Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Microbiology logoLink to Indian Journal of Microbiology
. 2013 Feb 12;53(2):238–240. doi: 10.1007/s12088-013-0371-6

Quick Diagnosis of Human Brain Meningitis Using Omp85 Gene Amplicon as a Genetic Marker

Sandip K Dash 1, Minakshi Sharma 2, Shashi Khare 3, Ashok Kumar 1,
PMCID: PMC3626959  PMID: 24426115

Abstract

The usual diagnosis of life-threatening human brain bacterial meningitis are expensive, time consuming or non-confirmatory. A quick PCR based diagnosis of meningitis in cerebrospinal fluids (CSF) using specific primers of virulent Omp85 gene of Neisseria meningitidis can detect as low as 1.0 ng of genomic DNA (G-DNA) in 80 min for confirmation of bacterial meningitis caused by N. meningitidis infection. The 257 bp amplicon of Omp85 gene does not show homology with other suspected pathogens in CSF and can be used as a specific genetic marker for diagnosis of the disease.

Keywords: Genetic marker, Meningitis, N. meningitidis, Omp85 gene


Meningitis causes inflammation of the meninges (outer membrane covering) in the brain and spinal cord of the patients [1]. Meningitis is usually detected by biochemical tests, microscopy, latex agglutination, PCR, microarray and biosensors [25]. Recently, blot microarray and SPR biosensor were reported for detection of biological warfare agents [6, 7]. All these methods are time consuming, expensive and cumbersome. Boving et al. [8] reported an eight-plex PCR for simultaneous detection of Neisseria meningitidis, S. pneumoniae, E. coli, S. aureus, L. monocytogenes, S. agalactiae, herpes simplex virus and varicella-zoster virus which was time consuming. Omp85 (outer membrane protein) gene which is highly conserved in all the strains of N. meningitidis and assists for effective insertion of lipids and integral proteins into the outer membrane [9]. Omp85 gene can be used to develop genetic marker due to its virulence.

The patient 0.5 ml CSF samples (from National Centre for Disease Control) was centrifuged at 16,000×g for 1 min to remove the CSF and the pellet was used in 25 μl of PCR mix containing 1× PCR buffer (1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.01 M Tris–HCl, 0.05 M KCl, 0.01 % gelatin, pH 8.3), 0.4 mM dNTP mix (0.1 mM of each nucleotide), 0.4 μM of each forward (5′-CGTTTCCCAAGCAACCTGT-3′) and reverse primers (5′-AAATTCACGCCGTCGTATTC-3′) of Omp85 gene of N. meningitidis, 0.75U of Taq polymerase and de-ionized water. The PCR was carried out in a MJ Mini thermal cycler at an initial denaturation: 95 °C; 5 min followed by 30 cycles of denaturation: 95 °C; 4 s, annealing: 54 °C; 5 s, extension: 72 °C; 1 s and final extension: 3 min; 72 °C. The amplicons were separated at 80 V in 1.5 % agarose gel electrophoresis and analyzed in UV light.

For quantification of bacterial G-DNA, the pellet obtained from CSF containing bacteria was suspended in 0.5 ml of TE (10 mM Tris and 1 mM EDTA) buffer, pH 8.0 and heated at 95 °C for 5 min for cell lysis. The heated solution was further centrifuged at 16,000×g for 1 min to remove cell debris and the supernatant containing G-DNA was quantified by Nanodrop spectrophotometer. The sensitivity of the PCR method was performed using different concentrations of N. meningitidis G-DNA (0.5–5.0 ng) in 25 μl of PCR mix as described above. The amplicons were detected in a 1.5 % agarose gel using UV light.

The PCR product 257 bp Omp85 gene of N. meningitidis (Fig. 1a) was purified using GFX column and sequenced at The Centre for Genomics and Applications (TCGA), New Delhi (Fig. 1b) and N. meningitidisOmp85 gene, partial cds was submitted to NCBI [Accession No.HQ712171]. The PCR method can detect as low as 1.0 ng of G-DNA of N. meningitidis directly from CSF of meningitis patients in 80 min (Fig. 1c). The diagnosis of suspected bacterial meningitis patients (30 samples) were carried out using present available methods (Table 1) as well as PCR using 257 bp Omp85 gene amplicon (in 1.5 % agarose gel electrophoresis) as a genetic marker (Fig. 2). The data shows some false positive and negative results which are due to certain limitations of the test. For validation of the results, PCR was also carried out with 20 samples of N. meningitidis (MC58) and 06 samples each of E. coli (DH5α), S. typhi (CT 18), S. pyogenes (M 140) and M. tuberculosis (Smegmatis). Although, the biochemical tests showed false positive and false negative results with some of the samples but results with PCR using Omp85 genetic markers of 257 bp was found specific only to N. meningitidis, not with other possible pathogens (Table 2). Therefore, PCR amplicon of Omp85 gene can be used as a specific genetic marker for quick (80 min including electrophoresis) diagnosis of bacterial meningitis. Our method can save life of several patients during an outbreak of the bacterial meningitis disease.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

a Agarose gel electrophoresis (1.5 %) of PCR product in UV light, lane 1: 100 bp DNA ladder, lane 2: 257 bp PCR amplicon of Omp85. b Gene sequence of 257 bp Omp85 gene using reverse primer; c 1.5 % Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR product, lane 1: 257 bp Omp85 gene marker, lane 2, 3, 4 and 5 are PCR product with 5, 3, 2 and 1 ng G-DNA, respectively. Lane 6: PCR product was not formed with 0.5 ng of G-DNA

Table 1.

Diagnosis of suspected meningitis patients using present available methods and PCR with Omp85 amplicon as genetic marker

Results Microscopic Enzyme test Latex agglutination Biochemical test Omp85 genetic marker (257 bp)
Gram (−ve) Oxidase Catalase Glucose Sucrose
Positive 04 02 01 04 05 04 03
Negative 26 28 29 26 25 26 27
False positive 01 00 00 01 02 01 00
False negative 00 01 02 00 00 00 00

Gram staining, oxidase and catalase test, latex agglutination and biochemical test were performed as reported earlier [2]

Control: Sample containing N. meningitidis in CSF

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Agarose gel electrophoresis (1.5 %) of suspected patients of bacterial meningitis in UV light. Lane C- control (N.meningitidis in CSF), lane 9, 21 and 28 single band (infected patients) corresponding to 257 bp Omp85 genetic marker, lane 1–8, 10–20, 22–27 and 29–30 showed no bands (non infected)

Table 2.

Testing the cross reactivity of Omp85 gene amplicon (257 bp) as genetic marker with N. meningitidis, E. coli, S. typhi, S. pyogenes and M. tuberculosis

Samples Total No. Present methods of diagnosis [2] Omp85 genetic marker
Microscopic Gram stain Enzyme test LA test Biochemical test
Oxidase Catalase Glucose Sucrose
P N P N P N P N P N P N P N
N. meningitidis 20 20 18 02 17 03 19 01 15 05 01 19 20
E. coli 06 06 01 05 05 01 06 04 02 01 05 06
S. typhi 06 06 06 01 05 06 04 02 06 06
S. pyogenes 06 06 01 05 02 04 06 06 01 05 06
M. tuberculosis 06 06 NA NA NA NA NA 06

P Positive, N Negative, NA Not applicable

Acknowledgments

Financial support received under the DST project DST/TSG/ME/2008/37 is highly acknowledged. SKD thanks University Grant Commission, New Delhi for providing Senior Research Fellowship.

References

  • 1.Dash SK, Sharma M, Kumar A. Diagnostic techniques and treatment of meningitis. In: Houllis G, Karachalios M, editors. Meningitis: causes, diagnosis and treatment. New York: Nova Science Publishers Inc; 2012. pp. 203–223. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Negi SS, Grover SS, Rautela SS, Rawat DS, Gupta S, Khare S, Lal S, Rai A. Direct detection and serogroup characterization of Neisseria meningitidis from outbreak of meningococcal meningitis in Delhi. Iran J Microbiol. 2010;2:73–79. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dash SK, Sharma M, Khare S, Kumar A. rmpM gene as a genetic marker for human brain bacterial meningitis. Cell Mol Biol. 2012;58:24–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mahajan S, Sethi D, Seth S, Kumar A, Kumar P, Gupta KC. Construction of oligonucleotide microarrays (biochips) via thio-ether linkage for the detection of bacterial meningitis. Bioconjug Chem. 2009;20:1703–1710. doi: 10.1021/bc900162u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Patel MK, Solanki PR, Khare S, Gupta S, Malhotra BD, Kumar A. Electrochemical DNA sensor for Neisseria meningitidis detection. Biosens Bioelectron. 2010;25:2586–2591. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2010.04.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vanlahmuaka, Thavachelvam K, Tuteja U, Sarika K, Nagendra S, Kumar S. Reverse line blot macroarray for simultaneous detection and characterization of four biological warfare agents. Indian J Microbiol. 2012 doi: 10.1007/s12088-012-0330-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ghosh N, Gupta G, Boopathi M, Pal V, Singh AK, Gopalan N, Goel AK (2012) Surface plasmon resonance biosensor for detection of Bacillus anthracis, the causative agent of anthrax from soil samples targeting protective antigen. Indian J Microbiol. doi: 10.1007/s12088-012-0334-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 8.Boving MK, Pedersen LN, Møller JK. Eight-Plex PCR and liquid-array detection of bacterial and viral pathogens in cerebrospinal fluid from patients with suspected meningitis. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:908–913. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01966-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fitzpatrick DA, McInerney JO. Evidence of positive Darwinian selection in Omp85, a highly conserved bacterial outer membrane protein essential for cell viability. J Mol Evol. 2005;60:268–273. doi: 10.1007/s00239-004-0194-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES