Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2013 Mar 2;69(Pt 4):o473. doi: 10.1107/S1600536813005394

3-Bromo­chroman-4-one

Mahidansha M Shaikh a, Neil A Koorbanally a,*, Karen Du Toit b, Deresh Ramjugernath c, Johannes Bodenstein b
PMCID: PMC3629513  PMID: 23634031

Abstract

The heterocyclic ring of the title compound, C9H7BrO2, obtained by bromination of 4-chromanone with copper bromide, adopts a half-chair conformation. The supramol­ecular structure is governed by a weak C—H⋯O hydrogen bond. There is also π–π stacking between symmetry-related benzene rings; the centroid–centroid distance is 3.9464 (18), the perpendicular distance between the rings is 3.4703 (11) and the offset is 1.879 Å.

Related literature  

For similar structures, see: Schollmeyer et al. (2005); Piel et al. (2011); Betz et al. (2011). For synthesis involving chromanone inter­mediates, see: Simas et al. (2002); Zhang et al. (2008). For the biological activity of chromanone derivatives, see: Cho et al. (1996); Xu et al. (1998); Shaikh et al. (2012, 2013a ,b ).graphic file with name e-69-0o473-scheme1.jpg

Experimental  

Crystal data  

  • C9H7BrO2

  • M r = 227.06

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 10.0846 (7) Å

  • b = 7.9104 (6) Å

  • c = 10.9330 (8) Å

  • β = 110.164 (2)°

  • V = 818.71 (10) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 4.97 mm−1

  • T = 173 K

  • 0.16 × 0.12 × 0.12 mm

Data collection  

  • Bruker Kappa DUO APEXII diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1997) T min = 0.504, T max = 0.587

  • 5434 measured reflections

  • 1659 independent reflections

  • 1392 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.026

Refinement  

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.025

  • wR(F 2) = 0.061

  • S = 1.05

  • 1659 reflections

  • 109 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.39 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.39 e Å−3

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2006); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2006); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813005394/go2082sup1.cif

e-69-0o473-sup1.cif (14.9KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813005394/go2082Isup2.hkl

e-69-0o473-Isup2.hkl (81.8KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813005394/go2082Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C2—H2A⋯O2i 0.99 2.44 3.311 (3) 146

Symmetry code: (i) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

We thank the University of KwaZulu-Natal, the National Research Foundation (NRF) and the South African Research Chairs initiative of the Department of Science and Technology for financial support and Ms Hong Su for the data collection.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

Many chromanone derivatives are used as versatile intermediates in the synthesis of natural products such as flavanone, isoflavanone and homoisoflavanones (Simas et al., 2002, Zhang et al., 2008). These derivatives possess anticancer and antibiotic properties (Cho et al., 1996.). Chromanone derivatives also possess antiviral activities against HIV and the simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) (Xu et al., 1998). We recently reported the synthesis of several homoisoflavanone analogues from their corresponding chromanone derivatives with antiinflammatory (Shaikh et al., 2012; Shaikh et al., 2013a) and antifungal activities (Shaikh et al., 2013b).

In the title compound, the pyranone moiety is fused with the benzene ring and adopts a half chair conformation. The dihedral angle between the benzene ring and the (C3—C2—O1) of the pyranone moiety is 43.03 (17)° and C2 flips out of the plane of the benzene ring by 0.5734 (31) Å (Fig. 1).

The supramolecular structure is governed by a weak C-H···O hydrogen bond, C2 –H2A···.O2 (-x,1-y,-z) with an H···O distance of 2.44 Å, a C···O distance of 3.311 (3)Å and an angle at H of 146°.

There is also π–π stacking between the two benzene rings across the centre-of-symmetry at (1/2,1/2,0), the centroid to centroid distance is 3.9464 (18)Å, the perpendicular distance between the rings is 3.4703 (11)Å and the offset is 1.879Å.

Experimental

To a mixture of copper bromide (II) (11.351 g, 50.673 mmol) in ethyl acetate, chloroform (20:20 ml) was stirred under inert atmosphere at room temperature. Into this mixture, chroman-4-one (5 g, 33.783 mmol) in chloroform (20 ml) was added and the reaction mixture refluxed vigorously under inert atmosphere at 70 °C for 6 h. Completion of the reaction was monitored by thin layer chromatography. Upon completion, the reaction mixture was cooled, filtered and washed with chloroform (20 ml). The filtrate solution was evaporated under reduced pressure to get the pure title compound with a yield of 86%.

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (p.p.m.): 4.53–4.65 (3H, m, H-2a, H-2 b & H-3), 6.98–7.06 (2H, m, H-6 & H-8), 7.48–7.52 (1H, m, H-7), 7.89 (1H, dd, J = 1.60, 7.92 Hz, H-5).

13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (p.p.m.): 45.43 (C-3), 71.26 (C-2), 117.95 (C-8), 11877 (C-10), 122.33 (C-6), 128.24 (C-7), 136.74 (C-5), 160.65 (C-9), 185.21 (C-4).

Refinement

All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. All hydrogen atoms were placed in idealized positions and refined with geometrical constraints. The structure was refined to a R factor of 0.0251.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The molecular structure of the title compound, with atom labels and anisotropic displacement ellipsoids (drawn at 50% probability level).

Crystal data

C9H7BrO2 F(000) = 448
Mr = 227.06 Dx = 1.842 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -p 2ybc Cell parameters from 5434 reflections
a = 10.0846 (7) Å θ = 2.2–26.4°
b = 7.9104 (6) Å µ = 4.97 mm1
c = 10.9330 (8) Å T = 173 K
β = 110.164 (2)° Block, colourless
V = 818.71 (10) Å3 0.16 × 0.12 × 0.12 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Bruker Kappa DUO APEXII diffractometer 1659 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 1392 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator Rint = 0.026
0.5° φ scans and ω scans θmax = 26.4°, θmin = 2.2°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1997) h = −12→8
Tmin = 0.504, Tmax = 0.587 k = −9→9
5434 measured reflections l = −7→13

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.025 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.061 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.05 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0298P)2 + 0.3551P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1659 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
109 parameters Δρmax = 0.39 e Å3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.39 e Å3

Special details

Experimental. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (p.p.m.): 4.53–4.65 (3H, m, H-2a, H-2b & H-3), 6.98–7.06 (2H, m, H-6 & H-8), 7.48–7.52 (1H, m, H-7), 7.89 (1H, dd, J = 1.60, 7.92 Hz, H-5). 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (p.p.m.): 45.43 (C-3), 71.26 (C-2), 117.95 (C-8), 118.77 (C-10), 122.33 (C-6), 128.24 (C-7), 136.74 (C-5), 160.65 (C-9), 185.21 (C-4).
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Br1 0.22559 (3) 0.04339 (3) 0.04673 (3) 0.03040 (11)
O1 0.33588 (18) 0.3999 (2) 0.20473 (16) 0.0258 (4)
O2 0.00306 (19) 0.3386 (2) −0.13799 (18) 0.0348 (5)
C2 0.2062 (3) 0.3261 (3) 0.2053 (2) 0.0261 (6)
H2A 0.1470 0.4155 0.2238 0.031*
H2B 0.2276 0.2418 0.2764 0.031*
C3 0.1239 (3) 0.2415 (3) 0.0786 (2) 0.0251 (6)
H3 0.0297 0.2053 0.0807 0.030*
C4 0.1031 (3) 0.3566 (3) −0.0374 (2) 0.0242 (5)
C5 0.2106 (3) 0.5942 (3) −0.1218 (3) 0.0274 (6)
H5 0.1348 0.5872 −0.2026 0.033*
C6 0.3170 (3) 0.7098 (3) −0.1066 (3) 0.0330 (7)
H6 0.3148 0.7825 −0.1764 0.040*
C7 0.4279 (3) 0.7196 (3) 0.0121 (3) 0.0339 (7)
H7 0.5018 0.7987 0.0223 0.041*
C8 0.4323 (3) 0.6165 (3) 0.1148 (3) 0.0284 (6)
H8 0.5080 0.6253 0.1955 0.034*
C9 0.3249 (3) 0.4994 (3) 0.0995 (2) 0.0212 (5)
C10 0.2132 (3) 0.4865 (3) −0.0193 (2) 0.0210 (5)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Br1 0.04127 (18) 0.01971 (15) 0.03327 (17) 0.00253 (11) 0.01674 (13) 0.00006 (12)
O1 0.0294 (10) 0.0252 (9) 0.0199 (9) −0.0012 (8) 0.0046 (8) 0.0022 (8)
O2 0.0315 (11) 0.0358 (11) 0.0289 (11) 0.0004 (8) −0.0002 (9) −0.0033 (9)
C2 0.0339 (15) 0.0240 (13) 0.0218 (13) 0.0027 (11) 0.0116 (12) 0.0023 (11)
C3 0.0265 (13) 0.0225 (13) 0.0294 (14) 0.0016 (11) 0.0137 (12) −0.0006 (11)
C4 0.0259 (13) 0.0233 (13) 0.0242 (13) 0.0058 (11) 0.0095 (12) −0.0027 (11)
C5 0.0392 (15) 0.0233 (13) 0.0217 (13) 0.0094 (12) 0.0129 (12) 0.0008 (11)
C6 0.0521 (18) 0.0196 (13) 0.0364 (16) 0.0075 (12) 0.0269 (15) 0.0071 (12)
C7 0.0394 (16) 0.0199 (14) 0.0504 (18) −0.0021 (12) 0.0255 (15) −0.0019 (13)
C8 0.0276 (14) 0.0236 (13) 0.0348 (15) −0.0006 (11) 0.0116 (12) −0.0066 (12)
C9 0.0263 (13) 0.0175 (12) 0.0209 (12) 0.0033 (9) 0.0097 (11) −0.0014 (9)
C10 0.0267 (13) 0.0172 (12) 0.0221 (13) 0.0032 (10) 0.0122 (11) −0.0027 (10)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

Br1—C3 1.969 (2) C5—C6 1.375 (4)
O1—C9 1.367 (3) C5—C10 1.401 (4)
O1—C2 1.434 (3) C5—H5 0.9500
O2—C4 1.218 (3) C6—C7 1.393 (4)
C2—C3 1.505 (3) C6—H6 0.9500
C2—H2A 0.9900 C7—C8 1.376 (4)
C2—H2B 0.9900 C7—H7 0.9500
C3—C4 1.515 (3) C8—C9 1.390 (4)
C3—H3 1.0000 C8—H8 0.9500
C4—C10 1.476 (4) C9—C10 1.399 (4)
C9—O1—C2 115.40 (19) C6—C5—H5 119.7
O1—C2—C3 113.01 (19) C10—C5—H5 119.7
O1—C2—H2A 109.0 C5—C6—C7 119.5 (2)
C3—C2—H2A 109.0 C5—C6—H6 120.2
O1—C2—H2B 109.0 C7—C6—H6 120.2
C3—C2—H2B 109.0 C8—C7—C6 121.1 (3)
H2A—C2—H2B 107.8 C8—C7—H7 119.5
C2—C3—C4 112.1 (2) C6—C7—H7 119.5
C2—C3—Br1 111.18 (17) C7—C8—C9 119.5 (3)
C4—C3—Br1 105.11 (15) C7—C8—H8 120.3
C2—C3—H3 109.4 C9—C8—H8 120.3
C4—C3—H3 109.4 O1—C9—C8 116.7 (2)
Br1—C3—H3 109.4 O1—C9—C10 123.0 (2)
O2—C4—C10 123.6 (2) C8—C9—C10 120.3 (2)
O2—C4—C3 121.3 (2) C9—C10—C5 119.0 (2)
C10—C4—C3 115.2 (2) C9—C10—C4 120.2 (2)
C6—C5—C10 120.6 (3) C5—C10—C4 120.7 (2)
C9—O1—C2—C3 49.0 (3) C7—C8—C9—O1 179.5 (2)
O1—C2—C3—C4 −51.4 (3) C7—C8—C9—C10 −0.1 (4)
O1—C2—C3—Br1 66.0 (2) O1—C9—C10—C5 179.9 (2)
C2—C3—C4—O2 −153.8 (2) C8—C9—C10—C5 −0.5 (3)
Br1—C3—C4—O2 85.3 (2) O1—C9—C10—C4 −2.5 (3)
C2—C3—C4—C10 27.4 (3) C8—C9—C10—C4 177.1 (2)
Br1—C3—C4—C10 −93.5 (2) C6—C5—C10—C9 0.6 (3)
C10—C5—C6—C7 0.0 (4) C6—C5—C10—C4 −177.0 (2)
C5—C6—C7—C8 −0.6 (4) O2—C4—C10—C9 179.9 (2)
C6—C7—C8—C9 0.7 (4) C3—C4—C10—C9 −1.4 (3)
C2—O1—C9—C8 158.5 (2) O2—C4—C10—C5 −2.5 (4)
C2—O1—C9—C10 −21.8 (3) C3—C4—C10—C5 176.2 (2)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
C2—H2A···O2i 0.99 2.44 3.311 (3) 146

Symmetry code: (i) −x, −y+1, −z.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: GO2082).

References

  1. Betz, R., McCleland, C. & Marchand, H. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, o1151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  2. Bruker (2006). APEX2 and SAINT Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  3. Cho, H., Katoh, S., Sayama, S., Murakami, K., Nakanishi, H., Kajimoto, Y., Ueno, H., Kawasaki, H., Aisaka, K. & Uchida, I. (1996). J. Med. Chem. 39, 3797–3805. [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Farrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849–854.
  5. Piel, I., Steinmetz, M., Hirano, K., Fröhlich, R., Grimme, S. & Glorius, F. (2011). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 4983–4987. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Schollmeyer, D., Kammerer, B., Peifer, C. & Laufer, S. (2005). Acta Cryst. E61, o868–o869.
  7. Shaikh, M. M., Kruger, H. G., Bodenstein, J., Smith, P. & du Toit, K. (2012). Nat. Prod. Res. 26, 1473–1483. [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Shaikh, M. M., Kruger, H. G., Smith, P., Bodenstein, J. & du Toit, K. (2013a). J. Pharm. Res. 6, 21–25.
  9. Shaikh, M. M., Kruger, H. G., Smith, P., Munro, O. Q., Bodenstein, J. & du Toit, K. (2013b). J. Pharm. Res. 6, 1–5.
  10. Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SADABS University of Göttingen, Germany.
  11. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  12. Simas, A. B. C., Furtado, L. F. O. & Costa, P. R. R. (2002). Tetrahedron Lett. 43, 6893–6895.
  13. Xu, Z.-Q., Buckheit Jnr, R. W., Stup, T. L., Flavin, M. T., Khilevich, A., Rizzo, J. D., Lin, L. & Zembower, D. E. (1998). Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 8, 2179–2184. [DOI] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, L., Zhang, W.-G., Kang, J., Bao, K., Dai, Y. & Yao, X.-S. (2008). J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 10, 909–913. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813005394/go2082sup1.cif

e-69-0o473-sup1.cif (14.9KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813005394/go2082Isup2.hkl

e-69-0o473-Isup2.hkl (81.8KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813005394/go2082Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES