Abstract
Rapid mix - rapid freeze is a powerful method to study the mechanisms of enzyme-substrate reactions in solution. Here we report a protocol that combines this method with normal (non-resonance) Raman microscopy to enable us to define molecular details of intermediates at early time points. With this combined method, SHV-1, a class A β-lactamase, and tazobactam, a commercially available β-lactamase inhibitor, were rapidly mixed on the millisecond time-scale, then were flash-frozen by injecting into an isopentane solution surrounded by liquid nitrogen. The “ice” was finally freeze-dried and characterized by Raman microscopy. We found that, in solution at 25 milliseconds, the reaction is almost complete giving rise to a major population composed of the trans-enamine intermediate. Between 25 – 500 milliseconds, minor populations of protonated imine are detected, that have previously been postulated to precede enamine intermediates. However, within 1 second, the imines are converted entirely to enamines. Interestingly, with this method, we can measure directly the turnover number of SHV-1 and tazobactam. At 1 : 4 ratio (enzyme : inhibitor) or greater, the enzyme is completely inhibited, a number that agrees with the turnover number derived from steady-state kinetic methods. This application, employing non-intensity enhanced Raman spectroscopy, provides a general and effective route to study the early events in enzyme-substrate reactions.
In general, there are two ways to detect the early intermediates in an enzyme-substrate reaction: slow the reaction or trap the intermediate. By lowering reaction temperature, one can reduce the reaction rate to a detectable time range.1,2 Another approach is to switch on the reaction by the excitation from a pulse of light and then probe the intermediate with ultrafast spectroscopic tools.3,4 These techniques, however, are limited to specific reaction systems. With the advent of the rapid mixing - rapid quench technique the pace of studying meta-stable reaction intermediates accelerated significantly. The continuous improvement on mixers has made this technique as an attractive tool because of its short time scales and low sample consumption.5–9 The freeze-quenching technique was first introduced by Bray in 1961 where the mixed reactant solution is rapidly frozen by low-temperature isopentane (−130 °C).10
Raman or resonance Raman spectra of reaction intermediates in water have the potential of providing a plethora of information on enzyme mechanism.11–13 In 2003 Lin et al. combined ultrafast mixing with a rapid freeze-quenching device and could detect intermediates as early as 50 microseconds.14 The resulting ice containing the reaction intermediates gave high quality resonance Raman spectra. However, the intensities of normal (non-resonance) Raman spectra of biological molecules at millimolar concentrations are usually too weak to provide sufficient signal-to-noise data for analysis and this limitation remains when the intermediates are trapped in ice. We now report a protocol which allows us to obtain time-resolved normal Raman spectra of aqueous intermediates in the millisecond time scale. Rapid mix - rapid freeze methods were used to trap short-lived intermediates in isopentane at −110 °C. By freeze-drying the flash-frozen reaction mixture, high quality Raman difference spectra of the freeze-dried material were obtained in the presence and absence of substrate. These provided the Raman spectra of the substrate-based intermediates undergoing catalysis. With a commercial rapid mix apparatus (KinTek RQF-3), we are able to trap intermediate at 25 milliseconds and longer after mixing using approximately 0.5 milligram of protein at each time point.
β-lactamases confer antibiotic resistance to bacteria by hydrolyzing antibiotic drugs such as penicillins and cephalosporins.15,16 To date, more than 700 unique β-lactamases have been reported.17 According to their amino-acid sequences (Ambler method), β-lactamase enzymes are generally divided into four classes, classes A to D.18,19 Among the well-studied class A enzymes, SHV-1 and TEM-1 are the most commonly encountered enzymes in Gram-negative bacteria. To combat the hydrolytic activity of β-lactamase, clinical inhibitors of β-lactamase have been developed, such as clavulanic acid, sulbactam and tazobactam. Unlike β-lactam antibiotics, these competitive inhibitors can inhibit the enzyme by forming long-lived or irreversible intermediates in the active site of the enzyme.20 Unfortunately, bacteria also acquire resistance to these inhibitors due to mutations in β-lactamases.
For a decade, our laboratory has developed Raman crystallography to track reactions of the clinical inhibitors in single crystal of β-lactamase in real time.20 The spectroscopic analysis provides information about the chemical identity of the intermediates, their relative populations, and their rates of formation and disappearance. However, time-resolution in crystal studies is presently >1 min. Although inhibitor design will usually depend on the analysis of long-lived complexes in the crystal, it is imperative to understand early events on the reaction pathway in solution because these can reveal the identities of “stable” complexes.
We illustrate the adaptation of the rapid mix - rapid freeze method using the reaction between tazobactam, a commercially available “suicide inhibitor” of β-lactamases, and the SHV-1 β-lactamase, an important resistance determinant in Klebsiella pneumoniae. We have extensive experience on this reaction in single crystals20–26 and here we compare the reaction intermediates formed in crystal and solution environments. A partial reaction scheme is shown in Scheme 1.
