Abstract
A biphasic blood culture bottle (BiPB: GIBCO Laboratories, North Andover, Mass.) with an architectural design that physically separates the agar slant from the broth was compared with a conventional vented monophasic bottle (MPB-A) for use in the routine culture of blood. Both bottles contained tryptic soy broth. Tryptic soy agar was used for the BiPB slant. A third unvented bottle (MPB-N) with Columbia broth was included as part of the blood culture set. Of 3,537 sets collected, 444 were positive; 57 of these 444 sets were positive by virtue of an exclusively positive anaerobic bottle. Both BiPB and MPB-A were positive in 235 of the remaining 387 positive sets. A total of 521 isolates was recovered during the study. Of these isolates, 252 were recovered in both the BiPB and the MPB-A from the same set; 105 isolates grew in the BIPB but not in MPB-A, 95 isolates grew only in the MPB-A but not in BiPB, and 69 grew exclusively in the MPB-N. The BiPB allowed more rapid recovery of Candida spp., J-K diphtheroids, Pseudomonas spp. Making BiPB subcultures was easy enough to permit both early and daily subculture, which provided isolated colonies sooner than could be done by using the MPB-A. Isolated colonies and, therefore, identification and susceptibility results were available at least 1 day earlier for the BiPB isolates in approximately 50% of instances when both the BiPB and the MPB-A were positive. Staphylococcus epidermidis and streptococci were recovered more frequently in the BiPB, while gram-positive anaerobes were detected at a significantly (P less than 0.025) more frequent rate in the MPB-A than in the BiPB. Either bottle, however, should be used in conjunction with an anaerobic bottle for optimal recovery of anaerobic bacteria.
Full text
PDF
Images in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bryan L. E. Comparison of a slide blood culture system with a supplemented peptone broth culture method. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Oct;14(4):389–392. doi: 10.1128/jcm.14.4.389-392.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harkness J. L., Hall M., Ilstrup D. M., Washington J. A., 2nd Effects of atmosphere of incubation and of routine subcultures on detection of bacteremia in vacuum blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Oct;2(4):296–299. doi: 10.1128/jcm.2.4.296-299.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Henry N. K., Grewell C. M., McLimans C. A., Washington J. A., 2nd Comparison of the Roche Septi-Chek blood culture bottle with a brain heart infusion biphasic medium bottle and with a tryptic soy broth bottle. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Mar;19(3):315–317. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.3.315-317.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Henry N. K., Washington J. A., 2nd Initial detection of bacteremia by subculture of unvented tryptic soy broth blood culture bottles. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1984 Apr;2(2):107–111. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(84)90005-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pfaller M. A., Sibley T. K., Westfall L. M., Hoppe-Bauer J. E., Keating M. A., Murray P. R. Clinical laboratory comparison of a slide blood culture system with a conventional broth system. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Sep;16(3):525–530. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.3.525-530.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Todd J. K., Roe M. H. Rapid detection of bacteremia by an early subculture technic. Am J Clin Pathol. 1975 Nov;64(5):694–699. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/64.5.694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weinstein M. P., Reller L. B., Mirrett S., Wang W. L., Alcid D. V. Clinical comparison of an agar slide blood culture bottle with tryptic soy broth and a conventional blood culture bottle with supplemented peptone broth. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 May;21(5):815–818. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.5.815-818.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weinstein M. P., Reller L. B., Mirrett S., Wang W. L., Alcid D. V. Controlled evaluation of Trypticase soy broth in agar slide and conventional blood culture systems. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Apr;21(4):626–629. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.4.626-629.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]