidae Wisconsin (USA) 1991 Cutaneous Tissue culture
A5 P35 KC017994 KC017924 Mallard duck Anas platyrhynchos Anseriformes Anatidae New York (USA) 1994 Cutaneous Skin lesion
A5 P36 KC017995 KC017909 Trumpeter swan Cygnus buccinator Anseriformes Anatidae Wisconsin (USA) 1989 Unknown CAM
A5 P37 KC017996 KC017910 Wood duck Aix sponsa Anseriformes Anatidae Wisconsin (USA) 1991 Cutaneous Skin lesion
A6 P38 KC017997 KC017926 Mourning dove Zenaida macroura Columbiformes Columbidae Illinois (USA) 1993 Cutaneous CAM
A6 P39 KC017998 KC017928 Mourning dove Zenaida macroura Columbiformes Columbidae California (USA) 1993 Oral mucosa Tissue culture
A6 P40 KC017999 KC017911 Mourning dove Zenaida macroura Columbiformes Columbidae Wisconsin (USA) 1994 Cutaneous Skin lesion
A6 P41 KC018000 KC017912 Mourning dove Zenaida macroura Columbiformes Columbidae Wisconsin (USA) 1987 Cutaneous Tissue culture
A6 P42 KC018001 KC017929 Rock dove Columba livia Columbiformes Columbidae California (USA) 1980 Cutaneous Skin lesion
A6 P43 KC018002 KC017913 Canada goose Branta canadensis Anseriformes Anatidae Wisconsin (USA) 1992 Cutaneous Tissue culture
A7 P44 KC018003 KC017932 Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Accipitriformes Accipitridae Florida (USA) 1993 Cutaneous Tissue culture
A7 P45 KC018004 KC017933 Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Accipitriformes Accipitridae Florida (USA) 1992 Cutaneous Tissue culture
A7 P46 KC018005 KC017935 Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Accipitriformes Accipitridae Minnesota (USA) 1993 Cutaneous Skin lesion
A7 P47 KC018006 KC017914 Red-tailed hawk Buteo jamaicensis Accipitriformes Accipitridae Wisconsin (USA) 1985 Cutaneous Skin lesion
A7 P48 KC018007 KC017934 Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Accipitriformes Accipitridae Florida (USA) 1989 Cutaneous Tissue culture
A7 P49 KC018008 KC017860 Northern goshawk Accipiter gentilis Accipitriformes Accipitridae Hungary 2003 Cutaneous Skin lesion
A7 P50 KC018009 KC017861 Common buzzard Buteo buteo Accipitriformes Accipitridae Hungary 2000 Cutaneous Skin lesion
A7 P51 KC018010 KC017896 Red kite Milvus milvus Accipitriformes Accipitridae Spain 2000 Cutaneous Skin lesion
A7 P52 KC018011 KC017900 Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Accipitriformes Accipitridae Alaska (USA) 1981 Cutaneous CAM
A7 P53 KC018012 KC017901 Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Accipitriformes Accipitridae Alaska (USA) 1991 Oral mucosa Tissue culture
A7 P54 KC018013 KC017915 Mallard duck Anas platyrhynchos Anseriformes Anatidae Wisconsin (USA) 1991 Cutaneous Skin lesion
B1 P55 KC018014 KC017869 Canary Serinus canaria Passeriformes Fringillidae Hawaii (USA) 1996 Cutaneous Tissue culture
B1 P56 KC018015 KC017870 Canary Serinus canaria Passeriformes Fringillidae Hawaii (USA) 1996 Cutaneous Tissue culture
B1 P57 KC018016 KC017871 Canary Serinus canaria Passeriformes Fringillidae Hawaii (USA) 1996 Cutaneous Tissue culture
B1 P58 KC018017 KC017872 Canary Serinus canaria Passeriformes Fringillidae Hawaii (USA) 1996 Cutaneous Tissue culture
B1 P59 KC018018 KC017873 Apapane Himatione sanguinea Passeriformes Fringillidae Hawaii (USA) 1996 Cutaneous Tissue culture
B1 P60 KC018019 KC017874 Canary Serinus canaria Passeriformes Fringillidae Hawaii (USA) 1996 Cutaneous Tissue culture
B1 P61 KC018020 KC017875 Apapane Himatione sanguinea Passeriformes Fringillidae Hawaii (USA) 1996 Cutaneous Tissue culture
B1 P62 KC018021 KC017876 Canary Serinus canaria Passeriformes Fringillidae Hawaii (USA) 1996 Cutaneous Tissue culture
B1 P63 KC018022 KC017936 Dark-eyed junco Junco hyemalis hyemalis Passeriformes Emberizidae Utah (USA) 1986 Cutaneous CAM
B1 P64 KC018023 KC017938 House finch Carpodacus mexicanus Passeriformes Fringillidae Arizona (USA) 1991 Cutaneous Tissue culture
B1 P65 KC018024 KC017942 House finch Carpodacus mexicanus Passeriformes Fringillidae Oregon (USA) 1995 Cutaneous Tissue culture
B1 P66 KC018025 KC017939 House finch Carpodacus mexicanus Passeriformes Fringillidae Arizona (USA) 1996 Cutaneous Tissue culture
B1 P67 KC018026 KC017943 House finch Carpodacus mexicanus Passeriformes Fringillidae Oregon (USA) 1998 Cutaneous Tissue culture
B1 P68 KC018027 KC017944 House finch Carpodacus mexicanus Passeriformes Fringillidae Oregon (USA) 1998 Cutaneous Tissue culture
B1 P69 KC018028 KC017937 House finch Carpodacus mexicanus Passeriformes Fringillidae Utah (USA) 2001 Cutaneous Tissue culture
B1 P70 KC018029 KC017940 House finch Carpodacus mexicanus Passeriformes Fringillidae Arizona (USA) 2001 Cutaneous Tissue culture
B1 P71 KC018030 KC017903 House finch Carpodacus mexicanus Passeriformes Fringillidae Washington (USA) 1988 Cutaneous Tissue culture
B1 P72 KC018031 KC017945 American crow Corvus brachyrhynchos, Passeriformes Corvidae Washington, DC (USA) 1999 Cutaneous Tissue culture
B1 P73 KC018032 KC017877 House finch Carpodacus mexicanus Passeriformes Fringillidae Hawaii (USA) 1987 Cutaneous Tissue culture
B1 P74 KC018033 KC017946 Medium ground finch Geospiza fortis Passeriformes Emberizidae Galapagos Islands (Ecuador) 2008 Cutaneous Skin lesion
B1 P75 KC018034 KC017947 Galapagos mockingbird Mimus parvulus Passeriformes Mimidae Galapagos Islands (Ecuador) 2008 Cutaneous Skin lesion
B1 P76 KC018035 KC017941 Northern (masked) bobwhite Colinus virginianus ridgwayi Galliformes Odontophoridae Arizona (USA) 1993 Conjunctiva, infraorbital sinus Tissue culture
B1 P77 KC018036 KC017950 American crow Corvus brachyrhynchos Passeriformes Corvidae Massachusetts (USA) 2008 spleen Spleen
B1 P78 KC018037 KC017951 Black-billed magpie Pica hudsonia Passeriformes Corvidae Colorado (USA) 1997 Lung Lung
B1 P79 KC018038 KC017952 Black-hooded siskin Carduelis atrata Passeriformes Fringillidae The Netherlands 2003 Cutaneous Paraffin-embedded tissue
B1 P80 KC018039 KC017930 Common raven Corvus corax Passeriformes Corvidae California (USA) 2004 Cutaneous Tissue culture
B1 P81 KC018040 KC017953 American crow Corvus brachyrhynchos Passeriformes Corvidae Maryland (USA) 2005 Cutaneous Skin lesion
B1 P82 KC018041 KC017931 Common murre Uria aalge Charadriiformes Alcidae California (USA) 1980 Cutaneous Skin lesion
B1 P83 KC018042 KC017948 Medium ground finch Geospiza fortis Passeriformes Emberizidae Galapagos Islands (Ecuador) 2008 Cutaneous Skin lesion
B1 P84 KC018043 KC017949 Woodpecker finch Camarhynchus pallidus Passeriformes Thraupidae Galapagos Islands (Ecuador) 2008 Cutaneous Skin lesion
B1 P85 KC018044 KC017956 American crow Corvus brachyrhynchos Passeriformes Corvidae Pennsylvania (USA) 1999 Cutaneous Tissue culture
B1 P86 KC018045 KC017897 Northern (hen) harrier Circus cyaneus Accipitriformes Accipitridae Spain 2000 Cutaneous Skin lesion
B1 P87 KC018046 KC017957 Common bullfinch Pyrrhula pyrrhula Passeriformes Fringillidae Belgium 2008 Cutaneous Skin lesion
B1 P88 KC018047 KC017862 Great tit Parus major Passeriformes Paridae Hungary 2007 Cutaneous Skin lesion
B1 P89 KC018048 KC017958 Mississippi sandhill crane Grus canadensis Gruiformes Gruidae Mississippi (USA) 1992 Cutaneous Tissue culture
B1 P90 KC018049 KC017916 Swainson's thrush Catharus ustulatus Passeriformes Turdidae Wisconsin (USA) 1994 Cutaneous CAM
B1 P91 KC018050 KC017959 Gray-crowned rosy finch Leucosticte tephrocotis Passeriformes Fringillidae Montana (USA) 1985 Cutaneous Skin lesion
B1 P92 KC018051 KC017917 Humboldt penguin Spheniscus humboldti Sphenisciformes Spheniscidae Wisconsin (USA) 2008 Cutaneous Tissue culture
B1 P93 KC018052 KC017878 Hawai'i amakihi Hemignathus virens Passeriformes Fringillidae Hawaii (USA) 1987 Cutaneous-oral mucosa Tissue culture
B1 P94 KC018053 KC017927 Dark-eyed junco Junco hyemalis hyemalis Passeriformes Emberizidae Illinois (USA) 1986 Cutaneous Tissue culture
B1 P95 KC018054 KC017918 Canada goose Branta canadensis Anseriformes Anatidae Wisconsin (USA) 1989 Cutaneous CAM
B1 P96 KC018055 KC017879 Elepaio Chasiempis sandwichensis Passeriformes Monarchidae Hawaii (USA) 1996 Cutaneous Tissue culture
B1 P97 KC018056 KC017880 Apapane Himatione sanguinea Passeriformes Fringillidae Hawaii (USA) 1996 Cutaneous Tissue culture
B1 P98 KC018057 KC017881 Apapane Himatione sanguinea Passeriformes Fringillidae Hawaii (USA) 1996 Cutaneous Tissue culture
B1 P99 KC018058 KC017863 Golden eagle Aquila chrysaetos Accipitriformes Accipitridae Spain 2000 Cutaneous CAM
B1 P100 KC018059 KC017882 Apapane Himatione sanguinea Passeriformes Fringillidae Hawaii (USA) 1996 Cutaneous Tissue culture
B1 P101 KC018060 KC017884 Canary Serinus canaria Passeriformes Fringillidae Chile 2008 Cutaneous CAM
B1 P102 KC018061 KC017921 Common grackle Quiscalus quiscula Passeriformes Icteridae Texas (USA) 1993 Cutaneous Tissue culture
B1 P103 KC018062 KC017922 Boat-tailed grackle Quiscalus major Passeriformes Icteridae Texas (USA) 1989 Cutaneous Skin lesion
B2 P104 KC018063 KC017954 European starling Sturnus vulgaris Passeriformes Sturnidae Maryland (USA) 1984 Cutaneous Tissue culture
B2 P105 KC018064 KC017919 European starling Sturnus vulgaris Passeriformes Sturnidae Wisconsin (USA) 1985 Cutaneous Skin lesion
B2 P106 KC018065 KC017955 European starling Sturnus vulgaris Passeriformes Sturnidae Maryland (USA) 1985 Cutaneous CAM
B2 P107 KC018066 KC017864 Great bustard Otis tarda Gruiformes Otidae Hungary 2005 Cutaneous Skin lesion
B2 P108 KC018067 KC017865 Common hill myna Gracula religiosa Passeriformes Sturnidae Hungary Unknown Cutaneous Skin lesion
B3 P109 KC018068 KC017923 American robin Turdus migratorius Passeriformes Turdidae Texas (USA) 2005 Cutaneous Tissue culture
C P110 KC018069 KC017925 Yellow-crowned amazon Amazona ochrocephala Psittaciformes Psittacidae New York (USA) 1980 Cutaneous Tissue culture
C P111 AM050383 KC017849 Parrot Undescribed Psittaciformes Psittacidae UK Unknown unknown Tissue culture
a

That is, subclades of fowlpox and canarypox clades and the Psittacinepox virus clade in Bayesian analysis of concatenated, 4b, and DNA polymerase gene sequences.

b

†, Samples collected from captive birds (aviaries, zoos, etc.).

Virus isolation on muscovy duck embryo fibroblasts (MSDEF) (28, 29) or the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) of embryonated chicken eggs (28, 29) was carried out in several cases (Table 1). A lesion (ca. 1g) was homogenized for 2 min using a tissue grinder in 10 ml of Hanks' balanced salt solution (Gibco-Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 5% glycerin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and 5% gelatin (Difco-BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ). The tissue suspension was centrifuged at 800 × g at 4°C for 30 min. About 0.2 ml of supernatant was inoculated onto the CAM of 13-day-old embryonated chicken eggs after filtration through a 0.45-μm-pore-size filter. The eggs were incubated for 5 days at 37°C before harvesting. The CAM was excised under microscope and observed for generalized thickening or lesions. MSDEF cell culture was prepared and handled by the method of Docherty and Slota (28, 29). About 0.5 ml of supernatant, after filtration through a 0.45-μm-pore-size filter, was inoculated into a 7-day-old confluent T-75 flask of MSDEF. The flask was incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 in a humidified air incubator and read on days 3 to 7 after inoculation to observe for cytopathic effect (CPE). The flask was freeze-thawed for blind passage 7 days after the original inoculation if no CPE was seen (28, 29).

DNA was extracted from frozen tissue samples, CAM homogenates, tissue cultures, and paraffin-embedded samples with a QIAamp DNA minikit (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer's recommendations.

Primers, PCR, and sequencing.

In order to amplify a fragment of the avian poxviruses DNA polymerase gene, a PCR system was designed based on the known Fowlpox virus DNA polymerase gene sequence (30) utilizing the primer pair: PoPr1, 5′-CGCCGCATCATCTACTTATC-3′; and PoPr2, 5′-CCACACAGCGCCATTCATTA-3′. Since this method was not able to detect all poxvirus strains, a pair of universal primers (PPolF [5′-GGCYAGTACKCTTATYAAAGG-3′] and PPolR [5′-CGTCTCTACGTGTTTCGCT-3′]) was designed from the consensus sequence of the aligned DNA polymerase gene sequences of Fowlpox and Canarypox virus. Alignments were generated with the web-based Multalin software (31), while PRIMER2 (Scientific and Educational Software, Cary, NC) and PrimerSelect from the Lasergene software package (DNASTAR, Inc., Madison, WI) were used for primer design. The PCR amplifying a sequence of the 4b core protein gene was used as described by Lee and Lee (32).

All PCRs were performed in a 25-μl total volume containing 10 to 100 ng of target DNA diluted in, 5 μl of 5× Green GoTaq Flexi Buffer (Promega, Inc., Madison, WI), 2 μl of MgCl2 (25 mM), 0.75 μl of deoxynucleoside triphosphates (10 mM; Qiagen), 2 μl of each primer (10 pmol/μl), and 0.2 μl of GoTaq DNA polymerase (5 U/μl; Promega). The PCR was performed in DNA Engine Thermal Cyclers PTC-0200 (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA).

For the PCR amplifying the DNA polymerase gene segment with the PoPr1/2 primers the reaction consisted of initial denaturation for 5 min at 95°C, followed by 35 amplification cycles consisting of denaturation for 30 s at 95°C, primer annealing at 53°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 1 min. The final extension step was performed for 5 min at 72°C. For the PPolF and PPolR primers, the annealing temperature was set to 50°C, with the rest of the protocol unaltered. In the PCR amplifying the 4b core protein sequence the amplification was extended to 45 cycles and consisted of 1 min of denaturation at 95°C, 1 min of annealing at 60°C, and 1 min of extension at 72°C.

After amplification, 5 μl of each reaction mixture was subjected to electrophoresis in 1% agarose gel, and the amplified gene products were visualized under UV light after ethidium bromide staining. PCR products were isolated from agarose gel (QIAquick gel extraction kit; Qiagen), and direct cycle sequencing was performed with the primers used for amplification on an ABI 373A or an ABI Prism 3100 automated DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).

Phylogenetic methods.

Nucleic acid databases were searched using BLASTN (33). Multiple alignments of the obtained DNA sequences were performed with CLUSTAL W in the DAMBE software package (34) using the translated amino acid sequence alignment as a template for the precise alignment of the DNA sequences. Alignments were edited and shaded with BioEdit software (35). The concatenated alignment containing the sections of both 4b core protein and DNA polymerase gene sequences was also produced in DAMBE.

Phylogenies were generated separately for the 4b gene and DNA polymerase gene sequences and for the concatenated sequences of these two genes. Trees were constructed using three methods: neighbor joining (NJ), maximum likelihood (ML), and a Bayesian approach. To determine the most likely model of evolution, jModelTest (36, 37) was performed. Based on Akaike's information criterion, the most likely model for the DNA polymerase gene and the concatenated sequences was a general time reversible model with a gamma distribution (GTR+G), while for the 4b gene, it was the transitional model TIM1+G. The gamma rates for the three gene sequences were as follows: concatenated = 0.2590, 4b = 0.3260, and polymerase = 0.2670. The model and parameter estimates for the closest matching model (see below) was entered using NJ in MEGA 5.0 (38, 39), ML analyses in PAUP* 4.0b (40), and Bayesian analysis in MrBayes 3.1 (41, 42). The LogDet model (43) with the estimated gamma rate was used for NJ analysis bootstrapped for 1,000 replicates. ML analyses utilized the PAUP block from jModelTest for each gene region in a heuristic search with tree bisection and reconnection (TBR) branch swapping, bootstrapped for 100 replicates. Bayesian analyses were run for 1 to 2.5 million generations, with sampling at every 100th generation, until model convergence was achieved. Four chains and a 25% burn-in that was then discarded for all analyses were used. A 50% majority rule consensus tree was built from the resulting trees. Initial phylogenies were generated with Molluscum contagiosum (NC001731) as the outgroup, according to the method of Jarmin et al. (25). Tree topologies within the avian poxviruses were unchanged when the following outgroups were used (Deerpox virus AY689437, Tanapox virus EF420157, and Yaba-like disease virus AJ293568) (44). Subsequent trees excluded these outgroup taxa, and the isolates clustered in the most basal group were used as an outgroup. The use of orthopoxviruses for outgroup(s) did not affect the tree topologies (data not shown).

The average evolutionary divergence between sequences was estimated with the MEGA 5.0 software (39) both between and within Avipoxvirus clades, subclades and Orthopoxvirus clades. Analyses were conducted using the Tamura-Nei model with standard error estimated through 1,000 bootstrap replicates. The rate variation among sites was modeled with a gamma distribution (shape parameter = 1) using all codon positions. Between group and within group analyses were performed on the partial (555 bp) alignment of avipoxvirus DNA polymerase sequences complemented with Orthopoxvirus type sequences available from GenBank (Old World clade: X94355, Coxpox virus; M35027, Vaccinia virus; L22579, Variola virus; AY009089, Camelpox virus; DQ437594, Taterapox virus; DQ792504, Horsepox virus; AY484669, Rabbitpox virus; HM172544, Monkeypox virus; and AF012825, Ectromelia virus; North American clade: FJ807738, Volepox virus; DQ066529, Skunkpox virus; DQ066531, Raccoonpox virus) (n = 121), while additional within group analyses were also conducted on concatenated (981 bp) avipoxvirus DNA polymerase and 4b core protein sequences (n = 109). Potential recombinant sequences were excluded from the analysis.

A recombination analysis was performed on the concatenated sequence alignment using the RDP 3 software (45) in order to detect potential recombination events resulting in incongruent topology of the two single gene trees. The analysis focused on identifying events involving large sequence segments, or indeed the whole of the partial 4b core and DNA polymerase sequences (426 and 555 bp, respectively). The default selection of detection methods (RDP, GeneConv, and MaxChi) and general settings were used to perform the analyses but sequences were treated as linear, the power of detection was set to 0.01, the number of permutations to 100 with the shuffle column option.

The relationship between the phylogeny of avian hosts and avipoxvirus isolates were analyzed based on the most basic fowlpox virus (clade A) and canarypox virus (clade B) groupings. First, an alignment of cytochrome b sequences was generated for all available avipoxvirus hosts from GenBank; this gene contained the largest number of comparable and phylogenetically informative sequences across these species. When a sequence was not available for the specific host, the taxonomically closest available species was chosen. The taxa in the analyses were pared down to a single representative for each host species to avoid bias due to highly sampled taxa with the same poxvirus genotype. The final data set contained 61 sequences; 29 from canarypox virus hosts and 32 from fowlpox virus hosts (Table 2). Sequences were trimmed to 589 bp shared among all of the taxa in Sequencher 4.10 (Gene Codes, Ann Arbor, MI). A maximum-likelihood phylogeny of the hosts was generated to visualize the distribution of different poxvirus groupings. Evolutionary divergence was estimated between and within the canarypox virus and fowlpox virus group. In order to estimate the evolutionary divergence between sequences, pairwise genetic distances, a measure of the genetic similarity between two groups based on shared nucleotides, were calculated with the MEGA 5.0 software (39). Both analyses estimated differences over sequence pairs using a maximum composite likelihood model with standard error estimated through 100 bootstrap replicates.

Table 2.

List of cytochrome b sequences for avipoxvirus hosts from GenBank

Pox type Host (English name) Host (Latin name) Alternate host sequence GenBank no.
Canarypox Yellow-crowned amazon Amazona ochrocephala AY194411.1
Golden eagle Aquila chrysaetos EU345512.1
Canada goose Branta canadensis NC_007011.1
Woodpecker finch Cactospiza pallida AF108793.1
Black-hooded siskin Carduelis atrata L76385.1
House finch Carpodacus mexicanus AF447364.1
Swainson's thrush Catharus ustulatus EU619788.1
Elepaio Chasiempis sandwichensis Eiao monarch Pomarea iphis fluxa AY262704.1
Northern (hen) harrier Circus cyaneus Western marsh-harrier Circus aeruginosus AY987305.1
Northern (masked) bobwhite Colinus virginianus EU372675.1
American crow Corvus brachyrhynchos AY509619.1
Common raven Corvus corax AY527266.1
Medium Ground finch Geospiza fortis AF108773.1
Common hill myna Gracula religiosa Common myna Sturnus tristis NC_015195.1
Mississippi sandhill crane Grus canadensis FJ769855.1
Hawai'i amakihi Hemignathus virens AF015755.1
Apapane Himatione sanguinea AF015754.1
Dark-eyed junco Junco hyemalis hyemalis AF290161.1
Gray-crowned rosy finch Leucosticte tephrocotis AY156380.1
Galapagos mockingbird Mimus parvulus Le Conte's thrasher Toxostoma lecontei AY329478.1
Great tit Parus major EU167009.1
Black-billed magpie Pica hudsonia AY030114.1
Common bullfinch Pyrrhula pyrrhula HQ284613.1
Boat-tailed grackle Quiscalus major AF089055.2
Common grackle Quiscalus quiscula AF089058.2
Canary Serinus canaria AY914127.1
Humboldt penguin Spheniscus humboldti DQ137220.1
European starling Sturnus vulgaris AF285790.1
American robin Turdus migratorius EU619827.1
Fowlpox Northern goshawk Accipiter gentilis NC_011818.1
Wood duck Aix sponsa EU585605.1
Red-legged partridge Alectoris rufa AM850840.1
Blue-winged teal Anas discors EU914146.1
Mottled duck Anas fulvigula Mallard duck Anas platyrhynchos, alt. haplotype EU755252.1
Mallard duck Anas platyrhynchos EU755253.1
Eastern imperial eagle Aquila heliaca Z73465.1
Redhead duck Aythya americana NC_000877.1
Canada goose Branta canadensis NC_007011.1
Eurasian eagle owl Bubo bubo AJ003961.1
Common buzzard Buteo buteo NC_003128.3
Red tailed hawk Buteo jamaicensis GQ264785.1
Rock dove Columba livia NC_013978.1
Blue-eared pheasant Crossoptilon auritum AF534552.1
Trumpeter swan Cygnus buccinator Tundra swan Cygnus columbianus DQ083161.1
Peregrine falcon Falco peregrinus EU233100.1
Red-footed falcon Falco vespertinus EU233132.1
Domestic fowl Gallus domesticus Red junglefowl Gallus gallus NC_007236.1
Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus GQ264818.1
Booted eagle Hieraaetus pennatus Y15760.1
Southern giant petrel Macronectes giganteus AF076060.1
Domestic turkey Meleagris gallopavo NC_010195.2
Red kite Milvus milvus AY987312.1
Great bustard Otis tarda NC_014046.1
Indian peafowl Pavo cristatus DQ010648.1
Pelagic cormorant Phalacrocorax pelagicus EU167011.1
Laysan albatross Phoebastria immutabilis AB276050.1
Superb parrot Polytelis swainsonii Red-winged parrot Aprosmictus erythropterus AB177959.1
Magellanic penguin Spheniscus magellanicus DQ137218.1
Oriental turtle-dove Streptopelia orientalis Spotted dove Streptopelia chinensis AF483341.1
Common murre Uria aalge DQ485892.1
Mourning dove Zenaida macroura Eared dove Zenaida auriculata NC_015203.1

RESULTS

Molecular phylogeny of the avipoxvirus sequences.

The primers PPolF and PPolR for DNA polymerase gene were successfully used to amplify sequences from all tested isolates which encompassed all previously known clades. These primers yielded products of ∼900 bp. However, only a 555-bp length part was included in the phylogenetic analysis since older samples were examined only with the PoPr1/2 primers, which produced a smaller PCR product. A 426-bp long sequence of the 4b core protein gene was used to prepare an additional alignment. Thus, the concatenated sequences of both genes were 981 bp long.

Partial sequences of both DNA polymerase and 4b core protein genes were amplified successfully from 111 avian pox lesion samples and virus isolates. The topologies of the phylogenetic trees created with different methods (neighbor joining [NJ], maximum likelihood [ML], and Bayesian) from the concatenated (Fig. 1), 4b core protein gene (Fig. 2), and DNA polymerase gene (Fig. 3) sequence alignments were very similar. Based on the posterior probability values and most consistent tree topology, the Bayesian trees were considered the most reliable, followed by the NJ analysis, while the ML trees had the lowest bootstrap values and poorest resolution. Based on these results we primarily used the topology of the concatenated Bayesian tree through our analysis. Avipoxviruses form two major clades (A and B) with strong support (Fig. 1), while the placement of the third major clade (C) is less certain.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Bayesian phylogeny of concatenated DNA sequences from genes encoding 4b core and DNA polymerase proteins of avipoxviruses. Posterior probability values of the Bayesian trees (1,000 replicates) and neighbor-joining and maximum likelihood bootstrap values (1,000 replicates) of >70 are indicated (MB/NJ/ML). Symbols: <, lower than 70; ¤, branch does not exist with that method. Avipoxvirus clades A to C, subclades, and clusters are labeled according to the nomenclature of Jarmin et al. (25) and Jarvi et al. (46). Novel subgroups described in the present study are highlighted by gray. Isolate origins are given either as U.S. state abbreviations or using the following location codes: Antarctica (ANT), Argentina (ARG), Belgium (BEL), Chile (CHI), Ecuador (ECU), Germany (GER), Hungary (HU), Italy (ITA), Netherlands (NL), Norway (NOR), Portugal (POR), Spain (ES), South Korea (ROK), United Arab Emirates (UAE), and United Kingdom (UK). Avian poxviruses which were isolated from captive birds (aviaries, zoos, etc.) are highlighted by gray, isolates containing potential recombinations are set in a box. The scale represents the number of substitutions per site.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Bayesian phylogram of DNA sequences from genes encoding 4b core proteins of avipoxviruses. Posterior probability values of >70 are shown. Avipoxvirus clades A to C, subclades, and clusters are labeled according to the nomenclature of Jarmin et al. (25) and Jarvi et al. (46). Novel subgroups described in the present study are highlighted by gray. Isolate origins are given either as U.S. state abbreviations or using the following location codes: Antarctica (ANT), Argentina (ARG), Belgium (BEL), Chile (CHI), Ecuador (ECU), Germany (GER), Hungary (HU), Italy (ITA), Netherlands (NL), Norway (NOR), Portugal (POR), Spain (ES), South Korea (ROK), United Arab Emirates (UAE), and United Kingdom (UK). Avian poxviruses that were isolated from captive birds (aviaries, zoos, etc.) are highlighted by gray. The scale represents the number of substitutions per site. Due to the large number of avian poxvirus isolates in the 4b gene analyses (n = 226), we abbreviated the names for isolates with identical sequences from GenBank accessions as follows: (i) P1 genotype, AB292647, AF198100, AJ005164, AJ581527, AM050377, AM050378, AM050379, AM050380, AY453171, AY453172, AY530302, AY530304, AY530307, DQ873808, EF568377, EF634347, EF634348, M25781, GU108500, GU108501, GU108502, GU108503, GU108504, GU108505, GU108506, GU108507, GQ221269, GQ180212, GQ180207, GQ180201, GU108509, and GU108508; (ii) P6 genotype, AM050385, AM050387, AM050388, AY530303, AY530305, DQ873809, DQ873810, DQ873811, EF016108, GQ180210, GQ180208, and GQ180204; (iii) P55 genotype, EF568379, EF568384, EF568386, EF568387, EF568388, EF568389, EF568391, EF568399, and EF568400; (iv) P77 genotype, AM050381, AM050389, AY530308, GQ487567, GU108510, GQ180202, GQ180203, GQ180205, and GQ180209; (v) P92 genotype, AY530310, AY318871, AY453174, AY453175, EF568380, EF568392, EF568394, EF568395, EF634349, EF634350, and GQ180213; and (vi) P109 genotype, DQ131895, DQ131897, DQ131900, and DQ131901.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Bayesian phylogeny of DNA sequences from gene encoding DNA polymerase protein of avipoxviruses. Posterior probability values of >70 are shown. Avipoxvirus clades A to C, subclades, and clusters are labeled according to the nomenclature of Jarmin et al. (25) and Jarvi et al. (46). Novel subgroups described in the present study are highlighted by gray. Isolate origins are given either as U.S. state abbreviations or using the following location codes: Antarctica (ANT), Argentina (ARG), Belgium (BEL), Chile (CHI), Ecuador (ECU), Germany (GER), Hungary (HU), Italy (ITA), Netherlands (NL), Norway (NOR), Portugal (POR), Spain (ES), South Korea (ROK), United Arab Emirates (UAE), and United Kingdom (UK). Avian poxviruses which were isolated from captive birds (aviaries, zoos, etc.) are highlighted by gray. The scale represents the number of substitutions per site.

Clade A represents seven subclades (A1 to A7). Subclade A1 comprises viruses isolated from birds of the order Galliformes (domestic fowl, blue-eared pheasant) with a wide geographic distribution. A poxvirus isolated from a superb parrot originating from Chile also clustered in subclade A1. Subclade A2 consists of viruses originating from birds of the order Columbiformes (rock doves, oriental turtle doves) from North America, Europe, and the Republic of Korea, with additional samples from a peacock, raptors, red-legged partridges, and great bustards from Europe. Subclade A3 formerly consisted of only an albatross virus and a falcon virus, but it has been expanded by isolates from other seabirds (southern giant petrel, pelagic cormorant, common murre, Laysan albatross, Magellanic penguin) from the coasts of the Pacific and Atlantic Ocean and Eurasian eagle-owls from Korea. Subclade A4 still forms an outlier and contains viruses from peregrine falcon and red-footed falcon from Hungary and a United Arab Emirates falcon isolate. A new subclade, A5, sharing a common ancestor with subclade A1, comprises isolates from Anseriformes (trumpeter swans, mottled duck, blue-winged teal, redhead duck, wood duck, mallard duck) originating from the United States. New subclades A6 and A7 share a ancestor with subclades A2 and A3. Subclade A6 comprises viruses from Columbiformes (mourning doves, rock doves) and a Canada goose from North America. Isolates from Accipitriformes (bald eagles, red tailed hawk, common buzzard, northern goshawk, red kite) from the United States and Europe and a mallard duck group under subclade A7.

Clade B is comprised of three subclades (B1 to B3). Previously reported subclade B1 comprises viruses isolated from a wide range of passerine species (Passeriformes) of worldwide distribution, although several nonpasserine hosts (e.g., northern harrier, Mississippi sandhill crane, Humboldt penguin, etc.) are represented as well. This subclade further diversifies into three outliers and a main branch consisting of two clusters. Nine house finch isolates from our study and further two from a previous work (46) with a diverse range of isolation dates and geographic origins were analyzed and found to group within cluster 2 of subclade B1. The three outliers were formed by two strains from grackles, a virus from a Chilean canary and a strain described from Berthelot's pipit (Fig. 2). Previously reported subclade B2 consisted of isolates from starlings and mynahs. It was found that starlings in Europe and North America host the same virus strain. Viruses isolated from a great bustard in Hungary and a rock and wood pigeon from Europe also clustered into subclade B2. Isolates from a wide range of different bird species presented to a wildlife center in Virginia in 2003 and 2004 form a new subclade, B3 (Fig. 2). From our samples, only a 2003 American robin isolate from Texas clustered into this subclade. Clade C consists exclusively of isolates from psittacine species. The location of this clade is ambiguous. It formed either a separate clade, or it was a weakly supported member of clade B.

The within-group mean genetic distances of the concatenated avian poxvirus sequences were 0.087 ± 0.007 standard error (SE) in clade A and 0.059 ± 0.005 SE in clade B, while the sequences were identical (genetic distance = 0.000) in clade C. Mean genetic distances of the concatenated sequences within avipoxvirus subclades ranged from 0.000 to 0.035 (Table 3). The results of the partial DNA polymerase sequence analysis allowing a comparison with orthopoxviruses (Old World and North American clade) are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3.

Estimates of average evolutionary divergence of sequence pairs between and within avipoxvirus subclades and orthopox virus cladesa

Clade Avg evolutionary divergence (SE)
Distance (SE)
Avipox
Orthopox
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 B1 B2 B3 C OW NA 1 2
Avipox A1 (0.016) (0.016) (0.024) (0.021) (0.019) (0.016) (0.043) (0.046) (0.048) (0.050) (0.097) (0.102) 0.001 (0.000) 0.000 (0.000)
Avipox A2 0.107 (0.004) (0.024) (0.021) (0.016) (0.013) (0.042) (0.049) (0.049) (0.047) (0.104) (0.111) 0.016 (0.004) 0.014 (0.003)
Avipox A3 0.098 0.020 (0.024) (0.020) (0.014) (0.013) (0.042) (0.050) (0.048) (0.046) (0.105) (0.110) 0.005 (0.002) 0.006 (0.001)
Avipox A4 0.169 0.165 0.158 (0.027) (0.022) (0.024) (0.044) (0.043) (0.051) (0.054) (0.099) (0.104) 0.000 (0.000) 0.000 (0.000)
Avipox A5 0.151 0.142 0.132 0.190 (0.022) (0.024) (0.051) (0.054) (0.050) (0.060) (0.087) (0.094) 0.000 (0.000) 0.000 (0.003)
Avipox A6 0.120 0.099 0.078 0.149 0.140 (0.016) (0.039) (0.049) (0.044) (0.052) (0.088) (0.089) 0.005 (0.002) 0.003 (0.001)
Avipox A7 0.104 0.086 0.079 0.161 0.171 0.103 (0.038) (0.052) (0.051) (0.043) (0.105) (0.110) 0.010 (0.003) 0.007 (0.003)
Avipox B1 0.354 0.356 0.359 0.345 0.386 0.312 0.327 (0.026) (0.034) (0.048) (0.120) (0.124) 0.017 (0.003) 0.024 (0.003)
Avipox B2 0.391 0.392 0.402 0.335 0.419 0.390 0.436 0.206 (0.033) (0.054) (0.115) (0.131) 0.050 (0.008) 0.036 (0.006)
Avipox B3 0.385 0.401 0.400 0.378 0.391 0.369 0.426 0.262 0.226 (0.059) (0.114) (0.116) n/c n/c
Avipox C 0.421 0.406 0.401 0.435 0.477 0.423 0.366 0.409 0.45 0.481 (0.107) (0.119) 0.000 (0.000) 0.000 (0.000)
Orthopox OW 0.778 0.827 0.83 0.775 0.751 0.745 0.819 0.942 0.917 0.907 0.871 (0.019) 0.013 (0.003) 0.016 (0.003)
Orthopox NA 0.804 0.864 0.854 0.823 0.789 0.758 0.849 0.975 0.973 0.882 0.933 0.148 0.076 (0.011)
a

Estimates of average evolutionary divergence of sequence pairs between and within avipoxvirus subclades (A1 to A7, B1 to B3, and C) and orthopoxvirus clades (Old World [OW] and North American [NA]). The number of base substitutions per site from averaging over all sequence pairs between (matrix) and within (columns) groups is shown. Standard error estimates are shown in parentheses. The results of within-group analyses are presented in the last two columns: the within-group analysis for column 1 was performed on a partial DNA polymerase sequence (555 bp) alignment (n = 121), while the within-group analysis for column 2 was conducted on concatenated (981-bp) DNA polymerase and 4b core protein sequences (n = 109). Potential recombinants were excluded from the analysis. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA5 (39). n/c, not calculated.

Possible recombination between 4b and DNA polymerase loci.

Apparent recombination breakpoints were located and confirmed with multiple analysis methods available in the RDP 3 software in five of the concatenated sequences at the junction of the 4b core protein and DNA polymerase (nucleotide [nt] 426). Isolates P52, P53, and P54 (from two bald eagles and a mallard) were identified by the RDP method (P = 8.719 × 10−07) as apparent interlocus recombinants of isolate P41 (mourning dove) as minor parent (4b core protein sequence) and P51 (red kite) as major parent (DNA polymerase sequence). It should be noted that in the concatenated sequence tree (Fig. 1), the apparent recombinants (P52, P53, and P54) are basal to the apparent parents P51 and P41. It is therefore possible that the apparent recombinant carries the ancestral sequences, whereas the apparent parents carry recombined loci. However, the topology of the three trees (shown in Fig. 1, 2, and 3) is ambiguous for these isolates, so it would be premature to speculate on the actual nature of the event.

Isolate P37 (from a wood duck) was also identified (P = 1.613 × 10−13) as an apparent interlocus recombinant, with P32 (mottled duck) as minor parent (4b core protein sequence) and P2 (domestic turkey) as major parent (DNA polymerase sequence).

A fifth apparent recombination event, in this case intralocus, affecting only a part of the DNA polymerase gene, was detected in a common hill mynah isolate P108 (P = 9.469 × 10−13) with one breakpoint identified at the sequence junction (nt 426) and an additional ending breakpoint at nt 763 of the alignment. The minor parent was identified as the dark-eyed junco isolate P94 (DNA polymerase gene sequence), while the major parent was a European starling isolate P104. All of the above apparent recombination events were confirmed with similarly significant P values by the GeneConv, BootScan, MaxChi, Chimaera, SiScan, and 3Seq methods.

Concordance of host and virus phylogeny.

When assessing genetic diversity between the avian hosts, the mean between-group genetic distance for the hosts of canarypox viruses (clade B) and fowlpox viruses (clade A) was 0.209 ± 0.011 SE. The mean within-group genetic distances were 0.175 ± 0.009 SE for hosts of clade B viruses and 0.186 ± 0.107 SE for hosts of clade A viruses. Within-group distances were not significantly different based on the overlap of the 95% confidence intervals with the means. Overall, there was significantly greater between- than within-group genetic diversity, indicating two distinct groups of hosts. Nonetheless, although the phylogenetic distribution of hosts shows overall grouping congruent with the clade of virus, it has been possible to isolate clade A and B viruses from some closely related hosts (Fig. 4).

Fig 4.

Fig 4

Maximum-likelihood phylogeny of the hosts generated from the cytochrome b sequences from GenBank. Hosts of fowlpox viruses are highlighted by gray, and canarypox viruses are without highlight. Bootstrap values of >70 are shown. The scale represents the number of substitutions per site.

DISCUSSION

The phylogenetics and epidemiology of avian poxviruses is only partially understood. This study contributed to our understanding of this group of viruses by studying a broad range of isolates collected from around the world. Until now, the highly conserved 4b core protein gene was used as the sole pan-genus marker both in diagnostics and phylogeography (21, 2427, 47). We show that the DNA polymerase gene is useful as another pan-genus marker, and the results of phylogenetic analyses are comparable to those based on the 4b core protein gene while the use of this additional gene provided the first opportunity to study the potential role of recombination in the evolution of avipoxviruses.

The updated classification of avian poxviruses, based on our concatenated Bayesian phylogeny and described below, primarily follows the nomenclature of Jarmin et al. (25). Three main clades (A to C) are differentiated within avipoxviruses (Fig. 1). Clade A appears to be the fowlpox clade, clade B the canarypox clade, and clade C the Psittacinepox virus clade. Clade A further differentiates into seven subclades. Subclades A1 to A4 were previously described (25). Subclade A1 is formed by Fowlpox virus in the narrowest sense. Subclade A2 was identified as Turkeypox virus, but it now appears to be more representative of a subset of pigeonpox viruses, as a large number of geographically diverse viruses isolated from the order Columbiformes are grouped here. When initially described by Jarmin et al. (25), subclades A3 and A4 contained only two and one sequences, respectively. Our study contributed a large number of novel sequences to these groups. It is now apparent that subclade A3 represents poxviruses of marine birds and subclade A4 those of falcons. Novel subclades A5 to A7 were identified in the present study. Subclade A5 appears to represent poxviruses of waterfowl, subclade A6 as a second, distinct group of pigeonpox viruses, and subclade A7 as poxviruses of raptors. Clade B was found to have three subclades as described earlier (25). Subclade B1 comprises the strict canarypox viruses. Mynahpox and Starlingpox viruses grouped together in subclade B2 and thus the use of the term “Sturnidaepox virus” is proposed. Considering that the isolates of subclade B3 originate from a narrow temporal and geographic range, we suggest it should be known as “Virginian epidemic avipoxvirus.” The finding of Jarvi et al. (46) establishing that subclade B1 has two main clusters was confirmed by our study. The outlier containing the Berthelot's pipit isolate from Macronesia was described earlier (4), but two further outliers, including one from grackles, were identified here.

The mean genetic distance within clades A and B of avian poxviruses appears to be similar to that of the North American clade of orthopoxviruses, but it is about four to five times the mean distance between Old World orthopoxviruses. However, since the average divergence values within Avipoxvirus subclades are generally quite similar to those calculated for orthopoxvirus clades, we may equally consider the option that the current subclades could eventually be viewed as equivalent taxonomical units. This relatively large genetic divergence among avian poxviruses, as well as the topology of the phylogenetic trees, indicates that the Avipoxvirus genus is one of the more widely diverged genera of the Chordopoxvirinae subfamily.

There is some evidence in our data for recombination events in the evolutionary history of the studied avipoxviruses. Although the limited number of loci (n = 2) examined, their length, and their genomic separation (103 kbp in fowlpox virus AF198100) constrains the possible conclusions, it seems likely that the detected events occurred in relatively well defined ecological and phylogenetic frameworks. These events primarily involved viruses (within subclades A5, A6, or A7) circulating in closely interacting hosts, providing a natural interface for potential virus exchange and coinfection (e.g., between and within Accipitriformes, Columbiformes, and Anseriformes), while the case involving Sturnidae (subclade B2) additionally highlights the potential of virus diversification and adaptation linked to extensive, primarily anthropogenic changes in the geographic distribution and concomitant “unnatural” contacts between species (in zoo collections or between alien, invasive, and native resident species in the wild). The confirmation of the nature of these events and elucidation of their role in the evolution and function (e.g., pathogenicity, adaptation, etc.) of avian poxviruses would, however, require the study of complete genomic sequences.

The range of hosts infected by fowlpox viruses (clade A), as estimated by within-group genetic diversity, was not significantly greater than that for those infected by canarypox viruses (clade B), indicating that each clade infects a similarly diverse range of bird hosts. One caveat is that the effect of sampling bias on the phylogenetic results is unknown. Sampling for avipoxviruses is not systematic across hosts and some taxa, e.g., poultry and songbirds are more intensively sampled than other groups. Several isolates originated from quarantine facilities, aviaries, or zoos where unusual transmissions may occur (particularly between already stressed or diseased birds), resulting in lesions but probably representing “dead-end” events that would rarely occur in the wild and would not lead to sustained epornitics. Such phenomena could have occurred, for example, in the cases of the fowlpox virus-infected superb parrot in subclade A1, the canarypox virus-infected Humboldt penguin in cluster 1 of subclade B1, or the isolates of subclade B3, which were isolated from a wide range of different bird species within a short time range during hospitalization in a wildlife center in Virginia.

In general, avian poxviruses tend to be host family or order specific, but ecological niche, habitat, and geography may modulate this pattern. A clear example of host family/order specificity is the European starling, which harbors the same virus strain both in Europe and North America and is a close relative of mynahs, infected with a closely related virus. The viruses isolated from and largely specific to falcons and raptors are other good examples.

The circulation of certain poxviruses within a prey-predator system can be recognized in several subclades (e.g., subclades A2 and B1). For example, we hypothesize that eastern imperial eagles may acquire pox infection from their dove prey (subclade A2) and northern harriers from a passerine species (subclade B1).

Another example of the role of the ecological niche and/or habitat lies with the poxviruses of marine birds (subclade A3), where evolutionarily distinct avian species with similar lifestyles harbor related viruses. In this case, although the isolates showed wide spatial separation, the effect of geography could not be excluded completely since these hosts migrate widely and share breeding sites where poxvirus infections could be transmitted and sustained. Except for this situation, geography seems to have only a minor effect on the avipoxvirus phylogeny, but it should not be dismissed, as in the case of the “Virginian epidemic avipoxvirus,” where the hospitalized birds infected each other.

An interesting phenomenon can be observed in cluster 2 of subclade B1. Viruses of this cluster infect different passerines, including all of the analyzed house finch isolates, with diverse retrieval dates and geographic origins. The timeline of sample collection indicates that the ancestor of cluster 2 might have been a house finch virus (see samples P64 to P71 and P73 in Fig. 1 to 3), the variants of which were subsequently dispersed around the Western Hemisphere and infected other bird species.

The data presented here provide novel insights into the complex relationship between avian poxviruses and their hosts. Generation of a significant number of whole-genome sequences of viruses from key points in the tree presented here would help to solve emerging problems in the conservation of endemic bird species and decrease pox-related economic losses in the poultry industry.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

M.G. and this project were supported in part by the Lendület program (grant number LP2012-22) of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. K.E. was supported by the Bolyai János Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. Work at the USGS National Wildlife Health Center was funded by the U.S. Department of the Interior. Work in Spain was funded in part by the Junta de Comunidades of Castilla–La Mancha.

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Use of trade or product names does not imply endorsement by the U.S. government.

We thank Carter Atkinson, Benjamin Lucio-Martinez, and Virginia Rago for providing samples for this study.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 13 February 2013

REFERENCES

  • 1. Bolte AL, Meurer J, Kaleta EF. 1999. Avian host spectrum of avipoxviruses. Avian Pathol. 28:415–432 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Parker PG, Buckles EL, Farrington H, Petren K, Whiteman NK, Ricklefs RE, Bollmer JL, Jiménez-Uzcátequi G. 2011. 110 years of avipoxvirus in the Galapagos Islands. PLoS One 6:e15989 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015989 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Skinner MA, Laidlaw SM, Eldaghayes I, Kaiser P, Cottingham MG. 2005. Fowlpox virus as a recombinant vaccine vector for use in mammals and poultry. Expert Rev. Vaccines 4:63–76 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Illera JC, Emerson BC, Richardson DS. 2008. Genetic characterization, distribution and prevalence of avian pox and avian malaria in the Berthelot's pipit (Anthus berthelotii) in Macaronesia. Parasitol. Res. 103:1435–1443 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Zimmermann D, Anderson MD, Lane E, van Wilpe E, Caiulei O, Douglass N, Williamson AL, Kotze A. 2011. Avian poxvirus epizootic in a breeding population of lesser flamingos (Phoenicopterus minor) at Kamfers Dam, Kimberley, South Africa. J. Wildl. Dis. 47:989–993 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Chen CC, Pei KJ, Lee FR, Tzeng MP, Chang TC. 2011. Avian pox infection in a free-living crested serpent eagle (Spilornis cheela) in southern Taiwan. Avian Dis. 55:143–146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Tripathy DN, Reed WM. 2008. Pox, p 291–309 In Saif Y-M, Fadly AM, Glisson JR, McDougald LR, Nolan LK, Swayne DE. (ed), Diseases of poultry, 12th ed Wiley-Blackwell, Ames, IA [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Laiolo P, Serrano D, Tella JL, Carrete M, López G, Navarro C. 2007. Distress calls reflects poxvirus infection in lesser short-toed lark Calandrella rufescens. Behav. Ecol. 18:507–512 [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Kleindorfer S, Dudaniec RY. 2006. Increasing prevalence of avian poxvirus in Darwin's finches and its effect on male pairing success. J. Avian Biol. 37:69–76 [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Kane OJ, Uhart MM, Rago V, Pereda AJ, Smith JR, Van Buren A, Clark JA, Boersma PD. 2012. Avian pox in Magellanic penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus). J. Wildl. Dis. 48:790–794 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. van Riper C, van Riper SG, III, Hansen WR. 2002. Epizootiology and effect of avian pox on Hawaiian forest birds. Auk. 119:929–942 [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Tripathy DN, Schnitzlein WM, Morris PJ, Janssen DL, Zuba JK, Massey G, Atkinson CT. 2000. Characterization of poxviruses from forest birds in Hawaii. J. Wildl. Dis. 36:225–230 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Thiel T, Whiteman NK, Tirape A, Baquero MI, Cedeno V, Walsh T, Uzcátequi GJ, Parker PG. 2005. Characterization of canarypox-like viruses infecting endemic birds in the Galapagos Islands. J. Wildl. Dis. 41:342–353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Smits JE, Tella JL, Carrete M, Serrano D, Lopez G. 2005. An epizootic of avian pox in endemic short-toed larks (Calandrella rufescens) and Berthelot's pipits (Anthus berthelotti) in the Canary Islands, Spain. Vet. Pathol. 42:59–65 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Bailey TA, Silvanose C, Manvell R, Gough RE, Kinne J, Combreau O, Launay F. 2002. Medical dilemmas associated with rehabilitating confiscated houbara bustards (Chlamydotis undulata macqueenii) after avian pox and paramyxovirus type 1 infection. J. Wildl. Dis. 38:518–532 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Deem SL, Cruz MB, Higashiguchi JM, Parker PG. 2012. Diseases of poultry and endemic birds in Galapagos: implications for the reintroduction of native species. Anim. Conserv. 15:73–82 [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Krone O, Essbauer S, Wibbelt G, Isa G, Rudolph M, Gough RE. 2004. Avipoxvirus infection in peregrine falcons (Falco peregrinus) from a reintroduction programme in Germany. Vet. Rec. 154:110–113 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Lawson B, Lachish S, Colvile KM, Durrant C, Peck KM, Toms MP, Sheldon BC, Cunningham AA. 2012. Emergence of a novel avian pox disease in British tit species. PLoS One 7:e40176 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Lachish S, Lawson B, Cunningham AA, Sheldon BC. 2012. Epidemiology of the emergent disease Paridae pox in an intensively studied wild bird population. PLoS One 7:e38316 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Lachish S, Bonsall MB, Lawson B, Cunningham AA, Sheldon BC. 2012. Individual and population-level impacts of an emerging poxvirus disease in a wild population of great tits. PLoS One 7:e48545 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048545 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Manarolla G, Pisoni G, Sironi G, Rampin T. 2010. Molecular biological characterization of avian poxvirus strains isolated from different avian species. Vet. Microbiol. 140:1–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Afonso CL, Tulman ER, Lu Z, Zsak L, Kutish GF, Rock DL. 2000. The genome of fowlpox virus. J. Virol. 74:3815–3831 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Tulman ER, Afonso CL, Lu Z, Zsak L, Kutish GF, Rock DL. 2004. The genome of canarypox virus. J. Virol. 78:353–366 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Adams CJ, Feldman SH, Sleeman JM. 2005. Phylogenetic analysis of avian poxviruses among free-ranging birds of Virginia. Avian Dis. 49:601–605 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Jarmin S, Manvell R, Gough RE, Laidlaw SM, Skinner MA. 2006. Avipoxvirus phylogenetics: identification of a PCR length polymorphism that discriminates between the two major clades. J. Gen. Virol. 87:2191–2201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Luschow D, Hoffmann T, Hafez HM. 2004. Differentiation of avian poxvirus strains on the basis of nucleotide sequences of 4b gene fragment. Avian Dis. 48:453–462 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Weli SC, Traavik T, Tryland M, Coucheron DH, Nilssen O. 2004. Analysis and comparison of the 4b core protein gene of avipoxviruses from wild birds: evidence for interspecies spatial phylogenetic variation. Arch. Virol. 149:2035–2046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Docherty DE, Slota PG. 1988. Use of muscovy duck embryo fibroblasts for the isolation of viruses from wild birds. J. Tissue Cult. Methods 11:165–170 [Google Scholar]
  • 29. OIE 2008. Fowlpox. In OIE manual of diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animals, 6th ed OIE, Paris, France: http://www.oie.int/fileadmin/Home/eng/Health_standards/tahm/2.03.10_FOWLPOX.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Binns MM, Boursnell ME, Tomley FM, Campbell J. 1989. Analysis of the fowlpoxvirus gene encoding the 4b core polypeptide and demonstration that it possesses efficient promoter sequences. Virology 170:288–291 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Corpet F. 1988. Multiple sequence alignment with hierarchical clustering. Nucleic Acids Res. 16:10881–10890 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Lee LH, Lee KH. 1997. Application of the polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of fowl poxvirus infection. J. Virol. Methods 63:113–119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403–410 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Xia X. 2001. Data analysis in molecular biology and evolution. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Hall TA. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 41:95–98 [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Guindon S, Gascuel O. 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 52:696–704 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Posada D. 2008. jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25:1253–1256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Saitou N, Nei M. 1987. The neighbor joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:406–425 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. 2011. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum-parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28:2731–2739 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods), version 4.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754–755 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Lockhart PJ, Steel MA, Hendy MD, Penny D. 1994. Recovering evolutionary trees under a more realistic model of sequence evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:605–612 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Emerson GL, Li Y, Frace MA, Olsen-Rasmussen MA, Khristova ML, Govil D, Sammons SA, Regnery RL, Karem KL, Damon IK, Carroll DS. 2009. The phylogenetics and ecology of the orthopoxviruses endemic to North America. PLoS One 4:e7666 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007666 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Heath L, van der Walt E, Varsani A, Martin DP. 2006. Recombination patterns in aphthoviruses mirror those found in other picornaviruses. J. Virol. 80:11827–11832 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Jarvi SI, Triglia D, Giannoulis A, Farias M, Bianchi K, Atkinson CT. 2008. Diversity, origins, and virulence of avipoxviruses in Hawaiian forest birds. Cons. Genet. 9:339–348 [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Farias ME, LaPointe DA, Atkinson CT, Czerwonka C, Shrestha R, Jarvi SI. 2010. Taqman real-time PCR detects avipoxvirus DNA in blood of Hawai'i'amakihi (Hemignathus virens). PLoS One 5:e10745 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010745 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Virology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES