Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2013 Mar 28;69(Pt 4):m232–m233. doi: 10.1107/S1600536813007733

Poly[diaqua­[μ6-4,4′-(1,4-phenyl­ene)bis­(2,6-dimethyl­pyridine-3,5-dicarboxyl­ato)]dilead(II)]

Yi Zhu a, Ming-Xing Zhang a, Shan-Shan Yang a, Feng Xiao a, Xiao-Ping Zhang a, Yuan-Yuan Gao a, Bing-Jie Li a, Kun-Lin Huang a,*
PMCID: PMC3629504  PMID: 23634022

Abstract

The asymmetric unit of the title Pb-based coordination polymer, [Pb2(C24H16N2O8)(H2O)2]n, consists of one PbII cation, half of a 4,4′-(1,4-phenyl­ene)bis­(2,6-dimethyl­pyridine-3,5-di­carb­oxyl­ate (L 4−) ligand and one coordinating water mol­ecule. The centers of the benzene ring of the ligand and the four-membered Pb/O/Pb/O ring are located on centers of inversion. The PbII ion is coordinated in form of a distorted polyhedron by seven O atoms from four separate L 4− ligands and by one water O atom. The PbO7 polyhedra share O atoms, forming infinite zigzag [PbO4(H2O)]n chains along [100] that are bridged by L 4− ligands, forming a two-dimensional coordination network parallel to (001). O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds involving the water mol­ecule are observed.

Related literature  

For background to metal-organic frameworks, see: Long & Yaghi (2009); Zhao et al. (2003). For related structures, see: Liu et al. (2002); O’Keeffe et al. (2008); Zhang et al. (2011). For lead complexes, see: Harrowfield et al. (2004); Yang et al. (2007). For typical Pb—O distances, see: Chen et al. (2012); Wei et al. (2005). For the photoluminescent mechanism of ligand–metal charge transfer, see: Hu et al. (2010); Zhang et al. (2012). graphic file with name e-69-0m232-scheme1.jpg

Experimental  

Crystal data  

  • [Pb2(C24H16N2O8)(H2O)2]

  • M r = 910.80

  • Triclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 7.2182 (12) Å

  • b = 9.0635 (14) Å

  • c = 9.9589 (15) Å

  • α = 79.202 (2)°

  • β = 71.683 (2)°

  • γ = 85.494 (3)°

  • V = 607.43 (17) Å3

  • Z = 1

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 13.90 mm−1

  • T = 298 K

  • 0.25 × 0.23 × 0.23 mm

Data collection  

  • Bruker SMART APEXII CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003) T min = 0.129, T max = 0.142

  • 3168 measured reflections

  • 2119 independent reflections

  • 1932 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.015

Refinement  

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.022

  • wR(F 2) = 0.055

  • S = 1.01

  • 2119 reflections

  • 174 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 1.15 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −1.16 e Å−3

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2010); cell refinement: SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2008); data reduction: SAINT-Plus; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: PLATON (Spek, 2009).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813007733/im2422sup1.cif

e-69-0m232-sup1.cif (21.2KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813007733/im2422Isup2.hkl

e-69-0m232-Isup2.hkl (104.2KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O5—H2⋯O4i 0.85 2.04 2.834 (6) 155
O5—H1⋯O3ii 0.85 2.05 2.879 (5) 165

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Science and Technology Projects of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission (grant No. KJ120632) and Chongqing Normal University Scientific Research Foundation Project (grant No. 2011XLS30).

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

In recent years, the chemistry of novel metal-organic hybrid coordination polymers has been the subject of intensive research, due to their interesting molecular structures and their potential as a new class of solid-state materials applied in catalysis, molecular recognition, gas storage, drug delivery, and so on (Liu et al., 2002; O'Keeffe et al., 2008). Generally speaking, the diversity of potential applications in the framework structures of such materials greatly depends on the selection of the metal centers and organic spacers. Recently, carboxylate groups are frequently exploited in the design, syntheses, and crystallization of coordination frameworks, because they exhibit diverse coordination modes, which can enhance the robustness of the architectures. Furthermore, the flexibility of carboxylate groups is always efficient to form fascinating structures. In this paper, we choose a new flexible and multidentate carboxylate ligand, 4,4'-(1,4-phenylene)bis(2,6-dimethylpyridine-3,5-dicarboxylic acid) (H4L).

Up to date, research on coordination polymers has focused on transition metal ions as coordination centers, while less concentration has been given to heavy p-block metal ion, e.g. lead(II). In contrast to transiton metal ions, lead(II), with its large radius, flexible coordination environment, and variable stereochemical activity, provides unique opportunities for the formation of unusual structures with interesting properties (Harrowfield et al.., 2004; Yang et al.., 2007). In addition, the intrinsic features of lead(II), the presence of a 6 s2 outer electron configuration, inspire chemists extensive interest in coordination chemistry, photophysics, and photochemistry. Herein, we report a new photoluminescent complex [Pb(L)(H2O)]n(1) from the flexible 4,4'-(1,4-phenylene)bis(2,6-dimethylpyridine-3,5- dicarboxylic acid) (H4L) and lead salt.

X-ray diffraction analyses reveal that each asymmetric unit of 1 contains half deprotonated L4- ligand, one H2O molecule and one crystallographically independent PbII center(Fig 1). Pb1 center is coordinated with seven O atoms: six (O1#1, O1#2, O2#2,O2#3, O3, O4) from four H4L ligands and one (O5) from the H2O molecule. Of particular interest is the weak coordinative bond that exists between Pb1 and O2#3. Pb1,O1#1, O1#2, O2#2,O2#3, O3, O4, O5 furnish a polyhydral coordination environment (PbO7) with the Pb—O bond lengths are in agreement with those reported in other Pb(II) complexes of O-chelating ligands (Wei et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2012).

As shown in Fig.1, each H4L ligand connects six crystallographically equivalent Pb atoms. The carboxylato group with O1 and O2 coordinates three lead atoms producing two Pb2O2 rings that share one common lead atom. The other carboxylate moiety with donor atoms O3 and O4 coordinates one lead atom in a chelating mode. Notably, the resulting PbO7 polyhedra share the O1#4, O1#5, O2#2, O2#3 atoms to form infinite zigzag chains composed of [PbO4(H2O)]n in which adjacent Pb atoms are coplanar and Pb···Pb distances are 4.077 Å and 4.161 Å respectively (Fig. 2). Another interesting structural feature of complex 1 is that the zigzag [PbO4(H2O)]n chains are bridged by H4L ligands to form a two-dimensional (2-D) coordination network (Fig. 3).

The photoluminescence spectrum of compound 1 was measured in the solid state at room temperature, as shown in Fig. 4. At room temperature the photoluminescent emission maximum of free H4L was observed at 426 nm (upon λEx, max = 208 nm). For compound 1, excitation at 380 nm leads to strong photoluminescence with an emission maximum at λ = 465 nm. The emission peak of complex 1 is red-shifted by about 40 nm compared to that of the pure H4L ligand, which can be assigned to the ligand-metal charge transfer (LMCT) (Hu et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2012).

Experimental

A mixture of Pb(NO3)2 × 6 H2O (66 mg), H4L (40 mg) and DMF (6 ml) was sealed in a 25 ml Teflon-lined stainless steel reactor. The mixture was heated to 373 K for 3 days and then cooled to room temperature. The crystal samples were washed with methanol to yield 18 mg of compound 1.

Refinement

Methyl H atoms were constrained to an ideal geometry (C—H = 0.96 Å), with Uiso(H) =1.5Ueq(C), but were allowed to rotate freely. Other H atoms attached to C atoms were refined using a riding model [C—H = 0.93 Å (CH) and Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq (parent atom)].

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Part of crystal structure of the L4- ligand and PbII centres in 1. All H atoms have been omitted for clarity. [symmetry code: (#1) -x, y+1, -z+1; (#2) x, y - 1,z; (#3) -x + 1, -y + 1, -z + 1; (#4) x + 1, y-1, z; (#5) -x + 1, -y + 1, -z + 1.]

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Sectional crystal structure of zigzag chain [PbO4(H2O)]n. Pb, green; O, red; H, white

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

View along c axis of two-dimensional coordination polymer from Pb ions and L4- ligands. PbO7, polyhedron: green; O: red; N: blue; C: grey.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Photoluminescent spectra of 1 (λem at 465 nm, upon λex at 380 nm). I = relative intensity, em = emission, and ex = excitation.

Crystal data

[Pb2(C24H16N2O8)(H2O)2] Z = 1
Mr = 910.80 F(000) = 422
Triclinic, P1 Dx = 2.490 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1 Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 7.2182 (12) Å Cell parameters from 1580 reflections
b = 9.0635 (14) Å θ = 2.7–23.1°
c = 9.9589 (15) Å µ = 13.90 mm1
α = 79.202 (2)° T = 298 K
β = 71.683 (2)° Block, colorless
γ = 85.494 (3)° 0.25 × 0.23 × 0.23 mm
V = 607.43 (17) Å3

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEXII CCD diffractometer 2119 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 1932 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator Rint = 0.015
phi and ω scans θmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.2°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003) h = −8→8
Tmin = 0.129, Tmax = 0.142 k = −10→10
3168 measured reflections l = −10→11

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.022 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.055 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.01 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0347P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2119 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
174 parameters Δρmax = 1.15 e Å3
0 restraints Δρmin = −1.16 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Pb1 0.24557 (3) 0.11141 (2) 0.47717 (2) 0.02892 (9)
O1 0.0452 (5) 0.9117 (4) 0.6086 (4) 0.0281 (8)
O2 0.3224 (5) 0.8538 (4) 0.6568 (5) 0.0365 (9)
O3 0.2253 (5) 0.1995 (4) 0.7194 (4) 0.0343 (9)
O4 −0.0248 (6) 0.2448 (5) 0.6332 (5) 0.0382 (10)
O5 0.3782 (6) −0.0957 (5) 0.3132 (5) 0.0441 (11)
H1 0.4881 −0.1412 0.3019 0.066*
H2 0.2924 −0.1629 0.3379 0.066*
N1 −0.2153 (6) 0.5547 (5) 0.9379 (5) 0.0275 (10)
C1 −0.1131 (7) 0.6798 (6) 0.8704 (6) 0.0245 (11)
C2 0.0591 (7) 0.6774 (5) 0.7553 (5) 0.0220 (11)
C3 0.1282 (7) 0.5404 (6) 0.7125 (5) 0.0213 (10)
C4 0.0148 (7) 0.4140 (6) 0.7758 (5) 0.0233 (11)
C5 −0.1579 (7) 0.4255 (6) 0.8888 (6) 0.0271 (12)
C6 −0.1922 (8) 0.8214 (6) 0.9291 (6) 0.0341 (13)
H6A −0.2907 0.8662 0.8872 0.051*
H6B −0.0882 0.8906 0.9060 0.051*
H6C −0.2481 0.7975 1.0315 0.051*
C7 0.1542 (7) 0.8222 (6) 0.6705 (6) 0.0242 (11)
C8 0.0752 (7) 0.2736 (6) 0.7103 (6) 0.0243 (11)
C9 −0.2867 (8) 0.2946 (7) 0.9630 (7) 0.0379 (14)
H9A −0.2869 0.2692 1.0611 0.057*
H9B −0.2388 0.2102 0.9154 0.057*
H9C −0.4172 0.3203 0.9603 0.057*
C10 0.3206 (7) 0.5253 (5) 0.5999 (5) 0.0192 (10)
C11 0.3313 (7) 0.5098 (6) 0.4608 (5) 0.0249 (11)
H11 0.2177 0.5160 0.4347 0.030*
C12 0.5090 (7) 0.4854 (6) 0.3615 (5) 0.0241 (11)
H12 0.5146 0.4761 0.2689 0.029*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Pb1 0.02297 (13) 0.02526 (13) 0.03649 (14) −0.00185 (8) −0.00454 (9) −0.00765 (9)
O1 0.0269 (19) 0.0225 (19) 0.037 (2) −0.0014 (15) −0.0143 (17) −0.0010 (16)
O2 0.024 (2) 0.029 (2) 0.054 (3) −0.0052 (16) −0.0106 (19) −0.0020 (18)
O3 0.034 (2) 0.029 (2) 0.044 (2) 0.0113 (17) −0.0165 (19) −0.0119 (18)
O4 0.030 (2) 0.036 (2) 0.056 (3) 0.0017 (17) −0.017 (2) −0.022 (2)
O5 0.029 (2) 0.048 (3) 0.059 (3) 0.0011 (19) −0.013 (2) −0.021 (2)
N1 0.021 (2) 0.031 (3) 0.026 (2) 0.0005 (19) 0.0000 (19) −0.008 (2)
C1 0.020 (3) 0.027 (3) 0.026 (3) 0.002 (2) −0.006 (2) −0.008 (2)
C2 0.021 (2) 0.018 (3) 0.027 (3) 0.002 (2) −0.009 (2) −0.004 (2)
C3 0.020 (2) 0.026 (3) 0.018 (2) 0.002 (2) −0.006 (2) −0.005 (2)
C4 0.023 (3) 0.022 (3) 0.024 (3) 0.001 (2) −0.007 (2) −0.005 (2)
C5 0.021 (3) 0.033 (3) 0.027 (3) −0.001 (2) −0.009 (2) −0.002 (2)
C6 0.031 (3) 0.029 (3) 0.037 (3) 0.006 (2) 0.000 (3) −0.014 (2)
C7 0.024 (3) 0.019 (3) 0.027 (3) 0.001 (2) −0.001 (2) −0.007 (2)
C8 0.020 (3) 0.021 (3) 0.027 (3) 0.002 (2) −0.002 (2) −0.003 (2)
C9 0.030 (3) 0.034 (3) 0.041 (4) −0.006 (3) 0.001 (3) −0.003 (3)
C10 0.018 (2) 0.017 (2) 0.020 (2) 0.0026 (19) −0.003 (2) −0.0028 (19)
C11 0.020 (2) 0.028 (3) 0.029 (3) 0.001 (2) −0.011 (2) −0.005 (2)
C12 0.023 (3) 0.030 (3) 0.019 (3) 0.001 (2) −0.005 (2) −0.004 (2)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

Pb1—O1i 2.327 (4) C2—C3 1.393 (7)
Pb1—O4 2.472 (4) C2—C7 1.507 (7)
Pb1—O1ii 2.538 (3) C3—C4 1.390 (7)
Pb1—O3 2.638 (4) C3—C10 1.501 (7)
Pb1—O5 2.644 (4) C4—C5 1.405 (7)
O3—C8 1.248 (6) C5—C9 1.494 (8)
O4—C8 1.277 (7) C6—H6A 0.9600
C8—C4 1.510 (7) C6—H6B 0.9600
O1—C7 1.294 (6) C6—H6C 0.9600
O1—Pb1iii 2.327 (4) C9—H9A 0.9600
O1—Pb1ii 2.538 (3) C9—H9B 0.9600
N1—C5 1.338 (7) C9—H9C 0.9600
N1—C1 1.348 (7) C10—C12iv 1.391 (7)
O2—C7 1.230 (6) C10—C11 1.395 (7)
O5—H1 0.8500 C11—C12 1.383 (7)
O5—H2 0.8500 C11—H11 0.9300
C1—C2 1.403 (7) C12—C10iv 1.391 (7)
C1—C6 1.507 (7) C12—H12 0.9300
O1i—Pb1—O4 79.28 (13) C3—C4—C5 119.1 (5)
O1i—Pb1—O1ii 66.21 (14) C3—C4—C8 117.7 (4)
O4—Pb1—O1ii 75.30 (12) C5—C4—C8 122.9 (5)
O1i—Pb1—O3 89.30 (13) N1—C5—C4 121.7 (5)
O4—Pb1—O3 51.16 (12) N1—C5—C9 116.0 (5)
O1ii—Pb1—O3 124.84 (11) C4—C5—C9 122.3 (5)
O1i—Pb1—O5 78.92 (13) C1—C6—H6A 109.5
O4—Pb1—O5 151.48 (13) C1—C6—H6B 109.5
O1ii—Pb1—O5 79.19 (12) H6A—C6—H6B 109.5
O3—Pb1—O5 146.08 (13) C1—C6—H6C 109.5
C8—O3—Pb1 87.8 (3) H6A—C6—H6C 109.5
C8—O4—Pb1 94.7 (3) H6B—C6—H6C 109.5
O3—C8—O4 122.3 (5) O2—C7—O1 121.6 (5)
O3—C8—C4 121.6 (5) O2—C7—C2 124.0 (5)
O4—C8—C4 115.8 (4) O1—C7—C2 114.4 (4)
C7—O1—Pb1iii 104.5 (3) C5—C9—H9A 109.5
C7—O1—Pb1ii 136.9 (3) C5—C9—H9B 109.5
Pb1iii—O1—Pb1ii 113.79 (14) H9A—C9—H9B 109.5
C5—N1—C1 119.3 (4) C5—C9—H9C 109.5
Pb1—O5—H1 125.1 H9A—C9—H9C 109.5
Pb1—O5—H2 107.8 H9B—C9—H9C 109.5
H1—O5—H2 106.8 C12iv—C10—C11 119.3 (4)
N1—C1—C2 122.0 (5) C12iv—C10—C3 118.9 (4)
N1—C1—C6 115.8 (5) C11—C10—C3 121.6 (4)
C2—C1—C6 122.2 (5) C12—C11—C10 120.7 (5)
C3—C2—C1 118.6 (5) C12—C11—H11 119.7
C3—C2—C7 120.8 (5) C10—C11—H11 119.7
C1—C2—C7 120.2 (4) C11—C12—C10iv 120.0 (5)
C4—C3—C2 118.8 (5) C11—C12—H12 120.0
C4—C3—C10 119.1 (4) C10iv—C12—H12 120.0
C2—C3—C10 122.1 (5)

Symmetry codes: (i) x, y−1, z; (ii) −x, −y+1, −z+1; (iii) x, y+1, z; (iv) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O5—H2···O4v 0.85 2.04 2.834 (6) 155
O5—H1···O3vi 0.85 2.05 2.879 (5) 165

Symmetry codes: (v) −x, −y, −z+1; (vi) −x+1, −y, −z+1.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: IM2422).

References

  1. Bruker (2008). SAINT-Plus. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  2. Bruker (2010). APEX2 Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  3. Chen, X., Zhang, M. X. & Huang, K. L. (2012). Chin. J. Struct. Chem. 31, 1601–1607.
  4. Harrowfield, J. M., Maghaminia, S. & Soudi, A. A. (2004). Inorg. Chem. 43, 1810–1812. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Hu, J. S., Shang, Y. J., Yao, X. Q., Qin, L., Li, Y. Z., Guo, Z. J., Zheng, H. G. & Xue, Z. L. (2010). Cryst. Growth Des. 10, 4135–4142.
  6. Liu, Y. H., Lu, Y. L., Wu, H. C., Wang, J. C. & Lu, K. L. (2002). Inorg. Chem. 41, 2592–2597. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Long, J. R. & Yaghi, O. M. (2009). Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 1213–1214. [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. O’Keeffe, M., Peskov, M. A., Ramsden, S. J. & Yaghi, O. M. (2008). Acc. Chem. Res. 41, 1782–1789. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Sheldrick, G. M. (2003). SADABS University of Göttingen, Germany.
  10. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  11. Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  12. Wei, Y. L., Hou, H. W., Li, L. K., Fan, Y. T. & Zhu, Y. (2005). Cryst. Growth Des. 5, 1405–1413.
  13. Yang, J., Li, G. D., Cao, J. J., Yue, Q., Li, G. H. & Chen, J. S. (2007). Chem. Eur. J. 13, 3248–3261. [DOI] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, M.-X., Chen, X., Huang, K.-L., Zhu, Y. & Yang, S.-S. (2012). Acta Cryst. C68, m90–m93. [DOI] [PubMed]
  15. Zhang, M.-X., Jiao, X.-Y., Chen, X. & Huang, K.-L. (2011). Acta Cryst. C67, m324–m326. [DOI] [PubMed]
  16. Zhao, B., Cheng, P., Dai, Y., Cheng, C., Liao, D. Z., Yan, S. P., Jiang, Z. H. & Wang, G. L. (2003). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 42, 934–936. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813007733/im2422sup1.cif

e-69-0m232-sup1.cif (21.2KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813007733/im2422Isup2.hkl

e-69-0m232-Isup2.hkl (104.2KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES