Skip to main content

Some NLM-NCBI services and products are experiencing heavy traffic, which may affect performance and availability. We apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your patience. For assistance, please contact our Help Desk at info@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 18.
Published in final edited form as: Hypertens Res. 2011 Aug 4;35(1):55–61. doi: 10.1038/hr.2011.135

Relationship of visit-to-visit and ambulatory blood pressure variability to vascular function in African Americans

KM Diaz 1, P Veerabhadrappa 1, MA Kashem 2, DL Feairheller 4, KM Sturgeon 1, ST Williamson 1, DL Crabbe 2, MD Brown 1,3
PMCID: PMC3629695  NIHMSID: NIHMS457359  PMID: 21814215

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Visit-to-visit clinic blood pressure variability (BPV) and 24-hour BPV have both been identified as independent risk factors for cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality; however the mechanisms contributing to the increased CV risk as yet are unclear. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between BPV and endothelial function in a cohort of putatively healthy African Americans.

METHODS

36 African Americans who were sedentary, non-diabetic, non-smoking, free of cardiovascular and renal disease and not on antihypertensive medication followed an American Heart Association low fat, low salt diet for 6 weeks. Upon completion of the 6-week dietary stabilization period, participants underwent 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring and had their office BP measured on three separate days. Right brachial artery diameter was assessed at rest, during reactive hyperemia (flow-mediated dilation: FMD), and after nitroglycerin administration (nitroglycerin-mediated dilation: NMD).

RESULTS

Participants classified as having decreased endothelial function according to either %FMD or the FMD/NMD ratio had significantly higher 24-hour BPV and a trend for higher visit-to-visit BPV when compared to participants with normal endothelial function. Continuous variable analyses revealed a significant positive association between NMD and 24-hour diastolic BPV (DBPV). Visit-to-visit systolic BPV (SBPV), 24-hour SBPV, and 24-hour DBPV were all negatively associated with the FMD/NMD ratio. All relationships remained significant after adjustment for age, BMI, and mean BP levels.

CONCLUSIONS

These results may suggest that BPV is in increased in African Americans with decreased endothelial function and is associated with the vascular smooth muscle response to nitric oxide.

Keywords: African Americans, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, blood pressure variability, endothelial function

Introduction

For many years, transient fluctuations in blood pressure (BP) were generally thought to not have prognostic importance or mandate treatment in the same way as elevations in mean BP. However, in recent years evidence has accumulated to show that blood pressure variability (BPV) has a striking relationship with cardiovascular risk and is predictive of future cardiovascular events, independent of mean BP levels. Two recent examples were provided by data from the Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate E Loro Associazioni (PAMELA) and the Ohasama studies which both reported that measures of BPV within a 24-hour period were independent predictors of cardiovascular mortality in the general population 1, 2. In addition to fluctuations in BP from reading-to-reading over a 24-hour period using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), several publications in 2010 and 2011 have shown that visit-to-visit variability in clinic BP is also a powerful predictor of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality 3, 4. Most recently, Muntner et al, via retrospective analysis of the general population-based Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), showed that visit-to-visit BPV was associated with increased all-cause mortality independent of mean BP levels, as subjects in the middle and highest tertiles of visit-to-visit BPV had a >50% greater risk of all-cause mortality than subjects in the lowest tertile of visit-to-visit BPV 3.

Despite the mounting evidence and growing interest in visit-to-visit and ambulatory BPV, scant attention has been paid to the mechanisms by which high BPV may confer a greater cardiovascular risk. It has been suggested that the augmented mechanical stress placed on the vasculature as a result of increased variability of blood flow may induce a subclinical inflammatory vascular response which, in turn, could lead to the impairment of endothelial function 5. In support of this hypothesis, we and several others have shown that high 24-hour BPV is strongly associated with biomarkers of systemic and vascular inflammation, independent of mean BP levels 5-8. However, to the best of our knowledge, no previous study has assessed the relationship between BPV and endothelial function. When considering that impaired endothelial function has been strongly associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality 9-11, the previously observed associations between high BPV and increased cardiovascular risk could be mediated via the impairment of endothelial function. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to investigate the association between endothelial function and both visit-to-visit and ambulatory BPV in a cohort of putatively healthy African Americans.

Methods

Participants

Participants were recruited via mailed brochures and local newspaper advertisements. Upon response to either, participants were contacted by telephone to assess eligibility. Each participant gave written informed consent following explanation of study protocols during their first laboratory visit. The protocol was approved by the Temple University Institutional Review Board.

The study included African Americans between the ages of 40-75 who were sedentary (regular aerobic exercise < 2 days/week), non-smoking, non-morbidly obese (BMI < 40 kg/m2), not on lipid-lowering medication, had a clinic BP < 160/100 mmHg, and had no history of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, hypercholesterolermia, renal disease, or lung disease. Both pre- (n = 15) and post-menopausal (n = 12) women were included in the study; all post-menopausal women were not on hormone replacement therapy. Participants on more than one anti-hypertensive medication were excluded from the study.

Screening

To ensure the eligibility of all qualified participants, three screening visits were completed prior to inclusion in the study. Screening visit one consisted of blood sampling and urinalysis following a 12-hour overnight fast to assess blood chemistries and renal function. Any individual with total cholesterol > 240 mg/dL or fasting blood glucose > 126 mg/dL were excluded from the study. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the four-variable MDRD study equation specific to African Americans 12. Any individual who exhibited evidence of renal disease (eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2) was excluded from the study.

Screening visits two and three required all qualified participants to undergo a physician administered physical examination and echocardiogram bicycle stress test to confirm that participants displayed no evidence of cardiovascular, pulmonary, or other chronic diseases.

Dietary Stabilization

In order to rule out the confounding effect of variations in dietary intake, participants who met all inclusion criteria after screening underwent dietary stabilization for 6-weeks prior to testing. Any participant receiving anti-hypertensive monotherapy (n = 12) was tapered off of their medication during this dietary stabilization period. Participants were instructed by a Registered Dietician on the American Heart Association Dietary Guidelines for Healthy American Adults 13. This diet consisted of ~ 55% of total daily calories from carbohydrates, 15% from protein, and < 30% from fat, with saturated fat ≤ 10% of total calories, sodium ≤ 3-4 g/day, and cholesterol intake < 300 mg/ day. Participants met with the dietician once/week at which time body weight was recorded for each visit. Participants were required to remain within 5% of their study entry body weight for the duration of the study. Compliance to the prescribed diet was monitored by completion of a 3-day food record at the conclusion of dietary stabilization. All participants who were in compliance with the diet underwent testing 1-2 weeks after dietary stabilization.

Office BP Measurements

Office BP measurements were made in accordance with JNC 7 guidelines 14 on three separate visits by trained laboratory personnel. BP was measured using a mercury sphygmomanometer after 5 minutes of quite rest in a chair with feet on the floor and arm supported at heart level. The appropriate size cuff was determined by upper arm circumference. BP measurements were performed in triplicate, 5 minutes apart, and the average of the three values was used as the BP for the visit. The mean duration between visits 1 and 2 was 7 ± 1 days. The mean duration between visits 2 and 3 was 8 ± 1 days. Using the mean systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) from each visit, the standard deviation and coefficient of variation for SBP and DBP across study visits were calculated as measures of BPV.

24-Hour ABPM

Participants underwent 24-hour ABPM using a non-invasive monitor (SpaceLabs Medical Inc., Model 90219, Redmond, WA) beginning on the morning of each participant's typical day, with the exclusion of Friday through Sunday. The BP cuff was fitted to participant's non-dominant arm with cuff size determined by upper arm circumference. BP measurements were obtained at 30-minute intervals during the day (6:00am-10:00pm) and 60-minute intervals at night (10:00pm-6:00am). Participants were instructed not to exercise prior to or during the monitoring period and to pause momentarily and maintain their body position during each BP measurement. Throughout the duration of the recording period, participants were required to maintain a diary in which they recorded their activity at the time of each BP measurement. Only recordings of good technical quality (> 80% of valid BP measurements) were included in final analyses.

Analysis of ABPM Data

24-hour mean values were calculated for SBP and DBP. BPV was calculated using two different parameters: the average real variability index (ARV) and the time rate of variation index. The ARV index and the time rate of variation index were calculated as previously described 15. The rationale for selecting the ARV index for BPV calculations is based on previous studies that have reported the ARV index to be a more reliable representation of time series variability than standard deviation or coefficient of variation 16, 17. We selected the time rate of variation as an additional measure of BPV because it accounts for the order in which the BP measurements are obtained, as well as the time between successive readings 18. Moreover, this parameter permits the evaluation of how fast or slow and in which direction BP values change. The rationale for using both the ARV index and the time rate of variation was to allow us to quantify the absolute magnitude of BPV (ARV index), while also considering the magnitude of BPV in relation to the time that elapsed between successive BP readings (time rate of BPV).

Bioelectrial Impedance Analysis (BIA)

Body composition was assessed by whole-body BIA using the single frequency impedance instrument ImpediMed DF50 (San Diego, CA). BIA was measured at 50 kHz on the right side of the body, with two electrodes placed on each dorsal right hand and dorsal right foot while participants were lying in a supine position with their legs slightly apart and hands resting next to the body palms down. Participants were asked to remove all jewelry and other accessories prior to measurements. All electrode sites were cleaned with an alcohol swab before attachment. Measures were taken after at least 10 minutes of lying in the supine position to reduce possible errors from acute changes in body fluid distribution. Three measurements were taken; and the mean output values of impedance, phase, resistance, and reactance were used for calculations of total fat mass and total lean body mass according to the manufacturer's standard operating procedures.

Brachial artery ultrasound assessment of endothelial-dependent and –independent function

Brachial artery (BA) diameter was measured in response to increased flow (flow-mediated vasodilation: FMD) and in response to nitroglycerin (nitroglycerin-mediated dilation: NMD) as previously described 19. All measurements were performed in the morning following an overnight fast during which time participants refrained from food, drink (with the exception of water), caffeine, alcohol, anti-histamine, and anti-inflammatory medications. A 7.5-MHz linear phased array ultrasound transducer attached to a Sonos 5500 ultrasound machine (Philips Medical Systems, Bothell, Washington, USA) was used to image the BA longitudinally. Electrocardiogram was continuously monitored All measurements of BA diameter were taken after at least 10 minutes of lying in the supine position by a trained cardiologist in a quiet and dim room at controlled ambient temperatures (20°C-26°C). The participant's right arm was comfortably immobilized in the extending position, allowing for ultrasound scanning of the BA artery 5–10 cm above the antecubital fossa. Baseline images of the right BA were first obtained. After recording of baseline images, reactive hyperemia was induced by distal occlusion of the vessel using a cuff inflated to suprasystolic pressure (200 mmHg) for 5 minutes on the right forearm, distal to the antecubital fossa as described by Corretti et al. 20. BA diameter was imaged at 60 seconds and recorded for 5 minutes post cuff-release. After at least 15 minutes of rest, new baseline images were obtained and a 0.4 mg nitroglycerin tablet was given sublingually to assess endothelium-independent vasodilation. Images were then recorded 4 minutes later.

Offline image analysis was performed by trained personnel blinded to image sequence and participants’ clinical data. Arterial diameter was measured from the anterior to the posterior “m” line (the interface between media and adventitia) at end-diastole, incident with the R-wave on the electrocardiogram. BA vasodilator response to reactive hyperemia and nitroglycerin was calculated as the maximal %change in BA diameter (FMD: at 60 seconds; NMD: at 4 minutes) from baseline. As an additional index of endothelial function, the ratio of response to intrinsic nitric oxide (NO)/response to exogenous NO (FMD/NMD ratio) was calculated in order to correct for vascular smooth muscle (VSM) function in each participant.

Statistical Analysis

Data are expressed as means ± SEM. The distribution of all variables was examined using the Shapiro-Wilk test of normality. Variables that were not normally distributed (total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides) were log transformed for statistical analyses, but true physiological values are reported throughout the manuscript for ease of interpretation. Participants were classified into groups according to their %FMD, %NMD, and FMD/NMD Ratio. Any participant at or above the median value for the vascular function measure (%FMD, %NMD, or FMD/NMD ratio) was classified as having normal function; while any participant below the median for the vascular function measure was classified as having decreased function. Comparisons between groups were tested using the independent t-test for continuous variables and Pearson's chi-square test for dichotomous variables.

The relationship of each clinical variable and BP parameter with %FMD, %NTG-mediated dilation, and the FMD/NMD ratio as continuous variables was tested using univariate regression analyses. All variables significantly associated with %FMD, %NMD, or the FMD/NMD ratio in univariate regression analyses were then inserted separately into a multivariate regression model containing variables known to impact vascular function: age, BMI, 24-hour SBP, and 24-hour DBP. For all BPV indices entered into the model, the corresponding mean BP value was entered into each model (e.g., if the dependent variable for a given model was a 24-hour BPV variable, the model was adjusted for 24-hour SBP and DBP). Each model was evaluated for multicollinearity among variables. The variance inflation factor was < 5 for all models (range: 1.031-3.247). P-values < .05 were considered statistically significant for all analyses. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

Results

A total of 36 African Americans who met the study criteria formed the study population. The average age was 52.0 ± 1.0 years and 25% were male. Mean BMI for the entire study group was 32.3 ± 0.9 kg/m2, and the mean total cholesterol was 4.9 ± 0.1 mmol/L. The mean office SBP and DBP were 125.5 ± 1.9 mmHg and 79.9 ± 1.0 mmHg, respectively. The mean 24-hour SBP and DBP from ABPM were 127.8 ± 1.8 mmHg and 78.7 ± 1.4 mmHg, respectively. Mean %FMD for the entire study group was 7.2 ± 0.4% and the mean for %NMD was 16.1 ± 0.9%.

Table 1 shows the comparisons between normal and decreased endothelial function groups for all clinical characteristics and BP parameters when classified according to their %FMD. Fat mass and % body fat were significantly higher in the decreased endothelial function group. BMI and the prevalence of females also tended to be higher in the decreased endothelial function group, but not significantly. A trend for lower serum creatinine levels in the decreased endothelial function group was also found. There were no significant differences between the normal and decreased endothelial function groups for mean BP levels obtained from office measures or ABPM. For measures of visit-to-visit office BPV, the standard deviation of DBP across visits tended to be higher in the decreased endothelial function group, however this difference did not reach statistical significance. For measures of BPV obtained during ABPM, 24-hour SBP variability (SBPV) was significantly higher in the decreased endothelial function group.

Table 1.

Clinical characteritcs and BP parameters for endothelial function groups classified according to %FMD.

Variable Normal Endothelial Function %FMD ≥ 7% (n = 18) Decreased Endothelial Function %FMD < 7% (n = 18) P-Value
Age (years) 51.3 ± 1.6 52.2 ± 1.2 0.68
Male (%)/Female (%) 7(39%)/11(61%) 2(11%)/16(89%) 0.05
Antihypertensive Medication (%) 27.7 38.8 0.48
BMI (kg/m2) 31.0 ± 1.5 34.2 ± 1.0 0.09
Fat Free Mass (kg) 52.8 ± 2.5 54.6 ± 1.8 0.56
Fat Mass (kg) 33.7 ± 3.2 44.5 ± 1.9 0.008*
% Fat 37.9 ± 2.0 45.9 ± 1.3 0.002*
Total Cholesterol (mmol/L) 5.0 ± 0.1 4.8 ± 0.1 0.34
LDL Cholesterol (mmol/L) 2.8 ± 0.1 2.6 ± 0.1 0.27
HDL Cholesterol (mmol/L) 1.6 ± 0.1 1.7 ± 0.1 0.53
Trigylcerides (mmol/L) 1.1 ± 0.1 0.8 ± 0.1 0.17
Fasting Glucose (mmol/L) 5.3 ± 0.1 5.3 ± 0.1 0.89
Serum Creatinine (μmol/L) 82.2 ± 2.6 74.2 ± 2.6 0.06
eGFR (mL/min per 1.73 m2) 92.9 ± 3.3 97.4 ± 4.0 0.39
Baseline BA Diameter (mm) 3.5 ± 0.1 3.6 ± 0.1 0.82
FMD (%) 9.2 ± 0.3 5.4 ± 0.2 < 0.001*
NMD (%) 17.5 ± 1.1 15.0 ± 1.4 0.18
FMD/NMD Ratio 0.55 ± 0.03 0.43 ± 0.05 0.06
Office SBP (mmHg) 122.3 ± 2.5 128.7 ± 2.8 0.10
Office DBP (mmHg) 77.8 ± 1.6 82.0 ± 1.9 0.11
Office SBPV STD (mmHg) 5.1 ± 0.6 6.5 ± 0.8 0.21
Office DBPV STD (mmHg) 3.7 ± 0.6 5.3 ± 0.6 0.07
Office SBPV CV (%) 4.2 ± 0.5 4.8 ± 0.5 0.44
Office DBPV CV (%) 4.7 ± 0.8 6.4 ± 0.8 0.13
24-hour SBP (mmHg) 127.8 ± 2.3 127.9 ± 3.0 0.97
24-hour DBP (mmHg) 77.7 ± 1.5 79.7 ± 2.5 0.51
24-hour SBPV (mmHg) 8.1 ± 0.3 9.4 ± 0.5 0.04*
24-hour DBPV (mmHg) 7.5 ± 0.3 8.4 ± 0.5 0.14
24-hour Rate of SBPV (mmHg/min) 0.24 ± 0.01 0.27 ± 0.01 0.14
24-hour Rate of DBPV (mmHg/min) 0.21 ± 0.01 0.24 ± 0.01 0.10

BA, brachial artery; BMI, body mass index; CV, coefficient of variation; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; DBPV, diastolic blood pressure variaiblity; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; FMD, flow-mediated dilation; NMD, nitroglycerin-mediated dilation; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SBPV, systolic blood pressure variability; STD, standard deviation.

Table 2 shows the comparisons between normal and decreased endothelial function groups for all clinical characteristics and BP parameters when classified according to their FMD/NMD Ratio. Fat mass and %body fat were higher in the decreased endothelial function group, however this difference was only significant for % body fat. The decreased endothelial function group also showed non-significant trends for a higher prevalence of females, lower LDL cholesterol, lower serum creatinine levels, and higher eGFR. For measures of visit-to-visit office BPV, the standard deviation of SBP across visits tended to be higher in the decreased endothelial function group, however this difference did not reach statistical significance. For measures of BPV obtained during ABPM, 24-hour DBP variability (DBPV), the rate of 24-hour SBPV, and the rate of 24-hour DBPV were all significantly higher in the decreased endothelial function group. 24-hour SBPV also tended to be higher in the decreased endothelial function group, however this difference was not statically significant.

Table 2.

Clinical characteritcs and BP parameters for endothelial function groups classified according to FMD/NMD ratio.

Variable Normal Endothelial Function FMD/NMD Ratio ≥ 0.48 (n = 18) Decreased Endothelial Function FMD/NMD Ratio < 0.48 (n = 18) P-Value
Age (years) 53.0 ± 1.8 50.6 ± 1.0 0.25
Male (%)/Female (%) 7(39%)/11(61%) 2(11%)/16(89%) 0.05
Antihypertensive Medication (%) 33.3 33.3 1.00
BMI (kg/m2) 31.9 ± 1.4 33.2 ± 1.2 0.48
Fat Free Mass (kg) 54.7 ± 2.6 53.0 ± 1.9 0.59
Fat Mass (kg) 35.0 ± 3.0 42.4 ± 2.6 0.07
% Fat 38.3 ± 2.1 44.9 ± 1.5 0.01*
Total Cholesterol (mmol/L) 5.0 ± 0.1 4.7 ± 0.1 0.11
LDL Cholesterol (mmol/L) 2.9 ± 0.1 2.5 ± 0.1 0.08
HDL Cholesterol (mmol/L) 1.6 ± 0.1 1.7 ± 0.1 0.69
Trigylcerides (mmol/L) 1.0 ± 0.1 0.9 ± 0.1 0.35
Fasting Glucose (mmol/L) 5.2 ± 0.1 5.3 ± 0.1 0.76
Serum Creatinine (μmol/L) 73.2 ± 2.2 62.5 ± 1.5 0.004*
eGFR (mL/min per 1.73 m2) 90.2 ± 3.7 99.4 ± 3.3 0.07
Baseline BA Diameter (mm) 3.6 ± 0.1 3.6 ± 0.1 0.99
FMD (%) 8.0 ± 0.5 6.8 ± 0.4 0.11
NMD (%) 12.6 ± 1.0 19.4 ± 1.0 < 0.001*
FMD/NMD Ratio 0.66 ± 0.04 0.35 ± 0.01 < 0.001*
Office SBP (mmHg) 122.7 ± 2.1 127.8 ± 1.8 0.19
Office DBP (mmHg) 78.1 ± 1.0 81.4 ± 2.1 0.17
Office SBPV STD (mmHg) 4.8 ± 0.7 6.6 ± 0.7 0.09
Office DBPV STD (mmHg) 3.4 ± 0.8 5.0 ± 0.6 0.22
Office SBPV CV (%) 3.9 ± 0.6 5.0 ± 0.5 0.15
Office DBPV CV (%) 5.0 ± 0.9 6.0 ± 0.7 0.41
24-hour SBP (mmHg) 125.8 ± 2.2 129.8 ± 2.9 0.29
24-hour DBP (mmHg) 79.6 ± 1.3 77.8 ± 2.6 0.54
24-hour SBPV (mmHg) 8.1 ± 0.3 9.3 ± 0.4 0.06
24-hour DBPV (mmHg) 7.4 ± 0.3 8.6 ± 0.4 0.04*
24-hour Rate of SBPV (mmHg/min) 0.23 ± 0.01 0.27 ± 0.01 0.02*
24-hour Rate of DBPV (mmHg/min) 0.20 ± 0.01 0.25 ± 0.01 0.01*

BA, brachial artery; BMI, body mass index; CV, coefficient of variation; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; DBPV, diastolic blood pressure variaiblity; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; FMD, flow-mediated dilation; NMD, nitroglycerin-mediated dilation; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SBPV, systolic blood pressure variability; STD, standard deviation.

When participants were divided into normal (%NMD ≥ 16%, n = 18) or decreased (%NMD < 16%, n = 18) smooth muscle-dependent dilation groups according to their %NMD, there were no significant differences between the two groups for mean BP levels and all BPV indices.

The regression and Pearson correlation coefficients from univariate regression analyses of all clinical and BP variables significantly associated with either %FMD, %NMD, or FMD/NMD ratio are provided in Table 3. Triglyceride levels and female gender were both significantly associated with %FMD. Mean BP levels and BPV indices showed no associations with %FMD. Total cholesterol, serum creatinine, eGFR, 24-hour DBPV, and the rate of 24-hour DBPV were all significantly associated with %NMD. The positive values of the Pearson correlation coefficients indicate that higher BPV was associated with higher %NMD. The standard deviation of SBP across office visits, the coefficient of variation of SBP across office visits, 24-hour DBPV, the rate of 24-hour SBPV, and the rate of 24-hour DBPV were all significantly associated with the FMD/NMD ratio. The negative values of the Pearson correlation coefficients indicate that higher BPV was associated with a lower FMD/NMD ratio. All remaining clinical variables and mean BP levels showed no significant associations with %NMD or the FMD/NMD ratio.

Table 3.

Univariate regression analyses predicting vascular function measures.

FMD (%)
NMD (%)
FMD/NMD Ratio
B (95% CI) r P B (95% CI) r P B (95% CI) r P
Female Gender -1.71 (-3.40--0.02) 0.04
Triglycerides 1.76 (0.19-3.34) 0.34 0.03
Total Cholesterol -3.07 (-6.20-0.06) -0.33 0.04
Serum Creatinine -0.13 (-0.27--0.01) -0.31 0.05
eGFR 0.12 (0.01-0.24) 0.32 0.04
Office SBPV (STD) -0.02 (-0.05--0.01) -0.39 0.02
Office SBPV (CV) -0.03 (-0.06--0.01) -0.35 0.04
24-hour DBPV 1.25 (0.29-2.21) 0.42 0.01 -0.05 (-0.08--0.01) -0.41 0.01
24-hour Rate of SBPV -1.23 (-2.46--0.01) -0.32 0.04
24-hour Rate of DBPV 41.82 (11.54-72.10) 0.42 0.008 -1.63 (-2.73--0.54) -0.45 0.004

B, unstardardized regression coefficient; CI, confidence interval; CV, coefficent of variation; DBPV, diastolic blood pressure variability; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; FMD, flow-mediated dilation; NMD, nitroglycerin-mediated dilation; r, Pearson correlation coefficient; SBPV, systolic blood pressure variability.

The regression and partial correlation coefficients from the multivariate regression model are provided in Table 4. Serum creatinine, eGFR, 24-hour DBPV, and the rate of 24-hour DBPV all remained significantly associated with %NMD. For the FMD/NMD ratio, the standard deviation of SBP across office visits, the coefficient of variation of SBP across office visits, 24-hour DBPV, the rate of 24-hour SBPV, and the rate of 24-hour DBPV all remained significantly associated with the FMD/NMD ratio after adjusting for age, BMI, and mean BP levels.

Table 4.

Multivariate regression analyses predicting vascular function measures.

FMD (%)
NMD (%)
FMD/NMD Ratio
B (95% CI) Partial Correlation P B (95% CI) Partial Correlation P B (95% CI) Partial Correlation P
Female Gender -1.51 (-3.48-0.46) 0.12
Triglycerides 1.47 (-0.33-3.28) 0.29 0.10
Total Cholesterol -2.42 (-6.21-1.35) -0.26 0.11
Serum Creatinine -0.14 (-0.28--0.01) -0.35 0.03
eGFR 0.15 (0.03-0.28) 0.43 0.02
Office SBPV (STD) -0.03 (-0.05--0.01) -0.42 0.03
Office SBPV (CV) -0.04 (-0.06--0.01) -0.39 0.03
24-hour DBPV 1.33 (0.33-2.32) 0.44 0.01 -0.04 (-0.08--0.01) -0.41 0.02
24-hour Rate of SBPV -1.46 (-2.88--0.03) -0.30 0.04
24-hour Rate of DBPV 40.90 (8.52-73.21) 0.42 0.01 -1.59 (-2.81--0.37) -0.44 0.01

The listed variables were entered separately into a multivariate regression model containing age, BMI, SBP, and DBP. B, unstardardized regression coefficient; CI, confidence interval; CV, coefficent of variation; DBPV, diastolic blood pressure variability; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; FMD, flow-mediated dilation; NMD, nitroglycerin-mediated dilation; SBPV, systolic blood pressure variability.

Discussion

In the present study, we investigated the relationship between measures of endothelial-dependent and –independent vasodilation and BPV in a cohort of African Americans. To fully elucidate this relationship, two measures of BPV were used: visit-to-visit BPV, reflective of long-term BP fluctuations over days and weeks; and 24-hour BPV, reflective of short-term BP fluctuations over hours. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to report on the relationship between measures of endothelial function and visit-to-visit BPV in any population. Moreover, though some studies have investigated the relationship between endothelial function and variables derived from ABPM 21, 22, never has the relationship between endothelial function and fluctuations in BP from measurement to measurement during ABPM been investigated. Thus, our study is also the first to report on the relationship between measures of endothelial function and 24-hour BPV in any population. Our results show that African Americans with decreased endothelial function, classified using either %FMD or the FMD/NMD ratio, had higher 24-hour BPV. Moreover, while not statistically significant, the decreased endothelial function group also had a trend for higher visit-to-visit BPV. When analyzed as continuous variables, our results show that higher visit-to-visit SBPV, and 24-hour SBPV and DBPV were all significantly associated with a lower FMD/NMD ratio, independent of age, BMI, and mean BP. The use of the FMD/NMD ratio as a marker of endothelial function is predicated off the assumption that NMD is representative of the maximal achievable diameter of the BA; hence the lower the FMD/NMD ratio the less that an individual attains of their maximal vasodilatory capacity. Therefore, our finding that high BPV is associated with a lower FMD/NMD ratio may indicate that endothelial specific vasodilatory mechanisms are impaired in African Americans who exhibit high BPV.

Because of the cross-sectional design of the present study, it is difficult to ascertain whether high BPV precedes impaired endothelial function or vice versa. The most compelling evidence for high BPV being a cause rather than a consequence of impaired endothelial function stems from animal studies using sinoaortic-denervation (SAD) rats. SAD is a procedure whereby the arterial baroreflex system is interrupted, causing significant increases in BPV without eliciting changes in mean BP levels. SAD rats, therefore, are considered to be an animal model for BPV, as the physiological changes caused by high BPV can be investigated without the confounding effect of hypertension 23. Previous studies in SAD rats have shown that impaired endothelial function is present in this animal model of high BPV after SAD, thus providing experimental evidence in support of the hypothesis that high BPV may be a contributing factor in the pathogenesis impaired endothelial function 24, 25. It has also been reported that inflammatory-related factors are increased in SAD rats, and that long-term anti-inflammatory and antioxidant treatment prevents SAD-induced organ damage; suggestive that inflammation could be the underlying mechanism facilitating endothelial dysfunction in SAD rats 26. In the present study, our finding of increased BPV in African Americans categorized as having decreased endothelial function provides the first clinical data in human subjects that high BPV may be associated with impaired endothelial function. We have also previously reported in this cohort of African Americans that high BPV is associated with increased circulating levels of biomarkers for systemic inflammation 9. Both findings coincide with experimental findings in SAD rats, and could strengthen the hypothesis that BPV confers a greater cardiovascular risk through the induction of vascular damage, which in turn may attenuate endothelial function. Of course, prospective longitudinal studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

It has been proposed that the FMD/NMD ratio is the best available marker of endothelial function because differences in the VSM response to NO can be accounted for 27, 28. The FMD/NMD ratio was first utilized in 1993, when Celermajer et al showed that the FMD/NMD ratio was decreased in adult smokers when compared to adult non-smokers 29. Subsequent studies utilizing the FMD/NMD ratio have reported that it is decreased in essential hypertension and diabetes, and is associated with the number of cardiovascular risk factors 27, 30, 31. The most supportive data for the FMD/NMD ratio serving as the best available marker of endothelial function, comes from a study by Chan et al who showed that the FMD/NMD ratio was a more powerful predictor of vascular events than FMD 32. This finding led investigators to suggest that the portion of vascular dilation related solely to endothelial mechanisms and not smooth muscle mechanisms is most important, and that the calculation of the FMD/NMD ratio is advantageous for determining the true prognostic value of endothelial function independent of smooth muscle function. In the present study, when analyzed as a continuous variable, the FMD/NMD ratio was negatively associated with measures of visit-to-visit and 24-hour BPV. If the FMD/NMD ratio is indeed the best available marker of endothelial function; our study findings could provide important information regarding the clinical importance of monitoring BPV. Unfortunately, though the FMD/NMD ratio is used by some investigators, it is frequently not reported in the literature despite sound rationale and previous data supporting its use, thus its true prognostic value has not be clearly established. Therefore, though provocative, our findings may be tempered to some extent by a lack of studies investigating the clinical and prognostic importance of the FMD/NMD ratio.

In the present study, though differences in BPV were observed between endothelial function groups classified according to %FMD, when %FMD was analyzed as a continuous variable we found no associations between %FMD and any measure of BPV. This finding is contrary to the significant associations found between the FMD/NMD ratio and measures of both visit-to-visit and 24-hour BPV in our study population. Reasons for significant associations only being found for the FMD/NMD ratio and not %FMD are unclear, but could, in part, be confounded by differences in the VSM response to NO. We found that high 24-hour DBPV was associated with an increased VSM response to nitroglycerin. Considering the lack of association between FMD and BPV, the negative association between the FMD/NMD ratio and BPV could be driven by the effect of BPV on VSM responsiveness to nitroglycerin rather than its deleterious effect on FMD. Consistent with this hypothesis, previous animal studies have reported differences in vascular reactivity to contractile and vasodilatory agonists between SAD rats and sham operated rats 33. Interestingly, Rocha et al. found that expression of integral membrane proteins responsible for the formation of gap junctions in VSM were increased in SAD rats; leading investigators to propose that the differences in vascular reactivity observed between SAD rats and sham operated rats could be the result of increased gap junction communication in the SAD rats 33. Given that NO-induced vasodilation has previously been shown to be dependent on cell-to-cell diffusion of cGMP through gap junctions 34, we hypothesize that a potential mechanism for the association between high BPV and a greater vasodilatory response to nitroglycerin could be the result of increased gap junction communication in the arteries of individual's with high BPV. However, although we think this hypothesis is reasonable, it should be acknowledged that the present study cannot confirm the real mechanism contributing to the observed association between NMD and BPV. Furthermore, more clinical studies will be needed to further elucidate the relationship between BPV and vascular reactivity to vasodilatory agonists, as well as contractile agonists.

Several limitations of this study must be noted when interpreting our findings. First, our sample size is small. However, because of our extensive exclusion criteria, many confounding variables that may influence vascular function were controlled for. Second, only African Americans were included in the study. Therefore, are study findings are not generalizable to other race-ethnicities. Third, the reproducibility of BPV may be poor due to the large influence of daily activity on BPV. However, recent reports have shown that both visit-to-visit and 24-hour BPV have fairly good reproducibility 35, 36. Finally, our cross-sectional study design allowed us to assess the relationship between vascular function and BPV, but not to assess cause-effect relationships.

In conclusion, our study provides novel information by assessing the relationship between BPV and measures of vascular function for the first time in humans. Our findings provide some evidence that BPV may be in increased in African Americans with decreased endothelial function and is associated with the VSM response to NO. Additional research is needed to confirm these results and determine the clinical relevance of the FMD/NMD ratio.

Acknowledgments

Research Support: This research was supported by NIH/NHLBI Grant RO1 HL085497 (PI, Michael Brown) and by NIH/NIA Grant KO1 AG019640 (PI, Michael Brown).

Footnotes

Disclosure: We the authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Kikuya M, Ohkubo T, Asayama K, Metoki H, Obara T, Saito S, Hashimoto J, Totsune K, Hoshi H, Satoh H, Imai Y. Ambulatory blood pressure and 10-year risk of cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality: the Ohasama study. Hypertension. 2005;45:240–245. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000152079.04553.2c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mancia G, Bombelli M, Facchetti R, Madotto F, Corrao G, Trevano FQ, Grassi G, Sega R. Long-term prognostic value of blood pressure variability in the general population: results of the Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate e Loro Associazioni Study. Hypertension. 2007;49:1265–1270. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.088708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Muntner P, Shimbo D, Tonelli M, Reynolds K, Arnett DK, Oparil S. The relationship between visit-to-visit variability in systolic blood pressure and all-cause mortality in the general population: findings from NHANES III, 1988 to 1994. Hypertension. 2011;57:160–166. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.162255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rothwell PM, Howard SC, Dolan E, O'Brien E, Dobson JE, Dahlof B, Sever PS, Poulter NR. Prognostic significance of visit-to-visit variability, maximum systolic blood pressure, and episodic hypertension. Lancet. 2010;375:895–905. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60308-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kim KI, Lee JH, Chang HJ, Cho YS, Youn TJ, Chung WY, Chae IH, Choi DJ, Park KU, Kim CH. Association between blood pressure variability and inflammatory marker in hypertensive patients. Circ J. 2008;72:293–298. doi: 10.1253/circj.72.293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Abramson JL, Lewis C, Murrah NV, Anderson GT, Vaccarino V. Relation of C-reactive protein and tumor necrosis factor-alpha to ambulatory blood pressure variability in healthy adults. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:649–652. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.03.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tatasciore A, Zimarino M, Renda G, Zurro M, Soccio M, Prontera C, Emdin M, Flacco M, Schillaci G, DE CR. Awake blood pressure variability, inflammatory markers and target organ damage in newly diagnosed hypertension. Hypertens Res. 2008;31:2137–2146. doi: 10.1291/hypres.31.2137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Veerabhadrappa P, Diaz KM, Feairheller DL, Sturgeon KM, Williamson S, Crabbe DL, Kashem A, Ahrensfield D, Brown MD. Enhanced blood pressure variability in a high cardiovascular risk group of African Americans: FIT4Life Study. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2010;4:187–195. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2010.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Green DJ, Jones H, Thijssen D, Cable NT, Atkinson G. Flow-mediated dilation and cardiovascular event prediction: does nitric oxide matter? Hypertension. 2011;57:363–369. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.167015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lind L, Berglund L, Larsson A, Sundstrom J. Endothelial Function in Resistance and Conduit Arteries and 5-Year Risk of Cardiovascular Disease. Circulation. 2011 doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.984047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yeboah J, Folsom AR, Burke GL, Johnson C, Polak JF, Post W, Lima JA, Crouse JR, Herrington DM. Predictive value of brachial flow-mediated dilation for incident cardiovascular events in a population-based study: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2009;120:502–509. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.864801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Levey AS, Coresh J, Greene T, Stevens LA, Zhang YL, Hendriksen S, Kusek JW, Van LF. Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:247–254. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-4-200608150-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Krauss RM, Deckelbaum RJ, Ernst N, Fisher E, Howard BV, Knopp RH, Kotchen T, Lichtenstein AH, McGill HC, Pearson TA, Prewitt TE, Stone NJ, Horn LV, Weinberg R. Dietary guidelines for healthy American adults. A statement for health professionals from the Nutrition Committee, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1996;94:1795–1800. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.94.7.1795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL, Jr., Jones DW, Materson BJ, Oparil S, Wright JT, Jr., Roccella EJ. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension. 2003;42:1206–1252. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000107251.49515.c2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Diaz KM, Feairheller DL, Sturgeon KM, Veerabhadrappa P, Williamson ST, Crabbe DL, Brown MD. Increased nitric oxide and attenuated diastolic blood pressure variability in African Americans with mildly impaired renal function. Int J Hypertens. 2010;2010:137206. doi: 10.4061/2010/137206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mena L, Pintos S, Queipo NV, Aizpurua JA, Maestre G, Sulbaran T. A reliable index for the prognostic significance of blood pressure variability. J Hypertens. 2005;23:505–511. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000160205.81652.5a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pierdomenico SD, Di NM, Esposito AL, Di MR, Ballone E, Lapenna D, Cuccurullo F. Prognostic value of different indices of blood pressure variability in hypertensive patients. Am J Hypertens. 2009;22:842–847. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2009.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zakopoulos NA, Tsivgoulis G, Barlas G, Papamichael C, Spengos K, Manios E, Ikonomidis I, Kotsis V, Spiliopoulou I, Vemmos K, Mavrikakis M, Moulopoulos SD. Time rate of blood pressure variation is associated with increased common carotid artery intima-media thickness. Hypertension. 2005;45:505–512. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000158306.87582.43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Veerabhadrappa P, Diaz KM, Kashem MA, Crabbe DL, Feairheller DL, Sturgeon KM, Williamson S, Brown MD. Endothelial dysfunction in prehypertensive African Americans with masked hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 2011 doi: 10.1038/ajh.2011.103. In Press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Corretti MC, Anderson TJ, Benjamin EJ, Celermajer D, Charbonneau F, Creager MA, Deanfield J, Drexler H, Gerhard-Herman M, Herrington D, Vallance P, Vita J, Vogel R. Guidelines for the ultrasound assessment of endothelial-dependent flow-mediated vasodilation of the brachial artery: a report of the International Brachial Artery Reactivity Task Force. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:257–265. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01746-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gupta AK, Cornelissen G, Greenway FL, Dhoopati V, Halberg F, Johnson WD. Abnormalities in circadian blood pressure variability and endothelial function: pragmatic markers for adverse cardiometabolic profiles in asymptomatic obese adults. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2010;9:58. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-9-58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Higashi Y, Nakagawa K, Kimura M, Noma K, Hara K, Sasaki S, Goto C, Oshima T, Chayama K, Yoshizumi M. Circadian variation of blood pressure and endothelial function in patients with essential hypertension:a comparison of dippers and non-dippers. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:2039–2043. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02535-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Norman RA, Jr., Coleman TG, Dent AC. Continuous monitoring of arterial pressure indicates sinoaortic denervated rats are not hypertensive. Hypertension. 1981;3:119–125. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.3.1.119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Eto M, Toba K, Akishita M, Kozaki K, Watanabe T, Kim S, Hashimoto M, Sudoh N, Yoshizumi M, Ouchi Y. Reduced endothelial vasomotor function and enhanced neointimal formation after vascular injury in a rat model of blood pressure lability. Hypertens Res. 2003;26:991–998. doi: 10.1291/hypres.26.991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Miao CY, Tao X, Gong K, Zhang SH, Chu ZX, Su DF. Arterial remodeling in chronic sinoaortic-denervated rats. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2001;37:6–15. doi: 10.1097/00005344-200101000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhang C, Chen H, Xie HH, Shu H, Yuan WJ, Su DF. Inflammation is involved in the organ damage induced by sinoaortic denervation in rats. J Hypertens. 2003;21:2141–2148. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200311000-00024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Oshima T, Ozono R, Yano Y, Higashi Y, Teragawa H, Miho N, Ishida T, Ishida M, Yoshizumi M, Kambe M. Beneficial effect of T-type calcium channel blockers on endothelial function in patients with essential hypertension. Hypertens Res. 2005;28:889–894. doi: 10.1291/hypres.28.889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wiltshire EJ, Gent R, Hirte C, Pena A, Thomas DW, Couper JJ. Endothelial dysfunction relates to folate status in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2002;51:2282–2286. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.7.2282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Celermajer DS, Sorensen KE, Georgakopoulos D, Bull C, Thomas O, Robinson J, Deanfield JE. Cigarette smoking is associated with dose-related and potentially reversible impairment of endothelium-dependent dilation in healthy young adults. Circulation. 88:2149–2155. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.88.5.2149. 199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Heiss C, Lauer T, Dejam A, Kleinbongard P, Hamada S, Rassaf T, Matern S, Feelisch M, Kelm M. Plasma nitroso compounds are decreased in patients with endothelial dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:573–579. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.06.089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sibal L, Aldibbiat A, Agarwal SC, Mitchell G, Oates C, Razvi S, Weaver JU, Shaw JA, Home PD. Circulating endothelial progenitor cells, endothelial function, carotid intima-media thickness and circulating markers of endothelial dysfunction in people with type 1 diabetes without macrovascular disease or microalbuminuria. Diabetologia. 2009;52:1464–1473. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1401-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chan SY, Mancini GB, Kuramoto L, Schulzer M, Frohlich J, Ignaszewski A. The prognostic importance of endothelial dysfunction and carotid atheroma burden in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:1037–1043. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00927-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rocha ML, Kihara AH, Davel AP, Britto LR, Rossoni LV, Bendhack LM. Blood pressure variability increases connexin expression in the vascular smooth muscle of rats. Cardiovasc Res. 2008;80:123–130. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvn178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Christ GJ, Brink PR, Ramanan SV. Dynamic gap junctional communication: a delimiting model for tissue responses. Biophys J. 1994;67:1335–1344. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80605-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Eguchi K, Hoshide S, Hoshide Y, Ishikawa S, Shimada K, Kario K. Reproducibility of ambulatory blood pressure in treated and untreated hypertensive patients. J Hypertens. 2010;28:918–924. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283378477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Howard SC, Rothwell PM. Reproducibility of measures of visit-to-visit variability in blood pressure after transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;28:331–340. doi: 10.1159/000229551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES