Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 27.
Published in final edited form as: Transplantation. 2013 Apr 27;95(8):1008–1014. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182855544

Table 4.

Effect of DGF on graft loss and mortality at 1 and 5 years using a conventional linear probability model regression versus an instrumental variable analysis

Dependent
variable
One year graft loss
(N=69,922)
Five year graft loss
(N=41,138)
One year mortality
(N=72,879)
Five year mortality
(N=47,604)
Model LPM IVM LPM IVM LPM IVM LPM IVM
Coefficient on DGF 0.10072 0.13546 0.12475 0.16183 0.03312 0.07112 0.05986 0.11032
(standard error) (0.00375) (0.02224) (0.00465) (0.03805) (0.00233) (0.01493) (0.00466) (0.03529)
p-value <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.002

LPM = Linear Probability Model; IVM = Instrumental Variables Model

All standard errors are heteroskedasticity robust and clustered by region

Multiply coefficient by 100 to derive the probability of dependent variable on outcome.

All models control for the following covariates: transplant year, organ procurement organization, age, sex, educational level, race, insurance status, diabetes type, days on waiting list, peak panel reactive antibodies, and number of HLA mismatches at transplant, donor age, donor sex, donor race, donor diabetes, donor hypertension, whether the kidney was pumped, terminal serum creatinine, donor cause of death, and whether the kidney was a donation after circulatory determination of death.