Abstract
Mouse models of cancer represent powerful tools for analysing the role of genetic alterations in carcinogenesis. Using a mouse model that allows tamoxifen-inducible somatic activation (by Cre-mediated recombination) of oncogenic K-rasG12D in a wide range of tissues, we observed hyperplasia of squamous epithelium located in moist or frequently abraded mucosa, with the most dramatic effects in the oral mucosa. This epithelium showed a sequence of squamous hyperplasia followed by squamous papilloma with dysplasia, in which some areas progressed to early invasive squamous cell carcinoma, within 14 days of widespread oncogenic K-ras activation. The marked proliferative response of the oral mucosa to K-rasG12D was most evident in the basal layers of the squamous epithelium of the outer lip with hair follicles and wet mucosal surface, with these cells staining positively for pAKT and cyclin D1, showing Ras/AKT pathway activation and increased proliferation with Ki-67 and EdU positivity. The stromal cells also showed gene activation by recombination and immunopositivity for pERK indicating K-Ras/ERK pathway activation, but without Ki-67 positivity or increase in stromal proliferation. The oral neoplasms showed changes in the expression pattern of cytokeratins (CK6 and CK13), similar to those observed in human oral tumours. Sporadic activation of the K-rasG12D allele (due to background spontaneous recombination in occasional cells) resulted in the development of benign oral squamous papillomas only showing a mild degree of dysplasia with no invasion. In summary, we show that oral mucosa is acutely sensitive to oncogenic K-ras, as widespread expression of activated K-ras in the murine oral mucosal squamous epithelium and underlying stroma can drive the oral squamous papilloma–carcinoma sequence. Copyright © 2011 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keywords: oral mucosa, hyperplasia, carcinoma, K-ras, pAKT, pERK, cyclin D1
Introduction
Ras genes are some of the most widely studied cancer-related genes, due to their frequent activation in human tumours 1. These small GTPases act as molecular switches that transfer information from the membrane to the nucleus. Ras proteins interact with multiple downstream effector pathways, the best studied of which are those involved in mitogenic signalling, such as the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway, and survival, such as the phosphoinositol-3 kinase (PI3K)/PDK/AKT pathway 2. Among ras oncogenes, K-ras is the most frequently activated in human tumours, with missense mutations at codons 12, 13, and 61 resulting in decreased GTPase activity and constitutive signalling 3. Although in some countries, such as India, the prevalence of K-RAS mutations in oral squamous cell carcinomas is as high as 50%, due to environmental factors, in Western countries such as the UK the prevalence is much lower, ∼5% 4–6. Following analysis of micro-RNA expression patterns in human oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC), Shin et al 6 concluded that miR-181a functions as an OSCC suppressor by targeting the K-RAS oncogene, suppressing expression of mutant K-RAS in OSCC cell lines and inhibiting their growth in culture, indicating the importance of mutated K-RAS as a driver mutation for OSCC growth. However, it remains to be established how mutated K-ras contributes to oral carcinogenesis in this small proportion of cases.
Unveiling the role of oncogenic K-ras in the development of human cancer has been greatly aided by the ability to manipulate the mouse genome in order to develop tumour models of sporadic K-ras activation, which closely recapitulate those events responsible for human disease 7–14. Indeed, the Jackson et al allele (LSL-K-rasG12D) 8 has been widely used to identify the effects of oncogenic K-ras in specific tissues, including the oral cavity 15, lung and GI tract 16, the haematopoietic system, 17, 18 and pancreas 16, 19, 20. This has been achieved by breeding LSL-K-rasG12D mice with mouse lines that express Cre from tissue-specific inducible promoters.
In the present study, we bred LSL-K-rasG12D mice with a mouse line carrying an inducible Cre recombinase (RosaCreERT2). Administration of tamoxifen to these mice results in somatic expression of oncogenic K-ras in a wide variety of tissues. We observed hyperplasia of moist or frequently abraded squamous mucosa, with the most dramatic effects seen in the oral cavity: squamous papillomas showing dysplasia with areas of focal invasion (squamous cell carcinoma). Alternatively, sporadic expression of the K-rasG12D allele (due to spontaneous recombination) only resulted in the development of squamous papillomas with mild dysplasia, following a long latency. Thus, we show the acute sensitivity of the oral mucosa to oncogenic K-ras in oral tumour development.
Materials and methods
Mice and dosing regimes
Mice were housed in accordance with Home Office regulations (UK) and fed a diet of mouse pellets and water ad libitum. Mice carrying the Lox-stop-Lox (LSL)-K-rasG12D allele 8 were kindly provided by David Tuveson (Cancer Research Institute, Cambridge, UK). Mice carrying the tamoxifen-inducible Cre knocked into the Rosa locus (RosaCreERT2) 21 and mice carrying a floxed LacZ reporter gene with an internal stop codon knocked into the Rosa locus (RosaR26R) 22 were kindly provided by Jos Jonkers (Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). All mice were on a mixed 129/Sv-C57BL/6J background. To achieve somatic expression of oncogenic K-ras, 8-week-old mice carrying both the Lox-stop-Lox (LSL)-K-rasG12D and RosaCreERT2 alleles (LSL-K-ras+/G12D; RosaCreERT2/CreERT2; hereafter termed K-ras+/G12D) and wild-type littermate controls (LSL-K-ras+/+; RosaCreERT2/CreERT2; hereafter termed K-ras+/+) were given a single intraperitoneal dose of tamoxifen (4-OHT; Tamoxifen Free Base, MP Biomedicals, Cleveland, OH, USA) dissolved in sterile sunflower oil. Some mice were also left ‘untreated’ to assess spontaneous levels of tumour development (due to ‘leaky’ Cre expression from the RosaCreERT2 allele). For 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) experiments, mice were dosed intraperitoneally with 0.5 mg of EdU (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK) dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.5) 1 week after tamoxifen treatment and sacrificed 16 h later. For all studies, the mice were examined twice daily for signs of morbidity, at which time they were sacrificed (if not done so earlier) and a full necropsy was performed.
Genotyping
Genotyping for the LSL-K-rasG12D 8, RosaCreERT2 21, and RosaR26R 22 alleles was performed as described previously. Excision of the stop cassette from the LSL-K-rasG12D allele in tamoxifen-dosed mice was determined using PCR amplification with primers KrasSLRec3A: 5′-GCA GCT AAT GGC TCT CAA AGG-3′ and KrasSLRec3B: 5′-TTG GCT CCA ACA CAG ATG TTC-3′ (62 °C annealing temperature for 5 cycles, followed by 60 °C for 30 cycles). The PCR products were resolved in a 3% agarose gel with the wild-type and activated K-rasG12D alleles generating a 196 bp and a 240 bp band, respectively.
Reverse transcription (RT)-PCR and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis
Total RNA (1.5 µg) isolated from oral tissue using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was treated with Turbo Dnase (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) and reverse-transcribed using the BD Sprint Kit with random hexamers (BD Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA), according to the manufacturers' instructions. The cDNA was then subjected to PCR and RFLP analysis to distinguish between the wild-type and mutant K-ras alleles, as previously described 15.
Histological analysis
All tissues and tumours were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin (NBF) at room temperature over-night. Samples were then transferred to 75% ethanol, embedded in paraffin, sectioned, and stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E).
Immunofluorescence, immunohistochemistry, and β-gal staining
Immunofluorescence analysis was performed on tissue samples that had been embedded and frozen in OCT compound at − 70 °C. Sections were probed with anti-phospho-ERK 1/2, anti-phospho-AKT (#9106 and #4058, Cell Signalling Technology, New England BioLabs, Hertfordshire, UK), and anti-cyclin D1 (RM-9104, Neomarkers, Thermo Scientific, Cheshire, UK). Following incubation with primary antibodies, positive cells were visualized with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibodies for phospho-AKT and cyclin D1, and Alexa Fluor 547-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibodies for phospho-ERK (Invitrogen).
Whole mounts of lip and oral epithelium were prepared as described previously 23. EdU incorporation was detected with a Click chemistry kit (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Digital images were captured using confocal microscopes (Zeiss LSM 510 META and NIKON Eclipse TE2000-U).
Immunohistochemical analysis was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections using either rabbit polyclonal anti-β galactosidase antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), rabbit polyclonal anti-cytokeratin 6 (Abcam), rabbit monoclonal anti-cytokeratin 13 (EPR3671; Abcam) or rat anti-mouse Ki-67 (Dako UK Ltd, Ely, UK). Immunohistochemical signal was detected by secondary biotinylated donkey anti-rabbit antibody (Stratech Scientific, Suffolk, UK), followed by a Vector ABC tertiary kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. All immunohistochemistry was performed on a BondMax machine (Vision Biosystems, Newcastle, UK), according to the manufacturer's instructions, by the Human Research Tissue Bank at Addenbrooke's Hospital (Cambridge, UK).
The raw array CGH data may be found at ftp://ftp. sanger.ac.uk/pub/da1/KRAS_lvdw.
Results
Hyperplasia and neoplasia of the oral mucosa in response to expression of K-rasG12D
K-ras+/G12D mice were given a single intraperitoneal dose of 1 mg of tamoxifen at 8 weeks of age, resulting in activation of the oncogenic K-ras, as demonstrated by PCR analysis on DNA extracted from a wide range of tissues 1 week after induction (Figure 1A). Within 14 days of dosing, a marked hyperproliferative phenotype was observed in the oral cavity of K-ras mice, but not K-ras+/+ mice (Figures 1B and 1C). At this time-point, the study was terminated and the mice were sacrificed as they had become progressively malnourished from an inability to feed or drink. Histological analysis of the oral mucosa from these mice showed squamous hyperplasia (Figure 1D), papilloma formation with mild–moderate dysplasia (Figure 1E), and areas of early invasive squamous cell carcinoma (Figure 1F), often with combinations of adjacent squamous hyperplasia, dysplastic papilloma, and focal invasion. The total penetrance of this phenotype (25/25 mice), together with the rapid development of the oral tumours, suggests that few additional mutations or epigenetic changes are required for mutant K-ras-induced oral squamous hyperplasia and papilloma formation with neoplasia, supported by CGH analysis of tumours from these mice revealing no gross genomic instability (Supporting information, Supplementary Figure 1).
Molecular analysis of oral lesions by RT-PCR and RFLP confirmed that the mutant (activated) K-rasG12D allele was being expressed (Figure 1G). In the absence of an antibody specific for the activated form of K-ras, we used Rosa26 reporter (Rosa+/R26R) mice as a surrogate marker for Cre-mediated activation of K-ras, as these mice carry a loxP-flanked STOP cassette that prevents expression of a lacZ gene; however, when crossed with a mouse line carrying Cre recombinase, the STOP cassette is removed and lacZ is expressed in the cells/tissues where Cre is expressed 22. Immunohistochemical analysis of β-galactosidase expression in the oral mucosa of K-ras+/G12D; Rosa+/CreERT2; Rosa+/R26R mice dosed with 1 mg of tamoxifen at 8 weeks of age showed oral squamous hyperplasia, papilloma formation, and dysplastic papilloma (with irregular basal aspect) with strong β-galactosidase expression in stromal cells as well as in the squamous epithelium (Figures 1H and 1I and Supporting information, Supplementary Figure 2). This shows that there is widespread Cre recombinase activity in the oral mucosa of tamoxifen-treated mice carrying the RosaCreERT2 allele and thus implies widespread expression of oncogenic K-rasG12D in the oral mucosa.
Widespread hyperplastic changes in multiple tissues in response to expression of K-rasG12D
At the time of sacrifice (2 weeks post-tamoxifen administration), the K-rasG12D-expressing mice also showed hyperplastic changes in many other tissues containing moist or frequently abraded squamous mucosa, and occasionally other epithelia, both squamous (anal canal, forestomach, vagina, cervix, paw skin pads) and non-squamous (ovary, endometrium) (Supporting information, Supplementary Figure 3). In addition, hyperplasia was noted in haematopoietic organs (bone marrow, spleen, and liver). However, the lungs showed multiple adenocarcinomas (Supporting information, Supplementary Figure 3). This hyperproliferative and neoplastic phenotype was observed in all the mice examined (n = 10), although the relative degree of involvement of each of the tissues varied from mouse to mouse. No other tissues histologically examined (pancreas, kidney, bladder, testes, small intestine, colon, caecum, oesophagus, thymus, heart, salivary gland, brain, eye, ear, and tongue) showed any evidence of hyperplasia or neoplasia. No hyperproliferation of any tissues was observed in tamoxifen-dosed wild-type littermates (K-ras+/+ mice; n = 4 mice sacrificed 31 days after dosing).
Hyperplasia of the oral mucosa occurs in the squamous epithelium of the mucosal surface, hair follicles, and sebaceous glands
To examine more closely the marked proliferative response of the oral mucosa to oncogenic K-ras, we treated K-ras+/G12D mice with 1 mg of tamoxifen (or vehicle) and then 1 week later treated the mice with 0.5 mg of EdU to mark S-phase cells. The mice were sacrificed and tissue samples collected 16 h after EdU dosing. At this time-point, the lips and oral mucosa appeared macroscopically indistinguishable from vehicle-dosed littermates (‘controls’); however, whole-mount preparation of the lips and oral mucosa showed marked hyperplasia compared with the lips and oral mucosa from control animals (Figures 2A–2F). Microscopic examination of the hair-bearing external epithelium of the outer lip (Figures 2A and 2D), wet oral mucosa (Figures 2C and F), and interface between them (Figures 2B and 2E) revealed the hyperproliferative phenotype to be in the surface mucosal epithelium, hair follicles, and sebaceous glands, as shown by the high percentage of EdU-positive cells in these areas.
Hyperplasia of the squamous epithelium in the oral mucosa signals via the pAKT pathway
Several Ras effector pathways, including the Raf/MEK/ ERK (MAPK) and PI3K/AKT kinase cascades, promote cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival 24. To establish the mechanism(s) by which activated K-ras could be causing hyperproliferation in the oral mucosa, we stained cryosections from 1 mg tamoxifen-dosed K-ras+/G12D mice and vehicle-dosed controls (1 week after dosing) with antibodies to known downstream targets of Ras signalling, specifically phosphorylated AKT (pAKT) and Erk (pERK) (Figures 2G–2L). pAKT was detected in the hair follicles and basal layers of surface squamous epithelium in both induced and vehicle-treated mice (Figures 2G and 2J). However, the undosed mice showed positive staining in 1–3 layers of cells (Figure 2H), whereas in the dosed mice pAKT was typically detectable in 3–6 layers of cells in the epithelium (Figure 2K), with little positivity in the stromal cells. In contrast, pERK staining was mainly observed in the stromal cells of the dermis and not in the squamous epithelium of the surface or the hair follicles (Figures 2G and 2J). In corroboration that this oral cavity hyperproliferation is taking place downstream of K-ras signalling, the hair follicles and basal layers of the squamous epithelium also strongly immunostained for cyclin D1 expression (Figures 2I and 2L) and the proliferation markers EdU and Ki-67 (Figures 2, 3K, and 3L).
Although the most impressive immunofluorescent evidence for increased pAKT signalling occurred in the hair-bearing skin of the outer lip, overall there is evidence of altered proliferation (increased EdU and Ki-67 staining) with cyclin D1 expression in the squamous epithelium of the wet oral mucosa, which is the cell type giving rise to the hyperplasia–papilloma–dysplasia–carcinoma sequence in this model. Thus, pAKT seems to be more active in mutant K-ras-expressing squamous epithelium, probably contributing to the hyperproliferative phenotype. Indeed, increased expression of pAKT has been reported in ameloblastic tumours (a benign odontogenic neoplasm which can undergo malignant transformation) 25 and benign neoplasms of the salivary gland (pleomorphic adenomas and myoepitheliomas) 26.
Hyperplastic and neoplastic epithelium shows evidence of aberrant differentiation
The oral squamous epithelium is a self-renewing tissue with terminal differentiation, involving changes in the expression of cytokeratins, which can be studied as major differentiation markers of stratified epithelia. Cytokeratins have also been associated with different stages of tumour progression in human oral tumours 27, 28. To determine whether the oral tumours that developed 14 days after 1 mg tamoxifen treatment of K-ras+/G12D mice exhibited changes in the differentiation patterns, we examined the expression patterns of key cytokeratins expressed in oral epithelia. Specifically, we studied cytokeratin 13 (CK13), found consistently in the suprabasal layers of normal squamous epithelia of the oral cavity with decreased/absent expression in squamous cell dysplasia/carcinoma 29–31, and cytokeratin 6 (CK6), not normally expressed above the basal layer of normal squamous epithelium, but rapidly induced in suprabasal (post-mitotic) cells during conditions of hyperproliferation 32. We found that CK13 expression was decreased from full thickness expression in normal oral squamous epithelium (Figure 3A) to only a few superficial cell layers of expression in oral papillomas (Figure 3B), and to only the most differentiated parts (the superficial or upper epithelium) of hyperplastic and dysplastic squamous epithelium (Figure 3C).
There was no detectable CK13 expression in the invasive tongues and clusters of squamous cell carcinoma (Figure 3D). In contrast, CK6 expression was broadened from the basal and first suprabasal layers seen in normal oral squamous epithelium (Figure 3E) to almost all cell layers in oral papillomas (Figure 3F), and there was expression throughout the full thickness of the hyperplastic and dysplastic squamous epithelium (Figure 3G). High expression was also found in invasive tongues and clusters in the squamous cell carcinoma (Figure 3H). These changes were found in all tamoxifen-dosed K-ras+/G12D mice (n = 7), but not in tamoxifen-dosed K-ras+/+ (n = 5) or vehicle-dosed K-ras+/G12D (n = 5) control mice. Similar changes in cytokeratin expression patterns were reported in the oral tumours (benign squamous papillomas) from LSL-K-rasG12D; K5.Cre*PR1 mice dosed with RU486 in the oral cavity 15, and have been observed in human oral neoplasms 27, suggesting that changes in differentiation markers in the oral tumours that developed in K-ras+/G12D mice resemble those observed in human patients.
In addition, in keeping with the EdU results from mice collected 7 days after exposure to tamoxifen (Figures 2A–2F), oral mucosa from tamoxifen-dosed K-Ras+/G12D mice collected 14 days after dosing showed an increased number of squamous epithelial cells in several suprabasal layers staining positively for the cell proliferation marker Ki-67 (Figures 3K and 3L), but no stromal cell positivity, compared with vehicle-dosed controls that showed only basal layer epithelial positivity (Figures 3I and 3J).
Effects of using low doses of tamoxifen
When lower doses of tamoxifen were administered (1–10 µg), to activate oncogenic K-ras in fewer cells, thymic lymphomas (Figure 4A) and pulmonary adenocarcinomas (Figure 4B) were observed in 100% of the K-ras mice within 14–40 weeks post-treatment (7/7 of 10 µg-dosed mice and 5/5 of 1 µg-dosed mice) but never in the tamoxifen-treated K-ras+/+ controls (0/10). One mouse treated with low-dose tamoxifen, however, developed a macroscopic ‘outgrowth’ on the lip/oral mucosa, which histopathologically presented as a squamous papilloma with only a mild degree of dysplasia and no evidence of invasion, with no adjacent hyperplasia of the surrounding squamous epithelium (Figure 4C).
Similarly, sporadic activation of K-ras (due to the RosaCreERT2 allele producing low levels of background recombination in the absence of the inducer 21) resulted in decreased survival of untreated K-ras mice (Figure 4D), with mice presenting with pulmonary adenocarcinomas (33/33 cases, 100%) and leukaemia/lymphoma (27/33 cases, 81%). In addition, some mice (8/33, 24%) also developed macroscopic ‘outgrowths’ on their lips and oral mucosa (Figure 4E). These were similar to the lesion shown in Figure 4C, appearing as a single papillomatous outgrowth with only a mild degree of dysplasia and no adjacent hyperplasia of the surrounding squamous epithelium (Figure 4F), and were markedly different to the large areas of hyperplasia and papillomas with dysplasia (with some areas of focal invasion) seen in the K-ras mice dosed with 1 mg of tamoxifen (Figures 1B–1E). In addition, some mice also showed variable degrees of proliferation in the anal squamous epithelium (9/33, 27%), with the most severe cases presenting with anal prolapse. In contrast, mice carrying wild-type alleles at the K-ras locus (K-ras+/+ mice) never developed tissue hyperplasia or tumours (12/12 mice) within 12 months. These results suggest that acute expression of K-rasG12D throughout the abraded and wet mucosal squamous epithelium has a profound field effect on these tissues that differs from the phenotype observed when isolated cells or clones of cells stochastically express K-rasG12D. Interestingly, array comparative genome hybridization (aCGH) analysis of oral tissue from the spontaneously developed tumours (papillomas; n = 3) did not show any more genomic instability than that of the induced tumours (n = 5) (Supporting information, Supplementary Figure 1).
PCR amplification of genomic DNA from spontaneously developed tumours in these K-ras mice showed the presence of the recombined K-ras allele (Figure 4G). Interestingly, however, some tissues, such as the liver, showed the presence of the recombined K-rasG12D allele but no histopathological abnormality (Figure 4G). Conversely, some tissues, such as the pancreas, did not show the presence of the activated K-rasG12D allele (Figure 4G), which explains why tumours were never observed in this tissue 33.
Discussion
Oral cancer has a high mortality and morbidity, with a 5-year survival rate for patients of ∼50% 34. This high lethality is ascribed to the advanced state of malignancy at the time of detection, as when detected early they can be cured in 80–90% of cases. Thus, understanding the molecular mechanisms involved in initiation and progression to malignancy of oral cancer may help earlier detection to improve the prognosis of the disease and the development of novel therapeutic strategies. Around 5% of human oral cancers have mutated K-ras, but its role as a driver mutation is uncertain. To this end, we developed a mouse model of widespread somatic expression of oncogenic K-ras in the adult mouse by crossing LSL-K-ras mice with tamoxifen-inducible RosaCreERT2 mice. Dosing of the offspring with 1 mg of tamoxifen resulted in the development of a marked hyperproliferative and neoplastic phenotype in the oral cavity in K-ras mice (but not K-ras+/+ mice) within 14 days of treatment. This phenotype involved the lips and oral mucosa, showing a sequence of squamous hyperplasia followed by squamous papilloma with dysplasia, in which some areas progressed to early invasive squamous cell carcinoma (Figure 1). The total penetrance of this phenotype, together with the rapid development of the oral tumours, suggests that few additional mutations or epigenetic changes are required for K-ras-induced oral squamous hyperplasia and dysplastic papilloma formation in mice. Previous studies have shown that mutant K-ras expression in mice (using K-ras4bG12D, K-rasG12D or K-rasV12 alleles) is sufficient to initiate lung adenomas and adenocarcinomas 7, 9, 10, and pancreatic tumours 33 with few additional genetic or epigenetic alterations.
Although our primary interest was in characterizing the oral hyperproliferative and neoplastic phenotype observed in these K-rasG12D-expressing mice, other hyperplastic and neoplastic pathological abnormalities were also observed. Hyperproliferation was observed in sites of wet or frequently abraded squamous mucosa in addition to the mouth, including the anus, forestomach, vagina/cervix, and paw skin pads. Other studies have also recorded the presence of squamous papillomas in similar tissues (ear and snout skin, anal and vulvo-vaginal squamous mucosa, oesophageal and forestomach squamous epithelium 9, 11, 18), as well as lymphoma/leukaemia 9, 18, and lung adenoma/adenocarcinomas 8–11, 18 in oncogenic K-ras-expressing mice. In addition, K-RAS is one of the most commonly mutated oncogenes in human lung cancer 35, and oncogenic RAS mutations have also been detected in haematological malignancies 36, 37.
Interestingly, however, some tissues consistently showed the presence of the activated K-rasG12D allele, yet never developed any pathological abnormality, such as the liver, suggesting that expression of oncogenic K-ras at physiological levels is not sufficient to induce unscheduled proliferation in certain cell types, and mutated K-ras does not seem to initiate tumourigenesis in certain tissue types, as shown in the liver here and previously 12. Conversely, some tissues did not show the presence of the activated K-rasG12D allele, such as the pancreas, which explains why tumours of this tissue were never observed despite being seen in other studies 33 and oncogenic K-RAS being a known inducer of pancreatic neoplasia (over 90% of cases of pancreatic cancer show mutations in K-RAS 38).
The reason why these animals develop hyperplasia and neoplasia in the lips and oral mucosa more readily than in other tissues (apart from the lung) may be partly due to the fact that the oral squamous mucosa has high rates of proliferation due to the necessity to maintain a tissue which is frequently exposed to mild abrasion or chewing-related trauma. Furthermore, the pre-existing signalling network status of the oral squamous epithelium may be particularly sensitive to activation of the K-Ras/PI3K/AKT pathway, making these cells more prone to tumour development compared with other tissues. The stromal cells under the oral epithelium also showed Cre-mediated activation using the β-gal reporter system, indicating mutant K-ras activation in these cells as well, corroborated by pERK activation detected in these cells by immunofluorescence. Therefore, cross-talk between K-rasG12D-expressing squamous epithelium and K-rasG12D-expressing adjacent stroma may have cooperated to generate rapidly developing hyperplasia and neoplasia manifested in the squamous epithlium. Oncogenic K-rasG12D-induced proliferation in the oral cavity has previously been reported in two studies. In the first study, ∼30% of LSL-K-ras+/G12D; Mx1+/Cre mice developed squamous papillomas in the oral mucosa 18. However, there was no further analysis of these tumours as this was not relevant to the study. In the second study, LSL-K-rasG12D; K5.Cre*PR1 mice dosed with RU486 in the oral cavity (to induce K-rasG12D expression under the control of the K5 promoter) developed exophytic papillomas of the oral mucosa, tongue, and palate 16–24 weeks after exposure 15. Histologically, these tumours were classified as benign, showing marked hyperplasia and up to severe dysplasia, but with no evidence of invasion into the submucosal tissue.
The phenotype observed by Caulin et al 15 is similar to that observed in our sporadic study in which some of the mice (24%) developed squamous papillomas with only a mild degree of dysplasia, but no invasion. The isolated nature of these tumours and the absence of hyperplasia in the surrounding normal squamous epithelium suggest that these tumours have originated as a result of clonal expansion of a single cell expressing an activated K-rasG12D allele. In contrast, mice with widespread K-rasG12D expression in the oral mucosal epithelial and stromal cells showed acute and generalized hyperproliferation of the oral squamous epithelium that rapidly progressed to dysplastic papillomas with focal invasion. This raises the possibility that mutant K-ras expression in a field of epithelial and stromal cells does not just alter the behaviour of individual cells, but may have a ‘community effect’.
Thus, the data presented here show that tumour development induced by oncogenic K-rasG12D is highly dependent on the cell type, with oral squamous epithelium displaying acute sensitivity to oncogenic K-ras. For the oral cavity, we have shown that oncogenic K-ras is an important inducer of tumourigenesis that functions via the pAKT pathway to initiate squamous hyperplasia, with progression to papilloma formation with dysplasia and ultimately invasive squamous carcinoma, producing lesions with differentiation characteristics resembling those shown in human oral neoplasms. Furthermore, if low doses of tamoxifen are used, or spontaneous recombination occurs, the development of squamous papillomas with dysplasia after a long latency may allow the testing of anti-RAS preventative and therapeutic agents.
Acknowledgments
We thank Doug Strathdee for designing the protocol for determining excision of the stop cassette from the LSL-K-rasG12D allele in tamoxifen-dosed mice. LvdW is supported by a Fellowship from the Kay Kendall Leukaemia Foundation; MJA is supported by Cancer Research UK; DJA is supported by Cancer Research UK and the Wellcome Trust; MPA is supported by an FP7 European Union Marie Curie Fellowship (FP7-PEOPLE-2007-2-1-IEF -220016); and PHJ is supported by the Medical Research Council. The Human Research Tissue Bank is supported by the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre.
Author contribution statement
LvdW conceived and carried out experiments and analysed data. MPA carried out experiments and analysed data. PHJ conceived experiments and analysed data. AR carried out experiments and analysed data. MJA conceived and carried out experiments and analysed data. DJA conceived experiments and analysed data. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript and had final approval of the submitted version.
SUPPORTING INFORMATION ON THE INTERNET
The following supporting information may be found in the online version of this article.
Figure S1. Array CGH analysis of chromosomal alterations in the oral tumours from K-rasG12D mice.
Figure S2. Immunohistochemical analysis of β-galactosidase expression in the oral cavity of K-ras mice.
Figure S3. Widespread tissue hyperproliferation in K-rasG12D-expressing mice.
References
- 1.Bos JL. ras oncogenes in human cancer. A review. Cancer Res. 1989;49:4682–4689. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Young A, Lyons J, Miller AL, et al. Ras signaling and therapies. Adv Cancer Res. 2009;102:1–17. doi: 10.1016/S0065-230X(09)02001-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Adjei AA. Blocking oncogenic Ras signaling for cancer therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:1062–1074. doi: 10.1093/jnci/93.14.1062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Das N, Majumder J, DasGupta UB. Ras gene mutations in oral cancer in eastern India. Oral Oncol. 2000;36:76–78. doi: 10.1016/s1368-8375(99)00058-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brookman KC, Schönleben F, Qiu W, et al. Mutational analyses of the BRAF, KRAS, and PIK3CA genes in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol. 2010;110:632–637. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shin KH, Bae SD, Hong HS, et al. miR-181a shows tumor suppressive effect against oral squamous cell carcinoma cells by downregulating K-ras. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010 doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.12.055. Dec 14 [Epub ahead of print]. PMID: 21167132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fisher GH, Wellen SL, Klimstra D, et al. Induction and apoptotic regression of lung adenocarcinomas by regulation of a K-Ras transgene in the presence and absence of tumour suppressor genes. Genes Dev. 2001;15:3249–3262. doi: 10.1101/gad.947701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jackson EL, Willis N, Mercer K, et al. Analysis of lung tumour initiation and progression using conditional expression of oncogenic K-ras. Genes Dev. 2001;15:3243–3248. doi: 10.1101/gad.943001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Johnson L, Mercer K, Greenbaum D, et al. Somatic activation of the K-ras oncogene causes early onset lung cancer in mice. Nature. 2001;410:1111–1116. doi: 10.1038/35074129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Meuwissen R, Linn SC, van der Valk M, et al. Mouse model for lung tumourigenesis through Cre/lox controlled sporadic activation of the K-Ras oncogene. Oncogene. 2001;20:6551–6558. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Guerra C, Mijimolle N, Dhawahir A, et al. Tumour induction by an endogenous K-ras oncogene is highly dependent on cellular context. Cancer Cell. 2003;4:111–120. doi: 10.1016/s1535-6108(03)00191-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Luo F, Brooks DG, Ye H, et al. Conditional expression of mutated Kras accelerates intestinal tumourigenesis in Msh2-deficient mice. Oncogene. 2007;26:4415–4427. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Luo F, Hamoudi R, Brooks DG, et al. Stem cell gene expression changes induced specifically by mutated Kras. Gene Expr. 2007;14:101–115. doi: 10.3727/105221607783417583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Luo F, Brooks DG, Ye H, et al. Mutated KrasAsp12 promotes tumourigenesis in ApcMin/+ mice more in the large than small intestines, with synergistic effects between Kras and Wnt pathway. Int J Exp Pathol. 2009;90:558–574. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2613.2009.00667.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Caulin C, Nguyen T, Longley MA, et al. Inducible activation of oncogenic K-ras results in tumour formation in the oral cavity. Cancer Res. 2004;64:5054–5058. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tuveson DA, Shaw AT, Willis NA, et al. Endogenous oncogenic K-ras(G12D) stimulates proliferation and widespread neoplastic and developmental defects. Cancer Cell. 2004;5:375–387. doi: 10.1016/s1535-6108(04)00085-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Braun BS, Tuveson DA, Kong N, et al. Somatic activation of oncogenic Kras in hematopoietic cells initiates a rapidly fatal myeloproliferative disorder. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:597–602. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307203101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chan IT, Kutok JL, Williams IR, et al. Conditional expression of oncogenic K-ras from its endogenous promoter induces a myeloproliferative disease. J Clin Invest. 2004;113:528–538. doi: 10.1172/JCI20476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Izeradjene K, Combs C, Best M, et al. Kras(G12D) and Smad4/Dpc4 haploinsufficiency cooperate to induce mucinous cystic neoplasms and invasive adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Cancer Cell. 2007;11:229–243. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Vincent DF, Yan KP, Treilleux I, et al. Inactivation of TIF1gamma cooperates with Kras to induce cystic tumours of the pancreas. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hameyer D, Loonstra A, Eshkind L, et al. Toxicity of ligand-dependent Cre recombinases and generation of a conditional Cre deleter mouse allowing mosaic recombination in peripheral tissues. Physiol Genomics. 2007;31:32–41. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00019.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Soriano P. Generalized lacZ expression with the ROSA26 Cre reporter strain. Nature Genet. 1999;21:70–71. doi: 10.1038/5007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Braun KM, Niemann C, Jensen UB, et al. Manipulation of stem cell proliferation and lineage commitment: visualisation of label-retaining cells in wholemounts of mouse epidermis. Development. 2003;130:5241–5255. doi: 10.1242/dev.00703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Vojtek AB, Der CJ. Increasing complexity of the Ras signaling pathway. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:19925–19928. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.32.19925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kumamoto H, Ooya K. Immunohistochemical detection of phosphorylated Akt, PI3K, and PTEN in ameloblastic tumours. Oral Dis. 2007;13:461–467. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2006.01321.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Marques YM, de Lima Mde D, de Melo Alves Sde M, Jr, et al. Mdm2, p53, p21 and pAKT protein pathways in benign neoplasms of the salivary gland. Oral Oncology. 2008;44:903–908. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2007.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.van der Velden LA, Manni JJ, Ramaekers FC, et al. Expression of intermediate filament proteins in benign lesions of the oral mucosa. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1999;256:514–519. doi: 10.1007/s004050050202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bloor BK, Seddon SV, Morgan PR. Gene expression of differentiation-specific keratins in oral epithelial dysplasia and squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2001;37:251–261. doi: 10.1016/s1368-8375(00)00094-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ohkura S, Kondoh N, Hada A, et al. Differential expression of the keratin-4, -13, -14, -17 and transglutaminase 3 genes during the development of oral squamous cell carcinoma from leukoplakia. Oral Oncol. 2005;41:607–661. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2005.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yanagawa T, Yoshida H, Yamagata K, et al. Loss of cytokeratin 13 expression in squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue is a possible sign for local recurrence. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2007;26:215–220. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Schaaij-Visser TB, Graveland AP, Gauci S, et al. Differential proteomics identifies protein biomarkers that predict local relapse of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:7666–7767. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Freedberg IM, Tomic-Canic M, Komine M, et al. Keratins and the keratinocyte activation cycle. J Invest Dermatol. 2001;116:633–664. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2001.01327.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hingorani SR, Petricoin EF, Maitra A, et al. Preinvasive and invasive ductal pancreatic cancer and its early detection in the mouse. Cancer Cell. 2003;4:437–450. doi: 10.1016/s1535-6108(03)00309-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Pugliano FA, Piccirillo JF, Zequeira MR, et al. Clinical-severity staging system for oral cavity cancer: five-year survival rates. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;120:38–45. doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(99)70367-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Riely GJ, Marks J, Pao W. KRAS mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2009;6:201–205. doi: 10.1513/pats.200809-107LC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Beaupre DM, Kurzrock R. RAS and leukemia: from basic mechanisms to gene-directed therapy. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:1071–1079. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.3.1071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Reuter CW, Morgan MA, Bergmann L. Targeting the Ras signaling pathway: a rational, mechanism-based treatment for hematologic malignancies? Blood. 2000;96:1655–1669. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Downward J. Targeting RAS signalling pathways in cancer therapy. Nature Rev Cancer. 2003;3:11–22. doi: 10.1038/nrc969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM, et al. Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol. 2004;5:R80. doi: 10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.van de Wiel MA, Kim KI, Vosse SJ, et al. CGHcall: an algorithm for calling aberrations for multiple array CGH tumor profiles. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:892–894. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Venkatraman ES, Olshen AB. A faster circular binary segmentation algorithm for the analysis of array CGH data. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:657–663. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.