Eosinophilic Inflammation in Allergic Asthma

Abstract

Eosinophils are circulating granulocytes involved in pathogenesis of asthma. A cascade of processes directed by Th2 cytokine producing T-cells influence the recruitment of eosinophils into the lungs. Furthermore, multiple elements including interleukin (IL)-5, IL-13, chemoattractants such as eotaxin, Clara cells, and CC chemokine receptor (CCR)3 are already directly involved in recruiting eosinophils to the lung during allergic inflammation. Once recruited, eosinophils participate in the modulation of immune response, induction of airway hyperresponsiveness and remodeling, characteristic features of asthma. Various types of promising treatments for reducing asthmatic response are related to reduction in eosinophil counts both in human and experimental models of pulmonary allergic inflammation, showing that the recruitment of these cells really plays an important role in the pathophysiology of allergic diseases such asthma.

Introduction

Eosinophils are circulating granulocytes produced in the bone marrow along with other white blood cells and travel at relatively low levels in the bloodstream, making up 1–3% of white blood cells. These are the major cell types that can be recruited to sites of immunological or inflammatory responses (Huang et al., 2009; Isobe et al., 2012; Uhm et al., 2012). The effector function of eosinophils is related to their release of toxic granule proteins, reactive oxygen species (ROS), cytokines, and lipid mediators (Liu et al., 2006). Although eosinophils has been traditionally considered as cytotoxic effectors cells, new insights into molecular pathways allowed a better understanding of the immunomodulatory functions of these cells (Rosenberg et al., 2013). More recently, eosinophils have also been demonstrated to participate in host defense against respiratory viruses (Foster et al., 2008). With the capacity of the eosinophils to store preformed cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors available for immediate use, they play multiple roles favoring the initiation and maintenance of immune responses in inflammation, besides maintaining epithelial barrier function, affecting tissue remodeling, and bridging innate and adaptive immunity (Spencer et al., 2009; Shamri et al., 2011). The local accumulation of eosinophils is involved in the pathogenesis of allergic diseases such as asthma (Kato et al., 2006; Isobe et al., 2012; Uhm et al., 2012).

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease in which several inflammatory cells and mediators plays a role (Kikkawa et al., 2012). Allergic asthma is associated with eosinophilic inflammation in the airways (Lu et al., 2010). The proinflammatory mediators derived by eosinophil are major contributors to inflammation in asthma, including airway epithelial cell damage and loss, airway dysfunction of cholinergic nerve receptors, airway hyperresponsiveness, mucus hypersecretion, and airway remodeling, characterized by fibrosis and collagen deposition (Kay, 2005; Watt et al., 2005; Kanda et al., 2009; Walsh, 2010). Currently, the term “eosinophilic asthma” has been used to characterize an asthma phenotype with prevalence of eosinophils in the bronchial airways, and this phenotype can be identified by peripheral eosinophil count (Liang et al., 2012; Molfino, 2012; Spector and Tan, 2012). Figure 1 summarizes the mode of action of eosinophils and its importance to asthma.

Figure 1.

Eosinophil recruitment in asthma. In the reaction of the airway to antigen, Th2 cytokine producing T-cells as well as IL-5 and eotaxin stimulates the release of eosinophils from bone marrow. Elements like CC chemokine receptor (CCR3) also acting on eosinophil recruitment to the lung. When eosinophils reach the airways through the vasculature, they release granule proteins (ECP, EPO, MBP, and EDN) with cytotoxic, immunological, and remodeling-promoting properties in the lungs. ECP, eosinophil cationic protein; EPO, eosinophil peroxidase; MBP, major basic protein; EDN, eosinophil-derived neurotoxin. Adapted from Ghosh et al. (2013).

Although eosinophils are cells studied for decades, many of the mechanisms involved in eosinophilic inflammation and infiltration in tissues are still poorly understood (Akuthota et al., 2011), mainly because eosinophils are likely to have both agonist and antagonist activities on a variety of tissue resident immune cells, such as mast cells (Lee et al., 2010).

Therefore, studies of eosinophils in human and animal models of allergic airway inflammation help us to better understand the importance of these cells in the pathogenesis of asthma.

Molecular Events in Eosinophil Recruitment in Allergic Asthma

Molecular mechanisms are involved in complex cell-signaling pathways in allergic asthma. In this context, the activities of kinases deserves much attention (Pouliot and Olivier, 2009). An important kinase involved in the traffic and recruitment of eosinophils during allergic inflammation is the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), belonging to a family of signaling molecules. These molecules regulates the adhesion, distribution, and morphologic changes of eosinophils, favoring the recruitment of these cells during lung inflammation (Kang et al., 2012). Experimental studies have been shown previously that PI3K inhibition attenuates eosinophil recruitment into airways in models of asthma (Lim et al., 2009; Park et al., 2010).

Rho-kinase is another important molecule involved in eosinophil recruitment in asthma. It has also been shown that these molecules participating in the infiltration of inflammatory cells into the airways in allergic inflammation, probably suppressing chemokine and cytokines, such as eotaxin, IL-5 and IL-13, related to the pathophysiology of asthma, subject that will be discussed further below (Taki et al., 2007; Possa et al., 2012).

Leukotrienes are another important set of molecules currently related to eosinophilic infiltration in asthma. Especially cysteinyl leukotrienes, mediators, and modulators in the pathophysiology of asthma, are related to the survival and recruitment of eosinophils to inflamed tissue (Busse and Kraft, 2005). Furthermore, leukotriene B(4) [LTB(4)] have been related to activation and recruitment of various types of inflammatory cells, among them eosinophils (Ohnishi et al., 2008). The beneficial effects in allergic inflammation and eosinophil infiltration achieved with the use of leukotrienes inhibitors will be discussed below. Anyway, it is important to emphasize here that eosinophilic recruitment into the inflamed airway in asthma is dependent of important molecular and cellular mechanisms.

Eosinophils and Pulmonary Inflammation

Despite the controversy surrounding the true effector function of eosinophils in allergic airway inflammation, several studies have been demonstrating the importance of eosinophils in different pathways in experimental models of asthma. Modulation of immune response, induction of airway hyperresponsiveness and remodeling appear to be the main function of the recruited eosinophils in asthma (Trivedi and Lloyd, 2007).

Immune Response

Asthma is an inflammatory disease in which multiple inflammatory mediators and modulators play function. In asthma, eosinophils are found in increased numbers in the circulation and sputum (Busse and Sedgwick, 1992). Allergen challenge in animal models of allergic inflammation is related to eosinophilia in bone marrow, blood, and lung (Lu et al., 2010). They are cells with multiple functions that interact complexly with other immune cells and their local environment (Akuthota et al., 2011).

With the allergic reaction of the airway to antigen, a cascade of processes directed by Th2 cytokine producing T-cells starts, which results in the attraction of eosinophils to the airway (Busse and Sedgwick, 1992; Wardlaw, 1999). As a consequence of exposure to the antigen, the release of eosinophils from bone marrow is mainly influenced by interleukin (IL)-5 and specific chemoattractants, such as eotaxin (Brightling, 2001). Recent investigation revealed Clara cells, important part of the “immunomodulatory barrier” of the airway epithelium, as the principal source of eotaxin in the lung (Sonar et al., 2012). It is also believed that exposure to the antigen induces trafficking of IL-5-producing T lymphocytes to the bone marrow, further promoting eosinophilopoiesis through IL-5 signaling (Gauvreau et al., 2009). IL-13 is also related to eosinophilia in asthma. This cytokine acts on IL-5 and eotaxin, which in turn selectively stimulate eosinophils. IL-5 is related to eosinophilia throughout the lung, whereas eotaxin regulates the distribution of airways eosinophils (Pope et al., 2001).

However, during episodes of allergic asthma, other elements like CC chemokine receptor (CCR)3 are already directly involved in recruiting inflammatory cells, particularly eosinophils, to the lung (Das et al., 2006). The Clara cells contribute to the infiltration of eotaxin-responsive CCR3+ immune cells and augment the allergic immune response in the lung (Sonar et al., 2012). Thus, IL-5 and IL-13 signaling for Th2 cell function are not necessarily mutually exclusive effectors mechanisms in eosinophil recruitment, but participate together with other pathways to regulate the allergic disease (Mattes and Foster, 2003).

Thus, even in the absence of IL-5, other factors including a cascade of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1, CC chemokines, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) are capable of maintain sufficient eosinophilic infiltration and their effector functions (Kato et al., 2006).

After attraction, locally generated IL-4 and IL-13 promote increased adhesion of the target organ vasculature to the eosinophils, and factors such as IL-5 and GM-CSF promote the local survival of eosinophils for long periods (Brightling, 2001). Even factors expressed by airway epithelial cells, including nerve growth factor and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), promote survival of tissue eosinophils during allergic airway inflammation (Hahn et al., 2006).

Eosinophils regulate the immune response through direct effects on T-cell activities (Jacobsen et al., 2012). Both Th1 and Th2 cytokine generation by CD4(+) T-cells are also influenced by eosinophils (Liu et al., 2006; Esnault et al., 2012). In brief, eosinophils regulate the allergen-dependent Th2 pulmonary immune responses mediated by dendritic cells and T lymphocytes, as well as suppress Th1 responses (Jacobsen et al., 2011). And the eosinophils only release their granule proteins with cytotoxic, immunological, and remodeling-promoting properties when they reach the target organ, in this case the lungs, showing that these cells have basically local effects on inflammation (Malm-Erjefält et al., 2005).

When activated, eosinophils release leukotrienes (products of oxidative metabolism) and other substances such as growth factors and metalloproteinases involved in airway remodeling. The leukotrienes liberated from mast cells and eosinophils are also potent bronchoconstrictors and perpetuate the migration of eosinophils to the airways (Vignola et al., 2000; Hendeles et al., 2004; Lemanske and Busse, 2010).

Neurokinins such as Substance P (SP) and Neurokinin A (NKA) are small neuropeptides that also plays a significant role in priming eosinophils in allergic inflammation (Numao and Agrawal, 1992; Tibério et al., 1997). It has been shown that neurokinins influence eosinophil chemotaxis (Weinstock et al., 1988; Sagara et al., 1993). Furthermore, Tibério et al. (2003) demonstrated that both SP and NKA contribute to eosinophil lung recruitment in distal airways and in alveolar wall, and these findings suggest that neurokinins may contribute to the development of eosinophilic inflammation in both allergic asthma and hypersensitivity pneumonitis. These data show that modulation by neurogenic response is also very important for the recruitment of eosinophils.

Even stress may amplify the eosinophilic infiltration in both airways and lung parenchyma among animals with allergic inflammation via immune response, demonstrating that these cells probably contribute to asthmatic response related to stress (Leick et al., 2012; Marques et al., 2012). It is well known that some modulators of the stress response have different effects on eosinophil recruitment (Nittoh et al., 1998; Machida et al., 2005), but is important to note that the complexity of these interactions still needs better clarifying.

Thereafter, a series of events contribute to the arrival of eosinophils in the airways, promoting obstruction, injury, and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (Busse and Sedgwick, 1992; Wardlaw, 1999).

Airway Hyperresponsiveness

The association between airway hyperresponsiveness and inflammation is a characteristic feature of asthma [Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA), 2011]. And airway hyperresponsiveness is a well-established consequence of eosinophil infiltration (Kay, 2005; Watt et al., 2005; Kanda et al., 2009; Kim and Lee, 2009; Walsh, 2010). There is evidence that eosinophils are involved in the bronchial hyperresponsiveness mediated by T-cell (Ohtomo et al., 2010). Iwashita et al. (2006) showed in a murine model of airway hyperresponsiveness that eosinophil chemotactic factor by T lymphocytes (ECF-L) expression was observed soon after allergen exposure but before the onset of airway inflammation, indicating that ECF-L is a selectively expressed protein in the airway hyperresponsiveness and may play a critical role in allergic inflammation.

The participation of IL-5 in stimulating eosinophils to induce airway hyperresponsiveness is clear, once depletion of eosinophils with antibody to IL-5 leads to blockage of hyperresponsiveness (Kraneveld et al., 1997; Adamko et al., 1999; Leckie et al., 2000). Furthermore, the direct effect of eosinophils in airway hyperresponsiveness has already been previously demonstrated (Gundel et al., 1991; Kanda et al., 2009). In ovalbumin (OVA)-sensitized guinea pigs (GP), the treatment with antibody to eosinophil major basic protein prevented hyperresponsiveness. It seems like eosinophil major basic protein leads to inhibition of neuronal M2 muscarinic receptor function on parasympathetic nerves in the lungs, causing airway hyperresponsiveness (Evans et al., 1997).

Assuming that total eosinophil counts reflect asthmatic activity and are useful for early detection of exacerbations, Schwartz et al. (2012) demonstrated that there is a strong association between eosinophil count in peripheral blood and airway hyperresponsiveness. Clinically, the quantity of eosinophils in the airways and sputum is directly related to the degree of airway hyperresponsiveness (Gibson et al., 2000; Obase et al., 2001).

Remodeling

Airway remodeling is the cellular and structural changes in the airways, mainly resulting from repair processes in response to persistent inflammation, and that contribute to irreversibility of lung functions observed in asthma patients, including airway dysfunction and clinical symptoms observed in allergic asthma (Vignola et al., 2000, 2003; Phipps et al., 2004; Fattouh and Jordana, 2008). Among structural changes can be noted subepithelial fibrosis, smooth muscle hypertrophy/hyperplasia, epithelial cell mucus metaplasia, and increased angiogenesis (Aceves and Broide, 2008).

Eosinophils seem to contribute to airway remodeling in several ways, including through release of eosinophil-derived mediators such as transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, secretion of cationic proteins, and cytokines, as well as through interactions with mast cell and epithelial cells. Many of these factors can directly activate epithelium and mesenchymal cells, deeply related to the development of airway remodeling (Kariyawasam and Robinson, 2007; Aceves and Broide, 2008; Venge, 2010). Eosinophil-derived cytokines are in the modulation of Th2 responses that trigger macrophage production of TGF-β₁, which serves as a stimulus for extracellular matrix production (Fanta et al., 1999; Holgate, 2001).

In addition, recent data demonstrated that eosinophils can also contribute to airway remodeling during asthma by enhancing airway smooth muscle (ASM) cell proliferation. Halwani et al. (2013) verified that preventing eosinophil contact with ASM cells using specific antibodies or blocking cysteinyl leukotrienes derived from eosinophils was associated with inhibition of ASM proliferation. Moreover, ASM-synthesized cytokines seem to direct the eosinophil differentiation and maturation from progenitor cells, which can promote perpetuation of eosinophilic inflammation and consequently the tissue remodeling in asthma (Fanat et al., 2009).

Eosinophils in Lung Parenchyma

The involvement of the lung parenchyma in the pathophysiology of asthma is already well-established. Recently, it has been recognized that these distal lung alterations can corroborate global pulmonary alterations, enhancing asthma symptoms (Dolhnikoff et al., 1999; Rocco et al., 2001; Mauad et al., 2004; Xisto et al., 2005; Lancas et al., 2006).

In this context, several authors have shown that eosinophilic inflammation were present in the peripheral lung parenchyma of asthmatic patients and in experimental animal models of chronic pulmonary inflammation (Mauad et al., 2004; Xisto et al., 2005; Lancas et al., 2006; Angeli et al., 2008; Araujo et al., 2008; Nakashima et al., 2008; Starling et al., 2009). Thus, it is important to note that not only the airways receive influence of eosinophil recruitment in asthma, but that it also occurs in the lung parenchyma.

Relationship between Experimental Treatments for Chronic Pulmonary Allergic Inflammation and Eosinophils

Various types of promising treatments for reducing asthmatic response are related to reduction in eosinophil counts both in human and experimental models of pulmonary allergic inflammation, showing that these cells really play an important role in the pathophysiology of asthma.

Guinea pigs chronically exposed to OVA present an inflammatory response predominantly eosinophilic, showing a significant increase in eosinophil amount in airways, pulmonary parenchyma, and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), constituting an interesting experimental model to evaluate the participation of eosinophils in allergic inflammation (Tibério et al., 1997; Leick-Maldonado et al., 2004; Prado et al., 2005a,b; Lancas et al., 2006; Angeli et al., 2008; Nakashima et al., 2008; Ruiz-Schütz et al., 2009; Leick et al., 2012; Marques et al., 2012; Possa et al., 2012).

Anti-leukotrienes

Cysteinyl leukotrienes are proinflammatory mediators with many pulmonary actions, including human ASM contraction, chemotaxis, mucous secretion, smooth muscle proliferation, and increase in vascular permeability (Drazen, 1998; Drazen et al., 1999; Holgate and Sampson, 2000; O’Byrne, 2000). In vivo and in vitro influences of leukotrienes in chemotaxis of eosinophils have been previously shown. The treatment with montelukast, an anti-leukotriene drug, was able to reduce eosinophils, with effects similar to dexamethasone treatment, in an experimental model of pulmonary allergic inflammation in GP. The findings were correlated to attenuation of airway response (Leick-Maldonado et al., 2004).

Blain and Sirois (2000) showed in sensitized mice that there was a dose-dependent reduction in eosinophils in BAL by both dexamethasone and cysteinyl leukotriene-receptor antagonist. Muraki et al. (2011) also used cysteinyl leukotrienes receptor antagonists in OVA-sensitized GP and have found significant suppression of eosinophil proliferation into BAL fluid and airways walls (Muraki et al., 2011). Foster and Chan (1991) showed, in sensitized GP, that the increase in eosinophil influx into airway submucosa was attenuated by using a leukotriene-receptor antagonist. Henderson et al. (2002) observed that montelukast treatment resulted in a reduction of eosinophil infiltration in lung interstitium of mice with chronic inflammation induced by OVA exposure.

Factors driving eosinophil influx induced by leukotrienes may include IL-5 altered eosinophilopoiesis and release from the bone marrow, reduced priming of eosinophils, altering the expression of adhesion molecules, and reduced eosinophil apoptosis (Busse, 2001).

An in vitro study with montelukast showed that this antagonist has inhibitory effects on epithelial cell cytokine secretion, including secretion of IL-6 and IL-8, as well as on eosinophil survival, suggesting the mechanisms by which leukotrienes exert their functions on eosinophils in inflammation (Mullol et al., 2010).

Nitric oxide inhibition

It has already been demonstrated acute Nitric oxide (NO) inhibition, but not chronic treatment, by N^ω-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME) is associated with reduction of eosinophils in the airway wall and lung parenchyma of OVA-exposed GP with chronic pulmonary allergic inflammation, showing that NO plays an important role in inflammatory cell recruitment (Prado et al., 2005a,b; Angeli et al., 2008). The acute effects of NO inhibitors on inflammatory cell recruitment have also been observed by other authors (Feder et al., 1997; Schuiling et al., 1998).

Furthermore, it has been shown that l-NAME treatment reduces the number of eosinophils positive for both neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), while the treatment with 1400W, a highly selective iNOS inhibitor, reduce only the iNOS-positive eosinophils, without modifying the number of cells positive for nNOS (Prado et al., 2006). Starling et al. (2009) also found that iNOS-specific inhibition with 1400W reduces the eosinophil density in alveolar septa of allergen-sensitized animals. These results confirm not only the effectiveness of both treatments in exhaled NO reduction, but also that NO production is very important to eosinophilic recruitment.

Although there are several studies showing a role of NO in inflammatory cell recruitment, no effects in eosinophil recruitment are still a matter of controversy. Some authors showed that acute treatment with non-selective inhibitors of NO reduced allergen-induced eosinophilia (Feder et al., 1997; Iijima et al., 2001). However, Eynott et al. (2002) demonstrated that specific inhibition of iNOS reduced only neutrophils. Blease et al. (2000) showed that single l-NAME dose increased peribronchial and BAL fluid eosinophils in a murine model of fungal asthma. Ferreira et al. (1998) demonstrated that chronic l-NAME treatment reduced eosinophils in a model of acute inflammation. A recent study showed that NO induces eosinophil apoptosis in a mechanism mediated via ROS, c-jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), and later mitochondrial permeability transition (mPT) (Ilmarinen-Salo et al., 2012).

These conflicting data between results may be related to the fact that different protocols of antigen sensitization, antigen challenge, type of inhibitors used, and different species have been used. Moreover, the concentration, flux and source of NO influencing eosinophilopoiesis, eosinophilic recruitment, and apoptosis, with either anti- or pro-apoptotic properties may influence the obtained results (Taylor et al., 2003).

Oral tolerance

Oral tolerance is associated with reduction of eosinophil recruitment into distal airways and lung parenchyma, response that is associated with attenuation of airways and lung tissue hyperresponsiveness, as well with reduction in collagen and elastic fiber deposition (Nakashima et al., 2008; Ruiz-Schütz et al., 2009).

Some authors also investigated the eosinophilic response around the airways and speculated that the development of the tolerance process was associated with the disappearance of the Th2 lymphocyte population (Russo et al., 1998, 2001; Chung et al., 2002; Keller et al., 2006). Vaickus et al. (2010) compared the allergic pulmonary inflammation of allergen-sensitized mice submitted to oral tolerance treatment with different types of complex mixture of insect components, and verified that oral tolerance was related to reduction in eosinophil numbers in the BAL fluid and eosinophil specific peroxidase activity in the lung homogenate, demonstrating that oral tolerization is associated with reduction in pulmonary eosinophilia. The decrease in eosinophilopoiesis with oral tolerance demonstrates the idea of the importance of controlling the eosinophilic inflammatory response by immune response modulation (Ruiz-Schütz et al., 2009).

Rho-kinase inhibition

Rho-kinase is an effector protein of the Rho/Rho-kinase pathway that is associated with Ca²⁺ sensitization to promote smooth muscle contraction (Yoshii et al., 1999). Despite Rho-kinase is mainly associated with airway hyperresponsiveness (Hashimoto et al., 2002; Schaafsma et al., 2004, 2008), the infiltration of inflammatory cells into the airways (Taki et al., 2007; Schaafsma et al., 2008) is other important function of this effector protein.

It has been recently demonstrated that the specific Rho-kinase inhibition is associated with reduction in eosinophil recruitment into airways in GP with chronic pulmonary allergic inflammation (Possa et al., 2012).

Several studies have suggested that the RhoA/ROCK system plays a role in eosinophil recruitment and Th1 and Th2 cytokine secretion (Aihara et al., 2003, 2004; Henry et al., 2005). In this regard, Henry et al. (2005) demonstrated that pretreatment with Y-27632 reduced the number of eosinophils recovered from the BAL fluid of OVA-sensitized mice. Taki et al. (2007) demonstrated that another Rho-kinase inhibitor, fasudil, reduced the numbers of eosinophils in BAL fluid, airways and blood vessels. This Rho-kinase inhibitor also diminished the augmented levels of IL-5, IL-13, and eotaxin in BAL fluid, demonstrating that Rho-kinase pathway influences modulators of eosinophilic recruitment.

Zhu et al. (2011) showed that at least two Rho-kinase isoforms, ROCK1 and ROCK2, are associated with eosinophilic recruitment in a model of OVA-challenged mice. Such results lead us to think that both treatment with inhibitors of Rho-kinase as with other drugs for suppressing eosinophilic inflammation and consequently its deleterious effects, would be very beneficial in the treatment of asthma.

Table 1 summarizes the several possible ways of eosinophil recruitment in asthma, with some important references.

Table 1.

Mechanisms of eosinophil recruitment in asthma.

Mechanisms related to eosinophil infiltration	Reference
IL-5, Il-13, and eotaxin	Brightling (2001), Pope et al. (2001), Gauvreau et al. (2009)
CCR3	Mattes and Foster (2003), Das et al. (2006), Sonar et al. (2012)
Neurokinins	Weinstock et al. (1988), Numao and Agrawal (1992), Sagara et al. (1993), Tibério et al. (1997)
Stress	Nittoh et al. (1998), Machida et al. (2005), Leick et al. (2012), Marques et al. (2012)
Cysteinyl leukotrienes	Foster and Chan (1991), Blain and Sirois (2000), Leick-Maldonado et al. (2004), Muraki et al. (2011)
Nitric oxide	Feder et al. (1997), Ferreira et al. (1998), Iijima et al. (2001), Prado et al. (2006), Starling et al. (2009), Ilmarinen-Salo et al. (2012)
Oral tolerance	Russo et al. (1998, 2001), Chung et al. (2002), Keller et al. (2006), Nakashima et al. (2008), Ruiz-Schütz et al. (2009), Vaickus et al. (2010)
Rho-kinase	Aihara et al. (2003, 2004), Henry et al. (2005), Taki et al. (2007), Zhu et al. (2011), Possa et al. (2012)

There are still controversies about if eliminating eosinophils is a risk-free therapeutic strategy. Since eosinophils contribute to defense against respiratory viruses, the elimination of these cells may potentially increase the risk for viral infections, which may predispose to the development of acute exacerbations of asthma, an outcome that would have significant clinical implications (Foster et al., 2008).

Conclusion

Increasingly consistent evidence suggests that eosinophils participate in a wide variety of functions in allergic lung inflammation. In this context, it is important to consider this as a potential target cell for the treatment of asthma. However, given the importance of eosinophils in pathogenesis of asthma but also in lung defense mechanisms, one must consider that the best way to treat asthma should include not its complete elimination, but the partial control of eosinophilic response.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.