Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 18.
Published in final edited form as: Heart Rhythm. 2010 Dec 16;8(4):590–591. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.12.019

Commentary: The cardiac neuronal hierarchy and susceptibility to arrhythmias

Jeffrey L Ardell 1
PMCID: PMC3629697  NIHMSID: NIHMS259469  PMID: 21167959

Anatomical and functional data collected over the past two decades have led our group and others to propose the presence of a complex neuronal hierarchy that controls regional cardiac function 1. The maintenance of adequate cardiac function during basal conditions, as well as in the presence of stressors, ultimately depends upon the transduction characteristics of cardiac afferent neurons located in various levels of the cardiac neuronal hierarchy. It is the interdependent reflex processing of that sensory information at the peripheral and central aspects of the hierarchy for cardiac control that ultimately determines the efferent neuronal outflows that modulate regional cardiac function 1.

With regards to neural control of cardiac electrical stability, numerous lines of investigation have indicated that heterogeneous activation of select neuronal populations within the cardiac nervous system predisposes the heart to arrhythmias 2-5. Furthermore, other studies have shown there are inherent differences between animals with respect to reflexes evoked in response to acute cardiac stress such that i) reflex-induced changes in efferent neuronal output (sympathetic and parasympathetic) that remain coordinated, especially within and between intrathoracic processing networks, represent “electrically” stable states vs ii) those in which such reflex processing is heterogeneous - thereby leading to disruption of normal efferent neuronal outputs to the heart to induce cardiac electrical instability 1, 4. With the onset and progression of chronic cardiac disease, interactions between cardiac efferent nerves and cardiomyocytes remodel and the characteristics of these adjustments are fundamental to the etiology of disease progression. More importantly, recent studies have indicated that targeted modification of select elements within the cardiac nervous system provides novel opportunities for effective management of arrhythmias.

The paper by Shen et.al. 6 “Patterns of baseline autonomic nerve activity and the development of pacing-induced sustained atrial fibrillation” evaluates the potential differential contribution of the cardiac nervous system to induction of atrial arrhythmias using a rapid-pacing induced animal model of atrial fibrillation. Extracellular neural activity was continuously and simultaneously recorded from the left stellate ganglia, left vagus nerve, and from the left superior intrinsic cardiac ganglionated plexus. The characteristics of that neural activity were related to the spontaneous generation of paradoxical atrial tachycardia (PAT) and the time to onset of sustained atrial fibrillation (AF). The primary conclusions for the study were: 1) that ambulatory dogs with higher levels of sympthovagal correlation and higher vagal tone exhibited faster induction of sustained AF by rapid pacing; and 2) the majority (75%) of animals, which did not demonstrate these activity patterns, exhibited increased vagal activity in the week preceding the pacing-induced induction of sustained AF in association with a progressive reduction in indices of sympathetic activity.

The coordination of cardiac efferent neuronal activities in the regulation of regional cardiac indices is critically dependent upon the stochastic nature of cardiovascular sensory information processed by peripheral (intrinsic cardiac ganglia, intrathoracic extracardiac ganglia) as well as central (spinal cord and brainstem) components of the cardiac neuronal hierarchy 1. While the interactions within this system usually act to compensate for normal cardiovascular perturbations, this neuroaxis can be catastrophically disrupted by stresses that induce highly localized and excessive input signals to specific nexus points within the hierarchy 2, 4, 7. Recording of extracellular activity from specific nexus points in the cardiac nervous system has provided important insights into the neurocardiological interactions sub-serving cardiac control. First and foremost, has been the characterization of the complex functional and neurochemical diversity evident within these peripheral ganglia, including multiple cell types (afferent, efferent and local circuit neurons) which utilize a variety of putative neurotransmitters to affect cardiac control 1, 8. Rather than being obligatory relays for descending projections, the majority of intrinsic cardiac neurons recorded using such recording techniques are likely to be local circuit ones that are involved in the coordination of intra- and interganglionic neuronal reflex activities with resultant modulation of regional cardiac function 9, 10. Moreover, in conjunction with end-organ effects, interactions between sympathetic and parasympathetic efferents can occur within intrinsic cardiac ganglia, with major effects on the control of cardiac electrical function 11. Stellate/middle cervical ganglia neuroanatomy exhibits a similar network complexity, including the capacity for interganglionic interactions with the intrinsic cardiac nervous system independent of higher center influences 10 and with only a subset of these neurons projecting directly to the heart 12. Vagal fiber recordings likewise represent a heterogeneous population of efferent and afferent projections to cardiac and non-cardiac structures. These factors should be considered and controlled for when possible when interrupting neural activity from various levels of the cardiac nervous system.

That being said, the current study from Shen et. al. 6 does provide important new information with respect to the potential contributions of different patterns of autonomic activities as related to cardiac electrical stability. In animals with strong left-sided sympathovagal coordination, there is an increased incidence of sympathovagal co-activations with increased incidence of PAT, yet the incidence of PAT is 20% of co-activation episodes. Future studies should consider if there are unique characteristics of unit and\or population discharge that predispose to arrhythmia formation. When considering nerve-end effector interactions, the direct relationship between stellate ganglion neuronal activity and heart rate is expected, yet a similar direct relationship between recorded vagal activity and heart rate is reported. While indeed this may reflect a potential for co-activation as the authors propose, it is counter to classical concepts of reciprocal innervation 13 with parasympathetic predominance. Indeed, this study supports the emerging concept of differential control of regional cardiac function as manifest by interdependent and nested feedback networks that comprise the cardiac nervous system. This study further substantiates the neural remodeling that accompanies end-effector remodeling associated with the cardiac stress of rapid-pace. Future studies should expand on this concept, especially as related to the cardiac stress-induced changes in functional and neurochemical/neurohumoral alterations in the cardiac nervous system and the cardiac tissues they innervate.

Recent studies have indicated that targeting the cardiac nervous system provides new and novel opportunities for effective management of cardiac arrhythmias. Methodologies employed include pharmacological 14, physical 15, 16 and/or electrical 17, 18 means to target specific nexus points within its associated neural networks. While ablation therapy has demonstrated efficacy in AF management 16, 19, 20, such procedures destroy critical elements of the cardiac nervous system that are essential for coordinating regional cardiac function. Recent studies have indicated that local circuit neurons in the cardiac nervous system may be regarded as a potential therapeutic target in arrhythmia suppression. Stabilization of such neurons, either pharmacologically 2, 14 or with electrical neuromodulation 17, has the potential to stabilize the multiple components within the intrinsic cardiac nervous system, reduce the arrhythmogenic potential to nerve imbalances, while at the same time preserving regulatory networks.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Reference List

  • 1.Armour JA. Potential clincial relevance of the ‘little brain’ on the mammalian heart. Exp Physiol. 2008;2:93. 165–76. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2007.041178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Armour JA, Richer LP, Pagé PL, et al. Origin and pharmacological response of atrial tachyarrhythmias induced by activation of mediastinal nerves in canines. Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic and Clinical. 2005;118:68–78. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2005.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chen PS, Tan AY. Autonomic nerve activity and atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2007;4:S61–S64. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2006.12.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Billman GE. A comprehensive review and analysis of 25 years of data from an in vivo canine model of sudden cardiac death: Implications for future anti-arrhythmic drug development. Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2006;111:808–35. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2006.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Scherlag BJ, Po S. The intrinsic cardiac nervous system and atrial fibrillation. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2006;21:51–4. doi: 10.1097/01.hco.0000198980.40390.e4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shen MJ, Choi E-K, Tan AYSH, et al. Patterns of baseline autonomic nerve activity and the development of pacing-induced atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2010 doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.11.040. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ardell JL, Cardinal R, Vermeulen M, Armour JA. Dorsal spinal cord stimulation obtunds the capacity of intrathoracic extracardiac neurons to transduce myocardial ischemia. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2009;297:R470–R477. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.90821.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hoover DB, Isaacs ER, Jacques F, Hoard JL, Pagé P, Armour JA. Localization of multiple neurotransmitters in surgically derived specimens of human atrial ganglia. Neurosci. 2009;164:1170–9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ardell JL, Butler CK, Smith FM, Hopkins DA, Armour JA. Activity of in vivo atrial and ventricular neurons in chronic decentralized canine hearts. Am J Physiol. 1991;260:H713–H721. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1991.260.3.H713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Armour JA, Collier K, Kember G, Ardell JL. Differential selectivity of cardiac neurons in separate intrathoracic autonomic ganglia. Am J Physiol. 1998;274:R939–R949. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1998.274.4.R939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.McGuirt AS, Schmacht DC, Ardell JL. Autonomic interactions for control of atrial rate are maintained after SA nodal parasympathectomy. Am J Physiol. 1997;272:H2525–H2533. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1997.272.6.H2525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hopkins DA, Armour JA. Localization of sympathetic postganglionic and parasympathetic preganglionic neurons which innervate different regions of the dog heart. J Comp Neurol. 1984;229:186–98. doi: 10.1002/cne.902290205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Levy MN. Sympathetic-vagal interactions in the sinus and atrioventricular nodes. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1988;275:187–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Richer LP, Vinet A, Kus T, Cardinal R, Ardell JL, Armour JA. α–Adrenoceptor blockade modifies neurally induced atrial arrhythmias. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol. 2008;295:R1175–R1180. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00840.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lemola K, Chartier D, Yeh YH, et al. Pulmonary vein region ablation in experimental vagal atrial fibrillation: Role of pulmonary veins versus autonomic ganglia. Circ. 2008;117:470–7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.737023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tan AY, Zhou S, Ogawa M, et al. Neural mechanisms of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and paroxysmal atrial tachycardia in ambulatory canines. Circulation. 2008;118:916–25. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.776203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cardinal R, Pagé PL, Vermeulen M, et al. Spinal cord stimulation suppresses bradycardias and atrial tachyarrhythmias induced by mediastinal nerve stimulation in dogs. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol. 2006;291:R1369–R1375. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00056.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Issa ZF, Zhou X, Ujhelyi MR, et al. Thoracic spinal cord stimulation reduces the risk of ischemic ventricular arrhythmias in a post-infarction heart failure canine model. Circ. 2005;111:3217–20. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.507897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Schauerte P, Scherlag BJ, Patterson E, et al. Focal atrial fibrillation: experimental evidence for a pathophysiologic role of the autonomic nervous system. J Cardiov Electrophysiol. 2001;12:592–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2001.00592.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Scherlag BJ, Nakagawa JH, Jackman WM, et al. Electrical stimulation to identify neural elements on the heart: their role in atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2005;13(Suppl 1):37–42. doi: 10.1007/s10840-005-2492-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES