Skip to main content
Journal of Virology logoLink to Journal of Virology
. 2013 May;87(9):4923–4928. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02796-12

Congruent Evolution of Fitness and Genetic Robustness in Vesicular Stomatitis Virus

Isabel S Novella a,, John B Presloid a, Cameron Beech a, Claus O Wilke b
PMCID: PMC3624304  PMID: 23408631

Abstract

Quasispecies theory is a case of mutation-selection balance for evolution at high mutation rates, such as those observed in RNA viruses. One of the main predictions of this model is the selection for robustness, defined as the ability of an organism to remain phenotypically unchanged in the face of mutation. We have used a collection of vesicular stomatitis virus strains that had been evolving either under positive selection or under random drift. We had previously shown that the former increase in fitness while the latter have overall fitness decreases (I. S. Novella, J. B. Presloid, T. Zhou, S. D. Smith-Tsurkan, B. E. Ebendick-Corpus, R. N. Dutta, K. L. Lust, and C. O. Wilke, J. Virol. 84:4960–4968, 2010). Here, we determined the robustness of these strains and demonstrated that strains under positive selection not only increase in fitness but also increase in robustness. In contrast, strains under drift not only decreased in fitness but also decreased in robustness. There was a good overall correlation between fitness and robustness. We also tested whether there was a correlation between fitness and thermostability, and we observed that the correlation was imperfect, indicating that the fitness effects of mutations are exerted in part at a level other than changing the resistance of the protein to temperature.

INTRODUCTION

Error-prone replication in RNA viruses results in the development of quasispecies populations (14), clouds of closely related mutants in mutation-selection balance (57). In quasispecies populations, increased genetic robustness can provide a selective advantage (811), because a smaller number of offspring are lost to deleterious or lethal mutations. Genetic robustness here is defined as phenotypic invariance despite mutational pressure (12). In terms of fitness landscapes, selection for robustness favors those populations that sit on broad fitness peaks instead of narrow fitness peaks. Studies on digital organisms showed the preference for this type of broad peaks and led to the expression “survival of the flattest” (13). Many of the studies addressing the relevance of genetic robustness on the evolution of RNA molecules are computer analyses and simulated evolution (11, 1417). This approach has led to the identification of selection for robustness in hepatitis C virus genomes (18) and microRNA (19).

Vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) provided the first evidence that a low-fitness strain could outcompete a high-fitness strain (20), and these results were confirmed with phage phi-6 (21). One can predict that, all else being equal, the evolution of robustness is a function of the strength of selection, and that environmental factors that diminish selection also result in less robustness. Complementation is one such factor (2225), because the phenotype of one strain is not always determined by its genetic makeup and, instead, is the result of a gene product from another strain. High levels of complementation, which occur at a high multiplicity of infection (MOI), would result in lower overall robustness. Studies on phage phi-6 in which robustness was determined in mutation-accumulation experiments showed that strains evolving at low MOI without complementation overall were more robust than viruses evolving at high MOI with complementation (26). In other studies, viral populations were mutagenized prior to determining changes in robustness, and the results are difficult to reconcile: while mutagenized VSV seemed to increase in robustness (27), the evidence was lacking in mutagenized lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (28). However, RNA viruses often do not replicate in the presence of mutagens, so these studies are not necessarily relevant to understanding natural evolution or to predict the applicability of specific models. Previous work from our group indicated that VSV strains evolving under predominant random drift, but without mutagen, have defects in adaptability and potentially decreased robustness (29).

Understanding robustness is of particular relevance for the development of antiviral drugs and vaccines. Lethal mutagenesis (30) consists of increasing the mutation rates to produce populations with so many mutations that genetic information is lost and the virus cannot replicate (3, 6, 31). This approach would have limited value if the virus can adapt by increasing its robustness (32), but computer simulations suggest that genetic robustness by itself is unlikely to prevent extinction by lethal mutagenesis (33). In picornaviruses there seems to be a correlation between robustness and sensitivity to lethal mutagenesis (34). The major drawback of live-attenuated vaccines is the possibility of reversion during replication in the vaccinee. In simple terms, reversion is a case of adaptation to the human host, and because this adaptation depends on the availability of beneficial variation, it is easy to imagine that a more robust vaccine strain would also be a safer vaccine strain. However, whether increased robustness limits or favors evolvability is controversial (3537).

Theoretical and molecular considerations provide a link between genetic robustness and thermostability (3840), and work on phage phi-6 showed that clones with high robustness evolved greater thermostability than clones with low robustness (41). Work on microRNA is controversial, and while the experimental results seemed to show uncorrelated genetic robustness and thermal tolerance (19), there is disagreement on the interpretation of data (42).

In the present report, we used unmutagenized VSV strains to test whether increased or relaxed selection led to changes in genetic robustness and whether there is a correlation between robustness and thermostability. We analyzed a collection of strains that we had generated by plaque-to-plaque passages (43, 44) or by large-population passages (29). Plaque-to-plaque passages minimize selection, while large-population passages maximize selection. Our results indicated that, as predicted, in the absence of selection there was a loss of robustness, while in the presence of selection robustness improved. We also found that robustness does not need to covary with thermostability in VSV; however, in the absence of selection, the VSV genetic architecture seems to impose a moderately strong relationship between robustness and thermostability. Finally, unexpectedly, thermostability increased during plaque-to-plaque passages, even though robustness declined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cells and viruses.

We used BHK-21 cells for all infections. For cell growth, we used minimal essential medium (MEM) with Hank's salts supplemented with 0.6% PP3 (Difco) and 7% bovine calf serum (BCS). The same medium was used for plaque assays, except that PP3 was omitted. For viral infections, we used MEM with Hank's salts supplemented with 7% fetal bovine serum (FBS). We used agarose (0.2%) to make semisolid overlays, and all incubations were done at 37°C. We worked with vesicular stomatitis virus, Indiana serotype, Mudd Summer's strain, obtained from John Holland (UCSD). The wild type (wt) is sensitive to I1 monoclonal antibody (MAb). MARM U is an I1 MAb-resistant mutant with a single substitution in amino acid 256 of the G glycoprotein (45). We had previously subjected the wt to a continuous regimen of positive selection in BHK-21 cells by repeated large-population passages (2 × 105 PFU/passage), as previously described (29). Three replicas were randomly selected for the present study, and these were labeled w25A (fitness of 3.1 ± 0.3), w25D (fitness of 4.5 ± 1.2), and w25E (fitness of 3.9 ± 2.1). From MARM U we carried out many replicas of 20 plaque-to-plaque passages (46). This regimen minimizes selection and results in overall fitness loss (44, 4648). Most of these mutants have been previously characterized in terms of phenotypic and genomic changes (29, 43, 44). We used plaque-to-plaque passages to generate the following strains (with their fitness in parentheses): MRa (1.17 ± 0.27), MRb (1.01 ± 0.05), Jerry (0.45 ± 0.03), MRd (0.82 ± 0.07), MRe (0.92 ± 0.08), MRf (0.93 ± 0.03), MRg (0.55 ± 0.08), MRi (0.041 ± 0.001), MRj (0.95 ± 0.05), Otto (0.78 ± 0.02), MRl (0.66 ± 0.06), MRm (0.15 ± 0.07), MRo (1.0 ± 0.2), MRp (0.39 ± 0.05), MRq (0.6 ± 0.1), MRr (0.43 ± 0.08), MRy (1.23 ± 0.03), and MRz (0.43 ± 0.08). All except MRa, MRg, MRo, and MRz were sequenced (44). We also used strains derived from MARM U that had evolved under positive selection for 25 passages and increased their fitness (29): UF (2.6 ± 0.7), UG (5.2 ± 1.8), and UH (5.7 ± 1.5).

Fitness determinations.

Fitness was measured in direct competition as previously described (45, 49). For strains derived from the wt, we used MARM U as a reference, and for strains derived from MARM U we used the wt as a reference. In summary, the two competitors were mixed and the mixtures used to determine their relative ratios using plaque assays in the presence and absence of I1 MAb and also to carry out a competition passage with 2 × 105 PFU. After 20 to 24 h, virus titers reached approximately 1010 PFU/ml, and the progeny from the competition was used for quantification of ratios and to carry out a second competition passage under the same conditions. After several passages, the log changes in ratio were represented against time, and the antilogarithm of the slope of the fit was the fitness value.

Robustness measurements.

We used resistance to mutagenesis as a surrogate of robustness. We seeded T-25 flasks with BHK-21 cells, and after overnight growth we treated the resulting semiconfluent monolayers with 5 ml of 5-fluorouracil (FU) solution dissolved in MEM plus FBS at a final concentration of 0 (control), 10, 35, or 100 μg/ml. After 6.5 h of incubation at 37°C, during which the drug concentration inside cells equilibrates, the monolayers were infected with approximately 105 PFU, and the infections were monitored for cytopathic effect (CPE), which developed more slowly with increasing concentrations of mutagen, so in the absence of mutagen it was complete at 24 h postinfection, in the presence of 10 μg/ml it took 48 h, and in the presence of 35 or 100 μg/ml it took 72 h. All strains were recovered at the same time in the presence of a given amount of drug. When CPE was complete, we recovered the viral yields and determined titers by duplicate plaque assay. We then normalized titers by dividing them by the control titer.

To quantify robustness, we regressed log-transformed, normalized titers against the square root-transformed FU concentrations. The data were nearly linear after this transformation for all mutants (see the figures in the supplemental material). The regression line was fit without an intercept, since the log-transformed, normalized titer has to be zero by definition. We used the slope of the line as our measure of robustness. All slope values are negative, and a more negative slope indicates more sensitivity to FU and, thus, less robustness.

Mutant frequency determinations.

For wt and derived populations, we determined the frequency of I1-resistant mutants. Samples from frozen stocks were diluted as needed and titrated in triplicate plaque assays without I1 to calculate total virus concentration. In parallel, we used more concentrated samples (typically 3 to 4 orders of magnitude more concentrated) to perform plaque assays in the presence of excess concentrations of I1 in the agarose overlay. Importantly, we did not treat virus with antibody prior to plating, because this treatment would lead to significant underestimation of mutant frequencies due to phenotypic mixing and hiding (50, 51). The plaque numbers under these conditions would represent the number of MARM mutants in the stock. To calculate mutant frequency, we determined the MARM averages divided by wt averages.

MARM U and derived populations are already resistant to I1 and other antibodies directed to site A, such as I3 (52, 53), therefore we used I14, another antibody that recognizes a different antigenic site (site B) (52, 53). The procedures we followed were the same as those for I1-resistant mutant frequency, except for the antibody change in the semisolid agarose overlays.

Quantitation of physical particle-to-infectious-particle ratios.

Total genome copy number in virus stocks was measured using a tagged reverse transcription (RT) primer system in order to increase strand specificity (54). For RNA standards, we used RNA transcribed from pVSV, a plasmid containing the full-length sequence of VSV (unpublished results). pVSV was linearized with SpeI, and T3 polymerase (Promega) was used in vitro to produce a full-length, negative-sense RNA transcript identical to the VSV genome. The transcribed RNA was cleaned using an RNeasy Minikit (Qiagen). RNA transcript concentrations were determined spectrometrically, and sizes and concentrations were verified via formaldehyde gel. The RNA transcripts were then serially diluted. Total RNA from each dilution and from virus samples was isolated using the QIAamp viral RNA kit (Qiagen). Reverse transcription was performed using an RT primer (5′ GGCAGTATGGTGTTAACGATGATATCATGCTCAAAGAGGCC 3′) containing viral sequence recognizing VSV genomic nucleotides (nt) 4664 to 4683 and a nonviral tag sequence (in boldface). Briefly, 2 μl of RNA was mixed with 20 pM of RT primer and 8 μl of RNase-free water. RNA was denatured at 70°C for 5 min and then allowed to rest on ice for 1 min. Superscript III (Invitrogen) and RNase OUT (Invitrogen) were added, and the reaction was carried out at 50°C for 30 min. The enzyme was inactivated at 94°C for 5 min, and all samples were diluted 100-fold. Real-time PCR cycling was then performed using as the forward primer the tag sequence 5′ GGCAGTATGGTGTTAACGATG 3′ and as the reverse primer the viral sequence 5′ TCAGGAATTCTCTTGTGGCATAGTC 3′ (nt 4784 to 4808). Not using viral sequences in one of the primers reduces nonspecific priming events (55). A TaqMan probe was used for fluorescent signaling covering VSV nucleotides 4737 to 4762 (AAGTCCACGATTTTGAGACCGACGAG). The probe contains 6-carboxyfulorescein (6-FAM) at the 5′ end, which emits at 520 nm, and blocks fluorescence via Iowa Black FQ at the 3′ end. The sensitivity of this assay when reading RNA transcripts is on the scale of 1,000 copies in the RT reaction, although for standard curves only an RNA copy range of 4 × 106 to 4 × 1011 copies per reaction was used. Real-time PCR was carried out on a LightCycler 1.2 Carousel (Roche) under the following conditions: 95°C at 10 min to activate the enzyme, and then 40 cycles at 95°C for 10 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 1 s, with fluorescent acquisition occurring following the 72°C extension step. This amplification protocol yields a 167-bp product with a melting temperature of 74.5°C, which was verified using SYBR green melting curves. Copy numbers for viral RT reactions were calculated based on the in vitro-transcribed RNA standards.

Determination of thermostability.

We measured thermostability at 37 and 39°C. We took 500 μl of virus stock in an Eppendorf tube and placed it in a 37°C incubator. We took 100-μl samples at time zero, diluted each sample as needed after 1, 2, and 3 days, and performed plaque assays in triplicate. The slope of virus survival versus time gives a measurement of thermostability. We ruled out a potential contribution of aggregation and adhesion to the tube wall in all of the bottleneck strains with mutations in the G ORF, which resulted in values that were not significantly different from those from assays in plastic tubes (P = 0.243 by paired t test).

RESULTS

Robustness increases during adaptive evolution.

One of the predictions of quasispecies theory is that adaptation will produce populations of increased robustness. We tested this hypothesis by determining sensitivity to FU in VSV populations generated after 25 large-population passages (w25A, w25D, and w25E). Under these conditions, selection for increased fitness is the predominant evolutionary force, and viral fitness increases consistently (29, 56). Figure 1A shows that the populations under selection had a significantly higher resistance to FU than the wt progenitor (P = 0.006 by one-sample t test; n = 3). (We calculated robustness/resistance to FU as the slope in a regression of the log-transformed, normalized viral titer against the square root of the FU concentration [see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material]. More-negative numbers imply lower robustness.)

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Evolution under selection. (A) Changes in robustness. The adapted wt strains have significantly elevated robustness compared to the wt. (B) Changes in the ratio between physical particles and PFU. The adapted wt strains have significantly lower ratios. (C) Mutant frequency versus robustness for the three adapted wt strains. Mutant frequency seems to increase with robustness. However, this trend is not significant.

Plaque assays measure live virus and cannot give estimates of lethal mutations. We tested whether differences in FU sensitivity correlate to changes in the frequency of mutants carrying lethal mutations by determining the physical particle/infectious particle ratios. We used quantitative reverse transcription-PCR to measure the number of genomic RNA copies, which represents the number of physical particles in VSV. The RNA molecule/PFU ratios of strains under selection (w25A, w25D, and w25E) were significantly lower than that of the wt progenitor (P = 0.01 by one-sample t test; n = 2) (Fig. 1B), suggesting that the deleterious mutation rate was lower under selection, providing additional evidence that these viral populations have higher robustness.

We tested whether the increased resistance to FU was due to differences in the number of mutations incorporated during mutagenesis. For instance, more resistance could be the result of higher polymerase fidelity or of decreased affinity for the drug. If that had been the case, we would expect an inverse correlation between mutant frequency and resistance to FU. We infected BHK-21 monolayers in the presence of 10 μg/ml FU, and we measured the frequency of I1-resistant mutants among the progeny. We found that mutant frequency increased with robustness; however, this trend was not significant (Fig. 1C), and none of the strains under selection had lower mutant frequencies than the wt. Therefore, we can rule out increased polymerase fidelity as a contributor to increased resistance to FU.

Robustness is lost during random drift.

There are several environmental factors that decrease the effectiveness of selection. Selection in viral populations may be minimized by coinfection because of complementation, which leads to the overall loss of robustness in the RNA phage phi-6 (26). Another means to minimize selection is through the chance transmission of individual viral particles. This type of regimen represents the most extreme bottleneck, and it can be performed easily in the laboratory by randomly picking individual plaques (46). Under these conditions, random drift dominates and there is overall fitness loss (46). We hypothesized that robustness would evolve by following the same pattern, so there would be an overall loss of robustness.

We tested 16 VSV strains generated from MARM U by 20 plaque-to-plaque passages. As we did before, we first determined their sensitivity to FU (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material) and compared it to that of their MARM U progenitor. Figure 2A shows the results, which supported our hypothesis. All 16 strains were more sensitive to FU than the MARM U progenitor. This result was highly significant (P = 0.000015 by one-sample t test; n = 16).

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Evolution under drift. (A) Changes in robustness. The MR strains have significantly reduced robustness compared to MARM U. (B) Changes in the ratio between physical particles and PFU. There is no significant difference between MARM U and the MR strains. (C) Mutant frequency versus robustness for MR strains (without the MRz outlier; r = 0.34; P = 0.27). We observe no correlation between mutant frequency and robustness.

The next experiment consisted of determining physical particle/PFU ratios. There were significant variations among strains (Fig. 2B), but overall there were no changes in the ratios (P = 0.15 by one-sample t test; n = 16).

Finally, we investigated the possibility that the differences in sensitivity to FU were due to differences in polymerase accuracy in the presence of the mutagen. Once again, we calculated mutant frequency in these populations after replication in the presence of 10 μg/ml FU. Because they are all progeny of MARM U, they are already fully resistant to I1 antibody, thus we tested resistance to I14 antibody, which recognizes a different antigenic site in the G glycoprotein (52, 53). We did not find any correlation between mutant frequency and robustness (r = −0.014; P = 0.96; n = 13), so we could not explain lower robustness as a result of higher mutation rates (Fig. 2C). This result is consistent with our previous finding that MRr and MRb have genomic mutant frequencies that do not differ from that of their MARM U progenitor (29).

A correlation between fitness and robustness.

Quasispecies theory predicts that selection affects two phenotypic traits: fitness and robustness. We found that a regimen that minimizes selection, such as plaque-to-plaque passages, overall resulted in both fitness loss and robustness loss (Fig. 3; also see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). In contrast, we found that a regimen that maximizes selection, such as large-population passages, produced strains with increased fitness and increased robustness (Fig. 3; also see Fig. S1). Furthermore, taking together the results for all strains, we found an excellent and statistically significant correlation between fitness and robustness (Fig. 3), which is consistent with the theoretical predictions under consideration.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Fitness versus robustness for all strains used in this study. Symbols refer to strains: solid circle, MR strains; open circle, MARM U; solid triangles, adapted wt strains; open triangle, wt. There is a strong positive correlation between log-transformed fitness and robustness (dotted line; r = 0.57; P = 0.009; without the MRq outlier, r = 0.85 and P = 4.197e−06).

An imperfect correlation between robustness and thermostability.

The theory of plastogenetic congruence posits that genetic robustness and thermostability will have a positive correlation (38). We tested whether this was the case by testing the thermostability of strains under selection or random drift. The wt strains under selection showed increased robustness (see above), but there was no overall change in their thermostability (P = 0.60 by one-sample t test; n = 3) (Fig. 4). In contrast, the strains under random drift showed reduced robustness (see above), yet their thermostability was increased both at 37°C (P = 0.01 by one-sample t test; n = 16) (Fig. 4A) and at 39°C (P = 0.008 by one-sample t test) (Fig. 4B). Strains under selection that had MARM U as the progenitor behaved the same as the wt under selection, so there were no significant changes in thermostability (P = 0.075 by one-sample t test). There was a positive correlation between thermostability and robustness for strains evolved under random drift (r = 0.58; P = 0.018; n = 16) (Fig. 4, dotted line), yet there was no such correlation when we considered all strains of this study, irrespective of their origin or evolutionary history (r = −0.05; P = 0.84; n = 21) (Fig. 4). In aggregate, these results show that thermostability and robustness can evolve independently in VSV, yet the genetic architecture of VSV imposes a moderate link between thermostability and robustness when selection is absent.

Fig 4.

Fig 4

Thermostability versus robustness for all strains used in this study. Symbols refer to strains: solid circle, MR strains; open circle, MARM U; solid triangles, adapted wt strains; open triangle, wt. There is a positive correlation between thermostability and robustness for MR strains at 37°C (dotted line; r = 0.58; P = 0.018; without the MRi outlier, r = 0.79 and P = 0.0004) (A) and at 39°C (dotted line; r = 0.74; P = 0.016) (B).

DISCUSSION

We have shown that the mutational robustness of VSV can change substantially during evolution, even when robustness itself is not under selection. As theory predicts, simple selection for increased fitness leads to the evolution of increased robustness; it is likely that the virus maximizes fitness at least in part by reducing the deleterious effect of mutations. In contrast, under random drift, robustness declines significantly. This finding again supports the theoretical argument that robustness is an evolved property (16, 38, 57).

The results presented here are consistent with previous work in which we demonstrated low MRr robustness using fitness distributions (29). Here, we used sensitivity to FU to come to the same conclusion. Furthermore, MRr was one of the most sensitive strains, with only MRz and Jerry having lower values (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). In contrast, using fitness distributions, we were unable to find an adaptability defect in MRb, and only after a period of adaptation was there evidence of low robustness (29). However, using sensitivity to FU, we found a difference between the robustness of MRb (−1.84 ± 0.099) and its progenitor, MARM U (−1.55 ± 0.035). This result demonstrates that measuring resistance to mutagenesis is a more sensitive method than the time-consuming alternative of measuring the fitness of individual plaques to produce fitness distributions.

Interestingly, all of the strains under random drift had some loss of robustness, even those that had increased in fitness (MRa and MRy). There was no correlation between robustness and number of mutations accumulated during drift (not shown), and we identified loss of robustness in strains that differed from the MARM U progenitor in only two mutations (MRb, MRe, and MRl). This result is not surprising because of the mounting evidence of widespread epistasis throughout the genomes of RNA viruses (44, 5861).

There was no difference between the robustness of MARM U (−1.55 ± 0.03) and the wt (−1.57 ± 0.04), but surprisingly, we found significant differences in thermostability. MARM U was significantly more thermostable than the wt (P = 0.015 by two-sample t test; difference in means, 0.12). The fact that the difference between the two strains is a single mutation in the glycoprotein that results in a change in antibody recognition (53) raises the possibility of a correlation between antigenicity and thermostability, which we are currently exploring.

Work on RNA (38) and proteins (62) has led to the notion that mutational robustness and thermostability should be correlated. In these simple macromolecules, most mutations are deleterious because they induce unfolding or misfolding. The more thermostable an RNA molecule or protein is, the more it is protected from the destabilizing effects of mutations and, hence, the more robust. To what extent this reasoning transfers to higher biological levels, such as the fitness of an entire RNA virus, remains unclear, but there are mathematical models that connect the fitness effects of mutations in virus and bacteria with their effect on thermostability (63, 64). Results from phage phi-6 are consistent with the predictions of these models (65), while our results are not always so. Perhaps this difference in the behavior of the two systems is due to the presence of a bilipid membrane in the eukaryotic virus but not in the phage. We found a moderate correlation between thermostability and robustness in strains propagated under genetic drift. This correlation shows that the underlying genetic architecture of VSV does impose a relationship between these two quantities. However, the correlation disappeared when we considered all strains in the study, not just the ones evolved under drift. In particular, and unexpectedly, thermostability in strains subjected to drift was much higher than thermostability in either the wt or strains evolved for high fitness. It seems that in VSV, an increase in fitness leads to a decrease in thermostability, even though it tends to be accompanied by an increase in robustness. The molecular basis for this relationship remains unknown.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental material

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are most grateful to Douglas Lyles and John Connor for the kind gift of I1 and I14 hybridomas and antibodies. Arthur Chan and Katrina Ober provided technical assistance.

Work was supported by funds from the University of Toledo Bridge Program (to I.S.N.).

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 13 February 2013

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02796-12.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Biebricher CK. 1983. Darwinian selection of self-replicating RNA molecules. Evol. Biol. 16:1–52 [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Eigen M. 1971. Self-organization of matter and the evolution of macromolecules. Naturwissenschaften 58:65–523 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Eigen M. 1992. Steps towards life. A perspective on evolution. Oxford University Press, New York, NY [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Eigen M, McCaskill J, Schuster P. 1989. The molecular quasispecies. Adv. Chem. Phys. 75:149–263 [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Domingo E, Biebricher CK, Eigen M, Holland JJ. 2001. Quasispecies and RNA virus evolution:principles and consequenes. Landes Bioscience, Georgetown, TX [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Domingo E, Holland JJ. 1997. RNA virus mutations and fitness for survival. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 51:151–178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Domingo E, Sheldon J, Perales C. 2012. Viral quasispecies evolution. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 76:159–216 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Schuster P, Swetina J. 1988. Stationary mutant distributions and evolutionary optimization. Bull. Math. Biol. 50:635–660 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Swetina J, Schuster P. 1982. Self-replication with errors. A model for polynucleotide replication. Biophys. Chem. 16:329–345 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Wilke CO. 2001. Adaptive evolution on neutral networks. Bull. Math. Biol. 63:715–730 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Wilke CO. 2001. Selection for fitness versus selection for robustness in RNA secondary structure folding. Evolution 55:2412–2420 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Waddington CH. 1957. The strategy of the genes; a discussion of some aspects of theoretical biology. Allen and Unwin, London, United Kingdom [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Wilke CO, Wang JL, Ofria C, Lenski RE, Adami C. 2001. Evolution of digital organisms at high mutation rates leads to survival of the flattest. Nature 412:331–333 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Forster R, Adami C, Wilke CO. 2006. Selection for mutational robustness in finite populations. J. Theoretical Biol. 243:181–190 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Jorg T, Martin OC, Wagner A. 2008. Neutral network sizes of biological RNA molecules can be computed and are not atypically small. BMC Bioinformatics 9:464 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-464 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Wagner A. 2000. Robustness against mutations in genetic networks of yeast. Nat. Genet. 24:355–361 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Wagner A. 2008. Robustness and evolvability: a paradox resolved. Proc. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 275:91–100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Churkin A, Cohen M, Shemer-Avni Y, Barash D. 2010. Bioinformatic analysis of the neutrality of RNA secondary structure elements across genotypes reveals evidence of direct evolution of genetic robustness in HCV. J. Bioinf. Comp. Biol. 8:1013–1026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Borenstein E, Ruppin E. 2006. Direct evolution of genetic robustness in microRNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103:6593–6598 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. de la Torre JC, Holland JJ. 1990. RNA virus quasispecies populations can suppress vastly superior mutant progeny. J. Virol. 64:6278–6281 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Burch CL, Chao L. 2000. Evolvability of an RNA virus is determined by its mutational neighbourhood. Nature 406:625–628 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Novella IS, Reissig DD, Wilke CO. 2004. Density-dependent selection in vesicular stomatitis virus. J. Virol. 78:5799–5804 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Turner PE, Chao L. 1999. Prisoner's dilemma in RNA phage phi-6. Nature 398:441–443 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Wilke CO, Novella IS. 2003. Phenotypic mixing and hiding may contribute to memory in viral quasispecies. BMC Microbiol. 3:11 doi:10.1186/1471-2180-3-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Wilke CO, Reissig DD, Novella IS. 2004. Replication at periodically changing multiplicity of infection promotes stable coexistence of competing viral populations. Evolution 58:900–905 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Montville R, Froissart R, Remold SK, Tenaillon O, Turner PE. 2005. Evolution of mutational robustness in an RNA virus. PLoS Biol. 3:e381 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030381 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Sanjuan R, Cuevas JM, Furio V, Holmes EC, Moya A. 2007. Selection for robustness in mutagenized RNA viruses. PLoS Genet. 3:e93 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Martin V, Grande-Perez A, Domingo E. 2008. No evidence of selection for mutational robustness during lethal mutagenesis of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus. Virology 378:185–192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Novella IS, Presloid JB, Zhou T, Smith-Tsurkan SD, Ebendick-Corpus BE, Dutta RN, Lust KL, Wilke CO. 2010. Genomic evolution of vesicular stomatitis virus strains with differences in adaptability. J. Virol. 84:4960–4968 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Loeb LA, Essigmann JM, Kazazi F, Zhang J, Rose KD, Mullins JI. 1999. Lethal mutagenesis of HIV with mutagenic nucleoside analogs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96:1492–1497 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Crotty S, Andino R. 2002. Implications of high RNA virus mutation rates: lethal mutagenesis and the antiviral drug ribavirin. Microbes Infect. 4:1301–1307 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Martin R, Arenas C, Daros JA, Covarrubias A, Reyes JL, Chua NH. 2007. Characterization of small RNAs derived from Citrus exocortis viroid (CEVd) in infected tomato plants. Virology 367:135–146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. O'Dea EB, Keller TE, Wilke CO. 2010. Does mutational robustness inhibit extinction by lethal mutagenesis in viral populations? PLoS Comput. Biol. 6:e1000811 doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000811 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Graci JD, Gnadig NF, Galarraga JE, Castro C, Vignuzzi M, Cameron CE. 2012. Mutational robustness of an RNA virus influences sensitivity to lethal mutagenesis. J. Virol. 86:2869–2873 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Aguirre J, Lazaro E, Manrubia SC. 2009. A trade-off between neutrality and adaptability limits the optimization of viral quasispecies. J. Theor. Biol. 261:148–155 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Cuevas JM, Moya A, Sanjuan R. 2009. A genetic background with low mutational robustness is associated with increased adaptability to a novel host in an RNA virus. J. Evol. Biol. 22:2041–2048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Draghi JA, Parsons TL, Wagner GP, Plotkin JB. 2010. Mutational robustness can facilitate adaptation. Nature 463:353–355 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Ancel LW, Fontana W. 2000. Plasticity, evolvability, and modularity in RNA. J. Exp. Zool. 288:242–283 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Krakauer DC, Plotkin JB. 2002. Redundancy, antiredundancy, and the robustness of genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:1405–1409 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Wilke CO, Adami C. 2001. Interaction between directional epistasis and average mutational effects. Proc. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 268:1469–1474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. McBride RC, Ogbunugafor CB, Turner PE. 2008. Robustness promotes evolvability of thermotolerance in an RNA virus. BMC Evol. Biol. 8:231 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-8-231 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Szollosi GJ, Derenyi I. 2009. Congruent evolution of genetic and environmental robustness in micro-RNA. Mol. Biol. Evol. 26:867–874 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Novella I. 2004. Negative effects of genetic bottleneck on the adaptability of vesicular stomatitis virus. J. Mol. Biol. 336:61–67 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Novella IS, Ebendick-Corpus BE. 2004. Molecular basis of fitness loss and fitness recovery in vesicular stomatitis virus. J. Mol. Biol. 342:1423–1430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Holland JJ, de la Torre JC, Clarke DC, Duarte E. 1991. Quantitation of relative fitness and great adaptability of clonal populations of RNA viruses. J. Virol. 65:2960–2967 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Duarte EA, Clarke DK, Moya A, Domingo E, Holland JJ. 1992. Rapid fitness losses in mammalian RNA virus clones due to Muller's ratchet. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89:6015–6019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Chao L. 1990. Fitness of RNA virus decreased by Muller's ratchet. Nature 348:454–455 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Escarmis C, Davila M, Charpentier N, Bracho A, Moya A, Domingo E. 1996. Genetic lesions associated with Muller's ratchet in an RNA virus. J. Mol. Biol. 264:255–267 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Duarte EA, Novella IS, Ledesma S, Clarke DK, Moya A, Elena SF, Domingo E, Holland JJ. 1994. Subclonal components of consensus fitness in an RNA virus clone. J. Virol. 68:4295–4301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Holland JJ, de la Torre JC, Steinhauer DA, Clarke DC, Duarte EA, Domingo E. 1989. Virus mutation frequencies can be greatly underestimated by monoclonal-antibody neutralization of virions. J. Virol. 63:5030–5036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Valcarcel J, Ortin J. 1989. Phenotypic hiding–the carryover of mutations in RNA viruses as shown by detection of MAR mutants in influenza virus. J. Virol. 63:4107–4109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Lefrancois L, Lyles DS. 1982. The interaction of antibody with the major surface glycoprotein of vesicular stomatitis virus. 1. Analysis of neutralizing epitopes with monoclonal antibodies. Virology 121:157–167 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Vandepol SB, Lefrancois L, Holland JJ. 1986. Sequences of the major antibody-binding epitopes of the Indiana serotype of vesicular stomatitis-virus. Virology 148:312–325 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Purcell MK, Hart SA, Kurath G, Winton JR. 2006. Strand-specific, real-time RT-PCR assays for quantification of genomic and positive-sense RNAs of the fish rhabdovirus, Infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus. J. Virol. Methods 132:18–24 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Peyrefitte CN, Pastorino B, Bessaud M, Tolou HJ, Coussinier-Paris P. 2003. Evidence for in vitro falsely-primed cDNAs that prevent specific detection of virus negative-strand RNAs in dengue-infected cells: improvement by tagged RT-PCR. J. Virol. Methods 113:19–28 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Novella IS, Duarte EA, Elena SF, Moya A, Domingo E, Holland JJ. 1995. Exponential increases of RNA virus fitness during large population transmissions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92:5841–5844 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. de Visser JAGM, Hermisson J, Wagner GP, Meyers LA, Bagheri HC, Blanchard JL, Chao L, Cheverud JM, Elena SF, Fontana W, Gibson G, Hansen TF, Krakauer D, Lewontin RC, Ofria C, Rice SH, von Dassow G, Wagner A, Whitlock MC. 2003. Perspective: Evolution and detection of genetic robustness. Evolution 57:1959–1972 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Bonhoeffer S, Chappey C, Parkin NT, Whitcomb JM, Petropoulos CJ. 2004. Evidence for positive epistasis in HIV-1. Science 306:1547–1550 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Burch CL, Chao L. 2004. Epistasis and its relationship to canalization in the RNA virus phi 6. Genetics 167:559–567 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Kryazhimskiy S, Dushoff J, Bazykin GA, Plotkin JB. 2011. Prevalence of epistasis in the evolution of influenza A surface proteins. PLoS Genet. 7:e1001301 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Martinez JP, Bocharov G, Ignatovich A, Reiter J, Dittmar MT, Wain-Hobson S, Meyerhans A. 2011. Fitness ranking of individual mutants drives patterns of epistatic interactions in HIV-1. PLoS One 6:e18375 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018375 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Bloom JD, Silberg JJ, Wilke CO, Drummond DA, Adami C, Arnold FH. 2005. Thermodynamic prediction of protein neutrality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102:606–611 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Chen PQ, Shakhnovich EI. 2010. Thermal adaptation of viruses and bacteria. Biophys. J. 98:1109–1118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Wylie CS, Shakhnovich EI. 2011. A biophysical protein folding model accounts for most mutational fitness effects in viruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108:9916–9921 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Knies JL, Izem R, Supler KL, Kingsolver JG, Burch CL. 2006. The genetic basis of thermal reaction norm evolution in lab and natural phage populations. PLoS Biol. 4:e201 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material

Articles from Journal of Virology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES