Skip to main content
Deutsches Ärzteblatt International logoLink to Deutsches Ärzteblatt International
letter
. 2013 Apr 5;110(14):253. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2013.0253a

Correspondence (letter to the editor): Differentiation of Breast Cancers Is Missing

Gerhard Weth *
PMCID: PMC3632812  PMID: 23616818

In an article that is otherwise very clearly structured I am missing the differentiation of different breast cancers.

In my personal environment, an invasive, lobular breast cancer measuring 20 mm was detected, by means of sonography, 11 months after the preceding mammography screening examination, which, when the mammograms were analyzed retrospectively, still remained undetectable. This is obviously a methodological problem since—as our radiological colleagues assure us—these tumors cannot be detected by mammography. Since they account for 15–20% of breast cancers, this result is not negligible. This is neither an interval cancer nor technical or human failure.

Reports from normal mammograms back to referrers do not include any mention of the fact that these cancers can be detected only by additional sonography—even if screening uses merely mammography, for financial reasons.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares that no conflict of interest exists.

References

  • 1.Heidinger O, Batzler WU, Krieg V, Weigel S, Biesheuvel C, Heindel W, Hense HW. The incidence of interval cancers in the German mammography screening program—results from the population-based cancer registry in North Rhine-Westphalia. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012;109(46):781–787. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Deutsches Ärzteblatt International are provided here courtesy of Deutscher Arzte-Verlag GmbH

RESOURCES