Scheme 1.
Partial reaction scheme for tazobactam and class A beta lactamase enzymes.
When following the reaction in a single crystal of wild-type SHV-1, we showed that there is an equilibrium between major populations of protonated imine (Scheme 1), cis and trans-enamine (Scheme 1).20,26 The Raman difference spectrum for tazobactam reacting in a single crystal of SHV-1 β-lactamase is shown in Figure 1. The crucial underpinnings of the band assignments came from combined Raman and X-ray crystallographic experiments. Based on the literature, and kinetic data, the peaks near 1595 cm−1 reported in the first paper on tazobactam, sulbactam and clavulanic acid reacting in crystals of the E166A variant of SHV-1 were assigned to the stretching vibration of the –O–C(=O)–C=C–NH– fragment of trans-enamine.27 This prediction and the presence of the trans-enamine species was confirmed by subsequent X-ray analysis.28,29 Detailed analysis From Gaussian calculations (Table 1, below) has confirmed that the 1589 cm−1 feature is a characteristic marker band of the trans-enamine, and that the 1658 cm−1 band is due to the pro-trans imine (Scheme 1).20
Figure 1.
Partial Raman difference spectrum of the intermediate from the tazobactam reaction with SHV-1, in a single crystal after 20 minutes of soaking in 20 mM tazobactam.
Table 1.
Raman peak assignments for the major peaks in tazobactam/SHV-1 difference spectra shown in Figure 2.
Species | Wavenumber (cm−1) | Peak assignments |
---|---|---|
| ||
unreacted tazobactam | 1780 | C=O of β-lactam ring |
1491 | C=C of triazolyl ring | |
1401 | CO2− (symmetric stretch) at C3 position | |
1292 | breathing of triazolyl ring | |
1233 | N=N of triazolyl ring | |
| ||
imine | 1658 | C=NH+ of imine |
| ||
trans-enamine | 1596 | –O–C(=O) –C=C–NH– stretch of trans-enamine |
In Figure 1, the narrow bands at 1658 and 1589 cm−1 (that have 17 and 20 cm−1 widths at half height, respectively) suggest that the trans-enamine is in a single, well-defined conformation. The weak feature at 1678 cm−1 may be due to a minor population of pro-cis imine. In Kalp et al.,20 it was assigned to an amide I feature; however, the present band is too narrow to unambiguously make this assignment. Similarly, it is possible that the profile at 1589 cm−1 also contains a contribution from cis-enamine.
The tazobactam triazolyl ring has a fairly intense mode near 1290 cm−1 in aqueous solution (Figure 2, upper trace). In Figure 1, this mode appears to have multiple components and we ascribe these to several slightly different local binding sites on the enzyme for the triazole ring each giving rise to slightly different ring frequencies. Triazole also has a weak mode near 1240 cm−1. The feature in Figure 1 at 1241 cm−1 likely contains a contribution from the triazole mode and also from a NH bending mode from the enamine and / or protein peptide bonds.
Figure 2.
Partial Raman spectrum of tazobactam (20 mM, pH 7.0, top) and Raman difference spectra of tazobactam reacting with SHV-1; trapped intermediates in lyophilized powder between 25 and 1000 milliseconds after mixing. In the tazobactam spectrum the 1780 cm−1 feature corresponds to the stretch of carbonyl group in β-lactam ring.
Before comparing the results between in crystallo and in rapid mixing, we first investigated the effect of freeze-drying on the enzyme. We compared the Raman spectra of the SHV-1 crystal and freeze-dried powder. The resulting spectra are shown in supplementary materials Figure S1 and are very similar. The similarities in the amide I (1660 cm−1 region), amide III (1220 – 1320 cm−1 region) profiles indicate that there are no major changes in secondary structure after freeze-drying. This conclusion is supported by the similar profiles circa 530 cm−1. The latter is due to the S-S mode involving cysteine residues at positions 77 and 123,30 and the S-S stretch mode is sensitive to changes in conformation about these linkages.31 The small differences in Figure S1 are probably due to minor changes in loops and disordered sequences occurring upon dehydration.
To ensure that freeze-drying did not affect the function of SHV-1, the hydrolysis of nitrocefin by wild-type SHV-1 before and after freeze-drying was measured. Nitrocefin is used as a chromogenic substrate for SHV-1, which gives rise to an intense peak at 482 nm after it is hydrolyzed. Two identical aliquots of SHV-1 enzyme were used; one was tested immediately and the other one was lyophilized at −48 °C. The lyophilized enzyme was re-dissolved in water and the concentration was adjusted to equal that of the non-lyophilized sample. The non-lyophilized SHV-1 enzyme (1 μM) was assayed with nitrocefin in the absence or the presence of 1 μM or 10 μM of tazobactam. The change of the intensity at 482 nm was recorded to reflect the hydrolytic activity of SHV-1 enzyme on nitrocefin. The results are compared in Figure S2 to those using freeze-dried SHV-1 that was treated in exactly the same manner. The three pairs of kinetic traces overlap precisely, indicating SHV-1 retains essentially 100% activity in the freeze-drying process.
Figure 2 compares the Raman difference spectra for flash-frozen, acyl-enzyme intermediates, between 25 and 1000 milliseconds after mixing, with the spectrum of free aqueous tazobactam (upper trace). For the intermediates the broad band near 1595 cm−1 (approximately 45 cm−1 width at half height) is compelling evidence for the presence of enamine species, and the large bandwidth suggests a mixture of cis and trans species (Table 1). In Kalp et al.,20 similar sulbactam intermediates were suggested to have enamine marker bands at 1588 and 1605 cm−1, respectively. The sharp triazole peak at 1287 cm−1 (19 cm−1 width at half height) indicates that “natural line width” (of sharp features) in the lyophilized powder is approximately 20 cm−1 and is evidence that the broad line width of 1596 cm−1 in Figure 2 may be due to multiple isomers. The protonated imine peaks at 1658 (pro-trans) and 1673 cm−1 (pro-cis) in Figure 2 are narrow and if assigned correctly suggest a higher relative population of the pro-trans imine isomer in solution compared to pro-cis.
The relative population of pro-trans imine in the crystal (Figure 1) appears to be higher compared to the population of pro-trans imine in solution (Figure 2), and in crystallo, the intense imine peak remains at 60 min. Since in solution, the imine feature almost disappears at one second, the “lifetime” of the imine in the crystal is >103 times longer than in solution. Thus, in solution, at one second after mixing, the imine isomers seem to have essentially converted to enamine. We have detected the formation of enamine isomers quickly, within 25 milliseconds after mixing, that remain essentially unchanged after one second. These isomers are accompanied by the expected imine predecessors that convert to enamine within one second.
In order to measure the turnover number for SHV-1 β-lactamase enzyme, we mixed SHV-1 and tazobactam in different molar ratios (from 1 : 1 to 1 : 10). The reaction mixture was frozen after 20 seconds of mixing by injecting into isopentane at −110 °C. The Raman difference spectrum of each sample was acquired after freeze-drying of the flash-frozen materials. The intensities of the peaks around 1595 cm−1 in the difference spectra (enamine species) were measured, and the 1450 cm−1 protein peak in original spectra (before subtraction) was used as an internal standard. The intensity ratio was plotted against the ratio of tazobactam to enzyme, and the plot is shown in Figure 3. The enamine peak intensity is constant after reaching the ratio of 1:4 to 1:5, and it shows the turnover number is between 4 and 5, which agrees with the value of 5 obtained from kinetic methods.32
Figure 3.
Direct measurement of turnover number for tazobactam reaction with SHV-1 enzyme. It demonstrates that the enzyme is completely inhibited giving rise a maximum enamine population after 4 – 5 equivalents of tazobactam have been hydrolyzed.
In summary, we have reported the combination of rapid mixing - rapid freezing, and freeze-drying, with Raman microscopy to investigate the enzyme-substrate reaction. The sensitivity of Raman signal is enhanced by freeze-drying the sample. The results due to the binding of inhibitor to the active site of enzyme in rapid mixing show analogous intermediates compared to those in crystals. However, the lifetimes, in relative and absolute terms, are very different. The present results confirm the presence of a stable trans-enamine in solution and this is the species that can be used for strategy-based drug design.33 The method outlined herein should be widely applicable to other enzyme-substrate reaction.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by NIH GM54072 to Paul R. Carey. The authors are grateful to Dr. Mary D. Barkley for the loan of the KinTek instrument. Robert A, Bonomo is also supported by the VISN 10 GRECC, a Merit Review Award by the VHA, and NIH RO1-AI072219-05.
Footnotes
Supporting Information SI Figure 1 shows comparison of Raman spectrum of SHV-1 enzyme in crystal and freeze-dried powder. SI Figure 2 compares enzymatic activity of SHV-1 β-lactamase reacting with nitrocefin before and after lyophilization. SI Figure 3 shows a schematic picture of rapid mix - rapid quench apparatus. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org/.
REFERENCES
- (1).Auld DS. Methods Enzymol. 1993;226:553. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(93)26025-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (2).Barman T, Travers F, Balny C, Hui Bon Hoa G, Douzou P. Biochimie. 1986;68:1041. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9084(86)80178-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (3).Jones CM, Henry ER, Hu Y, Chan CK, Luck SD, Bhuyan A, Roder H, Hofrichter J, Eaton WA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:11860. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.24.11860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).Mines GA, Pascher T, Lee SC, Winkler JR, Gray HB. Chem Biol. 1996;3:491. doi: 10.1016/s1074-5521(96)90097-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (5).Bokenkamp D, Desai A, Yang X, Tai YC, Marzluff EM, Mayo SL. Analytical Chemistry. 1998;70:232. [Google Scholar]
- (6).Qu K, Vaughn JL, Sienkiewicz A, Scholes CP, Fetrow JS. Biochemistry. 1997;36:2884. doi: 10.1021/bi962155i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (7).Johnson TJ, Ross D, Locascio LE. Anal Chem. 2002;74:45. doi: 10.1021/ac010895d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (8).Pabit SA, Hagen SJ. Biophysical Journal. 2002;83:2872. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75296-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).Tanaka M, Matsuura K, Yoshioka S, Takahashi S, Ishimori K, Hori H, Morishima I. Biophys J. 2003;84:1998. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(03)75008-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (10).Bray RC. Biochem J. 1961;81:189. doi: 10.1042/bj0810189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (11).Carey PR. Annu Rev Phys Chem. 2006;57:527. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physchem.57.032905.104521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (12).Carey PR, Tonge PJ. Chemical Society Reviews. 1990;19:293. [Google Scholar]
- (13).Carey PR, Tonge PJ. Accounts of Chemical Research. 1995;28:8. [Google Scholar]
- (14).Lin Y, Gerfen GJ, Rousseau DL, Yeh SR. Anal Chem. 2003;75:5381. doi: 10.1021/ac0346205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (15).Bradford PA. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001;14:933. doi: 10.1128/CMR.14.4.933-951.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (16).Helfand MS, Bonomo RA. Curr Drug Targets Infect Disord. 2003;3:9. doi: 10.2174/1568005033342181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (17).Paukner S, Hesse L, Prezelj A, Solmajer T, Urleb U. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:505. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00085-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (18).Bush K, Jacoby GA. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2010;54:969. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01009-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (19).Fisher JF, Meroueh SO, Mobashery S. Chemical Reviews. 2005;105:395. doi: 10.1021/cr030102i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (20).Kalp M, Totir MA, Buynak JD, Carey PR. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:2338. doi: 10.1021/ja808311s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (21).Helfand KS, Totir MA, Carey MP, Hujer AM, Bonomo RA, Carey PR. Biochemistry. 2003;42:15398. doi: 10.1021/bi035716w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (22).Padayatti PS, Helfand MS, Totir MA, Carey MP, Hujer AM, Carey PR, Bonomo RA, van den Akker F. Biochemistry. 2004;43:843. doi: 10.1021/bi035985m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (23).Helfand MS, Taracila MA, Totir MA, Bonomo RA, Buynak JD, van den Akker F, Carey PR. Biochemistry. 2007;46:8689. doi: 10.1021/bi700581q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (24).Kalp M, Bethel CR, Bonomo RA, Carey PR. Biochemistry. 2009;48:9912. doi: 10.1021/bi9012098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (25).Che T, Bonomo RA, Shanmugam S, Bethel CR, Pusztai-Carey M, Buynak JD, Carey PR. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:11206. doi: 10.1021/ja303168n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (26).Carey PR, Chen Y, Gong B, Kalp M. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1814:742. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2010.08.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (27).Helfand MS, Totir MA, Carey MP, Hujer AM, Bonomo RA, Carey PR. Biochemistry. 2003;42:13386. doi: 10.1021/bi035716w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (28).Padayatti PS, Helfand MS, Totir MA, Carey MP, Hujer AM, Carey PR, Bonomo RA, van den Akker F. Biochemistry. 2004;43:843. doi: 10.1021/bi035985m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (29).Padayatti PS, Helfand MS, Totir MA, Carey MP, Carey PR, Bonomo RA, van den Akker F. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:34900. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M505333200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (30).Kuzin AP, Nukaga M, Nukaga Y, Hujer AM, Bonomo RA, Knox JR. Biochemistry. 1999;38:5720. doi: 10.1021/bi990136d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (31).Carey PR. Biochemical applications of Raman and resonance Raman spectroscopies. Academic Press; New York: 1982. [Google Scholar]
- (32).Helfand MS, Bethel CR, Hujer AM, Hujer KM, Anderson VE, Bonomo RA. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:52724. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M306059200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (33).Padayatti PS, Sheri A, Totir MA, Helfand MS, Carey MP, Anderson VE, Carey PR, Bethel CR, Bonomo RA, Buynak JD, van den Akker F. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:13235. doi: 10.1021/ja063715w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.