Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Contraception. 2012 Nov 12;88(1):74–82. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.004

Table 2.

Logistic regression model for factors associated with LARC uptake among discordant couples in Kigali, Rwanda (N=365) and Lusaka, Zambia (N=528)

Kigali, Rwanda Lusaka, Zambia
OR (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI) p-value
Questionnaire administered to:
 Woman alone 1.0 (Ref) 1.0 (Ref)
 Couple 1.18 (0.72, 1.94) 0.52 0.89 (0.60, 1.33) 0.58
Couple’s HIV serostatus at baseline
 Discordant (man is positive) 1.0 (Ref) 1.0 (Ref)
 Discordant (woman is positive) 1.25 (0.79, 1.99) 0.34 0.88 (0.61, 1.29) 0.58
HIV-positive partner on antiretroviral
therapy
 No 1.0 (Ref) 1.0 (Ref)
 Yes 0.84 (0.48, 1.48) 0.54 0.84 (0.50, 1.42) 0.51
Reproductive intentions
 Want a child in ≥3 years 1.0 (Ref) 1.0 (Ref)
 Do not want more children 1.84 (0.72, 4.69) 0.20 1.04 (0.62, 1.74) 0.88
Current contraceptive method
 None/condoms only 1.0 (Ref) 1.0 (Ref)
 Injectables 1.34 (0.74, 2.40) 0.33 0.48 (0.24, 0.98) 0.04*
 Oral contraceptives 1.51 (0.41, 5.52) 0.53 0.76 (0.42, 1.38) 0.37
Women age 0.95 (0.91, 1.00) 0.05* 0.95 (0.92, 0.99) 0.02*
Number of previous pregnancies 0.96 (0.83, 1.11) 0.56 1.04 (0.94, 1.17) 0.42

Adjusted for all other covariates in the table.

*

Statistically significant (p<0.05).